TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

WrapStrong1416 Archive

View 0 posts and 5 comments by WrapStrong1416 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Why are we attempting to compare which has more function, and thus which would be "worse" to be rid of, in the first place? It seems entirely reasonable to agree that those parts have similar purposes (mostly protection, from injury and from stimulation) and as such should be treated with similar approaches. That's not even mentioning how all forms of mutilation without enough medical cause, without the explicit consent of the individual (especially when it comes to infants) are entirely unethic…
/r/MensRights20/11/25 05:57 PM
1

Why are we attempting to compare which has more function, and thus which would be "worse" to be rid of, in the first place? It seems entirely reasonable to agree that those parts have similar purposes (mostly protection, from injury and from stimulation) and as such should be treated with similar approaches. That's not even mentioning how all forms of mutilation without enough medical cause, without the explicit consent of the individual (especially when it comes to infants) are entirely unethic…
/r/MensRights20/11/25 05:57 PM
1

Can't it be both? I'd argue sexual pleasure is entirely necessary for the development of an infant who will one day become an adult with sexual needs.
/r/MensRights20/11/25 05:50 PM
1

Removal of the clitoris would not impair a woman's ability to have sex, children or achieve orgasm (during sex, masturbating is a different story, and even then, it only removes one option). Yes it would, to all of these. Many cannot enjoy sex at all without clitoral stimulation, as a matter of fact even the production of lubrication often correlates with the arousal related to clitoral stimulation. So unless you believe that reproduction can or should occur without pleasure to the female, then …
/r/MensRights20/11/25 05:39 PM
1

"I can't help but think this is a concession made for fear of outraging the female." There are far more scientific concessions made out of avoiding outraging the male rather than outraging the female, especially if you consider historically, since men would ignore the discussion of female sexual anatomy (at least regarding the pleasure aspect) almost entirely for decades, since it was not considered priority (it still is fairly understudied and ignored as well, despite rise in the discussion, if…
/r/MensRights20/11/25 05:30 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter