TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Wraith8888 Archive

View 0 posts and 32 comments by Wraith8888 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

Well it hasn't elicited sympathy in me, and I'm a big softy. And it has elicited the opposite of sympathy from you. I also have not heard or read a single person supporting her. So either they are really, really bad at it or you may be approaching this with a preconceived idea that the media is trying to elicit sympathy.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/02/19 06:43 PM
1

I read the article. I still don't see any sympathy. It gives details of her experience, uses quotes from her but I don't see the article in any way excusing anything or suggesting she be allowed back. The only thing it points out is that the Trump administration has not addressed the issue of ex nationals who wish to return while Trump has criticized other nations for not accepting the return of their ex citizens who've done similar.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/02/19 04:54 PM
-2

From just this title I'm not seeing anything that says they're sympathetic
/r/PussyPassDenied24/02/19 03:17 PM
1

What's embarrassing is the fact that you still want to carry on this stupid ass argument for days. Please just go away.
/r/MensRights07/07/18 01:17 PM
1

Use the actual word when defining it instead of the term it derives from rhe·tor·i·cal adjective relating to or concerned with the art of rhetoric. "repetition is a common rhetorical device" synonyms: stylistic, oratorical, linguistic, verbal "rhetorical devices" expressed in terms intended to persuade or impress. "the rhetorical commitment of the government to give priority to primary education" synonyms: extravagant, grandiloquent, magniloquent, high-flown, orotund, bombastic, grandiose, pompo…
/r/MensRights05/07/18 05:28 PM
1

Rhetorical simply means a means you do not expect a response not that you aren't stating something as fact. I think you meant he wasn't stating it as fact but as hyperbole. You can't try to shut everyone down who disagrees with you by saying it was rhetorical. And rhetorical refers to questions not statements
/r/MensRights05/07/18 03:56 PM
1

I see. Not all, just all those currently alive.
/r/MensRights05/07/18 02:51 PM
1

You are not getting the point. We aren't arguing about whether it occurs or not or whether it is prevalent. We are discussing the "Every woman" which implicitly means 100%. So if there are examples of women not doing it then it is not 100% and the statement that it is is patently false.
/r/MensRights05/07/18 06:37 AM
2

I don't know why you are telling me this. I never implied I didn't think rape was a common occurrence.
/r/MensRights05/07/18 06:04 AM
2

What?
/r/MensRights05/07/18 05:54 AM
3

So, you are saying he didn't mean it. He was just being hyperbolic. See, he could have just said that. If a person says what they mean then that is proper use of language in order to properly communicate an idea. But that use of language must be difficult to grasp because you'd much rather dismiss anyone with dissenting opinion with name calling and insults. This, as everyone knows, is the best way to make your side of the issue heard.
/r/MensRights05/07/18 04:45 AM
2

Can't argue with reasoning like that.
/r/MensRights05/07/18 03:28 AM
2

He is generalizing. And exaggeration is exactly the thing he is arguing against. Women who take disagreements in a relationship and call it abuse. Yet here he is using the exact same tactic. Its lazy and counterproductive.
/r/MensRights05/07/18 03:23 AM
3

Yes, failed. And yet not one of those women who no longer wanted to be with me or were upset that I no longer wanted to be with them, ever said abuse happened in any way. So, your accusation of abusive behavior is that everyone I know with motive to accuse me of abuse hasn't? I hope your job doesn't involve logical thinking.
/r/MensRights05/07/18 03:12 AM
2

Please explain how my statement is ironic.
/r/MensRights05/07/18 03:08 AM
4

I, in no way, am saying that there aren't false accusers. My original comment was to the fact that /u/Nary believes every woman does it, which is absurd and obviously just hate rhetoric, which will never lead to meaningful change.
/r/MensRights05/07/18 03:07 AM
2

I don't think you know how irony works.
/r/MensRights05/07/18 03:01 AM
9

I've had numerous relationship that have been over for far longer than that. You need to take a look at yourself if all women in your life feel abused. "Its not me. Its everyone else." - Every self deluded person ever
/r/MensRights04/07/18 11:25 PM
13

Stop being so overly dramatic. Not a single woman I've ever been involved with has claimed abuse ever. You're just as bad as someone claiming all men are rapists.
/r/MensRights04/07/18 09:55 PM
1

And this kind of thinking right here is why people feel that some people are trying to pigeonhole other people. Are there differences between the sexes? Sure. Does this mean that everybody of particular sex is not qualified for certain positions? No
/r/MensRights23/01/18 11:39 PM
4

I am not arguing whether there is or is not a glass ceiling. I am pointing out that the ideas of those who would be participating in such would not see it as choosing oppression over profit, but would see the oppression as preserving profit. Now, again not arguing if it exists or not, the very fact that you have labeled some careers as feminine indicates a systemic defining of femininity as not those other "masculine" jobs. Labeling some jobs as "feminine" and others "masculine" could be shaping…
/r/MensRights23/01/18 06:37 PM
11

I think we also need context. What kind of class is it? I get the feeling it is a class on feminism, and if so, then of course you use feminist literature. That is the whole point of the class. If it is a general finance or sociology course then the instructor is pushing a particular point of view and needs to stop.
/r/MensRights23/01/18 04:34 PM
-3

It isn't that there is more interest in keeping women down than in making money, but that the thinking is one and the same. Keeping women out of important positions because they are incapable of handling them. If you are sexist and believe women are mentally inferior or emotionally incapable of managing then you believe that keeping them out of higher positions is what is best for making money.
/r/MensRights23/01/18 04:29 PM
1

I'll clarify: 13 year olds don't have free choice because as a society we've realized they suck at making good decisions. It's why they can't drive a car, drink alcohol, own a gun, vote, live on their own, or have sex. And as an adult you and she should know this and not participate in them doing any of these activities because it's bad for them. So, you can't use free choice when justifying this, because legally and morally that kid did not have the capacity to make the choice. She as an adult …
/r/MensRights18/01/17 08:32 PM
1

Even if he did....
/r/MensRights18/01/17 08:21 PM
1

Never? 23 year old has sex with 13 year old (that she absolutely knew was 13, as she was his teacher) is a grey area for you eh? I suppose you'd have to know each person to have an opinion about something like "Man dismembers and eats infant" where you would have to examine to make sure it wasn't self defense.
/r/MensRights18/01/17 08:03 PM
2

Am I the only one that after reading the article sees that the title was sarcasm? He concludes that she got what she deserved. http://thoughtcatalog.com/gray-collins/2017/01/13-year-old-student-seduces-his-female-teacher-on-instagram-but-now-shes-in-jail/
/r/MensRights18/01/17 07:53 PM
2

There is a power dynamic that exists. Anytime someone with power has a sexual relationship with someone over whom they wield that power the use of that power is a factor in having sex. In this case she was not only an adult, but also his teacher. Both authority figures and both entail that she protect this kid. 13 year olds do not have the emotional maturity to cope with a sexual relationship with an adult. Each has very different views and experience. You can argue that 13 year olds have sex wi…
/r/MensRights18/01/17 07:47 PM
2

In that extreme example maybe not, but date rapist will brag to his bros about "how drunk that chick is and she says she doesn't want it, but she'll love it. She just needs a real man to show her."
/r/MensRights04/10/14 01:33 PM
1

Well that is different issues than racism or sexism. And way to much to even skim over withput a dissertation on socioeconomic effects and urban behavioral trends.
/r/MensRights04/10/14 04:37 AM
1

I think the point was that men need to set an example to other men. Speak out and let them know that, no, it's not normal. We are not secretly thinking the same stuff. Much in the same way we could say that white people can make a difference with other white people hating black people. Or that black people can help stop other black people from hating on white people. People take their cues from what they perceive as their peer group.
/r/MensRights04/10/14 03:14 AM
0

But I think we don't hear it often because they know they can't say it out loud to just anyone. I have heard shit like this, but disguised as humor. But I can spot the sinister undertones vs humor. Locker rooms, biker bars, frat parties, bachelor parties. I make sure to crush that shit. We do need to make sure we set examples for others. I've had to do the same with racist crap as well. I make sure they know that just because I'm white that doesn't mean I agree with their bullshit. When we say n…
/r/MensRights04/10/14 03:10 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter