TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

WomenMustServeInArmy Archive

View 7 posts and 79 comments by WomenMustServeInArmy on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

The problem is why you were alone. Aren't there other male students in your university? We should inform everyone about men discrimination.
/r/MensRights09/03/17 07:10 AM
2

Rly, where is international men's day?
/r/MensRights07/03/17 01:02 PM
1

Exactly. Women abuse their appearance mililon times more often.
/r/MensRights07/03/17 08:44 AM
1

I think that's not harassment, that's just mass (false) reports of "harassment".
/r/MensRights07/03/17 07:46 AM
0

So, in the past, women had no right, and, possibly, men were equal or more important then women. So the most bad time for men in history is today, when someone is saying that women are more important. And we should confront such a position.
/r/MensRights07/03/17 06:50 AM
2

We should just work everyday and to spread information, and in the end a truth always wins.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 07:47 PM
-1

If you say or think that women are more important i don't think you can correctly protect rights of men. But as for Celts who were ancestors of europeans their women were conscripted in army till 500 a.d. So i think it the past women and men were considered equal, women were not more important.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 06:26 PM
2

There was not so much risk, in that time many women born about 15 children and still had good health.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 06:13 PM
-2

To increase society population there's no need to give rights for women. In the past, by some way - it was the opposite - women were forced to born children, so it's hard to say whether they were above men or not. Maybe in different time in different places different things happened. But, as i said, base of humanity is equality between men and women, so women should not be considered more important then men.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 06:10 PM
8

Generally, i agree with you. But i want to admit, that men had some problems and long ago before feminists in their current form appeared. Conscription, hard work - that issues men had long ago. But men had some additional rights for that. Were that rights enough? I doubt, i think women were privileged sex all the time and men were discriminated about several thousands years. But, i think, all the other time of humanity both sexes were pretty equal and balanced, for example, in some societies su…
/r/MensRights06/03/17 05:42 PM
3

You find it sexist, but 99% of men even don't think about it, don't understand that they are discriminated. And that's the main problem which we should to fix. Just give people the truth and information. And what about your problem - maybe you can tell the post office, that selective service office told you, that its up to post office. And they can treat you the same as women workers, who are not being draft listed. And if they don't agree you can tell them that you can make the sue to a court.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 09:17 AM
2

You've got the point. xD
/r/MensRights06/03/17 08:13 AM
2

I think if you are not registered they should prove that it's your fault. But, possibly, by the law situation is opposite, and you should prove that its not your fault. So, as i said, - ask some lawyer about advice, or, if you would be fired from your job you can try to make the sue to the court about 1) Its not your fault that they've lost your registration 2) Gender discrimination
/r/MensRights06/03/17 07:49 AM
5

I'm not a lawyer, so take my advice with care and on your own risk. But i think you can make a sue to the court about gender discrimination. Or do what they want - register.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 07:10 AM
3

But women use different child support programs, which most of men don't. If the state created situation where men's life duration is less then women's - then the responsibility of the state is to fix it by changing their politics to make men and women life duration equal.
/r/MensRights05/03/17 06:34 AM
6

I think that all is said in the title. If men use retirement money less, then they should pay less money as retirement tax during their work time. OR the state should take care of prolonging men's life. I think, that retirement tax and retirement money should depend on the life expectancy of your sex. If women live more - they should pay more taxes for retirement, or get less retirement money.
/r/MensRights05/03/17 06:22 AM
5

The answer is very simple. Till now most men have never thought about protecting their rights. And many people are shocked that a men is human too and demands equal rights and responsibilities. So, don't worry about aggression - soon there will be more and more of us. Just tell people the truth.
/r/MensRights05/03/17 02:11 AM
1

I have read one interesting idea in other topic. You say, that having sex with someone automatically accepts all outcomes, but what exactly? If we accept that women can become pregnant and born and child then a women must accept that if she will become pregnant she has ask your permission about abortion. Argument "her body" doesn't work here (because if its only her body problems why should we care what her body has produces).
/r/MensRights05/03/17 02:08 AM
2

The society is a one whole. You can't give someone rights and not to harm someone else. So to bash women's issues is correct if it is needed. But the main our goal is to not achieve privileges but to achieve equality of all people around the world.
/r/MensRights04/03/17 08:12 PM
13

But i have to admit that to be sex object is not so bad. While to be violence object is bad.
/r/MensRights04/03/17 06:44 PM
1

the DNA in the child, is niether "the mothers" nor "the fathers" but the childs, predominantly because the active and inactive DNA wont necersarily be the same as the parents thus its "different" information. So is it correct if someone steal's your DNA, he can do anything with that? Is it legal?
/r/MensRights04/03/17 06:43 PM
1

If some women will produce many children, then the others can not to produce children at all, and go to the army. It will be fair - that some women are released from military service and have to born 10-15 children, while others can serve in army on par with men.
/r/MensRights04/03/17 12:49 PM
46

Feminism doesn't differ from patriarchy at all. Both in feminism and patriarchy men has no rights and is considered as combat meat. It's the same ideology but with different names.
/r/MensRights04/03/17 12:25 PM
6

If women by biological reasons can't serve in army, then they should do other contribution - for example pay 50% of their wage to the men who can be drafted. Or at least to serve alternate civil service.
/r/MensRights04/03/17 12:01 PM
1

If this were true, i would completely agree, it is, however, not true. the mother has far more responsibilities under the current system, even if that comes with a lot more rights. Are you speaking about USA? As i know, in some countries women can leave the child at special house, and even doesn't have to pay child support money. we give consent when we have sex, the general idea is that "when you consent, you consent to all foreseeable outcomes". i think we can both agree pregnancy is the fores…
/r/MensRights04/03/17 10:25 AM
1

I'm sure you are right for now. But that's just the beginning. At first as much women as possible should be conscripted. Then we should demand that they do the same work and perform participation in combat action on par with men. Military casualties reports should be checked and there should be equal losses of compulsory conscripted men and women.
/r/MensRights04/03/17 08:50 AM
2

To solve that problem we can use mostly women of age 30+ in combat action. If there will not remain women of age 30+, then we can send younger women into combat.
/r/MensRights04/03/17 08:46 AM
2

The same we can say about army. If only men are being drafted, why should they care and pay money for child rising? If so, shouldn't, then, women, take part in military combat, or pay military tax which drafted men get?
/r/MensRights04/03/17 04:40 AM
1

If both parents have equal responsibility then both should have equal rights to stay with child and to make choices about the child. But isn't mothers priority higher, because she can breastfeed, for example? So if mother's role has more priority, then she has to have more responsibility. If "her body" argument applies then why should we care about what her body produces? If women has priority of living with child then she is using our genetic code without our permission, and must pay fee for it…
/r/MensRights04/03/17 01:25 AM
16

If men have to pay child support then women has no right not to inform father of the child about hit paternity. Also, child has 50% of father's genes, so for using that genes women should inform the father, and, possibly, pay him fee for his genes usage. If women want privacy then child support should be eliminated.
/r/MensRights03/03/17 04:21 PM
2

Poor conditions of life of men created by the state enforces men to make a crime, or they are imprisoned for crimes that they didn't commit and it proves that men are not privileged sex and they are discriminated.
/r/MensRights03/03/17 03:20 PM
3

Violence on TV should be equal to men and women.
/r/MensRights03/03/17 02:19 PM
8

That's what I was saying in the other topic. They should not be sitting behind men in safe. But, anyway, respect to Sweden.
/r/MensRights02/03/17 10:39 PM
1

Then explain to me how the top women athletes don't come anywhere close to the top male athletes. Males have more muscle mass, period. That's fucking basic biology. Very simple. Not all males have more muscles - just best athletes have. Average men have same muscles as average women if they are doing the same training. Who? And how much frontline fighting did she do? Storming trenches or enemy positions? None? Well, there is your answer. Pavlichenko had the option of becoming a nurse but refused…
/r/MensRights02/03/17 01:45 PM
0

No they wont. Also, hands have fuck all to do with it. Yes they do. Or they have more body fat. No they don't. They receive training and become strong, or they die a bloody death. How then soviet women sniper at age 55 became hero? Any women can become regular infantry soldier. Neither do male athletes. All men who train in gym use protein. If some one says he doesn't - 99% he's liar. No they don't. Also, marathon IS an Olympic discipline. And men outperform the women there as well. Paula Radcli…
/r/MensRights02/03/17 01:10 PM
1

But will women agree to be slaves of men in peacetime, to allow them protect women in war time? If no - they should be drafted.
/r/MensRights02/03/17 12:57 PM
2

Anyway, if women can't have the same obligations they should no have same rights - its very simple. So it's best for them to prove that they can fight as good as men, or they should be cut out of many rights. Equal duties = equal rights. Not equal duties = not equal rights. That's fair.
/r/MensRights02/03/17 12:33 PM
0

While still having a stronger upper body than women who also don't train They just do more work with hands, if women will work more they'll have the same upper body. No. Send your average man and your average women into the gym 3 times a week with the same workout. The man will soon outperform the woman, lifting heavier, guaranteed. Men and women have a different ceiling when it comes to physical ability Not only athletes performed in wars. Physically weak people became heroes too. No. Find me a…
/r/MensRights02/03/17 12:30 PM
0

By disaster I mean, more men will die than if the women were not there. Maybe if exclude men with white or black skin color from draft then less people will die? That's not an argument.
/r/MensRights02/03/17 12:24 PM
1

Not rly, recent studies showed that brain differences between different people are much bigger then brain differences between sexes. That's not moral duty of strong human to protect and die for weak human, because all people are equal and no one should protect the other except by free will. If, for example, men with black skin color fight better then with white, or opposite, should we exclude men with one of skin color from conscription or draft?
/r/MensRights02/03/17 12:09 PM
1

If we imagine a situation that the oppression of citizens on the basis of gender or race can reduce military casualties, whether it would be correct to compulsory conscript only the people of that race, which is fighting the best? Of course not - all citizens must participate in combat action, irrespective of their gender and race.
/r/MensRights02/03/17 11:43 AM
1

I think, that there are many men, who are worse then regular joes of the USMC. It doesn't release them from being draft listed, that's why women should not be released from combat action too. (If we imagine a situation that the oppression of citizens on the basis of gender or race can reduce military casualties, whether it would be correct to compulsory conscript only the people of that race, which is fighting the best? Of course not - all citizens must participate in combat action, irrespective…
/r/MensRights02/03/17 11:31 AM
1

Common infantry performs worse, the elite special squad, it doesn't mean, that common infantry is not needed. They just are used other ways, same can be applied to women. If they perform bad they can be mixed with bad male fighters for missions which don't require skill (holding position under artillery fire etc).
/r/MensRights02/03/17 11:03 AM
2

Many men, who don't train, have weak upper body too. But is strong upper body essential to carry M16 rifle? Even 10-years child participated in some wars as infantry with heavier AK. And if upper body strength is needed - then it can be easily achieved by several months training. Women waste much time for ass and leg training (and achieve progress better then most men), there is no problem if they focus on the upper body if needed. Also women have stronger lower-body which is essential for infan…
/r/MensRights02/03/17 09:50 AM
2

Then, maybe people were taking awful chances not to save only women, but to save and other men or friends. Or just their chances were always awful because lack of training. So, i think, there are no major problems in using women massively in combat action.
/r/MensRights02/03/17 08:48 AM
2

That problem lies in social education. Boys are not educated to stay safe and to treat themselves as important as girls. But if problem exists, then women should fight in squads where serve mostly women. Or to mix them with men who are psychologically selfish and don't put themselves in danger. If women can't take action in combat then their civil rights should be cut by some degree and they have to get other hard obligations, or men should be forced to psychologically train to not risk to save …
/r/MensRights02/03/17 08:31 AM
1

What disadvantage do women have in infantry? Stamina of women is on par with men (after some training), and they have enough strength to carry a rifle. Modern light materials for weapon and equipment make that even easier. But i want to speak about other countries. Do sides involved in, for example, Syrian conflict use compulsory conscription? How many men are affected by that? I heard a story about women which escaped from Syria and she told, that her lover could not go away with her. So i thin…
/r/MensRights02/03/17 08:02 AM
3

Not only. North Korea is conscripting women, and Norway has made military service for women compulsory too (big respect to Norway). BUT are the Israel women participating in combat action on par with men? I think no, so there service in the military is like the civil job. So there can be three sides of discrimination 1) Women are not conscriped 2) If women are conscripted they are not forced to participate in combat 3) If women participate in combat they perform safer operations. And problems 2 …
/r/MensRights02/03/17 07:10 AM
3

Good point. But much more evil then draft is draft by gender (how many men were compulsory conscripted and killed because they were born wrong sex in WW1-2 and Vietnam?). So, we should get rid of a draft, or make women available for that. While USA can exist without draft, not all countries in the world can. So we should think about these countries, and force them to conscript women and stop men discrimination, if these countries can not fight without compulsory conscription.
/r/MensRights02/03/17 06:57 AM
3

Answer to that question is very simple. If there is no chance that draft ever would be applied, then why aren't women available for a draft? And if sometimes an emergency situation will happen, there would be no time for men to apply that women should be drafted too (obviously if something urgent happens then there is no time to change something). But, anyway, even if chance of being drafted is low, the citizens which are available for a draft should not be doing it for free. They should get som…
/r/MensRights02/03/17 06:51 AM
1

Don't worry, i was banned too xD
/r/MensRights02/03/17 04:13 AM
17

Guys, no one will help you not Trump, not Hilary, no one except you. Fight for your rights, and never fall back. We must take what belongs to us - equal rights, respect and obligations as women.
/r/MensRights01/03/17 07:39 AM
1

If you are in an open carry area of the US, and you have a gun on you, and you use that firearm to shoot someone, you will probably go to jail, unless you can demonstrate that you shot in self-defense. If you're a police officer, you have a tremendous amount more leeway than a normal person to shoot someone with a gun. Police officers take on the great responsibility to serve and protect us so that the rest of us can enjoy life; we're perfectly okay with giving them "extra" rights, your rights, …
/r/MensRights01/03/17 06:44 AM
1

Perhaps its more fair to say they were important to the survival of the people that owned them? Such as men are. Men are important for women as slaves, not as human. Ideally, you are correct: nobody is disposable. I want you to be careful with your wording when you say we are all equal though. I know what you're trying to say, but your wording is misleading. We are entitled to equitable treatment under the law, but we are not equal. If men are not equal and worse then women, should they agree wi…
/r/MensRights01/03/17 06:35 AM
1

In we are not equal and can't balance each other, then we must defend our rights and prove, that we deserve equal rights and obligations with women, that we are not worse then them.
/r/MensRights01/03/17 04:19 AM
1

We don't. Being required to act if your country needs men to defend it doesn't make us less important, it makes us more. Slaves were required to act too (if their master orders) - were they more important? I doubt. Important person is that lives in safty and wealth, not the one that goes to die. Yes, because men are reproductively disposable. Women are not. One man can sire 10 children, a woman can only birth one. Given our roughly equal birth rates, who is more disposable? No one is disposable.…
/r/MensRights28/02/17 07:59 PM
1

Your problem can not be solved alone from other men problems. We just can't defend our rights and let the world to hear us. So we must discover, create the strong men movement, and to do that we should show to as many men as possible that they are discriminated one way or other. Army conscription, draft, criminal punishment which hurts primary men - all these problems are terrible, but very few people understand it. So everyone should begin from himself and to become apostle of our movement for …
/r/MensRights28/02/17 07:33 PM
2

Is there a reason for men to be drafted?
/r/MensRights28/02/17 11:30 AM
1

There are different people here, but the best of us should help the others to find the right way. No one like whiners, who say, that everything is bad. So our goal is to make our job and to help men all over the world to avoid discrimination, which most of men are struggling today. Most men are weak, few of us are strong and we should show the others way for freedom, selfrespect and equality.
/r/MensRights28/02/17 07:25 AM
1

I think that every man has to care about himself, and don't tell the others who they should be. Theories about fat quality are just theories.
/r/MensRights28/02/17 07:10 AM
0

Were women ever seen as the property of men? In many cultures. For example, in the past, in some cultures if the husband of women died then she committed suicide. None of this compares to the way women were treated. Even today domestic violence sometimes happen. In the past the husbands beated wifes much more often. Historically, women were treated as children. They didn't have the same rights as men. But they also didn't have any of the same obligations or responsibilities as men. Elven history…
/r/MensRights28/02/17 07:04 AM
7

You can think what you want, but if you want to know the truth - i m the person who can not tolerate any injustice. I just want all people be equal - and that is fair position.
/r/MensRights28/02/17 06:26 AM
2

So you say, that men and women are not equal, and women are more important then men, so men should or are able to be discriminated? I don't agree with your opinion, i think that all people are equal no matter what sex they are. And if someone is better then the others he has to proof it by his life, not by the gender he was born. Men discrimination exists several hundreds years, but that is not natural order, millions of years men was considered as the ruler of humanity. If someone think that me…
/r/MensRights28/02/17 06:19 AM
5

Sorry if my English is bad, it's not my native language. I respect women who serve in army. And i have no such respect for women, who doesn't. I just want to say, that there must be more women in army. It doesn't matter who die women or men - we must evaluate equally every person, and, specially, heroes who protect us with their lives at the battlefield. I'm sorry for your loss.
/r/MensRights28/02/17 06:03 AM
1

I mean intrauterine device, i'll fix the OP, thx.
/r/MensRights28/02/17 04:57 AM
4

Yeh. But some of those obligations would be better off if neither of us did it. First of all obligations should be equal. Modern wars are waged by professionals. Not really - in many countries, where war happens, compulsory conscription for the men (but not women) happens.
/r/MensRights28/02/17 01:19 AM
1

A draft should include both or neither sexes. Absolutely. I agree with you that the whole idea women can't do it as well as men can is nonsense. The main idea is that if women can't do something - then they should have less civil rights. But i think that women can do the same the men can do. So they should have equal rights but and equal obligations. They will not be able to keep up with our physical standard and stuff at decent rates. Men at age 60 and children at age 10 participate at wars. Yo…
/r/MensRights28/02/17 01:11 AM
29

If women "forgot" pills and lied to men, then such a cases should be considered as a crime, fraud. That should be implemented into a criminal law.
/r/MensRights27/02/17 05:10 AM
1

Maybe women will free men from paying child support for removing men rights to restrict abortion. More rights is always good in the hard battle against men's discrimination. Some men want children, and giving men more rights is good too.
/r/MensRights27/02/17 03:32 AM
3

Thats good idea too, if some clinic makes men infertile, then it must take responsibility, if something goes wrong.
/r/MensRights27/02/17 02:52 AM
1

Its normal, if man has to pay full child support IF women decides not to make an abortion, then he has to have rights about decisions of the future of the fetus.
/r/MensRights27/02/17 02:51 AM
3

Often fat females look worse, then fat males (but there are opposite situations ofc). But why many people say that it is bad for a men to be fat, but no one says the same about women? There are peple, who think, that fat women are beautiful (bbw). I think there should be the same movement, that fat men are beautiful, or, at least acceptable, too.
/r/MensRights27/02/17 02:43 AM
14

Foreskin has twice more nervous endings then penis itself. So why is male circumcision allowed, and women's is not? Or male circumcision should be restricted, or women's allowed, to make both genders equal.
/r/MensRights27/02/17 02:37 AM
1

Do not 5 years in prison stay with you?
/r/MensRights27/02/17 02:15 AM
4

People can think whatever they want, but they should not say sexist words at public, or should be punished for it. So if someone do not want any man to babysit their children, they can find woman babysitter, but they should not say their opinion in public.
/r/MensRights27/02/17 12:41 AM
38

In such a cases (when there are no any evidance exept words of reporter) reporter of a crime should be considered the same possbile criminal as the suspect. So if women (or men) says she (he) has been raped or sexually assaulted, it should be checked at first isn't it false report.
/r/MensRights27/02/17 12:27 AM
1

In the past marriage gave for men not only obligations, but the rights. For example, sex between wife and husband couln't be rape. But today in process of sex women can very quietly say "no", so no one hears, and then say that she was raped by her husband. The other problem is with child support. In the past women had to sit at home and don't have sex with other men. But today, in marriage, women can have sex with anyone, and even if the DNA-test will show, that her husband if not the father of …
/r/MensRights27/02/17 12:07 AM
1

What about fake rape report culture? Rape is 1 hour or less pain, fake report = many years pain in prison. Many years is much more problem, then one hour. Fake report is the worst possible crime, because 1) Its a crime. 2) Unguilty person goes to prison. 3) Gilty person can't be punished. 4) After watching media other fake reporters feel free to make more reports.
/r/MensRights26/02/17 11:53 PM
2

Even if in the past men fight more (which is not the case, because, i think, the tribe, in which all members fight had advantage, which it proven by the Sarmatian female warriors), they had more rights and privileges for that. So if, today, women want equal rights, then they must serve in army too.
/r/MensRights26/02/17 10:21 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter