| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | He ain't wrongThings is, TV packages aren't sold per match but for the entire tournament, including men's matches, women's matches and every form of doubles/wheelchair/what-not. You could theoretically keep track of the price of each ad, and how many viewers each match gets but then you're introducing the opportunity for bias to creep into the system. On top of that; it's the tournament that pays out the prices, but the TV station that sells the adverts. The tournament doesn't care much about how each individ… | /r/PussyPassDenied | 09/07/19 07:52 AM |
| 5 | He ain't wrongIt's never quite as simple as what can be contained in a single tweet. That 13% is what FIFA pays out to all the FA's with the winner getting the biggest share. How much each player gets is up to the USSF which is where the rub starts. And that's just win bonuses, the players each get a standard fee per game they are selected for, that's also lower for women than it is for men. BTW, several European nations have already pledged to bring the salaries of womens national teams in line with the sala… | /r/PussyPassDenied | 08/07/19 01:29 PM |
| 24 | He ain't wrongMatch durations is irrelevant with regards to monetary reward. It's revenue that counts and when you start getting into that it becomes almost impossible disentangle how much revenue each gender brings in at a tournament like Wimbledon. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 08/07/19 01:15 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter