TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

WolfoftheMountain93 Archive

View 1 post and 43 comments by WolfoftheMountain93 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

CMVWolfoftheMountain93/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/22 03:50 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
31

Aren't women celebrating the fact that they are happier single and don't need a partner to fulfill their needs?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/22 04:06 PM
1

We’re in for a world where literally nobody wants to be committed to anyone and keep looking out for number one people are mistrustful of the people they are dating or always comparing them to others, romance has faded (because why bother when you can jump straight to sex!) everyone is lonely and miserable because OF FUCKING COURSE they would be, family as an institution of social support begins to fade away, people start turning to pets and potted plants for emotional comfort, OnlyFans and Tind…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/22 12:41 PM
3

Giacomo Casanova was an average-looking (or at least not particularly attractive and desirable) dandy who had an excellent Game and knack to know who to approach. If anything, he should be the embodiment of TRP.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/22 08:52 AM
1

I wish you all the best.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/22 04:50 PM
2

Sounds bad. My sympathies.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/22 04:44 PM
1

I mean, I do not know your situation. Maybe I wouldn't settle either if I were in your shoes.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/22 04:41 PM
1

So I like to get to know the person first. Once I know them enough, the sex will determine if we have good enough chemistry or not. That's fine. This is a blog post but the sources are cited down at the bottom Alright, thank you. I'm still confused why those are your only two options you think you'll have to pick from. You can love someone and have fantastic mind blowing sex! I hope you can find that some day! It's not impossible, don't lose hope I do not lose hope because I've never had any. I …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/22 04:37 PM
2

But you can't find a sexual groove until you actually have sex. Y'all can have the best chemistry out of bed, that doesn't equate to chemistry in bed. There's always a learning curve when you sleep with someone new. Sure, but the way you phrased it comes out like you don't wait to see if you click with your partner, but immediately jump into bed and only after judge whether you have chemistry or not. Sorry if it sounds offensive, but that's how I interpreted it. I would never sleep with a random…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/22 04:23 PM
1

Good sex is also a determination of good sex Uh, what exactly does this mean? Sounds like a circular statement. If I don't have chemistry with someone in bed, and we can't find out groove then it probably isn't meant to be I mean, I'd try to find the groove before I get naked with a woman, not while I'm balls-deep inside her, but you do you. This is wildly untrue, people usually stay in toxic relationships because of DV and don't know how to leave. You can't sit there and say people stay solely …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/22 04:00 PM
1

I mean, is it important to have sex and intimacy? To the supermajority of people, yes. Sex and intimacy lead to healthier mental state and happier lives. At some point, all of this dominance/submission alfa/beta strait/gay stuff is going to get tiresome and, at that point, dont we all realize how pathetic our existence is? Yes. What then? Do we still strive to feel enlightened, even after we come to understand the premise of our own base nature?! You may want to alter your definition of "enlight…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/22 10:10 AM
1

Can we make a rule on PPD where when an OP uses this idiotic, absurd and utterly debunked claim of knowing the “fat short loser who gets laid all the time™” that the thread gets deleted? Losers do not get laid, that's true, but being shortish and fattish does not make one a loser, no matter what if you believe that men who aren't Chads have absolutely no hope with women. They do not land Stacies, but they can land above average attractive women. Unlike you, I go outside and interact with average…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/22 10:01 AM
2

Ah yes you know 1 magical short fat guy that sleeps with every 10/10 in the world I've never said this. I said that being shortish and fattish isn't as damning as people make it out to be. I said such guys get laid, I did not say they get with Stacies, merely that being shortish and fattish did not stop them from picking relatively decent chicks up.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/22 09:56 AM
3

People like him think that women have two stages of life: Youth , where she parties, drinks and fucks Chads to her hearts content. Old age , when she gets tired of the above and starts looking to secure the bag by finding a simp willing to finance her vanity. The OP considers women approaching him as an insult, because he thinks they are after his money, not him. He believes that, if he is not the first pick, he is no pick at all for the women and women only would ever approach him to be his sug…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/22 09:10 AM
2

So you don't think a woman who can pleasure you and suck your soul out of your dick is wifey material? Tbh, no. Relationship takes a lot more than just good sex to function, as can be seen from all the toxic relationships people stay in just because sex is good. I'd rather settle for a good woman with relatively good sexskills and an idiot who is a sex goddess.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/22 09:07 AM
2

I think it may be because manospheric men think that, after partying and fucking away their youth, women turn into asexual and funless hags who are only focused on securing the bag and want men who are willing to betabux them. Unless they get with a women in her party-days, in their opinion, they can say goodbye to any and all fun they might have with her later, because she'll be "over it all".
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/22 09:03 AM
1

In different ways. Flattening everything like that is unhelpful. The mistakes women make in dating aren't the exact same mistakes men make. Men's problems aren't necessarily women's problems. Sure, we agree on that. Women's standards are higher than men's, period. But they're higher at the outset, not during the relationship. Men's standards are lower, and they only change if the man himself both raises in value and recognizes that raise. I see no evidence for this phenomenon. Another problem is…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/22 10:24 PM
1

You started the thread in bad faith, arguing around the real crux of what people mean when they talk about women's standards Then I would have to ask what people mean by "women's standards" because I was under impression that people meant women would only go after rich and high-status Chads while leaving normies in dust. If so, I'll have to disagree. Again, I infer you did this because there's little defense or apologia for the reality that women's standards are unreasonable. I do not think want…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/22 08:36 PM
2

Agreed. Whenever I hear men bitching and moaning about women's "unrealistically high standards", I always backpedal to think what they could possibly be referring to, since I see women banging average unremarkable guys every day.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/22 07:49 PM
1

to women, love is inseparable from sexual attraction. This is a new one. Usually, people claim the opposite.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/22 07:45 PM
1

Good looking women don't bang ugly dudes they go get good looking dudes when they just want sex. Sure. Same goes for men. Good looking men will dumpster dive when it suits them. No, they won't. They will go look for good-looking women. Why would good-looking men have sex with ugly women when they can bang a hottie? Don't pretend that handsome men give ugly women time of their day.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/22 07:43 PM
1

Man, why are you so salty? You talk about personality, social skills, and morals. They were generalised examples, because bluepillers often quote them as be-all end-all of man's worth. I merely said women do not care much for those things when they want to get laid. Looks aren't mentioned once in either of your two large paragraphs. I inferred that you did this because acknowledging the beauty component would invalid your whole premise. I really don't understand where you're getting with this. M…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/22 07:41 PM
2

Which, as I said, is a shallow standard, like men's "brainless beauty".
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/22 07:33 PM
3

Guys will sleep with any lady that puts out Maybe the desperate ones, just like ugly women will settle down for the bottom of the barrel guys. Most guys seek out pretty girls and beautiful women to sleep with. but women will only sleep with men who are exceptional Again with this, this is simply not true. Lots of completely average and unremarkable guys get laid all the time, it's not just Chads. No one denies that it's easier getting laid in as a woman You are correct about this and I do not de…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/22 07:33 PM
1

That's straight-up false. Even Chads pump lots of money into their partners and they are the very definition of desirable. I have yet to hear about a Chad who was stingy with money.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/22 07:17 PM
1

It has been confirmed countless times by empirical study that it is not a myth and that women have vastly higher standards than men when it comes to casual sex. And what studies would these be? If women have so high standards, then how is it possible normies get hooked-up all the time? Remember, most men are average, not Chads, and many get laid just fine, even if they don't look like Henry Cavil. Because, oftimes these women hypervalue some specific trait in a partner so highly that they overlo…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/22 07:14 PM
2

But for the latter they are definitely more selective. Everyone is more selective for LTR, or you haven't heard the men's adage of "I'd fuck her, but I wouldn't take her to meet my parents".
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/22 07:11 PM
1

Like what? They have to pay a woman a drink? For that, blame society, not women.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/22 07:10 PM
2

When we say women have higher standards we're only talking about looks. Still not true. Below attractive thugs get women all the time. if a guy doesn't do it for a woman physically little else matters. That's quite a blackpill. Yes, looks are indeed important in dating, but again, they aren't be-all end-all. If you look around, you'll see quite a disparity between the attractiveness of a woman and attractiveness of a man in some couples, with women being more attractive on average. Women can and…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/22 07:09 PM
4

Tinder is horrifically bad example. It is oversaturated with desparate men and hyperfocusing on looks alone. Real-life doesn't function like that, there are many more factors in play there.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/22 07:04 PM
0

Making it about the mental rather than the physical? I never said it was only about mental. that women are just as shallow as men on looks Yes. AND refuse to lower their standards (unlike men). False, their standards for looks are similar to men's accounting for the taste and specifications.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/22 07:02 PM
2

And you think women don't want to bang ugly guys just because they fuck good and women want to get laid? Man, please go outside. You'll see dozens of examples with attractive women being with gonky men.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/22 04:50 PM
3

Abnormal extremes, not at all representatives of average normal men.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/22 04:41 PM
2

I don't know how am I supposed to respond to that, because "banging single moms in their 30s" is a very vague statement.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/22 04:35 PM
1

And this is, in some vein, what I'm trying to say. Men and women's standards are variable, but they even out eventually. It is simply not true that women generally have astronomically high standards while men have abysmally low standards.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/22 04:29 PM
1

Perhaps they have. We are probably all much more desirable then men from thousands of years ago. Perhaps, but taking a look at numerous facial reconstruction of people as far as Stone Age doesn't bring an image that average modern people are more attractive than average Stone Agers. Magdalenian woman looks like someone you could meet on the street today.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/22 04:28 PM
1

No, women generally won’t fuck an ugly, poor nobody casually, but men will Fucking false. Point me at a single instance of a guy who isn't desperate incel pining for such a girl. Let me tell you: there aren't any. Men don't like ugly girls anymore than girls like ugly guys. Because women don’t care about sex that much. They care very much, just, on average, have lower libidos than men. Why would you have so many women thirsting over so many celebrities if they didn't care about sex? Women will n…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/22 04:26 PM
-2

Just being short and fat shaves off the vast majority of women But this isn't really true and is just perpetuated by social media. Short and fat guys get laid all the time. I know a guy who looks like an overgrown baby and he has a girl in every town in my country.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/22 04:22 PM
5

That happens all the time, it just isn't publicised because of society's bias "women = abused / men = abuser".
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/22 04:17 PM
2

I did not say women have low standards, merely that the idea that men are satisfied with anything, while one needs to be Chad-only to satisfy women is an unfounded myth. Both men and women have similar standard in accordance to what each sex perceives as valuable. If they didn't, then why haven't normies been bred out of the existence and replaced by a race of Chads?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/22 04:08 PM
2

Men and women do have a different perception of what is valuable in a mate, yes, but generally speaking, the standards across genders do not have much difference.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/22 04:02 PM
1

I don't think you two disagree. The OP said the only way for LVW to get removed from the genepool is by dying during pregnancy. As long as they are capable of nurturing a child (like you said), she will certainly find a mate. Men, on the other hand, really need to put effort into being selected, with LVM almost certainly being excluded from the genepool altogether, before they even had any chance.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/22 09:39 PM
1

"Survival of the fittest" refers to the survival and propagation of organisms who are most adaptable to their environment. As long as people compete about something, regardless of how cozy the environment is, a hierarchy of fitness will appear based on the individual ability to adapt to circumstances and push through. The OP is saying that men who cannot get women aren't adaptible enough to fit into the mould of a desirable mate and thus shouldn't be pitied.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/22 08:47 PM
1

It is very strange to me men act as though they don't have the exact same ability to set standards and reject those who do not meet them. Because they don't, as men, by-and-large, aren't the main selectors in sexual relationships. Women are. Women are the ones that get courted and have men competing for them, they are the ones that then choose the man they think is the best as their mate. It is up to men to put effort into themselves, court a woman, compete with other men for her and then hope h…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/22 08:41 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter