TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

XYZRGBCMYK Archive

View 0 posts and 41 comments by XYZRGBCMYK on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Imagine being so retarded that you think men go fishing...to impress you. I actually can’t imagine it. I can’t imagine being this fucking stupid.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/08/20 04:38 AM
7

...... What the fuck kind of person would announce something like this to the entire world? This is the kind of shit that you take to your grave and hope no one outside your social circle discovers. That she feels comfortable writing this without shame suggests that our society has produced enough people that would view her as the victim. This is a very bad sign.
/r/PussyPassDenied31/07/20 05:39 PM
1

Yes. To help you see why this answer is correct: Observe how fat women are treated and look at the politically correct take on that ‘problem.’
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/20 12:16 AM
1

To your 1st paragraph: You are correct. I misread your sentence. I agree with the rest of your post.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/20 04:28 PM
0

Women care when a guy started fisted pumping the air out of frustration, or forgets about the basic needs of the other person, or is irritable in speech, or spends hours sobbing because who in their right mind would choose to live with someone like that? For years ago I went through a major depression. My husband didn't know what he was coming home to at the end of the day. Either me crying, or having to talk because I was upset, getting angry at perceived injustices, just all-around crappy... I…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/20 11:37 PM
1

Beta bucks/alpha fucks. They desire one of these men and have the others for other uses (money, comfort). How do you know this? The two relationship categories I mentioned cover, at minimum, millions of relationships that exist today and have existed throughout human history. It reads like you’re just making vast generalisations based on the limited data set of your personal experience. Considering the previous example you offered I doubt what you perceived was genuine desire. The previous expla…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/20 04:55 PM
2

That doesn't constitute "multiple" stats. True. It was lazily phrased. It still constitutes N+1 more stats than anyone arguing the contrary has posted on this thread. And 1% is hardly noteworthy, is it? No it isn’t. But a 10% or 11% difference is not a 1% difference and the first two differences are noteworthy. I've never thought women are serially monogamous. I believe female sex drive is much more similar to males than most men like to think. I think this is probably true. But the rate of male…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/20 03:59 PM
1

Serially monogamous means they desire one dude, then another , then another ad infinitum. They don't desire multiple men at the same time. Then women are not serially monogamous. Proof: The existence of LTRs between the same man and woman & open relationships where the woman has N+2 male sexual partners simultaneously. I've never seen a woman that cheated and then continued to desire the previous man, just like I've never seen a woman desiring two men at the same time. I have seen examples of bo…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/20 03:25 PM
1

What you describe is exactly the serially monogamous strategy of women. No it isn’t. If this is what you mean by ‘serial monogamy’ than most women are not serially monogamous. This is because most women (and men) don’t cheat. The norm is for women to be in monogamous relationships with different men at different times without cheating on any of them. This is what the statistical data on this issue suggests and that is the only data that matters when evaluating the truth or falsity of such genera…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/20 02:01 PM
1

Right. I’m saying this is false. I’ll clarify with an example: W is in a ‘monogamous’ relationship with M. W cheats on M with Y. W breaks up with M and repeats step 1 (with Y replacing M). W cheats on Y with Z. W breaks up with Y and dates someone else (who may or may not be identical to Z). I put ‘monogamous’ in quotes above because I don’t regard a person who behaves like W to have been in a genuinely monogamous relationship in such cases. They’re a serial cheater who has been in relationships…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/20 11:40 AM
2

Young women aged 18-29* are more likely to cheat (10-11%) than their male counterparts in that age. . The IFS and the Cut both note that women’s self reported infidelity has increased by about 40% since the 90s. These facts refute the claim that women are ‘serially monogamous’.** *Yes the original comment was lazily phrased (e.g. ‘young women’ & ‘women’ do not denote the same set of women). But the main point of the post still holds. **If you disagree then you should also disagree with statement…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/20 11:13 AM
5

I do. Is moral consistency a new concept to you people?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/20 10:22 AM
3

........ You’re making this comment on a thread where the OP has multiple stats showing that women are more likely cheat than men. How can you read those links and continue to believe that women are ‘serially monogamous’?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/20 04:28 AM
6

Women are actively oppressed, so we men can take a few jokes at our expense, especially when it's just jokes. Sure. But FDS isn’t just jokes. It encourages shitty , abusive and generally morally repulsive behaviour. Being ‘oppressed’ doesn’t justify being a piece of shit. There's nothing lenient about MGTOW shit, it's sincerely about hating women. It’s fairly obvious that a large % of FDS hates men. The handbook explicitly rejects "liberal feminism", and even then I don't see why it matters. TIL…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/20 03:33 AM
1

I didn't run a consensus for it though. Census?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/20 03:56 PM
1

All those have gotten substantially worse over the past 30 years.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/20 03:52 PM
21

You can always pull a Jenner. Thanks to recent advancements in identity politics you don’t even have to go that far.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/05/20 12:00 PM
1

By telling your employer. This is an alarmingly stupid question. There are many cases where ordinary men have been victimised for speaking publicly about their preference in women. Some of them have been posted on this thread. Searching for more on google isn’t that fucking hard. You have an internet connection. Get to it.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/20 09:10 PM
0

We know they do it. The point is that the social repercussions for doing it differ depending on the gender of the person (if it’s a woman, they’re almost nonexistent). For examples of those repercussions, scroll up in this thread. This is hypocritical on the part of society and on the part of the individual women. It also justifies men not giving a shit when women complain about this.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/20 08:58 PM
6

No problem. I actually think your comments on this thread have been very good. You seem like a remarkably patient person. Keep fighting the good fight.👍
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/20 11:09 PM
18

“Your standards are too high.” “So you’re saying women should put up with abuse?!” Huh. Interesting.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/20 09:43 PM
1

Right. But the question was about women who are not attracted to men who do chores. Why do women who feel this way insist on lying about it in public? Scroll up in this thread and you’ll find multiple links to studies showing that men who do less housework get more sex from their partners. In fact, the more housework married men did, the greater their chances of divorce. Should we interpret responses like yours as a denial that this is a thing that happens?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/20 08:49 PM
1

“Sorry, but I don't believe in "nice guys finish last" stuff, mostly because I've seen enough nice guys, who were nice only by their own opinion.” This isn’t a reason to think nice guys don’t finish last. If your perception of those men is accurate then they were not nice guys. So their performance in the dating pool gives us no information about the performance of nice guys (defined by sir_manalot). Of course, this changes if they actually were nice guys and your perception is mistaken.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/20 08:32 PM
-1

“The wording of this is odd to me. It implies that there is a "main chore-do'er", and the man assists that person.” There is. That person is usually a woman. That’s just a fact about the distribution of labour in the home. Until recently, the norm for heterosexual relationships was: men work full time & women are stay at home partners or part time workers. This distribution of labour is self evidently justified in such relationships (all things being equal). “I think I'd have to get used to seri…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/20 03:13 PM
1

Derrida may have a good person to those who knew him but his thinking was always utter trash. Judith Butler is not much better.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/03/20 02:36 PM
3

In my experience, it’s mostly women that do this.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/03/20 02:07 PM
1

Yeah I’ve seen a few guys like this. Your friend is likely a victim of a morally broken culture.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/03/20 04:30 AM
1

It also means “women” as a group will continue to lose that fight since men will continue to objectify women. Because 1) men know that women’s complaint isn’t the objectification itself & 2) each man thinks (at least initially) that he’s one of the men that some woman would find attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/20 02:03 AM
1

This may be true but it in no way refutes their point. However, it does provide an excellent explanation for why the problems that arise from women’s objectification will continue for the foreseeable future.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/20 12:27 AM
1

Why? It’s not like gay guys want sex more than straight guys. It’s just that gay men behave with each other how straight men would behave with women if the women would let them. If anything their sex lives are more evidence that the sex drive differences we observe in men and women are ultimately explained by biology rather than society.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/20 12:19 AM
1

That’s because men generally have a higher sex drive than women. Given that lesbians are women and gay guys are guys, your experience is to be expected.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/20 12:08 AM
1

I read your opening post several times and I still don’t quite get it. Genuine question: Why do you think that if a man wants a woman as a sexual partner then her only value to him must be as a sexual partner?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/20 11:56 PM
1

Eh. Most guys to post about ‘alpha vs beta males’ online would never stand up for anything if they knew doing so would likely get them killed by crucification.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/20 11:46 PM
1

“There are not enough rich men in the world for that to be true.” This is false. It’s perfectly possible that in any heterosexual dating pool 1) most of the women will try to date the richest men & 2) there exists no injective function from the set of rich men to the set of women in that dating pool. Compare: “There are only a few students at your university who are also Victoria Secret models. Most male students i) actively try to fuck them or ii) would fuck them if given the chance (but don’t …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/20 11:27 PM
2

“For whatever reason that led me me getting a response of why don't women date homeless men..” ..... You’re responding to a post that just explained why you received that response. “Poor men have a harder time doing a lot of things not just finding dates.” Consider: ‘Double leg amputees have a harder time doing a lot of things not just running marathons.’ The context: An equivalent discussion about the difficulties double leg amputees have with running. Both statements are true. Nothing positive…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/20 10:17 PM
0

Why does a man wanting to fuck you mean you can’t respect him? Do you think seeing someone as a potential sex partner is inconsistent with viewing that person in some other way (e.g. friend, cowoker etc)?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/20 09:33 PM
2

Holy Shit! 😂😂Shots fired!🤣🤣🤣
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/20 12:34 PM
2

Serious question: why do you think this statement is more probable than its negation?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/20 06:35 AM
3

Eh I can see the other person’s point. For many people ‘I don’t care about others’ is a stance that is performative and repressive. You do care about the opinions of others, you just pretend not to (performance) & you keep telling yourself that you don’t care but deep down you know you do (repression). Then there are people who genuinely don’t care what other people think of them and, as a result, are basically impossible to reason with. Example: men who causes a scene by getting aggressive/viol…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/20 12:15 PM
5

‘Women desire the approval of men they’re attracted to.’ lol I think this follows from the more general fact that people desire the approval of people they’re attracted to.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/20 10:47 AM
5

‘Many of them are white, black or some other race!’🤔
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/19 02:30 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter