Wonderbacon Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
1	What would happen if men collectively took a day off It probably surged 5,000 employees in between these two years and she had a single month to document the data. Sounds about right. https://www.bls.gov/cps/aa2012/cpsaat11.htm Good luck with your life of telling people they are unworthy.	/r/TheRedPill	10/03/17 09:19 PM
1	What would happen if men collectively took a day off There is no 2013 data. That is the whole point. You HAVE to use the 2008 data. THERE NO OTHER DATA IT COULD NOT BE REPORTED BECAUSE IT WAS BELOW 50,000 EMPLOYEES. Since your incapable of locating data yourself and only look at the one table. Here it is, crazy, you just look for the year, rocket science. https://www.bls.gov/cps/aa2013/cpsaat11.htm Your argument that they would do a 3/4 split is so off point. You would do a percentage based analysis when projected into the future. Therefore only a…	/r/TheRedPill	10/03/17 08:04 PM
1	What would happen if men collectively took a day off I guess you dont understand what 'most recent data available' means. All the data is still available if you bothered to look beyond that one table. Follow all the years back and you'll find it was last reported in 2008. To lose approximately 8-9 percent of a workforce by gender over that time period is extremely unlikely. In fact, it would seem more likely the percentage increased as layoffs would generally have a larger effect the largest subgroup of employees (i.e. men). I have no idea how som…	/r/TheRedPill	10/03/17 02:39 PM
1	What would happen if men collectively took a day off You keep taking this too far. I said at the very VERY VERY VERY VERY beginning. That I got to where they said 100% of the of the employment sector is men. Which is wrong. So I stopped reading because CLEARLY whoever wrote it doesn't understand what they are talking about. You keep trying to say it doesnt matter if their numbers are right or not, which doesnt make any sense. If you have an argument based on numbers, and the numbers are WRONG. Then you have no argument. End of story. In any experi…	/r/TheRedPill	09/03/17 08:32 PM
1	What would happen if men collectively took a day off The point isn't at all what you're making it out to be. The point is, the stats are all wrong. The stats cited were misinterpreted by whatever idiot wrote it and apparently everyone who supports it in this thread. You cant say "if X is true, then the results would be...." when X was never true. Jumping to broad conclusions with provably wrong data is for religion, and it has not place in scientific analysis. I told you X could not be true based on the cited data, then provided actual data in whi…	/r/TheRedPill	09/03/17 06:16 PM
1	What would happen if men collectively took a day off ...each number represents 1,000. so 0 employees vs 5,000 employees.	/r/TheRedPill	09/03/17 05:29 PM
1	What would happen if men collectively took a day off Because her stats are not reported........ they both got dashes, if you read the footer it says that surveys under 50,000 are not reported, and they only had like 44,000......... the first stat cited was power operators and said it was 100% men. "Power plant operators, distributors, and dispatchers 44 - - - -" "NOTE: Estimates for the above race groups (White, Black or African American, and Asian) do not sum to totals because data are not presented for all races. Persons whose ethnicity is ident…	/r/TheRedPill	09/03/17 02:18 PM
1	What would happen if men collectively took a day off I literally gave you the most recent statistics available for the exact thing I was arguing, they posted their own, which when you dove into them, stated they did not have a large enough sample size to report. If you say X, and X is not true. Then that statement is false. If you read an article that opens with a clearly false statement, do you think "gee, one initial mistake, I bet the rest is good though"? No, you throw that shit out immediately because its garbage.	/r/TheRedPill	08/03/17 09:34 PM
1	What would happen if men collectively took a day off The original source didnt have a source. If the data isnt reported, you cant source it. How is that hard to understand? If I say that a cancer treatment has a 100% success rate, and 9% of patients die. What does that mean? It means that shit has a 91% success rate. Yes, I'm stuck on percentages because that was what the author used to validate the claims. How is that hard to understand? As for your server reference, that I'm 100% sure you dont understand, but I'll indulge. Servers are largely au…	/r/TheRedPill	08/03/17 06:52 PM
1	A Guide for Young TRP'ers It's okay kiddo. Just continue to overcompensate for your shortcomings rather than think objectively about the effects of your behavior on the psychological development of the little girls you're trying to hate bang.	/r/TheRedPill	08/03/17 05:47 PM
0	What would happen if men collectively took a day off Haha, you Red Pillers are always about half retarded like this. The fact is, it was not true. None of it was true. Why post something that is 100% false. When you say theres 0% of people in a occupational subgroup, and there is in fact 9%+, thats a significant difference in ANY statistical analysis. This post was the troll honestly. It's just false information. You're just salty that someone came here and refuted the claims made because it doesn't fit in with your misogynistic principles.	/r/TheRedPill	08/03/17 05:36 PM
1	A Guide for Young TRP'ers Hey man, when I was a little kid I wanted to get laid too. I didn't have to get all rapey though to make it happen, most girls just liked that I was smart, laid back, and cared about stuff. If you have to trick girls into liking you, then what does that say about you?	/r/TheRedPill	08/03/17 02:31 PM
0	What would happen if men collectively took a day off Haha, so someone who plagarizes an article and calls it truth isnt at fault for spreading false information? When you post an article that is absolutely inaccurate because they cant read the data, youre fucking retarded. End of story. doesnt matter who writes it, because he reposted it and its all wrong. If you write a report for work and you cite inaccurate statistics, you cant just say "well someone else used it, so it must be true." I'd be fired immediately if I said 100% of power plant opera…	/r/TheRedPill	08/03/17 02:20 PM
1	A Guide for Young TRP'ers Why not just you know, be a normal human and try to not channel your inner sociopath? Just because you lack self-confidence and are extremely self-conscience doesn't mean you need to resort to manipulative method. Maybe your dad left when you were young and you just don't know any better.	/r/TheRedPill	07/03/17 11:22 PM
-1	A Guide for Young TRP'ers Aww, you're butthurt. Slowly coming to realize this is all a crock of shit to get money? Just remember, thats really what all of this is about.	/r/TheRedPill	07/03/17 10:57 PM
0	What would happen if men collectively took a day off Hmm, here is the US Dept of Labor saying that is 100% false all the way back in 2008. Its obvious from the first line the OP was just making stuff up. You can check nearly every one of his statistics and it is just wrong. There is absolutely no source of information outside of this article that supports the claims made. So....maybe you should have read something from any reputable source before you came in guns blazing. On second thought, just keep doing you ;) "Power plant operators, distributo…	/r/TheRedPill	07/03/17 10:04 PM
-4	A Guide for Young TRP'ers Interesting. This sounds a lot like cult behavior. You guys have acronyms, your own definitions of things that couldn't be further from the truth, call it 'swallowing the pill' which sounds a lot like voluntary brainwashing, and only the top members are allowed to profit off of it all. Eerily similar to how Scientology works. There's a ton more parallels. But I mean, you wouldn't be able to see the, you've already drank the kool-aid, I mean....swallowed the pill XD	/r/TheRedPill	07/03/17 07:29 PM