TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Xanza Archive

View 0 posts and 59 comments by Xanza on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

For anyone wondering; this is completely legal and there's nothing her bank will do about it. Applications like CashApp are not apart of your banks ecosystem and transactions which are not fraudulent are not protected by FDIC insurance. She lost her money and there's nothing that's going to be done about it. That's why using applications like CashApp are dangerous.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/02/21 07:16 PM
3

No! You owe me $400! I'm a manwhore!
/r/PussyPassDenied06/09/20 02:22 AM
2

Wanna bet?
/r/MensRights04/08/20 01:55 PM
2

“The district attorney will make the determination if the male should be charged or if it was self-defense,” Filippi said. The girl declined medical attention. Man bad, girl good.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/05/20 04:41 PM
-4

Not all breasts are female, my dude.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/04/20 03:43 PM
21

WHAT ARE THEY GON' DO? ARREST ME? Her, probably.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/03/20 04:47 AM
5

Because their entire lives they've been told "boys can't hit girls" so they act up with the wrong dude and never expect what's coming. I don't think any person should touch another person without their consent. But if a woman rolled up on me and started hitting me? You better believe I'd defend myself. I don't care if you have a vagina or not.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/03/20 02:46 PM
1

Yall need to stop using Chivalry if you're not going to use it correctly... It's a code of ethics for Knights and not a single of its rules even says the word "Woman" let alone is about women. Thou shalt believe all that the Church teaches and thou shalt observe all its directions. Thou shalt defend the Church. Thou shalt respect all weaknesses, and shalt constitute thyself the defender of them. Thou shalt love the country in which thou wast born. Thou shalt not recoil before thine enemy. Thou s…
/r/PussyPassDenied02/02/20 12:51 AM
2

It's not symbolic. The judge effectively gave a life sentence. 99 years is probably just the de facto life sentence in Texas.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/03/19 05:31 PM
1

Not only that, but she's lived her entire life beyond the wall. Why would (outside of the context of that scene) anyone think she actually knew the history of Westeros?
/r/MensRights16/08/17 09:13 PM
6

Influence of religion. Know another place that allows you to marry off 14 year olds? The Middle East. Bazinga!
/r/PussyPassDenied25/07/17 08:29 AM
49

feminism isn't about hating men or blaming them lol tell that to feminists, the vast majority of the younger ones seem to have missed that memo.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/07/17 08:28 AM
1

This is actually a really good turn of events. When she's evaluated and found to definitively not have a mental illness then the judge is just going to see that as an attempt to subvert a sentence. He/she probably isn't going to go easy on her. That and it sets precedence that claiming "mental illness" in cases like this is bullshit.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/07/17 11:58 PM
8

I really don't think so. The woman suffrage movement (and others) had every right to focus solely on women--as they were an oppressed minority. But that's not really the case anymore (IMO, anyways). We have an expectation of diversity even in fields which aren't diverse. Which is...dumb. The Feminist movement these days has devolved from "women deserve equal rights!" to "take rights away from men so women are superior because we, as a gender, haven't always been equal!" Susan B. Anthony is a rea…
/r/PussyPassDenied01/07/17 02:34 PM
7

I mean, it's not as if I'm trying to say Feminism is evil, or something. Men and women should be treated equally as people. But if your only attachment to your movement is through its name, then you're movement is of no value. So I really think a true feminist is someone who realizes that calling yourself a feminist doesn't automatically lend you credibility in the avenue that you believe in equal rights. You have to be cognizant to the fact that if you're entirely for one group to the point whe…
/r/PussyPassDenied01/07/17 01:16 PM
29

Feminism is inherently anti-equality. No matter how you slice it. The movement is there to ensure that Women are treated equally to Men--but is completely silent for any situation in which Men are unequal to Women. Saying that Feminism is for equality is the same as saying Stalinism is for freedom. It's empirically not true by any measure other than face value to those who consider themselves apart of that group.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/07/17 01:07 PM
2

I love humor. I even think calling people cunts, under the right circumstances can be hilarious. But would you call someone a cunt at your grandmothers funeral, or little brothers high school graduation a cunt then complain that people can't take a joke? There's a time and a place. Especially so when you want to be taken seriously. I think you're entirely forgetting that. The end of the response in the image is nothing but a childish crack against anyone who has a vagina simply for the reason th…
/r/MensRights16/06/17 06:58 AM
7

This is a serious sub about MensRights. Not calling women cunts because it's funny. That's on the same level of third wave feminists saying all men are rapists then wonder why they're not taken seriously.
/r/MensRights16/06/17 06:00 AM
21

but I'm all for it as long as it's funny as fuck You're 100% in the wrong sub for that kind of bullshit.
/r/MensRights16/06/17 04:52 AM
1

This bitch will have a new phone and a new number. She will need a new username, new email address, new telephone number, new credit card number, and new mailing address (tied to the credit card) for everything to work right. Not all that easy--but essentially everything Uber could have done.
/r/MensRights07/04/17 11:59 PM
0

You're the only one suggesting she jump from a moving car. If he started to drive somewhere she didn't want to go, and refused to pull over to let her out what other choice would she have to exit the vehicle? There in-lies my point and why my original post specifically stated it would be a terrible fucking idea to do this.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/04/17 05:34 AM
-1

He wasnt trying to detain her at all though I'm not saying he was. I'm saying if he would have driven her to a police station, as everyone is saying he should have, and refused to let her out during the drive, she could have sued him for unlawful detention. You guys just refuse to read anything.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/04/17 05:33 AM
1

The uber driver can terminate the service at any time. He sure can. He can even call the police on her. He might even be able to sue her for compensatory damages. But he can't force her to go somewhere she didn't contract him to go. If you're that interested in it, you should call Uber HQ and ask them about it.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/04/17 05:32 AM
1

You people are taking this way out of proportion. I'm not saying that her refusing to leave the vehicle is unlawful detention--which you all seem to be implying. (because its easy to discredit what someone is saying if you absolutely don't read anything they say) That would be fucking insane. I'm saying that if he were to start driving to the police station, which was not her destination as set by Uber to which he agreed to drive her as per his contract with Uber, and then refused to stop on the…
/r/PussyPassDenied05/04/17 05:28 AM
1

If they don't want to get out, you're allowed to still travel in your vehicle. Okay. How about this analogy. Have your neighbor pay you to watch her children. Suppose you say you want these children to leave, and they refuse. Now remove your close exposing yourself to children and go in front of a jury and say "but I gave them an out and they refused to leave! It's still my property! They refused to leave, I can't commit a crime on my own property! Then get back to me if you have to register as …
/r/PussyPassDenied05/04/17 05:25 AM
-1

She can leave his car at any time. Really? How about while its moving between the place where the video cuts out and the police station that everyone is suggesting he drive her to? You think a jury would think it feasible for her to have to jump from a moving car to remove herself from his vehicle while he was driving her against her will to the police station, or do you think they might just say "his actions were specifically and intentionally forcing her to be in his car against her will" and …
/r/PussyPassDenied05/04/17 05:22 AM
1

This is clearly not true, as the driver would love nothing more than the woman to get out of his vehicle Hiring an Uber and refusing to leave isn't illegal. If however, he started to drive to a police station and he refused to stop to let her out then its absolutely 100% unlawful detention. 99% of people replying to this thread have what I liked to call should be syndrome. They see the world for how it should be and not how it is. Yes. She's the bad guy for being a cunt. He would have been just …
/r/PussyPassDenied05/04/17 05:18 AM
0

No, they're absolutely not. Which is why I keep saying he did the right thing by pulling over and not moving until she got out of his car. But that doesn't mean that just because they refuse to get out that you can just drive them wherever you please, including a police station.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/04/17 05:03 AM
3

Can't get repairs without a report. Can't get a report without being berated. Ouch. I feel for you, brother.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/04/17 04:46 AM
1

But he offered to let her out and she didn't get out. So if I drive an Uber and offer to let you out after you get in, and then shoot you in the head I'm totally not going to be charged with murder because I gave you the opportunity to let you out? You can't just not commit a crime which is a crime because you "gave them an out," and they didn't take it. She hired him to take her somewhere. He had every right to do what he did. He does not have the right to drive her somewhere she didn't ask him…
/r/PussyPassDenied05/04/17 04:41 AM
0

If she refuses state I am now heading to the police station for my safety. It's an Uber. She hired him to drive her somewhere. If you did this, the only place you'd be going to was jail... I fully encourage you to try it in the exact same capacity.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/04/17 04:39 AM
-1

It's idiotic to think taking her to a police station would be construed as detaining her against her will. I'm starting to think you didn't watch the video. She hired him as an Uber to take her someone which wasn't a police station. How are you children not understanding this?
/r/PussyPassDenied05/04/17 04:38 AM
-6

All he has to do is say "I'm driving you to a police station, if at any time you want to exit my vehicle, let me know and I will stop and let you out." At no time anywhere in this thread has anyone suggested he do it while saying this. So sure, if you want to pull bullshit scenarios into it then yea, of course you're right. But if you don't let them out then it absolutely and unequivocally is unlawful detention... It's a rideshare. She hired him for a service--it's not like she's a complete stra…
/r/PussyPassDenied05/04/17 04:37 AM
0

Replying with the same thing over and over is getting tiring; Then he would have been unlawfully detaining someone against their will. Last time I checked that's a felony. You can't just hold someone captive in your car and drive them to wherever you want without their permission. Regardless of how big of a cunt they are.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/04/17 04:23 AM
0

Then he would have been unlawfully detaining someone against their will. Last time I checked that's a felony. You can't just hold someone captive in your car and drive them to wherever you want without their permission. Regardless of how big of a cunt they are.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/04/17 04:22 AM
-1

So your solution to this would be for the driver, who was totally in the right to commit a felony (terroristic threat) and that would have "solved" his problem?
/r/PussyPassDenied05/04/17 04:21 AM
3

You watch too much television.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/04/17 04:21 AM
-1

Sure. But then he would have been holding her against her will and she could have sued him? Just because it would have been morally right, doesn't make it legal.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/04/17 04:20 AM
470

Because if you call the police in the Bronx, and say "I have a belligerent woman in my vehicle who is threatening to assault me," they'll kindly say, "We'll send someone out as soon as we can--in about 45 minutes." Some of you people replying to this post need a reality check. No matter how much of a cunt she was being, driving her to the police station against her will and refusing to stop if she asked would be unlawful detention; Unlawful detention means keeping in custody unlawfully. Under cr…
/r/PussyPassDenied04/04/17 10:10 PM
0

She committed no crime--she's just a total cunt. Why would she go to jail for this?
/r/PussyPassDenied04/04/17 10:09 PM
1

They're not trying to stop the divorce. They're trying to stop the divorce for the reasons she filed for--which would automatically entitle her to 50% of marital assets.
/r/MensRights27/03/17 12:08 AM
1

Exactly, thanks for finally recognizing exactly what I've been telling you all along; I never said anything about Canada until you did. So you've literally been fighting with me right now over something you not only just admitted to, but is in full view of the public and anyone can run up and see exactly what transpired. It doesn't make any goddamn sense. I honestly cannot understand why you're still here...
/r/MensRights23/02/17 11:02 PM
1

You're a seriously delusional person. I said that something that you said was un-American, to which you replied that it wasn't weird because you were Canadian. Then you rattled off a huge list of bullshit about why Canada is cool and America isn't. It's right fucking there. Just go look.
/r/MensRights23/02/17 07:39 PM
1

That's absolutely bullshit and you know it. The posts here are public, anyone can go up and read what I said and know that's a lie. I never said anything Canada until you did. What the hell is the matter with you.
/r/MensRights23/02/17 05:20 AM
1

What the ever loving fuck does any of that have to do with absolutely anything? We get it, you have a hate boner for America. I personally couldn't fucking care less. but maybe that's me being an entitled douchebag Yes, you absolutely still are an entitled douchebag. That hasn't changed in the past few days....
/r/MensRights19/02/17 05:34 PM
1

Canadian, huh? Then I guess it makes sense that your view of the world is pretty fucked up. It's not about me being entitled It has everything to do with you being absolutely entitled. And it's become impossibly pathetic and boring...
/r/MensRights17/02/17 08:22 PM
1

No, you're a douchebag for trying to imply that a company somehow owes you so much, just for being successful, that they need to give away their rights as a company so you can maintain whatever rights (right or wrong) that you feel that you're owed. It's the most entitled bullshit I've ever seen and quite frankly it's entirely un-American. You don't get to demand that other people give away their rights. Why are you so threatened by the idea that corporation should have some level of accountabil…
/r/MensRights17/02/17 02:21 AM
1

when a company becomes powerful enough to actually govern how people live, its not really private, it's a form of government This is so fucking stupid it's goddamn pathetic. It's Twitter you douchebag. It's not "governing the way people live," if you don't fucking like what Twitter is about then don't use it. You have that right, just like Twitter has every right to tell people what they can and cannot discuss on a platform which they wholly and solely own. I promise you won't die.
/r/MensRights12/02/17 02:43 AM
1

Publicly traded company just means that they are beholden to shareholders. That doesn't mean that they're exclusively owned by the public and are therefore bound buy some Unwritten rule to protect public interest. Besides, censorship deals with speech hindered by government, not by a public or private company. What Twitter is doing is not censorship. Don't be an idiot.
/r/MensRights11/02/17 11:12 PM
10

Sorry, but this isn't true at all. If you actually read the Twitter TOS they can ban any account for just about bullshit these days. If they said anything which made someone even so much as feel uncomfortable then Twitter could ban them for that. I think people forget that Twitter is a private organization... They can literally do whatever the fuck they want with their platform. I'm not advocating what's been done here--I just think it's stupid to throw around conjecture when you have absolutely…
/r/MensRights09/02/17 05:46 AM
1

My wife is never enthusiastic You rapist! /s
/r/MensRights12/01/17 11:25 PM
8

This is actually a larger issue than people make it out to be. The criticism of the poster in question is that there are exactly two adults in this picture and exactly one are being held to standards of responsibility--which could ruin their entire lives over a stupid mistake they both made. The argument is that consent cannot be given while intoxicated so if intoxicated and consent is given the woman can't be held responsible for saying it was okay. But you as a man can have your entire life le…
/r/MensRights12/01/17 06:16 PM
1

This depends if it was a public or private school, and whether or not there was a female dress code. If it was a public school, then maybe. If private, then no. Additionally, if it was a public school with a dress code, and this was never done for the boys, then yes, this is a clear violation of title IX. It's perfectly fine for a principal to do dress code checks in a public school which has a dress code, but to do it strictly for the girls and not boys is a violation. And sexist to boot, IMO.
/r/MensRights21/10/16 09:04 PM
4

Because the movie is terrible on its own merits. We even predicted it to be a bad film. What did Hollywood do with that information? Call everyone misogynists and farther removed people from wanting to see it.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/07/16 11:16 AM
6

It needs to be a crime all on its own. The very fact that it's legal to defame someone off of no evidence and possibly even get them arrested strictly from accusation is beyond my understanding.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/01/16 12:02 PM
0

Um. No. That's obviously not what I meant. If the officer isn't doing what they're supposed to be doing, it benefits the public. If the public isn't doing the right thing, it benefits the officer. If the officer isn't doing what they're supposed to be doing, how is it benefiting them personally to have footage of their misdeeds available to their superiors? Same with the public. Expedient trial if you have footage.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/11/15 04:55 AM
1

Officer bodycams benefit everyone. You should amend this: Officer bodycams benefit everyone doing the right thing.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/11/15 01:55 AM
1

It would be harmful to Reddit's business model to start banning quality subs willy-nilly. Reddit still isn't making a profit. They're expenses far outweigh any money gained through advertising and Gold sales. If we so much as make a single investor think about pulling funding, then we've won. Cooler heads nothing. This is a fight that Reddit cannot win.
/r/MensRights12/06/15 05:52 AM
0

Girl 3: The one that got away. HB8, Met her and then a few days later said "Hey, gimme your number, we're going out next week." She gave me her number but seemed hesitant. Ended up ignoring my texts. First real rejection, stingsbro. She stood you up because you were a dick. Being confident is fine, and saying shit like we're going on a date is really risky to begin with. Some women get off on stuff like that. Other women, like this one, regard you as an idiot and never want to speak to you again…
/r/seduction22/08/13 03:28 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter