TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

WoodChucking Archive

View 2 posts and 258 comments by WoodChucking on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
37

Marriage/DivorceWoodChucking/r/MensRights15/04/17 08:26 PM
5

Social IssuesWoodChucking/r/MensRights15/06/18 04:07 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
98

How can I be in a relationship with someone who hates my gender and me by association You can't. Get out now. Edit: I didn't mean to be this flippant. This is a major worldview difference between you two. Your reaction to it shows that you realize that there's no way this is going to work with this kind of fundamental difference between you guys.
/r/MensRights16/10/18 08:30 PM
362

I take the trash out in my boxer briefs and a t-shirt all the time. The nice thing about being old and married with kids is not having to give a crap at all.
/r/MensRights14/10/18 08:46 PM
1

I can't find anyone convicted or charged for too much birth control. Only for not using it when saying they are. So it's the partners fault if they're lied to. Nice victim blaming. Give it a rest. The original argument was about rape by deception. You can certianly feel betrayed and hurt. We're talking about something else. So if I have HIV We already discussed STDs previously and how that is a completely different thing under the law.
/r/MensRights12/10/18 04:06 AM
1

Hopefully you'd notice...
/r/MensRights12/10/18 03:45 AM
2

Which would imply that you need to disclose if you're on hormone birth control, lest someone have non-procreative sex against their will. This is clearly nonsense and not a requirement. Are there any religions that are OK with premarital sex but think homosexuality is wrong? Certainly not any of the major ones. Your morality is your business. Choose your partners wisely. None of this puts the onus on your partner to try to figure out your hangups and pre-disclose everything to make sure you don'…
/r/MensRights12/10/18 03:41 AM
2

There are way too many possibilities of something that might change your partner's opinion to put that responsibility on someone. Failing to disclose that you're married or in a relationship is clearly not considered rape due to deception based on the fact that it happens all the time and no one is arrested for it. An STD is a different animal since it directly related to the risk/danger of the sex act itself. I can't actually come up with a rational case that includes disclosing SRS that doesn'…
/r/MensRights12/10/18 02:02 AM
8

It is an interesting question, however. What information constitutes rape via deception? Heck, my wife and I've been married for 15 years, have two kids and I'm sure there are things about her that I still don't know. Where is the line on deception? It is not clear to me that a sex reassignment surgery is solidly on either side of it. The violence after the fact, however is clearly beyond the pale.
/r/MensRights12/10/18 12:28 AM
3

He addressed this point pretty near the top of the essay: So I thought, “What might I do in such a position?” Withdrawing, prior to a full investigation, did not constitute an acceptable option. But it’s not clear that accepting the position, given the scale of opposition to my candidacy (“my,” in my simulation of his situation). So what if the FBI cleared me, I received the nomination, but then decided that it might be best for medium- to long-term peace and the good of the country if someone w…
/r/MensRights11/10/18 08:06 PM
2

Not to mention that the Maryland State Police keep reminding people that a) there is no statute of limitations on rape in Maryland and b) if they receive a criminal complaint they will investigate it. They've never gotten one. Dr. Ford could've had her full investigation at any time. She could even still have it now.
/r/MensRights11/10/18 02:00 AM
8

It is almost like there is more to human communication than he words being spoken...
/r/MensRights11/10/18 01:55 AM
11

Bailey created this now-viral monologue after watching That's My Boy (which begins with a 13-year-old having sex with his female teacher). In the monologue, Bailey's character, Will, is fictional, but his story is based on the actor's own experience. https://www.refinery29.com/2014/03/65400/male-rape-video-andrew-bailey
/r/MensRights10/10/18 10:46 PM
119

The video is infinitely more powerful. Always post the video.
/r/MensRights10/10/18 02:01 PM
-12

if somebody punches you and you retaliate, it’s self defence No, that is retaliation. retaliation - "the action of harming someone because they have harmed oneself; revenge." synonyms: revenge, vengeance, reprisal, retribution, requital, recrimination, repayment; response, reaction, reply, counterattack Self defense requires that you believe there is a continuing threat and need to defend yourself.
/r/MensRights05/10/18 12:58 PM
1

No, I mean the Daily Mail makes shit up regularly and gets into circular citations with other unreliable sources. Like in this case, it really happened, but we couldn't know that until I found the original report in the Oregonian. Any accuracy in a report by the Daily Mail is purely coincidental. Like I said, if the Daily Mail is your only source, you don't have a source.
/r/MensRights05/10/18 12:48 PM
5

Maybe we could refrain from linking to videos by white supremacists?
/r/MensRights05/10/18 04:47 AM
1

It's a pretty easy one the let them step into since it was actual policy during the Jim Crow era.
/r/MensRights04/10/18 03:20 PM
8

The ground floor window thing is just weird. My wife is still asleep and the ground floor window in the bedroom has been mostly open for months. These people should live some place with better weather and less shitty people. The response to this whole nonsense should be that no, you're not going to be out carefree frolicking in the night. You're going to be employed doing all those shit, overnight jobs that are overwhelmingly done by men. First off, a big chunk of women are going to be working s…
/r/MensRights04/10/18 01:46 PM
0

Everyone should own a big dog. Big dogs are awesome.
/r/MensRights03/10/18 10:33 PM
10

And in all that you didn't even mention '4th Amendment train wreck'. That should've been enough on its own. But no one involved in these hearings actually gives a crap about that. My biggest concern in bouncing him is that he was probably the best option on Trump's short list.
/r/MensRights03/10/18 05:48 PM
53

87.5% of police officers are men. Who do they think will be enforcing this curfew?
/r/MensRights01/10/18 05:15 PM
8

It took a few seconds to find a better source. If the Daily Mail told me my own name I'd go fact check it. If your source is The Daily Mail, you don't have a source.
/r/MensRights30/09/18 05:03 PM
11

If you have to resort to The Daily Mail, you're just admitting there's no real source. Here's the original report by the Oregonian.
/r/MensRights30/09/18 04:25 PM
8

I am not aware that this was ever a thing. I don't see anything out there talking about it. Do you have a link to something discussing this? I certainly would believe that there are universities that have different SAT score requirements for men vs. women as part of their admissions criteria.
/r/MensRights29/09/18 01:42 PM
1

You can label anyone you want anything you want at anytime due to the 1st amendment. If Kavanaugh is charged with a crime and goes to trial, he will be presumed innocent until proven guilty in the eyes of the law. People, however, can think whatever the hell the want about him.
/r/MensRights27/09/18 01:11 PM
0

Last year, Hillary Clinton slammed Russian president Vladimir Putin for manspreading. Just in case you've forgotten why voting for HRC was a non-starter. (Disclaimer: in no way should anyone read this as any kind of endorsement of Donald Trump)
/r/MensRights26/09/18 04:07 AM
5

I realize that this wasn't in the US, but this is all why the SCOTUS says that speech is protected until it reaches the level of 'incitement to imminent lawless action' (Brandenburg v. Ohio (1969)). Brandenburg is specifically about two KKK rallies where the speakers advocated "Personally, I believe the nigger should be returned to Africa, the Jew returned to Israel." and the potential need for 'revengence' if the racial/ethic direction the US was taking didn't change. This was a massive step fo…
/r/MensRights25/09/18 04:07 PM
2

NYPD Assistant Chief Juanita Holmes said two knives were found at the scene. Someone with two knives should be pretty happy.
/r/MensRights21/09/18 11:39 PM
13

That is what I wanna know. The article says just defunding. I can support that. However, Euronews reported that as of September 2019, the government would no longer finance gender studies courses. The defunding of the program will impact ELTE, though CEU is privately funded and can continue its program uninterrupted. CEU, a U.S. accredited academic institution founded by American billionaire and founder of CEU George Soros, a target of Orbán’s and many other global right-wing campaigns. Banning …
/r/MensRights21/09/18 03:16 PM
1

Probably would've been a good idea to include some of the footage of no one batting an eye.
/r/MensRights20/09/18 03:27 AM
5

It is astonishing that we got a good way through the 21st century before anyone would consider having a superhero, or a time-travelling, two-hearted Doctor, or anyone vaguely competent in combat and killing, who was a woman. We don't count all the female X-men (Rogue, Jean Gray, Mystique, Storm, Psylocke, Kitty Pride, Jubilee, Wanda, Domino), Black Widow or Wasp?
/r/MensRights20/09/18 12:24 AM
-4

Screen shots also make it hard fro the reader to find out the details of what happened thus forcing the reader to do OP's job of just posting the full story. If the only example that we have it from 28 years ago, I'm less concerned. If there's one from this year it would carry a lot more weight. Posting a screen shot with none of the detailed and pertinent information is just stupid. Basically OP either just believed some screen shot he saw or he went to extra effort to make this rather than jus…
/r/MensRights19/09/18 03:49 PM
-7

I'm so uncomfortable with the historical truth of it that I did OP's job and found an actual article about the incident he posted about. If you're concerned about it still happening today then go find a contemporary article about such an incident.
/r/MensRights19/09/18 03:46 PM
6

28 years ago... Stop posting screen shots and go find the proper article about these things.
/r/MensRights19/09/18 01:25 PM
7

This woman also asked. From what we see above, there is no indication that anyone was viewed nude without their consent. I'm not really seeing the distinction you're making.
/r/MensRights19/09/18 02:24 AM
9

I had a old girlfriend (I've been married for 15+ years now, so this was a long time back...) who always wanted to draw me nude. She didn't want me to model, tho. Just be nekkid while doing whatever it was I was going to be doing anyway. Since my default state at home is sans clothing anyway this worked out fine. So there are several sketches out there of me sitting in my office chair, feet up, surfing the web while naked.
/r/MensRights18/09/18 11:26 PM
4

How many genders do bots have?
/r/MensRights17/09/18 06:11 PM
17

Harassment? How is it not sexual assault?
/r/MensRights17/09/18 01:10 PM
3

Why would you even want to circumcise a bull?
/r/MensRights16/09/18 11:52 PM
16

Unless she's claiming rape, the woman she's talking about also consented to sex without a condom as much as the men did.
/r/MensRights16/09/18 04:31 PM
5

I'm mostly fed up with how boring superhero movies have become. I read all these stories in the comics years ago. The action sequences are a small part of the books and yield some of the best art. In the movies, tho, they're interminably long and pointless and repetitive and dull dull dull dull. I haven't been to see any of the big Marvel movies since Civil War. I can be bored for free at home. Diversity doesn't enter into it. The first season of Jessica Jones, for instance, was fantastic.
/r/MensRights15/09/18 03:10 PM
26

This is shocking news to anyone who's never actually met and interacted with humans...
/r/MensRights15/09/18 02:58 PM
3

You just open the WaPo link in an incognito window. It's pretty simple. With yours, I had to google the headline to find it and then open it with an incognito window. Works for the NYT and most local news web sites with an article limit. Not to mention the effort you had to go to to get the screen shot of it in the first place. Just put the link in and it's easier for everyone and we actually know the details of what you're referring to .
/r/MensRights12/09/18 07:16 PM
340

after she repeatedly expressed frustration That is an odd way to spell 'ranted like a lunatic'. Is there some reason why we're posting screen shots of headlines instead of links to the actual articles lately? It is really annoying. Just link to the thing you want to talk about.
/r/MensRights12/09/18 01:47 PM
12

She's 24. I have no idea why OP posted an image of a headline rather than the link to the article.
/r/MensRights12/09/18 01:15 PM
1

It is already part of his estate. How is she going to get it without having at least some claim to the estate already?
/r/MensRights11/09/18 10:16 PM
1

It all seems needlessly complicated. Treat it as any other asset of the deceased and dispose of it like anything else to the next of kin or by the terms of the deceased's will.
/r/MensRights11/09/18 09:01 PM
2

This is probably not the article to bitch about. There are a few places where they refer to specific studies about women/pets, but for the most part they're very careful to refer to 'family violence' and the like For instance this passage is fairly typical of the tone of the whole story: “You have to be aware that it’s sometimes a suspicion rather than something that’s been disclosed, but if there is non-accidental injury, there could be a serious situation at home that involves the safety of pe…
/r/MensRights11/09/18 12:52 PM
20

"We know that there's quite a history to it. Think of John McEnroe, think of Ilie Nastase, Jimmy Connors, Andre Agassi. McEnroe retired 24 years ago. Nastase retired 33 years ago, Connors retired 22 years ago. Agasi retired 12 years ago. So is she's saying that the problem of abuse of officials is a solved problem now and she's being treated like any other player today?
/r/MensRights09/09/18 01:40 PM
17

womanmanipulating So close... 'womanipulating' Way punchier.
/r/MensRights07/09/18 10:30 PM
528

The longer I work in banking, the more that I feel that I'm being made to make a choice: the ability to conceive, or the opportunity to become an MD. She's completely right. This is the choice she has to make. So make your choice and live with the outcome. People make choices like this all the damned time for all kinds of things.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 05:30 PM
3

It certainly does point out how pathetically cookie cutter our sound bites have become.
/r/MensRights03/09/18 02:31 PM
37

It is simple. Men learn early on that you don't complain about 'small' things because you should just 'man up'. When you know your complaints won't be taken seriously you stop making them public and you don't seek help. Men need to be told repeatedly that if you need help, reach out and you will be taken seriously. And society need to follow through. The phrase itself is not relevant. The societal attitude is.
/r/MensRights01/09/18 08:02 PM
12

As Movember begins... And here I thought it was August...
/r/MensRights30/08/18 01:21 PM
23

In this case, tho, the man could not give informed consent either. He did not consent to having sex with an underage girl. By the logic you state, she raped him.
/r/MensRights29/08/18 06:17 PM
10

Whut? Speaking as a big, fat guy, I just went shopping at Target for clothing last week. They catered to me just fine. I had to go buy clothing cos my big, fat ass is less big and fat. I needed XL instead of XXL so my pants didn't fall off and my shirts weren't hanging off of me. The XXL stuff I was replacing was also mostly bought at Target.
/r/MensRights28/08/18 05:22 PM
2

It is a word that is used. So is 'cunt'. So is she ok with that now?
/r/MensRights25/08/18 04:42 PM
3

OP specifically mentioned clitoral removal, which is why I addressed that point. Read for content and context before freaking out. No one here is defending anything.
/r/MensRights23/08/18 11:56 PM
6

Yes, but normal circumcision (including that done by Jews) doesn't remove the head of the penis. It removes the foreskin, which covers the head. This tends to result in some loss of sensitivity of the head itself and of course all of the sensation from the foreskin.
/r/MensRights23/08/18 11:28 PM
18

I am not Jewish and I don't really give a crap about disrespecting the Jewish faith. If your faith tells you to mutilate a baby or child of any gender, then it deserves some disrespect. I don't think it is fair to say that circumcision is equivalent to clitoral removal, but it is on that spectrum. Having said all this, I am circumcised and I'm not particularly angry about it. The idea that I would have my son circumcised when he was born, however, was unthinkable.
/r/MensRights23/08/18 11:23 PM
8

And that is pretty fucked up...
/r/MensRights23/08/18 05:43 PM
13

The penis owner unless thee is a bona fide medical decision to be made. That this is even a question is pretty fucked up.
/r/MensRights23/08/18 05:02 PM
3

Seven years ago, when he was 4, TheBoy decided that Princess Peach was his favorite Mario character. He needed a new lunch box and found this one at Target. He loved it and was so proud of it. I stashed his old, red Mario lunch box in the garage since I knew what was coming. 2 days later he asked me if he could go back to his Mario lunchbox. So yeah, pink is just a color and he's got to live in a world that considers it a girl color.
/r/MensRights22/08/18 05:55 PM
5

It is weird that after all this time the 'one drop rule' is still a thing.
/r/MensRights20/08/18 12:14 PM
0

And...?
/r/MensRights11/08/18 07:52 PM
5

Is throwing an ashtray at and slapping someone not assault in Australia? It is a crime in the US already.
/r/MensRights02/08/18 12:13 AM
49

And yours is even a step back from the old formulation. "It is better that ten guilty persons escape than that one innocent suffer" -- Sir William Blackstone (1765)
/r/MensRights29/07/18 03:49 PM
-4

Four and half years ago I would have loved such an inclusive parking space when it was just myself trying to get a spot close to the store with my infant daughter. Ya know that you can just park there anyway, right?
/r/MensRights22/07/18 07:19 PM
3

This is also a problem with the only other example they came up with : Hillary Clinton. Unless the context is completely clear referring to her as 'Clinton' runs the risk of confusing her with her husband. Hillary, otoh, is very clear. There is no other Trump that confuse him with. That they couldn't come up with an example (Clinton/Curie) that doesn't have this problem is telling.
/r/MensRights20/07/18 01:08 PM
3

Ya know what? Me too... "everyday I read the newspaper and I just think, like, brothers, what’s wrong with you guys?" Like the idiot former Presidents who keep yapping and saying stupid shit. What is wrong with you guys?
/r/MensRights18/07/18 05:53 PM
67

I never physically touched in any way, much less had sex with, the woman who accused me of raping her. How is that "unclear" exactly?
/r/MensRights11/07/18 11:10 PM
7

I'm pretty sure that that if you only counted the career of the Three Stooges you'd have more comedic acts of violence against men played for comedy than all the ones against women in the history of movies and TV.
/r/MensRights05/07/18 03:46 PM
6

The problem with soccer is that FIFA bans women from playing on mens teams. There is no good reason for this to be the case. Were a women good enough to play, then let her play. This is already the case right now in the NBA, NFL, NHL and MLB. All 4 are open league with no gender requirement. FIFA, however, requires that soccer leagues be gender segregated. The number of women who are anywhere even close to those levels is minuscule. Haley Wickenheiser played hockey in the Finnish 2nd division. M…
/r/MensRights04/07/18 02:14 PM
7

Hence the clever little word 'if' that I used. Neither you nor I have any idea if this was the case or not. If it was the case, tho, it is a big deal. The comment I replied to specifically went with 'does it matter?' deflection. Yes. Yes, it does matter.
/r/MensRights03/07/18 07:54 PM
3

If that decision was made based on his sexual orientation rather than the facts of the crime he committed, yes, it matters quite a lot.
/r/MensRights03/07/18 04:31 PM
5

The income differences between people with 4 years degrees is so vast that using it as a comparison is useless. I'm sorry, but your 4 year degree in education just isn't interesting enough to compare it to all the STEM people who're in high demand. According to DOE, the median salary in 2014, for a non-STEM degree holder was right at $50,000. In any case, a married couple of two high school teachers at media income is in the top quintile (which starts at about $100K) for US household income.
/r/MensRights02/07/18 03:07 PM
6

Pure nonsense. High school teachers in the US had a media income of $58,030/yr in the US in 2016. Th US median household income for 2016 was $59,039. So basically a single teacher salary puts your household right at the median.
/r/MensRights02/07/18 02:39 PM
6

The one where lynching is considered an option is the less civilized place.
/r/MensRights30/06/18 07:36 PM
9

It isn't because the gender issue isn't relevant here. He should be focusing on what she needs to do an an individual. That this behavioral trait is more common in women than men isn't interesting (in this context), relevant or important. A timid man needs the same kick in the drawers as a timid woman and presents the same risks as an entrepreneur
/r/MensRights26/06/18 12:33 PM
3

The thing they refer to specifically says the USMNT. When they say 'the men' they're referring to the national team. You have to be deliberately obtuse not to understand this. FFS, let it go. The US Men's team does suck and failed to make the World Cup by losing to Trinidad.
/r/MensRights22/06/18 01:48 PM
1

Why would you want Peter Noone from Herman's Hermits to feel bad?
/r/MensRights22/06/18 12:56 PM
20

Except the part where the USMNT sucks (lost to fucking Trinidad in a must win...) and the Women are the best women's team in the world. If those tables were turned no one would bat an eye at flipping this statement.
/r/MensRights21/06/18 06:29 PM
7

Yes, we get it. You're an asshole.
/r/MensRights19/06/18 07:35 PM
12

This has nothing to do with pronouns and is about a preferred name. This guy is clearly full of shit. There is no religion anywhere that bans nicknames and requires use of the name on someone's birth certificate. If a student has a preferred name, you use it. End of story. If you refuse to do so, you're just an asshole. He's the one who made it a trans issue.
/r/MensRights19/06/18 03:42 PM
6

The whole idea of a strict dress code like that is just weird anyway. I've never had a job where I had to wear a tie, much less a suit, and I won't ever take one. 25 years ago, I was told I would need a tie for a business trip we were going on. One of the upsides of being from New Mexico is that you absolutely can get away with a bolo tie.
/r/MensRights19/06/18 02:47 PM
-5

And so what? Good for her.
/r/MensRights18/06/18 08:58 PM
8

Under most rape laws, no. It might well be sexual assault or battery, tho. Here is CA's Sexual Battery statute for example. This is one of the bits of the whole Brock Turner thing. People keep calling him a rapist and yelling about how his sentence was insufficient for rape. And they're right. But he didn't rape anyone. There is no evidence that he raped anyone. He was never tried for rape. (He was initially charged with rape, but the DNA evidence didn't match his so the rape charges were droppe…
/r/MensRights18/06/18 03:50 PM
1

I went to high school in Houston, TX in a building with no AC and we weren't allowed to wear either shorts or skirts (John H. Reagan High School, recently renamed Heights High School). I don't remember roasting. Am I supposed to believe that the UK is hotter than SE Texas? There might well be a gender issue here, but everything I've seen about it is ridiculously hysterical.
/r/MensRights17/06/18 02:52 PM
20

Toni Atkins, the California state Senate president pro tempore, who supports the legislation, has spoken up for the bill on the Senate floor, reportedly challenging the room flat out: “Why is it so hard for us to try and make the case that women in leadership and women on corporate boards could have a positive impact on your bottom line? I don’t know why I have to stand here and actually plead.” If this is really true then there is no need for this legislation. Companies that do it will outperfo…
/r/MensRights16/06/18 12:47 PM
31

The funniest thing about this is that according to Rotten Tomatoes, it was positively reviewed by 68% of the 207 reviews that they counted. Not great, but hardly terrible. The audience rating, tho, is 50% positive.
/r/MensRights16/06/18 03:16 AM
4

Democrats can't get themselves to stop pushing gun control and identity politics so people hate them. Republicans can't get themselves to stop pushing abortion and some other stupid shit so people hate them. If either party managed to tell its idiot Wing to STFU they could have a looooong political monopoly.
/r/MensRights16/06/18 12:34 AM
78

Speaking as a hiring manager in Silicon Valley many women do get hired to fill out diversity. I know many, many skilled, dedicated, hard working women in the Valley who got where they are by being the best. But I've also been told, point blank, by HR VPs that 'diversity is a job requirement'. No one has ever told me 'you must hire a woman for this req', but it has been made pretty clear to me on 2 separate occasions that I would be hiring the female candidate by executives who were not otherwise…
/r/MensRights15/06/18 04:49 PM
401

I sort of half agree with the subhedline. It is as relevant as Mothers day... Which is to say irrelevant. Ditch them both. We could do with way fewer "days".
/r/MensRights15/06/18 02:41 PM
1

Nothing the article mentions has anything to do with gender. It is all generic cycling infrastructure issues. One big step where I live is that the county has decreed that if any of the local municipalities do any road constructions (down to even just repaving) they must add bike lanes to the street. If there is a practical reason not to add the bike lanes, they must file a report with the county supervisors to explain why it can't be done. The county can then override that if the reason isn't s…
/r/MensRights12/06/18 02:10 PM
5

maybe it’s time for us to go all Thelma and Louise and Foxy Brown on their collective butts Yes, please drive off a cliff. Amusingly the plot summery of Foxy Brown reads : Foxy asks her Black Panther brothers for help. They take Steve and cut off his genitals So Foxy's solution was to get men to do the heavy lifting? What an amazing tour de force of feminine power. Did she actually see either of these movies?
/r/MensRights11/06/18 01:40 PM
17

Never do it on the bathroom floor. Do it right out in the open, as close to the manager's office or customer service desk or whatever as you can. The shittier the diaper, the better. Force them to see it and deal with it. It only took one 'Excuse me, sir. What are you doing?' from the floor manager at my local Target before the changing table showed up in the men's room.
/r/MensRights11/06/18 01:17 PM
5

What business does a woman have being the chairman of an event that is supposed to appeal to men? Does it? I don't know any straight men who care a whit about it. I know lots of women who do, tho. I went hunting for demo info on viewership and couldn't find a gender breakdown.
/r/MensRights06/06/18 04:12 PM
6

A man may choose to mutilate himself, yes. What of it? People choose to do all manner of things that I would consider bad.
/r/MensRights05/06/18 01:49 PM
12

Let's see what ole Mr. Dictionary has to say: mutilate: "to injure, disfigure, or make imperfect by removing or irreparably damaging parts" So, how is "mutilate" not apt?
/r/MensRights05/06/18 01:34 PM
16

Things change all the time for non-policy reasons. If you're relying on generation old data, you're flying blind. That you'd even question this is pretty sad and indicative.
/r/MensRights04/06/18 02:00 PM
36

This is my sheriff. I live 4 miles from her office. I've lived in Santa Clara county for the last 23 years. I've been up for the last 90 min and, as is my habit, I flip on the news as background noise. Your post is the first I've heard of it. I just flipped over to Channel 7. We'll see if they're running it on their morning news. Edit: ok, that is a whole 30 min news cycle from KGO and not a word about it.
/r/MensRights04/06/18 01:25 PM
51

The biggest thing that jumps out at me from this is that you have sources listed from the late 80's and early 90's. The state of things 25 or 30 years ago is not particular relevant to today. For instance the last line says 'There are: 11,268,000 total U.S. custodial mothers and 2,907,000 total U.S. custodial fathers. This is clearly not true. There were that many 27 years ago. A new born baby from when that statistic was compiled could well be one of the custodial mother or fathers today.
/r/MensRights04/06/18 01:17 PM
1

Oh, sure. you should disparage her as you see fit. The difference is that you're not damaging a child's relationship with their parent. Sounds like your mom did a good job doing that on her own.
/r/MensRights04/06/18 12:30 PM
-5

So wear skirts.
/r/MensRights04/06/18 02:18 AM
2

The high road doesn't enter into it. If you're disparaging a parent to young child, you're the asshole. 'But she does it, too' is a cop-out. Whether you're mom or dad or other friend/relative doing it makes you the asshole.
/r/MensRights04/06/18 02:07 AM
16

It is no more acceptable to disparage a mother to a child than it is for her to disparage the child's father.
/r/MensRights04/06/18 12:50 AM
8

Back in the mid70s, we moved from California to Oklahoma. I was in 4th grade. In CA, my 3rd grade teacher would have us sit and meditate after recess and to try to find our center. It was basically like you'd expect from CA in the 70s. The first day in my new school some guys were screwing around in math class. The teacher got fed up with them and called them up to the front of the class, took down his paddle and popped them good right in front of the class. He told them to go back to their desk…
/r/MensRights31/05/18 01:07 PM
8

It also feels like eventually this place will be banned People around here have been fretting over this exact sentiment for several years now. Somehow it never happens. This sub is 10 years old now.
/r/MensRights28/05/18 02:42 PM
2

Witness testimony is piece of evidence. Are you seriously claiming it isn't? That would explain why you're so confused about this.
/r/MensRights26/05/18 08:37 PM
-1

Her word, left unchallenged, yes, was presumed to be true. Which is why they challenged it with other evidence. If this were about his thigh, foot or shoulder, no one here would be batting an eye over over any of this. This is no different.
/r/MensRights26/05/18 08:09 PM
-4

facepalm No, it isn't. The defense counsel's point is that the prosecution had met the burden of proof for a conviction. Beyond a reasonably doubt. The defense's job was to pull the balance back into reasonable doubt territory. This really isn't that complicated.
/r/MensRights26/05/18 08:02 PM
101

Because victimhood is power. You can't blame a victim. Acknowledging someone else's victim-hood gives them power. Since they feel this is a zero sum game, someone else gaining power reduces theirs.
/r/MensRights26/05/18 05:42 PM
2

Did you not read the article you posted? “It became clear the only option we had was to just have him stand up and show this to the jury,” Bussert said after court adjourned Friday. “It was not something he wanted to do. It was humiliating, to have an African American stand up in court and show himself. It had racial issues. But he understood why we made the request. It allowed the jury to see the evidence.” In the opinion of his defense counsel, this was his only option.
/r/MensRights26/05/18 04:35 PM
16

Luckily someone out there is tracking it all so I don't have to start recording Wendy. Wendy Williams Slams Britney Spears For Denying Ex More Child Support No clip, tho. I like Hot Topics. I have no idea why. I don't even know who 80% of the people she's talking about are. I really need to get a new job...
/r/MensRights26/05/18 04:17 PM
-6

Without seeing his dick, there was enough evidence enough to convict him. His dick was the evidence in his favor that contradicted the prosecution's ID of him and created the reasonable doubt. By your logic all exculpatory evidence is entered under duress.
/r/MensRights26/05/18 04:12 PM
-10

"Man enters exculpatory evidence at trial" is a better headline. He wasn't compelled by the court to do anything.
/r/MensRights26/05/18 03:29 PM
36

Wendy Williams, of all people, went off on a bit of a rant earlier this week on this story about how Britney Spears needs to stop nickle and diming Kevin Federline and increase her child support payment. She specifically went into how this wouldn't even be a question if the genders were reversed. That was kind of surprising.
/r/MensRights26/05/18 01:23 PM
8

Writing for The Daily Bell, Joe Jarvis explains that there is proof that ADHD is nothing more than a fake disease. So a nutball health site citing a conspiracy theory site... Well done.
/r/MensRights24/05/18 12:53 AM
2

Birthrates fall as a society gets more wealthy. We've seen this over and over again over the last 100 years. This is also why economic growth is how you reduce overpopulation concerns. The reason, despite the hand wringing nonsense that is getting thrown around, is economic security. Economically insecure people need lots of children to ensure that they will be taken care of in thier old age. Economically secure people don't.
/r/MensRights22/05/18 01:15 PM
20

This begs the question... No, it raises the question. Begging the question is something else entirely.
/r/MensRights11/05/18 08:14 PM
20

While I suspect it is possible to write a shittier article on this topic, I'm having some trouble thinking of how it would be worse.
/r/MensRights10/05/18 01:02 AM
2

The benefit gap between prostate and breast cancer does exist, but isn't anywhere near as big as it is made out to me. From the NIH, you can see that we should be focusing on lung and colon cancer. (The full report is here.)
/r/MensRights09/05/18 11:20 PM
2

We do? I feel like maybe I'm not keeping up my end of the deal, then...
/r/MensRights09/05/18 10:32 PM
6

Many major professional sports in the US don't have men's leagues. This case as I'm describing it is exactly how the NBA/WNBA and the NHL/CWL are set up right now. FIFA is the outlier in forbidding women to play in the men's leagues. None of MLB, NHL, NFL and the NBA are men's leagues. They're open leagues that only have men playing in them. Basically you have a solution in search of a problem.
/r/MensRights03/05/18 04:48 AM
3

There are plenty of existing men's league at the lowers level already. The existence of a lower level women's only league is a tacit admission of the fact that the women will never be of the same quality as the men in almost all sports. If there is ever a case where men cannot generally compete with the top level of women, you'll have a point.
/r/MensRights03/05/18 03:53 AM
3

Because only one of them matters. The men are flat out better than the women and always will be. There might be some women capable of playing at a higher level, but never enough to support a professional league anywhere near even a semi-pro men's league.
/r/MensRights03/05/18 03:50 AM
2

For soccer, any FIFA sanctioned league (which this league (the PDL) is part of US Soccer, which is sanctioned by FIFA) cannot allow women to play on a men's team and vice versa.
/r/MensRights03/05/18 01:46 AM
-1

This isn't true. Heck, it ins't even true if you restrict it to Europe. This wasn't even true in the UK until a bit over 30 years ago.
/r/MensRights03/05/18 01:44 AM
11

The shelter one is a good one, tho. Those folks can use all manner of things and pads (and other toiletries) aren't something that anyone thinks to donate. Taking them goods that they can use is always appreciated. One Thanksgiving, we had a mix up in our party planning and ended up with two people bringing a 16# ham. Our local shelter didn't bat an eye at taking one of them and getting it served. Ask them what they need most.
/r/MensRights03/05/18 01:35 AM
5

Kaiser Permanente asks me every time I'm there and whenever someone new sees me in the same visit. The intake nurse and then the doctor and then the next nurse who is doing whatever the doctor ordered and so on...sometimes 2-4 times per visit). It is often enough that it would be kinda annoying, but I appreciate that the do it for everyone and apparently always. I think the pharmacy techs are the only people who don't ask about it.
/r/MensRights30/04/18 02:14 AM
2

How often do I skip class? I haven't skipped a class in over 25 years.
/r/MensRights26/04/18 04:44 PM
2

No, the standard is 'beyond a reasonable doubt'. There is a large gray area between 'reasonable doubt' and 'absolutely proven guilty/innocent'. Just because someone is convicted doesn't always mean they were lying about how they didn't do it. Just because someone is acquitted doesn't mean that the accuser was lying. Even if you assume that the jury and court process worked flawlessly, which of course it doesn't, there is still that gray area of uncertainty.
/r/MensRights19/04/18 04:50 PM
7

I was at a strip club in Albuquerque once and had my hands to the side and out of the way during a table dance. The women then, unintentionally I think, sat on my hand. I had no idea what to do, but within a coupla seconds the bouncer was right there to make sure that I was aware that this was unacceptable and that there wouldn't be a second warning. What goes on in a private dance is more negotiated and open to different options depending on where you are and the particular establishment. IME, …
/r/MensRights18/04/18 01:11 PM
10

Why would we support that? Every team I've coached has been co-ed.
/r/MensRights15/04/18 01:03 AM
105

There aren't many versions of Leonard who turn down Penny. Depends on for what? A romp in the hay or a short term fling? You're right. That isn't what Penny is worried about. There are lots of version of Leonard who walk away from the ditzy, pretty girl because at the end of the day, she's boring. Leonard, as he gets into his late 20s/early 30s (Leonard is supposed to be 27yo when the series starts), is a serious catch as a long term partner/spouse. That is what Penny frets over. In the episode …
/r/MensRights13/04/18 09:25 PM
497

I only watched the first few seasons, but the character who appreciates Leonard the most is Penny herself. There are several episodes where she feels intimidated and inadequate compared to him and his accomplishments. I always thought of it as everyone else only sees the superficial outside view, but Penny knows who she is and why she doesn't compare well to him. Yes, she could get a hotter guy in the sack at will, but she knows Leonard is out of her league.
/r/MensRights13/04/18 08:14 PM
10

and keep their contact information current can be sentenced to five years in prison We're supposed to be keeping our contact information current? Is there some kind of form or something? I registered in 1987 like I was supposed to and never did anything else. I moved a few months later and have bounced around the US ever since. I'll be 50 this year, so I don't think they care about me anymore. I guess I got away with it.
/r/MensRights10/04/18 12:57 PM
174

Jesus... If she would read her own article, she'd figure out that she is a colossal bore. "just one of the five languages I speak", "supposedly tired of me dominating dinner-party conversation", "I went to one of Britain's most academic girls’ schools, Godolphin & Latymer, where I got three top A-levels, then breezed through an Italian and French degree at the University of Kent, getting a 2:1, while keeping up conversational German on the side", "My bedside table has always buckled beneath the …
/r/MensRights07/04/18 02:38 PM
5

Because that is the start of the legal process. The prosecution will take the evidence that they have to a grand jury. The grand jury will, presumably, return an indictment. The indictment will allow the case to move forward to a criminal trial.
/r/MensRights07/04/18 02:02 PM
5

Give credit where credit it due. That's a pretty solid joke.
/r/MensRights28/03/18 05:20 PM
2

I had this drilled into me for so long that I would feel uncomfortable walking on the inside like that. It doesn't occur to me that I should be on the outside because it is the proper etiquette. It's more that it just feels weird.
/r/MensRights27/03/18 06:54 PM
0

There are plenty of lower level soccer leagues that a man can play in already if they're not good enough to be in the top leagues. you have to get pretty far down before you're playing for as little as the women's soccer leagues are paying. If all the lower divisions were open to all people, there would be no point at all in a women's league. I've always thought one of the issues that the WNBA has is that if any of these women were even close to NBA quality, they'd be playing in the NBA or in th…
/r/MensRights21/03/18 05:48 PM
6

There shouldn't be a rule against women in professional sporting leagues. There is no reason for it. If a woman can compete, then she will compete based purely on merit. Women, in general, cannot compete in professional sports at the highest level. This is no way justifies banning a woman from those leagues. Today there is no rule against woman playing the NBA, NHL, NFL or MLB. Cammi Granato, for example, was invited to try out for the New York Islanders. She turned the invitation down for basic…
/r/MensRights21/03/18 04:22 PM
5

Because you've distilled billions of people into two buckets of stereotypical views and behavior. Some women will fit one bucket. Some will fit the other. Some will fit neither. Some men will fit one bucket. Some will fit the other. Some will fit neither. Cheap, moronic generalizing isn't helping anything.
/r/MensRights11/03/18 07:00 PM
91

It has been posted here (along with the video of it) a jillion times... And I'll upvote it every time...
/r/MensRights06/03/18 09:55 PM
23

Not even a little bit.
/r/MensRights28/02/18 01:32 AM
16

Or take some time to take him to Goodwill to buy that suit/razor yourself and tell him to save the money he's already got. If it is a scam, he'll find any excuse to not go with you. The entire scam hinges on no one taking the time.
/r/MensRights26/02/18 01:51 PM
11

Are you looking for sympathy for it here? Infant circumcision is genital mutilation without consent. If you decide on having yourself circumcised when you're older, that's your business.
/r/MensRights26/02/18 03:24 AM
29

Yes, he should, but them's the rules. FTA: Beggs had asked to wrestle in the boys’ division, but the rules for Texas public high schools require athletes to compete under the gender on their birth certificate.
/r/MensRights25/02/18 04:16 PM
28

The Olympics tend to skew towards women in viewership so the advertising follows suit. The 2010 Winter Olympics, for instance, was 56% women and 44% men. By comparison, that same year the Superbowl was 54% men and 46% women (says Neilsen).
/r/MensRights21/02/18 05:06 PM
34

Florida, not Texas.
/r/MensRights16/02/18 07:36 PM
29

Maybe it needed rescue, maybe it didn't. This woman threw out a life line just in case it was needed. If the the approach was not making the woman uncomfortable (or in this case not what it seemed at all), then it is an easy 'oh, thanks, but I'm still working out here. You go on ahead.' If it was making her uncomfortable, it gave her an easy way out without any social awkwardness. There really isn't a problem here.
/r/MensRights08/02/18 05:33 PM
22

Or you mistype the word “fishing” and end up with a bunch of links to “fisting” videos. Yes, that is how you found all those fisting videos...
/r/MensRights08/02/18 02:58 PM
26

Men and women communicate differently. More exposure to the differences while learning to navigate language is a good thing. I would also wonder how much of the improvement is specifically in boys, rather than across the whole school population.
/r/MensRights21/01/18 07:16 PM
23

She asked a lot of really good, probing questions. If she removed the entire 'So you're saying <something ridiculous that no one was saying at all>' follow up question from her repertoire she could be a pretty great interviewer. As it was, she comes off as an ignorant shrew. Dr. Peterson is right, tho. Props to Channel 4 for posting the entire thing rather than selected excerpts.
/r/MensRights21/01/18 03:59 PM
13

The age of consent in Texas is 17, so that point isn't relevant here.
/r/MensRights12/01/18 03:25 PM
11

Does anyone know the exact question that they asked? My first reaction was to wonder who are all these people willing to push anyone off of a bridge in the first place, regardless of gender.
/r/MensRights26/12/17 01:44 PM
4

Like they do every year... Come Jan, they'll have forgotten all about it until December of next year.
/r/MensRights16/12/17 10:54 PM
2

You don't have to imagine it. There is a perfectly normal +20 point comment of 'guys do this too' and no one flipped out over it.
/r/MensRights09/12/17 02:01 PM
0

The argument is that HIV was singled out for being a felony and they were making HIV the same crime (misdemeanor punishable by up to 6mo in prison) as any other disease.
/r/MensRights07/12/17 02:45 PM
4

I had an HR VP I used to work with flat out tell me 'sometimes diversity is a qualification'. We'd interviewed a woman who was perfectly well qualified for the position and the topic came up that my department was 100% male. (IT, ~40 people). This candidate wasn't the best candidate we talked to, but she was very close. So we ended up hiring her.
/r/MensRights29/11/17 03:09 PM
41

My 13yo daughter can let fly with the best of them. If you fear for your safety due to the volume of someone else's fart, you're a pathetic human being. Trumpet loud and long, ladies!
/r/MensRights26/11/17 03:34 AM
1

While yes, she did say that, her comments on the the whole thing are generally pretty positive and supportive. She starts talking about this issue at 4:07 of the video.
/r/MensRights17/11/17 02:41 PM
1

First off, HP hasn't been one of the premier companies to work for in probably 30 years. I've lived and worked in Silicon Valley for the last 22 years. I've had 4 female direct manager (our of 9 managers). I've worked for companies big, small, start ups and long established. I've been in management for the last 15 years. I'm sure this kind of thing happens sometimes, but I've never seen or heard from anyone I know of it happening. No, I've never softened what I say for when or analyzed everythin…
/r/MensRights29/10/17 09:49 PM
6

This is why there should just be an 'open' division and a girls/boys division. Anyone who is good enough should compete in the open division and the rest are less competitive to the level of the people playing. This is how it is now in hockey. There are no gender rules in the NHL/AHL/ECHL and there is a women's league.
/r/MensRights26/10/17 03:07 AM
228

So they failed so hard that they had to resort to claiming pigeons and a table were offended? What did they think would happen? Men rarely receive any positive affirmation of their sexuality and suddenly a reasonably attractive, young woman does so. If they're shocked at these results, it is because they know so little about men. Yes, no one learned anything, including the people who made the video.
/r/MensRights24/10/17 02:00 PM
2

So get to know them. Once you have a job, be the guy handing resumes to the hiring managers. Now you not only know someone, you know someone who owes you a favor. Repeat... If you're recommending good people, after a while you'll be someone people ask 'hey, we need a <x>. know anyone?' 'I don't know people' is a lame, milquetoast thing said by people who would rather mope than do something useful.
/r/MensRights23/10/17 12:46 AM
2

You shouldn't be wasting your time applying for jobs anyway. Network your ass off and have someone known to the hiring manager hand them your resume. It quit often really is about who you know. Be that person who knows people.
/r/MensRights23/10/17 12:39 AM
4

I'm not trolling anyone. If people're going to post bullshit and fail to understand consent, then I'm going to call them out on it. If Men's Rights means, to you, the right to ignore consent and sexually harass people, then yes, I'll call you out on it. I'm not even sorry if this gets in the way of your circlejerk.
/r/MensRights19/10/17 09:41 PM
24

Why is this sub defending this guy? His (at least) boorishness has been well known for decades. So you managed to find some pictures of professional actresses not looking uncomfortable enough for you while in front of a camera. So what? Or are you just discovering that Hollywood is superficial, fake and all about projecting an image?
/r/MensRights19/10/17 03:24 PM
1

Did you not read the very thing you posted? "Most men are good. But then there are the douchbags who ruin it for everyone." is somewhat semantically different from "Tinder is labeling all men as douchbags"
/r/MensRights19/10/17 02:34 AM
2

I've only seen two of them out of well over 100 women. Even I'm willing to say that seems low, so I'm not sure how this is helping their point. I know of the men I'm FB friends with that way more than 2 have been sexual assaulted or harassed.
/r/MensRights16/10/17 01:55 PM
2

Lots of people set boundaries on what they're willing to do in bed. Consent is not binary where 'ok, anything goes now.' It doesn't matter how you feel about it. "don't touch my breasts" means do not fucking touch her breasts. If this is not OK for you, then don't have sex with her. If this kind of thing is a difficult for you to grasp, you're probably better staying celibate for the time being.
/r/MensRights16/10/17 12:31 PM
10

Christ... How many more times are we going to post this bullshit? https://www.rt.com/uk/406384-tinder-indecent-assault-sex/ The victim, who said she was left bruised after the encounter, accused the then-trainee doctor of using “excessive force” after she had explicitly told him not to touch her breasts. Wasn't consensual.
/r/MensRights15/10/17 09:33 PM
1

That wasn't confrontational. That was a cheap joke on an opening the width of 5th Avenue. Did you really not see that response coming? Let it never be said that I let a cheap opening pass by unexploited. Edit: BTW, I upvoted you. How will people see my hilarious rejoinder if you're downvoted into oblivion? Edit2: I suppose I should mention that, having been born in the US in 1968, I am also circumcised. I'm not really upset about it in any way either. My life's turned out well enough that I don'…
/r/MensRights13/10/17 04:53 PM
69

Maybe I’m missing something? Your foreskin?
/r/MensRights13/10/17 04:29 PM
3

This is a false dichotomy in that the characterization of one of them is false and the push to the viewer is to actively side with one or the other. They can easily both be bullshit. But if we're not going to be honest about the story on the left, why even bother at all? In any case, are you seriously asking me to pick between which is worse: sexual assault, stabbing, lying in the press or a miscarriage of justice? Why would I do that? Are are heinous. This post should've been massively down-vot…
/r/MensRights13/10/17 04:16 PM
316

The victim, who said she was left bruised after the encounter, accused the then-trainee doctor of using “excessive force” after she had explicitly told him not to touch her breasts. Except that it wasn't consensual. This was actually in the 1st paragraph of the link you posted.
/r/MensRights12/10/17 05:30 PM
26

During the sex, the doctor grabbed the woman's breasts, causing bruising [...] Philip Queree, 37, was taken to court for repeatedly grabbing the woman's breasts and pulling her hair while the couple had intercourse. [...] Despite consenting to having sex with Queree, the victim told him she did not want her breasts touched and accused him of using 'excessive force'. So not consensual? OTOH, it is The Daily Mail, so God only knows if a word they're saying here is true. But even by their outraged …
/r/MensRights11/10/17 01:35 PM
11

"If you want it to happen then it isn't rape."
/r/MensRights05/10/17 09:41 PM
52

So for a coupla other mild inconveniences I can skip the 10 day waiting period I already have and only wait for 48 hours? Seems like a reasonable trade. Headline: "Kate Hudson favors reducing waiting periods and eliminating back ground checks for gun buyers."
/r/MensRights03/10/17 07:52 PM
1

I've never heard of it happening.
/r/MensRights27/09/17 02:27 AM
2

I've lived and worked in Silicon Valley for over 20 years. No, it is not realistic. While sometimes it seems very small, this Valley is way bigger than people think, esp since the term largely encompasses the whole SFBA at this point. It is not just Google, Apple and Facebook. There are 1000s and 1000s of companies in the area. Mostly if you're useful and network well, someone will hire you.
/r/MensRights27/09/17 01:54 AM
30

So for the first time ever I was hospitalized this last weekend (staph infection/103F fever. I don't recommend it.). I was asked on at least 5 separate occasions if my home was a safe place for me (which I failed to understand the question at first. I though they meant like did I leave loaded guns out on the table or something like that...I was pretty feverish.) or if I was subject to any abuse at home. I think that is the first time I've ever been asked that ever. (at Kaiser Permanente's Santa …
/r/MensRights13/09/17 11:15 PM
3

She accuses him of "paving the way" for Trump to cast her as a corrupt corporate stooge deserving of the nickname "Crooked Hillary." Seems like Hillary did a fine job paving the way for this over the last 30 years.
/r/MensRights07/09/17 04:34 PM
47

Fundamental rights and equality for all people are everyone's business and concern.
/r/MensRights05/09/17 04:03 AM
2

"Sometimes diversity is a qualification." -- HR VP in Silicon Valley that I no longer work with
/r/MensRights25/08/17 03:59 PM
2

That's a woman? Fer reals?
/r/MensRights25/08/17 02:54 PM
3

Seems like something maybe you should go over there and ask them.
/r/MensRights10/08/17 09:33 PM
5

There's all sorts of different color of women in it... It looks a lot like a female version of my IT department.
/r/MensRights08/08/17 01:27 AM
40

My department is almost exclusively male (I'm an IT Director). This should shock no one, since we almost never even get any resumes from women. I'd guess I've had about 65 people total in my department over the last 9 years (current staff is about 40). There have been 3 women in that time. I'd an HR VP (who is gone now) once tell me that 'Sometimes diversity is a job requirement.'
/r/MensRights07/08/17 01:42 PM
12

There are several versions of FGM. They're all illegal in the first world. Some are directly comparable to circumcision. Circumcision is just fine in the US. You're ok with cutting up a baby's genitals, bot only if those genitals belong to boys. So you're a sexist asshole and in favor of genital mutilation.
/r/MensRights30/07/17 10:41 PM
25

Cutting off part of a person's genitals without their consent? Sound about the same to me.
/r/MensRights30/07/17 10:31 PM
5

Probably shouldn't call it the Nice airport after this...
/r/MensRights30/07/17 10:08 PM
23

Go over to 2XC and tell them you're OK with FGM and dont get why they get so pissy about it. See what happens. Now try to explain how circumcision is different.
/r/MensRights30/07/17 09:54 PM
23

A movie about women in WWII? That'd be WAC! rimshot
/r/MensRights30/07/17 03:32 AM
-2

And they'd ignore you. There's a frickin' jillion forms you have to sign to even get the kids on the plane in the first place where it very clearly spells out who they will release to. I would hope the reasons for this would be pretty obvious. If you're not on that list, it doesn't matter if you're God himself and it is going to take a while to resolve. This is just an hysterical idiot who got caught in an annoying paperwork issue.
/r/MensRights22/07/17 02:12 PM
17

He didn't die from an assault. He died from being murdered.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 07:52 PM
2

This whole thing is even stupider because of how easily a normal person with a functioning sense of humor could turn this into a playful discourse on power imbalances either between bird species or between genders of geese and turn it back to their agenda. A humorless douche, OTOH, will get mad about it.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 01:27 PM
-3

Then prepare to be disappointed a lot or avoid restaurants. This seems an intensely foolish hill to choose to die on.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 07:11 AM
7

It is somewhat odd to strictly adhere to it for a group that large, but women ordering first is normal restaurant etiquette.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 06:59 AM
-6

Regardless of what you think of Milio, I wouldn't accept Carlin or Bruce as a source, ether.
/r/MensRights13/07/17 05:11 PM
47

“He would work 16-hour shifts, seven days a week just so he could save up enough to take us all to Disney every year. He was so worn out but he would do anything just to see us smile. “But the hours he was working were just getting too much. He was so exhausted all the time and he was running himself into the ground and his health was going downhill fast. “When he came home that night he was a mess, I have never seen him so exhausted. I couldn’t stand seeing him like that and I got angry. There …
/r/MensRights11/07/17 02:42 PM
3

It's fine. How would I know any different?
/r/MensRights10/07/17 03:09 AM
3

Not worldwide. No one can write their name in the snow in south Texas.
/r/MensRights09/07/17 07:35 PM
1

There are literally 2 other posts on the front page of this sub right now on this topic. There are probably 8-10 per day.
/r/MensRights08/07/17 12:18 AM
0

My daughter's seen me naked a jillion times. We're pretty lax on clothing around here. She's 13 now and chooses to cover up a lot more than the rest of us. I've mentioned this many times in various parenting forums. No one gives a shit.
/r/MensRights03/07/17 10:04 PM
115

Maybe I'm just confused, but I didn't see this covered in the article, Those numbers only add up to 73%. Is this implying that 27% of food parcels were given to single dads with children and unaccompanied children? Am I missing another group? Not including the full breakdown seems weird.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 11:07 PM
3

I have no idea why anti-circumcision people always say that about wanking...unless you and I're just amazing masturbating prodigies. (I am pretty good at it...) I've also been told that it is impossible for me and my partner to orgasm simultaneously due to being circumcised. Umm...whut? And yes, my son is uncut.
/r/MensRights29/06/17 10:27 PM
12

The rape rate in the US, according to the FBI unified crime report, was 25.2 per 100K people for 2013. If you assume every rape victim is female this means it would take 334 years for 1 in 6 women alive today to be raped. OTOH, math and logic are tools of the patriarchy, so be careful.
/r/MensRights25/06/17 05:00 PM
1

Race and gender don't enter into it. We're down one dumbass now. "Don't go to North Korea" is one of the easier "don't be a dumbass" rules to follow, It is on par with "don't tea bag a rabid Rottweiler".
/r/MensRights25/06/17 02:31 PM
1

My HR departments kept poking me about taking time off. For both of my kids (two different employers) I liked very close tot eh office, so it was better to take off an afternoon or a morning here and there as needed. I was completely out of the office for about a week for each and that was fine.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 07:14 PM
28

I dunno about MRAs, but I got one put into my local Target. Change a shitty diaper on the floor by the customer service counter and things happen. "Excuse me, sir. What are you doing?" 'Changing a diaper. No changing table in the mens room.' "Oh...ok..." And two weeks later there was one in the mens room. I see no reason to be milquetoast about this. If they don't like it, they can damned well install a changing table that I can use.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 07:11 PM
2

Arlo in The Good Dinosaur in 2015, Pete in Pete's Dragon in 2016.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 07:06 PM
2

How many are adversely affected or how many of us feel like we're adversely affected. I've never had any problems due to my circumcision, I don't remember it and it's never been an issue. So how would I know if I'd been adversely affected or not when I have nothing to compare it to?
/r/MensRights13/06/17 06:32 PM
1

Almost everyone smokes weed According to Gallup, the actual number is 13% of Americans say that they currently smoke marijuana. 43% say they've never used it ever. No, not 'almost everyone' smokes weed.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 03:43 PM
19

released just hours before Thursday’s rampage, the 24-year-old talked extensively about his depression and about who he was as a person—a transgender woman who hated men and toxic masculinity. So then why do they keep referring to the shooter as male? I count 12 usages of he/him in this article.
/r/MensRights10/06/17 09:05 PM
13

His statement is still true. For many liberals any opposition for any reason is 'hatred'.
/r/MensRights10/06/17 02:45 PM
10

Bringing chocolates now would be a bad idea since it is obvious pandering. Laying the groundwork for this kind of thing needed to happen months or years ago. Getting in good with the admins and HR is a) easy and b) incredibly useful. Never forget your HR reps birthday. Never forget Admin Assistants Day. Drop by just to chat now and again. Keep it it light. Know everyone's name. Know thier kid's names. Corporate life is so much simpler when the admins and HR like you.
/r/MensRights01/06/17 05:27 PM
3

Should or shouldn't doesn't enter into it. This is how it works. This has been the case since Usenet. Most users never say anything and just read what other people have written. Heck, in this thread right here, there's maybe a dozen or so people talking, but there are 100s or 1000s reading it. For that matter, think back to the big debates of the 1800s, say the Lincoln-Douglas debates. The goal was not for Lincoln and Douglas to convince each other. It was to sway the audience. You and i can arg…
/r/MensRights31/05/17 01:01 PM
93

Social media isn't about convincing the person to whom you're responding. It is about the unwashed, silent masses that see it and don't know any better. If you let it go unchallenged all of those people see it and it's now in the back of thier heads and eventually becomes normalized.
/r/MensRights31/05/17 02:33 AM
20

Nice scare quote around 'attacked'.
/r/MensRights30/05/17 07:22 PM
9

Yes, you would rightly be locked up if you responded to that with a physical assault. Gender doesn't enter in to it.
/r/MensRights19/05/17 01:07 PM
20

Well, then you should put on your big girl panties and grow the hell up.
/r/MensRights17/05/17 11:59 PM
8

My wife's dedication to pumping when she went back to work was amazing. We bought a deep freeze to keep it all. We got to the point where she was able to go on 4 day business trip and I could handle it all just fine just relying on frozen breast milk. When my daughter was weened, I threw out almost 1/2 gallon of extra frozen milk. We live very close to a milk bank and discussed her just continuing to pump to help them out. But turns out, pumping 3x/day at the office is pretty terrible. She was w…
/r/MensRights16/05/17 02:41 PM
20

If any of my managers threw a fit over 8 min for someone who was in 15 min early, they'd be the ones getting bitched out. I would prefer, of course, that my people let me or their manager know 'hey, I was in early, so I'm ducking out a few minutes early.' In any case, if 8 min is a big deal, shouldn't there be a time clock that shows exactly when he was in and out?
/r/MensRights12/05/17 03:12 PM
-11

"I know him" doesn't make applying the force of the law to someone less illegal. There is a risk of violence at every police interaction. This is why you don't initiate a traffic stop without reasonable suspicion. The guy didn't know it was someone he knew when the lights went on behind him. The force of law and the State is not a trivial thing, so stop using it for trivial purposes.
/r/MensRights06/05/17 04:08 PM
-9

"Black man not shot during illegal traffic stop" Gotta take your victories where you can get them. (I mean, congrats to that dude and all, but I hate this nonsense where the cops perform an an illegal stop for something unrelated.)
/r/MensRights06/05/17 04:01 PM
4

An illegal traffic stop is something to smile about?
/r/MensRights06/05/17 03:58 PM
2

HRC will always be the candidate so bad that she lost to Donald Trump. How close it was, the total votes cast and what ever don't matter. She Lost To Donald Trump. How shitty do you have to be for that to even be close, much less lose to him?
/r/MensRights03/05/17 11:41 PM
3

No, me. Except I'm taller...
/r/MensRights01/05/17 12:37 PM
39

Especially when my kids were sick, just holding them skin on skin made a huge difference in a way that was completely different than my wife holding them. On several occasions I'd spend most of the night reclined in the rocking chair trying to keep a sick kid asleep while I tried to nap off and on. Skin on skin (well...hairy skin...) contact made a huge difference in them sleeping.
/r/MensRights01/05/17 03:31 AM
1

seeing shirtless men on the streets in the middle of the city is an everyday, common thing And why would I care even if it were an every day thing?
/r/MensRights19/04/17 10:53 PM
7

It was actually years later before I found out specifically what she said I'd supposedly done. When no one bit, she just let it go and went about her life. Everyone told me that it was unbelievable and stupid and not to worry about it. Probably near 10 years later I met a friend of my wife's. She had been friends with $psycho and surprised that I was the guy who'd been accused of committing so many 'atrocities'. I told her that no one had every actually told me what I supposedly did, so she told…
/r/MensRights18/04/17 03:38 AM
8

Heck, the tweet from Marissa is without 'domestic' even. #maybehedoesnthityou but he gets mad at you for not following his rules even when you aren't together anymore
/r/MensRights18/04/17 12:15 AM
9

Several years ago, I was accused of rape by a woman. Luckily for me, no one we knew believed her and everyone answered her accusations with "no, he didn't". It was a few years later when it dawned on me how easily that could've gone completely sideways really quickly and there would've been very little I could've done about it. (She had been alone with me in my apartment, but I never touched her, much less slept with her.) Realizing that standards of evidence don't apply in these cases was proba…
/r/MensRights18/04/17 12:08 AM
27

From the article: When that marriage exploded, Diana’s superior instincts for wooing and handling the press insured that Charles emerged as the villain of the piece. But it seems safe to say that the union visited equal misery on both parties. One of the chief marital shocks for Charles was Diana’s lack of deference. He had assumed that the slightly vapid teenager he was settling for would at least be docile, but she turned out to be the biggest bully he had encountered since Gordonstoun. She ta…
/r/MensRights15/04/17 08:26 PM
11

Ask me why i got banned from the_donald today Nobody cares.
/r/MensRights09/04/17 03:51 AM
-2

If your only source is The Daily Mail, you don't have a source. If you have another source, you shouldn't use The Daily Mail as a source. Seeing as the alternative is to just deny all benefits for a 3rd child, this seems the better option. Of course, it all comes down to 'give me money' in the end.
/r/MensRights06/04/17 03:03 PM
8

Brock Turner was not convicted of rape. He was never even charged with rape because what he did isn't rape. His sentence was completely in line with a first offense for the crime he committed. He was let out in 3 mo because that is how the CA penal system works and nothing to do with rape culture. So how did Brock Turner get caught, arrested and convicted in a rape culture? The victim in this case doesn't even remember the incident. Turns out, he was caught when two people saw him and intervened…
/r/MensRights04/04/17 03:26 PM
8

At the top league level, almost certainly. But FIFA has actually blocked women from playing in the lower leagues. You certainly can't expect women to jump directly into the top level leagues if they're not allowed to play in the lower levels. Even someone like Hope Solo basically admitted your point when she was saying that she felt like she could play in the USL. She's probably the best female goalie ever and even she doesn't think she could compete at the MLS level. The MLS isn't exactly the c…
/r/MensRights02/04/17 03:27 AM
12

In some sports they can't. Cycling is one where some of the women's times are equivalent to the men's times in some events, but the events are separate and the prize money way less for the women. Any woman who wants to should be allowed to attempt to qualify for the highest level events and compete if they're capable. FIFA also prevents a capable woman of playing on a mens team. This issue doesn't come up in the NHL, NFL, NBA and MLB because the top leagues aren't segregated. It is just extremel…
/r/MensRights02/04/17 02:59 AM
16

Everyone should be returning the toilet to its fully closed position when they're finished with it.
/r/MensRights19/03/17 01:25 PM
17

Griselle Pizarro could seen chasing her former boyfriend around his pickup truck in the parking lot of the Jehovah’s Witness temple, carrying a .40-caliber handgun. Now compare this to the hysteria over 'stand your ground' self defense laws.
/r/MensRights18/03/17 02:27 PM
15

The weirdest thing about this installation is that the charging bull is supposed to represent economic progress and growth in the markets. And the girl is standing in its way.
/r/MensRights09/03/17 03:14 PM
8

At the end they note that we should allow for integrated leagues. This is, of course, mostly the case in professional team sports in North America. MLB, the NFL, the NBA and the NHL do not disallow anyone to play based on their gender. FIFA, however, does not allow this in professional football and has blocked it from happening in a few cases. This is why it comes up wrt soccer and not other sports. Having said that, tho, even Hope Solo, who probably is the best female goalkeeper ever, didn't th…
/r/MensRights08/03/17 01:19 PM
1

Don't objectify Jumbo's beard for its assist and passing capabilities, shitlord!
/r/MensRights07/03/17 03:20 PM
14

it's encouraging people to objectify others based on their physical and sexual capabilities I'm watching the San Jose/Winnipeg game right now and totally objectifying others based on thier physical and hockey capabilities for my entertainment. So what?
/r/MensRights07/03/17 02:54 AM
45

They are both in their early 30s and last December they bought a house together. The logical next step, thinks Jane, would be an engagement They bought a house together before getting married? worries that if she confronts Mark, he will pack his bags and leave Where is he going to go? He saddled with half of the house. These people are pinheads.
/r/MensRights05/03/17 04:59 PM
10

granted not in silicone valley Silicon. Silicone is the boob job stuff. I have worked in Silicon Valley for the last 22 years and you're spot on about professional networks. I've several women in mine, but they're all highly qualified and competent so there's never been an issue. Even without the explicit admission, everyone know who these people are.
/r/MensRights05/03/17 02:52 AM
3

He seems to not even be looking at Taylor Swift, but over her shoulder and directly at the camera. Which makes sense since he's walking along behind some woman and people're suddenly pointing cameras in his direction.
/r/MensRights20/02/17 07:32 PM
3

What State are you in? The first thing you need to do is make sure that you're legally allowed to record her without her knowledge.
/r/MensRights11/02/17 06:07 PM
1

You let yourself be detained by a school security guard?
/r/MensRights04/02/17 03:01 AM
3

Cammi Granato, one of the top female hockey players ever, was invited to training camp by the New York Islanders. She declined and pointed out that she was significantly smaller than the smallest player in the NHL and there was no way she could legitimately compete at that level. Manon Rhéaume did play a few pre-season games in net for the Tampa Bay Lightning and managed to perform reasonably well. However, she was, iirc, 8th on the Lightning's depth chart when they were hit with a slew of injur…
/r/MensRights04/02/17 01:44 AM
11

Her talk would be more effective if she didn't get short of breath by just standing and talking.
/r/MensRights03/02/17 06:57 PM
2

They don't seem to be defending her. The article concludes Don’t these people understand statutory rape is crime? Nevertheless, there are Facebook pages filled with thousands of people defending Vera. Luckily their support means little to the judicial system, and Alexandria Vera has now been sentenced to 10 years in prison.
/r/MensRights18/01/17 03:04 PM
17

Say what you want about Ross, but he was completely correct. They were on a break! And who the hell likes Ross? He a pathetic, obsessive, whiny human being.
/r/MensRights15/01/17 05:27 PM
2

In the traditional trolley problem, your only possible actions are to flip the switch. There is no other way for you to impact the outcome of the problem. In the bridge trolley problem, however, you are also right there. You're choosing to kill someone to save 5 people, but there is another option. You could jump onto the track yourself to save the 5 people. That is why pushing the person onto the track 'feels' wrong but flipping the switch doesn't.
/r/MensRights13/01/17 12:17 AM
1

1 in 6 is 16 2/3%.
/r/MensRights06/01/17 03:36 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter