| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | I need feminism because men aren't subservient and deserve to be because they invented racism. (X-Post TumblrInAction)It's a cross-post; the discussion over there will be more amused. | /r/MensRights | 02/10/13 01:58 AM |
| 6 | As a subreddit, lets have a conversation about male gender roles.A little quick on the trigger there, in my opinion. I don't really think "Mr. Manly" is a slur - especially given the preceding sentence. | /r/MensRights | 23/09/13 04:16 AM |
| 1 | As a subreddit, lets have a conversation about male gender roles.To try and present the point that mockturtlestory brought up in a more robust manner, this may be because a number of cultures prevented women from owning property or holding power (not exerting, but holding, mind); this is thought to be one of the reasons for the bit on homosexuality in the Old Testament (the Leviticus bit, not the story of Sodom, which is actually about the guest law, not homosexuality. Ahem.); as women were treated as chattel in the society depicted within, for a man to lie w… | /r/MensRights | 23/09/13 04:09 AM |
| 1 | As a subreddit, lets have a conversation about male gender roles.Pardon me here a moment, all this gender stuff isn't my topic of specialty, but what sort of data are you looking for here? I think I grasp why you mistrust gender studies textbooks, but what kind of surveys or anecdotes or so forth are you interested in? | /r/MensRights | 23/09/13 03:59 AM |
| 1 | As a subreddit, lets have a conversation about male gender roles.The gender roles or the people? ;) | /r/MensRights | 23/09/13 03:56 AM |
| 12 | My (then) GF asked me "how can misandry be a thing?" **right** as we drove under this billboard.I'm reminded of an onion article. | /r/MensRights | 23/09/13 03:43 AM |
| 3 | Baffled by teen boys, experts keep trying to turn them into girls. Surprise — it’s not working.Oh, it's been done a few times. But yes; you're exactly right; the -oid is for resembling or being akin to, so "android" is rather literally "has the form of a man", and gynoid would be equivalent. Generally when they're seen in fiction, Gynoids are the "perfect woman" from a male's perspective (owing to the eras they were featured in part), so you get things like the Stepford Wives or...well, you've seen Blade Runner, right? It's Scifi, so it makes an interesting way to explore gender issues - … | /r/MensRights | 27/08/13 04:05 AM |
| 2 | Baffled by teen boys, experts keep trying to turn them into girls. Surprise — it’s not working.Technically the opposite of gyno is andro (Greek roots; female and male, respectively), so "Androcracy"? | /r/MensRights | 27/08/13 02:15 AM |
| 9 | Baffled by teen boys, experts keep trying to turn them into girls. Surprise — it’s not working.Just to mention, this is what is considered the difference between "authoritative" and "authoritarian" parenting - or was back when I took my high-school psych class. To be authoritative, let the child have input; you still lay down the law, but you talk about why that's the case, let them voice opinions and suggestions, and perhaps even compromise once in a while. That is, generally assume that they're a rational being once they start showing signs of such as you suggest. | /r/MensRights | 27/08/13 02:13 AM |
| -4 | TIL the doctor who ran the famous gender identity study on identical twin boys where one was raised as a girl falsified his data for 30 years, and that the boy never actually accepted his female identity : x-post todayilearnedEh, close enough; at least you're tolerant. | /r/MensRights | 24/07/13 05:50 AM |
| 1 | TIL the doctor who ran the famous gender identity study on identical twin boys where one was raised as a girl falsified his data for 30 years, and that the boy never actually accepted his female identity : x-post todayilearnedThat's a bit of a non-answer, I'm afraid. It is interesting, however, that you mistake what I present as suggesting a dichotomy when it is merely two of the three ways to intemperate your comment I found most likely. I asked because I did not understand your intent, and after your reply, I still don't. | /r/MensRights | 24/07/13 03:40 AM |
| 1 | TIL the doctor who ran the famous gender identity study on identical twin boys where one was raised as a girl falsified his data for 30 years, and that the boy never actually accepted his female identity : x-post todayilearnedExcuse me for a moment here, I'm confused; are you being supportive of the transgendered, critical of the transgendered, or just dismissive of scientific or psychological findings about gender? | /r/MensRights | 24/07/13 02:49 AM |
| 9 | /r/bestof no longer accepts links from /r/mensrightsThough I worry you flatter me just for the sake of the joke, I do appreciate the thought. Thank you. | /r/MensRights | 24/07/13 02:09 AM |
| 9 | /r/bestof no longer accepts links from /r/mensrightsWell that's the other thing; because women have been a persecuted group, it's easier to call people out (or groups, by association). Don't get me wrong, it's not fair; they are quite likely neglecting what would more properly be described as bigotry from the 'other side'. My argument above is not phrased as the other subreddits involved would phrase it, but rather as I see it standing outside. | /r/MensRights | 24/07/13 02:08 AM |
| 64 | /r/bestof no longer accepts links from /r/mensrightsIf I may play devil's advocate, there are two problems with differing degrees of severity. The first is...well, differing degrees of severity. This is the weaker of the two arguments; it basically says that we should prioritize whoever is suffering worst - and then attempts to show that women are categorically suffering worse than men. This is generally true, of course, though not as much so as third wave feminists would suggest. Like I said, this is a weaker argument; ideally, everyone could be… | /r/MensRights | 23/07/13 10:37 PM |
| 1 | doesn't get much more absurd than this, fellas.Not if you separate romantic attraction and sexual attraction. In simplest terms, people can be attracted to (in a romantic or deeply platonic way) people who they have no interest in sexually, and vice versa. Assuming the quotes are correct, they could each be described as homosexuals who are either "biromantic" or "heteroromantic". This is not all that different from what is described variously as heterosexual life partners, "bromance", or (via Scrubs) a little married. If you have questions a… | /r/MensRights | 29/05/13 06:01 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter