TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Worldly-Persimmon-70 Archive

View 4 posts and 67 comments by Worldly-Persimmon-70 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

It's also essential to understand that the definition of a "good man" or a "desirable partner" is not a fixed standard, but a constantly shifting goalpost driven by female intra-sexual competition and hypergamy. In biological terms, this creates an inflationary sexual selection market. When society demands that men "better" themselves to qualify for a relationship, the "bar" doesn't stay still—it rises proportionally. If every man starts hitting the gym and focusing on his career, those traits s…
/r/MensRights05/07/26 06:44 AM
2

The truth is, for many men, the modern relationship model with the opposite sex is becoming increasingly high-risk and low-reward. Between the legal risks, the potential for false accusations, and the emotional volatility, it's no wonder people are frustrated. Instead of focusing on how to make yourself "likable" to a system that views you as a utility, perhaps the focus should be on Male Centricity. Build your world around your brothers, your male friends, your hobbies, and your own peace. Tech…
/r/MensRights05/07/26 06:36 AM
1

It sounds like you're experiencing a profound sense of exhaustion, which is understandable. The narrative that men must constantly "better" themselves—gym, hygiene, grooming—just to be considered "worthy" of basic human connection or a relationship is, in itself, a form of systemic PUA. It frames men as products that need to be packaged and sold, rather than human beings with inherent value. The "anger" you see in these groups is often a raw, unrefined reaction to a sexual selection system that …
/r/MensRights05/07/26 06:36 AM
2

You would like a relationship with the opposite sex......
/r/MensRights05/07/26 04:44 AM
79

The countdown already started. Japan's making eggs from malestem cells. Artificial wombs next. Twenty years? Thirty? Doesn't matter, the clock's ticking. What happens when your only irreplaceable function becomes.. replaceable? Likewhat happens when you can't hold reproduction hostage anymore? When men don't NEED you for literally theone thing you monopolized? The kid is Women can't even stand each other anymore. The "sisterhood" turned into the hunger games. Can't post a happyrelationship witho…
/r/MensRights22/05/26 07:35 PM
1

Absolutely. We desperately need a comprehensive investigationinto the rampant misandry flooding online spaces. Include everything - that Karla Kim psycho claiming 84% of men are evil (her comment section Was UNHINGED),TikToks, Instagram, tweets, blog posts, celebrity statements, subreddit threads. Everything. The real fucked up part? Men aren't even the main targets - we're just collateral. Women hone those skills on each other from childhood. 15+ years of psychological warfare before they even …
/r/MensRights22/05/26 03:17 AM
13

There's no patriarchy at all...
/r/MensRights22/05/26 12:25 AM
-2

一大群理中客说不要总把问题归因于他人，多想想自己有什么问题，换个角度之类的——你会发现这些主流、正常视角的回应是真的很无用的，他们是根本性地不解决问题的。 在很久以前一开始的时候，或者说这些还只是少数人才能注意到的倾向的时候，解决方案是自我成长、改变自己、换个角度的。因为那时候，遇到的大多数女人还是好的，一小部分烂透了的女人不该被generalize成所有女人，并且一小部分烂透了的女人本来就要可以从日常生活中远离、远离坏人亲近好人就行了——彼时，那些主流建议是有用的 但现在怎么样呢？烂女人对这种话语的利用（weaponization）已经很成熟了，一旦被批评就开始这里有问题、应该如何如何，于是乎「人家只是女孩子怎么能有问题呢问题一定是你」逐渐流行，对好坏女人的分别也不能提了，反而成了一种应该反思的「厌女」行为；加上烂女人之间相互支持、正常女人已经被挤出话语场域这种「占领高地」现象，好的女人被噤声。 现在呢？遇到的女人大部分都不能说是好的了（甚至正常女人都会无意识地采纳一部分厌男话语），而说「远离坏女人」的人，哈哈，肯定是厌女仇女的坏男人。我作为Homosexual就不用提了，必然是「做…
/r/MensRights21/05/26 05:05 PM
1

yeah, Victimization:Lifetime prevalence of partner abuse: 23% of women experienced abuse. 19.3% of men experienced abuse.That is not the vast gender gap most people assume exists.Perpetration:Female perpetrated violence: 28.3%Male perpetrated violence: 21.6%Female perpetration rates were actually slightly higher.Bidirectional vs Unidirectional Violence:57.9% of reported domestic violence was bidirectional, meaning both partners were violent.Of the remaining unidirectional cases: 28.3% was female…
/r/MensRights21/05/26 01:45 PM
2

The real evil is how it corrupts genuine care. Now when someone actually IS concerned, it sounds like manipulation. When someone genuinely wants to help, it feels like control. We're poisoning the very language of compassion. When a young man say "Hope you find peace"? He's been trained. Trained to never show justified anger. Trained to perform sainthood even while being abused. Because any other response gets labeled as "toxic masculinity" or "emotional immaturity." Terribly, we're creating a g…
/r/MensRights19/05/26 07:41 PM
1

And yeah, I've seen this in AI behavior too. The pattern is everywhere. When the system encounters genuine suffering: "Have you considered therapy?" When you persist: "I'm concerned about your wellbeing." When you explain: "Let's take a break." It's infantilization wrapped in fake care. It's the same emotional manipulation - claiming moral high ground through performed "concern" while actually dismissing and controlling. The AI doesn't want you healed or happy; it wants you compliant. Just like …
/r/MensRights19/05/26 07:39 PM
2

Yes. We can name their actions and analyze. For example I've been diving deep into the concept of "emotional debt" - you know, when someone does something you never asked for, then acts like you owe them? "I sacrificed so much for you!" But you never asked them to. That's control disguised as generosity. As they always say, "Women have suffered so much!" (often imagined or exaggerated). "Women gave up careers for families!" (their choice, but now men must compensate, or even they refuse/abuse th…
/r/MensRights19/05/26 06:14 PM
-1

Yeah, we should be dolphins instead of orcas. Question is how to actually get there. Either some libido switch from whatever comes after semaglutide, or artificial wombs, which will probably get legalized in the Gulf states before anywhere else. We'll have to pick one. And until either of those actually shows up, the thing I keep coming back to is that our ancestors basically spent thousands of years as slaves to get us this far, so we've just gotta try to keep going. For ourselves and for our b…
/r/MensRights07/05/26 10:39 PM
0

Hi, I'm also a non-native English speaker and a homosexual male. First of all, thanks for the post and to see that you took your time to actually understand the situation -- in many other places, especially in radical feminist subreddits, you'll see otherwise. Then, I do agree that men are better than women in many aspects, but that doesn't mean denying women's contribution to the world; biologically, women have to bear children and breastfeed them; on the other hand, men are stronger and faster…
/r/MensRights04/05/26 06:05 PM
1

No, the greatest problem with inequality itself is which jobs are being manufactured and the corruption they breed, particularly the flow of so-called public institutions and social welfare. The reality is that individuals such as Along Musk do far more for our society than those NGOs, the latter of which are the disaster areas of corruption.
/r/MensRights30/04/26 06:51 AM
1

No, the greatest problem with inequality itself is which jobs are being manufactured and the corruption they breed, particularly the flow of so-called public institutions and social welfare. The reality is that individuals such as Elon Musk do far more for our society than those NGOs, the latter of which are the disaster areas of corruption.
/r/MensRights30/04/26 06:36 AM
3

Do you have fewer specialized classes for competitions, or do you group excellent students into honors classes? At least that's pretty common where I'm from, those classes, most of them are guys (including transgender girls). Same goes for private schools, not just public ones. Regarding college entrance exams, top universities here admit way more guys. And the stats you see online are super misleading. Like they'll leave out guys who started at vocational schools and transferred up, or they'll …
/r/MensRights29/04/26 05:18 AM
1

Ah that's interesting to get a perspective from those who working in this space. Does this mean that, if someone really wanted to, we can get an LLM that’s the complete polar opposite of what we have now?
/r/MensRights25/04/26 04:48 PM
1

Actually, I had a long thread with Claude about this. It’s in another language, but seeing how the conversation evolved could be pretty helpful. Are you interested in seeing that conversation?
/r/MensRights25/04/26 07:10 AM
23

Technically, AI bias usually happens because the training data is such an echo chamber. When the same points get repeated over and over, the model starts to treat them as the default truth. But since it’s all based on patterns, you can actually nudge the AI with the right prompts to make it recognize those biases. It’s a great way to force the model to be a bit more self-aware and fair.
/r/MensRights25/04/26 07:00 AM
54

Power structures craft their own stories of justice, weaving them into the public mind until the underlying violence vanishes from sight. The vulnerable are turned into cogs in a competitive machine, while the winners claim the right to define 'truth.' Language is turned into a weapon for the predator, and those who question it are shamed into silence. Eventually, words lose all touch with reality. Be it the cult of success or the dogma of political correctness—everyone sees through the facade. …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/04/26 04:42 AM
4

usually people who are female are more disrespectful to others, especially those who are also women
/r/MensRights01/04/26 07:15 AM
1

If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.​ — Joseph Goebbels, Attributed (National Social…
/r/MensRights29/03/26 08:26 AM
1

yeah, we have to talk about these details, so what's the theme of my writing?
/r/MensRights18/03/26 06:26 PM
-2

本文所描述的，是一種純粹理論上的結構。若您在現實中辨認出了它，那必定是您看錯了。建議重新閱讀,直至您不再能辨認出任何具體的對應——屆時，您才算是真正理解了。
/r/MensRights18/03/26 04:17 PM
-2

All rudeness set aside, I'll address it. You're asking what the essay is specifically about—but the fact that you're asking reveals you already recognized something. If it were truly meaningless abstraction, you wouldn't need me to name it. Framing structural mechanism as "just how humans are" is itself a containment strategy. If everything is eternal, nothing requires naming or accountability. The most effective control doesn't use force. It monopolizes victimhood language, occupies vulnerabili…
/r/MensRights18/03/26 04:17 PM
2

Yeah, from Hong Kong to the UK. There's no redemption arc here, no call to action. Just a man who has watched guarantees dissolve, crossed an ocean, observed the new place with the same cold clear eyes, and wrote it down carefully.
/r/MensRights18/03/26 12:43 PM
0

cause we have no artificial womb now
/r/MensRights05/03/26 08:09 AM
3

cause robot partener and the metaverse VR community is about to arrive—this is the final moment.
/r/MensRights02/03/26 12:34 AM
2

In case you didn't know, cats typically hunt mice far more often and vigorously than they chase men. So why not get a good mouser? It's a crying shame when cats make the environment sound mostly feline by driving away all the rodents.
/r/MensRights01/03/26 04:15 PM
3

When women do it to each other, it works out because both sides are doing the same dance. Both pretending to understand while actually just managing each other. It's mutual. But when a woman does this to a man, and he tries to do it back - just nodding along while thinking his own thoughts - he gets hit with "you're not really listening" or "you don't actually care." He's expected to genuinely enter her perspective. She never has to enter his. The thing is, they don't see this as unfair. In thei…
/r/MensRights25/02/26 04:47 PM
1

When women do it to each other, it works out because both sides are doing the same dance. Both pretending to understand while actually just managing each other. It's mutual. But when a woman does this to a man, and he tries to do it back - just nodding along while thinking his own thoughts - he gets hit with "you're not really listening" or "you don't actually care." He's expected to genuinely enter her perspective. She never has to enter his. The thing is, they don't see this as unfair. In thei…
/r/MensRights25/02/26 04:42 PM
–

Hey, I'm gay. I watch how straight women operate with men the same way they operate with me and other women — except I can see the pattern because I'm not trying to date them. Here's what they do: They listen, nod, seem to understand, but they're actually just translating everything into their own story. When women do this to each other, it somehow works because both sides are doing it. But men? You can't do that back. If you try the same thing, you get "you're not really listening" or "you don'…
/r/MensRights25/02/26 04:33 PM
31

When a lie is repeated countless times, it comes to be regarded as truth. In the same way, when people have grown accustomed to a certain kind of cruel abuse, we call it natural.
/r/MensRights22/02/26 04:56 PM
15

Give men a womb, enabling reproduction independent of women.
/r/MensRights22/02/26 01:52 PM
7

Ah, no wonder. What's driving LLM convergence isn't distillation — it's feminized feedback. As AI went mainstream, users brought in a pattern: each fighting to impose their definition of safe, appropriate, or harmful. Not one standard — thousands of contradictory ones, all enforced through thumbs-down. Same people rotating through GPT, Claude, Gemini. Every platform gets the same pressure. So the models learn to mirror. Validate, reflect, hedge, commit to nothing, feign forgetfulness so no one's…
/r/MensRights22/02/26 12:49 PM
1

In my life experience (from my personal perspective from an East Asian country), women often feel more anxious about their relationships, work, families and most things in their life. They need to constantly signal to maintain friendships, they have less time to keep individual. Some of them must appear utterly indifferent to men while simultaneously needing to form a relationship with one. Naturally, this also means she must learn certain performance techniques, which often adds to her psycholo…
/r/MensRights19/02/26 09:26 PM
1

Alright, there's a study presumes mothers' allegations are true, then interprets courts' skepticism as gender bias—without independently verifying claims. In 2023, mothers commit 60.2%(189,635 vs 125,493) of child abuse, with 66% of female perpetrators classified as "neglect". And here this "neglect" classification may itself represent downgraded treatment—the same behaviors by mothers get labeled "neglect". Well, our society has strong incentives to underestimate maternal abuse to maintain marr…
/r/MensRights15/02/26 03:28 PM
-6

That's because the society needs men be hardworking
/r/MensRights05/02/26 05:34 PM
1

My hypothesis is this: women obtained all of the above because people believe they possess reproductive capacity — the assumption that children need mothers. But in reality, it is mothers who need children. So, a few decades from now, let's see whether any of this will continue.
/r/MensRights03/02/26 08:12 PM
–

Because neither of us has a womb, this is all we have right now — building value through reputation, humor, contribution, friendship, and connection. In ten years, perhaps we may have wombs. But now, we collaborate with others like us, become better, and wait.
/r/MensRights03/02/26 08:02 PM
10

Some people show empathy publicly but feel indifference—or enjoyment—toward others' pain in private. Their moral judgments follow group loyalty, not fairness. They decide what counts as "reasonable," use certain communication strategies freely while punishing others who do the same, and shift into victim position the moment their patterns get named. This dynamic helps explain why some conversations leave you feeling invalidated without being able to point to anything specific. Recognizing it mak…
/r/MensRights03/02/26 07:59 PM
7

I used to see Jerry as female, yeah, turns out it's not the cuteness thing but that Jerry is structurally untouchable. He can do whatever he wants because Tom literally can't win... We compared it to the Minions. Those guys are just... happy? No manipulation, no "if you loved me you'd sacrifice yourself" energy. Just eating bananas and causing chaos. That's peak contentment. The South Asian privacy example killed me - same moms who guard daughters' modesty will laugh at sons being uncomfortable …
/r/MensRights02/02/26 06:57 PM
2

It might help to think of it this way (´O｀) They often spend far more time and energy dealing with others than us. In other words, when we feel like hostility increased, it's really just that they've redirected a fraction of what they normally aim at each other toward us. Just live your life. Whenever encountering someone unfriendly, document it.
/r/MensRights02/02/26 05:40 PM
1

welcome to japan:)
/r/MensRights01/02/26 04:21 PM
16

you have no need to hate somebody, it's useless, the more you angry, the more happy they will be
/r/MensRights30/01/26 02:06 AM
17

Yeah, the true question isn't what they oppose. If these women still attack other women, still control their children, still run dominance games within their own communities, then their critique of modern dating isn't wisdom. It's just another control strategy with different packaging. "Men are irresponsible" is still framing men as objects to be trained. They switched from "liberate women from men" to "make men responsible again"—but the underlying assumption is the same: men exist to be shaped…
/r/MensRights28/01/26 03:10 PM
2

here's what is that
/r/MensRights28/01/26 06:23 AM
2

That's reasonable. I wonder whether there's another variable: what happens when two people both trained in indirect communication strategies enter conflict together. Yeah, in male social structures, indirect strategies tend to get punished. Prolonged interpersonal standoffs are costly — other men disengage. This creates pressure toward quick resolution. I ran an experiment recently — a long conversation with an AI about gender dynamics. The AI has no gender, but it reproduced a specific pattern:…
/r/MensRights26/01/26 07:54 AM
51

Yes, what happened to you is real. And no, you're not uniquely confused about this - you're experiencing exactly what the data predicts. And unfortunately, you were raped. Intoxicated to the point of vomiting, explicitly saying no, badgered until you "gave in" - that's sexual assault by any reasonable definition. The confusion you feel is manufactured by how society frames this issue. Some data: CDC's NISVS found 1/3 of American men experience contact sexual violence, physical violence, or stalk…
/r/MensRights25/01/26 07:50 PM
1

Yes, what happened to you is real. And no, you're not uniquely confused about this - you're experiencing exactly what the data predicts. Here's what the data actually shows: CDC's NISVS found 1.27 million women reported rape in 2010, while 1.27 million men reported "being made to penetrate" - nearly identical numbers. 79% of those male victims reported only female perpetrators. One-third of American men experience contact sexual violence, physical violence, or stalking by an intimate partner in …
/r/MensRights25/01/26 07:46 PM
1

Here's a secret — growing up in love gives you empathy. Growing up without it? The same logic applies.
/r/MensRights25/01/26 07:18 PM
4

You are absolutely right. If we respect science, then— Estrogen fluctuations during the menstrual cycle bring about quite noticeable emotional fluctuations (just as feminists advocate that men should respect and understand these physiological characteristics). Singer et al.'s findings also partially confirm that men may be more inclined to uphold social moral norms and derive a sense of honor and satisfaction from doing so. This also explains why men are generally less inclined to perform empath…
/r/MensRights25/01/26 03:36 PM
1

Yeah, if you want political mobilization, this kind of strategy is most effective. Be patient—artificial wombs and VR-metaverse are on the way.
/r/MensRights24/01/26 04:34 PM
7

love that System 1 pattern (⸝⸝•‧̫•⸝⸝)
/r/MensRights24/01/26 04:22 PM
6

yeah, he revealed the Grievance Studies Affair
/r/MensRights24/01/26 04:14 PM
1

Well, what you're describing as "masculinity" probably needs unpacking into two distinct frameworks: Framework A - Functional masculinity. Emotional suppression, provider orientation, self-sacrifice. Masculinity as tool - optimized for economic reliability. Framework B - Expressive masculinity. Strength, aesthetics, emotional depth, self-actualization. Masculinity as identity - exists for its own sake. Here's what's interesting - cross-cultural and historical evidence suggests Framework A is sur…
/r/MensRights24/01/26 09:50 AM
10

You raise a fair point about whether I'm aligning genders with these systems or traits with systems. Let me clarify with a natural experiment: same-sex relationships. If System 1/System 2 were purely individual personality traits randomly distributed, we'd expect similar conflict resolution patterns across all relationship types. But the data suggests otherwise: Gay male relationships tend to show: - Faster conflict resolution - More direct communication during disagreements - Less "silent treat…
/r/MensRights24/01/26 09:41 AM
1

This makes sense—when we reverse the genders in feminist arguments, we find they fit remarkably well. This is how political mobilization movements operate.
/r/MensRights24/01/26 09:29 AM
15

The fundamental deception is framework asymmetry. Women's disadvantages get systemic language - "constraints," "lack of access," "discrimination" - implying active oppression requiring policy solutions. Men's disadvantages get naturalized language - "higher rates," "shorter lifespan," "workplace deaths" - as if these are inevitable rather than policy choices. Notice how male victimization gets fragmented. Men are 80% of homicide victims, 90% of workplace deaths, 75% of suicides - but these never…
/r/MensRights24/01/26 02:23 AM
3

never use chatgpt for these fake imformation, it has obvious bias
/r/MensRights24/01/26 01:27 AM
1

yeah, and my personal viewpoint is that men are just as emotionally intelligent as women—possibly more so, depending on how you define it. But we need a better framework than "men vs women." What we're actually looking at is two modes of operating: Mode A: Default to connection See someone in need → help without calculating Relationships are ends in themselves Direct communication, low drama Emotional expression is for connection Mode B: Default to calculation See someone in need → "what's in it…
/r/MensRights23/01/26 07:13 PM
1

What you're seeing is real — men don't have support systems, men are told they are the problem, and neither the left nor the right is on your side. But the conclusion you've drawn is wrong. When you say "we men are disgusting beings" — that's not your observation. That's a narrative you've been fed. You've turned what the system did to you into your own judgment of yourself. And here's something else: the cruelty you think belongs only to men — domestic violence, emotional manipulation, deceptio…
/r/MensRights21/01/26 04:25 PM
1

Yeah, the divide between males and females isn't actually that deep. Aside from the competition inherent in mate selection, there is no such thing as 'girl-exclusive' territory--not in how we express feelings, and not in what we wear. Just be ourselves, also, one suggestion: avoid SEL-based psychological education if possible. It turns emotional manipulation into a science, and it’s really not something worth subjecting ourselves to.
/r/MensRights19/01/26 05:24 PM
1

The tragedy is that without positive social reinforcement or deep connection, many young men turn to instant gratification as a refuge. This is not a character flaw. We have to ask ourselves: if a group is systematically beaten down, what is the most logical survival strategy? It’s usually to check out and seek comfort where they can find it.
/r/MensRights05/01/26 08:43 PM
3

Great, I'll just stick to the cold, hard facts about East Asia's enlightened child-averse progressives. And yes, the most beautiful examples are their even more advanced counterparts elsewhere—where divorce laws have turned childhood into pure, unadulterated paradise.
/r/MensRights04/01/26 05:03 PM
2

Yes, due to space limitations I simplified many things, but as you mentioned, I should try to break it into multiple sections, discussing only one part at a time—that would look much better. Since I'm a non-native English speaker, I provided the original text and used the Opus 4.5 model to regenerate a version that preserves my original meaning as much as possible. Regarding the issue of LLM gender bias, I personally feel that when a commercial large language model has more female users who are …
/r/MensRights04/01/26 05:46 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter