TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

XXXblackrabbit Archive

View 0 posts and 146 comments by XXXblackrabbit on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

Exactly lmao. It ain’t getting any better bruh 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 02:41 PM
1

This is the correct take, and as much as I dislike bluepillers, the redpillers need to stop coping thinking all the beautiful women in their early 20’s will swarm them just because they turned 35 and have a Net Worth of barely $1M (news flash, that’s not nearly enough to represent any attractive kind of status). The most attractive young women want to fuck the young hot guy with his whole life ahead of him, not the old looking balding dude desperately trying to make up for lost time. Yes there a…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 02:39 PM
0

It’s not corny if it works man haha. Yeah was just curious, I always had a small social circle and never was the type of guy to play into social media BS, now I’m in my mid 20’s and want to try and get better at it if it’s necessary to attract women. I think it’s all stupid as fuck, but the game is the game, we don’t make the rules. Was just curious because I feel like if a woman saw a post of mine, even if it was a quality photo, if it only had 40-50 likes it would probably give her the ick 😂. …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 09:42 PM
1

I meant on your Instagram posts not your Reddit posts lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 09:35 PM
2

Tbh it feels like rage bait lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 08:44 PM
1

Question, do you hide the likes on your posts or do you keep the number of likes up?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 08:41 PM
1

AWALT
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 08:38 PM
2

Correct lol
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 08:37 PM
1

Everything on that dumb sub is the most obvious LARP I’ve ever seen 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 08:36 PM
-3

Nice sidestep. Not looking for approval, just making an observation to rebut your obtuse take.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 08:34 PM
9

So the slang lexicon JUST SO HAPPENS to coincide with an actual common body shaming tactic used towards men? Give me a break dude
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 08:32 PM
–

7’0 guy can slay on height alone tbh. There will always be women that will fuck him for that alone.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 08:28 PM
–

Blue pillers on this sub operate in such bad faith. They have a darwinistic/free market attitude when it suits them, but then all about human ethics/social cohesion when it doesn’t.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 08:25 PM
–

This has never been a thing ever. I have literally never heard a man talk about a woman’s vagina in any detail, whether they are blue pilled, red pilled, blackpilled, douchebags, decent guys, etc. It’s just not a thing guys do
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 08:19 PM
–

I’d say it’s over, but when did it really begin?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 08:17 PM
–

Wonder where the “porn causes unrealistic standards!” people on this sub are when it comes to this 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 08:16 PM
–

This is insanely dumb. Reworking literal language to fit some kind of narrative is the reason a lot of people become blackpilled in the first place. Theres a reason the “small” is added instead of just calling someone a “dick”. You are shaming having a small dick whether you like or not. It’s like calling something stupid “gay”, like okay sure maybe you don’t have bad intent towards the LGBTQ community, but there’s a reason we stopped using that word to describe something dumb.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 08:14 PM
0

Lmfao what BS. I’ve seen the mildest of mild complaints come from men on this sub and site that are immediately met with responses including the words “entitled” and “inkwell”
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 08:08 PM
–

I’m a guy and I shave everything besides my head and eyebrows lmao. It’s a more aesthetic look in my opinion for both men and women.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/24 06:20 PM
–

It should just be logically obvious: men who get a lot of action are probably attractive and because they are attractive, they are more likely to get action from a random hypothetical woman. It takes two brain cells to figure this out, you don’t even have to be “pilled” in any way.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/24 02:40 PM
–

I can’t believe this needs to be explained to people on this sub at this point 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/24 02:32 PM
–

Or…just maybe….he’s good looking and a lot of women want to bang him.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/24 02:30 PM
–

You give the benefit of the doubt (in my opinion undeservedly, it’s pretty obvious what happened in OP’s story) regarding the house being taken by the ex, but immediately assume the worst with the prenup (imply the new wife would be screwed unfairly in the case of the divorce).
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/24 03:21 PM
11

Being invested in the lives of celebrities/athletes is cringe af and always has been.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/24 02:23 PM
–

What is degenerate is arbitrary. I could say a woman getting passed around during her college years is degenerate, while a nerdy software engineer that is a man paying someone to see what a boob feels like is him expressing his sexuality. You kind of proved OP’s point lol
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/24 10:08 PM
1

Lmao women really think men won’t bang their hot wife because she’s too “pure”. Bruh 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/24 10:01 PM
5

This is what caught your eye, but not the previous ex who essentially took his house? 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/24 09:58 PM
3

I think if you’re being robbed, it’s a question of self defense. Also for all the questions of ethics this sub likes to discuss when it comes to age gap relationships, the same people default to what is “legal” instead of unethical when it comes to alimony/property split in divorces that favor the women clearly undeservedly. Very curious.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/24 09:57 PM
–

The bar is in hell for men that women find PHYSICALLY ATTRACTIVE, which typically only consists of the top 5-10% of men. In their heads there is no conundrum here. On a side note, women are all about having the right to stick to your preferences until men start dating younger women or don’t want to date single moms. Then all of a sudden it’s important to be open minded and “it’s takes a village to raise a child” They use social pressure and feminism as a tool to keep the RMP/SMP in their favor w…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/24 06:24 PM
11

This is just “women are wonderful” effect combined with the fact men will date anyone since the RMP/SMP is insanely skewed in 2024 to be in the favor of women
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/24 06:19 PM
1

You’re arguing with someone who will rationalize women’s actions no matter what. It’s a waste of energy
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/24 06:00 PM
–

He’s “economy class” is such a BROOOTAL way of of putting it 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/24 05:56 PM
–

Chad got the best sex and bounced, the betas are bag holders that need to provide all the other crap. Many such cases!
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/24 05:53 PM
1

The child is entitled to support from the mother who CHOSE to deliver the child, not the father who did not say they wanted to be a parent (at least in my theoretical opt-in system). Idk what your contention is, women earn their own money and can take care of a kid, single moms already exist. You even say “blaming women who don’t get an abortion is valid”, so where are we disagreeing? You are saying the consequences of a world where men aren’t forced to pay might put strain on the system, I actu…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/24 02:40 PM
1

I have no idea what your take is here. Are we arguing about what is “fair” in theory or are we talking about a hypothetical policy detail? If it’s the former, sounds like you agree with me. If it’s the latter, i would say if the woman fails to inform the man in the appropriate time window, she shouldn’t be entitled to support regardless. I personally support the “opt-in” model outside of marriage, meaning it’s on the woman to get a man to officially claim the child otherwise she should be respon…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/24 04:51 PM
1

There is a choice that doesn’t infringe on women’s bodily autonomy. It’s called paper abortion lol. Forcing men to pay 18 years of child support infringes on their bodily autonomy via their labor.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/24 02:34 PM
1

Correct but we allow women to make a choice AFTER they get pregnant. Rattling off all the choices men have before pregnancy is a completely different context, male birth control isn’t analogous to abortion, it’s analogous to female birth control.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/24 01:43 PM
2

Great point on the laws protecting discrimination against pregnant women in the workforce. Completely wrecks the bad faith arguments in this thread that default to “but biology isn’t fair bro”.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/24 12:51 PM
2

This argument of “you have all the choices in the world BEFORE she gets pregnant” is so braindead
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/24 12:46 PM
0

Men that aren’t Chads that obtain some kind of sexual gratification outside the conventional drudging through multiple dates/being in a committed relationship process will be scrutinized and often blamed as exploitative by women. Goes to show how bad average male SMV is, since in the heads of women if they get laid easily with no commitment, they must have “cheated” somehow to get it.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/24 12:35 PM
1

Is casually dating 4 women at the same time “abusive” and “unfair”?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/24 09:42 PM
–

The nuance of what you support or don’t doesn’t matter because people will share whatever on these sites regardless. You’re being incredibly naive if you think people will all be mature and stoic enough to share things that only fall under the air-right indisputable definition of abuse, people WILL stray outside of that and gossip. And the sexual history I mentioned is probably relevant to men doing vetting, what men and women look for is asymmetric, doesn’t make one form of vetting more valid t…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/24 08:52 PM
–

I’m countering the silly idea of using free speech as a counter to these public forums sharing private information. Learn nuance
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/24 08:47 PM
–

Abuse these days can be spun as literally anything. Especially from a woman’s perspective. Women will call not texting back quickly enough as abusive. It’s become such a meaningless word that encompasses doing anything slightly bad in a relationship. But listen, if this is based on advocating vetting, men are interested in the things I mentioned. So if one is okay, then it’s all okay 🤷‍♂️
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/24 08:14 PM
–

Okay let’s forget about revenge porn. How about a forum that details a woman’s body count, every sexual activity she was willing to do, how many dates it took to sleep with her, etc? And of course an identifying photo to go along with that information so other men know who the woman is.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/24 07:59 PM
–

Okay fair enough then
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/24 07:56 PM
–

By your logic you shouldn’t be mad about people who share revenge porn since it’s fascistic to not be able to and is a valid exercise of freedom of speech.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/24 07:34 PM
–

Doesn’t really matter. You can make smut out of words. Images and video are covered under freedom of speech. I think if you’re allowed to bad mouth and share “private” information regarding someone you dated publicly, being mad about revenge porn is inconsistent. I could weaponize the word fascist like you’re doing for being mad about a guy not being able to share his own form of expression to other people.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/24 07:32 PM
2

Men could solve all of this by making the standard for marriage sky high while keeping the standard for dating reasonable. Currently only the “Chads” do that, but if average looking men followed this principle you’d see the RMP/SMP shift for the better.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/24 07:12 PM
–

Is revenge porn freedom of speech?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/24 07:10 PM
2

They’re basically just admitting it 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/24 02:08 AM
3

Your response is bad faith, he wasn’t claiming anyone here is advocating for 3 years old to vote. He was making a point about the inconsistency of the argument that anyone affected by government policy should be able to vote.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/24 02:07 AM
4

This is the correct take
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/24 02:03 AM
12

Cool, raise the voting age to 25 then. I don’t want people whose brain isn’t finished developing to decide the future of the country.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/24 02:02 AM
–

Agree with the premise, although I have no clue why birth control is listed as a reason. I genuinely have no sympathy for men in my generation who get married and screwed in divorces or cucked via paternity fraud. There is plenty of data to show it’s not a good idea to be bluepilled about these things, yet these men will blindly embrace these institutions without considering the modern context, while calling guys like me misogynists. I just laugh at these kinds of men nowadays.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/24 07:27 PM
3

It’s definitely true though lol. If she really likes you, she’ll leave plenty of doors open and continue to give you chances.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/24 07:22 PM
1

I trust Morgan Stanley’s analysis on women’s romantic lives the same amount I trust Morgan Stanley’s analysis of the housing market in 2008
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/24 03:15 AM
2

You’re literally describing betabuxxing 😂😂😂
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/24 09:17 PM
1

Your first two paragraphs are bang on point, the second two paragraphs are complete nonsense. Most of the male population that can’t land women no matter what will beta-buxx that post wall single mom happily and rationalize away what you said in the first two paragraphs. There is no “payback” women will experience, they just have to lower their physical standards slightly at most and will find perfectly good men. It’s time for red pillers to stop with the revenge fantasy nonsense and accept the …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/24 09:14 PM
3

95% of single men over 50 have 0 SMV. 4.9% have a decent amount of money/status so they can betabuxx a 45 year old divorced single mom if they want. The last 0.1% are the only ones that can still pull quality women because they are insanely rich and/or extremely good looking.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/24 09:10 PM
1

I tend to agree in a purely “effectiveness” sense when it comes to post college dating.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/24 11:35 PM
3

That’s 99% of men. Confident, witty, charming, you can still have those things and not generate real physical desire. Women aren’t attracted to most men, so there’s no reason for older men to throw out that betabuxx lifeline to older women if they have a shot with younger women 🤷‍♂️
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/24 01:21 PM
2

If your grandparents got married in their early 20’s, my point is that’s a completely different situation than the hypothetical, so YOU would be the one straying off topic. And actually you’re wrong, the discussion is primarily about what older men want. In the example OP presented, the age of the examples he gave are 40, not 55. So once again, you’re off topic using 55 as your benchmark age. And yes, plenty of men 40 + would like to be physically desired, if your grandpa didn’t care for that, g…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/24 02:54 AM
3

If you’re talking about guy 2, nobody is saying he is a catch. That’s the point of the post lol
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/24 02:49 AM
3

Exactly. On average, men in general aren’t attractive to women regardless of age, and 40 year old men aren’t any exception. So if his only appeal is some form of stability, may as well go for the more physically attractive option.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/24 01:55 AM
3

Nobody’s flaunting money. The 40 year old isn’t throwing bands at women like an idiot. There’s an implication that older men are more stable and have built a “foundation” that women can insert themselves into. The only relevant question here is if there’s even really a difference between the way older and younger women perceive him in terms of sexual attraction, and if there isn’t, why in the world wouldn’t he go after the younger more attractive woman in general?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/24 01:52 AM
2

Nobody said anything about rushing. Idk what that has to do with this convo
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/24 01:48 AM
3

The ultimate goal for any human being is to obtain what THEY want from relationships. So yeah if a 40 year old guy considers the sex component important, then this isn’t 10th grade locker room talk. If your grandad married your grandma at 40+ (I’m assuming they did otherwise it wouldn’t be relevant to the discussion and there’s no way you’re operating in bad faith here right? 😂) and he was totally cool with little sexual attraction from someone he wasn’t even that attracted to, then good for him…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/24 01:47 AM
4

So then what’s the point lol. If you want to find a partner as a man, sex is going to be a huge component, and if it’s going to be transactional either way, may as well go for the younger woman if you can right?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/24 01:32 AM
4

🧢🧢🧢🧢🧢🧢
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/24 01:30 AM
3

Sigh you knew what he meant by “pay” but decided to derail the convo anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/24 01:29 AM
5

Every average looking 40 year old man is leading with his wallet (maybe you call it “stability” but these are essentially synonyms)
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/24 01:28 AM
4

You’re missing the point OP is making so badly
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/24 01:27 AM
6

Oof perfectly logical post that all the PPD women are going to bend over backwards to rationalize 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/24 01:17 AM
5

You guys do understand women will bend language to avoid accountability right? This is normal behavior for them and the word “insecure” has been meaningless for a decade now, it’s better to just accept it the same way a small child might use a word incorrectly.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/24 02:45 PM
1

There is no way you thought people here would interpret what you said charitably, but I get what you’re trying to touch on. I definitely would not have compared hitmen to hookers, you’re opening yourself up to bad faith attacks. Leave it at “modern society accepts and even passively encourages women to use their advantage of sexuality over men leading to an imbalance”.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/24 05:33 PM
-1

I’m calling cap, and you’ll insist it happened. Doesn’t matter. And he’s not “contributing to the household” if he’s paying for YOUR car and you guys aren’t even married. He’s just paying for your shit and now he’s your ex so it didn’t end up counting for anything for him.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/24 08:51 PM
-1

Having social skills doesn’t mean simping for a woman and paying for her shit lmao. It’s pointless to argue about this on this forum because I’d bet the ugly dude you’re talking about probably isn’t that ugly if he was able to freeload, and the Chad you mentioned paying for your stuff probably isn’t really a Chad in terms of looks. You of course will deny it, and we’ll just never know.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/24 08:44 PM
1

It’s only the top 1% of men in terms of looks that can get away with this. Which is hilarious because it just proves the point that average looking stable men have less RMV than a homeless Chad.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/24 07:12 PM
0

“Soft” polygamy is extremely popular in NYC and LA. (Basically just open relationships). It you don’t think Chad has soft harems, you live under a rock.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/24 02:07 PM
1

Lmao “paying someone for use of their organs” is such a bizarre way of describing sex. Come on, this reeks of bad faith. There is no magic difference between casual sex and prostitution, the latter just has a monetary incentive instead of a physical incentive.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/24 05:59 PM
1

What contempt? He’s acknowledging he’d have a lower tolerance for disrespect from women if he didn’t have an issue with getting laid. It’s such a lukewarm take
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/24 05:39 PM
1

Completely irrelevant. You could say decriminalizing drugs is causing an uptick in drug mules crossing the border, that shouldn’t affect and individuals right to do whatever they want to put in their body. There are plenty of policies that have bad “side effects”, and those side effects should be addressed, but the government shouldn’t get involved in people’s bodily autonomy. So yes, it’s irrelevant.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/24 03:45 PM
1

Obviously all of these people deserve sympathy, but my point is the exclusive pearl clutching women have towards sex workers seems like concern trolling. There are an infinite number of exploitative situations in the world, yet only sex work seems to require the utmost scrutiny from PPD women. It’s obvious to me why.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/24 03:42 PM
1

Someone I was responding to said “slimeball” regarding men who pay for sex which is why I quoted it. And yeah you’re spewing more irrelevant ad hominem, yawn. For what it’s worth from a random internet stranger, I think you’d be surprised at who I am irl. But either way, sounds like you don’t have an argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/24 02:42 AM
1

She’s just making shit up, don’t bother engaging it’s all bad faith.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/24 02:39 AM
1

Oof more poisoning the well. Do you pearl clutch about whether a drug mule brought weed across the border every time you hit a joint? Grow up lady
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/24 01:16 AM
-2

None of this is relevant. What the fuck is “real” consent lmao. You’re obfuscating so hard, he paid, she agreed to fuck him, it’s consensual. You want to poison the well by implying it might not be, but that’s just stupid.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/24 12:43 AM
2

No disagreement from me on that, but i think bringing up human trafficking every time prostitution is brought up in the context of dating dynamics is as nonsensical as bringing up drug mules when talking about where to buy molly. Often irrelevant.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/24 10:46 PM
-2

For the studies that go against the point I’m making, I’m sure plenty of guys want to leave their shitty wage slave jobs, or military jobs where they might get blown up, or coal miner jobs where they’ll probably get lung cancer, but they don’t because they have to put food on the table. I don’t have any more sympathy for prostitutes than I do for these men. Either sex work is “real” work or it’s not, I personally think it is, and if it is then I don’t think of the conclusions of the first few st…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/24 10:35 PM
1

It’s actually no different from women smashing a bunch of Chads and then not settling for Billy Beta. Yet of course only one of these is a problem
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/24 10:28 PM
-6

All you did was yap. No guy is parading around the fact that he tricks for hookers, so it’s a moot point about not being taken seriously by other women, guys just wouldn’t mention it. Yes they aren’t “exclusive alternatives” since those same women are available to other John’s, but the point OP is making is that there’s a lesser likelihood a guy would tolerate disrespect from a woman knowing he can get his base needs addressed without issue. That’s where the “leverage” is.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/24 10:23 PM
1

She’s not entitled to a relationship from me. I’m open minded though, so I’d be cool with dating her casually 🤷‍♂️
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/24 10:20 PM
1

You missed the point completely about the “trafficking” portion. There is no reason to assume in America if you are visiting an independent escort that the woman is being trafficked. Literally none. There are plenty of industries that have its problems, you could argue the US getting immigrants to serve in the military for a chance at citizenship is dangerous in a similar way. Women immediately bringing up trafficking whenever there is a conversation on prostitution is a complete distraction, an…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/24 10:15 PM
1

So in your view, there is no difference between a Chad who can pull women without paying, and a John that is shameless about tricking as far as their “readiness for a relationship”? If you say there’s no difference, I respect the consistency then and can respect the take.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/24 09:03 PM
1

Eh, I’ll casually date her if she’s attractive
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/24 09:02 PM
1

Hard not to say it when you keep doing it. And judging by the way you talk, what guys?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/24 09:02 PM
2

Literally every situation in the world is exploitative, (I get a burger at McD’s where the fry cook gets paid crap, I buy weed from a guy who can’t get a regular job because he has a record, I get a cheaper rate from Mexican contractors to do my roof because they might not be documented) I think women on this sub are overly concerned with prostitution because 1) it threatens their SMV 2) they have inherent disgust for men who can’t get laid on their own (even though those men aren’t necessarily …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/24 08:56 PM
3

You’d be surprised how many guys have seen sex workers on the low and not told you 😅. Enjoy pearl clutching over hookers.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/24 08:50 PM
2

So is non-consensual sex via bar pickup. So is drug muling, if a guy told you he smokes weed, are you going to assume some drug mule hauled his product across the border? It’s a bad poisoning the well argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/24 08:49 PM
3

There’s no difference in the consensual aspect of it, I definitely believe that. And a guy being unable to get laid and deciding to see a prostitute definitley doesn’t immediately make him a “pathetic slimeball” in the same way a woman having casual sex doesn’t necessarily make her a slut.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/24 08:47 PM
1

I’m not offended, just amused at the hypocrisy of women in this sub. It’s a pretty simple concept that seems to be triggering you: if a man has access to a lot of women, they’re less likely to take disrespect from a new random woman they meet. You of course pearl clutch and make it seem like OP is trying to revoke the 19th amendment via hookers lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/24 08:45 PM
2

Lmao what? Your logic makes 0 sense. Why would you assume a guy who has gone to a prostitute had any less of a consensual experience than a guy who picked up a girl from a bar?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/24 08:41 PM
3

And that’s relevant to the discussion how?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/24 08:39 PM
-1

You pulled that stat out of your ass. In America if you see an American citizen that is an independent escort, they are doing that voluntarily. Just more poisoning the well nonsense. People that are financially desperate also do minimum wage jobs that suck, it just is what it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/24 08:39 PM
3

Poisoning the well. Not all bar hookups are completely consensual, plenty of people have had bad experiences. Also you’re just making a case on why prostitution should be legal, so if there’s foul play there isn’t any issue going to the police lmao. Just because bad things happen doesn’t mean a consensual transaction between two adults should be illegal. Enough with the pearl clutching.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/24 08:30 PM
-4

Just wondering why women here seem to moan about power dynamics when the point of this sub in a lot of ways is to discuss just that. But maybe you just don’t get it
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/24 08:26 PM
0

What looming societal consequences? Some nerdy software engineers being able to get laid that otherwise wouldn’t? Hooking up with a random at the bar is just as bad, there’s literally no difference except with prostitution some cash is involved. Both situations are consensual.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/24 08:25 PM
1

“If a woman has casual sex with a random guy at the club that they just met, they have impulse control issues, messed up risk assessment, and no self respect. Not exactly relationship material I’d say” See how dumb this is?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/24 08:19 PM
0

Lot of ad-hominem. Paying for consensual sex as a man isn’t any different than a woman having casual sex with some random guy at the club 🤷‍♂️
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/24 08:17 PM
-1

You’re refusing to acknowledge the macro power dynamics that play in the dating meta. It’s easy for women to morally grandstand when it comes to sex because it’s so accessible to them, getting laid is orders of magnitude harder for the average man. “Lack of appreciation for intimacy” is a red herring and irrelevant to the conversation, a guy that sleeps with a hooker doesn’t appreciate intimacy any less than a woman who has casual sex with some good looking dude at the club. 0 difference
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/24 08:15 PM
4

Bullshit and reductive reasoning. There is no correlation between a guy wanting to get laid and his “readiness” for a relationship lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/24 08:12 PM
-4

The pearl clutching here is insane. You’re on a sub that debates the dating meta, but morally grandstand on a macro discussion on power dynamics? Why are you even on this sub lol
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/24 08:11 PM
8

Exactly this, people are missing the general macro point being made
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/24 08:08 PM
3

Plenty of women use men for money/attention that they have no interest in. Game is game
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/24 08:07 PM
3

The amount of strawmanning PPD women do regarding prostitution is annoying as hell. They keep bringing up human trafficking in these conversations and refuse to acknowledge many women are doing this completely voluntarily.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/24 08:07 PM
5

The wall is the funniest red pill cope I’ve ever heard 😂. I know it’s brutal to know there is no fulfilling revenge fantasy for men, but there is an endless supply of betabuxxers women have access to. There are orders of magnitude more options women have proportional to how much they reduce their physical standards as they get older. But sure guys keep lifting, wage-slaving, and grinding to maybe eventually be competitive for some 40 year old mid.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/24 01:50 AM
6

Because the average guy is attracted to the average woman, but not vice versa. It’s literally that simple
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/24 07:34 PM
2

The reason the wall doesn’t exist for women is because there will always be simps/bluepillers available to betabuxx women way past their prime.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/24 02:35 PM
3

Yeah PPD women really overestimate how much men are affected by the silly psychological aspect, unless you’re annoying, a guys attraction to you isn’t going to vary much based on how much you comparatively like him.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/24 12:11 AM
38

Recruit difficulty
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/24 09:25 PM
1

Imagine telling women real details about yourself where they could track you down in one of those situations. Couldn’t be me
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/24 01:55 PM
3

Lmfao male sexuality isn’t some kind of organized union where we chase down the scabs who lower our “bargaining power”. This post is non-sensical
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/24 05:58 PM
4

Women don’t owe you attention, and you don’t owe women relationships after sex. That’s the deal
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/24 08:25 PM
-1

And there’s the hand waving as scheduled 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 11:43 PM
1

I’ll play devils advocate here: it’s like a drug dealer refusing to date a drug user. Yeah it’s messed up because the drug dealer is profiting off selling the drugs, but why would they want to date a junkie?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 04:09 PM
1

“Connecting” = having some guy beta-buxx when their SMV begins to go down
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/24 01:03 AM
1

I honestly don’t take 99% of women’s problems seriously once I became aware of this.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/24 01:02 AM
0

Why are you asking women for advice on dating women? I think women can give decent relationship advice, but advice on how to get a woman to like you initially? Used toilet paper has more utility than that advice.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/24 04:01 PM
0

Cheating is normal in 2024, the moral grandstanding on Internet forums doesn’t really capture the “true normal” of the real world. I say just go with the flow
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/24 08:29 PM
1

“Trust, but verify” - Theodore Roosevelt
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/24 02:53 PM
1

Completely agree. The red pill people here cope so hard, not only can women who are past 30 easily get dates, but even women who are involved in sex work can easily find a man to commit to them. And not just a low SMV Billy Beta, but an actually decently attractive man. The market is just that lopsided in the modern era, and it’s going to get way worse.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/24 03:42 AM
1

I agree, women that get beaten by their boyfriends or husbands are simply weak, and should be beaten as nature intended 👌
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/24 10:29 PM
8

Read better. He’s pointing out the naturalistic fallacy where people claim “what’s natural” = good.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/24 10:28 PM
2

And some women aren’t fit to have the man stick around if they get knocked up, they’re just not good enough for that, only for a quick lay.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/24 10:27 PM
1

Marriage is absolutely USELESS especially for men in todays society. A few small benefits that are largely inconsequential do not override the downsides. Don’t do it, if we want to live in a progressive culture, that’s fine, but men should refuse to entertain the traditional institutions that don’t benefit them in the context of a progressive culture.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/24 05:15 PM
1

I said it before and I’ll say it again: it’s literally impossible to draw the most basic analogies in this sub without women either pearl clutching or responding in bad faith
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/23 02:20 PM
1

Except it’s not, so I’m not going to entertain the hypothetical. Nobody for the most part is being forced into sex work, these women can go work in another industry if they don’t want to do it. I don’t feel bad for them one bit
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/23 05:07 PM
3

Making an assumption to poison the well
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/23 04:36 PM
6

It’s obvious poisoning the well sophistry. If there are places where exploitation happens, the goal should be to stop it, not throw away the whole industry
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/23 04:33 PM
13

You miss the point entirely about the fact your moral judgements on what is “good”, “bad”, or “harmful” are mostly subjective. You can’t measure the harm, a lot of people would say prostitution has benefits for them and it’s authoritarian to get between two consenting adults
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/23 04:30 PM
41

Bro yapped for several paragraphs when they could have just said this lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/23 04:28 PM
–

Goddamn you got her dead to rights 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/23 04:27 PM
17

What a goofy response. Who cares about what makes us “feel good”, we’re here discussing what the reality is
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/23 07:12 PM
-2

Nope, she’ll just chill (along with all the other younger women who will be in comfy office jobs or sell sex in some way) while disposable men continue to do these jobs for less and less. The system will keep going this way indefinitely.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/23 01:37 AM
1

Women will be fine. They make their own money now and can share Chads. Literally a 60 year old granny has more SMV than the average 25 year old guy. These dark fantasies where women will “pay their dues” aren’t going to happen at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/23 01:14 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter