| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | Laying out the bare minimum needed to be done for male rights to match everyone else's and organizing?Paper/financial abortion There are quite problematic edge cases with an opt-out system, so we'd be much better off pushing for an opt-in system based on parenthood consent instead. I know that asking for the bare minimum can feel like the safer choice, but in this case it's not the least disruptive solution. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 15/12/23 05:56 AM |
| 1 | This article is full of great resources for debate & thought/self growth.25% is the self-reported rate. (which appears to be consistent across multiple countries) In terms of convictions, it's way lower, only 5%. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 26/08/23 12:16 PM |
| 3 | Men supporting abortion rights by sharing their stories… and still getting shamedThere is an important distinction here between bodily autonomy ("I don't want the risks of pregnancy or birth") and reproductive rights/autonomy ("I can't / don't want to be a parent"). There are unfortunately a lot of people who pretend like these are are the same issue in order to dodge the more nuanced discussion which also involves male reproductive rights. The former involves birth prevention, while the latter is about termination. Those are not the same thing. They're only connected by cir… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 05/05/22 02:21 PM |
| 5 | If you're going to be Pro-Choice, be Pro-Choice for both parentslegal paternal surrender. Or rather parenthood consent, because parental surrender is not really a tenable position. It assumes consent unless the person actively opts out, yet the person may not have even been informed, which quickly turns into an ugly mess of exceptions and deadlines and people getting screwed over on both sides. The better solution is to simply to require opt-in consent. If you don't have their consent, there is nothing to argue about. If they do consent, then we can start ta… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 05/05/22 12:36 PM |
| 19 | Feminist Group Discuss Destroying Opponents Using #MeToo False Allegationsfalse rape accusation It's worth noting that swedish libel laws are broader than american ones and can apply in cases of truthful statements. Instigating a MeToo style witch hunt is not necessarily considered protected speech and can result in the person being ordered to pay damages. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 08/07/21 05:53 AM |
| 11 | Rights that men don't have (but women have)Here's a thought experiment: If fetuses could be transfered to an artificial womb through a procedure comparable to abortion (thereby circumventing the bodily autonomy argument) would she then advocate for a complete ban on abortion from the moment of conception? (or at least requiring consent from the biological father for it to be an option) That's essentially the reality men live under currently, so if she actually feels that way, she shouldn't have any objections. After all, "it takes two pe… | /r/MensRights | 27/09/20 05:02 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter