XCZeb98 Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
1	Does anyone actually think women would become much more aggressive and pursuing if men became less plentiful? Unless, in addition to becoming more rare, the average male becomes more attractive, then no. The whole "dick is abundant and has no value" holds truth. Yep, spot on. As to what F/M ratio would be required for average males to become more attractive, hm.. that's a tough one, maybe 80/20 or 90/10?	/r/PurplePillDebate	18/05/17 06:22 AM
1	What people miss about the fact that " back in the day 17 women reproduced for every man" Preventing their low quality of life by preventing them from being conceived in the first place is even more humane :P	/r/PurplePillDebate	17/05/17 06:35 AM
1	low SMV people throwing themselves at high SMV people is off-putting regardless of gender. You didn't respond to anything I've wrote. Stop blaming women and take some responsibility. It's not women's responsibility to teach unattractive men where they stand in the SMP.	/r/PurplePillDebate	17/05/17 05:52 AM
1	low SMV people throwing themselves at high SMV people is off-putting regardless of gender. Part of being properly socialized is knowing where you stand in terms of attractiveness. If a dude by the times he's ~20 really has no clue as to where he stand with regards to this or if he hasn't learned that he is undesirable/unattractive, then he has some major issues going on (and him not knowing his own sexual demographic is a big reason why he is a creep). So first he should work on that.	/r/PurplePillDebate	17/05/17 05:43 AM
1	low SMV people throwing themselves at high SMV people is off-putting regardless of gender. A lot do, a few would rather approach them. But pretty much all women don't want to be approached by creepy unattractive men.	/r/PurplePillDebate	16/05/17 09:25 PM
1	What people miss about the fact that " back in the day 17 women reproduced for every man" You know, it's something that a lot of people on TRP says, that it would just shift but I don't believe -for the most part, it's true. Attractive is attractive, healthy is healthy, free from debilitating illnesses is free from illnesses etc. You don't suddenly become less healthy/attractive because near-everyone is healthier or better looking or taller etc. People would simply be healthier/better looking/taller as a population nor would the benefits of having a globally healthier population beco…	/r/PurplePillDebate	16/05/17 09:21 PM
0	What people miss about the fact that " back in the day 17 women reproduced for every man" Or, instead of going full Nazi and killing millions of people (which would be mostly men btw) you could just give women the ability and freedom to choose genetically superior males and get rid of the traditional institutions that have historically sought to restrict women's agency and freedom to choose the best, most attractive mating partners. You'll see that with low reproductive worth men out of the picture, there's going to be a significant decrease of undesirable people quickly enough. Free…	/r/PurplePillDebate	16/05/17 06:15 PM
0	What people miss about the fact that " back in the day 17 women reproduced for every man" In theory a perfectly socialist country should also equalize the sexual marketplace. In theory, a country should respect people (men and women)'s right to select whomever agrees and consent to be with them in return. It's not the job of the government to make sure undesirable people are matched (and it so happens that there are a lot more undesirable males around).	/r/PurplePillDebate	16/05/17 06:02 PM
1	low SMV people throwing themselves at high SMV people is off-putting regardless of gender. Men feel they should approach. Women certainly don't expect/hope/desire to be approached by creepy men. Believe me, it's one thing (stemming from gender expectations) that most women would have no issues if we did away with.	/r/PurplePillDebate	16/05/17 04:46 PM
1	low SMV people throwing themselves at high SMV people is off-putting regardless of gender. The amount of women men find sexually repulsive (and thus find creepy or off-putting) is an order of magnitude less than the amount or percentage of men we find viscerally sexually repulsive so I would say: save for some extreme cases, not really	/r/PurplePillDebate	15/05/17 06:28 PM
4	Don't like the SMP today? You wouldn't have liked it in the past... SMP was better in the past for low SMV males no doubts, when women were all but forced to take husband (and in all likelihood: sexually repulsive ones). Now that women are free(r), SMP is much better for women as they are free to choose whomever they desire to fuck. "So overall, SMP is not better then, it just benefits different groups." I can see some will argue...well, no actually. It IS objectively morally better because the freedom of women to choose always takes precedence over males being …	/r/PurplePillDebate	15/05/17 06:06 PM
2	low SMV people throwing themselves at high SMV people is off-putting regardless of gender. Definitely creepy as shit. Though I would say it's something creepy or unattractive men do at a much, much greater rate than homely women, hence why it's mostly men who get a bad rep from doing it.	/r/PurplePillDebate	15/05/17 04:47 PM
1	Options are not the same as realistic potential decisions to be made That's the point. A woman who can get a superior or better mate will not want to fuck an unattractive man. A woman who can't (and I'd say there's not a whole lot because of hypergamy) get something other than an unattractive man will often times prefer not to screw said unattractive man and rather remain without altogether.	/r/PurplePillDebate	15/05/17 04:44 PM
2	Options are not the same as realistic potential decisions to be made Well, it is an analogy :P The point is we'd rather not fuck anyone than to fuck an unattractive man.	/r/PurplePillDebate	15/05/17 12:48 AM
1	Options are not the same as realistic potential decisions to be made A more apt analogy would be starving versus having only rat poison to eat.	/r/PurplePillDebate	15/05/17 12:04 AM
5	Q4ALL: How will reproductive technologies shape the SMP and gender dynamics in the decades ahead? Yep. TRPers shouldn't have any issues with this. Women are already electing to have their babies conceived by donors that have been selected with highly specific criteria (as desired and chosen by women) and it's only get more common and more reproductive technologies will be added on top of that. Healthier, better looking people with less and less crippling illnesses or unfortunate individuals. Unless one is deeply insecure, this is something most should support.	/r/PurplePillDebate	14/05/17 10:15 PM
1	Options are not the same as realistic potential decisions to be made Even if you aren't attracted to someone, it still is a nice self-esteem boost to know they view you as attractive. No, actually. More of what repulses you = net negative. It's pretty simple. In our past it meant she was that more likely to be pursued by an unsuitable or unfit male.	/r/PurplePillDebate	14/05/17 09:33 PM
1	Options are not the same as realistic potential decisions to be made Ever visit a college campus, city, or country with highly skewed gender populations? Things get a little screwy. The men have that much more options and are thus that much less likely to commit. It raises the bar for how attractive a girl has to be for him to offer commitment. I've also noticed in places like this a LOT more fierce competition amongst the women. They're more aggressive going after men and have sex earlier to keep his attention. All of a sudden those ugly betas start to look like…	/r/PurplePillDebate	14/05/17 09:17 PM
1	Options are not the same as realistic potential decisions to be made Most "random dudes" understand they don't mean anything to an attractive female. But they still have to play the game. ...why? Like, they literally can't help themselves? If you already know the girl won't be interested why even bother her? Why not focus on someone you have a chance or is compatible with? It seems as though men could benefit from having an abundance mentality themselves.	/r/PurplePillDebate	14/05/17 09:07 PM
1	Do Women Hate Weak/Unattractive Men? No (what the hell) Hatred is reserved for stuff like racism, misogyny, antisemitism, things of that nature. Indifference (or -at worse, sexual revulsion) is not the same thing like at all. Not even in the same category. Though if it's something that preoccupies you, I'd say just don't bother/harass women and no one is going to "hate" on you.	/r/PurplePillDebate	14/05/17 07:57 PM
1	Discussion: Would you have a child (or children) through the eugenics method described in the film Gattaca? Almost everyone can be above average That makes little sense. By definition, only a minority of ...well, anything, really, will or can be above average (otherwise, it's known simply as "being average")	/r/PurplePillDebate	14/05/17 07:16 PM
1	Discussion: Would you have a child (or children) through the eugenics method described in the film Gattaca? In some ways we're already doing that when we choose our mating partner. Usually, the good lookings will pair off, leaving homely individuals to pair off themselves. This would at least give the less genetically attractive or intelligent couples a chance to have children that are more socially desirable than they could naturally. But then if everyone does it... then it becomes the norm so any advantages would be mitigated by that.	/r/PurplePillDebate	14/05/17 06:35 PM
1	What do you think of this article? Is it really this bad to simply walk up to a strange woman and talk to her? No one serious argued that it is rape to go talk to a stranger woman. You're free to talk to her and she's free to feel it's making her uncomfortable or take another route next time or whatever.	/r/PurplePillDebate	14/05/17 06:14 PM