TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Woolly_mammoth_ Archive

View 0 posts and 245 comments by Woolly_mammoth_ on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

Honest question: Where is this paranoid hysteria coming from about states keeping their citizens from going to other states to get abortions? How does this even work? Do you have a source for this? What legislation is there that would allow this? Do you people understand the concept of state sovereignty? Do you understand that a state cannot dictate to another state what happens in that other state? Do you understand that a state cannot keep its own citizens from going to other states? DO you un…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 05:07 PM
-1

Dude, the only thing that's changed is that you no longer have a federal constitutional right to murder fetuses. If you really want to kill that baby so badly, go to a state that will allow it. Easy peasy.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 04:54 PM
-3

Trust me, dude - no one is going to be at your state's border asking why you're going to that other state. No one is going to ask whether you're going to that proabortion state to murder babies. No one from California is going to be asking why that preggo woman from Arizona is coming in on I-10. Relax, Chicken Little.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 04:52 PM
2

He cares about substantive due process, not whether gays are fucking or marrying each other.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 04:51 PM
7

We were beyond fucked 40 years ago
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 04:44 PM
4

Because the supreme court is a court, and not a legislative body. *facepalm
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 04:43 PM
-1

*WAVES HANDS People: Relax. Your antiabortion state is not going to pass legislation that will ban you from going to a proabortion state to get abortions. That's NOT POSSIBLE. That simply cannot be done. No state can forcibly restrain its citizens from traveling to other states to do lawful activities in other states. No state can even ask you why you're going to that other state. No state can even ask you why you came to their state. No state with an abortion ban can keep you from going to a st…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 04:39 PM
0

Bullshit. No state can ban its residents from traveling to get abortions. No state can ban its residents from traveling for any lawful purpose. No state can ban its residents from traveling to do something that's illegal in that state but legal in another state. BULLSHIT. That is NOT how this works. Any law like that will get struck down the moment it's challenged. BULLSHIT This is utter BULLSHIT. If it's illegal in Iowa to smoke weed, Iowa cannot ban you from traveling to Illinois because you p…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 04:31 PM
2

I am married and have 2 kids - I know more about all this than you ever will Whatever.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 04:25 PM
-3

No. It's murder. Fortunately you can still legally do that in at least 30 US states.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 04:24 PM
2

haha
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 04:23 PM
4

No, they will not carry their babies to term any more often than they did before. Women who want abortions will still get them. If they live in states that ban abortion, they'll travel to states where abortion is legal. This isn't hard, people. Dobbs changes nothing.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 04:22 PM
0

Like this is ever going to happen... People who want abortions can still get them. If abortion was so great, why weren't baby mamas aborting their "unwanted" babies (which they can still do, by the way)?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 04:21 PM
0

They have no power. They let an election be stolen from them in plain sight and they stood by and let it happen.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 04:19 PM
0

We know, but we lost our constitutional right to abortions. Now its up to the states. As it should be. Go to states that have abortion policies you like. Problem solved. So those of means can get abortions, but those are who poor, and the most likely to need welfare programs after the child is born, are SOL. Bullshit. those who love feticide will pay for it. All kinds of "charities" will spring up to help them travel. Insurers will pay for them. There are women who lack the means to travel and t…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 04:18 PM
2

in other words... how life is now. See? Nothing's changed. Everything's still the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 04:12 PM
1

Social religious conservatives have no political power. Half of them are doing the shit you're saying they're against.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 04:11 PM
5

Nobody is fucking with anyone's lives. Because guess what - you can still go get all the abortions you want in states that allow them. If you want abortions so badly, move to a state that allows them.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 04:10 PM
-7

I am 100% correct - because everything I said up there is correct, legally and practically.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 04:09 PM
1

Chicken little bullshit No one cares about gay marriage or interracial dating/sex/marriage
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 04:08 PM
13

There is no abortion ban. You can still go to blue states and get abortions. You can still travel and get abortions. No one is going to make you stay in your red state and not get an abortion. No one is taking away your birth control . You can still fuck whoever you want. Or not. You can still marry whoever you want. Or not. All that's been said today is that the US constitution does not contain a right to abortion and the states can regulate them. Most states will have some form of abortion. A …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 04:06 PM
2

This right here.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 03:58 PM
1

OK... I live in the US which is still a first world country as of today... If you don't live in the US, what do you even care about Roe or Dobbs? What's it to you?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 03:57 PM
1

Meh. Don't care. I'm not mad. States' rights won a big victory today. It won't stop the coming fractures, but at least it's constitutionally sound. You're just mad you now might have to travel a wee bit and spend some cash to murder a baby. Too bad so sad.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 03:55 PM
0

Horseshit. Rich republicans don't give a fuck - 10% of them are gay themselves. Or they date or fuck or marry outside their races Stop the Chicken little bullshit
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 03:53 PM
-1

No. They'll go get their abortions. They'll go to states that allow it. They'll scrape the cash together and go do it. Or... THEY COULD JUST FUCKING USE A RUBBER CORRECTLY
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 03:51 PM
0

That doesn't matter to the issue at hand. This decision will in no way increase poor baby mamas on welfare. If anything we have MORE poor baby mamas on welfare and there's been a right to murder your babies for the last 50 years. It has NOT been a right to murder your babies for about, oh, 2 hours now...
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 03:49 PM
1

No, they don't. All that the long gun reg says is you can't bring that long gun back to the state where you reside. You can buy it in the visiting state; you just can't take it home. Yeah, not reading a 9 page PDF of proposed legislation. Tell me the page numbers and quote the language you're talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 03:48 PM
1

Hate what? gay marriage? No. Bullshit. People. Do. Not. Care.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 03:45 PM
1

How bad do you want your abortion? How much are you willing to pay to "get rid of that 'parasite'"?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 03:44 PM
1

ok
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 03:42 PM
0

Bullshit. No one cares about any of this stuff.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 03:41 PM
4

No they won't. Dobbs changes nothing. Women will still be able to get abortions. Just travel to a state that allows them, if you really want one. Or move there.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 03:40 PM
5

Well said I cannot beleive the utter stupidity here... PEOPLE THERE IS NO BAN ON ABORTION NO ONE BANNED ANYTHING YOU CAN STILL GO TO BLUE STATES AND GET ABORTIONS NO ONE IS STOPPING YOU FROM GETTING ABORTIONS GET ALL THE ABORTIONS YOU WANT IN STATES THAT ALLOW IT
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 03:38 PM
1

Meh
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 03:37 PM
1

MO cannot do that - a state's legislative power does not extend beyond its borders. This is ridiculous - source that claim.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 03:36 PM
1

I DK, but to me this is a federalism/states rights issue. I don't care about saving babies or murdering babies as much as I care about whether the people have a right to decide for their own states and localities what their policies and laws should be.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 03:34 PM
1

No. No one gives a fuck about those issues. No one gets fired up about gays fucking each other in the ass or about blacks marrying whites. They're not even issues.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 03:32 PM
1

So a bunch of people screamed about Pence. So what? Like liberals weren't already demanding that and threatening his and Trump's lives anyway from 2017-2021. So it's OK when you threaten federal officials' lives; but somehow if an alleged conservative does, that's NOT ok?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 03:31 PM
1

Then you as a woman can move to a nontrigger state or if you get knocked up, go to a nontrigger state to get your abortion and then return. Take it up with your state legislatures and get the trigger laws repealed.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 03:30 PM
1

SCOTUS did not ban abortion. SCOTUS held the constitution does not grant individuals a constitutional right to abortion and that states can regulate abortion. Some states will ban abortion. Others will regulate it. Or not. If you don't understand the difference, I can't help you.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 03:29 PM
1

We can't take care of every case. Hard cases make bad law. All it says is you don't have a constitutional right to an abortion. Shit happens. I've dealt with unfair shit my entire life. So do other people. Oh well.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 03:26 PM
1

I also saw news reports that most of the people involved in the "insurrection" were FBI/CIA plants and hired guns. Try to gaslight someone else. I don't believe your bullshit. It's all a kangaroo court show trial now, reminiscent of the USSR. We live in a new totalitarian state governed by a doddering fool, just like the USSR - Brezhnev, Andropov, Chernenko.... and YOU BELIEVE THEIR BULLSHIT.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 03:25 PM
1

and they will still be able to exercise their choices. They might just have to travel a ways to do that. Or they can move to states with like minded people where their "choices" will be "legal".
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 03:23 PM
1

Stop believing the bullshit your government tells you. It makes you look stupid.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 03:23 PM
3

No one gives a shit about contraception or gay marriage
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 03:22 PM
1

Put that koolaid down
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 03:22 PM
1

No one cares about interracial marriage or gay marriage. There aren't enough opponents to those issues, no one cares
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 03:21 PM
2

Well, buy a dog and be alone then
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 03:19 PM
1

There was no invasion of the US capital HAHAHAHA Don't worry you'll still be able to get abortions. Dobbs changes nothing. If Griswold is overturned, it changes nothing
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 03:19 PM
1

Please. Bullshit. Show me a case where Griswold is up for reconsideration. Loving and Obergefell are going to be settled law - can't touch those at all. The battle on interracial marriage and gay marriages has been fought and decided. No one gives a fuck about marriage anymore anyway
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 03:18 PM
3

Sure. of course. Red states will ban abortion. Blue states will allow murdering week old babies. Everyone's happy.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 03:16 PM
2

Yes. Some states will ban abortions. Others will practically let you murder week old babies. Everyone will be happy.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 03:16 PM
1

Then you deal with it if it happens. It won't. It's right to privacy and the court didn't really touch that in Dobbs. Stop Chicken Littling all over the place. Not going to happen.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 03:15 PM
2

thanks.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 03:14 PM
2

Exactly. Red states will outlaw or regulate abortion. Blue states will practically let you murder a week old baby. Everyone will be happy.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 03:13 PM
1

No.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 03:13 PM
1

Yes. So everyone needs to take a deep breath and count to 10 because in practicality, Dobbs changes nothing.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 03:12 PM
1

They can't. Dobbs says nothing about this.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 03:12 PM
5

The jury found the facts. He proved it. The jury decides what the facts are.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 03:10 PM
1

No. Cannot happen. SCOTUS would have to overrule its right of privacy cases in Griswold and Eisenstadt for that to happen. SCOTUS did not touch those cases.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 03:10 PM
2

you can't even get the cases right Griswold v CT was right of privacy for maried women Eisenstadt v. Baird was right of privacy for unmarried women SCOTUS Would have to overrule both cases before the states can regulate who can get BC like that. Goddamn it, PLEASE stop trying to play amateur lawyer
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 03:09 PM
4

Jesus Christ. SCOTUS DID NOT "BAN" ABORTIONS. THERE IS NO FUCKING "BAN" ON ABORTION NOW. All Dobbs says is there is no federal constitutional right to an abortion, and that the states may regulate it as they see fit. THAT'S ALL IT FUCKING SAYS.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 03:06 PM
2

If CA wants to murder babies, OK. If TX wants to outlaw murdering babies, OK.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 03:05 PM
1

True. Dobbs changes nothing - baby murder will still happen. All that's been said is the states get to decide.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 03:04 PM
1

Whatever. Men aren't the superficial ones here. One "nonsuperficial" alleged woman here doesn't a trend make.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 03:03 PM
2

It won't change all that much because at least 30 states will allow baby murder in one form or another.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 03:03 PM
1

Don't worry - you'll still be able to get BC. SCOTUS cannot ban BC.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 03:02 PM
1

SCOTUS did not "ban" anything. Dobbs did not ban abortion. All Dobbs did was say you don't have a constitutional right to obtain abortions. SCOTUS cannot "ban" birth control. All that's been said is that you don't have a constitutional right to an abortion. You don't have a constitutional right to birth control either. SCOTUS might overrule Griswold and Eisenstadt which talked about BC but saying you do not have a constitutional right to BC is not the same thing as a "ban" on BC
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 03:01 PM
1

Incorrect. I need to be able to at least talk to you and you need to be able to cook me a decent meal, and you need to pay your own fucking way.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 02:58 PM
1

Money and looks is all 90% of what you care about. Not intelligence, or kindness, or caring - does he make you tingle and will he pay for it and does he fuck you good from behind and you're good.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 02:55 PM
1

Nuh uh!
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 02:52 PM
2

Really? Women are going to choose where to live based on where it's legal to murder babies? That really speaks well of women's character, doesn't it?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 02:52 PM
2

My man!
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 02:50 PM
1

Not at all. Women can still get abortions - they just might have to travel a bit.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 02:50 PM
1

Yeah... but you can go to states that permit abortion. Don't worry - you can still get your abortions. They'll still be cheap, safe, and legal in most places.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 02:49 PM
0

BReaking SCOTUS overturns Roe v Wade. Don't worry, ladies - you can still murder your babies in at least 30 US states.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 02:33 PM
1

This seems to be how it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 02:21 PM
1

They seem to enjoy their Chaddictions. Sometimes. Or, at least they prefer their Chaddictions. No women can get good men they're attracted to. They have to choose - good, or sexually attractive. either/or.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 02:18 PM
1

Guys do all that already. All I'm saying is if a girl likes a guy she can go up to him and take just a little bit of initiative. That's all. What's so terrible about that?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 02:16 PM
1

LOL
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 02:14 PM
1

Yeah, except it never works well that way. He wants her but she doesn't want him, she divorce rapes him and ruins everyone's lives. I suppose half of a decimated 401(k) and some child support money makes it worth it....
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 02:13 PM
1

She's not attracted to any of them
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 02:11 PM
0

Most women can't have good men they're attracted to. They can have "good men", or they can have men they're attracted to. Most pick men they're sexually attracted to for sex, until they decide to "settle down", and then pick "good men"; or just hang back and let "good men" pick them. It's not a trope. Don't blame me, it ain't my fault. This is just how it is - it's the complaint every woman makes.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 02:07 PM
2

Men approach her all the time. It's that she's not sexually attracted to any of them, so in her mind, they "don't count". Every woman alive has 5 men in her DMs and 20 men left on unread in every social media app she has. They "don't count" because she doens't want to fuck them.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 02:05 PM
1

I didn't say that
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 02:02 PM
1

I suppose; but they're not happy with that either... maybe they could try to make something happen themselves instead of standing there passively bitching and complaining.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 01:59 PM
0

Oh well... women gotta learn to live with some rejection too, especially today in the SMP/RMP they fucked up.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 01:58 PM
0

Women need to get over their fear of rejection and ask men out. If you're interested in that guy, go over to him, strike up a conversation, and ask him for his number. Then call him to set up a date. "Good men" are all around you. (Oh yeah, you're not attracted to any of them so y ou don't see them... my bad....) Never mind. Carry on with the complaint fest....
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 01:52 PM
1

And there's the big reveal. But she says he totes has a dad bod and loves his mommy.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 01:48 PM
1

Men aren't the ones being superficial.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 01:48 PM
5

That's not how it works, at all. Most men aren't even trying for 7+; they're in 5 and 6 range and can't get them to pay attention to them
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 01:47 PM
3

what if people don't care if you're impressed?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 01:44 PM
3

women need to be more confident in approaching men they're interested in. Especially since they're complaining about there being "no good men". Shit - find a good man and approach him. They need to get over their fear of rejection.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 01:43 PM
1

link doesn't work...
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 01:41 PM
1

Yes, pleasing to the eye. To me it means sexual desire. A woman is sexually attracted to men she desires to have sex with. If she doesn't desire sex with him, she's not attracted to him.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 01:38 PM
1

meh. Sexual attraction is really all that matters. I mean, you gave us a dictionary definition that doesn't really work in practice and isn't helpful to men understanding what makes them attractive to women.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 01:35 PM
1

finances and financial security are never attractive. Women want those things in men; but they are not sexually attractive. The only kind of "attractive" that matters is sexual; is her raw sexual desire. Finances are not attractive. A man's monetary success is not attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 01:33 PM
10

Heard lied. Depp proved it. Now Heard has to pay. Justice was done. Or will be done, as soon as she pays. Simple as that.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 01:22 PM
6

My view is that Amber Heard is a walking talking textbook example of Cluster B personality disorders and gaslighted the ever loving fuck out of the entire country. A jury saw through it. Net verdict in Depp's favor, around $4 million, nondischargeable in bankruptcy, so that judgment will follow her around until every red cent of it is paid, with interest. Heard got what was coming to her. I hope Depp doesn't settle with her, and hounds her until she pays the entire judgment.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 01:18 PM
1

This is just all kinds of wrong. If you want women to want you: be a doctor. Shit. Be anything that makes a shit ton of money. No. She will not want you. She'll want your money. Money translates to competence. No. Exactly backwards. Competence translates to money. But, if you meant that if you have money you'll appear competent to some women, maybe. If you are highly competent, you will be respected. A woman cannot love you unless she respects you. Of course, even if you are rich you can still l…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 01:16 PM
0

I have lots of female friends and acquaintances. Like I said - most of them do just fine and some did fantastic.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 01:04 PM
1

So I'm supposed to... believe what they say? LOL no.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 01:04 PM
1

Please. Excellent medical care has virtually eradicated childbirth risk. The worst thing that happens to most women is they can't lose the last 5 pounds of "baby weight". I said VIRTUALLY risk free. VIRTUALLY. Please read carefully. if a man wants me to have his children I need a house to my name, a car, and to be a SAHM (at least for their first 10 years). And do you actually have that? (NO) You and women like you are the reason why you don't. It's always about what you can extract from men, al…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 01:01 PM
1

I still don't care
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 11:55 PM
1

risks around pregnancy are virtually nil. physical cost of pregnancy - if a woman doesn't want to bear those costs, there's birth control and abortion. No woman has a child today who does not want to have that child. So if she bears costs of pregnancy and childbirth, those are costs, not risks, and she bears them fully by choice. The financial costs are or can be almost fully borne by government or by men. If a woman cannot afford it, government will pay, or men will be made to pay. I was talkin…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 11:41 PM
2

I 100% believe it. Because it's 100% true. What risks do women have to deal with that have NOT been neutralized or eliminated or shifted? --STDs? Can be cured or managed to asymptomatic. --pregnancy? birth control and abortion. --childbirth? Medical care never better, virtually risk free, and cost free. If she or the government don't pay, a man or men will. --being around men? If any man so much as makes her feel kind of weird, all she has to do is say so, and immediately, white knights will com…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 11:16 PM
1

They do just fine, and some do fantastic.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 11:05 PM
5

I'm not seeing the same things you're seeing. You're saying average women get shit. I don't agree with that at all - I see average women doing great in terms of what they get from men. They get good looking men, good treatment from men, commitment, relationships, investment, marriage. So, no, I don't agree with any claim that average women aren't getting what they want from their dealings with men. That's bullshit
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 09:44 PM
4

well, my eyes tell me quite differently
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 09:33 PM
1

the link was to r/tinder
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 09:05 PM
2

if you can even get women to message....
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 08:56 PM
6

No, it's because they can get more and better, because they're women.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 08:45 PM
3

Run. Get out while you still can
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 08:44 PM
8

No, you're wrong. There's a definite difference between how average women do and how average men do. Average women do much, much better than average men do. Average women can very easily depend on average looks to get above average men. That's the norm.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 08:32 PM
2

OK.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 08:29 PM
9

average women can. Average women do just fine, and some do fantastic. Average men can't. The absolute best an average man can do is "ok", and most do far, far worse.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 08:23 PM
0

Kind of like pursuing men just for their good looks results in getting used; and choosing beta bux men because they can't get the men they really want, results in destroyed lives. And that's not men's fault. Response to your ninja edit: Again - none of that is men's fault. Men didn't cause or create any of this.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 08:22 PM
0

And how Billy Beta ends up with Sally Slut. And why there's an r/deadbedrooms and r/theredpill. And why there are pills in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 08:19 PM
2

Go back and read the comment, and you'll understand why.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 08:11 PM
1

bodies. Good looks. Sexual attractiveness. Why do you pursue women? Fun. Sex. the nicer ones of you provide "soft landings" for us from the rough and tumble of life. The rest of you are enjoyable but expendable distractions for which we'll trade varying items of value and worth, temporarily.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 07:59 PM
7

If you want to make an omelet, you're going to have to break some eggs.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 07:42 PM
1

It's disingenuous because they don't see you as a friend but feel they have to lie to you to avoid the awkward rejection talk. But on the other hand, if you're a guy and you reject a woman, it's like you did the second worst thing in the world to her. I've actually heard women call it "emotional rape".
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 07:40 PM
2

No. All they can do is refer the matter out for criminal charges to DOJ and then it would have to do something. I suspect they could subpoena Trump to testify, but he can throw up all kinds of roadblocks to that. Plus, J6 committee won't want to give Trump another platform for him to speak because he'd absolutely slice and dice them all on live TV.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 07:39 PM
7

If you're an unattractive guy, your only hope is to interact with a girl long enough that she stops being "consciously" aware of how unattractive you are and her attention shifts to your personality. Well, she will remain consciously aware of your unattractiveness. Her attention will shift not only to your personality but also to the other things you bring, namely, resources. Mostly that's money and commitment. So, beta bux. His best shot is leading with beta bux provider game. But that does not…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 07:35 PM
2

heh
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 07:29 PM
2

that's because sex isn't high risk for women anymore. It used to be, but it isn't anymore.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 07:04 PM
-2

Women used to have to deal with a lot more. They don't anymore. All the sexual risks women used to bear have been totally neutralized or the risks shifted to men.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 07:03 PM
0

But sex isn't high risk now for women. It used to be. It's just that the evolved behaviors haven't adapted to the new reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 07:03 PM
3

a woman who gets a free drink or a meal on a date is a whore? A woman who gets to cut to the front of the line is a whore? Women sure do love being whores, then....
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 06:57 PM
2

everything's gotta be personal, huh?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 06:55 PM
3

people with higher SMVs can more easily get into and have relationships, though. Higher SMV people get the halo effect which allows them to get away with things that lower SMV people can't.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 06:48 PM
1

Yes, but we're talking here about women, not men.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 06:47 PM
1

Pink pill women
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 06:45 PM
6

Not true at all. Pretty privilege extends to all of life. They get free stuff. People just give pretty women free shit. They get free drinks, meals, entertainment, all expense paid weekends. They get to jump lines everywhere. They get preferences in education and employment. People think pretty women are more intelligent and more "moral" than they really are. People give pretty women the benefit of the doubt. (Halo effect) There's more to it than just "hot girls can have sex".
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 06:44 PM
4

I LOL'd. I swear to God - women, either you're strong and independent, or you're not. Pick one.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 06:42 PM
5

Well, that's not all, though. higher SMV gives you options, especially when you're a higher SMV man. Options extends to everything, not just sex. It goes into the kinds and types of relationships you can have too.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 06:40 PM
1

I'm not here to convince you.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 06:35 PM
3

He likes her. Scarcity mentality. Blue pill beta simp. This is the kind of woman who makes rules for beta simps like Shawn but breaks them for the alpha types she used to fuck and if another of those alpha types shows up, she'll fuck him. Shawn thinks if he's nice enough or waits long enough, she'll fuck him.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 06:35 PM
1

I don't really care. You're just wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 06:32 PM
1

Whatever.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 06:31 PM
1

Wrong. You're just wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 06:29 PM
3

You're still wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 06:29 PM
3

Okay. That doesn't make you correct.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 06:27 PM
1

uh huh.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 06:25 PM
3

No. Women do this, and say they do it.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 06:24 PM
4

Oh well. We all have to do things in this life that don't make us "comfy". Or, we can break up. Try this on for size: "I would feel really gross pressuring a person to buy me dinner to prove they're "serious" when they say they aren't comfy."
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 06:23 PM
7

But it has to translate into concrete competence. And they're not "attracted" to it. They figure out that it translates into something they can use, like money. That doesn't mean "attraction". It means they want to use and exploit it.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 06:22 PM
3

Take it up with women; not me. I'm just repeating what women say about this issue and what they clearly demonstrate.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 06:21 PM
2

I am saying that in this situation, Sarah is lying. If Sarah was into Shawn, she would fuck him.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 06:18 PM
6

according to women, unattractive men are by definition creepy. According to those same women, attractive men are by definition not creepy.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 06:17 PM
3

This has nothing to do with virgins. Or maybe it was because of you personally, not your virginity. This has nothing to do with how desirable a virgin is or how desirable Sarah is. This has to do with how to handle it when Sarah fucked all kinds of guys but won't fuck you and tells you to wait for marriage.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 06:16 PM
5

Did you even read the OP? he decides to become exclusive with her. One night, while talking on the couch with Sarah, Shawn tries to become intimate with her, but she refuses his advances. She says she is really into Shawn, but she is waiting until marriage to have sex She refuses his advances, then lies that she's into him. Claims is waiting till marriage. Then we read later that Sarah confesses her past sexual history. So she isn't really interested in him. She has him pegged as a beta bux for …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 06:11 PM
0

OK, well, there's nothing I can tell you to convince you, so you go have a good day.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 06:09 PM
3

Women lie because it's about attractive and unattractive, not about "creepy". Unattractive = creepy. Attractive = not creepy.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 06:07 PM
1

All well and good. Maybe he shouldn't have spent resources on her. THAT IS NOT THE POINT. The point is whether he's getting what he wants or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 06:06 PM
2

No one's saying it's his fault or even Sarah's fault. The question is only what he should do, not whose "fault" it is. It's no one's "fault". The only question is whether Shawn is getting what he wants and needs. If he is, he stays; if he isn't, he ends it. Simple as that. Doesn't matter what you or anyone else thinks of him - all that matters is whether he's getting what he wants and what he's supposed to do about it if he's not.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 06:03 PM
2

he got played because she feigned interest in him them sprung on him "oh, i'm not going to have sex until I got married, but just so you know, I got trains run on me and all kinds of sexual fun before. So, yeah, hope you're cool with that, sweetie"
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 06:01 PM
1

No. We're talking here about a woman who's had a string of nonmarital sexual encounters, then changes, and decides she's not going to fuck again until marriage. That's common. I've seen this. So have thousands of other men. So have two other men on this very comment thread. This is totally believable. The main reasons women do this are (1) because they've changed their strategy to lock down a beta bux simp, and (2) because they don't want to get pumped and dumped again.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 05:59 PM
2

Yes. It would. Go back and read my comment for reason why such men do. It has nothing to do with fault. It's not about blame. It's just why men do this.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 05:56 PM
4

Sarah DOES happen. You're just plain wrong about this.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 05:55 PM
2

Exactly. And I'm telling you Sarah happens.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 05:53 PM
1

Some men will. Who said anything about fault? I am saying it happens. You seem to be saying this never happens. If that's your claim, it's wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 05:51 PM
1

They lie about this.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 05:50 PM
1

It doesn't matter if it has or hasn't happened to me personally. I don't want to "promote" this as anything. I am telling you that women like this are common. I am also telling you that you are wrong in your claim that this never, ever, ever, EVER happens, EVER. You are saying this has never ever in the history of the world happened. I am telling you you are wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 05:49 PM
6

because women lie. Or they change their representations to you. Or they get you committed to the point that you can't back out without losing enormous sunk resources. Because the men who date them have scarcity mentalities and women know it. Or they decide this after they've dated you awhile. Or they decide you're a beta bux they want commitment from. See, if you understood this as a man you wouldn't have to ask this. You don't know what you're talking about. You literally do. not. know. what yo…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 05:47 PM
2

No you haven't dated women as a man does. You're not a man, and you haven't done so in a nonpoly situation. You knowing a ton of women doesn't mean anything if you haven't had sex with them or dated them or been married to them.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 05:45 PM
-1

THe point: Creepy men are a thing. Just not as big a thing as you think. and It's not "creepy" you're complaining about. It's "unattractive". You just don't want "unattractive" men paying attention to you. And that's fine. Just be honest about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 05:27 PM
2

Or... you could just say "no thanks" or "I'm not interested". See how easy that is?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 05:26 PM
1

All women are like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 05:25 PM
1

All it has to be is generally true. It doesn't have to account for exceptions and outliers. There are no snowflakes and even if there are, you can discount them or adapt.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 05:20 PM
0

Sounds like it to me. Women are having less sex, and stopping sex after a string of nonmarital encounters is consistent with less sex and with a change in strategy as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 05:12 PM
2

You can't even get my argument right. I'm not going to respond further.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 05:08 PM
0

You have no evidence. I need not "argue" with one who has no "evidence". Stop downvoting. It's against the rules.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 05:08 PM
2

Yeah. Good answer. He got played, take the L, chalk it up.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 05:05 PM
1

So wrong. You're not a man, you've not seen this, you've not experienced it. You don't know what you're talking about AT ALL. That's not an insult. You literally don't know what you're talking about because you have no experience with it and you've not dated women as a man does.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 05:04 PM
2

I believe you but you're not a "Sarah".
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 05:02 PM
1

She's an extreme outlier
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 05:01 PM
2

No, it's because you're just broken recording it relying on a "study" (LOL) that doesn't say what you claim it says and doesn't support your claims.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 04:57 PM
1

Yeah. You c'mon. I mean isn't this consistent with the claims that everyone under 30 is having less sex than GenX did at the same stage of life?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 04:55 PM
1

I don't need a "study" (LOL) Bye
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 04:50 PM
6

You don't know what you're talking about, like, at all Have a nice day
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 04:49 PM
1

You dont' know what you're talking about Bye
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 04:48 PM
7

I know you're poly. That's why I asked you specifically what I asked you. If you think that any woman is going to tell you anything about her sex life and withholding sex, you're crazy. You don't know anything about this from a man's perspective because you aren't one. Shit, you've never even had a one on one experience with another woman in a nonpoly situation. That's fine, but don't come in here telling us what women are like in relationships with men when you don't even know what you're talki…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 04:46 PM
6

It doesn't. The study doesnt' specifically discuss attractiveness at all. You can't say shit here. You still haven't said anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 04:45 PM
1

No. the burden is with you, who advanced the "study"(LOL). How many times do I have to say this: The study doesn't say what you claim it says. I've carried my burden because it remains unrebutted. You have presented no evidence to rebut it. The "evidence" you claim rebuts it does not say what you claim it says.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 04:44 PM
3

Me personally? Three. TRP? Hundreds of thousands. Men? Millions. It happens when the woman isn't really all that sexually attracted to the man she is dating and wants commitment from. How many women have you had sex with in a nonpolyamorous situation? How many women have you dated seriously in a nonpoly situation? How many women have you been married to?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 04:41 PM
1

OK but it's not the same thing as you were talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 04:39 PM
2

THere is no bias. Your "data" LOL is not a source either especially since it doesn't say what you claim it says.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 04:38 PM
1

You don't have any data either. The "studies" (LOL) you rely on don't say what you claim they say. Claims advanced with no supporting data need not be responded to with contrary data.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 04:38 PM
0

You couldn't be more wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 04:37 PM
5

No. Sarah is a very common type woman. Many men have met many Sarahs in their lifetimes. Are you saying there is no such woman as Sarah?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 04:27 PM
1

None of the above. Break up with her because Shawn's not getting what he wants and needs from Sarah. Sarah does not meet his relationship wants and needs. Sarah is not really sexually attracted to him. Sarah has Shawn pegged as a beta bux she will use.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 04:21 PM
6

We study dating behavior using data from a Speed Dating experiment where we generate random matching of subjects and create random variation in the number of potential partners. Our design allows us to directly observe individual decisions rather than just final matches. Women put greater weight on the intelligence and the race of partner, You really need to learn to differentiate your personal opinions from what the studies (LOL) you "rely" on actually say. This study (LOL) does NOT say that "w…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 04:14 PM
5

again - it did not specifically exclude attractiveness. This has nothing to do with anyone's bias. The study doesn't say what you claim it says.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 04:09 PM
1

no. Sexual DESIRE is a huge part of our thoughts and emotions. Which is not at all the same as "sex is a huge part of men's lives". If sex were a huge part of our lives, we would fuck all the time. Most men cannot do that because most men can't find even one woman willing to fuck them.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 04:08 PM
15

Male competence, social aptitude. Not booksmarts. Not raw brain power.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 04:05 PM
6

Meh. Don't get personal. Your "study" (LOL) doesn't exclude attractiveness. I've watched women put up with sexist chauvinist behavior from attractive men all the time.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 04:01 PM
1

No, only sometimes. It doesn't happen as much as you think it does. When you're a man and you can actually speak to this, let me know.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 03:59 PM
1

Which in no way negates anything I said.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 03:51 PM
3

No, only unattractive men do that. Whatever attractive men do is by definition not creepy and not sexist. Attractive men can get away with a lot more. So if they're attractive, it's not creepy or sexist. Even if it is "sexist", women still enjoy it. Women love sexism and male chauvinism from attractive men. By the way, the downvoting - this is what women say. Women are the ones who point out that attractive men get away with more. Women are the ones who demonstrate this.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 03:47 PM
1

OK but that doesn't mean we need to base our decisions on the exceptions or what they do. Nor does it mean we need to think that what "exceptions" do is "normal".
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 03:44 PM
1

Those are exceptions to the rule. What is it with women who focus on all the exceptions?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 03:40 PM
0

Try this: "If you don't stop contacting me, I will sue you into oblivion and bring criminal charges." You're a woman. The entire world exists to protect you and will do whatever you want. All you have to do is peep "I feel unsafe".
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 03:37 PM
1

Men generally have reason and accountability. Women don't. That should be clear enough.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 03:35 PM
1

Well it does work most of the time. If it didn't work with him, file a lawsuit, get a protective order, sue him for damages, swear out complaints with the local PD, get a CC permit. This sub is full of exceptions.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 03:34 PM
3

Creepy men are a thing. Just not as big a thing as you think. And it's not a fucking federal case every time some weird guy looks at you for 3 seconds instead of 2. Are you "strong and independent", or not? Make a decision. It's not "creepy" you're complaining about. It's "unattractive". You just don't want "unattractive" men paying attention to you. And that's fine. Just be honest about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 03:32 PM
1

OK. But we're talking about women here, not men. "Men do it too, sometimes, on one particular aspect of life" does not mean that women don't do 'it'.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 03:28 PM
1

Your inability to explain your points is your problem, not mine, Marcia Marcia Marcia.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 03:23 PM
3

let me help you with that. If you're attractive (as most of you are), then you initiating is attractive and NOT offputting. There. Happy now? Got it? Women approaching and initiating is not about whether we think it's hot or not. It's about women's fear of rejection. You don't care how we feel about it. You care about how you feel about it. You just don't want to risk anything. You just don't want to risk rejection. It doesn't matter if anyone has a "hive mind". It doesn't matter if a minority h…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 03:19 PM
1

I can't be defensive about something that makes no logical sense. I don't even know what point you were trying to make.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 03:15 PM
3

Not really. The men who tend to get called creepy or sexist for using their fundamental advantages are --unattractive men --men who talk about intersexual dynamics --men who talk about using their fundamental advantages as men to gain advantages in life or otherwise enjoy "privileges" that others allegedly don't
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 03:15 PM
1

maybe they'll need to bring their covfefe as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 03:12 PM
1

Nonsense nonsequitur gibberish
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 03:09 PM
0

No, I'm just a believer that most of the time, art imitates life. Which is what that movie line was. What we see on screens many times reflects real life. It doesn't have to be a perfect reflection. It need only be generally true. And it is. If you cannot accept that, that's on you.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 03:08 PM
0

That would be nice, woudln't it. What would be even nicer is if women would adapt their communication styles just a little bit to be slightly more direct. Here's what doesn't work to address "persistence in the face of rejection": --ignoring --ghosting --text blocking --saying shit like "I just need some time" or "I don't know, I'm still working this stuff out" --continuing to sit there after you've already politely told Mr. DrunkOffHisAss that no, you're not fucking Here's what DOES work: --say…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 03:05 PM
1

That's your experience.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 02:59 PM
1

Ok, if you want to believe all that.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 02:59 PM
1

Wow, that's... not what I said. This started as a response to Passepar talking about women being fickle about who they sleep with. Nowhere did I say men are perfect. Nor did I say women fucking suck (they'd do lots better if they did suck more though).
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 02:56 PM
1

It's not highly subjective. It's generally true. Yes, I can claim it's generally true, because in most men's experiences as well as most women's, it is true. THe fact that it's not true in YOUR experience doesn't mean it's not generally true. ALL women claim the right to change their minds. Come on.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 02:53 PM
1

If they're exaggerations, then they're just inflated truths that everyone knows are inflated exaggerations. Again that's why they're funny. Something need not be true 100% of the time to be generally true. All something has to be is generally true for it to have value as a proposition.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 02:52 PM
1

It wouldn't be funny or have staying power if it were false. People (both men and women) wouldn't repeat it if it were false. It wouldn't have become a tag line if it were false. No one would ever remember it if it were false.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 02:41 PM
1

It's kind of a joke. It's a movie line. It's intended to be funny and provocative - and it's funny because in general everyone knows it's true. Women always claim it's their prerogative to change their minds, anytime, anyplace, for any reason, without notice. This movie line is a reflection of that. In general, yes, men are more logical and reasonable, and therefore more subject to accountability, than women are. It doesn't matter that there are some flaky ass men out there and some super respon…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 02:38 PM
2

Also - if a woman ends things with you or is pulling back or the relationship is not going well, don't think you'll get a straight answer if you ask her. The medium is the message - she's not getting together, she's not talking to you, she's pulling back - that IS the message. She's no longer interested or she was never really interested in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 02:35 PM
1

The Wisdom of Melvin Udall (paraphrased) if you want to understand women, think of a man, then take away reason and accountability.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 02:32 PM
0

Yes they do. They point out the men are shit. They blame her for picking shitty men. That's focusing on the quality of men they pick. Anyone with two brain cells can see they're picking shitty men, and this sub says so, all the time. They're just agreeing with the women who are complaining about the shitty men they pick. Again: Woman is the sexual selector. She picks who gets laid. If she picks shitty men to lay down with, that's on her.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 02:28 PM
2

Nah. Most of them are straight
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 02:26 PM
2

No. It's not mostly nonstraight women. It's mostly white liberal "educated" women in relationships of 5 years duration or less with a smattering of middle aged married women with kids.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 02:14 PM
5

That's not pedestalizing shitty men. That's just acknowledging that both the men and the women in those situations are shit... But since the woman has the power to pick who her baby daddy will be, it's on her to pick the best one she can. If she fucks that up, there's nothing wrong with calling her out for fucking that up.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 02:02 PM
1

Agree. Can we start with the meaning of the word "attractive"?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 01:58 PM
1

1) Women lie about everything, especially their Ns. 2) There is way, WAY more relationship cheating going on with both sexes than is being reported. 3) Dick size matters way, WAY more than women will admit. 4) Most women aren't really sexually attracted to the men they married. 5) Most women are more sexually attracted to the men they used to have sex with than to the men they married.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 01:57 PM
8

A point for discussing issues, without discussing issues.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 01:49 PM
4

That's not it. see my reply above. Women are hardwired to seek out the best genetic material to make babies and the strongest men who can protect them and their offspring. It's evolved over tens of thousands of years. It has nothing to do with avoiding pregnancy, it has everything to do with getting pregnant and getting as many babies to term and alive as possible ​ Just because women want to avoid pregnancy now most of the time doesn't mean the behaviors that can lead to pregnancy will be any d…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 01:37 PM
3

Yes - it's because they want to get the best genes to make the best babies and the best man to keep the babies from getting killed
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 01:35 PM
1

Yes, if they settle a lot. I was disagreeing wth the OP. I think if women settle a "little" or "slightly", they'll probably be OK.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 01:31 PM
3

All these things about male "advantages" are true. Especially the first one, about how we don't really worry about our physical safety and security. But that does not mean men are underestimating those advantages, nor does this mean women do not have more advantages. Because, well, women have far, far more fundamental advantages to living in society than men do. Far more. By orders of magnitude more. I'd rather be a man, but only because I don't really know anything else, not because I have "mor…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/22 10:00 PM
2

I don't think women will simp very much. Not as much as they used to.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/22 09:51 PM
2

Having been a father of an 18 year old girl, I can't say I think it's morally wrong. I would have all other kinds of adjectives for it, like "not a good idea" and "kind of weird" and "borderline inappropriate" and "this ain't ever gonna work". But there's nothing morally wrong with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/22 09:38 PM
3

why is it morally wrong?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/22 09:36 PM
2

Sure it's OK. But women will say it isn't OK because "grooming" or "power imbalance" or something. The bottom line is, it's OK, morally and otherwise, because it's OK for an 18 year old woman to do all the things adults do. There's no real difference between an 18 year old woman having sex with a 19 year old man and that same woman having sex with a 39 year old man.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/22 09:34 PM
1

in this example, is it safe to say that Jenny was more attracted to Mark than Dylan? Yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/22 09:26 PM
2

No, he does that only if he's not getting sex. A man will never, ever settle below his attraction floor.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/22 08:53 PM
1

Yeah, men settle too, but they're usually OK with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/22 08:52 PM
1

Disagree. Women will settle a lot if they're running out of time to get married. In most cases, they're miserable for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/22 08:52 PM
1

Yeah, I think it changes depending on how sexually attracted she is. I think a woman who is attracted will need less maintenance than a woman who isn't. If you're not as attractive, you need to bring more "other things" besides sexual attractiveness to keep her.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/22 08:46 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter