TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

WordGame Archive

View 0 posts and 32 comments by WordGame on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

Yeah, you’re right, it’s probably ‘all women’. It’s probably half the human population that has a problem, and not you, an individual who fears being emotionally or financially hurt by a woman so much that you avoid them. Occam’s razor.
/r/MGTOW12/09/19 09:34 PM
3

Nice broski. Now, can I convince you to save and invest 20-30% of that youthful and growing income? Save and invest, my man. Pay your future self first. Also, use the time in the military, and it’s educational programs offers to active duty, to knock out a higher education degree while in the military. It’s the most cost efficient way to get loads of expensive education, that a GI bill simply wont cover once you get out.
/r/MGTOW12/09/19 12:27 AM
-2

Everyone is a victim of something, provided they have lived a life or are currently living. The problem with a lot of people, or women in our particular examination, is that they place an inordinate amount of value on victimhood, in creating a narrative of who they are. This is not just women though - look at this place! MGTOW is half-full of men who have not been burned by lop-sided divorce courts. It’s filled with men who have an axe to grind with women because, for some reason, they had a bad…
/r/MGTOW12/09/19 12:16 AM
11

Just avoid the chicks with blue hair, and you’ll be fine.
/r/MGTOW11/09/19 06:52 PM
11

You can’t work on ‘not giving a fuck’, as then, you are giving a fuck about not giving a fuck. A feedback loop. Just do what you enjoy and focus more on that, in time of habit, you’ll not give a fuck about things you don’t enjoy, or be too busy immersed in not giving a fuck to give a fuck. Right now, you seem to be not thinking about not thinking.. .
/r/MGTOW08/09/19 12:08 AM
3

All wisdom seems to start with ‘jerk reactions’, impulse behavior favoring ‘vox populi’ standing, and common-man thinking. Then, absorption of the questions, pondering them over and over, trying to answer them, makes a new question: “ did I know anything about the subject”? Then, illumination and clarity. One’s own evolutionary opinion changing with every nuance exposed as part of the subject. “Maybe, the popular and common thought by common people is because common people are too busy to care a…
/r/MGTOW07/09/19 10:17 PM

Tindr is awesome if you have game. why do I make this proposition? Every girl I have met off tinder says they came over to my place because I didn't seem creepy and could flirt. Post-coitus, so secrets are shared. Likewise, when I pry further into their tinder past, they have over 400+ matches, and meet up with only a few guys out of that mass. Out of all of those guys they meet up with, a few are total duds, and others they fuck. we can guess at numbers and how easy she is, but they all say the…
/r/seduction17/09/16 01:24 AM
1

Here is my interpretation, take it with a grain of salt, as I dont know you. You're trying to be, or idealizing, something you are not. This is why you are compensating, and subsequently saying stupid things (since you failed to communicate the results you desired). If communication is said to be the response it gets. What if, she was actually into guys who read shit/great works and liked to be tested, and she actually liked your response. Would you be so socially inept or just more lucky? As he…
/r/seduction16/06/16 04:52 AM
1

OK, I get it now. You're saying they do this for 'love' (abstract validation and acceptance), and not necessarily 'the love of women' (specifically validation from women), which I foolishly inferred from your sentence. I totally agree with you, and this is the line that drives the point home for me : "Why would someone spend years going in front of audiences, bombing, dealing with nerves, drunks, etc" That investment speaks volumes to intention. Great post man.
/r/seduction10/04/16 07:48 AM
2

I can tell you first hand that two major gurus, most popular at the start of the PUA movement and its golden age, are completely narcissistic and one is diagnosed with Bipolar disorder of some type - as per his disclosure. There exists a genius hidden in most madness, and often a necessary delusion driving creativity. How the narcissism is harnessed towards getting laid or being loved is their strength, and how little they know of their 'psychosis' as a double-edge sword, is their usual undoing.…
/r/seduction07/04/16 06:06 AM
2

PUAs are like comedians, in that, comedians need the validation of women? The way this is written makes it seem like that's what you're saying, and im wondering if that is what you mean. It's an interesting entanglement.
/r/seduction07/04/16 05:52 AM
8

Word. /\
/r/seduction02/03/16 03:24 AM
2

I would study more and get better marks. Remember, you're there for the purpose of excelling in a future career. Long term, women want a man with a good job, and financial stability. With enough money you can bang anyone! I would say, never take college dating serious and only maintain a relationship under the known probability that any investment into it is temporary and a loss (time, money, energy). Women in college are ignorantly emboldened to "find themselves", and in my experience, that mea…
/r/seduction02/03/16 02:32 AM
1

thanks for the response. wow, that is uncommon. my next question: does she have small children? I ask this now out of the curiosity that perhaps it's because she has no adult communication if she is looking after kids all day. I have friends with kids and friends who work boring jobs, and they text as an escapist means to stay sane throughout the day, and it's usually future planning or venting. I find this topic so interesting, so forgive my questioning as to "why" she texts so often (the causa…
/r/seduction16/01/14 09:41 AM
9

Is this girl younger than 23 by chance? I have come to notice younger girls consider texting the same as talking. They use terms like "smh" to imply contempt and ddisagreement; as if they are applying body language to the tool that lacks all matters of verbal communication. They type things that would otherwise require tonality to understand the meaning. On top of this, they love using emoticons and even dl aps allowing them more emoticons. I only notice this because every girl i date is usually…
/r/seduction15/01/14 09:28 PM
1

Well man, you know you better than anyone else. So take what I have said with a grain of salt if what you're doing is giving you more results. after all, its all about results. Great work btw! It was those highlights of past nights, just good results with something I had no idea would go over well, that pushed me through also. I guess on a behavioral level, pleasure - pleasure from doing what you enjoy that equals passion - is the best motivator. Thanks for the response, and keep at what works f…
/r/seduction13/01/14 10:05 PM
2

I have never been into this "just have fun" approach. if you're going to have fun there should not be a motive other than having fun; now que the "picking up women is fun"guy. yes, picking up women is fun, while also being terrifying. its a hunt and adventure, it's a game where you may win,loose and most of the time draw (if we consider the long term costs of such endevors). but i think, like a hunter going out to kill a deer or something, or a professional ANYTHING, that the point of such trips…
/r/seduction08/01/14 11:25 PM
1

can you read? I resort to saying "hey" to get sex. what is all 'this'? is it three letters too long? should I just say "he", or perhaps just "h"? dipshits of reddit seem to never miss lending their expert opinion.
/r/seduction20/12/13 10:00 AM
1

First off all, RSD has always seemed 'culty' and foolish to me. They have some good advice but constantly implement negative self-doubt to the observer/listener in all their products. Manson, I am unfamiliar with but love his music (perhaps that comment belongs in r/dadjokes). I would say, take what you hear with a grain of salt. These are not academics, this is not a text book with academic citations, there is no reason to internalize this stuff outside of a flexible reference. Further, I would…
/r/seduction16/12/13 10:32 AM
1

you're right. I'll just send some poor taste and pseudo-cocky texts next time. How about: "Let’s go to a crowded party or bar to socialize exclusively with ourselves." or, "Just wanted you to know that I’m new to the neighborhood and am required by law to tell you that." maybe some other cheep chump message found on that over sized list. But wait, I don't care to placate a women's desire to be distracted and validated in the comfort of her pajamas. I want to meet up in person! Really?!? overthin…
/r/seduction16/12/13 12:55 AM
2

it's true man. know enough people and go out enough times, and you'll meet a lot of 'infected' people. It's best to be highly selective in regard to partners.
/r/seduction16/12/13 12:51 AM
20

Dance clubs are an environment for women to establish a rather base sexual value and validation at the efforts of men [noticeable in cover charge policy]. It's purely eye/ body contact and impression management via grooming, garments and dancing proficiency. I would, as soon as you enter, NOTICE THE BAR, notice the quite spots - or connection extractions where you will take a girl after establishing enough attraction - and then look for the girls that are wanting to meet people. AVOID all women …
/r/seduction15/12/13 10:30 AM
1

Overly talkative is bad if you have nothing to say. a sort of holding court is only good if you're maintaining attention because you are saying funny to profound things. I have always considered the person who says what needs/should be said to further the group status and agenda is the most valued person in said group. If you bring value or levity to the group, you will be honored by the group, and those virtues arnt necessarily correlated with chatter boxing (talking a lot). IF however, you are…
/r/seduction15/12/13 10:19 AM
4

OK. This was hard to read but I'll attempt an answer that hopefully will suffice. 'These guys' should be replaced with 'guys who achieve results'. It has nothing to do with women in abstraction, as all results, or the frequency of their accomplishment in a desired way COMES WITH PRACTICE. I have never met a person with a desire and goal, come to an event or process which they are still unfamiliar, and be confident. Confidence is a byproduct of competence and competence is a matter of exposure an…
/r/seduction15/12/13 10:09 AM
1

Frankly im surprised by all the down votes I got. It seems the Lotharios of reddit prefer to needlessly waste time and placate to their own egoisms rather than have sex. I just imagine some guy sending a complex and over thought out, semi-funny, 'cock-funny' David D nonsense opener and then high fiveing their 'wingman' as they play COD all night. GUYS, the goal is to get with her, not to emotionally validate her and run the clock on her phone. Frankly, this is an opener. Openers are anything tha…
/r/seduction15/12/13 09:55 AM
1

HAHA. In text speak, they are the same thing. But yeah, I like ";]" much more also! NOICE
/r/seduction15/12/13 09:29 AM
1

Seeing as how it works for me, I would assume that your not creating enough attraction while/before getting the number. Results are what matter, not your interpretation, and frankly, people arnt that complex when/as they are waiting for a person they like to call. Notice also, its an OPENER. the goal is to OPEN a convo. You can say anything that initiates a reply. Simplicity vs over thinking = results. Efficiency over complexity never hurt any system [except for maybe the space program, :}]. To …
/r/seduction15/12/13 09:27 AM
-11

I always liked "hey". Girls use it all the time, and if you do it past 11PM, and have established enough sexual interest, there is no need to be complicated. We all know what "HEY" means and lead to. If you have her number, you should have only got it under the pretex of sexual interest and attraction. If you got her number on the fly, because you didn't have an adequate chance to create such desirable sexual tension, then you need to open her as you think. To do this, "hey" still works pretty g…
/r/seduction14/12/13 02:25 AM
1

that's brilliant
/r/seduction14/12/13 02:22 AM
2

When do you feel comfortable in your own skin, when you do feel comfortable in your own skin? What is the variable at work that makes you feel comfortable in your own 'skin'? How do you then, personally, apply that variable to the 'skin' you feel uncomfortable in, to feel comfortable in? Perhaps it's easier to explain this way, rather then questions: You are asking how to feel a 'state', be that an internal state, a mental state, a physical state, or all of the above. If 'states' change, how do …
/r/seduction10/10/13 06:23 PM
1

IF she's not responding back it can be because of these reasons: 1.She was interested enough in conversation, but not invested enough in you to feel gain or loss in her changed 'normal' state later; not invested enough to pursue you as an option. Generalization of behavior at work: 1.For a woman, it takes a lot of mental-emotional effort to decide to see a guy unless it's what she really wants to do, but even then they generally have a process of looking-feeling good enough to 'go out' (prepping…
/r/seduction10/10/13 06:02 PM
39

it sounds more like you have matured. im 28, in college, living amoung a flood of what once appeared to be people just like myself but now appear too immature, little kids fresh out of highschool. the diffrence isnt them though, its me - im no longer interested in pulling random girls, drinking is a chore, drugs are boring and too costly, parties are nothing but a hassle calling people and cleaning up. this is what growing up is like. you end up partitioning your time, resources, energies and em…
/r/seduction01/08/13 04:52 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter