TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

WordsNotToLiveBy Archive

View 1 posts and 577 comments by WordsNotToLiveBy on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
38

WordsNotToLiveBy/r/MGTOW31/01/16 10:42 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

That's a very idealistic way of approaching it. Where there are high value folks with no flaws and no urges outside of their direct interactions. In reality, people are more complicated than that. Otherwise, they have successfully got you to buy into to the version of themselves they are selling, and not revealing the entirety of who they are. Plus it sounds like you could be describing 80% of Reddit. Majority posts that include women have no shortage of thirsty guys. I wish this wasn't the case…
/r/RedPillWomen25/06/21 05:21 PM
3

The reason why I put this on women, is because women have always been the gatekeepers of sex. Whereas, men's say usually comes in during commitment. Men are always going to be attracted to women's physical beauty. So if women are giving it away so freely, it's not men that should be trained to avert their gaze, although plenty of men do. The control should be taken back by women. And the way to do that is to fight against popular ideologies that go against this.
/r/RedPillWomen25/06/21 03:13 PM
7

I agree. The problem is women don't police their own behaviors. They don't collectively shame other women for what older generations would have deemed degrading and look down upon it. Certainly men cannot, or else they'll be called sexist and in the way of female empowerment. It's within women at large to make a firm stand against this and say it isn't empowerment, it will only lead to more seeking attention, depression, validation in the wrong ways, and create a bad foundation for younger girls…
/r/RedPillWomen24/06/21 05:03 PM
8

It wasn't always there. It was more of a naughty thing teenage boys did when they discovered someone older's secret stash or found a dirty mag in the woods somewhere. It was rare and mostly an anomaly once upon a time. But now it's an alternate solution if it becomes too much trouble dealing with dating. For men, it's part of a biological need. If they can suppress it, then they are more motivated to search out a relationship in order to have that need fulfilled. But if that path is frustrating …
/r/RedPillWomen24/06/21 07:27 AM
22

Many men no longer feel the incentive to do that anymore. For instance, when the pool of women are also shrinking with the obesity rates going up, Feminism taken hold in most universities, plus the overwhelming cons attached to marriage (including most divorces initiated by women) it's leaving men with the feeling that to live a content life no longer means clawing their way to a top level paying job, when a decent level will be more than enough for them to pay for their hobbies, get a big enoug…
/r/RedPillWomen24/06/21 07:17 AM
2

That's an accurate way of looking at it. Ultimately it's all connected in some fashion, but I just wanted to reiterate that tired ol' complaint is often misconstrued. It's much more complex than that, and you punctuated it succinctly.
/r/RedPillWomen09/02/21 06:28 PM
1

This is a misconception that gets uttered way too often. This has nothing to do with men and need to remove all this talk of Patriarchy. The confusion in that regards is that it may be encouraged in a "professional" setting to "look your best," but for the average and majority of men, they don't care much about it at all. If you asked them, they'll say they prefer no makeup. And yes, that also means when you look "tired" or "sick" or whatever. Men value being genuine a lot more, but they won't a…
/r/RedPillWomen09/02/21 05:38 PM
3

Translation: He doesn't like the Kim Kardashian/Kyle Jenner/Instagram Influencer look. What you should take away from this: Wear the moderate amount that you are currently wearing for appropriate occasions, but keep it much more natural when it's a more causal setting. Especially if it's just the two of you.
/r/RedPillWomen23/12/19 09:30 PM
2

Dude, why are you arguing with him? He likes what he likes. You're not going to change his feelings on that, the same way we can't make someone like another person no matter how hard we try.
/r/MensRights02/03/19 07:28 PM
1

Perhaps I can caveat it with, most people should listen/watch reviews of folks they trust AND try and avoid as much spoilers as possible. Some reviewers give away too much. Maybe just watch part of the first trailer and decide if it's worth it. If it looks good, stop it there and go watch it when it releases and make your own judgment. If it looks bad from the first 30 secs of the trailer than keep watching to see if it looks any better by the end. If not, then you can see if the reviewers you t…
/r/MensRights27/02/19 09:06 PM
1

I would suggest to only listen to the reviews of the folks you trust, who have similar tastes and thinking as you. Add that to the impression you got from the trailer(s), and then decide if it's worth watching in the theater, or just waiting it out until it's released in VOD/Bluray/Etc.
/r/MensRights26/02/19 08:08 PM
-1

It's not gendered? Since when? It's always been gendered throughout history. Also man in this case isn't like "mankind", it actually comes with inclusions of masculinity.
/r/MensRights21/11/18 07:51 PM
2

This should be posted on r/videos and see what the comments will be like there?
/r/MensRights20/11/18 08:05 PM
3

No. You miss the point again. Man up used to mean so much more than just "suck it up." It meant be a man = be better. Means step up your game. Work harder, etc etc. Perhaps the problem was when it was being used and the context in which it was being used. It's perfectly fine to cry when you fall and hurt yourself, but then you can't just keep crying all day. You have to "Man Up" eventually. You get back up and try again. Manning up in that instance also means not quitting just because you fell a…
/r/MensRights20/11/18 07:58 PM
7

JazzTheGoose123 is absolutely right. In many ways, men do have to "man up." But it's being used in a derogation way. Men have to man up in the same way, men have to get up when they get knocked down. It's part of what lead to great achievements throughout history. And bottling it up is subjective from person to person. Let's be perfectly honest, not everyone likes to blab about their feelings, especially to a stranger. And maybe some things men have to know they can only deal with themselves bec…
/r/MensRights20/11/18 07:41 PM
3

/r/TotallyNotAliens
/r/PussyPassDenied17/11/18 03:50 AM
3

Sad to say, there's plenty of videos out there where it didn't end well in similar situations. It's not really a rabbit hole I recommend going down.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/11/18 08:46 PM
68

I find human behavior incredibly fascinating. Take humans throughout history all over the world, when they get confronted with a deadly weapon that could go off any second based on what they do at that moment would go into panic. Most humans would see their lives flash before their eyes and freeze in fear following every direction they are given. The very fact that she exhibited none of that speaks volumes. You have to wonder what kinds of mammals or creatures in the wild would ever not show any…
/r/PussyPassDenied16/11/18 08:30 PM
2

Yeah. I see where you're coming from. I'm getting less and less bothered by it. I mean, I kinda wanted to play a real World War II game... made with the same standard we've gotten used to. Ultimately, this annoyance will pass, and most people will forget about it. The gameplay will be what determines if it has longevity and success. I guess, I just don't see DICE revisiting this particular time period again for a long long while. So in that sense, I was kinda hoping for as much of the authentic …
/r/MensRights18/07/18 11:09 AM
1

Okay. Fine. You've won me over. Women in WWII games = perfectly fine. I'm on board. Now let's move on to some of these issues. I'm sure they'll be addressed any day now...
/r/MensRights17/07/18 07:22 PM
2

Not being 100% realistic and taking some liberties =/= going all out fantasy. Yes, you're right. They were never a 100% exact when it came to all sorts of things, but the key was they were close enough. And that's all they had to be. BF1 has women in the game, and all is well b/c it was in the context of the time period. If BFV includes female French Resistance fighters or female Russian Snipers, then all will be well again. Battlefield might have guns that weren't exactly like they were in real…
/r/MensRights17/07/18 07:15 PM
3

Your first issue was that there were women in the game. This right there tells me you never actually got any of what I was talking about. It was never about women in the game. Women were in the last game (BF1.) Women are in plenty of games out right now. So at this point I don't know what you're upset about. Man, I really don't know what to tell you. I can only explain it in so many ways. If you don't get it by now. I'm not sure if you'll ever get it. I'm gonna try one last time... (1.) It's not…
/r/MensRights16/07/18 07:14 PM
1

I'm seeing we're just going around in circles here. Why do you keep saying the same things over and over? I feel like I'm still talking to the Pake1000 from the very start of this discussion. Myth #1: Battlefield was never about accuracy. Response: It was close enough. Most gamers are okay if they make the attempt and it's believable. Myth #2: People are just crying about female characters in games. Response: BF1 had female soldiers, no one complained. Plenty of games right now have female chara…
/r/MensRights16/07/18 07:05 PM
1

They can make it a shooter for any time period they want. It doesn't have to be historically accurate, especially since the previous games were not. Of course. They can make whatever they want. They are a private company, but there was not one single clue prior to the release trailer that they were going to make an alternate version of WWII. So just about everyone expected a normal take on it. Even today, people in the BF subs are asking whether they'll still have the D-Day campaign, or the othe…
/r/MensRights16/07/18 06:03 PM
3

Flexibility everyone's fine with (eg. Black soldiers/Russian Female snipers in BF1 because they existed even if not prominent.) British female combat soldiers with pirate arms and samurai swords in a WWII game is not flexible. It's contortion at the levels that would make Chinese gymnasts' heads spin.
/r/MensRights15/07/18 11:00 PM
1

IT'S A GAME. IT'S ALL ABOUT GAMEPLAY. No shit. They are choosing to add female models to make it fun for others. Than make it a modern shooter. Problem solved. After the first time DICE saw a person reenter a plane in flight, they could have easily fixed. They didn't. They chose enjoyment over realism to make players happier. That's besides the point you brought up initially. You pointed out the unrealism of doing it, but I told you that DICE didn't have that as their intention. Their intention …
/r/MensRights15/07/18 10:56 PM
1

And to your point, there isn't a problem if and when they do include the French Resistance and the Soviet Union, it would be perfectly fine to include the women soldiers in context. That's not the debate. You keep using the "crazy gameplay" to argue the out-of-place elements. I don't know how many times it can be said. It's not about the gameplay. No one is even remotely talking about how the game is played, it's about how the game looks. Basic argument: You make the game look believable, and le…
/r/MensRights15/07/18 08:59 PM
2

But why care when you don't even get to see what your character looks like while playing? And when did it ever matter to look like the character? Do you have to look like the character when you play in a zombie game or Mario Bros or Sonic or Pokemon, etc? This is a dumb argument because never in all my years of playing games did I ever think "this game is terrible b/c this character doesn't look like me." And you're right. I wasted my time putting thought into my reply when most of the time peop…
/r/MensRights15/07/18 08:48 PM
0

Your constant cursing shows you don't really have a point.
/r/MensRights15/07/18 08:42 PM
1

And having women characters will not strip a person from being immersed in a believable environment. Except in no old war footage was there any imagery of women in the front lines. And what people think of when they think WWII is something like Band Of Brothers. It's not a knock at women. They should be remembered for stepping up when all the men were shipped off to fight the war. They jumped on the assembly lines to provide support for the war, they held down their home countries so they functi…
/r/MensRights15/07/18 08:40 PM
3

I've already addressed this topic in many other replies here. I'll say this. Let's say your point of view is law. And that's how it's going to be. Then where do we draw the line? I'm asking honestly. So from here on out we should expect to not follow any sort of rules? Meaning if they say they're making a Vietnam War game, we should not automatically assume it's going to take place in Vietnam or have Americans fighting Viet Cong? So it's perfectly okay to have a Vietnam War game to have players …
/r/MensRights15/07/18 05:28 AM
2

If that's how they include it, I don't think anyone would have a problem. But that's not what we saw. We saw an African soldier with a katana in an British or Ally force.
/r/MensRights15/07/18 05:17 AM
3

I'm having to say this over and over. It's never about women in games. Most games out today have female playable characters. If people had a problem with women in games, they would have spoken up much earlier. It's about wanting to a WWII game that resembles WWII. I'm not really sure how more simple I can put that. If they want a alternate version, they can play COD or Wolfenstein. And about the erasing men's sacrifices stuff. Do you know what people started doing immediately when it was announc…
/r/MensRights15/07/18 05:15 AM
2

It's never about what you do than what the world looks like. We all accepted from the very beginning that this was more like an arcade shooter combined with realistic elements. What you're talking about is a military simulator. Immersion is about selling the idea that the player is actually in a believable environment. What they can do in that world is only limited by their imagination. People asked for WWII, they didn't ask for an alternate universe version of WWII. And they don't expect a mil-…
/r/MensRights15/07/18 05:02 AM
2

Exactly. Which is why one side keeps saying... "all they had to do was make a Bad Company 3 game or a modern shooter and include all the men/women/whatever and we'd all go with it. But don't sell us WWII with sci-fi characters. And certainly don't spring it on everyone not expecting it."
/r/MensRights15/07/18 04:52 AM
1

How is that shit? You're equating the idea of doing crazy stunts to fantasy elements in a game. No one in the history of the franchise or gaming in general ever cared or complained that people could do epic things in a game. They just want the immersion to feel like the world they're in makes sense to the context. I'm sure there's a simpler way to explain it, but if you can't get that, then I don't know what to tell you.
/r/MensRights15/07/18 04:49 AM
0

Realistic gameplay mechanics =/= realistic world setting. The argument isn't about what you're doing is realistic or not, but that the jet, rocket launcher, and soldier you do it with is.
/r/MensRights14/07/18 07:14 AM
3

You're right. Fixed* the wording, but the point is still the same. When the foundations of the world they create feels real, they can tinker with small changes here and there because it won't break immersion. But having Samurai swords in a WWII game goes against what people were expecting.
/r/MensRights14/07/18 07:03 AM
9

No. I'm talking about -- just because it pertains to something you're not interested in, doesn't mean it's not interesting to many other people. Just like issues in sports. Just because a segment of Redditors couldn't be bothered with sports, doesn't mean it's not happening. And how that translates in this case and my point is that the Gaming industry is not some niche section of entertainment. It's a multi-billion dollar industry. It's one of the few industries that didn't slow down during the …
/r/MensRights14/07/18 06:42 AM
1

I get what you're saying. And you speak the truth, but you're referencing a game from 2002 when graphics were simple and gaming was in its infancy. They're capable of showing every little detail now, and people are getting more educated on these matters. Yes, those things you mention are not 100% accurate, but the overall feel of those games were. And that's the point. The cake doesn't have to be 100% chocolate, but as long as it resembles a cake and isn't inundated with almonds and raisins and …
/r/MensRights13/07/18 10:22 PM
2

That's DICE's little way out. They included high tech in the final DLC of BF4, but even the craziest of weapons/gadgets/etc that they included in the game were actually out there. Experimental, sure, but they still existed or the tech existed on some level. Even if it wasn't quite polished yet. In that same sense, even if the weapons were very rarely used or might have made just one of it, that was good enough for DICE. The point there I'm assuming is to make a boring low tech shooter more fast …
/r/MensRights13/07/18 10:03 PM
8

Why make it a WWII game then? You want to play as a woman, I want to play as a woman, and other people want to play as a woman. Great! So make it a modern shooter, or tell the community they are doing an alternate universe version and they're going to go all out with it. Done. Problem solved. But why try to sell a WWII game and change how WWII was? Why did it have to be WWII? Why not make it the Iraq War or make it WWIII. Again... it's never about women in games. If it were, then why do we have …
/r/MensRights13/07/18 09:52 PM
8

Except they are. Here's the thing. When the current game out was BF4, most of the Battlefield community was begging for a WW game. So many wanted to play an authentic WW experience, hopefully WWII as they saw it in documentaries and such, but done in the great Frostbite Engine and with an acclaimed dev team like DICE. They knew that DICE was going to bring their own level of excellence that you wouldn't get in COD or Counter Strike or even military simulators. They got BF1 a WWI game that was ve…
/r/MensRights13/07/18 09:45 PM
15

You shouldn't be. Video games is played by millions of kids, teens, and adults. They are being inundated with bs that will not be good in the grand scheme of things. You think you're here fighting for Men's Rights, but when all the opposing harmful ideology is seeping into young people where they spend most of their time, it will not have a good outcome when it reaches your neck of the woods. If you think MR only pertains to the court systems and relationships, then that is being blind to everyt…
/r/MensRights13/07/18 09:35 PM
11

I'm incredibly disappointed and somewhat sad of reading this. Video games may not be something you're interested in or even think is pertinent in any way, but you should probably know that the video game industry was one of the very few that got hit by the recession. In 2008 when the economy crashed and people weren't going out to movies or to restaurants, interestingly enough they were still buying games. The video game industry is a multi-billion dollar industry. But all that aside, what troub…
/r/MensRights13/07/18 09:30 PM
14

Ah, the o'l BF was never accurate or a history documentary. If you were one of the players from the early days, you'd know that the bulk of all their games was grounded in history. When the foundations are accurate, no one will mind if they tweek little things here and there b/c overall everything still feels historically accurate realistically perceived. You still feel the general sense of the world they have built. That's not the same as making major changes then selling the "immersion" and "r…
/r/MensRights13/07/18 08:07 PM
2

I'm totally fine with that. I upvoted the post, but it's funny when you think about it. The sub where an opposing view point can make the front page "needs this sort of post", whereas, a sub where the opposing viewpoint would never make it past the shadow realms of the downvote abyss isn't allowed to have people there to tell them they could use more posts from the other perspective.
/r/MensRights09/07/18 07:34 PM
19

The difference is no one on this side is denying there are abusers out there or this sort of thing exists. Also, a post like this getting upvoted as much as it has versus wouldn't see the light of the front page on "other subs" is a clear indicator that one side is willing to have this discussion and open to opposing view points. The other side isn't interested in that.
/r/MensRights08/07/18 08:07 PM
3

You forget, the video is for us. Those people sitting on the couch didn't need the video footage. She pointed it out right away, and they all acknowledged it. If she decided to press charges, then there were witnesses. P.s. Even if there are no one around, make an official complaint right away when the event is fresh in your mind. You can give detailed descriptions of everything and have it made for official records. Even if nothing comes of it, there will be an exact account of it, so if the pe…
/r/MensRights08/07/18 07:57 PM
2

Then you don't know his political leanings. He's no staunch activist or anything, but he's clearly not leaning to the extreme left.
/r/MensRights21/05/18 09:29 PM
5

Oh there's plenty out there that will let you split the check, but don't be fooled for a sec that it isn't floating around in the back of their mind. They'll remember it and wonder "is he not successful enough?" "Is he ambitious enough that will allow him to pay later on down the road?" "Are we going to have to slum it for a long while before it gets good?" Etc etc.
/r/MensRights21/05/18 09:19 PM
2

Yeah, but in that case it would seem the best way to attain that would be to pay a professional. The chances of finding a diamond in the rough who can give you that mindblowing bj you're referring to is slim to none. It's like finding the BJ Unicorn.
/r/askTRP18/05/18 09:35 PM
3

Nah. Not really. It's more like when you're young, you hunger for experiences you haven't had yet. Once you've had them, and plenty of it, you get a lot of that out of your system and no longer need it as much. It's true about it being over-rated. It's immediate satisfaction, like food is immediate satisfaction, but there's more to the rest of the day than chasing restaurants.
/r/askTRP18/05/18 09:32 PM
1

And it's far more common "tradition" for women to abuse men openly and freely with no consequence. What's your point? Two different things. You're assuming I'm saying abusing either gender is good b/c it's tradition. I am not. Firstly, I don't think this is abuse. And I already said that if anyone in this scenario feels abused, then that changes everything. This isn't about "all aspects of life". I believe it is. I'm of the mind that if we make a big stink about this, then it will create a socie…
/r/MensRights14/05/18 08:36 PM
1

The way you say it, makes me visualize someone doing it on a city street while some single mother is buying clothes for their child and being harassed by some disgusting man with dirty clothes and missing teeth. But things are very different in context. What we're talking about here is during a sports game. It's become somewhat tradition for fans from the stands to run out on the field. No matter the country. Some places they are predominantly streakers, some they run out and hug the star athlet…
/r/MensRights12/05/18 07:38 PM
4

It's an alert to their friends around them that a pretty girl walked in their vicinity. It's to get the attention of the girl. The original idea was that she could look up and see the guy showing interest who whistled and acknowledge whether that guy is attractive enough to return a positive response. In other words, it's the analog version of swiping right on Tinder (whichever direction means they're interested.) Like most things, this became more and more archaic as time and technology advance…
/r/MensRights11/05/18 07:32 PM
1

That's the thing though. It all depends on a case-by-case basis. Sometimes it really is just a goof, and there was no malice in their intent. While other times it is, and they should be charged with a crime. People must also be allowed to be silly or make mistakes, as long as they aren't harmful or dangerous. If the person(s) on the receiving end felt violated, then we have a case that needs to be looked at by the courts, but if they don't then a calm and rational approach would be the best to t…
/r/MensRights11/05/18 07:14 PM
1

Common sense would suggest that we treat each situation on a case-by-case basis. Sometimes we might be dealing with an aggressive situation where someone could have been physically harmed. For those cases, they be should charged and found guilty or innocent in court. For most other cases, we have to be mindful to not blow things out of proportion. The importance of intent and height of danger should be taken into context. If they're low, then we should give them "a slap on the wrist" (a warning)…
/r/MensRights11/05/18 07:04 PM
1

People's sensitivity and mental health is so fragile because we make it so. Making a mountain out of a mole hill is how we got to such a sensitive society. And if you're concerned about people's mental health, then these posts aren't where you'll apply solutions. You'll have to write you representatives, vote in local elections, let them know any way possible that we need more facilities to treat such individuals. Implausible. No way for you to have access to people’s mental thoughts. It's fairl…
/r/MensRights09/05/18 06:43 PM
0

Okay, now think about how we're going to get rid of that double standard? It won't be by trying to create an even bigger or equal uproar about this. Both sides are just going to push each other to react louder and point out every injustice, even if there isn't one there. How about trying to dial it back? Have we tried that yet? What if a post like this was created, but instead of lacing it with outrage, it was narrated with some measured sensibility? For example: "Girl rushes field at college wo…
/r/MensRights09/05/18 06:31 PM
37

Eh. Maybe instead of adding one more thing to get outraged out, perhaps we need to return to sensibility. She's going to get in trouble, even if it's a slap on the wrist. Either way, she's not really endangering anyone's life. Nor she making anyone feel scared or uncomfortable. IF SHE IS, then the player(s) who felt that way can press charges. And that's should be the end of this story. We really don't need to be trying to make this into the "outrage Olympics" competing about which side is more …
/r/MensRights09/05/18 02:22 AM
2

Unprovoked is another way of saying starting arguments. In this case, arguments that lead to things being thrown and/or hitting. So why wouldn't there be a rise of one side doing it more as that same side is going through their own renaissance and rise in power? This particular side is being encouraged to be more forceful, be more aggressive in negotiations, be more self-reliant and more selfish. You don't think telling a whole group of people to step up, fight back, and take what is yours going…
/r/MensRights08/05/18 08:22 PM
8

That's nothing. You can get banned just for posting here. Most of 'those' subs have a user list of people who have commented or posted on MR subs who are on autobans.
/r/MensRights08/05/18 07:54 PM
3

Not to be an antagonist, but you're on MRA sub, have you not seen any of the countless articles and posts covering pretty much every claim that is made int his video? Assuming you are new here, check out the side bar, check out documentaries like The Red Pill, and google them. They're readily found statistics. And no offense, but some of those are also common sense or should be clear as day. For instance, why wouldn't men have the higher work deaths? When it's clear all the dirty, rough, dangero…
/r/MensRights08/05/18 07:52 PM
3

I'm afraid things are only going to get worse before it gets better.
/r/MensRights26/04/18 08:30 PM
1

You're missing the point. There is no reason to get into the "technical" reality of the show or what percentage of that show was actually involving gay men telling straight women what is fashionable. The point was that the guy responding to the tweet got the impression from what he's seen/heard around him to put in the qualifier of "straight men."
/r/MensRights16/10/17 08:18 PM
10

That's not what TV would have everyone believe. They used to have shows with gay characters making comments about women's dress (Will & Grace,) reality shows where gay men judged women on their outfits (Project Runway,) and would even dress women who didn't know how to dress (What Not To Wear/ Queer Eye For The Straight Girl.) It's obviously just a drop in the ocean, but it still sticks in your brain.
/r/MensRights15/10/17 08:32 PM
4

She brought it upon herself for bringing it up in the first place... right off the bat. What she didn't realize is that what she thinks is a privilege the men have is actually a limitation, but b/c "the grass is always greener..." she thinks it's something men love. It didn't even don on her that maybe guys would like more options or that men might have equal stigma put on them if they strayed too far from that limited option they have. She thinks it's a privilege b/c men don't whine and complai…
/r/MensRights15/10/17 08:21 PM
6

No it's not, it's called being wishy-washy. The person on the other side will appreciate it more if you get to the point and don't waste either your's or their time. "Hello, I'm calling about the Iphone you have for sale. Do you have a few minutes to talk?" BAM. To the point, no confusion, they know what this is regarding right off the bat, and you were polite as well.
/r/MGTOW24/08/17 08:31 PM
1

They should learn from Rick & Morty situation. Made the writing room 50/50 and the show drops in quality. New season doesn't resemble the first two. Show is focusing too much on the divorce and Summer, and getting less main characters. Also the jokes falling flat too.
/r/MGTOW14/08/17 08:43 PM
1

It does seem wild, doesn't it? What a crazy, mad world we live in.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/06/17 05:31 AM
–

Ah, yes... the second wave with the downvote brigade has arrived. Came to the PPD threads to see where you could inflict your downvote vengeance?
/r/PussyPassDenied26/06/17 01:49 AM
–

lol Oh, the irony.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/06/17 01:47 AM
-6

Don't take my reply as an overt slight towards what you wrote. I was piggy-backing on it to clarify the overall discussion on said movie. Also, it does need to be said b/c Reddit has a hard on for this movie, and we already know that just because Reddit likes a movie, doesn't mean it reflects the general public. The hype is real.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/06/17 06:02 AM
2

I have a feeling sentiments about this movie will level out after the honeymoon period is over. During this period people have their rose tinted glasses on and will downvote most comments that criticize it. After the bluray is released, then we'll see more evened reviews and more variety in opinions. Right now it's being spoken about as one of the best superhero movies made so far. The same was said about The Force Awakens the best SW film out so far, but that opinion has evened out also. My gue…
/r/PussyPassDenied25/06/17 01:25 AM
–

Just so you know, the whole "opening weekend" bit has been praised on Reddit countless times. "It broke records!" "Wonder Woman is a rousing success!" Except what they never admit is it still did the worst out of the other recent DC movies. As bad as each of them have been, they still did better than WW in the opening weekend. What WW did do is it just recently surpassed Man Of Steel in it's domestic take. And even then it has been described as "WW Soars Past MoS." That's a nice way of saying it…
/r/PussyPassDenied25/06/17 01:20 AM
154

This has got to be an old quote. There is no way he would ever even think to say such a thing now that he's working at The Daily Show.
/r/MGTOW18/06/17 12:40 AM
1

Agreed. This is just a showing, it's not like the entire theater decided never to sell to men. It's just a one off event. Let them have that. It's important that men show they are not bothered by this b/c next time when they want to invade a male only space, then everyone can look back at moments like these and call them out on their hypocrisy.
/r/MensRights14/06/17 12:24 AM
1

Maybe not the average girl, but that sort of entitlement is ubiquitous... and it's growing.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/06/17 11:35 PM
3

Just on a purely scientific basis, I'd be curious to see this scenario play out. Will they buy and use them, or will they just stick with dildos/vibrators because of the cost and they'll see both as inanimate objects anyway?
/r/MGTOW30/05/17 09:26 PM
2

Every post in all the different subreddits this story was posted on, the reoccurring mirror example as been Brock Turner. Strange that he was the only example ever brought up in all these posts. Brock Turner. Okay, great. What are we meant to do with that comment of yours? Thank you for sharing that one example. Shall we chalk it up to men and women get treated exactly the same under the law, and we should all pack it in now? What is it really that you want to say with your comment? That we shou…
/r/MensRights17/05/17 09:18 AM
2

Welcome to default Reddit.
/r/MensRights10/05/17 06:42 AM
2

If women were smart they would wholeheartedly embrace the men's rights movement, because at the end of the day we're rather benign and equal rights would ultimately help women as well (shared parenting for example). Not sure if they realize it, but by dragging men down in order to lift women up they are going to ultimately hurt themselves too. Just as rising tides lift all boats, so does low tides beach all boats. You think they are complaining now about "not finding a good man" or the happiness…
/r/MensRights10/05/17 06:37 AM
1

This chart is getting out dated. In order to representing present day and coming years you'll need to add college attendance, as well as, discrepancy in scholarships and grants. Also, hiring preferences and filling company quotas. Not to mention support & attendance campaigns, government assistance, and privately and publicly funded health & wellness programs. This chart just represents what happens when you're out there in the workforce, but forgets entirely the infrastructure and support prior…
/r/MensRights10/05/17 06:29 AM
2

I think the confusion here is that one term is used for male and male/female, and another term exists just for female. So what if you wanted to search just for male actor, which term would you use? And for the most efficient search result for female would you use the term for both male & female, or the one specifically for female? This whole argument throughout this comment section is a strange one. Not to mention, a rather benign argument to get worked up over. It's not really oppressing anyone…
/r/PussyPassDenied29/03/17 09:58 PM
1

That's a bit harsh, don't you think? Most people don't have all the links and followup information as if they are experts or journalists. Many times it's just some guy/gal who saw something and decided to share it. This is Reddit, not the BBC/CNN.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/03/17 11:43 PM
0

I'm curious... would you have clocked her or a girl half your size if she threw a drink in your face? And when I say clock, I mean exactly as hard as this guy did. Would you have cocked your arm back and swung as hard as you can at someone much smaller than you?
/r/PussyPassDenied09/03/17 07:32 AM
1

Okay, now picture a 100 pound girl going up to a rich Wall Street banker who's 180 lbs and threw a drink in his face. It's a good bet that he wouldn't have responded that way. That's an apples to apples comparison. You and I or you and some other guy from a fortune 500 company isn't a like for like comparison with this video.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/03/17 07:30 AM
1

So wouldn't the response be to try not to encourage the behavior? Why is clocking a much smaller (albeit annoying) girl in the face a good thing? Since when does having class and promoting good sense a bad thing now? Most people here are cheering the idea of sinking down to the gutter as the proper way of dealing with situations.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/03/17 07:22 AM
3

A drink in the face is measly and something that can be walked off, but a full on blow to the face often can't. This isn't the wild west where we shoot people for looking at your horse wrong. Can't have this kind of thing if we're trying to be the country that goes to Mars and cultivating a functioning society.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/03/17 10:10 PM
-2

Just remember a drink can be washed off, but a concussion or a broken jaw or a caved in cheek bone or any number of horrible injuries could have a lasting effect.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/03/17 10:04 PM
7

While I 100% agree with you, it's also not a good thing that there are humans acting like "gorillas" or having to tread lightly in our day to day lives because we walk amongst other humans who behave like "gorillas." She was about as dumb as dumb could be for what she did, but it's also horrible what he did. Imagine what a person like that would do after being cut off on the road or cut in line at a movie theater and you spoke up? Her behavior was foolish, but his was undeniable dangerous.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/03/17 10:00 PM
-1

It's not just that she did what she did and he retaliated, but the manner in which he did it speaks volumes. It's not the kind of thing someone who'll be in a fortune 500 company or a successful productive member of society does. It's the kind of behavior that will lead him to life in prison after his 3rd felony charge. As much as the entitlement of people has to decrease, so does the kind of behavior that guy displayed. Both don't belong in an advancing functional society.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/03/17 09:54 PM
2

X being true, doesn't necessarily equate to Y. What humans find arousing or what they fap to doesn't necessarily translate to anything about their day to day behavior or lifestyle. Someone could be into incest porn or milf porn, doesn't mean they want to bang their own mom.
/r/PussyPass03/03/17 11:30 PM
6

They are the the more desirable because (a.) we've been party to it, & (b.) because of our hormones. That can change if things continue to progress in the direction all indicators suggest it's going. For example, treating men like crap and telling them that their biological needs are dirty, disgusting, & perverted is a bad first step. Secondly, technology is leveling the playing field. Everything from the ubiquity of porn, advancement in VR, and the multitude of things coming down the pipeline i…
/r/MensRights03/03/17 11:24 PM
9

Yeah, this would work better if it didn't use Garofalo. There's so many psychos to choose from, Janeane is pretty fuckin' chill.
/r/MGTOW17/02/17 08:08 AM
1

Wish I didn't just give that shitstain of a yt channel my views.
/r/PussyPass05/02/17 04:03 AM
15

That's included in what she's talking about. Supposedly offending her is the first step in that process of drama that would unfold, because most of the time a supervisor gets involved it's after the offended speaks up. Of course, the very fact that a woman is present will make the supervisor walk on eggshells.
/r/MensRights26/01/17 07:45 PM
6

You want non-fiction? I give you Nelson-fucking-Mandela.
/r/MGTOW18/01/17 09:33 PM
2

"You go girl!"
/r/MGTOW15/01/17 06:34 AM
2

Arguments aside, the fallout from this is going to be interesting. If it becomes widely known fact that a man can get charged with buying women drinks if she becomes drunk, then that might have an affect possibly on men stop buying women drinks. But I doubt you'll ever see a safety poster around the city/transit/etc telling men the hazards of buying women drinks.
/r/MensRights12/01/17 10:46 PM
1

Difference is Leo doesn't need to look like the way that magazine wishes he looked. He's got everything he needs already to bag in supermodels. He could turn into a fat rich stereotype and still never run out of supermodels to vacation with.
/r/MensRights20/12/16 08:43 PM
14

Justin Trudeau isn't Canada's Minister Of Defense.
/r/MGTOW03/12/16 12:17 AM
1

Thanks for sharing, but I wish you would have archived that link so we don't drive more traffic to their trash article. Caveat: I haven't opened up the link, so if it's not a direct link to the silly author, then discard what I said earlier.
/r/MensRights26/11/16 01:32 AM
7

Also why is it that it's bad to have sex robots, but perfectly fine to have a thousand varieties of vibrators & dildos? Hypocritical much? Those things can pulsate and twirl and massage, but you don't see men going into a hissy fit.
/r/MensRights26/11/16 01:23 AM
1

I'm just wondering why Reggie didn't just pay for a call girl? The pricey Wall Street pros look better and cost less than what he went with.
/r/PussyPass09/11/16 10:48 PM
6

The point being made there is, giving birth is an indicator of incredible pain threshold not of level of strength. That's why women of (practically) all shapes, sizes, and strength can give birth. Not just the strong ones.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/10/16 10:07 PM
1

This is exactly why men don't give them "shit tests." Because they almost always fail.
/r/MGTOW11/10/16 10:30 PM
6

A company called ProCamps organized the experience, and women paid anywhere from $299 to $2995 to attend. This wasn't even the poor or working class women. These are well to do with disposable income.
/r/MensRights06/10/16 11:01 PM
3

And (default) Reddit.
/r/MGTOW04/10/16 09:30 AM
2

I thought Reddit's feminist go-to poster child was Emma Watson?
/r/MGTOW23/09/16 09:24 PM
2

I would love to go into that comment section and point our their hypocrisy. The hypocrisy of the majority of Reddit tbh. Either, you stay steadfast in the "equality" mantra, or you recognize there are glaring differences. Reddit continues to preach conflicting dogmas simultaneously. The only reason I hesitate to do so more and more is because the usual response is one or two butthurt comments, and mostly just anonymous downvotes. That's the case 100% of the time, without fail. With the occasiona…
/r/MGTOW22/09/16 09:48 PM
11

You're both saying the same thing, or what would lead to the same conclusion. Basically, you can say whatever gender that passes the tests should be allowed, and they/statistics say only one gender is capable of successfully completing the Marine training at its highest standards. So this argument is mostly about semantics.
/r/PussyPass22/09/16 09:21 PM
15

Just remember, ladies, you wanted it this way!
/r/PussyPassDenied17/09/16 10:10 PM
25

If you notice when he's puffing that cigarette and acting nonchalant, that's what activates those harpies. It's his cool "don't give a fuck" demeanor that makes his words so unbearable that it sends them into a rage. It isn't until after he loses that "cool" that they switch off their rage. Fascinating study in behavior.
/r/MGTOW08/09/16 09:28 PM
1

For a second I thought this was going to be a completely different/new woman who took part in this experiment. This one is a few years old, too bad there haven't been more what with the growing divide.
/r/MensRights01/09/16 09:54 PM
-2

No. It's strange to see MRAs on the same wavelength as Feminists in thinking men and women are exactly the same. We are not. We're equal in the idea of worth, but we are very different in many ways. In most cases... men enjoy being touched and given such attention (generally) because they don't often experience it. In most cases... women don't enjoy being touched and given such attention (generally) because they experience it so often. Our lives and how we are treated are not "equal," and trying…
/r/MensRights10/08/16 11:07 PM
11

The problem isn't the all female cast. Of course. There are plenty of movies with a mostly female cast (& plenty of TV shows) already. The annoyance comes from taking established franchises and putting a transparent gimmick over it. If you have confidence in your product, then let it stand on its own merits, don't piggy back on an already established/beloved IP.
/r/MGTOW01/08/16 11:12 PM
1

She's better than 90% of them, but even she falls into that cliche of topics they almost every one of them talk about (their vagina, men's penis, how porn is horrible, how unattractive men are creepy, and why their parents are disappointed in them.)
/r/MGTOW27/07/16 10:34 PM
1

Thank you. Clicked the link and realized it's a direct link to her article. "Wow. Look at all the interest in my article." This should comment should be at the top. This should have been the post link.
/r/MensRights02/07/16 12:12 AM
1

and what would cause a reversal of those roles? MGTOW
/r/askTRP29/06/16 12:29 AM
1

That should still not skew your bullshit radar. Just because there's psychos in the world doesn't mean there aren't trolls who pretend to complain about psychos in the world.
/r/askTRP10/06/16 11:22 PM
4

I'm surprised how many of you think this is a real post.
/r/askTRP09/06/16 10:02 PM
1

Check out the account. It's brand new. Plus, just on the context alone, it screams FAKE!
/r/askTRP09/06/16 10:00 PM
4

Why not post the actual study?
/r/MGTOW06/06/16 09:43 PM
1

Allow me to play the devils advocate for a second... Could it be possible that all this talk is only elevating the idea of Rape more, when we should be handling it in a completely different way. Meaning, if we are going to treat it more seriously than it has been, are we not in an indirect way saying "your life is now ruined b/c you were raped." Society has now decided that "rape" is the worst thing to happen to someone. Yes, in many conversations you cannot even suggest that death is even worse…
/r/MensRights04/06/16 08:50 PM
6

I've said it once, I've said it a million times... just make prostitution legal and end this charade.
/r/MGTOW28/05/16 08:32 PM
12

They're certainly trying to spin it as such. Taking control and living life on your own terms, translates to in their mind, don't have a woman in your life so you're a loser and we didn't want you anyway. Just imagine all the insults they'll spew when VR porn and sexbots become the norm.
/r/MensRights25/05/16 09:48 PM
1

Still, I gotta agree with it.
/r/MensRights04/05/16 09:52 PM
16

"It's not because you have a cunt, it's because you're being a cunt."
/r/PussyPassDenied29/04/16 09:47 PM
1

What's the chances of this being fake?
/r/MGTOW26/04/16 10:10 PM
2

Has a lot to do with frequency. Men think about sex a lot more than women. For men releasing their seed is just as much a biological function as eating or pissing or breathing. Men want it a lot more, so it's seen as an annoying thing at times from women. Because of it men are thought of as pervs, or creepy, or too horny all the time. All of that has negative connotations. As for women (and frequency,) since they don't make sex nearly as much of a priority or a necessity or think about it as muc…
/r/MensRights19/04/16 09:57 PM
1

I'm waiting for the obi wan kenobi movie. If you are, then you haven't learned your lesson yet. Disney heads already admitted their female empowerment agenda is "purposeful." Even if they do produce an Obi Wan movie, it will be to further the agenda. He'll be second fiddle in his own movie and he'll likely go on and on about how his female partner is the better of the two. It's over for Star Wars (and all it's spinoffs.) They aren't interested in the origins of the franchise, but to spread their…
/r/MGTOW09/04/16 09:45 PM
2

Fuck, that was poetic. Should be on a bumper sticker.
/r/MGTOW09/04/16 09:39 PM
3

This is the bottom line truth (no pun intended.) I am curious though, how many people this movie has turned off? After being disappointed from TFA, and now from the new trailer, I've pretty much given up on Disney's take on Star Wars.
/r/MGTOW09/04/16 09:34 PM
3

Wow. That's a very interesting point. I hadn't looked at it from that angle. What a strange, but fitting depiction of gender values.
/r/MGTOW09/04/16 09:30 PM
2

The difference is they aren't doing it by choice.
/r/MGTOW06/04/16 08:55 PM
2

Disagree. It's all in how you carry yourself. The abused boyfriend the entire time was slouched in his seat, and pretty much spineless. If you carried yourself as if you aren't going to take anyone's shit, then magically you will reduce the amount of drama in your life. How you conduct yourself shows by example how others can and cannot behave around you. When someone breaks that covenant, you have to nip it in the bud, or else people walk all over you.
/r/MensRights29/03/16 09:57 PM
1

I wish we'd use archive links instead of posting directly.
/r/MensRights22/03/16 08:41 PM
6

MGTOW never meant for me to GMOW from everyone. It sucks you got screwed over the way you did, but I suspect you needed to be a better judge of character. I know many trustworthy and reliable men. Almost every male family member (brother, cousin, uncle, etc) of mine are reliable. And anyone I call a friend is also. The ones that aren't, fell into "acquaintance" category and we don't help one another move or do things that friend's would be responsible for. With those folks we do casual, frivolou…
/r/MGTOW15/03/16 10:12 PM
3

Becareful what you wish for. Awareness is one thing (if the stats/numbers are correct,) but the fear and over-reaction is the unintended consequences we don't want to happen. Raising flags only helps if it is accompanied by sensible solutions or restraint. Don't use a hammer if a scalpel will do. Just as the insane over-reaction that "no playground is safe" has led to children not being allowed to play on their own anymore, looking at every male suspiciously if he is alone in the park, and treat…
/r/MensRights11/03/16 09:53 PM
1

I get the point you're making, and it's a valid one, but I wouldn't use "net worth" for this particular example because what they accrued throughout their career doesn't pertain to the argument of gender pay gap during their time working on Harry Potter. Watson has gone on to have a lucrative modeling career while making other movies, and each of the other actors have had very different successes in Hollywood. So net worth regarding everything they've accomplished during and after their shared e…
/r/MensRights09/03/16 09:16 PM
1

Glad to help out. You should click subscribe next to my username, and follow me for more juicy tid bits. ;)
/r/askTRP22/02/16 07:57 PM
2

This seriously can't be an upvoted advice on here. The answer to her being shit shouldn't be him becoming a twat in return. Everyone on here speaks about being stoic and holding frame and what not. How about conducting one's self with honor? Not saying he shouldn't demote her into plate, but don't lie to her and make her think they have a life together. Start cutting down the lovey-dovey talks, reduce contact gradually, and become more casual with her. If he can pull other chicks at his college,…
/r/askTRP21/02/16 08:50 PM
5

Yeah, but they still lie about all those liberated trysts. No matter how advanced society seemingly gets, there is still something both sides inherently understand as being undesirable in a long term partner.
/r/askTRP19/02/16 08:16 PM
3

This is worse than watching a comic bomb. This fake improv. Like reality TV for comedians.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/02/16 10:39 PM
3

Not sure if she were loathed she'd get a sweet ad spot with Seth Rogan during the Super Bowl. She's doing much better than your average standup.
/r/MensRights08/02/16 08:41 PM
0

I think that skit can definitely be done today. He's Black so he will be given more leeway for controversial opinions. But if he wants to work with Disney or Dreamworks, then he will have to tone it down.
/r/MGTOW01/02/16 09:27 PM
4

True, but you're assuming people (young or old) won't be able to comprehend a healthy physique unless we're told what one looks like. It's inherent in all of us to spot what is healthy and what is not. It's part of our survival instincts. And Barbie is no more a role model as He-Man. They're toys that play up on our fantasies. For the same reason that comic books push the extremes and tap into the "amazing," "spectacular," "uncanny," etc. Turning them into mundane caricatures of every day people…
/r/MGTOW01/02/16 09:14 PM
1

Great point. I hadn't thought of that. My initial reactions are never of "but what about me (us) too?" I hadn't even considered whether they even think to apply that same logic towards the male dolls. That's interesting, but almost self explanatory. We all here know the reasons why they wouldn't address that.
/r/MGTOW01/02/16 08:21 PM
1

I think what you're describe are two sides of a coin. The same coin that illustrates mental assessment of any given situation under extreme stressful scenarios. One way would be to put your safety first, but in those situations you are describing where you, as well as, the rest of your squad are in direct danger and currently under fire. This is a bit more complicated as it suggests the same procedure as being in a commercial plane accident (eg. you attend to yourself first before attending to m…
/r/MGTOW01/02/16 08:14 PM
1

Can we get a TL;DW?
/r/MGTOW31/01/16 11:32 PM
6

$80K car is the dumbest mistake he made. That's not even remotely the most expensive mistake he's made.
/r/MGTOW31/01/16 11:28 PM
20

Very interesting point. It's fascinating that women want to try and broaden the idea of sexy, yet men don't. Men understand hitting the gym will get you a "sexier" body shape, and superheroes are supposed to look like they hit the gym. Also, as much as feminists try control the conversation of sexiness (eg. Disney doing away with all things Slave Leia henceforth,) they cannot stop Cosplayers from sexing up her image. The public themselves determine what is sexy and what is not. Hell, they even h…
/r/MGTOW31/01/16 11:11 PM
1

I'm not sure what you were expecting. This is typically what happens when you introduce women into all male environments. It's a given that you have to cater to everyone, including the new additions. Making dirty jokes with other men will not get you in as much hot water as it would with women. Men tolerate a lot with one another, in fact, you could say it's part of male relationships. We banter and playfully rib one another. That's not how it works with men and women. Things get real serious, r…
/r/MGTOW31/01/16 11:01 PM
12

This is an oldie, but goodie. Interesting side note, this is one of the criticisms of having female soldiers in combat situations. Even female soldiers admitted that, having a woman in their squads would put the mission in jeopardy. They found that the male soldiers would go out of their way to protect the female soldier, so much so that they put her safety above the mission. This also brought additional harm to the soldier and his squad.
/r/MGTOW31/01/16 10:51 PM
1

I switched it if off after a 3 seconds. I hope I didn't end up giving some idiot more views.
/r/MGTOW30/01/16 10:39 AM
14

The hoops he would have to jump through if she were the one laying on the couch sick. Yep, title checks out.
/r/MGTOW09/01/16 09:57 PM
11

That's because most of Reddit is BP and beta af.
/r/TheRedPill06/01/16 09:21 PM
5

I know it's a fictitious exchange, but this Professors mistake was entertaining the very first offense.
/r/MensRights01/01/16 10:10 PM
1

I don't think you need to pander to please the fans.
/r/MGTOW20/12/15 07:56 PM
6

Yep, pretty much. She's an excellent pilot, knows the ins-and-outs of anything technical or mechanical, has combat skills that rival that of the Republic's army (without a single day of training,) and is the fastest learner this side of the galaxy.
/r/MGTOW20/12/15 06:03 AM
6

In my haste to avoid all spoilers, I missed all the signs pointing to a politically correct, please everybody, safe movie. It's not very original. Most of the movie is fan service, and rehashing older plot points. It's mostly riding on the coattails of the OT and appealing to anyone that may have been left out from the other movies.
/r/MGTOW20/12/15 05:59 AM
1

No. It should not be illegal (in that case you listed.) It should be prohibited by the school systems. They should not have to go to jail, but rather get fired and possibly have that put on their employment records (this part can be debated.) Either way, it should be the business or organization that deals with these matters, not the courts. Unless they are under (say) 15 years old, and/or make a complaint they were abused.
/r/MensRights17/12/15 09:19 PM
1

First of all, that would most likely go against rule number one of every prison in the country. I doubt any prison in the land will let their guards have sex with the prisoners. For so many reasons, this is prohibited. Secondly, you're conflating the idea of two consenting mature people into scenarios where it may not be professionally or morally acceptable. Then you'll have to use common sense and follow the rule of that organization. Some office jobs forbid (grown adults) employee fraternizati…
/r/MensRights17/12/15 09:13 PM
1

Firstly, why is it vague? It is used for many other serious situations like murder, mental instability, & other high crimes. These aren't unqualified hacks with a one year online degree, we're talking about professionals here. The same ones that the courts assign to many different cases (eg. child custody hearings.) So if they are already deemed credible by the State and Federal Govt, then why not here? Secondly, we're not just talking girls. As we see weekly, there are boys involved too. And by…
/r/MensRights17/12/15 09:05 PM
4

Except, when it happened to Blacks in the past, was because of punishment and restriction of access. This happening now is more so as privilege and elitism. Imagine water fountains that were only for one gender...
/r/MensRights16/12/15 09:52 PM
5

Since most of the world, including each state in America, disagrees on the actual age of consent, perhaps that range (16-18yo) should be judged case by case, and any minors 15 or younger be treated as per existing laws. So if the "victim" in question is between the ages of 16 & 18, then a psyche evaluation should be conducted to determine whether that individual has the mental maturity to understand the ramifications of sexual intercourse. And since most people vary in maturity and mental aptitu…
/r/MensRights16/12/15 09:45 PM
12

At what age would you say you still thought a tank was an appropriate vehicle for every day travel? That could be a very vital factor to this topic. We can't really make blanketed statements about every person, when we know some folks are slower than others... maturing that is. One sixteen year old could be awkward and below average mentally, while another could be bright, mature, and socially ahead of most 18 year olds. So blanketed statements don't work when people vary so much from individual…
/r/MensRights16/12/15 09:35 PM
3

It didn't take me too long of alone thinking to figure out that the captain should have instructed all male passengers to meet up in the banquet hall and all women & children to follow the deckhands on their part of the ship to the life boats. While the women & children were evacuated, I'd have all the men and employees gather all the tables, chairs, etc to create make shift rafts. And by the predicted time the titanic would have gone under, all the passengers would have been off the ship. The e…
/r/MGTOW21/11/15 01:37 AM
5

What happened to pleading "No Contest?" It essentially works as an inbetween of guilty and not guilty. It lets you proceed with your sentencing as if you pleaded guilty, but none of the repercussions afterwards of that plea. Meaning it doesn't get used in future trials or cases as a guilty plea.
/r/MensRights10/11/15 11:20 PM
79

Text book example. She came out all high and mighty, then when she was called out for her bs she turned into a hair twirling, little school girl. Played that victim card superbly, while calling others racist.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/11/15 12:44 AM
2

No offense, but I wouldn't be listening to a lot of what a 45yo single woman is trying to impart about dating, aside from the obvious, which is what she specifically likes. Which ended up creating a shit storm out of nothing. She gave her like/dislikes and preferences on how she would like to be approached. Perfectly fine, yet many took it way too personally. On the other hand, she's 45 and still single, so there is a lot more going on there. But most importantly, I don't think any men should be…
/r/TheRedPill16/10/15 07:07 PM
1

Cheers, mate!
/r/MensRights15/10/15 10:34 PM
1

Looks like a direct link. Can someone tell me if it's a good (unbiased) read or will I be adding more traffic to another fluff piece?
/r/MensRights14/10/15 08:16 PM
0

I knew what this video was going to be before I clicked it. Classic!
/r/MensRights14/10/15 08:07 PM
5

This is the truest words in this whole thread. Most of it is smoke and mirrors. Very very few 9s & 10s. Majority wouldn't hold up to the expectations they've created once the clothes & makeup fall off.
/r/TheRedPill14/10/15 07:54 PM
1

/r/introvert or /r/MGTOW may be for you. It may come down to cost-benefit. Sometimes the effort put into socializing with strangers are not returning net gains. It could also be that in the current epoch, there are other forms of activities that produce higher levels of stimuli (eg. internet, gaming, porn, etc.) than interacting with strangers in person. Or it could just mean, you need to take a short break. You may be getting burnt out. Take a vacation from socializing, then return when you are…
/r/askTRP07/10/15 11:33 PM
3

There are many brilliant videos of his debates on youtube, but his appearance on the Joe Rogan Podcast was eye opening. Turns out the feminism issue is one of the few issues he makes any sense on. Check out his appearance on the JRE podcast. If nothing else, it's another entertaining episode.
/r/MensRights06/10/15 10:45 PM
6

Why go to the game if you're not going to watch it?
/r/MGTOW01/10/15 11:30 PM
12

Mmm. Hmmm. Very interesting. That's it? No rebuttal? I guess she made too much sense.
/r/MensRights28/09/15 08:53 PM
8

It's not going to be in the next couple years, but imagine how quickly technology has grown in the past. During one person's lifetime they saw the Wright Brothers take flight for the first time to the first astronauts breaching the earth's atmosphere with a space craft (and land on the moon.) In 15 minutes you could save 15% or more on car insurance search Youtube and find videos showing the latest advancements on prosthetics, A.I. that can answer deeper philosophical questions as well as adapt …
/r/MensRights18/09/15 11:19 PM
22

"So you think men are better than women?" "In some things, yes; and some things, no."
/r/MensRights18/09/15 10:55 PM
11

If android technology reaches that level, there may be legal president against taking one's likeness. Although, mixing and matching certain features and creating hybrids could be permitted.
/r/MGTOW16/09/15 09:09 PM
9

She fell back on to the tried and true tactics of lying about "abuse" and playing up the victim card. Apparently, laws were just an annoyance to her.
/r/MensRights10/08/15 07:35 PM
2

Jesus Christ. At that point, I'd rather be alone.
/r/TheRedPill22/07/15 09:23 PM
7

That is some despicable shit. She hasn't taken advantage of him completely yet. Like a black widow she's going after his last bit of self respect and financial independence. Then she'll discard him leaving behind a hollow shell, and continue playing the victim card. The cycle continues...
/r/TheRedPill22/07/15 04:52 PM
9

What Ms. Klausner means by "guys" is males who are not boys or men but something in between. I like how she's the arbitrator defining what a man is.
/r/MensRights22/07/15 04:48 PM
7

Thank Zeus on his mountain top for Youtube. Reality strikes again and again and shows us many examples to the contrary.
/r/MensRights19/07/15 01:59 AM
3

I'd describe everything that is happening with women today as similar to how countries transition from 2nd world to 1st world. Just as the industrial revolution brought the western world into a tier 1, so has the women's movement of the 60's lead to the state of affairs today. Women today make up greater percentage of the work force. They have much larger purchasing power, and they are acting much more liberated. What they are doing is somewhat similar to how men did after the industrial revolut…
/r/MensRights13/07/15 12:32 AM
1

That's high praise for her acting ability.
/r/TheRedPill13/07/15 12:06 AM
2

They're like a whirling dervish of misinformation.
/r/MensRights09/07/15 01:09 AM
2

Too much of that going on as it is. Too many things are considered harassment. Patience and common sense was the right tactic here. Violence would only give them more kindling for their hate.
/r/MensRights28/06/15 11:24 PM
19

"Scandinavian, muscular, attractive" = Okay. "Cute Asian, Yellow Fever" = Gross, except if it's just me.
/r/TheRedPill26/06/15 12:06 AM
9

Entitlement... meet crazy. Mix the two and you get wtf levels of the western world today.
/r/MGTOW25/06/15 12:28 AM
1

Thanks for the explanation.
/r/MensRights23/06/15 01:23 PM
2

I'm over simplifying here, but I think it has more to do with who the recipient is, than what the content is. Meaning, men have online heated shitfests a lot when one tells the other that they'll kill them in some outlandish way or bang their mom or rape their buttholes with some rather ingenuity means. The difference is, when it's said to other men, they reciprocate in kind or they understand it as hollow threats and move on. Whereas with many women online, they receive the same kind of threats…
/r/MensRights23/06/15 12:26 AM
1

Very good point. Both the Johns/Jons have a very obvious slant, and in Stewart's case, it wasn't so blatant until recently. He tried to spread his mockery on both sides, as much as he could in the past. It was no mystery that they're liberal, but at least they tried to stick to the facts in the past. Now, that they've put on their SJW hats, those facts are becoming a lot more muddied.
/r/MensRights23/06/15 12:17 AM
1

Wait, correct me if I'm wrong. Weiner sent those pics to another woman, then it appeared all over the news. Wasn't the other woman involved or did the media take it from his facebook/twitter account?
/r/MensRights23/06/15 12:11 AM
36

Jeesus, this episode was hard to watch. Kinda like the time he went on about the women's wage gap. Started to feel like the two actors in the blooper reel at the end. I was cracking up when I wasn't shaking my head.
/r/MensRights22/06/15 02:33 PM
9

Apparently, we should be very worried.
/r/MensRights10/06/15 10:51 PM
1

If these two movies are not for you, then I would stay away from /r/movies, b/c those two movies are raved about in that sub.
/r/MensRights10/06/15 10:05 PM
0

Believe me, I find those movies laughably bad. Which is why I avoid them. I'm just more annoyed by the constant whining from one side about how they don't have enough movies representing them. So be it. I'd prefer it if they did so not at the expense of men. P.s. We all know why the new Mad Max was like that. Because there is much more money to be made if you made both genders into heroes. You get two birds with one stone. Why make a movie with just a leading man. Make one with a leading woman t…
/r/MensRights10/06/15 10:02 PM
7

This is starting to become an epidemic. I'll wait patiently for feminism to address this heinous female teacher culture of rape. Any minute now...
/r/MensRights10/06/15 09:55 PM
2

I'm all for more women dominated movies, if it will just shut everyone up about it. But something tells me they will never stop.
/r/MensRights09/06/15 11:13 PM
5

I feel dirty giving that video more views.
/r/TheRedPill04/06/15 11:20 PM
1

This happens so much that I'm surprised there is no campaign against it. Oh wait, always the victim never the culprit. Nevermind.
/r/MensRights04/06/15 10:56 PM
12

Feminism isn't about equality; it's about establishing the Matriarchy. This should be on this sub's banner. It's brilliant!
/r/TheRedPill30/05/15 10:29 PM
1

Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned.
/r/MensRights26/05/15 09:17 PM
2

In which case wouldn't that constitute as sexism, then be brought to the Supreme Court?
/r/MensRights26/05/15 09:15 PM
2

If this law ever gets passed and is agreed upon to be gender neutral, then the unintended consequences is going to be something to behold.
/r/MensRights26/05/15 09:13 PM
6

Sadly, it's all around us. It's in our media, it's in our entertainment, it's in our daily lives. A parent can't be with their child 24/7. But you're right, good parenting is a way to combat these bad influences.
/r/MensRights20/05/15 12:08 AM
14

Except it won't be any of those girls flipping that bill. I'll be their fathers.
/r/MensRights19/05/15 11:27 PM
3

Nice, but truth is they want... everything. 99.9% of single women say they want [enter long laundry list here.] The has to be smart, but not too smart. He has to be funny, but her type of funny. He has to be confident, but not arrogant. He has to be good looking, but not look in the mirror. He has to have money... er, the more the better.
/r/MGTOW18/05/15 11:35 PM
0

This is the new era we live in. It's the new world of purchasing power. It's all profit driven and no studio is going to make movies about accuracy. They are going to cater to as big of a demo as they can reach in order to make the most money. For decades now, they were keeping it real, but that meant it alienated a lot of the female viewers. Though women/girls can still enjoy watching male protagonists, it's become a much more lucrative venture to have them relate to the story. Changing the plo…
/r/TheRedPill15/05/15 11:53 PM
2

I disagree. This may cause a lot of unwanted friction and unintended drama within the group. My advice would be to take the boyfriend aside and have a man to man talk with him. Let him know that it would be alright to have his gf around if you all were meeting for drinks or going out to eat, but her being at your astronomical society is just causing a disruption and bringing nothing to the table. Make it clear that it's not a personal attack on her or his being with her, but that she doesn't hel…
/r/TheRedPill15/05/15 11:41 PM
2

Interviewer: "... there's been an unlocking (if you like) of power that they believe men have held, and therefore there doesn't need to be any state prejudice in their favor. This is all about redressing the balance. This is what feminists are after..." Mike Buchanan: "You know, if we're going in for retributive justice, then we should be giving Black Americans (I guess) a White slave each." Interviewer: "..." (changes subject)
/r/MensRights14/05/15 11:20 PM
1

Good points. This also begs the question of who will be doing the reproducing? Will there be an equal amount of people opting out of technological lifestyles and try to hold on to the old way? Will the majority be plugged in and the continuation of the species be done inside petri dishes? We're embarking on a strange, sci fi-esque future. Most of it we cannot predict. But we all know that cell phones have become so wide spread that even the poorest of the poor around the globe has access to them…
/r/TheRedPill11/05/15 04:47 AM
4

That may be true, but there will also be a certain percentage of attractive men who have had it with the whole dating scene and opt for the pleasures of a fun night in as well. Even attractive men can find them a chore at times... and expensive... and time consuming... and high maintenance.
/r/TheRedPill09/05/15 11:46 PM
7

If I were to break down the logic of gaming, I would say it's about stimuli. The reason why a lot of people love surfing the internet and constantly login on to Reddit is because these activities stimulate our brain. The same can be said about gaming. Imagine your brain cells are firing on all cylinders because you are put in a scenario where you are having the adventure of your life, fighting off big baddies, and being in a team environment chatting it up with other friends through your headset…
/r/TheRedPill09/05/15 11:44 PM
1

And that right there is exactly why there is a MRM.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 11:36 PM
1

It sounds so sensible when we say it, doesn't it? It seems like the most logical and fair solution, yet you will be seen as a misogynist and a dead beat father (or encouraging dead beat behavior) by feminists.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 11:34 PM
2

Well put. Good points all around.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 01:13 AM
1

Though a horrible experience for you, I can't help but feel that more women need to see first hand what the other side deals with. Men are automatically seen as the "bad guy." And what you went through is a piece of cake compared to what your husband could have gone through had he have been in your situation. And that right there is why there is a MRM.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 12:46 AM
2

I don't have an answer for you. I wish I did. I think you perfectly summed up this whole Feminist vs MRA confusion you were wondering about. Take in what you just wrote for a second, and what you've read from many of the comments here. What you'll find is there are a lot of problems that both sides have to deal with. So my question to you is, why wouldn't there be an MRA for those rights that you have no answer for? You'll have to come to realize that while Feminism is well intended (most of the…
/r/MensRights07/05/15 12:36 AM
2

First of all, you'll get no argument from me on that. I'm all for a more sensible look at reforming reproductive rights to be fair for both sides. Secondly, I was just clarifying what the issue she was referring to. I mean I could be wrong, but that's the impression I got. Even though I agree with you, it will be very difficult for men to jocky for any leverage when women have enjoyed such a long history of having 100% rights when it came to decision making and opting out. It won't be something …
/r/MensRights07/05/15 12:17 AM
1

All the more reason to reformed those benefits. The world is changing, and with it society. Perhaps we need to update many laws to reflect the changing landscape.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 12:01 AM
1

Yes I do. It was birth from an old antiquated idea of family values. However, the costs of marriage with children end up outweighing those benefits.
/r/MensRights06/05/15 11:54 PM
1

I know there will be some items or property that cannot be equally divided. That's where the two sides would have to come to a compromise. Either (a.) one party will get the advantage when it comes to an item/property while having the disadvantage with another item/property, or (b.) whoever gets to keep said item/property will compensate the other party for the value that is owed them. It can be worked out. I mean, if you really think about it, what people should be doing is not entering into a …
/r/MensRights06/05/15 11:48 PM
2

I'm not arguing with you. I am well aware of the discrepancy between the two on reproductive rights, but what we have here is a case of apples & oranges. She's speaking of "reproductive rights" as it pertains to abortion and having that choice, while you are speaking about the rights of a father versus mother when it comes to making reproductive decisions.
/r/MensRights06/05/15 11:39 PM
5

I don't think she's talking about reproductive in that way. We all know that men get the short end of the stick when it comes to having any say. I believe she's referring to abortion and her right to choose. She's worried about the Red States where it's becoming increasingly difficult to make those choices. By the way, I'm all for her having that right. In fact, I encourage any form of sexual education or option to avoid unwanted pregnancies.
/r/MensRights05/05/15 11:44 PM
1

Well, seeing as it's mostly men who are victims of these laws, it falls under men's rights. Or at the very least, if you don't think this law itself isn't worth reforming, then it still falls under the umbrella of men's issues b/c it would at least be worth being educated on. Know what you are getting into and the consequences thereafter.
/r/MensRights05/05/15 11:15 PM
3

This should be a bumper sticker.
/r/MensRights05/05/15 11:10 PM
2

Why people decide to involve the government in their love life, I don't understand. If they want the whole ceremony and family there to witness their union, then just have a religious or nondenominational wedding. Don't sign any papers. Just let it be between you, him/her, and whatever god or spaghetti appendaged being you believe in. And imagine, if it didn't work out, then no drama. Just take whatever you came in with, and split any items that was purchased equally, and go about your merry way…
/r/MensRights05/05/15 11:09 PM
3

The sooner the better. Both parties have reasons to be upset here, Not really. If done soon enough and with tact, the guy will not be upset. Disappointed? Sure. Whereas, the woman in the situation has no right to be upset. She isn't owed his friendship. Furthermore, guys aren't looking for friendship with women. They get all those needs met by their guy friends. They're looking for sexual companionship. The sooner women who don't get this realize this, the sooner we can all get on with our lives…
/r/RedPillWomen04/05/15 11:36 PM
1

This is going to be one hell of an interesting social experiment. After Hillary undoubtedly wins in 2016, b/c men are usually divided between the Democratic & Republican vote, with the remaining piece of the pie going to a 3rd party. But it's usually the women vote that puts the candidate over the top. The growing number of female voters only adds to their sentiment that they want a female President now! They wanted very much for a woman in 2008, but the Obama factor won out. Now they don't care…
/r/MensRights04/05/15 11:14 PM
13

The hypocrisy of their thinking is that after they go on about how it's perfectly fine to have multiple sexual partners in college, they then feel the need to lie about those partners. Why lie if societal norms say it's alright? It's because they know it's not a quality to possess if they ultimately want to settle down with a good man.
/r/TheRedPill03/05/15 12:07 AM
1

I wonder if you have really good guy friends to compare with? If so, then you would know there are a lot of things you cannot talk to with women as you could with other men. If you do not, then you are missing out.
/r/TheRedPill02/05/15 12:34 AM
2

Why do we not hear about these people calling out the media for "benevolent sexism?" They don't think it's pandering making the guy always the doofus in commercials? How about in TV shows the guy always does something dumb; while she is always level headed, calm, and there to put him in his place. That's not benevolent sexism?
/r/MensRights28/04/15 11:28 PM
2

I don't care what anyone does, but just don't lie about it. If they want to go through a "hoe phase," then be honest and tell me so I can not waste my time on them. P.s. The very idea that they would go into denial about it, is their own admittance that it is undesirable for LTR.
/r/TheRedPill25/04/15 12:22 AM
5

Except that "L" shape. Those sexist horses!
/r/TheRedPill20/04/15 11:56 PM
7

You'd be surprised. Try bringing up controversial MR issues here on Reddit and you'll see how not rare those opinions are.
/r/MensRights16/04/15 12:24 AM
8

Probably not funny for those unfortunate guys. It's been said in the past that "every woman has her secrets," but it seems this new crop of girls will have a whole other level of secrets.
/r/MGTOW11/04/15 10:54 PM
2

Oh, yeah? So where do whores go?
/r/MensRights11/04/15 10:42 PM
30

A King woman who must keep saying he she is King superior, is no King not superior.
/r/MensRights10/04/15 11:03 PM
0

This may have been said before, but I'm going to make a prediction now -- It's going to be Barack Obama all over again, but this time instead of about Racism, it'll be 4 years (possibly 8 years) about Sexism. Your Fox News pundits will make it about her inability because she's a woman, and MSNBC/CNN will make it all about how hard she has it because she is a woman. It's all that will be talked about while she is in office, just as race is all America talks about since Obama got elected. This cou…
/r/MensRights10/04/15 10:59 PM
0

It's about time that a 3rd party candidate get some serious attention. (And more success than Ross Perot.) I think the country is ready to get out of this 2 party duopoly.
/r/MensRights10/04/15 10:48 PM
1

Agree completely, but that's not what Scimitar66 is saying. Unless I'm wrong, he's making it seem like porn actresses have figured out their sexuality and so all women should if they want to be more evolved (paraphrasing the intent of his point.)
/r/TheRedPill10/04/15 10:05 PM
6

Yet the Porn Actress is not the ideal either. We've had multiple posts and articles on the issue of women with higher sexual partner count correlates with high divorce rates. The history and the human psychology of pair bonding. Porn actresses may be liberated, but it comes at a cost. This is why porn, MGTOWs, and marriage rates dropping may be a lesson to the general female population that things need to change. Personally, I think things will get much worse before it gets better.
/r/TheRedPill09/04/15 11:47 PM
3

Good on the judge.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/04/15 10:59 PM
43

I'm inclined to believe that's more the Reddit architecture in work than a diagnosis of that subreddit. Meaning, when a post is created with a clear position taken on a subject, then the bulk of the comments will be from those who support said position. It's the same with /r/movies or any other sub. You can make a post on why you hated movie A and the threads within will be majority anti that movie. Turn around and create another post praising the same movie (A,) and the results will be reflecte…
/r/TheRedPill06/04/15 10:08 PM
1

Society SAYS men are less valuable than women. I disagree. I agree with your disagreement. If anything, you could kill off half the population of women and most civilizations would continue to function. The same can not be said if you did the same of men.
/r/TheRedPill01/04/15 11:46 PM
7

It didn't occur to her that that concept of "holding you up for forever" (that she finds ridiculous for her to do) is something men have been doing and are constantly asked to do. Until she can grasp that, she'll miss his point completely.
/r/TheRedPill01/04/15 11:42 PM
5

Is this another way of saying, "I gave up on trying to stay slim?"
/r/MensRights31/03/15 11:14 PM
5

Society. It keeps drilling into men that they need to get married or else their lives won't have any meaning... and "you don't want to be some pervy creeper, do you? Better put a ring on it then."
/r/MensRights24/03/15 10:32 PM
2

Except no man nor the media give two shakes about Nov. 19th.
/r/MensRights24/03/15 10:29 PM
6

Except a lot of women like the pat on the head and their drawings on the refrigerator. Don't believe me? Try organizing a movement to get rid of International Women's Day and see how far that gets ya.
/r/MensRights24/03/15 10:26 PM
6

I'm not taking any sides in this argument, but merely commenting to clarify that that image was doctored to make Richard Dawkins look more like Emma Watson.
/r/TheRedPill24/03/15 12:36 AM
3

Truth: You're not really paying $8000 for a lunch box diamond ring. You're buying a temporary ticket to ride the pussy roller coaster. That is until she decides to revoke those privileges later.
/r/MGTOW20/03/15 09:47 PM
8

The sad truth about all this is -- most men's ultimate goal is to settle down and start a family. The "best buds," "boys will be boys" days are (usually) limited to the bachelor years. Society has groomed into all of us that to be complete you have to get a stable job, then find a mate, then have children, then prepare for retirement, and share your wisdom to perpetuate this cycle with your grandchildren. Most Blue Pill men will follow this path, even though they know something is missing in the…
/r/TheRedPill15/03/15 11:58 PM
1

But there is no denying that ObamaCare (and RomneyCare etc.) subsidizes women at the expense of men. I don't think that will change anytime soon. Women will always be the "protected" gender. The only way that changes is if they sabotage that themselves.
/r/TheRedPill12/03/15 10:58 PM
1

Don't be fooled. ObamaCare is RomneyCare (and a buffed up version of DoleCare.) And after much backlash from the insurance companies and Republican outcry of socialism, they had to pull back from the Public Option and adopt a previous Republican plan (with some additions.) So before we say "thanks Obama," realize that politicians are politicians. It's better to not fall into one side over another. Pay attention to their actions and not their rhetoric.
/r/TheRedPill12/03/15 12:07 AM
9

The message the ex-wife and her lawyer are basically sending is "you should never have gotten married, b/c she has claim to your money for the rest of your life now."
/r/PussyPass11/03/15 11:42 PM
41

In an interview he said that it would be out of character for Han.
/r/TheRedPill11/03/15 11:07 PM
-7

This has nothing to do with their religion. They just seem like a bunch of "mean girls" hoodrat types that went into furious harpy mode and mob mentality. No real context here of what happened prior to the scuffle. Plus The DM isn't really a reliable source for facts. P.s. That guy can't fight to save his girlfriend's life.
/r/PussyPass04/03/15 01:09 AM
15

Most do.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/02/15 11:43 PM
1

Here's the thing. It ultimately comes down to who you really are. We are going to find out or have suspicions about it one way or another. Whether you have sex on the first date or hold off for a distinct period of time, is just one part of the equation. The other part is what your sexual and relationship history is. One input is useless without the other.
/r/TheRedPill13/02/15 01:04 AM
1

Sounds like you're still in that idealism stage. Which is a good thing, but you have to be even more observant and aware. I get the impression you're not into casual sex. That means you have to be smart about who you choose to date. Look for the signs. Read between the lines. Ask questions that lets you learn multiple things about them. Then proceed with caution. Sounds like common sense, but it's not as common as one would think.
/r/TheRedPill12/02/15 01:23 AM
-1

It really depends on your own level of comfortability. For me personally, I'd excuse half of my number. It took much more skill and much more constraint when saying "no." Women have much more power in this regard. Her number should not be anywhere near yours.
/r/TheRedPill12/02/15 01:17 AM
1

I don't know if I'd put such a high credential as journalism to such low grade blogging.
/r/MGTOW12/02/15 01:01 AM
1

...a good example for this is “Interview with the vampire”. Yes, this is another fun choice. Not only do you get to see Brad Pitt and Tom Cruise act their corniest, Missing the point completely about the film. Plus it's still one of the best Vampire movies to date. He could have easily gone with it's counterpart, the all too obvious, Twilight.
/r/MGTOW12/02/15 12:59 AM
2

Exactly. Forever Alones are usually described as individuals who want to be in a relationship, but can't find the way or don't have the ability to get into one. MGTOW's are often men who have the ability, but made the conscious decision to opt out.
/r/TheRedPill11/02/15 12:09 AM
4

... and say the secret is ALWAYS letting your wife get her way I wonder if it ever occurs to women that this is basically translated as, "women are emotionally out of control and mentally a wreck, so in order to navigate that mine field, smart men should try and placate them at all times.
/r/MensRights10/02/15 11:56 PM
2

Very good point. It's no mystery why The Kardashians are so rich and so popular. It's because the bulk of their audience is women. They watch that garbage because a fraction of their own self is very much like one of the Kardashians. It's empty calorie entertainment to appease the empty calorie individuals who most men have absolutely not time or interest for.
/r/TheRedPill10/02/15 11:41 PM
1

For Screenshots, you click the "print screen" button on your keyboard and copy/paste it on a paint program, save file, and upload it to imgur (or equivalent image hosting site.) Then use that direct link instead of website url in your Reddit post. For Archiving, you can use either http://archive.today/ or http://archive.org/web/ . That way you aren't giving those sites more page views.
/r/MensRights07/02/15 12:17 AM
2

Saw "Huffingtonpost.com" and didn't click. A screencap of the webpage would be much appreciated or archive link.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 02:44 AM
2

I'm guessing OP does have a little hint of beta in him, as well. I mean he's sitting around taking all this verbal abuse from these hamsters and doesn't say anything like the other betas around him.
/r/TheRedPill31/01/15 10:53 PM
3

The whole Nicki Minaj situation you illustrated is the old "you made your bed now lay in it" and "have my cake and eat it too." Women who conduct themselves in promiscuous behavior don't like being called out for it. Even they feel dirty when the mirror is brought in front of them. So in this case, the gay interviewer is interested in the persona that the interviewee has created for herself, but the interviewee doesn't like that people see her for the person she has been portraying herself to be…
/r/TheRedPill30/01/15 11:36 PM
2

Glad to see I wasn't the only one. She was very keen with her word choices. Reread what she wrote fellas. P.s. She can also find useful info at r/RedPillWomen.
/r/TheRedPill30/01/15 12:42 AM
1

Why? OP is a woman. It's not necessary. If anything she should try - r/RedPillWomen
/r/TheRedPill30/01/15 12:41 AM
4

Absolutely spot on with the coffee! Why the coffee date over drinks because you see each other in the day light, you get to have indepth conversations instead of being in a noisy bar, and there's less of a concern about parting ways. No one in their right mind should be oppose to meeting at a cafe. Unless they are obviously trying to get a free meal. And in that case, you can filter them out before even meeting them.
/r/MGTOW28/01/15 11:15 PM
6

She learned a valuable lesson that day.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/01/15 11:23 PM
6

She's been invited to speak on many campuses. She was also on Colbert Report, being the only guest in the show's history that they disabled any youtube comments. I also agree with you that the only reason I know anything about her or hear anything about her is on Reddit. But that could also mean that even though she's not on our radar, she is still in the media sphere.
/r/MensRights25/01/15 10:58 PM
26

Because their voices are getting louder, and they are being heard by the industry and the media.
/r/MensRights25/01/15 10:19 PM
22

Because the perception has always been that - when a man drinks he becomes a monster; when a woman drinks she becomes his prey. P.s. I'm not saying I endorse that sentiment.
/r/MensRights21/01/15 05:16 PM
2

Firstly, thanks for being a part of r/MR. You are always welcome here. Secondly, I'm glad you get to see the other side of the equation. And hopefully it's made you a more balanced person because of it.
/r/MensRights16/01/15 11:12 PM
1

I picture it as one feminist is beating someone on the sidewalk while another feminist is holding a sign next to her screaming in the opposite direction at concerned lookers saying "not all Feminists are bad."
/r/MensRights16/01/15 11:06 PM
1

I think I understand what you're getting at and the overall logic as to why the laws are as such. I'd just like to interject that by case by case I mean the courts would employ an unbiased and qualified psychologist to examine the victim. Then determine if he or she is mature enough. Would be a good idea to do the same with the alleged perpetrator. This would also determine if the victim does in fact need to be protected. Also, going from 17 to 18 doesn't automatically make them mature. Hence, t…
/r/PussyPass15/01/15 03:43 AM
1

We're not talking about 4 year olds. Many nations in the world figured 16yo was old enough to drink or drive or fight wars. 17 is possible for a person to understand the ramifications of sex. Could there be 17yos that don't fully grasp the consequences of sex and the mental/emotional burdens of it, of course. There are plenty of 17yos out there that definitely couldn't handle it. But that just brings me back to "case by case" basis. Figure out if the individual in question has the mental faculti…
/r/PussyPass15/01/15 02:52 AM
1

Once again, I forget I'm on Reddit and I have to cross all the T's and dot all the I's or else many Redditors won't get the broad strokes of the point. I was implying they were mature 17yos. I guess I should have added, they didn't have multiple gfs at once, they had multiple relationships by then, they were responsible, some had jobs, many were good students, etc etc.
/r/PussyPass15/01/15 02:38 AM
1

They didn't just grow a beard. Hahaha. I forget sometimes I'm on Reddit and I have to spell everything out. I thought you got the jest of it. I was implying they were mature 17yos.
/r/PussyPass15/01/15 02:35 AM
4

Once again I've got to interject that these situations have to be judged case by case. It should be based on the individual's (victim) maturity. When in high school I knew 17 year olds who could grow a beard and had multiple girlfriends, at the same time, there also were 17yos who couldn't grow a pube and broke down in the presence of a woman or girl. The problem with laws like this is that it basically sets an arbitrary rule blanketed on everyone. Forgetting that some people mature faster than …
/r/PussyPass13/01/15 11:12 PM
2

Nah. This sub is pretty entertaining. I'd suggest not to follow the hive mind and think for yourself.
/r/PussyPass13/01/15 10:52 PM
43

I hate to say it, but this is much ado about nothing. And no, this is not like a guy rubbing his junk in public. This is as harmless as a girl sitting on top of a washing machine. If anything the police could have just said "this is inappropriate" and for the crew to stop filming at a public beach, but not needed. Truth be told all the women are clothed, they're not using their hands in a lude gesture, and there is no actual penetration. I'd say this is between harmless and mildly inappropriate …
/r/PussyPass13/01/15 01:06 AM
10

I'm gonna go ahead say it... you can do whatever you want. Yes. That means whatever. You can spend more time on the interests and hobbies you've had or pick up new ones. You can spend the time investing in your future (career advancement, savings, etc.) You can take this time to focus on your health. Or you can do none of those things. It's completely up to you. Plus, this doesn't mean that you have to completely give up on women. You can either decide to date casually or still keep an eye open …
/r/MGTOW04/01/15 12:22 AM
3

It's completely okay for you to post here. In fact, constructive discussion and debates are welcomed. Even if what you have to say is controversial, it's fine. Of course you'll have to deal with the downvotes in those cases, but you won't be banned. Or at least you shouldn't be banned. So feel free to be as active here as you'd like.
/r/MensRights04/01/15 12:13 AM
14

I don't think I'd blame Feminism for this one. I think it's is more or less a White Knight problem. The laws were created long ago (before the 60's) because it was the only way to even out the risks women took during those days. During that period, women held no position of power, they weren't the breadwinners, and their only position in society was caretakers. So in order to balance some of the power they were lacking, they did so through the courts. Fast forward to present day women are in the…
/r/PussyPass02/01/15 11:08 PM
18

Wow, how quickly she threw her recent ex under the bus. Taking responsibility for her own actions probably never crossed her mind.
/r/PussyPassDenied31/12/14 10:36 PM
-4

I want to upvote this post so much. It's an uplifting and positive story, but the source is DailyMail. So, I'm not sure if all or any of it is fabricated. It's just not a trusty or reputable site.
/r/MensRights30/12/14 11:30 PM
4

Caveat: I applaud Norah Vincent and any other woman who wants to take serious steps in a man's shoe. I think it may help them to better understand and perhaps even through a sympathetic point of view they'll shed some of their negative stereotypes they have for men. In all honestly, she'll never truly understand what it is to be a man because... (spoiler alert) she's not a man. Her experiment was still at the end of the day seen through the lens of a woman in disguise. Her conclusions and lesson…
/r/TheRedPill30/12/14 12:54 AM
1

Men are more awesome. Come on! We can debate every little detail about this, but it ultimately comes down to evolution and our need to survive. We are awesome b/c we had to be. Now we are awesome b/c we can't help it... it's part of our DNA.
/r/MensRights22/12/14 12:56 AM
7

I'm never surprised by women anymore. Used to be a mystery, but once you start to figure out the patterns in their words & behavior, then it starts to fall into place. Also, Reddit's ASK-So-&-So posts (subject: women) usually never cease to entertain with their complete & utter WTF. Case in point - http://redditlog.com/snapshots/1399393 This comment perfectly responds to the rest of the comments there... and this one.
/r/TheRedPill21/12/14 01:59 AM
5

At least, that was our year according to the minds of the whiny, brittle men who genuinely believe “misandry” – the institutionalized hatred of men – is a powerful force in the world. Here in reality, misandry had a big year, too, but it looked a little different. For us, it was a tool to help create a less oppressive future. By her own admission, being prejudice and sexist is fine and a helpful tool for their cause.
/r/MensRights18/12/14 02:38 AM
16

From my end: I see only two options I'd give her... Go... but that means we're done. Don't go... that means you value our relationship. End of story. I'm not going to force any decision. That's her two choices.
/r/TheRedPill18/12/14 02:22 AM
8

Only the super sluts work that way. Most of the average chicks cheat with a purpose or person in mind. Jordan Axani already made a good impression on her through their skype sessions. Enough for her to imagine being intimate with him. Whatever she says to her family, friends, or media doesn't change that she's attracted to this guy and she's definitely considering the possibility of hooking up with him. Barring any unforeseen events that dampen the mood, she seems like she's down with it.
/r/TheRedPill18/12/14 02:15 AM
6

My interpretation of that is -- she's totally sort of like fine with them hooking up, but he better not fuck it up by being creepy b/c that ass is already green lit for him.
/r/TheRedPill18/12/14 02:05 AM
7

I'd suggest next time to relocate what you put in the title in to the comment section instead, and leave the title to something that actually describes the content.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/12/14 01:15 AM
2

Right there with ya, brother. I did the whole exercise, dress the part, and threw on the charm; but what they don't realize is it gets old after a while. And all that effort/$/time just doesn't seem to be worth the fleeting moments and sour after-taste. Most women in the dating pool aren't on the same level of fulfillment as your boys. I feel better about myself, about how I don't have to pretend to be the perfect guy for her, or fork endless amounts of cash in order to please them. Bros don't n…
/r/TheRedPill08/12/14 12:49 AM
5

Solution: Send little boy with 79cents and a little girl with $1 and see if they'll turn down a child and treat the two differently.
/r/MensRights05/12/14 12:53 AM
4

There is an art to letting someone down easy. No one wants to be told they are not attractive. I think you handled it alright. Sadly or fortunately, the more you have these interactions the more you'll become a zen ninja at breaking things off.
/r/MGTOW21/11/14 11:24 PM
-1

I don't think we do. MRA's have been pretty good at picking our battles. Some of this silliness doesn't require a retort. Especially responding to a shirt that says they'll bath in our tears. Sadly, we couldn't give a rat's ass (or tears) for their immaturity. That's one of the best parts about being a guy. We don't get overly emotional, and we are logical beings... generally speaking.
/r/MensRights18/11/14 01:51 AM
25

Any ideas on how to fuck with her? Asking the wrong questions. Basically, if she's lied to you about not liking porn, then you may wonder if she's lying to you about not wanting to get pregnant.
/r/TheRedPill16/11/14 01:19 AM
0

But you failed to mention that women are the main critics of what other women wear. Women care about what they wear (in general) at greater degrees and in higher percentage of the whole than men. That's why there are magazines and TV shows catering to this. The only reason it's spilled over to politics is because how much politics has become mainstream. Male journalists cover it because there is a female audience for it. I won't deny there isn't a negative element to it as well. Especially when …
/r/MensRights16/11/14 01:09 AM
1

Looks like a normal comic book shirt. Something you could pick up at Comic Con... ^<sup>once</sup> ^<sup>upon</sup> ^<sup>a</sup> ^<sup>time.</sup>
/r/MensRights16/11/14 12:53 AM
1

Agreed. You'd get more views & likes if the video wasn't just a voice and a single image. Some graphs and charts when facts are brought up, some clips of relative video to the subject discussed, and/or clever visual aides. It would be nice to have a concise, visually appealing video to go with the audio. Plus, it would be best to have an edited & polished script to read. And don't forget to drink a nice cup of coffee and make the video during the day and not late at night when you may be more ti…
/r/MGTOW15/11/14 01:08 AM
12

Or that "Equality" gif of the guy body slamming the girl punching the back of his head.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/11/14 11:56 PM
54

Instead of making more rules on sexual assault, I'd prefer we go the other direction and scale back the bloat and have more intelligent laws.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/11/14 02:35 AM
11

I love the way Murray sugar coated his stance. He deflects Stern's questions by pointing the finger inwards. Take note anyone who is looking for the perfect reply to this very question. He doesn't reveal how he feels about other people, instead explains his MGTOW ways on self improvement. Well done, Mr. Murray. Well done.
/r/MGTOW08/11/14 01:03 AM
1

Also, stop linking directly to their websites whenever possible. I wish MODs would make it a policy or users would on their own create screenshots and post the imgur link rather than direct site links. P.s. Wasn't there a Reddit BOT that did that? I'm pretty sure there is one, but I only see it on a few subs.
/r/MensRights05/11/14 10:47 PM
2

Apparently, only the edited version is on the Colbert Nation site (and aired on TV.) It's a very castrated version. Ripe with "woh is me. I'm such a victim," "all male gamers are bad," and "the gaming industry as a whole is bad."
/r/MensRights03/11/14 11:32 PM
91

Yep. Pretty much describes 2014 Feminism.
/r/MensRights03/11/14 11:18 PM
1

No offense, but didn't you link to the video as well?
/r/MGTOW03/11/14 10:40 PM
3

Nope, this article is not sarcastic. And these women aren't the only ones with this opinion. Here are more examples during a segement on On Point with Tom Ashbrook on NPR.
/r/MensRights03/11/14 10:26 PM
2

You can't dump someone just because they looked at another person. That would be hypocritical. Guys look at girls b/c it's in our biology. That mentality is thinking on their illogical level. As if looking at another human being is equivalent to cheating or something. If anything, I'd point out how silly she looked for staring as hard as she did. I may even put this in the "get out of jail free" column if I were that guy. Anytime she'd bring up whether I was checking out some other girl, I'd tel…
/r/TheRedPill31/10/14 11:10 PM
0

I think there is a larger issue here. You're right, he isn't some super specimen. What he did can be achieved with exercise, hair products, and tight fitting clothes. What is most notable is how most of the guys around him don't feel the need to put on the peacock show. However, the opposite is true for women in general. Their entire daily regiment is a whole peacock extravaganza. This can be further demonstrated by the women we know that don't go to these lengths and prefer to "dress down." The…
/r/TheRedPill31/10/14 11:04 PM
1

Patriarchy is such an evil thing, yet what would they do if all men suddenly lost their libido?
/r/TheRedPill31/10/14 10:51 PM
1

You're expecting logic from someone who has forsaken it long ago.
/r/TheRedPill31/10/14 10:48 PM
2

It's that little bit of subtle nuance in what she said that I don't think even she noticed. She plainly admitted to her own limitations and poor conscious choices. The rub came when she tried to turn it into "empowerment."
/r/TheRedPill31/10/14 10:45 PM
1

I'm torn here. I have opinions that fit both sides. I can only say that I skew based on each individual situation, factoring in who was specifically involved. In some cases, the woman is the predator (especially in cases where the boy is prepubescent) and must be dealt accordingly. In other circumstances the male is mature enough and/or not the prey (and thus the feelings of the comments in the post.) Allegations of rape is a serious thing, and must be judged on the nuances from case to case. Ju…
/r/MensRights30/10/14 11:09 PM
1

Life has taught me that looking for so much more is going to either be a chore or you're going to be waiting for quite a while. I've also learned that women are different from country to country. Each society affects many aspects of this. For instance, if you go to Russia, you'll come to learn that there are more women than men of middle to upper class. So the women compete more for eligible men. This compels them to look after their appearance, be more accepting, and try to bring more to the ta…
/r/RedPillWomen16/10/14 06:34 PM
0

That goes against everything in their nature. I'm not saying it would never happen. It just wouldn't be a majority occurrence.
/r/RedPillWomen11/10/14 04:12 PM
1

I was just about to mention that you linked directly to their site. Which will only benefit their page views further.
/r/MGTOW10/10/14 02:22 AM
1

Not pining, but thanks for adding to the discussion. And just blindly spewing "an ideal that will never become reality" is also pretty sad. I think an argument can be made that societal behaviors can indeed shift if and when a collective changes what it deems acceptable or not. For instance, it may have once upon a time been socially acceptable to hit your wife. The world is changing, and women's roles are shifting (despite it's detriment to the family dynamic.) This has and will continue to tak…
/r/RedPillWomen10/10/14 02:04 AM
28

It's sad the amount of things a guy has to do to attract a woman, while all a woman has to do is look decent and don't be a bitch.
/r/RedPillWomen10/10/14 01:42 AM
30

The pussy privilege is strong with this one. "If they told you you couldn't do something, it's their plane, you have to follow it." "No I don't!"
/r/PussyPass21/09/14 10:05 PM
0

Yeah, I have to disagree here as well. Do you remember Jodie Foster coming to the aid of Mel Gibson when most of Hollywood shun him, even though it might have reflected negatively on her? I'm not saying there aren't women out there as you described, but there are also many women out there that would be loyal to the men in their life. My personal guess would be whether or not there is a bond there or not. If she won't back you up, then there is no true bond there.
/r/TheRedPill18/09/14 02:23 PM
2

Not to mention, they don't have any game. They never needed it, even though they wouldn't really need it. Just be yourself and say "hi."
/r/MensRights17/09/14 01:07 AM
1

TRP is the harsh truth that people don't want to admit is true. Most moderate MRAs and non MRAs want to bash TRP, but all of it comes down to human psychology, biology, and years of evolutionary behaviors in grained in us. Generally, speaking of course.
/r/MensRights17/09/14 01:04 AM
4

It doesn't get lonely if... a.) you're not void of something you are longing b.) have enough hobbies or interests that you'd rather be doing than dealing with the dramas or relationships c.) you are not dependent on someone else for entertainment or feeling of worth d.) you have enough friends that fulfill your mental and cerebral needs I'd say, MGTOW isn't for guys who haven't had enough experience with dating, relationships, or sex. It ought not be for guys who haven't had a chance to experien…
/r/MGTOW15/09/14 02:38 AM
1

Shit. I've been doing it wrong the whole time. I say each of the letters. Secretly, I prefer M-G-T-O-W.
/r/MGTOW15/09/14 02:26 AM
4

Could be because your RP game is strong.
/r/TheRedPill15/09/14 01:41 AM
1

All good advice here. Read and take heed. I'll just add since you hinted that you're still fairly young, to consider whether or not you are interested in women. If you still desire sex and get those urges, then you should take what TRP teaches and apply them. Because it works. Once you've had the opportunity to utilize the RP techniques with your growth and sex life, then when you reach late 20s or 30s you can decide whether you want to continue, settle down, or GYOW.
/r/MGTOW15/09/14 12:47 AM
1

Agreed. It would have been better/hilarious if he put her in a sleeper hold and whispered in her ear, "shhhh... no talk... just dreams."
/r/MGTOW15/09/14 12:40 AM
11

I don't think girls on GW are necessarily easy to fuck. I'm sure there are some on there that are, but being an exhibitionist goes much deeper. You'd have to break down the desire of a woman to want to "show off" her goods. For instance, if they have pretty pussies, they'll want to show it off. NAWALT, but if they know their snatch is not as nice as some of the others, then they'll definitely be self conscience of it. Same goes for breasts and their entire body. It comes down to validation. They…
/r/TheRedPill15/09/14 12:31 AM
1

Exactly what I was thinking. I would have preferred he said, "I came over because I wanted to get to know you better, but it turns out you're either very superficial or have no problems cheating on this boyfriend you're waiting for."
/r/TheRedPill15/09/14 12:18 AM
0

Oh, that! Seriously, how often does that actually happen? Certainly next to never in America. Doesn't fit the AWALT mentality. What would they get out of a prank like that? I've heard of toning things down, then ratcheting up the make-up, LBD, & heels to turn on their charms, but the "I'll walk around and let everyone think I'm ugly" is a new one to me.
/r/TheRedPill15/09/14 12:14 AM
2

It was all good till the end, "I don't do the boyfriend thing." I feel like that statement did less "gotcha" and more softened the point by reaffirming to her that he wasn't going to be serious anyway... so no loss.
/r/TheRedPill13/09/14 11:53 PM
2

People are stupid with this shit, if I was talking to a girl that I thought she was ugly I wouldn't give her much attention. If I found out she was actually hot I would try to fuck her. a.) Guys don't (generally) change their minds because of the gals' status change. b.) Guys can grow to like someone, as long as they were somewhat physically attractive to begin with. Basically, if there was at least a foundation to build upon, then learning positive traits about them can heighten their level. c.…
/r/TheRedPill13/09/14 11:47 PM
8

I think Lucy Liu falls in that "beauty is in the eye of the beholder" category. Ask your Asian friends and most of them probably won't find her appealing. I think it has to do with her having extreme ethnic features. It's something they are used to, whereas, non Asians see it as more exotic and thus appealing. Personally, 3-4/10 is way too low in my own personal opinion. I find her very attractive. In the 7-8 range.
/r/TheRedPill13/09/14 11:35 PM
4

This is too politically influenced for me. I'm neither too Conservative nor overtly Liberal. I sway back and forth, depending on the issue. However this article is too biased and heavy in cherry picked data.
/r/TheRedPill13/09/14 11:26 PM
1

I have to agree. I was in a somewhat similar situation and I had to break it off early, so as to not waste either of our time. I hope she found someone who also wants what she wanted.
/r/TheRedPill13/09/14 01:16 AM
1

All the 2XC hamstering and Feminism as a whole has been lying to women. They are fed unrealistic advice that don't apply in the real world relationships. Their egos would have been pumped up so much that they'll be dumbfounded when they find themselves in their mid 30s and back to square one.
/r/TheRedPill13/09/14 01:08 AM
1

I feel bad for the next poor schmuck who thinks she's into him, not knowing that she's more into having a kid and the idea of him.
/r/TheRedPill13/09/14 12:59 AM
1

You are welcome here! You make a lot of good points. One in particular that jumped out at me -- the Ray Rice elevator incident. You are probably one of the very few people who has the guts to point out that he put distance between them and she tried to get back in his face. As a guy, we will immediately be seen as a misogynist if we point it out. So it's refreshing to see it come from a woman. We all know, what he did was awful, but both of their behaviors suggest this was probably not their fir…
/r/MensRights13/09/14 12:41 AM
3

In regards to those wives or girlfriends who had a surprise pregnancy, I wonder how many of them fall under the "don't stick your dick in crazy..." and how many of them would sabotage their man's birth control in order to get that "surprise pregnancy?"
/r/TheRedPill11/09/14 01:20 AM
0

Is there a better source than the daily mail?
/r/MensRights11/09/14 01:14 AM
1

The article is so ridiculous, it feels like a troll.
/r/MensRights11/09/14 01:10 AM
3

Wow! Just wow. This is the absolute best (non judicial/financial) advice I've read.
/r/MensRights23/08/14 10:02 PM
1

"Hell Hath No Fury Like a Woman Scorned."
/r/MensRights23/08/14 09:53 PM
3

I don't say I'm an MRA because that's no better than being a Feminist. I don't associate myself in any one group to be more neutral and objective. Both Men & Women can be wronged and the "right" or "just" thing to do is to come to the aid of whomever, no matter the gender.
/r/MensRights22/07/14 04:27 AM
2

Article. Even if it was in self defense, it’d do nothing positive for him in the face of authority. It’s sickening to realize that in order for this guy to have the woman get arrested, he had to have been videotaping it, instead of getting her the hell off of him. Things aren’t right when we’re a society of people who feel like we need to record something to secure ourselves, instead of defending ourselves.
/r/MensRights09/06/14 06:58 AM
2

And they wonder why MGTOW exists.
/r/MensRights06/06/14 03:07 AM
1

They broke rule #2.
/r/MensRights17/05/14 11:19 PM
1

You make an interesting point. Usually the cameraman can use the excuse of trying to capture video proof of the incident. ^<sup>Unless</sup> ^<sup>the</sup> ^<sup>subjects</sup> ^<sup>are</sup> ^<sup>the</sup> ^<sup>cops.</sup>
/r/MensRights08/05/14 12:22 AM
2

Men are evil masterminds and bumbling oafs. Kinda like Obama is a Muslim who attends a church with an America hating Pastor. The mind, it hurts.
/r/MensRights05/04/14 01:00 AM
4

A child also doesn't deserve to be raised by parents who dislike one another and argue over said child for the rest of it's pre-adult life.
/r/MensRights10/03/14 12:28 AM
20

41 year old Black woman sentenced... A 41 yo White woman would have just gotten a slap on the wrist. "African American (Black) women are three times more likely than white women to be incarcerated." Source 1 Source 2 Source 3
/r/MensRights03/03/14 12:09 AM
2

I think having that sensible discussion prior to the check's arrival would be prudent. My suggestion is to voice your opinion on the matter and get his. Agree to paying half for the first few dates, then when things come further into focus (regarding whether there is a future with each other,) then you can have alternating opportunities where either of you pays.
/r/MensRights22/02/14 01:28 AM
4

WOW! This kid is going to be real fun at parties.
/r/MensRights13/01/14 06:36 PM
3

Mansplaining is breaking the code of "woman talk" which isn't based on definitions of words as they are in the English dictionary. n. Woman Talk: The art of using words with multiple meaning and hidden messages that say one thing, but come layered with added implications. v. Mansplaining: To explain oneself, express one's thoughts in a language understood by men. Usually common spoken English.
/r/MensRights13/01/14 06:35 PM
-7

The Feminist Reply: "Because men are pigs and they make a mess, while women are sugar and spice and everything nice."
/r/MensRights08/01/14 04:30 PM
2

I'm all for this. They should give her her own TV show in the most watched prime time slot. Sunlight being the best disinfectant and all that jazz.
/r/MensRights31/12/13 02:46 AM
1

Pretty much.
/r/MensRights31/12/13 02:37 AM
2

This is akin to cutting off a man's penis and throwing it out of a moving car. Imagine the very idea of this being pitched for a storyline having the gender reversed? It wouldn't because it's sexist and degrading.
/r/MensRights23/12/13 12:57 AM
1

Bottomline: Feminists want all the benefits of a lesser being, while fighting tooth & nail against that label.
/r/MensRights22/12/13 01:59 AM
2

Not clicking on post because it could be a link to her video... and that is definitely not worth my attention (or traffic.)
/r/MensRights21/12/13 02:46 AM
2

The beauty of the internet (esp. Youtube) is that it has shown us a bigger picture.
/r/MensRights10/12/13 02:21 AM
1

I HAVE A GREAT IDEA! Why don't we have a council of Feminists & MRAs meet with their Parliament/Congressional representatives and list all the inequalities that both sides have to deal with, then agree on writing a bill that would do away with all of those gender bias inequalities. For example, all the pay gap issues they feel women have to deal with and all the court related prejudices that men have to deal with. Surprisingly we'd find that it is illegal already for anyone to be discriminated a…
/r/MensRights27/11/13 03:39 AM
3

Not taking responsibility for themselves? I'm shocked.
/r/MensRights27/11/13 03:22 AM
1

Seems like the justice system hasn't caught up to the new technological advanced times. The world is changing and the people are not controllable, but the laws are still totalitarian.
/r/MensRights16/11/13 02:57 AM
1

I don't even know where to begin to address the idiocy of the claim she is trying to present. It's almost as if she doesn't understand or chooses not to acknowledge the many factors why the pool of candidates who run for political office and the incumbents are as they are. Her faulty examples are hardly representative of men as a whole. It blows my mind that people actually read her drivel.
/r/MensRights16/11/13 02:38 AM
-1

Excellent points.
/r/MensRights14/11/13 12:44 AM
-3

Even Fox News has a Democratic Strategist on their network. You know that lone (few) voice to maintain that "fair & balance."
/r/MensRights03/11/13 01:16 AM
5

I'm all for gender exclusive events/places. More power to 'em! Let them have their safe spaces, just as long as we can have ours. The part that bothers me is that they may have an infinite amount of exclusive places, but will still protest the few that men want.
/r/MensRights03/11/13 01:10 AM
3

I've been approached by a few girls like this and my first reaction is to treat it as a troll and laugh. I usually play along or commend them for taking it so far, but it usually turns out being genuine. The only time it turned out being a troll was a sister of a girl I was talking to trying to pull a fast one.
/r/MensRights02/11/13 03:57 AM
9

Actually, I've known a few girls like this. This conversations feels eerily familiar.
/r/MensRights02/11/13 03:51 AM
28

Always the victim.
/r/MensRights26/10/13 11:57 PM
4

Well, of course. We're not uncivilized heathens.
/r/MensRights26/10/13 11:40 PM
2

"That" should be changed to "those" because sadly this is not an isolated case.
/r/MensRights26/10/13 02:04 AM
1

I think the problem is the understanding of what respect is. And what makes it so complicated is that "respect" is more complex than kind or admiration. Respect entails so much more. When a person respects another person, they are holding them up to a higher esteem and honor is bestowed. Respecting someone requires the a handful of utilities - including kindness and admiration, but that is apparent when certain criteria are met. When I am walking the streets, I cannot ascertain whether I hold a …
/r/MensRights15/10/13 01:43 AM
1

That's deep, man. And quite an indictment on society... one that I do not disagree with.
/r/MensRights15/10/13 01:29 AM
11

ITT: mistaking respect for politeness. Everyone deserves to be treated with kindness and as we would like to be treated ourselves, but the condition of being esteemed or honored is earned.
/r/MensRights14/10/13 12:37 AM
17

I think everyone deserves politeness for being human... FTFY Respect is earned, politeness is given.
/r/MensRights14/10/13 12:27 AM
1

You can still reproduce, you just don't have to do it mindlessly. Plus it must have something to do with the population. If there were only a couple million people in the world, then I'm sure this idea would be nonexistent, but with it at 8 Billion and climbing I think this mentality will only reflect the numbers. Our species isn't dependent on every male/female to copulate for the sole purpose of reproduction.
/r/MensRights13/10/13 01:44 AM
1

That was a great response.
/r/MensRights12/10/13 02:46 AM
3

This is a good point. Things may only change if women are getting affected as well and they speak out too.
/r/MensRights12/10/13 02:42 AM
2

Miss Judy Michau, welcome to the wonderful world of Men.
/r/MensRights12/10/13 02:40 AM
1

Shit, I knew someone would criticize that line. I left it in so it would be more recognizable, with only the actors name's changed.
/r/MensRights12/10/13 02:16 AM
2

Whoa... that escalated quickly.
/r/MensRights12/10/13 02:14 AM
-1

I'd like to think I'm more evolved b/c I am not driven/controlled by those primal instincts.
/r/MensRights10/10/13 02:11 AM
2

This is the greatest thing I've seen today!
/r/MensRights10/10/13 01:59 AM
-2

Imagine there's no Feminism It isn't hard to do Nothing to kill or die for And no MRA too Imagine all the Humanitarians Living life in peace...
/r/MensRights10/10/13 01:58 AM
1

You keep going to the astronaut analogy, but omit the element that everything that person made herself out to be is a lie. If she claimed to be an astronaut and turned out not to be, then she is a pathological liar. And that makes her untrustworthy. He will be wondering what other major thing she is lying about? Without trust, the relationship is doomed anyway. So, the fallacy that it doesn't matter because they love each other is disingenuous. The love is based on a lie, and not true love. I ha…
/r/MensRights10/10/13 01:50 AM
1

...but none of them constitute good reason to stop loving a child. This opens so many cans of worms. a.) Loving someone because you want to love them is different than being forced to love someone. b.) Even if there is a bond created between the man and the child, it will still be fraught with complications since he would still have to deal with the EX. And when he comes over to visit or wants to have visitations, but has to deal with the drama that most divorced couples with children have to de…
/r/MensRights10/10/13 01:43 AM
1

That's a beautiful thought, but not grounded in reality. If this was a perfect world, I'd say I would l love to take care of ALL the children of the world and give unlimited money to ensure their well-being. But you see, that's not possible and I am not that rich. And in all likelihood, this gentleman isn't that rich either. By your logic, you would have me forcibly choose a charity, then go into debt trying to afford to pay for that charity, whether or not I have the means or not. And if I ever…
/r/MensRights10/10/13 01:06 AM
48

This is absolutely baffling to me. What if he starts a new relationship and wants to have his own family, but can't do so because he has to pay for someone else's child?
/r/MensRights09/10/13 12:18 AM
4

Agreed. I feel like I wouldn't have been so lenient in that discussion. But then again, I have no vested interest in anyone there. I am not pals with any of the people there so I am coming from a POV of arguing against the injustice that is being discussed to its fullest degree. These folks may not be friends, but they are friendly with one another and are coworkers, so there is a limit to how far they can take that issue before it gets too heated to even be around each other. TL;DR - Watered do…
/r/MensRights09/10/13 12:11 AM
1

Like any other bully (male or female) you have to stand up for yourself. Since this is a work environment, that changes things slightly. The way you standup for yourself in this scenario is by being good at your job. Bonus points if you're better at it than she is. Focus yourself, be a quick learner, and do the hell out of your job. People will notice, and she'll lose her power. And you don't have to work hard forever, just long enough to establish yourself and to "get that monkey off your back.…
/r/MensRights02/10/13 03:13 PM
1

That's true. They already are wondering that while blaming men for not "man-ing up."
/r/MensRights22/09/13 01:42 PM
3

There is a subtle hint of not liking the bed they have to lay in now. As if bettering their own situation by destroying others doesn't have a happy ending. Next they'll be wondering where all the "good men" have gone, without even conceiving of the idea that they helped with the exodus.
/r/MensRights22/09/13 01:30 AM
1

You make a good point, and let me add to that by saying that's where makeup and the multitude of other cosmetic items come into play to make the "average" look above average. In truth, even average looking women enjoy a number of those benefits. As it is, majority of women between the ages of 18 to 30ish experience some form of being pedestalized. It's just the reality in the (western) world we live in. However, I agree, it is a choice and it is up to men to decide to do so and be responsible fo…
/r/MensRights19/09/13 11:16 PM
1

That is true, but what is even scarier is that same type of woman will put on a completely fake persona of someone who is the opposite of that, all while having that mentality in the background. It's not until deep into getting to know her will you see cracks in that armor and clues that she is not what she seems. Usually, that type of woman has a plan and is shocking good at carrying it out.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 01:53 AM
1

It saddens me to think that a lot of men out there will not see that red flag till it's too late.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 01:48 AM
2

In the 21st century the western world has allegedly surpassed the need to pedestalise women... Sadly, this is not the case. An attractive woman in western society is equivalent to a celebrity. She gets afforded all the benefits one would give a Hollywood A-Lister. Gorgeous women have all the doors open to them. They very much are put on pedestals.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 01:44 AM
1

Sounds like Feminist want to turn the western world into a more Middle-East type segregated society. Fine, but be careful what you wish for. It may have unforeseen consequences.
/r/MensRights11/09/13 04:34 AM
0

Sounds like this woman should have just gone to a sperm bank and signed whatever documents relieving the sperm donner (anonymous or otherwise) from any financial obligation and fulfilled her dream, as it were. She involved another person who did not want to be party to it and claimed to be the victim in this situation. She admits that the choice is only up to her and not him, yet it requires his participation in order to make it so. If she wants to push a bill that would make pregnancy sacred an…
/r/MensRights11/09/13 04:12 AM
1

The cackling. My god my ears.
/r/MensRights07/09/13 11:38 PM
20

The entitlement attitude runs deep. Majority of women feel entitled to a free meal on a first date, free drinks when out at bars, and free cover at most clubs. They want to stand shoulder to shoulder with men without having to give any of their benefits back. The very definition of - having your cake and eating it too.
/r/MensRights07/09/13 01:02 AM
4

Imagine an MRA subreddit when the world acknowledges both sides and treats both sides equal in the eyes of the courts. Imagine a subreddit that is not needed to show examples of women trying to climb to the top on the backs of fallen men. Imagine a Reddit when an MRA subreddit isn't needed any longer. Then we can gladly have only cute, happy pictures gracing this space.
/r/MensRights02/09/13 01:35 AM
5

OP clearly just made us all pedos by posting CP.
/r/MensRights02/09/13 01:30 AM
9

This was like watching your elementary teacher who only listens to classical music trying to rap the rules of conduct at an assembly in front of the whole school. /r/cringe would love this.
/r/MensRights01/09/13 12:05 AM
4

What truly concerns me is the hypocrisy and the dangerously judgmental implication of the multiple choices. Hypocrisy - namely #7 with #8. How can someone be fully responsible for their actions when they are drunk if being drunk can negatively affect one's own sexual decision-making? Wouldn't that person not be of "sound mind?" Judgmental Multiple Choices - It feels like any answer that is not "strongly" is subject to inquiry and further investigation. As if they are gotchas for weeding out poss…
/r/MensRights31/08/13 11:42 PM
1

Yeah, but men don't generally ask such questions because they want to get in their good graces. But there are a lot of tough questions men should ask women when on a date (2nd or 3rd at least.) Women ask finance related questions of men all the time.
/r/MensRights31/08/13 12:33 AM
8

You just brought up a great point. On a first date, when the woman asks what do you do for a living (and the like,) what if the man asked her "how much debt do you have?" Shouldn't their life/collegiate decisions be considered if planning to have a long term relationship?
/r/MensRights30/08/13 01:19 AM
22

Exactly. Sluts are beneficial to men and competition for other women.
/r/MensRights23/08/13 01:57 AM
3

Yeah, but when you're having a "rough day" like OP was having, maybe you just don't want to deal with any more extra drama at that moment. Sometimes, you just want to get that annoyance over with and get back to listening to birds chirping and the wind rustling as you contemplate your life.
/r/MensRights23/08/13 01:56 AM
3

Otherwise known as MGTOW.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 01:20 AM
24

I especially love how compliant the women in that group were to the blatant pandering and patronization. A blunt translation of that conversation: Women are emotional wrecks not fit to argue, so just massage their immature feelings with a passive aggressive & disingenuous gesture and all will be well.
/r/MensRights19/08/13 01:13 AM
3

This brings up a very interesting thought. What if... in America all public spaces & events end up becoming segregated by gender like they do in many Islamic countries? What would the two sides think about having separate everything?
/r/MensRights14/08/13 12:12 PM
1

As someone who exercises, I can confirm this. However, my point was missed here. Exercising is awesome and fundamentally good for you, but the workout I was talking about is a more intense, extreme level of workout. Sometimes referred to as "bootcamp" workout. If you watch the BTS videos of the actors of 300 doing their regiment prior to filming, you'll know what I mean. The harsh schedule and strict diet that Henry Cavill and others actors had/have to go through, in order to reach a particular …
/r/MensRights06/08/13 01:11 AM
0

Feminists just love to complain. They are in their element when there is things to complain about. Even if there isn't really much there to complain about they will conjure something up that is the fault of patriarchy or unrealistic standards. It's hard to listen to some of their complaints when they get jealous of dolls, celebs, their own friends/peers, their old parent's photos, commercials and everything else under the sun. (INFB) If they only knew that most people don't care, just as long as…
/r/MensRights04/08/13 01:26 AM
1

Agreed. Most healthy people (who are not Mr. Universe) can still look at He-Man and not feel depressed or negative in any way. Those feelings only come when there is something wrong with their self-esteem or body image.
/r/MensRights04/08/13 01:17 AM
5

Let me also add that, even if everything they did was natural (incredibly doubtful,) it is still unsustainable. If they only did what they say they did in interviews, then it's just not something any person can keep up with after the movie is done shooting. Henry Cavill isn't as big anymore as he was prior to shooting MOS. Brad Pitt does not have the body he had in Fight Club. It was only possible because it was part of their job. No one in their right mind would want to keep up with that kind o…
/r/MensRights04/08/13 01:12 AM
1

Posting here informs us. We can still do that without giving them our business. Only their actions can get attention not their content. And revenue isn't petty, when it can drive a company to push their agenda.
/r/MensRights26/07/13 03:44 PM
1

But don't they keep track of how many hits the page gets? And use that to generate more ad interest, which then provides more revenue?
/r/MensRights26/07/13 03:41 PM
3

Reason #358427 for MGTOW.
/r/MensRights26/07/13 01:53 AM
1

When I said screencaps, I assumed it was understood that I didn't mean "selective screencaps." There's a bot on here that does a great job at this. It takes a capture of everything on the site as it sees it (anyone sees it.) You basically get the same information. If you want any links on the sight, just type what you see in the url bar. Not that difficult. Point is to not give attention and revenue to junk.
/r/MensRights26/07/13 01:32 AM
1

I don't think you understood what I said. What I meant was "if it was just you two (no kids involved,) THEN I'd say... yada yada yada." But since that's not the case, "I feel for you." I completely agree with you on being there for your kids. No one in their right mind would say otherwise. I know the situation you're in is not how you intended, hence "the pickle," but I'm sure you'll get through it. If not for your own sanity, for those little rug rats that call you "daddy." Goodluck!
/r/MensRights25/07/13 07:04 AM
17

Please make a screencap(s) of the site next time so we don't give them more traffic for their shitty articles.
/r/MensRights25/07/13 04:38 AM
-1

I'd say get away from her. Leave without a trace and no way of her contacting you, but you were duped into having kids with her. I feel for you, man. You're in a pickle for sure.
/r/MensRights25/07/13 04:02 AM
0

Upvoted for making a screencap and not linking directly to the site.
/r/MensRights25/07/13 03:57 AM
3

I'm a bit disappointed that this is the highest voted post on the front page. There are so many more substantive posts than this.
/r/MensRights23/07/13 03:14 AM
1

I completely understand the concerns and frustrations being male, but in this case, this lady has no evidence to back up her claim and there are mountains of evidence on the gentleman's side. I know hind sight is 20/20, but he could have just said, "you know what else besides rape is bad... false rape accusations. Good thing there are so many people around, huh?"
/r/MensRights23/07/13 02:22 AM
25

I don't know why the guy in front backed down after the rape yell. There are countless witnesses there. He's golden, no need to succumb to her whims.
/r/MensRights22/07/13 01:52 AM
2

Race & gender are two very separate issues. And if you break it down further, there are circumstances where there ought not be discrimination based on gender. The point here is that all males of every race share commonalities with each other as all females with their sistren, but there are distinct differences between the genders that play a part in providing exclusions for each to have their own space.
/r/MensRights20/07/13 05:22 AM
2

Emma Roberts now joins the don't stick you dick in crazy club.
/r/MensRights20/07/13 05:01 AM
4

First of all everyone is welcome here. Greetings! MGTOW is not extreme. It's just their (our) right to partake or not. Many have decided to stay independent and prefer being on their own. Nothing wrong with that. I appreciate "me time" more the older I get. MGTOW ≠ Anti-women. 99.99999% of MGTOW have nothing against couples or the idea of relationships, they just have made a personal decision to not participate in that way.
/r/MensRights17/07/13 04:56 AM
1

I think we're better than that. The movement is sullied if we lowered ourselves to petty retaliations like this. It's better to call them out on it, then to become what we despise.
/r/MensRights12/07/13 03:55 AM
2

Wow. The lady in red isn't shy at all about her radical feminist views.
/r/MensRights11/07/13 02:10 AM
2

Listening to this was infuriating. So much horseshit blaming & shaming is over-whelming. (That kinda rhymed.)
/r/MensRights11/07/13 02:03 AM
4

This is how feminism view their point of view, but it's not the whole story. "Equal" doesn't always mean equal. For example, wanting to have the same take home pay as men (in general,) but with less time worked and in field-of-studies much lower on the rung. Also, happens in Wimbledon.
/r/MensRights11/07/13 01:31 AM
5

It seems like every week something new pops up reminding why I am better off without it.
/r/MensRights01/07/13 01:09 AM
3

You fight them by becoming blind to gender, and expecting equality of everyone. Sometimes each gender provides something unique from the other. Sometimes the difference between genders is a good thing and should be celebrated. We have much in common, but we also have aspects that differentiate from the other. These don't make either side weaker or lesser, but more of an asset by bringing different tools to the table. There seems to be a wave of influence sweeping the western world trying to elim…
/r/MensRights26/06/13 11:27 PM
1

Couldn't agree more.
/r/MensRights21/06/13 10:21 PM
5

First of all, I want to commend open minded women such as yourself. It's a sign that "everything" isn't going to hell. Secondly, I agree, 1.,2., & 4. are more general, but can vary with couples. As for the rest: (3.) Most of the time, you'll lose your single friends. Married couples, especially the ones that have kids while their single friends do not, will begin to have less and less things in common. When they sit down to discuss each other's problems they'll learn they have less and less issu…
/r/MensRights21/06/13 12:03 AM
4

“I didn’t leave mine lightly and many times I have wondered if I did the right thing. There have been nights when I’ve ended up sobbing, thinking 'What am I doing in a strange country with no job, no husband, no friends, no home?’ But through quitting the conventional path I discovered who I really am.” Sounds like a lot of regrets and the realization that...
/r/MensRights20/06/13 01:25 AM
24

The results of entitlement culture FTFY
/r/MensRights18/06/13 07:33 PM
2

This needs to be the top comment. Or even some kind of suggestion before posting.
/r/MensRights18/06/13 07:27 PM
3

Lock up this usurper in the dungeons!
/r/MensRights08/06/13 04:30 AM
2

Maybe the Lord Of Light abandoned her and she's lost her powers?
/r/MensRights07/06/13 11:45 PM
9

And even then, she'll be unhappy.
/r/MensRights03/06/13 08:43 PM
5

System File Checker? School Facility Consultants? I am only a young girl and know little of such matters, so will someone elaborate what SFC means?
/r/MensRights02/06/13 12:40 AM
1

You're right that if there isn't also a space for men, then that is wrong. If women are provided a "safe" space, then men should have one as well. I wonder if the men at OP's university wanted their own space, would that be a problem?
/r/MensRights29/05/13 12:33 AM
1

I think, the solution here is common sense. Are all our bathrooms unisex? Of course not. Separating for gender is not the same as separating for race. Plus, I share your concern that we don't want to start separating in every venue/building/organization based on gender, but that is not what I'm proposing. And I definitely am drawing a line. The line can be and should be determined by using common sense. Only provide separate areas as long as the general area is communal, equal accommodations for…
/r/MensRights29/05/13 12:25 AM
2

The WSJ is far from perfect, but it was one of the best American papers in my estimation. Since Murdoch took it over, the WSJ has declined in it's quality some. There are still some good journalism, financial news, and OpEd's to be enjoyed from it's pages, but there is an air of bias and corruption that has swept into it's halls that is synonymous with News Corp.
/r/MensRights29/05/13 12:14 AM
2

I disagree. Gender and race are not the same. And they have various levels of differences that are exclusive to each. We separate for gender when using bathrooms and not for color of skin for obvious reasons. So it goes to show that there are also other gender issues that are not in the wheel house of races. Should we mix both sexes in every single place? No exceptions? Or can we appreciate that sometimes men/women just want to have some space of their own?
/r/MensRights28/05/13 11:57 PM
2

This will piss off a lot of people and go against the grain here, but I'm all for separate spaces. There should definitely be unisex in general areas, but why shouldn't there be spaces for just men or just women? I find problems with them only if they are the only types of accommodations around or if there is gross disparities between the two. However, sometimes men just want to be away from the opposite sex as women want to be with just their sisteren. Why not provide that space? If everyone wo…
/r/MensRights28/05/13 11:52 PM
2

Oh, I don't disagree with you. The Left isn't immune to biases & catering to their own agendas. Still, I wonder which is worse The Guardian or say News Of The World? Plus there are trash newspapers and then there is The Daily Mail.
/r/MensRights28/05/13 11:43 PM
1

It's a fascinating thing that two similar societies can have opposite problems. You may be disappointed in your "left wing politics," but I wonder if you would trade that to have crazy "right wing politics?" In other words, would you rather live in the US with all it's political problems, corporate cable news, & shrinking journalism or deal with the newspapers you have and the significantly better news programs?
/r/MensRights28/05/13 11:17 PM
9

I was with you until "left wing trash." The Guardian may not be perfect, but it's no Daily Mail, WSJ, or The Sun. Then again, the British standard of journalism is much higher than the US, so there is that as well.
/r/MensRights27/05/13 11:48 PM
5

Interestingly enough, it could have gone the same way if the gentleman decided to not open the door and ignore her, she probably would have felt like he was being hostile and her absurdity being mocked by her peers. People like this have abnormal traits and don't usually gel within a team environment.
/r/MensRights25/05/13 11:35 PM
26

The truth proof shall set you free. Contacting the police ahead of time would work greatly to his benefit. He can let the police department know that he has traveled far to see his biological son and explain his situation. Instead of arresting him on the grandparent's property, they can give him advice on how to expedite his visitation/custody. He'll have an easier time of doing this by coming prepared with proof and willing to take a DNA test.
/r/MensRights18/05/13 01:49 AM
2

Agreed. OP, in the future, please make a screencap and post on imgur/minus or copy & paste text instead of linking to actual website. We're just giving them webtraffic in the same way idiots who buy books just to burn them are giving revenue to the authors they hate.
/r/MensRights04/05/13 12:47 AM
-1

This is the perfect example of some women affecting lives of all women. Feminist who are trying to stop men from complimenting them, are trying to speak for all women. The most effective opposition to this would be if it came from other women who do not agree. Feminism's ongoing attempt at killing chivalry and social politeness. I'd hate to live in world where strangers couldn't smile at one another or feel uncomfortable sparking a light-hearted banter in an elevator. (Unfortunately, we're alrea…
/r/MensRights04/05/13 12:43 AM
26

You're a freaking godsend. I only wish there would be a Good Samaritan like you around if I were in such an egregious situation.
/r/MensRights28/04/13 12:23 AM
1

I assumed they were talking about consent given prior to and during sex, then afterwards changed their minds.
/r/MensRights26/04/13 12:03 AM
11

Of course there are men who still want those things, but the tides are beginning to shift because of [all the things listed in this video.] I know Louis CK was joking, but his latest bit about he is most happiest now that he's divorced kinda rings true. (Paraphrased) He has a good relationship and is friends with his exwife because the space away from her and the reason he's a good father is because he gets to say bye to them for half of the week and have time for himself. Some may not agree, bu…
/r/MensRights16/04/13 02:45 AM
2

What's sad and ironic (if that's even the correct term here) is the position Feminists hold here is more in line with the old world masculine mindframe that they swear up and down they are against. And the MRM response is what Feminism should actually take. That idea that men ought to get over it, "man up," or it's a blessing in disguise is what tough men used to tell one another. The MRM stance that the same standard applied to one gender ought to be applied to both, is in actuality the way to …
/r/MensRights08/04/13 11:36 PM
2

I'm at a crossroads (once again on Reddit.) I've noticed quite a few posts on /MR about name calling or the like. I'm on the fence (tbh: more one one side...I'll explain) because name calling & making fun can be degrading and rude (which is bad,) but then again most of the time it's harmful if you let it be. And most of the time it's just people being silly. I'd rather be able to call a cunty woman a bitch, than not be able to curse because both sides made it next to impossible. If a man is exag…
/r/MensRights02/04/13 10:55 PM
1

So, in order to get what you seek, we must stop them from having that same thing? I don't understand this logic. Seems to me that in order to curb the double standard, don't balk at it, but use that as evidence to progress your (equal) agenda.
/r/MensRights31/03/13 11:22 PM
8

Feminists want their man and to eat them too.
/r/MensRights31/03/13 12:39 AM
2

Because it's a PyLadies group meeting? Why do people always want to be involved in everyone else's group? Let them have their space, for gawd sakes. You'll be glad for it when you build a tree house with just your best mate and that smelly kid down the block with all the new vidya games.
/r/MensRights31/03/13 12:28 AM
14

Girl1: No. You don't have to get me anything for Valentine's Day. Guy1: Okay. Girl1: Why didn't you get me anything for Valentine's Day? Guy1: I thought you said... Girl1: No doesn't always mean no. Girl2: You're so hot. Guy2: So are you. You wanna go to the bedroom? Girl2: Yes. Guy2: You sure? I know we've only been dating a short while... Girl1: It's cool. Guy2 Months Later: I don't think it's going to work out between us. Girl2: I wish you would have told me before you forced me to have sex w…
/r/MensRights28/03/13 01:22 AM
2

I'm curious, what would the opposite of this be?
/r/MensRights25/03/13 02:20 AM
0

That's because the slut shaming that has been privy to your eyes/ears has only been from the male gender. It is quite possible that what other women may have said about you was behind your back.
/r/MensRights25/03/13 02:02 AM
1

Everything besides tattoos and dyed hair. Call me crazy, but I like skin over ink. Also, even though when a girl is covered in body paint or tattoos and is technically nude, the visual obstacle makes it seem like she's not. Tatts are like scars and blemishes that get in the way of bare skin.
/r/MensRights25/03/13 01:54 AM
3

Agreed. What kind of nonsense is this? I hope it doesn't become common place.
/r/MensRights25/03/13 01:48 AM
8

Such a non issue. What, is MRM now against joking? Especially a harmless joke that doesn't degrade anyone? Jesus. H. Christ, the saying "suck my dick" has never been used in the same spirit as a girl saying any version of fuck me. One's an insult, the other is anything but. In fact, most men would welcome it. Stop with these silly, non-issues. It just makes this sub sound petty.
/r/MensRights25/03/13 01:28 AM
1

If you run into her in public then start recording. Phone, digital recorder whatever. Agreed. Should have started recording from the moment things got hairy. Record everything!
/r/MensRights10/03/13 11:41 PM
24

It sounds like whoever wrote this article is a 12 year old. FTFY
/r/MensRights10/03/13 01:15 AM
1

Hmmm, that's a good point. There are just as many (if not more) cunts here than on the copyright brigade.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 12:27 AM
3

I think this is actually a good one. Perhaps give it it's own paragraph. Could include a barrage of labels or put-downs thrown towards men that women do not have to endure.
/r/MensRights24/02/13 02:12 AM
1

Side Note: It would appear the industry pays a lot of attention to Reddit comments & posts because a video can be alive for a while, but soon after it shows up on Reddit, the Copyright Police jumps into action. Case in point your links, tyciol. They have been nuked!
/r/MensRights21/02/13 12:41 AM
1

Indeed. It makes me think of that "fat girl" in the group of hot girls at a club. Just because her experiences with the men at the club has made her bitter, she's going to try to ruin it for the rest of the group. In this same way, the FB poster actually backfires and makes women look bad.
/r/MensRights21/02/13 12:36 AM
1

It's a pretty condescending and self important and misogynist way of looking at it. This is exactly what I've been saying for ages about American commercials that pander to women and make men look like dupes. And rarely does a woman object. However, my guess is Moore here isn't as much as pandering or being condescending, but laying down and letting women walk over him. He appears more than comfortable with letting women get the upper hand because he may gain favor with them. It's a sad, forever…
/r/MensRights21/02/13 12:30 AM
48

The reason why that Marine poster works so well is because he knows his bro would do the same for him. Whereas, that FB horse manure is so one sided, it makes the man's care and loyalty a chore.
/r/MensRights19/02/13 01:48 AM
3

Wow. You make an excellent point. I wonder if his opinions would change if he lost a hundred or so pounds and took pride in his appearance. Something tells me his White Knight persona would be so mind blown with how much different his experiences would become.
/r/MensRights19/02/13 01:32 AM
2

"Would you rather swim in a pool with a shark or a minnow" Something not discussed is, what are they being fed? If they are given a steady diet of their liking, then a human could potentially swim with either without any problems. And in such a case, the shark can coexist with the human. On the flip-side - if they are both being starved, then it doesn't matter if it's shark(s) or minnows, they'll eventually want to feed on the human to stay alive. I didn't know Michael Moore was that far left. H…
/r/MensRights19/02/13 01:29 AM
1

It was, except first "change" should be "revolution."
/r/MensRights19/02/13 01:10 AM
1

I understand what you're trying to get at, but I have to respectfully disagree. Some times people can be wrong. A person's feelings towards it can be marred by misconceptions and misinformation. You're right, porn isn't good or bad; it's both. It has it's benefits and to an obsessive degree, it can also be detrimental. I can understand if a couple is having problems because one of them is watching "too much" of it, to the point where they don't make time for their partner, and that's when the co…
/r/MensRights13/02/13 01:33 AM
6

And porn? Why the hell is porn bad? Clearly the author doesn't understand men.
/r/MensRights12/02/13 01:50 AM
7

Nicely done! A great counter to the original. In the spirit of MRA = Human Rights, there ought to be alternative posters of these where each gender looks inwards instead of attacks outwards (eg. GIRLS - a woman who has no self worth creating conflict where there is none and a woman who has confidence in herself creating calm and pleasant environment around her... BOYS - a man who tells a woman what she wants to hear when he knows the opposite to be true and a man who gives it to her straight eve…
/r/MensRights12/02/13 01:30 AM
2

DailyMail? Not even once.
/r/MensRights11/02/13 03:27 AM
1

Yes, but can we use actual articles instead of 4chan threads? There's no way of confirming the validity of any story on there w/o sources.
/r/MensRights11/02/13 03:26 AM
0

I'm more disappointed that you made me read that horrible dribble. Yes, she referred to guys as "penises," but what's much worse is this article made me dumber just reading it.
/r/MensRights01/02/13 10:27 PM
29

That moment when she saw the bill and handed over her card must have been priceless. That's like sending over 2 dozen large pizzas with anchovies and pickles to an enemies house and paying the bill yourself.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 07:26 PM
2

Assuming you are in a relationship and/or have a family. How long have you been the breadwinner? What are your expectations/goals of your partner & yourself? Are you the sole provider? How do you feel about being the breadwinner 5 or 10 years down the road?
/r/MensRights17/01/13 09:49 PM
5

You're not alone, brother. Seriously though what are we going to do about it? You know, when they say "the marketplace will decide," well in this case society will make that gradual turn. The more men learn that they do not have much of a say (from the court's perspective) in a marriage, then there will be a push back from getting married. Same goes for the economy and just plain preferences for not having children. The more information is absorbed about how much a man will be at a disadvantage …
/r/MensRights14/01/13 03:43 AM
1

Yeah, but no one is chastising them for it. "Hey gurl. U wanna make some babies... on Sims?"
/r/MensRights08/01/13 11:54 PM
2

Does that mean 10-14 hr/day gaming will be acceptable now?
/r/MensRights08/01/13 01:08 AM
1

Glad to hear you have gained further perspective from r/MR. Just wanted to add to the Nobody is entitled to anything in a relationship. Entitled? I guess not, but responsibilities? Certainly! In order to keep the relationship flourishing, it requires fulfilling certain needs by both parties.
/r/MensRights22/11/12 12:42 AM
5

Funny as always, but I'm not sure it is relevant here. It doesn't matter that McCarthy is attractive, Bieber didn't reciprocate. He wasn't having any of it and even cringed. It does speak to Pitbull's response though.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 10:32 PM
3

Tell that to GWB. Technically, you are right, but with certain elements in place a perfect storm is formed. A President who can influence his minions (Congress) Staunch Republicans falling in organized party line Spineless Democrat opposition giving in to all demands Orchestrated Govt lies told by the cabinet & media to gain public complacency
/r/MensRights12/10/12 06:58 PM
-1

I agree. Let me qualify that with - "most subs of Reddit get riled up easily." However, there are many that do good works with bringing injustice to light as well.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 05:24 PM
1

Keep in mind, as well, that we're only getting her version of the events.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 05:05 PM
2

Technically, we've only heard one side of the story. Who knows how accurate the accounts of that encounter was by this person.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 05:03 PM
1

I tried searching for it as well, but to no avail. The skit in question is called "The Love Contract" from episode #204.
/r/MensRights22/09/12 06:02 PM
1

My guess is they'll think it's bad too, taking the excitement out of this scenario.
/r/MensRights21/09/12 08:48 PM
5

And even then, they don't have to say it (according to the law.) So, you're fucked either way. (Sorry for the pun.)
/r/MensRights21/09/12 08:29 PM
1

Communication works, except when the woman is in the mood for sex and not in the mood to talk. There is more time for communication during a relationship, but a chance encounter may not offer a moment to have a lengthy discussion on what rape means to one another. It can spoil the mood just as asking the woman to wear a dental dam.
/r/MensRights21/09/12 08:27 PM
2

Speaking of satire, the Chappelle Show's Consent Form skit couldn't be more relevant than in this thread.
/r/MensRights21/09/12 08:15 PM
0

"S.O.O.W."?
/r/MensRights21/09/12 07:56 PM
1

So this is a dramatized/scripted educational video? I assumed this was from a roundtable discussion. Disappointed.
/r/MensRights21/09/12 07:50 PM
1

I'm curious why the police department didn't simultaneously hold a class with the males as it relates to them?
/r/MensRights15/09/12 02:31 PM
1

Yeah, but you're not going to search torrents for a 30 second or 2 minute viral video. And in most cases, there aren't any torrents of it. But there are tons of streaming sites; the person making a complaint on youtube may not chase down the same video on metacafe, vevo, or where ever.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 11:44 PM
11

Host your videos on vimeo, dailymotion, and other streaming sites. Youtube is not the only video resource any more.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 01:01 AM
2

I'll normally open the door without being asked, but if she's going to act entitled and demand it of me, then I'd question the condition of her limbs.
/r/MensRights30/07/12 10:41 AM
26

Really? I thought she was way too nice. I was bubbling just reading how supportive the husband was while this absurd woman was ready to throw the person she vowed to spend the rest of her life with under the bus over unresolved issues within herself. (Just my opinion. I can tell the MR hive has already spoken though.)
/r/MensRights23/07/12 02:04 AM
4

It's posted here because it has everything to do with men, how we were conditioned to act during these situations, and our thought process regarding this. If nothing, it opens a dialogue. If you don't want to be part of the discussion, then that's your right, but that doesn't mean others should abstain as well. Personally, I'd like to see the conditioning to evolve into trying to save your loved one as well as yourself. Men's lives are no less important than their counterpart. To be honest, I th…
/r/MensRights23/07/12 01:31 AM
1

DAE not see the underlying sexism this is actually proposing towards women? This policy is basically stating that women are so dumb that they need the "over-representation" at American universities and their counterparts don't, implying they are much more capable. Shouldn't both genders be angered by this? It would be in the best interest of the country to make it easier for both men & women to get a degree.
/r/MensRights12/07/12 12:24 AM
2

More people should walk a mile in the shoes of the opposite sex to experience how unfair our laws can be to the other gender.
/r/MensRights06/06/12 11:01 PM
3

Is shedding light on things women can do better so taboo? I'm all for casting equal light one either side, so maybe I may not be the right person to answer this question. Perhaps directing it at the media or those who feel an offense at that very thought? I guess the way I see it, we've always been in disharmony. That's why the whole feminist movement started, we wanted to be treated like human beings capable of more than cooking a meal, popping out kids and taking a dick. Right you are, humans …
/r/MensRights17/04/12 11:42 AM
7

I struck up a convo with a guy once, in his attempts to charm me he told me he owned his own house, A couple guys have dropped that line before... I don't know these guys personally, but I gotta think that the stigma put on a man's financial situation during the early stages plays some part in it. For what it's worth, you are in the minority (from too many men's perspective.) I and just about every guy I know or had discussions with have more stories of girls like that than women like you. You m…
/r/MensRights16/04/12 05:26 AM
2

There are some who were in the first category (to whatever degree) and wanted something more without playing the "game," who found themselves frustrated with what they experienced and decided to become one of the MGTOW.
/r/MensRights16/04/12 01:03 AM
13

What you read are experiences of those who commented. I think common sense decrees that no one here is speaking for the entire gender. Most of us here can only speak to our own personal experiences. The truly "sad" part is that so many of us have these same horrible experiences. There is a terrible pattern here and for these same folks, there is a noticeable change occurring in the environment of dating. It has become more frequent to experiences these behaviors from this side of the isle. I'm s…
/r/MensRights16/04/12 12:49 AM
1

Everything that has been said in this thread hits so close to home. Thanks for the book suggestion, fellas. I'm definitely picking it up.
/r/MensRights16/04/12 12:35 AM
8

TIL there is an actual name for what I'm doing.
/r/MensRights16/04/12 12:30 AM
9

The reason why some Germans and Japanese "find it hard to be proud of their countries" based on past stains on their history is because they have something called humility. Meanwhile in America...
/r/MensRights03/04/12 07:55 AM
3

"You should be coy & evasive to your boyfriend because he'll think you're exciting and want to be with you more, but if your boyfriend is coy or evasive you should demand answers and accuse him of cheating." - Cosmo
/r/MensRights28/03/12 11:34 PM
4

I wonder what these same women would think if America went back to a gender segregated society?
/r/MensRights22/03/12 11:27 PM
8

If women don't like it, then they should lobby to change the laws. One can't highlight this statement enough. The importance of addressing the illness and not just the symptom. Women are finding it hard to secure mentors for the same reason. There's a definite climate of fear in many work environments. Also the sensitive work environment that male teachers have to cope with.
/r/MensRights23/02/12 12:09 AM
1

I'd be curious to see what response you get for _pH's suggestion from r/twoxchromosomes.
/r/MensRights23/02/12 12:05 AM
0

The way I see it is, that woman is part of a long legacy of demur, submissive women at the tail end of male dominated abuse. We've reached a point in human history where the pendulum is shifting. It's become one of the most repulsive acts (man abusing a woman in any capacity) that any form of retaliation or even preemptive action garners celebration. I wonder if these women realize that they are making things worse for themselves in the long run. And that using the same abhorrent tactic to retal…
/r/MensRights20/02/12 12:52 AM
5

Thank you for seeing this as a "human" rights issue and not the betterment of one gender above another. One gender doesn't have to fail in order for the other to succeed.
/r/MensRights18/02/12 12:44 AM
105

Girls become stalkers when they: ... FTFY
/r/MensRights31/01/12 10:03 PM
5

Source?
/r/MensRights31/01/12 12:49 AM
2

There are a whole slew of reasons why marriage is looking less & less desirable. The times... they are a changing.
/r/MensRights27/01/12 01:06 AM
1

You missed the point completely. Try reading what I wrote again.
/r/MensRights09/01/12 07:44 PM
24

I'll just come right out and say it - this isn't a knock at men's intelligence, but a blatant attack on women's. This plays to what they see as the insecurities & emotions of women to make them feel like they are actually superior to their male counterparts. It reinforces the idea that women know how to run a household better than men, who are no more capable then their toddler or pet. It is done to bolster confidence. Confidence = sales. This is the advertisers fibbing on the first date to all …
/r/MensRights08/01/12 11:37 PM
2

What's so great about getting married anyways? It's the stigma from the older generations, I tells ya! It would be a hell of a lot simpler by not getting married and just make the personal vow to one another. Also the laws should be amended to reflect that.
/r/MensRights02/01/12 04:49 AM
1

That's a stretch. They share portions of the blame, I agree. Difference here is rich men splurging on women is not an unethical act.
/r/MensRights10/12/11 01:08 AM
3

Her latest victim.
/r/MensRights09/12/11 12:02 PM
1

I felt bad for that poor sap.
/r/MensRights09/12/11 11:52 AM
4

Well some rich guys think this is their leverage over moderate-income men. They can win by throwing more money at the girl.
/r/MensRights09/12/11 11:44 AM
1

This has opened my eyes significantly. I didn't think this was even possible? Perhaps the first few times dates should be inexpensive (eg. walk in the park, coffee & scones, trip to the zoo/museum/gallery on open-to-public-day, etc.) And if there is chemistry & potential, then more elaborate outings.
/r/MensRights09/12/11 11:42 AM
4

Yet another score for FAPPING. Sex is amazing, but also highly over-rated at times and almost always full of baggage. Sometimes, it's really not worth the added drama & worry over things that are out of your control. It's very difficult to gauge whether someone you've come to trust will change their minds on you the last minute, altering the rest of your life as you know it. I hope the day comes when adolescent boys are offered a yearly (voluntary) shot, not unlike the female HPV vaccine, which …
/r/MensRights23/11/11 02:19 AM
3

If this is grounds for sterilization, then there'd be a shit ton of women who'd have to go under that operation. I've talked to a quite a few women who think their biological clock supersedes the male's say in it.
/r/MensRights23/11/11 02:09 AM
2

Men (in general) don't think this way. This isn't a concern to "most" women because the male thinking is far from this. There are definitely men who want to be daddies more than anything, but it is very rare for any of them to go to that extreme. Now if, on the off chance, that a male did such a dastardly deed; then it's a good indicator that he's got more serious issues lurking.
/r/MensRights21/11/11 02:29 AM
1

Side Note: Anyone else snicker at the name of the Reporter Outside the Courthouse?
/r/MensRights16/11/11 06:56 AM
0

Oh, just vandalism. Carry on.
/r/MensRights24/09/11 07:01 PM
4

That'll prove to these fearful irrational women that men are nonviolent.
/r/MensRights23/09/11 11:28 PM
3

If men do it, it's voyeuristic porn; if women do it, it's good o'l harmless fun.
/r/MensRights25/08/11 11:10 PM
15

Actually, I think chicks were pretty reasonable. They chicks conclude that "the guy should not have to pay child support if he was raped. He should have to pay if he wasn't raped" Actually only 1 in those 5 girls agreed he should not pay because he said he was raped. The other 4 couldn't fathom his rape even being plausible. They question how he could have been raped. The fact that men are stronger than women, and that the woman he was allegedly raped by someone she was in a relationship with ar…
/r/MensRights12/08/11 01:45 AM
1

Or having knowledge may keep you/someone you care about out of trouble or be taken advantage of. Ignorance Is Bliss Knowledge Is Power
/r/MensRights10/08/11 12:37 AM
1

So basically you're just playing the part of the obligatory redditor who chimes in with the predictable "repost" comment in every goddamn thread? Nothing to see here then? 'kay moving on.
/r/MensRights09/08/11 12:16 PM
2

Is it a repost if it was posted at a different subreddit? http://www.reddit.com/r/WTF/comments/hr3pc/girls_strip_11_year_old_boy_and_post_on_youtube/ If OP was aware, then I agree; "X POST" in title & perhaps a link to original thread would have been nice.
/r/MensRights09/08/11 09:42 AM
1

I'm curious why the "Other Discussions" tab didn't pop up at the top of this thread. Or is it just my browser playing tricks on me? Edit: The previous post you are speaking of was @ r/wtf, not here.
/r/MensRights09/08/11 09:35 AM
1

Imagine the benefits if this mentality was not exclusive to just the internet, as well.
/r/MensRights02/08/11 11:21 PM
1

I wonder if dating sites ought to disable sending out messages for males and put that burden on the female members only? Goes without saying that replying to messages should be enabled, but if the responsibility was laid on the doorstep of women, then maybe there would be less of an "entitled" feeling garnered from the pick of the litter of her flooded inbox. Taking away the luxury of being lazy and sought after, she would be put in the position to engage those she is interested in talking to, w…
/r/MensRights02/08/11 10:25 PM
12

Seemed like Julie Chen was instigating a lot of it as well. Setting the tone & posing the loaded questions.
/r/MensRights19/07/11 02:28 AM
2

Yeah I get that, and my personal opinion is that's the horrible direction to take society. "The current situation" = a dull, stuck-up feminist utopia. That very notion discourages male/female interaction with very little wiggle room to be playful. Something out of a bad sexual harassment seminar video. Instead of being more sensitive about flirtatious behaviors and scoffing at how people interact with one another, we could save our anger for situations when someone has truly been harassed and se…
/r/MensRights10/07/11 05:38 AM
5

Note to self: "don't feed the trolls."
/r/MensRights09/07/11 11:24 PM
2

It's "the game" and the continuation of playing it in such a manner that are pulling the two sexes apart. What can be a beautiful thing is being sullied & taken advantage of.
/r/MensRights09/07/11 11:14 PM
2

Many origins of passionate arguments contrive from being scorned by related experiences (not saying that's the case here. How do you know?) Can't injustice be retorted by valid observations and thoughtful dialogue? Why does one have to be chastised for it?
/r/MensRights09/07/11 11:11 PM
10

What it seems like is, OP is suggesting that since women, of late, have taken a very hard line with sexual harassment so should men? Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think both sides need to dial it back a notch. We can create a society of people with sticks up their ass or we can not assume the worst from others at the slightest of gestures. Choose your battles wisely.
/r/MensRights09/07/11 12:13 PM
14

I particularly chortled at the ending... Sitting on the stoop getting their hair braided by other girls. Long t-shirts that go down to the kneecaps and look like skirts. Colorful clothes. Obsession with fashion, shopping, shoes and accessorizing. Love of jewelry. Grooming obsessions that would put metrosexuals to shame. The more you think about it, the more you’ll notice and come up with your own examples.
/r/MensRights05/11/10 10:14 PM
3

I'm incredibly fascinated to see how this plays out in the coming decades? If the gender gaps continue to widen, will that affect the roles each gender plays in the following generations?
/r/MensRights26/09/10 06:50 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter