TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Wonderful_One_9763 Archive

View 4 posts and 47 comments by Wonderful_One_9763 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

Both can be fixed
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/21 12:37 AM
2

According to who?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/21 01:42 PM
1

Exactly what he said was perfectly consistent
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/21 10:05 AM
3

Just because it's good for society and most people want it doesn't mean we're entitled to. If the the police decided to strike or stop working, that's their choice. If nobody wants to do the job we've gotta suck it up. So you're wrong we're not entitled to a protective police force.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/21 01:21 AM
7

You're consistent
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/21 01:11 AM
1

Is there really friendship inequality? Do you have any sources?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/21 11:56 PM
1

It isn't, which is why Democrats are always complaining about it (yet dismiss complaints about a very similar market). Did you even read the post?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/21 07:34 PM
8

I'm not against left wingers because I am one. I'm simplying pointing out a lot of the hypocrisy I've seen in blue pilled / female Democrats Also I already pointed out the hypocrisy of the Republican red pillers in my post
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/21 07:23 PM
1

You're the only bringing up sex slavery, not me. I already suggested sanctions on dating apps and legalized prostitution
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/21 07:21 PM
2

Both markets involve people
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/21 07:20 PM
4

Nice username
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/21 07:15 PM
4

People always assume the solution is rape, yall need to think outside the box (and gutter). Something as simple as regulating/sanctioning dating apps or shutting down the Match monopoly on these apps would be effective and doesn't require anything "physically intrusive".
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/21 07:14 PM
4

Who decides what's a need and what isn't in society? Honest question. Who are you to tell people what they are entitled to? Once you start assigning needs it becomes a slippery slope. Does a baby need physical affection (without which it will die)? What about a kid? At what exact age can you stop giving your kid affection? Are children entitled to loving parents? It might be needed for their development but are they owed love? Until what exact age aren't they?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/21 07:11 PM
4

Who decides what's a need and what isn't in society? Honest question. Who are you to tell people what they are entitled to? Once you start assigning needs it becomes a slippery slope. Does a baby need physical affection (without which it will die)? What about a kid? At what exact age can you stop giving your kid affection? Are children entitled to loving parents? It might be needed for their development but are they owed love? Until what exact age aren't they?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/21 07:11 PM
3

We currently have a free dating/relationship market. I don’t see what’s wrong with it. So let's make our economic market free then too. No regulations whatsoever. I don't see what's wrong with that.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/21 07:05 PM
0

It really isn't, it's just gatekeeping which issues can be discussed. I'd bet most people who recognize inequalities or injustices in society do not already have solutions in their back pocket. That doesn't mean discussions about it are any less warranted. Most women in America probably wouldn't even acknowledge dating is so lopsided for most men and if/once they finally do, they already expect a working solution for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/21 07:01 PM
2

People have to acknowledge there's a problem before solutions even become relevant. Dating apps have only recently exploded in popularity and showcased the drastic inequality faced by men in dating. Around that same time, the male sexlessness rate started rising and has just now become a talking point. That being said, you already mentioned one potential solution (legal prostitution) that's been proposed by plenty of men who want to address dating inequality. Another one could be breaking up the…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/21 06:06 PM
4

Those countries have a population of 5M each (combined, close to NYC population). So no, there isn't a great solution we know of for 1) socialism at a large scale and 2) getting America to be less afraid of socialism Both of those issues are part of the problem so there isn't a great solution yet
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/21 04:55 PM
14

Doesn't "life isn't fair" apply to everything then? So basically nobody should ever be upset, unhappy, or bother complaining? I don't think that's realistic
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/21 04:40 PM
4

Same, it's hyprocritical for men to be so aware and frustrated with one form of inequality but then dissmissive of another. But female democrats do the same thing as I explained
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/21 04:36 PM
4

Except dating & sex is often shared between a few men and many women, so it isn't 1 : 1 as you described it
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/21 04:34 PM
9

Exactly, yet Democrats (primarily women) spend a great deal of time and effort whining about economic inequality. An issue there is no great solution for. But when dating issues are brought up, all of a sudden it's "life's not fair". This is why most blue pill / female Democrats are hypocrites. Same goes for Red pill / black pill / male Republicans obviously
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/21 04:32 PM
3

The political will is part of the problem, so you don't know what to do to curb inequality
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/21 04:27 PM
2

I don't expect anything, I'm just pointing out hypocrisy
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/21 04:23 PM
2

Are you left wing or right wing? Man or woman? I think that left wing red pillers and right wing blue pillers are the exception to the hypocrite rule. But most left wings are blue pilled and most right wings are red pilled which makes their beliefs ironic
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/21 04:04 PM
3

At the end of the day, they're both based on people's selfish desires to maximize their circumstances
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/21 04:01 PM
3

Looking at dating apps (increasingly one of the most common ways to date), women face a Gini coefficient of 0.342 while men face one of 0.542. For context with analogy to income inequality this is the difference between living in the 75th most unequal economy vs. the 8th. That's how women are more successful Most people are in relationships, most people have just one partner. More than half of young people in America are single
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/21 03:58 PM
4

How have economic regulations been going in America so far? Wealth inequality has grown just like dating inequality has and it's been around a lot longer too (couple millenia). So even though they're different, they're similarly challenging to solve and easy to dismiss (ie. "Life isn't fair")
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/21 03:52 PM
9

Economic inequality is just a quality of life issue like dating inequality. Both having money and having an affectionate partner will boost your mental & physical wellbeing. Studies show that loving relationships actually have a greater impact on your happiness than having more money. You're downplaying the importance of love/affection in people's lives. Nobody is entitled to anything. Not money, affection, food, housing, clothes, or a job to support themselves. Dating inequality and economic in…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/21 03:45 PM
9

You're making a lot of assumptions here and none of them are relevant
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/21 03:35 PM
10

It's funny how you assume there is so much structure in economics when it's really just people acting off emotions (just like dating). Economic equality is voted in and written into law. In order for large scale economic changes to occur, broad populations have to agree that they ought to occur. This is so not true. There is not law regarding economic equality. Even if there were, economic regulations are rarely used against wealthy companies or individuals in any significant way. Robinhood want…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/21 03:34 PM
15

Ad hominem, care to try an actual argument?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/21 03:24 PM
3

I don't think forcing women to have sex with men is ever going to be a solution. You're the only one who keeps bringing this up, that's your idea not mine. The only solution I've suggested is sanctioning social media & dating apps but that solution would get a lot of backlash (like asking people to pay more taxes). The people who benefit from the system want to keep it this way
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/21 03:23 PM
3

Probably easier to just pose sanctions against social media & dating apps. They are a bigger issue than just dating inequality, they provide a lot of 'fake news' like covid conspiracies and make us look at our screens rather than at each other. But this would not be an agreeable solution for most social media users just like paying more taxes isn't a favored solution to reducing economic equality.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/21 03:17 PM
5

The dating inequality issue is similiarly difficult to our wealth inequality issue. If there was a great solution for the latter, where is it? This post isn't about coming up with solutions, but you have to acknowledge there are solutions that would make dating less unequal. But just like there are solutions for economic issues (paying more taxes), it's not going to benefit everyone (just reduce inequality). For example (I'm not saying we should do this): As dating apps & social media have becom…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/21 03:10 PM
1

one could level the playing field of economic inequality by giving equal pay. You want a communistic system where people are all paid equally instead of by merit? Not exactly as feasible as you think it
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/21 03:08 PM
19

The difference is that food, clothing, shelter, medical care, and adequate transportation to essential services are often considered necessities. Says who? Nobody is entitled to anything
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/21 03:00 PM
4

I mean that "life isn't fair" is just a dismissive statement and is used regardless of whether the issue can be fixed. The medical system is a great example of how "life isn't fair" is applied towards poor people who can't afford the medicine they need
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/21 02:54 PM
6

Just world fallacy
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/21 02:40 PM
2

No they just mean I don't want to think or care about it because it doesn't affect me. It doesn't matter how solvable the issue is
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/21 02:37 PM
8

You can't change human attraction just like you can't change greed, they're both selfish human behaviors. But you can change the system to avoid drastic inequalities
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/21 02:36 PM
7

You can change the tax system but that doesn't mean those taxes are getting paid (by the rich). There are all sorts of loopholes that companies and investors will use to get out of taxes. Social security is also funded through payroll tax so it's really only hurting the middle class. Fixing wealth inequality isn't an easy task just like fixing dating inequality, otherwise we wouldn't have either
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/21 02:34 PM
14

What's the difference? You can't change how greedy the rich is just like you can't change how picky women are. Both are just human behaviors
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/21 01:48 PM
–

Awww. Reddit is gay Take that mods
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/21 11:05 PM
3

Men also have to work harder to be charming than women. So women don't have to work had to be charming and thus are more likely to be boring
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 07:41 PM
3

Why does everyone entertain her ridiculous posts?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 07:29 PM
5

Why are far less women comedians than men?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 07:28 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter