TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

XJKZen Archive

View 0 posts and 9 comments by XJKZen on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Oh, this is why a different post about her in this subreddit was taken down. She really is just another dumb one (moderators, I'm going to back the claim). I've seen feminists articulate "their points" and handle an adversarial argument, but she's not one of them. Crash-Out Kylie ragequit her debate with Andrew Wilson 5 weeks ago on the Whatever Podcast, a debate during which she said things such as, "I did not go to an Ivy League university for 4 years to be talked to like this", "I'm pretty sm…
/r/EverydayMisandry16/06/25 08:46 AM
2

You meant "unironically"
/r/EverydayMisandry16/06/25 08:31 AM
1

Wilson
/r/EverydayMisandry16/06/25 08:29 AM
2

But at the same time they claim to be the more "sympathetic"/"empathetic" ones.
/r/EverydayMisandry23/05/25 01:53 AM
1

8 minutes after making the claim that she's not one of those "angry feminists", she gets so angry that she leaves the table for a few minutes. I'm sure she would have left sooner, but the reason it took 8 minutes was because she made that claim in her opening statement while introducing herself, Andrew made his opening statements, and *then* they started the back-and-forth in which she got angry.
/r/EverydayMisandry23/05/25 01:46 AM
1

At 1:40:00 or so into the debate, she ChatGPTs a rebuttal to Andrew. She reads directly from her phone, stating different worldviews which are not her own by her own previous admission. It's really hilarious because her normal way of speaking isn't structured anywhere close to how GPT formats its text. You'd think she'd at least TRY to train it to imitate her verbiage, but the thought just never occurred to her, I guess.
/r/EverydayMisandry21/05/25 07:11 AM
1

Her arguments weren't even good. That's the worst part, she called herself smart and still proceeded to parrot the same tired and easily-dismissable "studies" I've seen even the dumbest feminist debaters use. How can you be smart when you can't even acknowledge which aspects of your own ideology are incorrect? Whatever anybody's beliefs are, if they have the self-awareness to know what's actually wrong, they can avoid looking stupid by not relying on those things as their argument. It's like try…
/r/EverydayMisandry21/05/25 05:21 AM
1

Funny how at 5:25 into the debate, she literally says these words verbatim, "I know you're expecting to get very angry and I hope that won't happen", addressing the viewers in her opening statement. Less than 10 minutes later, at 13:41, she gets so triggered by Andrew, "I will not be speaking until you (Brian) have a conversation with him" and at 14:30 she leaves the room 🤣
/r/EverydayMisandry21/05/25 05:10 AM
1

I'm blocked by her. All I did was point out how it's EXTREMELY unlikely that her IQ is 150. Mine is 136, which is the 99th percentile. For her to have a 150 IQ, it means she's in the 99.96th percentile, aka the top 0.04%. The margin of error for IQ is -5/+5. A 145 IQ is top 0.13%, 155 (which overlaps with **Stephen Hawking's** lower bound of 150) is an insane top 0.004%. I hate these women who randomly pick a number as their IQ without actually realizing how rare the number is. She made this cla…
/r/EverydayMisandry21/05/25 05:02 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter