TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Wollff Archive

View 0 posts and 101 comments by Wollff on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

So first you claim I am lying, without support. Now you claim I am cherrypicking, without support. You claim contradiction, without elaborating what contradicts. It's what I would expect from a 14 year old. If you are older, I am sorry.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/10/20 04:02 PM
1

In none of these options does the man have an option to be devoid of responsibility. And he should? Why? All you are saying here is that women have more options. There are some physiological reasons why that is the case. Aborting is difficult when you can't get pregnant. And the right to abort is a direct result of the mother's bodily autonomy. Fathers have no say here, and that is completely correct and indisputable. IMO. And there are also some practical reasons why those other options exist. …
/r/PussyPassDenied04/10/20 03:45 PM
0

Men aren't allowed to surrender children without a women's choice. Which is it? Can you simply, spontaneously, and anonymously give children up at drop-offs, or can you not? Which of your statements is false? Because one has to be. They directly contradict each other. Women have to choose to allow men the potential for any choice. Yes. And? All of that is a direct result from the fact that children pop out of women after a period of nine months in which the father need not be involved. The resul…
/r/PussyPassDenied04/10/20 03:23 PM
-3

Women CAN surrender the child. And so can men. In most 1st world countries, they can even do it spontaneously and anonymously at drop-offs. If you can do it anonymously, and spontaneously, then so can men. Obviously you will have a problem, when you do that without the consent of the other parent. No matter your gender. When a mother or father comes running, because their child has gone missing, and the other parent says that they have dropped the child off somewhere, without the other parent's …
/r/PussyPassDenied04/10/20 02:03 PM
-1

I don't think I am. She is not allowed to remove rights and financial obligations, divorced from the removal of the child (in any way that is different from the other parent). I was thinking about adoption when typing about removing rights and obligations, in a way that is the same for both parents. So when both parents agree to give up the child for adoption, AFAIK there are no financial burdens on anyone. That's always an option. On the other hand, when one parent wants to bring up the child, …
/r/PussyPassDenied04/10/20 01:49 PM
1

Someones rights have to get trampled here. Do they? I don't think anyone's rights are getting trampled. I think we just have a piece of sex-based inequality, which comes from the fact that physical pregnancy and its abortion are only possible on one side. That's a sad (?) fact, which will not change, until that one Schwarzenegger movie I do not want to remember becomes reality. what we have no removes the mans choice. Why should the man have a choice? For women, the answer to the question is cle…
/r/PussyPassDenied04/10/20 12:49 PM
3

I dont think a man should be allowed to abort a child, but I think a man should be able to remove all his rights and financial obligations regarding a child in the same period as a woman is allowed But a woman is not allowed to do that either. What the woman is allowed to do, is to remove the child as a result of her bodily autonomy. She is not allowed to remove rights and financial obligations, divorced from the removal of the child (in any way that is different from the other parent). I think …
/r/PussyPassDenied04/10/20 12:26 PM
-1

A "right to walk away" leads to the age old problem: Lots of children, where only one parent has to own up to the responsibility to feed their children, while the other half simply refuses and walks away. If you implement that, then you get this result. It is not a particularly good result for anyone. All in all, it is such a particularly undesirable result for any society, that this "right to walk away" has AFAIK always everywhere been dismissed. You fuck and have a child, then you are responsi…
/r/PussyPassDenied04/10/20 12:11 PM
5

I think there is also something to be said for the fact that sometimes people get away with crimes. Okay, that's more a lesson from this whole "financial crisis"-thing that happened before, but it might also fit in here.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/01/20 05:51 PM
2

No. Which study makes that specific claim?
/r/MensRights21/07/17 02:46 AM
2

A source is not difficult to find. Go look it up But that's not my job. Someone here said something that I doubt. So I asked where they were getting their information from. And I got an answer from the OP. I am happy. Asking someone to prove something to you, just because you don't want to go expend the energy to do it yourself, doesn't win you brownie points. I'm not in it for brownie points. I just wanted to know where OP was taking their information from. That's why you ask for sources, so yo…
/r/MensRights20/07/17 11:59 PM
4

A strawman is a reframing of an opponent's argument in an absurd or exaggerated way that makes it easy to knock down (hence the name). And that isn't what is happening here? "It's mainstream feminist policy to declare women unable to consent when drunk", is the statement we are arguing about. Do feminists actually say that? Or is that part of a strawman argument, where one side attributes stupid stances to the other side in order to easily burn them down? At first glance it seems to be like that…
/r/MensRights20/07/17 06:27 PM
0

Yeah, I'm not going to be your gopher. So you do not have a source. Which is fine too. Call it an anecdote if you want You sound critical. What else should I call it? I call it an anecdote, because it is one. Or, maybe it is a strawman: A pseudoargument that is brought up by opponents in order to discredit the other side. "University policies say that women can't consent even after a single drink", is what you claim. I ask for a source (because, if you come form Europe that sounds simply unbelie…
/r/MensRights20/07/17 03:27 PM
7

Yes, I have encountered that argument. But I have never encountered that argument actually being made by a feminist. That's why I am wondering if this really is a stance of "mainstream feminism", and would love a source that can provide clarity on that question.
/r/MensRights20/07/17 03:08 PM
0

When I was a freshman at university (this is decades ago so it wasn't a product of current SJW culture on campus - I can only imagine it's worse now), every male on my dorm floor was forced to attend a "rape awareness" seminar, where we were told about the official position of our large state school - that a female who had had one drink was incapable of consenting to sex and that any male who had sex with such a female was subject to university discipline (up to expulsion). Anecdote. I appreciat…
/r/MensRights20/07/17 03:03 PM
10

Umm except that the feminist consent is that you raped your wife all the times she was drunk. This is the first time I came about that argument. Source?
/r/MensRights20/07/17 12:33 PM
5

Just disable subreddit style, then you can downvote. Echo-chambers don't like that though.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/06/17 10:59 AM
14

You're acting is if you have no responsibility in that. That's not the point. The point is inequality of choice. There is a pregnancy. You come to the conclusion that you are not in a financial situation where you can afford a child. As a woman you have a choice here, as the idiom "pro choice" so wonderfully indicates. But what am I saying? You don't have "a choice". You have all the choices. It starts with information: Do you even tell the father? Do you tell him later, when it's time to pay? D…
/r/PussyPassDenied11/02/17 11:24 PM
0

Why isnt this met with with the response What exactly? The furious meltdown? It isn't met with that, because there is none. What seems to be going on is reasonable discussion. But that would be boring, wouldn't it?
/r/PussyPassDenied11/02/17 11:01 PM
1

It's a good piece of wisdom that seems to come close to a universal truth: In order to achieve mastery, you best learn to love the plateau. Because progress comes in steps, often sudden and without warning. No matter what you do, most of your time between those jumps will be spent on the long and uneventful straights with little progress for much practice.
/r/seduction28/11/14 02:45 PM
1

The concept is females are not as visual beings as men are. Not quite. Girls are less visual in their decision making. That is something that has been shown as far as I know. Whether that is because they are "less visual beings" (genetics) or if we are merely observing learned behavior is not clear.
/r/seduction31/10/14 01:53 AM
5

Evolutionary psychology is evolutionary biology. If what you are doing is an example of what evolutionary psychology is claiming, then no, it is not. What you are doing is bullshitting: Making up tall claims which sound reasonable, but are without any factual support. What you are saying is just your opinion. The women are vying for protection, hierarchal status, and resources. If that is the case in this monkey tribe, then there are two options: Either the behavior is genetically determined (ev…
/r/seduction31/10/14 01:47 AM
3

You are attacking the title I attached to it, not the actual concept Yes. I am. That title is wrong. The results you talk about have nothing to do with evolution. And they have nothing to do with biology. It's psychology.
/r/seduction30/10/14 07:45 PM
6

It's evolutionary biology, there is some research done to show females care much more about the connection This is the comment that set me off on this slightly ridiculous fight against windmills. This is nonsense. Simple as that. If there are studies, they have nothing to do with evolutionary biology. That's all I originally wanted to say. I'm sorry I didn't use scholarly terms and citations in my reddit comment. That isn't my beef with the seduction/redpoll lot. The problem is that there is a t…
/r/seduction30/10/14 07:41 PM
5

It only gets labeled pseudoscience because it presents uncomfortable truths I can only preface it again by: Fuck this! Science doesn't present "truths". When someone starts talking about "uncomfortable truths" that starts ringing alarm bells for me. We are entering conspiracy-ville where everyone knows a truth which is so uncomfortable that an establishment needs it suppressed. Science presents hypothesis supported by data. Not truths. Truth is for truthers. It presents the truth. That we're not…
/r/seduction30/10/14 06:51 PM
5

It's evolutionary biology Oh fuck this! It's shit like this that gives evolutionary biology a bad name. At best this is evolutionary psychology, a field which half of psychology seems to be okay with and the other half dismisses as pseudoscience. I will state this openly: This is not evolutionary biology. Prove me wrong. What you need is a study with data (the thing scientists use with numbers and statistics) which proves the effect we observe comes from evolution (opposed to other environmental…
/r/seduction30/10/14 05:16 PM
3

The conversation in here resembles middle school: "lol, this shit is stupid!", "no, it isn't!" So let me clarify a bit: In many situations this shit is stupid. One on one, on a date, in a flirty atmosphere, both of you are tipsy, quite a bit of game has already occurred, here (and pretty much only here) sex talk is appropriate and will work. Not in a one on one situation? Sex talk almost always is a bad idea. One on one situation and still not at a certain level of intimacy and trust? Sex talk i…
/r/seduction22/10/14 01:14 PM
10

though they are capable, not everyone will make it Yes, not everyone will be mister Olympia. No, everyone can have regular flings with attractive girls.
/r/seduction20/10/14 07:49 AM
1

It still feels like I'm interrogating/interviewing her though... And you also talk yourself, I hope? In my experience half or more of successful small-talk consists of you talking. The aim of all this is to build a connection, not pave a one way street of you asking questions. When a bland answer comes up, you best have something to continue the conversation with some anecdotes or personal tidbit. What I consider helpful is to imagine you are talking to a friend. It doesn't even need to fit very…
/r/seduction12/10/14 12:16 PM
1

Nah, don't worry. After all the results regarding evolutionary psychology are really interesting, and it's easy to get carried away when conclusions just seem to fit so well to experience.
/r/seduction18/07/14 09:05 PM
3

How I hate this. With all due respect for personal aha moments, it just sends me into an unbridled raging stampede when personal experience and bias are poured into expressions which sound like general, scientific, and validated truth. given the opportunity women will cheat “sexy son hypothesis” Yes. Because of a game theoretic construct which explains mating behavior in song birds, and which might explain findings in ovulation dependent attractiveness ratings in humans (as Wikipedia puts it: "H…
/r/seduction18/07/14 08:50 PM
4

You class them into leads, hookups and booty calls, and log your sex with them. And here we have another reason why the term PUA is associated with sleazy scumbags who treat women as sex objects.
/r/seduction29/04/14 03:21 PM
1

I think I might have spotted your problem. You are bad at a certain very specific thing. And unless you learn to get good at that skill, it will probably limit you in all areas of your life. I've been hit on by many of my girl friends, even if I like them I don't go further than flirting because I know I would have have to end up doing any of the above, and I would fail terribly at it. That's the sentence which set me off, and it seems to embody your problem. Take a moment, reread it, and think …
/r/seduction24/04/14 12:45 PM
1

The fact that it's common for women to say "All men are assholes" or something similar, completely ignoring the army of nice guys who will do everything for them. Thank you for that explanation. The way you put it makes sense. In the end one can state the main lesson of the post as the fact that we don't remember unremarkable people. That is a very basic, universal, and reasonable lesson. You are right: The author does himself a disservice by limiting his examples to feminism, and depicting this…
/r/seduction22/04/14 09:35 PM
21

So either you are attractive, or you are not. Okay. I have to admit that I don't really see the big insight in the tagline of the article. But maybe there is something else, right? So I read that post. It really is not the shit. The author tries to make an argument. And most of the time he seems to fail pretty miserably. Example – a supermodel or famous actress mentions in an interview how its so hard to find anyone to date and that guys are intimidated by her. Bullshit. you know me – I will alw…
/r/seduction21/04/14 05:16 PM
-1

we define ourselves through interaction with others... [citation needed] After all you are stating this philosophical tidbit as a fact. So you should at least tell us where it comes from, because such loose sentences on their own and without any context are a little empty of meaning, I am afraid. we naturally compare ourselves to others and form a concept of the "I" based on what we are, what others are, and how the others respond to us. Which is true. But doesn't mean anything. We also naturall…
/r/seduction28/03/14 07:38 PM
4

So what exactly is this truth claiming? Only rich and beautiful people have sex? If that is meant, then it's not a truth, because it's pretty obviously false.
/r/seduction21/03/14 07:46 AM
6

You need to consider the possibility that you are wrong. Not a little bit off, but even totally wrong. That's because you can't trust your observations on the matter, because as a part of the seduction community you are prone to several biases. The strongest ones are a combination of expectation bias and a certain social narrative: You know about shit tests. You expect them to occur. You will now see them everywhere. And you will, inevitably, at least sometimes interpret stuff as a shit test, th…
/r/seduction20/10/13 10:07 AM
3

What do i do if i'm just plain boring? If you are boring, there is nothing you can do about it. Sorry. Luckily there is nobody who just is boring. There might be some people who behave in ways that make them appear boring to others. That is a problem that is solvable. It isn't even very complex. What behavior do you think makes you appear boring? What would be a better alternative? How do you get from one pattern of behavior to the other?
/r/seduction14/10/13 01:04 PM
0

Wait. Since when was being persistent placed on the plus side of this game? In most cases I would put being persistent on the side of clingy and desperate. When you are persistent, you are either not getting any information (you are being ignored, or are tone deaf to social situations), or you are getting bad vibes and are choosing to ignore them.
/r/seduction12/08/13 12:23 AM
3

Unnatural? Well, it's a culture thing, so for anyone who is not familiar with it, it is unnatural. But things like The Claw are a natural outgrowth of clubbing culture. There are only so many ways to get someone's attention in a club, and pulling someone towards you is one of them. Give it a good name, and everyone immediately knows what is meant when talking about it afterwards. It is not so much about the instructions anyway. To repeat one of those scary terms: calibration is much more importa…
/r/seduction23/07/13 01:28 PM
29

Real tl;dr: Be psychologically healthy, confident, and single.
/r/seduction25/06/13 08:30 AM
7

As others have already said: The example responses are pretty terrible. And the whole dominance thing? I think it's a bad approach. Why are you at a bar? To pick up chicks? Or to have a good time? No matter which it is, it is probably not good advice to go, be dominant, and approach women with an attitude that says: "I am going to dominate social interaction, and later tonight I am going to dominate you. From behind" Very alpha. And retarded. If you want to have fun, and if you want those around…
/r/seduction10/05/13 12:13 PM
19

Op doesn't agree. Because you shouldn't show that you are a fun guy who doesn't take other peoples' bullshit seriously. Op thinks you need to assert dominance in this social situation by taking control. I think this is a pile of bullshit. There is a reason why people talk about game: When somebody throws something at you, you throw something back that fits the situation. Shouting back: "I don't want to play! And if we play, then only by my rules!", has shown a lack of confidence ever since grade…
/r/seduction10/05/13 10:53 AM
3

have to have the confidence to pull off a ridiculous dance style without coming across as an idiot. It's fine to have a ridiculous dance style and come off as an idiot. Ever since I saw a guy in a pope outfit with a coffin strapped to his back, wandering the festival grounds, I knew: What counts as idiotic doesn't count.
/r/seduction22/04/13 01:50 PM
3

As I understand it, putting your foot down is intended to change someone else's behavior. It is done in the offending person's presence and it is addressed directly at them. It is quick, simple, and determined, along the lines of: "If you don't stop behavior X, I am going to do Y", which is at least implied. Bitching is the opposite of that: It's not so much about taking action to change what someone else is doing, but merely about putting someone else down. It tends to be personal. It can easil…
/r/seduction12/04/13 08:29 AM
11

I like spoons...
/r/seduction26/02/13 12:29 AM
2

tl;dr? Okay, I did read it, but what the hell is the problem? I am pretty sure that I don't understand it. The problem as I understand it: You let a girl you don't care about, you don't sleep with, you have never slept with, and you will never sleep with, boss you around. Because you are afraid that, if you showed some of the self respect that you seem to have temporarily misplaced along with your balls, and told her what you think about her actions, she might tell your mutual friends that you w…
/r/seduction25/02/13 08:51 PM
5

Wait, what? Since when does social interaction have anything to do with PUA? Look, here is the comprehensive list: Just get yourself a wingman, and there you go. Open up a promising set (Don't be intimidated by your approach anxiety! Your whole body and mind scream: "This is a dumb idea!"? Don't listen!) Show confidence (cocky funny! alpha male! neg! don't put pussy on a pedestal!) Kino early, kino often (don't be shy!) Isolate (obviously only after you have built rapport and demonstrated value …
/r/seduction05/02/13 04:12 PM
2

You mean alpha males!
/r/seduction05/02/13 02:27 PM
9

You don't visit here often, do you?
/r/seduction05/02/13 03:43 AM
6

It's what you would expect of the embodiment of chaotic neutral.
/r/seduction30/01/13 05:57 PM
1

I think this might be more important than most people think. In order to speak with a confident voice, you are forced to relax your breathing and relax your diaphragm. That relaxation tends to spread out, as most people who meditate will know from experience. So when you get ready to speak with a confident voice, not only are you doing things to your vocal apparatus, you are centering yourself, body and mind. And that helps not only with sounding confident, but with feeling and being confident.
/r/seduction31/12/12 01:30 PM
1

So you actually watched that? After such a lame sales pitch?
/r/seduction28/12/12 03:02 PM
3

tl;dr: Magic is a lie! I am shocked and offended!
/r/seduction17/12/12 03:53 AM
2

What's your reasoning behind asking other girls in the set whether it's okay to flirt with a a girl? If it's not okay, they will let you know anyway one way or another. If it is okay for them, you didn't need to ask. I don't think you need their friends' approval to flirt with someone anyway. If you act like to you do, that might give them a justification to butt in: "I would like to have my friend back now. So I am revoking your permission to flirt with her, which I have given you before" That …
/r/seduction15/12/12 06:09 AM
1

Well, many good points have already been made in this thread: As we all know, if you really want to fuck beautiful girls, you have to become the best version of yourself! You need to raise your self esteem. You have to approach more. You have to try harder and get over your neediness. There are a lot of things you have to work on. And you will have to master all of that quickly, because once you are out of college, a unique opportunity will have slipped by. You are going to regret that for the r…
/r/seduction13/12/12 04:12 AM
4

Is it? Maybe I am a little strange, but unless the story of your ailment involves copious amounts of Vodka, and a bet that involves swallowing a greased up hamster alive, I don't want to hear about other people's medical history on a party...
/r/seduction11/12/12 01:06 AM
12

How differently that movie would have ended: The only winning move is to cheat like the bastard you are...
/r/seduction06/12/12 03:11 PM
2

If you need a reason for yourself to put those 5-10 minutes aside each day, remember that it makes you more effective. And that's how the lazy generation motivates itself...
/r/seduction04/12/12 06:08 PM
1

Anteater is the mind-killer. Anteater is the little-death that brings total obliteration. I will face my anteater. I will permit it to pass over me and through me. And when it has gone past I will turn the inner eye to see its path. Where the anteater has gone there will be nothing. Only I will remain.
/r/seduction02/12/12 04:58 PM
1

Our brains are always going to try and avoid pain I hate such phrases with a passion. The statement that it's our brains that do something, plays the same role that "our genes" played ten years ago. It's an empty attempt at justification by shrugging and claiming it is just so. Try that statement with people instead of brains, to see what I mean: People will always try to avoid pain. You probably wouldn't Agee for a second with that. Every one of us knows too many people who have at times invite…
/r/seduction19/11/12 01:31 AM
1

That's the joke.
/r/seduction18/11/12 07:06 AM
3

the more and more I learn about the social dynamics, the more I feel like an outsider watching in, creating this weird sense of loneliness It might be time for a break. Not so much from going out and having fun, but from the mostly analytical game that socializing becomes once you learn about seduction. It seems you already know how to approach people and have a good time with them. That's great. You might want to put getting better at that back on your priority list for some time, and focus on …
/r/seduction05/10/12 12:42 PM
6

At least he didn't go with "gives great head"...
/r/seduction19/09/12 06:54 PM
1

the importance of things like symmetry and size aspect ratios to define what is considered attractive. I think that's confounding two similar things: attraction vs. beauty. When rating a photograph, beauty mostly equates attraction. After all we don't have many other things to go by. Usually that isn't the case though. In face to face interaction many other factors influence the "attraction score", with beauty only being one of them.
/r/seduction17/09/12 12:38 PM
11

Granted. But it's a bit hard to find an example everyone knows, who is not famous.
/r/seduction17/09/12 12:16 PM
0

Isn't it also a little assholeish to bring your brother along on a first date because you "don't do relationships?" No. It would be a bit difficult if she unexpectedly showed up with her brother in tow. But that way? No problem at all. I mean: Why should it be? Too insecure to have a fun evening with an additional person in tow? What OP did comes off as "choking on alpha", because this conversation gives off a deadly serious vibe: "Listen woman, I want this to be a proper date. There are formali…
/r/seduction10/09/12 09:30 AM
5

Had you been creepy, she wouldn't have replied.
/r/seduction01/09/12 07:42 PM
3

You might look up Cosmo's "10 Things That Make You a Good Friend!"-feature. Seriously: Do you really need the internet's opinion on whether you are allowed leave your friend unattended for an evening? You certainly don't need my permission to do what you think best. So be your own man, think, decide, and do it. Or buy an issue of Cosmo. Great relationship advice, and totally alpha too.
/r/seduction12/08/12 03:59 PM
5

Yes, you better hurry. You will be immune after. On an unrelated note: Don't trust medical advice you get on the internet.
/r/seduction10/08/12 02:57 PM
3

Well, think what you want, my money is on the bugs.
/r/seduction10/08/12 02:55 PM
1

be aware (readers) that you can always pull good things from a poor or strange source. At the same time this has some dangers of its own. If you take things that sound good on paper from someone who is unable or unwilling to practice them, you might burden yourself with impossible expectations, set yourself up for failure, and mess up your inner game. "You must always be totally confident in your abilities!", is one of those sentences. Looks great on paper, has terrible consequences when things …
/r/seduction04/08/12 11:14 AM
0

Woman tells guy she has a boyfriend, and anyone who suggests he escalate anyway is downvoted into oblivion. Oh yes. Downvoted into oblivion. The top comments beyond the one you linked: Hi. You must be new here. Really? Bro code works for bros, not for guys I haven't even met. What the fuck is the "bro code" nonsense? I don't know I'm ambivalent on that one, if she is hitting on you I kind of think it is ok. So yes, what a concerning flood of whiteknighting that is flooding the subreddit. /drama
/r/seduction04/07/12 07:29 AM
2

And who said I'm doing anything "bad?" You. You said it's something you wouldn't do to a friend, because it's "scummy". That's the only problem I have: Either you say it's okay to enable cheating and put an already ailing relationship to the sword with your... involvement. Or you say it's not okay to intrude into someone's relationship, because it's a scummy thing to stick... your nose into someone else's business. You can't have both. All the arguments you bring to justify your actions apply to…
/r/seduction03/07/12 07:30 PM
0

If I pass on your girl, she'll find the next good looking guy she can have a one nighter with. So it's okay for you to do something bad if someone else would do it anyway? Note* all the previous goes completely out the window if it's a girlfriend of one of my actual friends, that's just scummy. The way I see it I'm not the one in the committed relationship, and I'm not making the advances. If you pass on his girl she'll find the next good looking guy she can have a one nighter with... Conclusion…
/r/seduction03/07/12 05:55 PM
-1

you wouldn't have said no. Or maybe he would? Important lesson: Not everyone is like you.
/r/seduction26/06/12 03:40 AM
0

What you must realize is that she is using you and she is a fucking whore. Nice shot bro! High five for slut shaming! Those are the kinds of statements that keep seduction firmly rooted in the creepy shady corner. We don't know whether she has a boyfriend or not. She might just be having some fun with a bit of exciting roleplay. Or that teenager might indeed have a boyfriend and had a drunken fling with someone on a party. The terror! Every PUA that has ever done stupid shit like that is now off…
/r/seduction22/06/12 04:18 PM
6

I am currently lying in bed with some variant of death flu. Obviously I could go out, but I have doubts. Will it be smart to start my epic journey of self transformation, when strange liquids regularly erupt from most of my bodily orifices? Keep in mind that your answer might shape the course of a zombie apocalypse.
/r/seduction10/06/12 10:48 PM
1

Yes, it's understandable that you are skeptical of therapy now. The problem is that there is a whole weed garden of different therapeutic schools out there, which differ from each other quite a bit. So it might still be worth checking out someone who practices another method What I'll describe later is a method that you might encounter in cognitive therapy. And it's more than just listening. It's about fighting back. But if it's really just about result orientation, this subreddit might be a goo…
/r/seduction10/06/12 10:07 PM
2

Is it supposed to be this bad? I think you kind of know the answer to that yourself. Let me put it another way: Most people don't experience anxiety attacks that bad, pretty much no matter what kind of situation they are in. I am not a therapist. /r/seduction is not one. And since your attacks are so bad that they are becoming problem that bleeds over into your everyday life and seriously impacts you quality of life. it might be a smart choice to see one if you can. That being said, you might be…
/r/seduction10/06/12 08:52 PM
15

Congratulations. So you are not sure what to expect? Well, you will get lots of stuff about approaching women, opening sets, kino, escalation, lifestyle advice etc. etc. But there are some other jewels buried in here too. Let me give you a rundown on one of the less obvious things you will have to fix if you decide to walk this path. It's not going to be one of the typical "108 paths to tantric kino" guides (though I'd read the shit out of that...). Let's do some inner game instead: Your warped …
/r/seduction10/06/12 06:07 PM
3

Don't get me started on happiness. I might start rambling even more than I already have. In order to avoid that, let me try to summarize: Be your own happiness, by facing the world with a mind open to enjoy it all.
/r/seduction04/06/12 12:45 AM
5

isn't it necessarily putting a ceiling on how much you care about a particular girl's opinion of you? Putting in a ceiling on how much you care about other people's opinions is a healthy thing to do. You can't control what others think. That's their decision. If you let others decide how you feel, depending on their current approval rating of you, you are walking a thorny path. The bottom line is that even if you're "outcome independent" you're still LESS happy at the end of the night if you don…
/r/seduction03/06/12 12:24 AM
19

Since you mentioned the word philosophy, it will be my pleasure to take this apart for you. Essentially your mistake lies in a strange definition of "outcome independence". You define it in a nihilisitc manner: Outcome independence means that one isn't allowed to care about outcomes. That is not a very good definition for the reasons you outline. A better definition: Outcome independence means that your happiness is independent from the outcome of a certain action. If you reduce your emotional i…
/r/seduction02/06/12 02:45 PM
8

My inner game is fucked up. Yes, it is. But don't you worry. You have already invested all the effort to get everything, from looks to body language, in order. Compared to that all your problems are fixable with relative ease. Being alpha requires you to be on your A game all the time and be what people expect you to be, consistently. Being alpha requires that from you? Then there is not a single alpha male on planet earth. Nobody is "on his game" all the time. It's an unrealistic expectation. I…
/r/seduction02/06/12 09:44 AM
1

Obviously you are right. What she says is pretty clear most of the time. It's just the way she says it that makes me alternately laugh, cry, and want to mutilate myself. With that out of the way, and because I love the thrill that comes with bad dreams, let's have a look at what she says, and see whether there is something worthwhile in there. We are meant to discover someone to share our life with This is the first sign of prince charming syndrome: At one point we are meant to discover Him. It'…
/r/seduction27/05/12 01:57 PM
5

Oh my God. If you are even a bit of a language nerd, this is awesome. This was the most awesome piece of writing I have encountered in a long time. This text oozes the terrible, morbid fascination of a gore picture: You don't want to see the terror it displays, but once you look, you can't look away from it. Its grotesque shape burns itself into your retina. It leaves you scarred and it will follow you into your dreams. Just reread those passages! when you look over at me in that shiny leather p…
/r/seduction27/05/12 03:33 AM
4

I think you have just starved some people to death...
/r/seduction26/05/12 02:10 PM
1

This post really inspires ranting. I will try to remain civil. There are some phrases that have a certain meaning in a certain context. "Nice guy" is one of them. In a PUA context it means the same as beta or AFC: Someone who is a perfectly agreeable, average, nice person who follows social norms and bends over backwards in order to do so. The first thing one should practice when reading texts, is reading them in context. Only because the word "nice" appears in the text, doesn't automatically me…
/r/seduction26/05/12 04:05 AM
2

She was not unconscious, she ad just lost some inhibition and showed what she wanted. So, fast forward the next day, after a hypothetical kiss. Fast forward to a mix of confusion ("But I thought we were just friends!"), guilt ("I destroyed our friendship"), and self loathing ("I'm such a slut!") in the girl of your dreams, which will subsequently be projected onto.... .... drumroll ... YOU! Congratulations.
/r/seduction22/05/12 02:13 PM
4

Yes, that is an impression most of us share. But it's an impression: We feel that women seem to be driven more by feelings than men. If psychologists test that and it turns out to be the case it becomes more, along the lines of: "Surveys show that women are more driven by feelings in their decisions than men" And only if neuroscience produces results which connect this observation to the brain (as opposed to culture, upbringing etc.), only then can you start talking about gender specific differe…
/r/seduction22/05/12 01:30 AM
14

Some parts of this were really interesting. Some parts were terrible. Abysmal. Nausea inducing. I had to stop after 27 minutes. This talk suffers from the classical bullshit effect. Classical as in Socrates. Let me explain: PUAs know how to pick up women. From that bit of skill they then begin to form theories about everything: Human evolution, the role of genetics in the male/female relationship, the role of women in hunter gatherer society, the "natural state" of humanity, the psychological di…
/r/seduction21/05/12 10:13 PM
2

Well... this is going to be a little long, since I have strong feelings about anything that starts with: "You should..." So I've know about the seduction community for about 5-6 months. That is about the usual timespan where you can and should simply be insanely curious. Read everything, watch everything and get a feeling for things. That's what you did, and that's what I consider a perfect beginning in the study of every topic. Now you have a solid idea what all that PUA nonsense is about. It's…
/r/seduction21/05/12 03:17 PM
3

There are so many possible answers, it's hard to choose. They all are not a random number between 1 and 10 though: It's none of that guy's business how many girls you have or have not had sex with, so anything but an honest sounding answer is fine. As far as numbers go, let's start at zero: State your virginity with the biggest grin and the most inflated sense of pride you can manage. Then continue to berate the other guy as a slut if he doesn't admit to his virginity in the same way. Since it s…
/r/seduction21/05/12 11:00 AM
20

Because a good chunk of the seduction community consists of Dumb Misogynist Assholes (DMA). Let's be honest: DMAs exist. And there probably is nothing more attractive to someone like that than the promise of having a harem of subservient female sex slaves. That's a promise seasoned PUAs are all too ready to give. Just do a 3-day workshop with them, give them a not so tiny bit of your money, and you will get your harem! Maybe you even get a certificate with "PUA" printed on it. That sounds incred…
/r/seduction17/05/12 10:36 AM
5

Also is there any way I could balance out the Alpha with the Nice guy? No, probably not. Clearly it depends on what those terms mean to you. But they certainly can be mutually exclusive: If "being nice" means constantly compromising for others, constantly putting your own values, aims, and wishes behind those of others, then no "being nice" is probably not compatible with "being alpha". The whole concept of "alphaness" comes down to being in control of what you want, knowing what you want, and a…
/r/seduction16/05/12 09:58 AM
7

I fought through the awkwardness and made a ton of self-deprecating jokes. I've found the self deprecating joke a minefield too difficult to navigate. I mean, what is the purpose of those anyway? The only thing they seem to do is to show insecurity.
/r/seduction07/05/12 01:52 PM
6

Because it's fun.
/r/seduction07/05/12 01:36 PM
2

For the sake of argument, I might go along with that and concede that there is a lesser of two evils. Even if that were as clear, as you make it out to be, one question remains: Why the heck are we even asking something that stupid?
/r/MensRights26/01/11 10:23 AM
5

Which is worse: Losing your right leg or losing your left leg? I could imagine that even after the temporary cuts and bruises heal, there you are still far from okay after being raped. Believe it or not, I heard people even kill themselves over things like rape.
/r/MensRights26/01/11 10:06 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter