TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Worried-Smile Archive

View 0 posts and 411 comments by Worried-Smile on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

That must have filled up super quickly Doesn't matter if it all goes in one hamper or 4 separate ones, same amount of laundry. But yeah, growing up there was one hamper next to the linnen closet. Mom (SAHM) would take it down every other day or so to sort it into different bins in the laundry room for colors, whites, etc. When one of those was full, she'd wash that load.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/24 06:50 AM
6

Unless we know why they're not getting married we don't know if it's a good or bad thing. Being cautious is good reason, not being able to form a deep connection is not.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/24 07:07 AM
6

1) "But it's better than parents constantly arguing". Contrary to popular belief divorce does not mean the parents stop arguing, in some cases it becomes even worse. I don't think anyone believes having a divorce magically stops all arguing, especially not when the terms of the divorce have to be figured out. But it's a matter of fact that after the divorce the parents see each other a whole lot less, simply by not living in the same house anymore. There's so much less opportunity and reason for…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/24 07:01 AM
1

Then you don't get the concepts of pro life and pro choice. If you're pro choice, but in this case would choose to keep the baby, that shouldn't make you pro life.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/24 05:35 PM
-1

You don't want to force people's actions, but if this were an option you'd go from pro choice to pro life. Which would force people's actions.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/24 07:33 AM
-4

Or maybe the assumption that 'because one feminist said so, all believe the same' is ridiculous
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/24 01:59 PM
0

Hi, I'm a feminist and have never heard of Andrea Dworkin.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/24 06:00 AM
3

she is a snowflake unicorn anomaly. She's obviously lying./s (that's what I've been told plenty times on this sub)
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 07:00 PM
1

Same! I don't believe in love at first sight - that's lust - but there was an immediate attraction that turned from purely physical to love over time.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/24 01:20 AM
3

I think this might be a misinterpretation. Many people end up with someone who first was just a friend of them. That's not the same as fake-befriending them just to wait your chance to ask them out. If, in case of a rejection, you disappear from her life, you aren't actually a friend. Besides, women aren't a monolith. I will not apologize for some other women giving wrong/misguided advice.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/24 06:07 AM
4

I would say both working an equal amount of hours and contributing equally to the household IS equal contribution.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 11:50 PM
16

Because the laundry needs to be done now, and every few days in the future. Because you need to cook every day. Not ten (or however many) years ago. For me it's quite simply about who has most time left in their day.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 07:23 PM
7

OP is taking money earned as a starting point for who should do more in the house, I'm taking hours worked as a starting point. My partner and I both work full time. I pay my fair proportional share of the household bills (in in the case of me and my partner that's basically 50/50) and therefore will do about half of the chores, and not more.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 04:11 PM
9

SOLE income, I agree. But my argument is that if both partners work equal amount of hours, just one earns more than the other. If you're in a commited LTR, imo finances should be split proportionally and chores should be split 50/50 in such cases.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 04:00 PM
15

You're in a partnership. Amount of money earned does not always reflect the time and effort put into the work. I'd feel wholly uncomfortable if my partner would do more of the housework if we spend equal amounts of time and effort on our jobs, just because I earn more.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 03:55 PM
14

You're in a partnership. Amount of money earned does not always reflect the time and effort put into the work. I'd feel wholly uncomfortable if my partner would do more of the housework even if we spend equal amounts of time and effort on our jobs, just because I earn more.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 03:55 PM
15

Worth a conversation to be sure - I think it's always a good idea to talk about division of household labour as it can often cause irritations between partners. But where amount of hours worked is pretty clear, physical and mental load is not. I doubt there's many people who think their job is super easy. So hours worked seems like a good starting point.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 02:58 PM
30

Physical and mental drainage is something to take into account, as is time spent commuting. Either way, I think we agree even if the one with the cushy desk job makes more money, doesn't mean the one with the physically demanding job should automatically do more housework because of that.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 02:46 PM
101

How much housework each partner does, imo shouldn't depend on the amount of income they bring in, but the hours they work outside the house. If both partners work full time, then both should contribute equally to the household chores, regardless if one brings home more money than the other.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 02:08 PM
2

if women do feel unsafe or uneasy about men going into the women's restrooms they surely would not want to go into the men's restroom where there's nothing but men that could possibly take advantage of them The women that might feel uneasy about men going into women's restrooms are usually not the same as the women who go into the men's restroom. Additionally, 99/100 it's the women's bathroom which has the huge line. I don't think there's nearly as much need for men to use the women's restroom a…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/24 02:41 AM
2

We're comparing not wanting to have kids with being blind or missing a leg now? One of these is clearly different than the others. Why is it so hard to understand that people have different preferences? Yes, historically most women in relationships had kids. Up until the 1950s, there was no way not to. After that, social norms were still dictating that that was the only thing you should do. We are finally getting to a time where it's ok to ask yourself if you want kids. After all, they have a hu…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 06:17 AM
7

I think plenty people, of which many women, don't want to have kids. That might not be your meaning of a normal life, but guess what: different people want different things in life.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 06:08 AM
3

Omg, someone on a debate sub who doesn't hold the same beliefs as you, shocker!
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/24 12:13 PM
3

So please explain these flaws and show the study you are relying on. I'm excited to learn about it's methodology and why it is should be more reliable.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/24 06:01 AM
9

And you don't see how that could hurt someone? When feelings are involved people can quite easily get hurt
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/24 11:11 AM
19

Have you read your own post? Being honest is better than deceiving people, even if you do not get what you want.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/24 08:04 AM
16

Do you care if you hurt someone who doesn’t want to be used for sex? Everyone should care about this.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/24 07:56 AM
5

Moral grey area. Except for the ghosting after sex, that is 100% bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/24 07:33 AM
26

Men shouldn't lie about wanting a relationship when really they want casual sex. That doesn't mean that if a man says he wants casual sex, the woman will want that too. It's not rocket science.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/24 06:48 AM
7

I'm late twenties and most of my friends aren't married. Most are in LTRs though. Not married doesn't mean single.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 06:21 AM
23

Yet you're asking others if they are married and if the answer is no you see that as proof of your argument. You're not asking others if they are in a committed relationship, you're asking if they are married. You're not married either.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/23 06:19 AM
29

If you're going to disqualify people's opinions because they are not married, maybe start with your own opinion? You're not married either.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/23 06:14 AM
53

She's nice but she's going to be single forever Have you considered that not everyone has the same dealbreakers as you?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/23 05:21 AM
2

Ex boyfriend. It was examples like this that slowly made me realize I could walk over him if I wanted to. That's not healthy, I don't want to have that kind of power over someone. (Currently in LTR with someone who is just as strongwilled as I am.)
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/23 07:41 AM
2

With that said, I'd like to challenge any woman to give a SPECIFIC example of situation where they feel a guy was actually a pushover. Bf: was mad at me for something I did. I don't remember what exactly, but while he did have reason to be upset, he was taking it quite far. me: sheds ONE tear (doesn't say anything). bf: "I'm so sorry, all of this is my fault".
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/23 05:40 AM
74

Onlyfans... all of this is inescapable today. Funny, I have never found myself to accidentally end up on Onlyfans. Pretty easy to escape it if you wanted to.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/23 02:54 PM
–

Id argue its a challenge to a raise a child with both people as well, since the likelihood of divorce is there and the child ending up being raised by a single mother is inevitable. Willingly becoming a single parent is absolutely not the same as the risk of divorce.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/23 06:36 AM
21

It's only a benefit for people who want to seek out those who are too young and inexperienced to realize they are being manipulated.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/23 07:17 PM
1

The other problem with “Nice Guys” is that theyre actually not nice at all. Yeah, for 80% of the 'nice guys' it's an act. "But I was nice to her, where's my sex?!" I would also like to point out the category of men who are actually nice, but literally nothing else. No personality. There's nothing wrong with them, but they will likely not be your soulmate. This applies to friends too, if you would describe someone as 'nice' and no other words come to mind, they are likely not your best friend.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/23 07:43 AM
8

I would reject him because he is redpilled. We have such different beliefs that we wouldn't work out long term. If this guy was blue pilled I'd probably still reject him. I find him quite attractice but I seriously doubt I'd have an intellectual connection to someone who posts shirtless pics for validation every week.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/23 10:08 AM
–

Nope that's not what it means. I enjoy sex because of the sex, no other motives.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/23 03:00 PM
–

I enjoy sex. That is not the same as wanting sex at every moment of every day with any person.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/23 02:49 PM
4

Disagree, both your options mean basically the same: the other has to change. It should be "We tried, but it turns out we are too different and I don't see a future for us".
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/23 06:36 AM
–

The universal declaration of human rights is a pretty decent universal moral understanding. But if you're going to get philosophical about what morality is, why does a religion get to claim morality? Who determines that? Why do you get to say you have the moral high ground over me, simply because I'm an atheist? Why do you get to decide that? I would argue that if a religious person doesn't steal because they're told in their religion it's not allowed and might go to hell for it, that's actually…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/23 05:49 AM
–

Of course sex is a natural want that I think most people experience, both men and women. However, if you realize you are becoming frustrated due to a lack of sex through 'normal' means, it is important to realize that hiring an escort is a possibility. That's all. Sex isn't a resource, even if women do like sex. Everyone gets to pick who they have sex with. If that leaves someone without sex, they have the option to hire an escort, if they want to.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/23 09:29 PM
8

Yeah I hope it's accidental but the use of the word 'hunting' and also 'got their women' really bothers me
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/23 02:28 PM
1

Not everything that is legal is moral. The law and morality are connected, but they are not always the same. It would be impossible for the law to always draw the line of morality at exactly on the right spot, as it depends on many factors. To counter your counter argument: I am not from the United States, that law has no effect where I live. It is also discriminatory based on age (which is illegal in my countries) and anti-democratic, as it takes choice away from the people. I would argue that …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/23 06:39 AM
6

What actually could be done (as many countries do) is to make anonymous sperm and egg donation illegal. This makes it so a child could always contact their parent when they turn 18. A law like that would get rid of your only argument that actually applies only to women who choose single parenthood through articifial insemination, and not to anyone who became a single parent in other ways.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/23 07:52 PM
-1

I think it's because I've always been the more organized person, and he has gotten so used to that over the years that he's almost forgotten to think for himself.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/23 05:15 AM
4

You have obviously not met my boyfriend as that is pretty accurate.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/23 08:49 AM
0

I think one doesn't exclude the other. We should be clear about what we or a specific study identify/ies as sexual violence, but I think it's good that some studies focus on a very broad spectrum of sexual violence, while others take a more narrow approach and only focus on the worst types, like rape. We can recognize that receiving unwanted dickpics is not good, while also acknowledging that rape is a lot worse.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/23 07:19 AM
–

I would like to repeat my previous comment: please don't have kids.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/23 11:54 AM
–

Please don't have kids, if the odds of you being an absent father are 50%
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/23 04:27 AM
11

What do you consider a thirst trap? FAAAR from 85% of women post them, imo.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/23 05:02 PM
5

BY DEFINITION most people can't be special; if everyone is special really nobody is anymore. So you're saying it's ok to treat 9/10 women like crap because they aren't 'special'?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/23 05:01 PM
5

Autism is a spectrum. You are describing one part of it, but definitely not all of autism. Especially not 'borderline' or 'light' autism.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/23 03:36 PM
6

Someone borderline autistic can lead a pretty normal life. My bf has light autism, I've been with him for 6 years now.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/23 05:47 AM
–

Positive reinforcement is great. It goes way too far to expect positive reinforcement for not doing something that is absolutely dispicable behavior and also illegal. Sex is great and beneficial, but not a need.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/23 04:13 PM
–

Yes, these men are heroes for not raping people. Also, congrats on (I assume) not being a murderer and thanks for not robbing an old lady. You truly are a 'nice guy'.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/23 03:34 PM
5

You're saying to not trust any woman here, because we all lie, yet somehow women are the unkind gender here?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/23 01:49 PM
13

This was good advice for opening up in general, not just to women. I don't know what is 'women-approved' about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/23 04:47 PM
0

You can always change your mind about any sort of commitment, at any point. All I'm saying is: do not intentionally mislead people to think there's more than there is.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/23 06:40 PM
1

Sure, it means it can go either way. It does not mean 'I'm pretty sure I'm dumping you after we have sex.' That is being intentionally vague.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/23 06:39 PM
-2

It's not the default assumption. But when you are 80% sure it's not going somewhere, just say that if you're asked.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/23 06:36 PM
1

Hence the word 'or'.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/23 05:37 PM
-4

This is why I intentionally used the word 'intentionally'. If someone asks: "what are your intentions?" And the answer is: "let's just see how it goes", when they know it's probably not going to work, that is using somebody.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/23 05:06 PM
13

thinking they are looking for something deeper than causal sex and then feeling “used” when they don’t get it? why so called sexually liberated women say they love casual sex…but then cry about being “used” for casual sex. These two things are not the same. Please make up your mind. Indeed, women sometimes (naively) have sex with a guy because it means a lot to them, only to find out he doesn't feel the same way. If you are actively lying (think Barney Stinson in HIMYM) or intentionally being va…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/23 04:06 PM
7

Do redpillers not like… go to the mall? Clearly not. I was at an Ikea yesterday. People of all sizes and looks were there happily buying furniture with their significant other. And you can go pretty much anywhere and see similar things. If you only spend time on PPD, you forget that out there in the world most people are in relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/23 07:18 AM
17

husband prefers to leave them by the sink for various reasons Not really 'for various reasons', though. Only one of them actually made sense: I may want to use the glass again. (Then again: you can get a new glass, and it didn't sound like if at a later time he realized he wasn't going to use it again, he'd put in the dishwasher then). The other reasons were 'I don't really care about a glass by the sink'. But he KNOWS that the only way that glass is getting clean is by someone putting it in the…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/23 03:30 PM
4

Women. Not girls. Especially talking about 'young girls' in this context gives a very, very wrong idea.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/23 10:00 AM
6

'She's young and pretty NOW' is just such a terrible motivation to marry someone. If, as a young woman, you know a guy only wants to marry you because you're young and look good, run. You will get older (as will he, but somehow that doesn't seem to matter). If he doesn't love you for your personality, he'll just dump you when you get 'too old'. There's no point.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/23 08:22 AM
3

10 years age difference is a lot, although 21-31 is a much bigger difference than 29-39, due to different phases of life. Personally, the couple with the biggest age difference I know are 29 and 36, which is ok, but already quite a lot imo. For me, I would probably be ok with it if I really loved the guy, but it's not preferred. I like guys that are closer in age to me. My bf is a year younger than me.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/23 06:53 AM
5

Oh god yes. So many men here want a stay at home wife and look down on women with careers. If your wife staying home is part of a joint decision, you don't get to complain about alimony if the marriage falls apart.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/23 08:38 PM
1

She told me early in our marriage she would never leave NJ and I accepted that. I made it clear that moving was not up for debate, her choice was go or stay. Wow that's a dick move. The short answer to my question would have been: "I do what I want and don't respect my wife's wishes", but I got the message anyway. Thanks.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/23 09:07 PM
3

Not at all an answer to my question so I'll ask again (3rd time btw). What if you and your wife disagree on how to achieve a certain common goal? What do you do? An example: your commonly defined goal is financial security and you're looking at buying a house. There are two options. You want to buy a cheap house, that is more remotely located. Your wife wants to buy another house that is more centrally located (closer to the kids' school, amenties, etc), but a bit more expensive. Her argument is…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/23 03:31 PM
16

Especially the type of people here that are purposely looking for that power and want a docile, agreeable wife. I do not trust those people, that's shady.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/23 06:56 AM
7

I don't just mean in this particular case, in general. No way you can talk through everything that will potentially come up in decades time. And even if you discus goals, you can disagree on the best way to reach those goals. What do you do?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/23 11:00 PM
10

You like m stupid so you can boss over them and they don't realize what an asshole you are. Got it.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/23 10:53 PM
10

Ok, fair. But in years of marriage, there is bound to be several disagreements over things that were not talked about in the early stages of the relationship. Or things where you can simply go both ways, but you disagree over which way is best to reach those common goals. Does she just have to give in at the end of the discussion? Do you expect her to not even engage in a discussion and just let you decide?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/23 10:44 PM
12

Why be with me if she does not Because she is a human with a brain who can also make decisions? Why don't you trust her decisions every now and then?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/23 10:40 PM
19

Do you mean a wife should agree with the husbands goals in life, or if they should have the same goals in life? Those are two very different things.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/23 10:39 PM
2

That was OP's point, I was being kinda sarcastic. We have both supported each other through tough times in the past years and will continue to do so
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/23 03:55 PM
2

Didn't say that. But if you're truly so annoyed by people not believing you, maybe don't do it yourself. A bit hypocritical.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/23 01:47 PM
1

You're definitely not the only one to accuse people of lying here. But this is a rather extreme case: instead of saying you don't believe a particular story by a particual person, you say you don't believe anyone with different experiences than you. And if you have disliked people not trusting you, maybe you shouldn't be distrusting people yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/23 11:12 AM
8

Maybe don't come to a debate sub if you automatically believe that anyone that disagrees with you or has a different experience than you is lying. Or actually, maybe go out in the real world some time and find out they are not lying.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/23 08:57 AM
6

I just think it's weird to swear off relationships altogether because he might stop cleaning at some point in time. Not all relationships last, but you have to take a chance because it's worth it. If it does go wrong, you deal with it when that time comes and break up if you have to.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/23 10:18 PM
11

That's your point of reference? Unless I can move out in under 12 hours I'm too invested? If he stopped doing his equal part, I'd have a conversation, like a grown up. And it takes a lot longer than 12 hours for the place to get filthy so I think I'm good with the moving out if I had to.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/23 09:16 PM
9

I really really don't misunderstand you, we just don't agree. If at any point in time we don't make each other happy anymore and break up, that doesn't mean I would've waisted time with him, it just means our time is up.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/23 08:48 PM
9

I don't have kids. I have a career and a LTR. No need to choose. Men (or any relationship for that matter) aren't a good investment, because that's not what's it about. I'm not with my boyfriend because it's a good decision financially. I'm with him because we make each other happy. I have a career because that's a good decision financially. I will always want to be able to take care of myself financially.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/23 08:38 PM
7

You can do both, you know.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/23 08:28 PM
2

Exactly, you can make the redness dissapear, but that skin will not look this smooth irl.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/23 02:31 PM
1

In what way is it said that another study states a different study on a different type of primate showed different results with male monkeys being equally interested in stereotypical girl and boy toys? Why don't you read the study that was linked to me, as I did? Maybe then you'll actually understand my response.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/22 04:30 PM
0

It's not my study or my findings. I only read the study someone provided me and gave my opinion.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/22 01:50 PM
2

it makes every conversation about men and women taboo because you aren’t “allowed” to discuss differences in gender behavior, You're most certainly allowed. But for most things discussed on this sub, it's mostly going to come down to smaller differences between men and women. People can have different opinions and experiences and unless you have hard data to back up a certain claim that 'men do this much more than women', debating it is pretty useless. And that hard data is quite rare.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/22 07:03 PM
3

Almost every single one of I’ve looked at has several methodological flaws and I never even went to college or took any kind of course on research. Lol. The person who admittedly knows nothing about methodology knows when studies are methologically flawed. Sure, Jan.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/22 05:48 PM
4

Ok, was not expecting that. But the study actually quite clearly states a different study on a different type of primate showed different results with male monkeys being equally interested in stereotypical girl and boy toys. The study was an interesting read, but it doesn't really address why this particular type of monkey should be so comparable to humans (as opposed to, for example, this other type of monkey).
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/22 05:35 PM
5

But men do it more!
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/22 04:55 PM
4

Did you forget to switch accounts?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/22 04:45 PM
1

In fact, the same male preference for trucks is also observed in other primate species Please provide me with the source that says any other primate even gives a fuck about trucks, let alone one gender more than the other.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/22 04:41 PM
1

No 401k/ health insurance etc. Only applies to the US.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/22 06:40 AM
1

Those are all assumptions. Content creation, freelance work etc could all easily be a fulltime job. You could even argue that the pressure of having to maintain your followers would be more mentally challenging than a steady 9-5 job.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/22 07:54 PM
1

Why does the way someone earns money even matter? I'd understand your hypothetical post a lot more if the deal was to not earn money at all. I could theoretically quit my fulltime job and go freelance, so I wouldn't have a steady income anymore, but I'd have AN income of my own.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/22 07:43 PM
1

Surely true for some men, but rare and thus in no way a contradiction of my previous comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/22 01:41 PM
4

If no men compromised there would be no relationships Most men don't have unrealistic standards to begin with.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/22 12:21 PM
1

I'm not sure. I value humor but I can't say my partner is exceptionally funny, or that I would want them to be. They are funny and have my type of humor though. Objectively speaking, both my and my partner are very average. What makes it exceptional is how much we love each other and care for each other, how well we know each other, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/22 06:03 AM
6

I personally don't see how someone exceptionally tall, smart, handsome, etc would make me happier or make my relationship better than with my (by many accounts) average partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/22 04:13 PM
7

Is it? I was approached by men 2, 3 if not 4 times my age very often as an underage teenager. I guess it was 'ok' since I had boobs and a butt.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/22 06:05 PM
11

As if underage teenage girls can't have boobs and butts.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/22 04:25 PM
2

Agreed. Disagreeing with each other is normal, and when it comes to your boundaries it should be expressed. If you don't, it will build up frustration. One of the best lessons me and my partner have learned throughout the years is to argue 'properly'; not to dig up old matters, etc. Stay on topic and do it as civilly as possible.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/22 06:47 PM
13

even worse: they're saving women are gross for smoking, but even though they are doing the same thing, they are not cause ItS dIffErENt.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/22 05:07 PM
4

I don’t know any women that’s got double body count figures and only 1 ever has a one night stand. You very probably do, because you don't know the amount of sexpartners of all the people you know. I mean, that's information for closest friends only and even then you probably don't know everything.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/22 05:17 PM
15

Women don't start menopauze at 30.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/22 09:54 PM
5

He repeats his love for math and science a little too often. Great that he has a passion, but this way it kind of feels like that's all he can talk about. Over all his profile is not bad, I have some matching interests and values but I don't think he would be my dream guy, if I were single. Main negatives for me: I live on a different continent and that would be a no-go for me. LDR are hard enough when you already know each other before moving. The non-confrontational thing doesn't work for me. …
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/22 05:41 AM
6

If you aren’t hot and rich, you have to treat women like humans Everyone should. And if you're trying to date them, this should be a 'want to' instead of a 'have to'.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/22 06:46 PM
16

As a woman in her twenties, this is really not as common as you think. Largest age difference out of all the women I know is maybe 8 years. Which is already quite a lot.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/22 01:07 AM
7

One out of like 200. The exception that proves the rule
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/22 10:02 AM
8

If you want to see this as evidence for anything, it's that cold approaching barely ever works. Most met organically, through friends, school, work etc, or online.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/22 08:05 AM
23

Likes don't mean they have similar experiences.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/22 08:03 AM
2

Absolutely not. Just think of the numbers. How many of the women will be in relationships? How many will be freaked out by you approaching them? How many will not be interested in dating? Be gay? Not have time to talk to you? Not be attracted to you? Etc, etc. Many more women will be freaked out by you randomly approaching them, than there'll be women you actually have a shot with. If you're comfortable with willingly doing that, I can add that to the list above with reasons not to date you.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/22 07:00 PM
4

Women who are less picky won't see the need to pay.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/22 06:29 PM
7

'Emotionally invested' can mean different things during the course of the relationship. I hope that from the moment you agree to a second date, there'll be at least something like 'I'm excited to see them again' and that you'd be a little sad if they end up cancelling. Otherwise, why date them?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 08:44 AM
32

It is unwise to date anyone you are not emotionally invested in. That's kind of the point.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/22 06:55 PM
2

You don't have to compete with the top few percent of men with big penises that know how to please women with fingers and tongue. Just caring about what the woman wants in bed and making sure she is satisfied already puts you ahead of a big group of men.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/22 06:31 AM
1

Yes they can, but many don't. So many men think PIV is the main event, and they'll stop once they've orgasmed without thinking twice about the pleasure of the woman. Being good with your fingers and tongue and making sure she is pleased will more than compensate for this. Also: there is such a thing as a dick that's too big and it hurts. PIV also hurts without proper foreplay.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/22 06:17 AM
9

We're talking about early stages of dating here. Why in the world would a woman clean the house of a guy she's dating? Why would anyone clean a house they don't live in (unless they were a maid)? I absolutely do not agree with you. The level of 'wifey' acts you expect entirely outweigh the level of 'manly' acts you expect. (And I believe in equality. Split the bill, split chores, etc.)
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/22 05:28 AM
8

No one HAS to do anything. Do you just mean cooking for a date or what? For some women, cooking a nice meal sounds like a fun date. For others not. I don't get what the big deal here is.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/22 05:19 AM
5

Ok so now 'financial providing' has been reduced to 'paying for dates', can you elaborate on what you mean by 'wifey behavior'?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/22 05:07 AM
1

I think you see both in pretty equal amounts overall. But neither of us can prove what percentages of women and men do this, so this is a discussion without an end. Can we just agree that no one should blame an entire group for the actions of one person belonging to that group, and call it a day?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/22 04:53 AM
5

Yeah they do.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/22 04:26 AM
8

I feel like this is just your mental gymnastics to make it ok to lie and intentionally hurt women. It's not ok to manipulate and lie, doesn't matter if you've been hurt in the past.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/22 08:30 AM
1

That depends on when they realize it. I would say that if someone has most things you're looking for, but not everything, to try to date them anyway. Just to see if what you thought was so important actually is in practice, or maybe it's not so bad after all. Doing that goes against your view of never settling. But please also respond to the rest of my previous comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 04:31 AM
3

That's an assumption. The 'fat loser' might just as well resent women or the world for not getting what he wants, or he might resent being single more than he would resent what he didn't get. He might grow as a person and realize someone's personality is more important than their weight. Look, everybody is allowed any standard they want, no matter how ridiculous. But having more realistic standards would definitly be better for everyone.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 04:17 AM
6

Please don't ever ask that.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/22 11:07 AM
10

Young american men aren't unique in these problems. So why don't shootings happen elsewhere? Because American guys have access to guns. (That is not to say that we don't also need to find solutions for the reasons that lead up this, like better mental health care.)
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/22 07:03 AM
8

It is 1000x easier to find a relationship/get women than to become famous. Majority of the people worldwide can manage to find a relationship at some point in their life. An absolutely tiny % of people will become so famous that women throw themselves at them with 0 effort required. I have read a lot of really stupid posts on this sub, but this one might take the cake. Congratulations.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/22 09:36 PM
1

That I'm just at a coffee shop to get coffee. I'm at a party to talk to people. Plus I'm surrounded by people I know, which makes me feel safer if you turn out to be a creep (which is less likely)
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/22 06:48 PM
1

People before our generation didn't meet through friends, family or in college? Which still are much more common ways of meeting a partner than online, btw
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/22 05:53 PM
2

No need to tell me. Being a woman I am reminded of that every day. I personally would care if what I did would make others uncomfortable. Clearly I am alone in that.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/22 05:21 PM
1

I think the chances of you meeting your dream woman through cold approaches are close to zero, and therefore not worth making people feel uncomfortable for.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/22 05:05 PM
2

At the expense of the comfort of the people you're approaching? I'd prefer it if strangers wouldn't approach me and I know I'm far from alone in that.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/22 03:29 PM
6

Cold approach works for confident/funny/charming, good looking people. Even if you fit this description, it only works every now and then. Out of the women you approach most will be in relationships, not have time to talk to you, not want to talk to you, not be attracted to you, not like your personality, be gay, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/22 03:04 PM
17

OP sure doesn't lack confidence. Just self-awareness.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/22 02:59 PM
1

How often do you actually talk about people's personal finances and how much they earn, though? People might see my bf paying the bill when we go out for dinner, but they don't see that's a common account that I contribute more to.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/22 03:29 PM
3

I'm not opposed to it in principle, but I don't think it would work in practice. You wouldn't want to create a system where men could sleep around not using any protection, and when they would get a woman pregnant, simply get a financial abortion and be done with it. So: it would make sense you could only have a financial abortion if proper protection was used, but failed. But having to prove you used protection would be impossible. Additionaly, there should probably be a time limit. It would ma…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 06:17 AM
1

Source
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/22 04:54 AM
3

"Tell me you never actually talked to a feminist without telling me you never actually talked to a feminist."
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 08:44 PM
12

also just stay away from woman who look like feminists (you can usually tell lol) Under the age of 30, 68% of American women consider themselves feminists. There's no way you are accurately avoiding all of them.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 06:25 PM
14

The last thing I want to do is erode her boundaries where she doesn't want them eroded The wording you used (especially "got her to go skinny dipping"), definitely sounds as if this was not only your idea, but you had to convince / encourage her to do it, perhaps to the point she felt pressured. Maybe this was only a poor choice of wording, but maybe you need to reflect a bit if you did respect her boundaries as much as you think you did.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 06:50 AM
3

Congratulations, you are slightly better than people that actively call women out for having sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 06:50 PM
5

You are free to date someone with an equal amount of sexual partners as yourself. You choose not to. How do you not see you're contributing the stigma you say not to like?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 06:40 PM
5

t’s a sad truth about society, but it is what it is. Except you're also clearly contributing to this stigma by having a high N-count yourself, but not wanting a woman who had an equal amount of sexual partners. That is hypocritical.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 06:29 PM
1

Sure: there are plenty of differences in cultures in regards to the traits we assign to a gender. But it's not like men who stay home with their children are considered women. I doubt you'd find cultures THAT different, that ones behavior would be identified as a woman in one culture, and the same behavior identified as man in another.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/22 08:01 AM
0

wouldn't it make gender subjective? As in, one culture would consider you a certain gender, and another would consider you as a completely different one. Theoretically: yes. But our world has become pretty globalized, I doubt you'd be able to find cultures that are so radically different from one other. Biologically speaking, men and women have different body parts. Anything gender-related other than that, is socially constructed. Why men don't wear skirts, why only women wear heals and make-up,…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/22 07:14 AM
1

I honestly find this quite insulting and intolerant. You already say you think my beliefs are pretty set. They are. I grew up religious and spent years evaluating my thoughts and feelings about it. I came to the conclusion that I don't believe in any of it. I would never tell you to 'look at the science and reconsider your beliefs' or something like that. Religious freedom and tolerance is a two-way street.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/22 03:25 PM
1

To me it's just a book about people and things I don't believe in. I do not intend to live my life by it, simply because others who do believe in it feel the need to force it upon me.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/22 02:52 PM
1

Totally not comparable, obviously. There are plenty proper arguments why murder is rightfully illegal. Religion, on the other hand, only has one: 'because this book said so'.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/22 02:36 PM
2

While I'm no fan of porn since I'm a Christian and would ideally like to see it banned world wide, Slightly off topic but I will never seize to be amazed by religious people who want to ban something for everyone because it isn't in line with THEIR personal beliefs. How about you don't watch porn yourself and let the rest of us make their own decision.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/22 02:02 PM
4

Funny how you're so focused on women that cheat, when your numbers show that in history, it's always been men that cheat more often, except for now, but only in one age group. Also, a lot of your sources are ridiculously outdated. 1953, come on.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 09:08 AM
1

Be my guest.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/22 03:47 PM
8

But, can you get a man to commit and, god forbid, marry you? That's a much bigger and more difficult feat,meh? Yes. Been in a LTR for over 5 year now. Literally all of these things are opinions and not everybody agrees with them. They are not facts, they are not the universal truth.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/22 07:53 AM
4

This is an opinion piece from a conservative platform, not facts. Please don't confuse the two.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/22 07:33 AM
4

People are getting more divorced now than decades ago because now that is less stigmatized. Because fewer people are financially trapped in marriage. Not because marriages on average are less happy. And I do not agree with your statements that your other claims are common knowledge. So without sources backing up your statements, there really is nothing to discuss.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/22 04:31 AM
7

Marriage rates declining is not the same as people not being in long term relationships. For the other things you're claiming: I'd like to see some sources.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/22 04:20 AM
3

"In one shocking statistic, the CCDH found that Instagram didn’t act on 90 percent of abuse sent via direct message to the women in this study, despite the messages being reported to moderators" How do you read this and, instead of blaming instagram or the people who send abuse, come to the conclusion that women should just stay off social media if they don't want this?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/22 12:03 PM
2

You haven't linked the article so I can't comment on that. But: even though 'assholes gonna asshole', that doesn't mean platforms like instagram don't have an obligation to make sure their communities are safe and people on there comply with the law. Ahead of time seems somewhat unrealistic though.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/22 11:39 AM
4

it is unreasonable to expect all those comments to be to your liking. Again: no one EXPECTS that. You paint a very black/white picture: either you post nothing (or to a very small circle) or you have absolutely no right to complain about what people comment, no matter how vile. A certain amount of criticism or less than friendly comments are to be exptected. But that doesn't mean that one does to have the right to speak up against horrible comments.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/22 09:38 AM
2

This is stupid. Someone's got to make the first move, so in every relationship one person does not find the other that attractive because they didn't make the first move? There are plenty reasons why someone does not make the first move no matter how attracted they are to someone.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/22 01:59 AM
5

I'm not speaking of this family (that I don't know) specifically. Really, I wish them all the best. But having to work on your parents farm (or else there won't be food?) and having to take care of your younger siblings does not seem like a good life to me. More generally speaking, the parents choose to have many kids, often due to religious beliefs. The kids don't have a choice in this. As a parent, you should be wanting to create a good life for your children. I would never say that poor peopl…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/22 08:17 AM
8

Honestly, I think it's morally wrong to plan to have so many kids that you can't properly take care of them and they grow up in poverty.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/22 07:55 AM
5

Usually it's not going to be as either/or as the question you're asking. There's a large grey zone where people aren't exactly sure what they would like before the date. If a woman is absolutely sure she isn't interested in the man, than I do think it's wrong to go out to dinner with him and have him pay. But I think situations where the woman thinks she isn't that into the guy, but just wants to see how the date goes, is much more likely. Since getting to know each other better is the point of …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/22 06:34 AM
3

yes
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/22 06:21 AM
16

The modern idea that you can’t have 12 kids is ridiculous. You're not exactly selling it though. Why would anyone want to live like that?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/22 06:16 AM
8

the most poetic declarations of admiration, I wouldn't consider that catcalling. Catcalling: " the act of shouting harassing and often sexually suggestive, threatening, or derisive comments at someone publicly" (Merriam Webster dictionary
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/22 06:00 PM
18

When, in the history of humanity, did catcalling EVER lead to a hook-up? The two are entirely unrelated.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/22 05:29 PM
8

You're paying Tinder for their platform. You're not paying a woman for sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 01:26 PM
28

You should have a look at r/relationshipadvice. Many, many people need that advice and it's definitely not just women. (and about 80% of the posts there would not exist if the couples actually communicated)
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/22 04:41 PM
1

if you don’t you end up blue haired, overweight and communist You can't convince me you're not trolling. This is hilarious.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/22 01:07 AM
6

That's not the point here. None of our preferences are genuinely unique. They are formed by the society around us.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/22 05:53 PM
34

This rant is kind of pointless. Yes, the looks and personality traits we value are socially constructed. No more so for women than men. In other news: water is wet.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/22 05:02 PM
14

Despite what women say, the majority of Men are NOT rapists or serial killers. No one says that. We just have to be really careful to avoid the few.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/22 02:21 PM
2

Thank god! With this sub you can never be sure..
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/22 12:16 PM
4

Please say you're being sarcastic. If not: if his dick is all that matters, dump her and go find another woman, preferably an escort, but also sex workers should be treated with respect.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/22 12:14 PM
6

That's just being a decent human being. Don't need redpill to realize it's naive to think that if you treat a woman with respect, she'll automatically fall in love with you.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/22 11:50 AM
6

I'm curious. What exactly are the outcomes that society said he should be getting?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/22 11:40 AM
9

I suggest marrying a barbie doll, since looks seem to be all you care about. 20 year olds don't stay 20 forever.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/22 08:43 PM
3

Like always, more nuance is needed. I agree that you shouldn't complain about women not finding you attractive if you don't spend any time or effort into how you look. But that doesn't mean you should only be allowed to complain about it if you've tried literally everything and anything to look better. A little effort, like dressing well and a good haircut, can go a long way. But there are plenty things about looks that cannot be changed. People have a right to complain about their misfortunes i…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/22 10:48 AM
4

Rubbing the clit during PIV is indeed usually easier done by the women. But for many women, PIV is not the main event of sex. I suggest taking some time to rub the clit and eat her out. Highly appreciated by most women (and I honestly thought that was common knowledge by now).
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/22 08:20 AM
3

Could she have communicated to her partners better? Yes. But vaginal orgasms are pretty rare, most women cum much more easily from clitoral stimulation. Had her partners actually cared about her orgasms, they would tried that.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/22 08:05 AM
9

Honestly, for me they proved to be quite unimportant. When I met my LTR BF, I wasn't actively looking for a relationship. I hadn't really thought much about my preferences at all. I've never really had 'a type' of guy that I liked. Then I met my bf, fell in love, and that was that.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/22 08:14 AM
–

but yeah probably around 30% just wouldn't register as an option. That's their choice though. It's not their choice to be ignored by you. It's your choice to ignore them. Now, that might be related to their choice to look a certain way (for the part that it is their choice), but there is a difference between those two things.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/22 10:52 AM
–

Obesity definitely isn't always a choice. But I'm mostly confused about why you think specifically YOUR opinion is something that people should cater to. You're giving yourself too much credit. There are always people that will not be attracted to you, no matter how hard you try. You can be a supermodel and there will still be plenty of people like "meh, I prefer blondes". That's not the model's fault or problem. You can't cater to everyone's preferences, nor should anyone try.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/22 10:20 AM
–

That's their choice though. It's their choice that they are invisible to YOU?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/22 09:55 AM
2

Ok didn't expect that, that's pretty good actually!
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/22 03:45 PM
2

No 'if', freezing is real and there's plenty of science to back that up. Plenty people already know about this, so I don't think it's unreasonable for everyone to know this either (ideally included in sex education, or something). No need to be a mind reader though, I don't know about you but I would definitely notice if the person I'm kissing or having sex with would just stand or lie there and not actively participate. It's not rocket science.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/22 01:04 PM
1

If someone genuinely believes they are reading all the signals right, leans in for a kiss but the other backs away, that's one thing. It can happen, but it should be rare. It indeed doesn't necessarily mean that someone is traumatized for life (which is not at all what I said, you're exaggerating my point with intent to ridicule it). But if you're not sure if you're seeing the right signals and you're going for it anyway, that shows disrespect of the other persons boundaries. Caring that little …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/22 11:18 AM
1

I guess it can help, but since consent can be revoked at any given time, definitely not perfect.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/22 11:00 AM
0

You ask, and when she says 'yes', you learn that you interpreted her body language right. You don't just go for it and hope you were right.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/22 10:59 AM
2

You know consent can be revoked at any time?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/22 10:54 AM
3

Body language isn't difficult to read. And one comment later you say that you also misread signals a few times. Imo: sometimes signals are super clear and asking isn't necessary. Sometimes they're not so clear. Some people are better at reading body language than others. In case of doubt: ask.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/22 10:53 AM
5

Freezing is real.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/22 10:47 AM
3

My comment or the post?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/22 09:38 PM
11

Prostitution is perfectly legal where I live. Guess what: people are still in relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/22 07:30 PM
29

Are you saying you'd rather be with a woman who is with you only because you're her only option and she's financially trapped in a relationship with you?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/22 04:32 PM
3

If that's a mutual choice, I agree. Since here it was a reason to break up, it's clearly not.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/22 08:06 PM
8

Yeah I don't know how but somehow almost all men on this subreddit are worse than most men I've ever met in my life.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/22 06:24 PM
11

My flair used to say I'm a woman. It doesn't anymore. My opinions haven't changed, but SOMEHOW I've gotten a lot less mean responses.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 06:50 PM
11

What are you even doing on a debate sub?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 06:42 PM
1

Illegal where I live (which I am happy about).
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 04:51 PM
4

You fucking females will tell deformed men that it is their personality, demonizing them as a human being in the vilest ways possible when deep fucking down you knew it was looks and that you were a shallow fucking slut anyway. But with such a lovely personality, who wouldn't want to date you? /s
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 06:04 PM
8

I would say yes, scenario 1 is salvageable. I seriously doubt it. He's over and over making the decision to spend time with her, because he has feelings for her. Being found out doesn't change that. I don't think I could trust someone who chooses to date someone behind my back ever again. He could say he'd stop seeing her, but he lied about that before so can you trust that? Honestly, I am more likely to eventually forgive in scenario 2, as it's ONE really stupid decision, not continued betrayal…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/21 07:12 AM
1

1 is worse. Two is one REALLY stupid decision, but the first is a continued violation of my trust, even if it doesn't involve sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/21 07:04 AM
6

Pill caused migraines so now I have the nexplanon implant in my arm.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/21 07:30 AM
1

Sure you can still learn little things about each other after many years, but that doesn't mean you don't know how to surprise your SO.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/21 04:26 PM
2

I would assume if you're married to someone you actually know them, and know what they like. Both in general and for example what looks they like on you. Like to dress like you'd be going on a date, perhaps wear her favorite cologne and do something nice for her.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/21 02:56 PM
0

I don't intend on becoming a SAHM. I think we couldn't afford to have one parent not work, but if we could, I'd had no issue with my bf being that parent, if it's something he'd want. More ideally though: I want a relationship where all tasks, including parenting, is a much as possible divided. I want a world where daycares and schools don't automatically call moms when there's an issue. Where it's also ok for dads to take time off work to care for children. Where dads don't refer to taking care…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/21 07:52 AM
1

It mentions a survey, without even linking or naming it. The study itself not being published isn't exactly a good sign either.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/21 09:50 PM
2

All this talk about a source, yet you still haven't given it to me. Either do and we can discuss it further or we're done.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/21 09:07 PM
2

Yeah I found a 'study'. It said 20% of women have back up partners, but even so I could easily point out several flaws in the study or why it is irrelevant. But as you said, this is reddit, so why bother explaining?!
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/21 08:59 PM
3

Numbers don't mean shit if you don't provide a source. You should know that. I treat them like that until you prove me otherwise. You want to use numbers for your argument, not me.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/21 08:42 PM
3

If you don't provide a trustworthy source, why should I believe it? Or take the time to factcheck?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/21 08:29 PM
2

You spread bullshit numbers, I give a bullshit answer.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/21 08:17 PM
7

Sure, Jan.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/21 06:54 PM
11

Yeah I agree with you. Dating multiple people is all perfectly fine in early phases, but once you're actively trying to build a serious relationship it's quite counterproductive. In response to OP about women's backup plans: I definitely don't have a plan B, C etc (and I've never heard of friends that do either). At most, I've thought about what to do if my LTR would end just a few times.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/21 06:12 PM
5

A very lively and vivacious person. Person A because of this. B doesn't seem to really have much of a personality. All the other things mentioned come second to someone actually being a nice and fun person.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/21 04:40 PM
2

It makes the list, sure, but I think using protection is a more realistic alternative.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/21 08:49 PM
2

No one is pro abortion. We are pro choice. Everything should be done to prevent unwanted pregnancies, abortions should only be a last resort.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/21 08:14 PM
4

Very rarely just when seeing someone. But more generally: yes, every now and then.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/21 07:53 PM
25

Have you considered that you never had those feelings because you're really young and there's many things you've never experienced?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/21 07:38 PM
3

More screenshots and 8 year old comments as well. If you have to dig that deep to find something to support your argument..
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/21 07:35 PM
20

You think love is a joke? It's not love, it's early stages of dating. You have an initial connection with someone and are exploring if there could be love and a long term thing. Not so hard to like two people at once like that. Do you think it's absolutely fair to reject a person and then reapproach them It's shitty to be someone's second choice. But what is so bad about letting the guy make that choice for himself? He can reject her. He could also just understand that he was leaving and not min…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/21 06:41 AM
3

Didn't mommy teach you that staring is rude? Yeah it's a free world. You can do all sorts of things that most people would find rude. Doesn't mean you should. Ever went up to an ugly person to tell them how ugly they are? You can do that, no laws against it. But it's common decency to NOT do that. Also, the question was about complimenting private parts, not the staring.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/21 09:32 AM
2

If only men only stared at my boobs if I wear something low cut. Oh wait, I never wear something that shows cleavage yet men stare all the time.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/21 08:43 AM
11

If you really can't see the difference between 'nice tits' and 'you're beautiful', there's no point in discussing this at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/21 09:54 PM
8

I've had that happen and it was weird. You don't give a compliment unless you've given that something a good look. A quick glance at someone's boobs or bum is sort of ok, but anything longer than that isn't. Complimenting boobs or bums is admitting you were staring.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/21 09:49 PM
12

This sub AHEAD? I guess that depends on what kind of society you live in then. I never come across people as conservative as in this sub irl. I also know I am a minority in this sub.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/21 08:10 PM
15

A man taking on women and children as his self is quite the fucking burden. A woman being reduced to 'wife of' and no longer being her own self (since apparently the husband is that now) doesn't sound particularly appealing either. Can we just agree this crazy fundie stuff is outdated?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/21 07:34 PM
4

Me? There's no underwear standard for men. Why am I not surprised?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/21 05:59 PM
3

When a woman wears a skirt or dress, sometimes it happens that her panties are visible; Unless the skirts are way too short, how? Anyway, it's not unheard of for dress codes to contain standards for undergarments. Is it? I've never heard of it. Even if you do get a choice of two, you don't mind your employers knows what kind of underwear you wear? That you don't get to pick what material you prefer? That you don't get to pick the model that's most comfortable for you (there's many more than 2)? …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/21 05:45 PM
6

That makes no sense. Rules about dressing professionally, sure. But why would they make rules about what's underneath and not even visible? Pretty fucked up.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/21 05:21 PM
7

First wear a thong yourself, then make judgements on how (un)comfortable they are. You don't have a clue what you're talking about. Seriously, it's nothing like a wedgie. They're very comfortable and I much prefer them over other types of underwear.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/21 11:56 AM
2

??? I was literally asked about my feelings. Calm down.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/21 07:58 AM
1

I would disagree with that statement, but whatever. I am not other women and cannot be held responsible for what other women do or say.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/21 07:44 AM
3

I honestly wouldn't know. But if I can't predict my feelings in a completely hypothetical situation, I doubt a strange man on the internet who doesn't know me can.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/21 07:41 AM
6

I don't. I am financially independent from my bf and I have every intention in the world to keep it that way. Also, there is a big difference between taking care of the kids and the household vs literally doing nothing, as was the premise here. If I would earn enough for the both of us and he'd want to be a stay at home dad, I'd be perfectly fine with that.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/21 07:39 AM
4

I contribute 50% financially and do 50% of the household. But that's not the main reason my bf is with me.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/21 07:30 AM
3

Because you can love someone and still realize things aren't working out between the two of you.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/21 07:27 AM
1

Yes. I'd be very annoyed with him. I definitly wouldn't pay for him to do literally nothing for 3 years. I honestly might break up with him, but not because of a lack of love.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/21 07:17 AM
6

It's only an act of love if you actually love your partner. All of these things (who does the cleaning, cooking, work) come second to finding someone you love. You're not with someone because they cook for you (I hope). I also love it when my boyfriend cooks for me, but it's not the reason I love him.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/21 07:08 AM
11

Not to mention that most people are in relationships because they love someone and want to spend time together, and to emotionally support each other. Not because (pulls out calculator) 'the time she spends on cooking and cleaning is roughly equal to the money I bring home by working'.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/21 06:39 AM
8

I see no reason to be exclusive to a partner who can't or don't want to provide the same for me This is the main reason for me. I can get polyamory or open relationships, as there the lack of monogamy is equal. Hard pass on my guy being with multiple partners but I'm not allowed to do the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 07:32 AM
2

girl that doesn't care about her appearance It all depends on what exactly you mean by this. Does this mean no full face of make-up every day? Easy enough. But on the other end of the scale, a girl (or any person) who REALLY doesn't put any effort into their looks (unwashed, uncombed hair, bad clothes, etc), is unlikely to be considered 'naturally beautiful' by anyone.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/21 08:39 AM
7

I think you're misunderstanding me: 50/50 is the goal, not the minimum. But men 'not having a problem being around their kids' is not at all the same as them shouldering 50% of the care of said kids.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/21 07:02 AM
15

A lot of men have no problem being around their children I would hope that everyone understands that if you do have a problem being around kids, maybe don't have kids yourself. What you're describing is the bare minimum, not 50%.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/21 01:06 AM
5

Obviously a date is not a lifetime commitment.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/21 08:59 PM
8

That clearly depends on what you see as traditionalism. In my opinion, if you are looking for a woman who will stay at home with the kids and will do the household, while you are working, that is a pretty damn traditional relationship. A woman who wants to have a relationship like that will likely expect a man to pay for the date, as that is logical for a more traditional relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/21 08:54 PM
12

Ok: there are women who aren't traditional, but do enjoy it if a man pays for the date. But I really don't get your argumentation. If the goal is to date traditional women, not paying for the date seems like a pretty good way to scare off any traditional woman from wanting to keep on dating you.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/21 08:46 PM
3

So wrong.. Most cases would be middle ground.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/21 12:43 PM
9

Agreed. Seems like many people here think that there are only two options: 1: never show any emotion 2: lay all your serious trauma out there on date 2 (and expect them to support you through it all). If a woman says to show more emotion, she doesn't mean option 2. Obviously, supporting eachother is essential in a relationship, but there's only so much a partner can do if their SO refuses to seek the help they need.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/21 12:16 PM
1

As someone else here said: it's a lot about a comparable history. Knowing how much I've learned from previous relationships, Im more interested in someone who also had those kinds of experiences. I can imagine people with extensive dating experience could be intimidating for you and you'd actually prefer someone also less experienced.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/21 02:45 PM
0

Partially, yes. But someone can fall in the 'ideal' range of sexual partners without having had a serious relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/21 09:29 AM
1

It's not really the amount of sexual partners that would matter to me, maybe more the experience in relationships ifself. If someone is 30 and has never been in a serious relationship, I would consider that a bit of a red flag. Usuually first relationships are very educational, they teach basic relationship skills like communication. Hopefully they've learned a bit from any mistake they've made and they usually know much better what they are looking for in a relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/21 09:07 AM
2

It's not really the amount of sexual partners that would matter to me, maybe more the experience in relationships ifself. If someone is 30 and has never been in a serious relationship, I would consider that a bit of a red flag. Usuually first relationships are very educational, they teach basic relationship skills like communication. Hopefully they've learned a bit from any mistake they've made and they usually know much better what they are looking for in a relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/21 09:07 AM
2

Whereas your source is...?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/21 03:58 PM
2

If a man sucks at Tinder they say "well approach in person". Women wouldn't really say that. Because it can be quite terrifying and is mostly unwanted. "I have a boyfriend/I just came here to dance with my friends!". Well yeah, if you approach people in a club, not everybody is going to be interested in you too. Deal with it. I personally have no issues with anybody using the services of sexworkers (although it depends a bit on the country etc. because it can be exploitative). If it's not: you d…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/21 03:41 PM
2

Some might, many don't, according to lesbian friends. Also scissoring is a porn-only thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/21 03:35 PM
7

Yeah definitely depends on the country. Living in Sweden was awesome for that, hardly any approaches.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/21 03:32 PM
1

Lesbians literally strap themselves with giant, plastic penises to fornicate with other lesbians Don't mistake lesbian porn for reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/21 03:28 PM
11

If she’s kissing other women it’s probably because she’s trying to arouse a man (or men). Of course women can't just kiss other women for fun, or just to try it out. Everything we do is to attract men. /s.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/21 12:35 PM
–

it's just statistically and biologically true. Feel free to share those 'statistical and biological facts' with me to prove me wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/21 08:44 AM
–

You must live in such a bubble if you truly believe that (given the possibility) all men want the same. Or just arrogant that you really think all men must want what you want. It's never like that. 100 different people want pretty much 100 different things in life. You might be able to generalize a bit that a small majority might want similar things, but that's about it. The basic premise of your discussion (women want this and men want that) is so wrong, that there is no point in discussing the…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/21 08:36 AM
–

That's a whole lot of generalizations, stereotyping and presumptions you are making to get to 'men's ideal dating strategy' and 'womens ideal dating strategy'. Especially the male one, I doubt even 30% of men would actually see that as an ideal.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/21 08:26 AM
8

It was horrible between the ages of 12-18. Your entire comment is very relatable, but especially this. The amount of times men 3-4 times my age would make inappropriate sexual comments to me when I was 14... Only now I fully realize just how seriously fucked up that was.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/21 04:59 PM
18

As a curvy woman, it's quite annoying. I can be covered from head to toe in clothes, but unless I'd dress in a burlap sack, my curves are showing. And men stare all the time. I do my best to ignore it, but it's hard.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/21 12:58 PM
2

I am really not an outlier within feminism. There's plenty women like me. Did you know that r/askfeminists considers FDS a hate sub and doesn't allow their users to post?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/21 05:40 AM
1

Liberation for all Or for none Except RP still holds on to old fashioned standards for women, like demanding virginity. So either they are hypocritical like FDS, or they still want to live like the 50s in general.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/21 05:11 PM
2

Yeah but where rp would disagree with the 'not offering traditionalism', I disagree with the 'demanding traditionalism'.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/21 05:00 PM
3

This is based on limited time there, so correct me if I'm wrong. Their term 'queendom' makes me want to vomit. It's mainly the 'I'm a strong independent woman, but you need to carry my bags and pay for the date'-vibe. As a feminist, I will always insist on paying half. I honestly would not want to go on a second date if he wouldn't let me pay half. I can carry my own bag, I'm not weak. That's what being independent means to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/21 04:58 PM
1

Not liking FDS is maybe the ONLY thing RP and I have in common. Just not for the same reasons.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/21 04:27 PM
2

Either way, main point was that people here are always so obsessed with finding differences between men and women. Why always think of men as a unity and women as a unity (which you did, even if you might accept there are exceptions). Regardless, I don't think your 'experiment' proves anything. It proves that some of your male friends' picture of a woman is on average closer to the average percentage of fat of the average woman, than the picture of your female friends is of the average man. Attr…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/21 08:06 PM
2

For once, can we just stop with the 'all men do this' and 'all women do that'. It NEVER works like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/21 07:41 PM
9

As long as men avoid the worst atrocities, I'm good. They don't have to be top 10% best dressed, just not the worst 10%.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/21 02:02 PM
1

I wasn't aware that only Americans are allowed to have opinions op PPD. Why disqualify mine based on where I lived? Obviously there are cultural differences, but they are not nearly as big as you think.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/21 02:00 PM
2

That's you. One anecdote doesn't prove anything. Right. As opposed to your statement which was entirely supported by scientific data, of course. /s
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/21 01:42 PM
9

Her willingness to take her husband's name indicates her commitment to the man who's marrying her. So you'd take her name to show your commitment to her? Of course you wouldn't, so why expect her to do that? Also I love fucking my boyfriend. Still not taking his name if we marry.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/21 08:41 PM
10

Otherwise you will spend the rest of your married life being the woman who refused to change her name I'd gladly be that woman. I like my name, I've had it my entire life and I'm not changing it just because society tells me so.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/21 08:37 PM
3

Not all men can control themselves. Billions of men perfectly manage to control themselves every day. Why try to make excuses for the few who can't? It would be so much easier for those few men to learn how to control themselves than for all women to adjust to those few idiots.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/21 09:03 AM
5

Yeah same for me. I'm in a LTR with someone I want kids with, but that's just not working out yet. He recently graduated uni, I'm about to. We'll have to work hard for a few years and if we're lucky, we can buy a house and have some of our studentloans paid off. I want to give my future kids a nice life, ideally better than the quite modest upbringing I got. We can't do that if we were to start having kids now.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/21 07:37 PM
1

Like wearing a tank top, chains, tatoos ext) and acts like he is desirable (asshole, treats woman like objects, acts like he has lots of options ext) Not even the most handsome guy in the world would get attention from me if he looked and acted like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/21 09:03 AM
3

Thanks for the reply. I get what you mean and I am cautious. But I am cautious for myself, not because a strange man on the internet tells me so.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/21 07:35 PM
3

I think this article gives a good perspective on these types of discussions. Context: in March, Sarah Everard went missing in London. As a response, police told all women to just stay inside at night. Since advice that like is so normalized, women ridiculed it by suggesting a curfew for men instead (like: why should the potential victims stay inside instead of the potential attacker). Sarah was found dead a week later, the main suspect is actually a policeman.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/21 07:31 PM
4

what i expect from women is that they are cautious The word 'expect' actually angers me. You don't get to expect things of me. I don't know you and I make my own decisions.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/21 07:10 PM
1

So, there's supposed to be 8 major dealbreakers, but he only mentions 4 (of which I already disagree with at least 2). What are the others? You can't make a point of how so few women don't have dealbreakers and therefore dating sucks, if you don't tell us what kind of dealbreakers these are. Is it: 'she's not a supermodel' or 'she can think for herself'? We don't know.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/21 12:11 PM
8

women's "sex skills" don't matter because her role is almost entirely passive This is so far from the truth, it honestly makes me feel a bit sorry for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/21 06:15 PM
2

Legality is not the same as morality, which is what we were talking about. I also don't understand why you keep directing your speech to me. I never said I wanted cops to protect me at all times, neither that I feel unsafe.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/21 12:56 PM
4

If someone's life is in danger I think it's pretty safe to say laws are being broken --> therefore it would be a cops job.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/21 12:23 PM
3

No duty to protect an individual is not the same as there being absolutely no legal requirements with regards to how policement have to do their job. Maybe not under criminal law, but perhaps under their employment contract. Either way, as I have said this also depends on where you live. I live in a country where police have to do at least 4 years of training, for example.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/21 09:35 AM
2

He's not legally obligated to though that's my point Obviously there is a large gray zone where action/inaction would depend on the individual cop, but I'm guessing/hoping there must be some sort of negligence provision if cops consistently don't do their job? Next to that, it would be a huge improvement if cops get proper training in (amongst other things) de-escalating situations, rather than just shooting their gun the second they feel threathened.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/21 08:50 AM
1

If they do is a different question to if they should (and the answer to the first question also depends on where you live).
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/21 08:24 AM
20

If I'm a cop, I'm not going to risk my life and career to save someone. Well if we're talking about cops specifically, I actually would argue that if that's your job and what you are being paid for, you do have a moral obligation to help people. Obviously within reason, but if you're going to 'show up after' because it might be dangerous for you, you just shouldn't be a cop.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/21 06:44 AM
1

Well, we had previously met through a common friend, so I guess it goes as follows: step 1: make friends. step 2: make use of said friends to meet more people (at parties or so) step 3 luck out
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/21 11:31 AM
6

We had met once before and I liked him. I saw him at a party and went to talk to him. I suggested we go back to his place. (My goal at the time was a ONS, clearly that got slightly out of hand 😅)
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/21 09:27 PM
-2

The post title literally says 'in dating and romance'. But I'll humor you: do you think not listening to the women you want to date will help in getting to date them? Really?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/21 07:22 PM
-6

you changed it to 'specifically a particular woman you are dating'. that was the question OP asked. I didn't change anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/21 06:30 PM
5

You think you'll have more success in dating if you don't listen to the woman you want to date? Really?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/21 06:21 PM
29

Thinking the first move / expression of interest needs to come from men. (Fueled by fear of rejection) I only once had the courage to make the first move with a guy I liked; we've been together for almost 5 years now.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/21 05:50 PM
3

Luckily, not all men harrass women (and/or girls)
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/21 04:55 PM
3

1: I wish it was just one individual. I have met my fair share of creeps by now. 2: I never said I conclude that all men are creeps. Most aren't. But I have nothing to gain from chit chatting with a man. Why take the risk?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/21 04:50 PM
9

Victim blaming. Plenty women here have explained already that there is not much we can wear that wouldn't be considered sexy or provocing by some men. Clearly, it's men who are the problem here. I know that my sheer EXISTENCE provokes some men. Should I just stay at home for the rest of my life, so you can't accuse me of provoking men anymore?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/21 04:44 PM
11

I can back up her story. For me not at 10, but just a bit older at 12-15. I was catcalled sooo often at that age, by men 3-4 times my age. Much more often than now I'm a grown woman. My parents had no idea of any of this, btw. I'm hoping your daughter doesn't experience it, but just because you're not aware, doesn't mean it isn't happening. I honestly think you are living a blissfully unaware male life. Seriously, ask your closest female friends. Every woman I know has stories like this.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/21 04:39 PM
6

Honestly I find some women disgusting who think a basic hello or chit chat is a sexual motive or advance. Unfortunately, the last time I though "oh this guy just wants to chit chat a bit, no problem", he ended up being a major creep that followed me home for the next 20min, even though I told him several times to stay away from me (first nicely, but progressively less so, even threathenend to call the police). I really REALLY want to assume that everybody is nice until they've proven otherwise, …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/21 04:32 PM
5

Fidelity shouldn't be conditional. That is contradicting the definition of the word: "fidelity: faithfulness to a person, cause or belief, demonstrated by continuing loyalty and support". and again: cheating is a severe breach of trust and confidence. If there are underlying issues in the relationship which causes them to not have sex, cheating is just not going to help that.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/21 04:12 PM
10

Answer: If a man's wants are not being met, then he has no obligation to meet his partner's wqnts. A man should put the fidelity on pause until steps are taken to address the problem and sex resumes. "Yes, let's cheat because I want more sex. That will fix my relationship." EDIT: On a more serious note: sexual frustrations in a relationship are very annoying (and something both men and women can deal with, btw). But cheating is just not going to make that better, only worse. Either there are und…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/21 09:08 AM
5

Women have killed more people since Roe v Wade than Hitler killed Yeah, cause an abortion is the same as genocide and a world war /s. WTF.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/21 02:43 PM
4

at 'normal size' 15% for men and 25% for women, is what my quick google search tells me. Healthy range for men is 10-15%, for women 20-25%.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/21 09:51 AM
19

Average body fat is 10% higher for women than for men, so I guess the answer to the question is yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/21 08:50 AM
16

I don't think a number alone would be a dealbreaker. But high numbers (20+) could be indicative of things that would be a dealbreaker for me. Not respecting women, never commiting to a relationship, etc. I would never even ask for someones n count (who does that?!), but I would look out for signs.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/21 07:02 PM
7

As a woman you should care because a guy will certainly care if told him about your body count. Great logic. Someone judges you unfairly so let's do that to them too. /s
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/21 06:55 PM
2

Exactly! It doesn't even specify if they were going for young people or the general population either
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/21 10:18 AM
1

Louisiana was just an example, but this applies to any other statistic. Like how Austrians find 7 sexual partners too conservative (when their average sexual partners is below that), or how the Netherlands has the lowest number for what they think is promiscuous, but also the second highest average sexual partners. I realize that you did not present this study as 'the abolute truth', but I think everybody should be very careful in broadcasting things like this. While you might be aware of its fl…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/21 06:52 AM
2

Countries represented by fewer than 10 respondents and states represented by fewer than five respondents were omitted from results. For all we know, Louisiana's 'average n-count' is based on 5 respondents (quite plausibe actually, since 9 states failed to reach that ridiculously low bar) The methodology sucks. 2000 sounds like a lot of people, but if isn't a representative sample even that doesn't mean much. The results being quite surprising only shows that we shouldn't be trusting them at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/21 11:12 PM
3

Well, if you don't talk ever to girls, it makes sense you're not having sex with them. And if you don't talk to girls, how would you know if they're having sex and who they're having sex with? This is just your sad incel-ish view of the world from your very narrow perspective.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/21 09:38 AM
-2

How are there far more promiscuous women But far more virgins/sexless men than ever? There's just as many men as women having sex, you're just living in a bubble.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/21 09:10 AM
3

men want women who want a family but can't find any because women nowadays are independent and have careers. It seems like you're making this line between on the one side women who want kids and want to be homemakers, and women who do not want kids and what a career and be independent instead. I would personally say that the largest group of women wants both kids and (a degree of) a career and financial independence. Whether they want to work full-time or part-time, I don't think the line is qui…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/20 11:18 PM
-1

Height also very much depends on which country we're talking about. I'm assuming you're talking from an American perspective (?). I'm from the Netherlands, where the average woman is 1.69m (5ft 6.5 inches) and the average man 1.82m (about 6ft). I am about average for Dutch women, but my bf is 1.93m (6ft4), which is tall, but not extremely tall for Dutch principles. He has several friends that are much taller than him. One friend in particular has to duck to fit through literally every door, can'…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/20 11:05 PM
1

If you had flaired the post as 'debate', sure. However, you've flaired it as science. That statement in particular is not science.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/20 11:04 PM
1

You're accusing me of cherry-picking the article yet you conveniently did not even cite the full section. Oops that's my bad, didn't read it carefully enough (it's late and I've had a few drinks). I apologize. I only made a claim about selectivity. Hypergamy is a hypothesis based on the supported selectivity. Do you have another explanation for the discrepancy? I don't, I'm just saying you really don't know enough about perpertrators (as this is a study about the victims) to be making statements…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/20 10:57 PM
5

This was explained in the post as an important point. There was no cherry-picking. You did not include that in your post. I have read it. Because of that, you do not need to copy-paste things from your post. I've read that too. However, I believe your claims regarding hypergamy are completely baseless, making this about womens choices of sexual violence. The report does not mention the gender of the perpertrator for 'forced penetration'. For rape, "male victims (93,3%) reported only male perpetr…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/20 10:30 PM
3

does not classify rape of men by women as rape, you're adding the 'by women' part. This report does not specify the gender of the attacker. It can be men too. I understand it makes sense to differentiate between 'being penetrated' and 'forced to penetrate'. They are different things. Why one is classified as rape and the other is not? I honestly don't know, I'm not an expert (and I'm guessing neither are you). Though I'm guessing if you'd ask men which one would be worse, they'd pick being penet…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/20 10:12 PM
27

I absolutely do not believe that rape of men is 'not as bad' as rape of women, and it absolutely deserves more attention as it is often overshadowed and male victims face different issues. That being said, I do believe you are cherrypicking information here. From the NISVS that you've linked: • "Nearly 1 in 5 women (18.3%) and 1 in 71 men (1.4%) in the United States have been raped at some time in their lives, including completed forced penetration, attempted forced penetration, or alcohol/drug …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/20 09:06 PM
5

They don’t ask. They just do it. Even when you tell them not to, they do it. Then they guilt trip you. Then they whine. Then they do it when you’re not home. Women can’t help themselves. That's quite a bold statement to base on that one week you lived with one woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/20 12:41 PM
1

without everyone paying for the roads, road upkeep, traffic lights and the cops to keep them safe, your food and water would never make it to you and waste would pile up Not just for personal needs, but also for gaining wealth. As if Amazon could have grown to its current size without the infrastructure that taxes pay for. Yet somehow multinationals and rich people think they did it all on their own and don't owe anybody anything. Taxes made their success possible in so many different ways.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/20 05:43 AM
2

vagina's have feelings.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/20 05:33 AM
3

I don't even live in the US, so while I feel for women in places where abortions are being restricted, no sex strike of mine will change that. I am only hurting myself and my bf, who can't change anything about it either.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/20 07:59 AM
2

Besides many of the reasons already mentioned by others, where I live abortions are very accessible and not at all under threat. Why would I go on a sex strike?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/20 07:38 AM
1

Sure, but many people don't realize how much hormonal contraceptives affect sex drive. No doctor or pharmacist ever told me in 8 years time. I felt like a different person off my birth control, but had to go on them again for reasons not related to sex drive.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/20 10:52 AM
33

Its something I've heard my bf say to his friends too. It's far from the truth in my perspective. He doesn't care much about decoration, so we have the agreement that I can buy whatever I want, but I keep the receipts so if he veto's, I have to return it. I've never needed to return anything BECAUSE I keep his opinion into account for everything I buy. If it was just me living here, the place would look totally different. But he doesn't realize that, he only sees an interior that has been select…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/20 08:10 PM
2

The 'AWALT' about it just annoys me. Not just from you, but in general. There are plenty women like me. There are also plenty women who believe there is and should be a difference between men and women in terms or roles and responsibilities. And then there are the hypocrites, but they are only a minority.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/20 09:59 PM
5

Except those aren't necessarily the same women. I want rights, I want equality to men. I will also always pay my half of the date.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/20 07:37 PM
9

I would argue that it is the passion for engineering that is part of you, more than just the job itself.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/20 10:13 PM
17

Personality leads to accomplishments, jobs etc. I wouldn't love someone because of their job or something they achieved, but I could love someone for their ambition or their passion (which leads to them having a certain job for example). Difference is: if that person then loses their job, I don't love them any less because it doesn't change their personality.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/20 09:35 PM
2

If you compare monogamy and exclusivity in a relationship to slavery you clearly have no idea what slavery is.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/20 09:07 PM
2

No, the husband is a godforsaken asshole if he has a mistress without explicit approval of his wife. Being faithful is not the responsibility of the 'third person', but of the two people in the relationship. Additionally, I would personally describe being loyal as to explicity exclude having an affair. But maybe that's just me. /s
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/20 09:06 PM
3

I am in a LTR. For me, only the physical is cheating. So kissing and more. Flirting I don't mind at all. Deeper emotional connections that seem to surpass friendship or doing secretive things I would mind for sure, and they would warrant a serious conversation (at the least). But I wouldn't qualify it as cheating. These emotional things are always a bit more gray, you can't know what someone thinks or feels. That is opposed to the more black and white physical limits. You either did or you didn'…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/20 09:01 PM
2

Sleeping with a mistress is actually irrelevant if wife can be sure about her husbands loyalties. Uhm, what?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/20 08:52 PM
7

I'm done with you. I'm trying to explain my views and you don't have to agree with them, but at least take the time to explain why and how you don't agree. You are not taking the CMV to heart.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/20 07:15 AM
10

Have you read my comment at all? It's not me, it's everybody around you. Experts agree that 70 to 93% of all communication is nonverbal. Source It's not me who's immatute for doing what a majority of the world does, it's you who's immature for expecting all of the world to change for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/20 07:10 AM
10

Giving hints and using body language isn't necessarily a choice for most of us. It's automatic, it's nature. It's how the world works. Body language is a very important part of communication. If someone is constantly smiling, you don't need to ask if they are having a good time, because you can see that. Watching body language even tells us many things the other might not want to tell you, such as if they are nervous. You wanting or expecting all that to change is extremely immature. It's like i…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/20 06:57 AM
7

I wouldn't want to be a sister wife and no amount of money can change that. If it isn't yout personal conviction to live polygamy and you only do it for the money, I doubt it would last long anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/20 06:49 AM
13

Shouldn't be the case. It causes more problems than it helps. But it is. That's a fact. You're actually out here calling 80% of the world population immature because you struggle reading body language and wish EVERYBODY would change. Come on.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/20 06:42 AM
1

I've always wanted kids myself and I'm getting closer to an age where I'd like to have kids. It's not ideal, but not an immediate dealbreaker if a guy has kids. If he has full-time custody that might scare me off, same as if he hardly had any contact with his kids. If he is a good father for his kids I wouldn't mind him having kids. Also very interesting to see how he interacts with his ex, if he treats her like shit I would probably realize that that could be me and leave. I think it would also…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/20 04:09 PM
5

This has nothing to do with my previous comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/20 10:01 PM
5

Newsflash: there are other countries besides yours. Where I'm from 6ft is average. Besides that, while I don't think I would ever reject a guy just because he's short, but in the end you cannot force attraction. If a woman says she likes tall guys, why would you even care if that's unrealistic or not? What's the problem with having a type?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/20 08:12 PM
7

I wouldn't consider a man who thinks he deserves empathy and compassion for not cheating on their partner a high quality man. That's the base line of a relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/20 08:01 PM
2

Even the video title: 'Expect THIS from women' says that this video is really aimed at men.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/20 07:53 PM
3

By 'being yourself' I don't mean dress like you'd be spending the night on the couch by yourself, I mean dress like you're going out with friends. Obviously first impressions matter, but I don't think you need to act any differently from, say when you're meeting a new colleague. Don't be your 'worst' self, but definitely don't pretend you're someone you're not.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/20 04:29 PM
8

Great advice for LTR, not so great if you're looking for a hook-up.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/20 01:42 PM
2

There are about a million reasons someone wears a specific outfit. Fashion, temperature, comfort, personal style, etc. Yes, wanting to show off your body is one of them. But in my view, for many women, that is quite low on the list. That is something we clearly disagree on. Would be nice if you could simply acknowledge I'm not automatically lying because I don't agree with you. Also, things like men staring at boobs are much more related to the size of the boobs than the clothes, if you ask me.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/20 06:58 PM
2

Why is it so hard for you to believe that someone sees the world in a different way from you? That you are so convinced that your view is the only one and that because I'm disagreeing with you I must be lying?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/20 06:32 PM
2

Disagreeing with you (on a debate sub) doesn't mean I'm being difficult. It also doesn't mean I am lying or denying these 'thruths'. I simply disagree with you.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/20 06:22 PM
2

I'm just catching him in his lies. That's not harrassing. Also, I don't wear clothes like the example used. OP stated earlier he doesn't care about revealing clothes, he cares about women lying about their reasons for wearing them. Having established he can't know if they are lying (which he agreed with), turns out it is the clothes that bother him. Fine by me, but why lie about it (oh, the hypocrisy...)
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/20 05:43 PM
2

Ok, so earlier when you said you did not have a problem with revealing clothes, you were lying? You said that your problem was with the hypocrites, but now we've established there's no way of knowing if these women are hypocrites, the problem is the clothes?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/20 05:23 PM
2

Are you really not getting what I'm saying? If I would be wearing revealing clothes and I tell you I do that because I'm hot (temperature wise). How exactly are my words not matching my actions? It's hot and I'm wearing revealing clothes. That's all you know. I MIGHT be lying. True. But you say it's not your job to investigate if I'm lying. So why not just trust me? Why would you then qualify me as a hypocrite, because you think I'm lying about why I'm wearing revealing clothes, when you say you…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/20 05:10 PM
2

but if you say one thing and do another that's what I'm gonna base my opinion off You've literally just said you can't read minds so how do you know that?? You cannot know if her motives are different from what she's telling you.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/20 04:54 PM
4

I will repeat it because you did not answer me. How do you know these women are hypocritical about it? How do you know that someone is wearing revealing clothes, really because she wants to wear revealing clothes, but she says it's because of the weather? How do you know she isn't actually wearing it because of the weather? I'll answer it for you: You don't know that.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/20 04:37 PM
4

Because your gender was crystal clear. So now a serious answer. Firstly, many men go topless with hot weather. Secondly, how do you know these women specifically are hypocrites? Maybe they are completely fine with men going topless? edit: also, it was a joke, not an insult.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/20 04:25 PM
5

I'm not a woman You don't say
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/20 04:21 PM
1

That first part... What a load of jibberish. What are you trying to say? As for the second, obviously you cannot decide what career someone will have. But say, she loves her job so much that she does not want to work any less when you have kids. And she wants you to quit your job? Would you still say you don't care at all? I mean, you can be completely fine with it, but it's her career causing a big change in your life. You really wouldn't care whatsoever? There are way bigger priorities like be…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/20 08:23 PM
3

I'm ignoring your second source as it's produced by a lobby organization for families. Not at all a neutral source. Just one quick example: they equate happy marriage to a long marriage. They may be related, but they do not mean the same. Just think of abusive marriages, or very conservative circles where divorce is not an option. As for the first, well, it really only says that more sex leads to higher risk of STI's and STI-related issues. That makes sense, doesn't it? But: it's not sex itself …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/20 08:12 PM
1

You don't need to hide in reddit, I have no idea on who you are, or what you do, nor I care really, just accept who you are. Funny how you even say you don't know me, yet somehow you are convinced I don't accept myself. I can't speak for all men and all women, surprised that you think you can. But speaking om behalf of myself and my friends, I and most of my friends would prefer a man with an average N count. Not (much) higher than my own, but also not a virgin or close to. I like a bit of exper…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/20 07:54 PM
1

Please enlighten me. I am extremely curious for all these studies that link more sexual partners with cancer and whatnot.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/20 07:44 PM
1

And you are basing all of these wild claims on...?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/20 07:36 PM
1

The same way men are care very little about women's careers, women care very little about men's n count. Those are some real big generalizations you are making there. I disagree with both, second more than the first.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/20 07:36 PM
2

By taxing me for universal healthcare, you make me unable to help the people that I care for in my life instead. Further reducing my life quality and that of those around me. It's disgraceful. You pay taxes, for which you get health care in return. It will greatly increase quality of life for the poor, while maybe very slightly decreasing that of the rich. You won't have to help out family or friends with medical bills, because the government will do that. What's disgraceful is that you seem to …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/20 06:23 PM
6

Except the point of a universal health care system is that it's universal. So not just me paying for you if you blew all your money in your 40s yet live till 90, while you don't pay for me should I need it. We all help each other. You can't half ass universal healthcare.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/20 06:10 PM
4

I don't mind being denied treatment when I get severely ill at say 70yo and just dieing a natural death then. This I agree with. Calling others selfish for not making the same choice I don't agree with. But since you don't know if that will happen, for me it's hardly related to whether or not elderly care should be publically funded.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/20 06:01 PM
4

Besides, I don't mind dying at 70yo for a big discount instead of 80yo But you don't know if you will die at 70. You could also live till 90. In that case, I hope you don't spend it all in your 40s.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/20 05:52 PM
17

I don't mind paying taxes that partly go to care for the elderly. I will be old too one day.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/20 05:32 PM
6

no one.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/20 06:23 AM
9

Also I'm guessing you actually haven't been in a relationship long. Get back to me in a year or two and let me know what you think. I had a ONS about 4 years ago. I'm still with that person now.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/20 05:59 AM
8

I think what you are describing, and what I believe too, is that it's more about compatiblity. I don't think it's really the n count that matters, but what that represents. If someone remained a virgin because they think it's important to save themselves until marriage, yet the other has a relatively high n count, they probably wouldn't work out. I think that's more because of what they think is important in life and their general values being incompatible, than just the n count alone. Same with…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/20 05:22 PM
1

I did a few times. Not as much as I would have done today. This was 6-7 years ago, long before I identified as blue pill.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/20 02:45 PM
3

That trust is key. I won't date anyone anymore that is too jealous and doesn't trust me, as that is incompatible with who I am. I need someone with a strong personality. I have one too. I need someone to be able to speak up when I need to cut the crap, instead of someone who will just say 'ok' to every crazy thing I say or do. My ex was too sweet for me at times, and I could walk over him if I wanted. I sometimes did, which wasn't fair to him.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/20 02:15 PM
2

I guess I started out purple, quite like my mom, while my dad is slightly redder. I went to university, where I met more liberal people than the small-towners in my home town. Became slightly more BP, but not quite. I studied abroad in Sweden. There, I saw first hand what Sweden's quite proactive stance on gender equality did for my life, even in comparison to my already quite progressive home country. I get catcalled quite often at home, but in Sweden it literally never happened, for example. S…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/20 07:22 PM
29

Not all women think the same, we are individuals. Please realize that any generalizing statement on this will be wrong. My two cents: dressing up and looking nice, even if not purely for herself, does not mean a woman wants to be objectified. There is a difference in thinking a woman is beautiful or sexy and sexually objectifying her to just her body. I think few women want to be reduced to walking boobs with a vagina.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/20 02:11 PM
6

Someone I'm comfortable with (hard to define, but no creep and humor helps) That's the bare minimim. All other things, like having the same goals in life or being compatible in the long run, take time to figure out. I'll figure that out while we're dating.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/20 10:26 PM
0

I agree. It may not be the option for you, but to disqualify it as an option altogether is weird. It's also not illegal everywhere. See map
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/20 02:19 PM
2

Wrong. And even if true, why would you care?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/20 08:44 PM
0

I think the type of porn you are describing is much more utopian than my relationship. Porn is acted, nothing about it is real. The moans are probably not even from actual enjoyment. I have a great sex life, but it's nothing like porn. If porn is such an example for sex for you, why are movies not the same for love? So many movies with a great depiction of love, imo way more realistic than porn. and are very invested in not being emotionally dependent this might be why you struggle to find fulfi…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/20 05:25 PM
2

FWB is two people who are probably friends, but probably not best friends, who have sex. That's it. In my experience and from what I"ve heard from friends, it is mostly just the sex and a bit of hanging before the sex. Hardly ever hanging out together without sex. A relationship (and specifically a LTR) is love. No one knows me as well as my partner does, even though I have close relationships with friends as well. There is no shame, no secrets, no judgment. A lot of trust. As close to unconditi…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/20 04:29 PM
8

FWB is extremely different from an actual relationship. If you would understand that, you might actually see the added value of a relationship as opposed to just sex with someone.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/20 04:07 PM
11

I get all of your points, but then my question remains: why look for a relationship?? If sex is the only benefit you see to a relationship and all other parts of a relationship you can get elsewhere, look for a FWB, or an escort or prostitute for all I care. But if you are in a relationship purely for the sex, that's something I really really don't understand.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/20 03:51 PM
8

Could you sound more shallow?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/20 03:44 PM
10

I agree with all you've said. Just wanted to add that I think it's sad that OP is claiming violence against women by partners is going down based on just an example. There are also plenty examples of countries where this is actually going up. Example: US
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/20 01:02 PM
5

I honestly don't really get what you are trying to say in both this and your last comment...
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/20 07:19 AM
10

So if he gets the best of both worlds, why should he settle So why would that not apply to women? Are you actually saying you want to sleep around but then end up with a virgin?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/20 07:12 AM
15

If you have decided to remain a virgin until marriage because you want to have all your firsts with the partner you're gonna end up with, then I get it. (But you don't HAVE to be with a women that has a sexual past, that's up to you). But if you are also having sex with others before settling down, you are a hypocrit from expecting different/higher standards from women.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/20 07:06 AM
4

I was assaulted in a supermarket, during the day, with lot's of people close by. Dressed very modestly. And yet this persons mind when he hears sexual assault goes straight to 'slutty' girls out partying, drinking and doing drugs...
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/20 06:18 AM
4

Why do some people people commit murders? Why do some people rape? Why do some people falsely accuse people of rape? Because some people suck. I really don't have a better explanation for it. Falsely accusing someone of rape is horrible and I really don't know why someone would do that.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/20 08:18 AM
2

I can honestly say the same for the men here. But since the main difference between you and me is that I can admit that women sometimes are those things, you seem to think it's women only and (almost) never men. So who exactly lacks introspection of the two of us?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/20 12:17 PM
2

If you say so. I don't think those attributes are more prevalent in one gender over another.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/20 12:09 PM
2

As opposed to men who excell in those things?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/20 11:39 AM
1

Interesting how a question about female hypergamy is directed to men.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/20 08:26 AM
4

That would be ridiculous. I would say in maybe 97% of breakups both are to blame. Maybe one a bit more than the other, but one being completely blamefree is almost non-existent.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/20 11:00 PM
15

I think you are forgetting about a large proportion of single moms Woman F: got married, had a kid. Got divorced because the marriage simply did not work out anymore, both parties are to blame.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/20 10:13 PM
3

It's just such a weird question to me, almost like asking what the difference is between a ONS and LTR. The answer is obviously almost everything. I have really had it with the AWALT thing in general. Some women do mean shit, sure. But if someone is so convinced of AWALT, why are they even trying to get with women? They must really strongly dislike women. And then they are almost surprised that their AWALT-narrative does not get them laid. Like, wtf. Anyone, please explain because I just don't u…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/20 12:22 PM
2

What is the motivation for men to wait for sex for like a few months or something over having a 1 night stand That question kind of implies that all men are after is sex. If men really were only after sex, the ONS seems to be the way to go. A relationship, or trying to build a relationship is just completely different in every way. It's getting to know someone on a deep level, becoming ones support system, doing all kinds of fun things together. It includes sex, but it is far far more than that.…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/20 12:03 PM
6

If she doesn't want sex with you and you do want sex, just break it off. Don't pressure her. Why is that so hard? I'm not saying you should be miserable or put her happiness above yours.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/20 09:31 PM
9

I’ve noticed that some women (not all) who say they won’t hook up tend to be willing to once they realize your willing to drop them Soooo, your pro tip is to pressure women into having sex? Great advice. /s
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/20 09:18 PM
-1

So, you are so deperate for sex that if you like a girl, and she seems to really like you too, but you don't have sex on the third date (when for all you know she wanted to, but was on her period), you break it off? Really?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/20 09:08 PM
2

Would that not depend on how long you've known him? If I just started seeing somebody it can just be too soon to meet friends.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/20 08:58 PM
1

I hate the term 'relationship material', it's not a thing for me. If a guy can make me happy, he is relationship material. He might not be for someone else. I agree with u/ItIsnt0verYet. I have had casual sex with some guys as a one night stand, but when I was dating someone I actually liked, I didn't have sex with them immediately most of the time. I did not necessarily have a rule on this, sometimes you don't feel like sex, are on your period, have an early morning the next day or whatever rea…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/20 08:57 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter