TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

XisanXbeforeitsakiss Archive

View 1 post and 301 comments by XisanXbeforeitsakiss on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
225

XisanXbeforeitsakiss/r/PussyPassDenied18/09/17 03:43 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

shawwwwww. it deters me, im nothing special. suck an egg.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/08/19 06:18 PM
1

of course there are people out there who are deterred by it. and you keep it so as to build a good community because the bad people get taken away.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/08/19 05:27 PM
3

people who arent deterred are irrelevant to the idea since theyll be the ones locked up as a result of their own actions. people should be held accountable for their actions and government has a responsibility to keep people safe from repeat offenders.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/08/19 04:20 PM
3

yes, three strike rule makes sense to me as an incentive for people not to do crimes and as a deterant for criminals not to do a third crime.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/08/19 03:51 PM
2

real shame to have chosen to commit those crimes and have consequences for them.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/08/19 03:49 PM
2

he was sentenced to 25 for his third strike, and someone who doesnt have the clout to not steal pizza from a child, after two prior felony strikes doesnt have the clout to not commit crimes. dude only served 6 of his 25 years sentence and on release committed a further four seperate incidents of crimes. when you got your second strike, thats when you really need to fix up and take a long look in the mirror right, and if you do that and still commit crimes or do that and not move out of state, or…
/r/PussyPassDenied09/08/19 02:46 PM
2

im reading that pizza thief guy was realeased a long time before 25 years, and went on to commit a four seperate other crimes which could have led to him being inprisoned for life but didnt. so, looks like pizza guy might be an example you should strike from memory.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/08/19 02:33 PM
2

cant say id want to put the case forward of Mr. Williams whos prior convictions for robbery, attempted robbery, drug possession and unauthorized use of a vehicle and then decided to steal pizza from a child as a worthy example of not having a three strike rule. theres statistical data out there that supports a three strike law when its disproportionately X % of criminals doing X % of the crime. *some googling implies that judges in cali where that guy is, do have discretion and means to maneuver…
/r/PussyPassDenied09/08/19 02:24 PM
1

it encourages people to not commit a third crime, or to move away from the state making the neighborhood better.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/08/19 02:07 PM
10

Selma alabama has a three strikes and life in prison law, so probably his third strike. i can see the merit in a three strike law.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/08/19 11:36 AM
38

ah, yeah, the end where nothing happens.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/09/17 06:22 PM
2

yeah, you say that but my local news paper post about it yesterday got 150 doots. id trade your no vote for the 12k votes this one got. r/karmacourt here i come.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/09/17 11:59 PM
2

german engineering. chronosphere.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/08/17 11:01 PM
6

would someone tl;dr this nonsense for me? whole lot of spaz up there and i havent seen PP on my front page for a long time. something changed?
/r/PussyPass27/02/17 11:37 AM
18

did you full metal blanket soap beatdown?
/r/PussyPass22/09/16 02:38 PM
6

coz women reddit too you know.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/07/16 10:44 PM
1

anger management, in the probation office. a semi circle of people sat in chairs listening to probation officers drone on about ways to control anger.
/r/PussyPass28/06/16 02:20 AM
1

court mandated down the local probation office.
/r/PussyPass27/06/16 11:39 PM
1

trivial crimes, and where im from the 3 strike out thing is ludicrous, no PP as far as im concerned. anger management and fines seem fitting punishment to me.
/r/PussyPass27/06/16 11:28 PM
1

frustrating experience for me. got thrown out once for sitting on a chair with my chest on the back rest. another time i spent all night doing course work followed by a day of study and i get called out for being stoned, 'your eyes are bleary, you must be stoned.'
/r/PussyPass27/06/16 11:27 PM
1

1, 1.3 and 1.4 can all be subjective. if its subjective then it can be culturally defined.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/02/16 07:15 PM
1

http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/logic multiple cases for where logic can be subjective found in the definition of the word logic in the oxford english dictionary.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/02/16 06:53 PM
1

the rebel alliance is a terrorist group. dont know anyone who would call the rebel alliance unethical.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/02/16 06:15 AM
1

http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/logic multiple cases for where logic can be subjective found in the definition of the word logic in the oxford english dictionary. what more is there to be said?
/r/PussyPassDenied03/02/16 06:07 AM
1

yep
/r/PussyPassDenied03/02/16 05:53 AM
-2

got to value the comments of pussypassdenied,.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/02/16 07:54 PM
0

whats logical to me might not be logical to someone else, simple as that right?
/r/PussyPassDenied02/02/16 07:39 PM
1

it wont help you to underxstand
/r/PussyPassDenied02/02/16 07:11 PM
0

more to logic than math.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/02/16 06:46 PM
0

you misunderstand.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/02/16 06:33 PM
-4

so the point stands.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/02/16 06:17 PM
-10

dont know what that means, dont care to look it up.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/02/16 06:15 PM
-6

wikipidia has several different types of logic listed. good enough for logic being subjective?
/r/PussyPassDenied02/02/16 06:14 PM
-10

every culture has its own philosophies. pretty reasonable to say that logic is subjective.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/02/16 05:51 PM
-10

how many snackbars must i scream at you before you understand that it is?
/r/PussyPassDenied02/02/16 05:48 PM
-9

i dont have one of those.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/02/16 05:22 PM
-10

dispicable is subjective.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/02/16 05:20 PM
-5

muh terrorist handkerchief.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/02/16 04:49 PM
-19

logic is subjective, as is belief. anyone who takes action for a cause that they believe in is noble.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/02/16 04:44 PM
-26

palestines a fucked up situation, i can see why somebody would support hamas.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/02/16 03:12 PM
2

host always plays the devils advocate here, oft to both sides.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/02/16 08:29 AM
4

can we get a link that isnt an image of a video playback?
/r/PussyPassDenied30/10/15 05:11 PM
4

just hang around town and act retarded. youll get yours soon enough.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/10/15 08:28 PM
1

im not buying what you are selling.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/10/15 12:37 AM
2

mrw
/r/PussyPassDenied17/10/15 11:27 PM
-1

an even quicker google search displays the definition for electrocute above and before all other links. i wondered if it was a english/american dictionary thing but that doesnt seem to be the case since both google.co.uk and .com use the same definition for the word. im more drawn to the oxford english dictionary definition cuz im a brit. nay for shock. (?) *collins and merriam like the kill thing. guess it is a uk/american thing. merriam should change their definition of electrocute. 'electrosh…
/r/PussyPassDenied17/10/15 11:11 PM
-8

dictionary says kill or injure. what you call shock is definitly an injury. yay for electrocute.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/10/15 10:55 PM
-2

should have sued.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/10/15 09:22 PM
-4

youre right. best shoot her instead, fear for life etc.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/07/15 07:19 PM
-7

yo might want to skip mod tags if youre going to type like that. see https://www.reddit.com/r/pussypassdenied/comments/3ccbr9/this_is_not_rbeatingwomen/csu9tak *just saw the AMA. i done goofed.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/07/15 10:54 PM
7

if i was going to be a rapist i wouldnt limit myself like that.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/03/15 10:14 PM
21

because rapists rape. thats what they do.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/03/15 09:27 PM
2

naw. you gave me 20, so thats my 20.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/01/15 05:40 PM
2

so if you were to give a barman 20 for your 3.55 drink then its only right for that barman to shoe you off when you get in a huff about your missing 16.45.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/01/15 12:32 AM
2

nope, bank would take the money back by whatever means. withholding the erroneous 1000 would be unlawful in the uk.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/01/15 12:27 AM
1

the courts apply interest, so far as mistakes made - she is the one guilty of an offence.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/01/15 12:24 AM
3

truth is, that £5 you find on the street is not yours to pick up. there is no law of finders keepers, all money is accountable and there are procedures which are meant to be followed in order to return that fiver to its rightful owner.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/01/15 12:20 AM
3

reads like they are only charging interest on the amount spent. i understand typical court applied interest rates are in the region of 10%.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/01/15 12:17 AM
-12

who are you to yay a box cutter and ney a tin can lid?
/r/MensRights10/11/14 11:03 PM
-11

sporks, potato pealers and tin can lids - these are deadly weapons.
/r/MensRights10/11/14 10:46 PM
-12

got any other crap to ctrl v me? you should edit it down to make it pertinent.
/r/MensRights10/11/14 09:27 PM
-22

terrorism? calm yourself. assault with a deadly weapon? please, its a box cutter.
/r/MensRights10/11/14 09:13 PM
-15

kiss our collective arses, you ponce.
/r/MensRights29/09/14 11:55 AM
23

and theres a wonder why this gender pay gap is when business women create endeavours like this that cut off 50% of their potential revenue.
/r/MensRights28/09/14 10:23 AM
2

dip. why you call them a feminist? why you call them an idiot? why you say they hate men? dingus.
/r/MensRights18/08/14 04:20 PM
-4

18 assaults is nothing major. spitting at someone thats assault, not fit for prison. punching someone leaving a mark - not fit for prison. pushing someone over, thats assult - not fit for prison. *furthermore, her last recorded offence was when she was 17, 4 years prior.
/r/MensRights18/08/14 12:55 PM
1

you smell and your mother dresses you funny.
/r/MensRights06/07/14 01:38 PM
1

you never had anything intelligent to say and your mother is bs and she is discrimination.
/r/MensRights06/07/14 12:59 PM
1

your mother is bs and discrimination.
/r/MensRights06/07/14 10:13 AM
1

with all the sum of knowledge and experiences i have with the female anatomy, im yet to encounter a chick with a dick. women cant commit rape in england.
/r/MensRights06/07/14 01:37 AM
1

you need to tune your definition into the law. the law doesnt work around you. there is no discrimination.
/r/MensRights05/07/14 07:56 PM
1

women dont have penises. in england, it is not possible for a woman to rape a man. this is not difficult, ive already typed it so many times, ill keep at it till you understand or bog off.
/r/MensRights05/07/14 03:36 PM
1

fool. A person (A) commits an offence if— (a)he intentionally penetrates the vagina, anus or mouth of another person (B) with his penis, (b)B does not consent to the penetration, and (c)A does not reasonably believe that B consents. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2003/42/section/1
/r/MensRights05/07/14 01:52 AM
1

no it isnt. i just told you what english rape is.
/r/MensRights04/07/14 11:25 PM
1

women cant rape, women dont have penises. its not discrimination, its definition. cake means cake, chocolate is chocolate, rape is forcible penetration using a penis against someones will.
/r/MensRights04/07/14 07:35 PM
1

because it isnt unjust or prejudiced.
/r/MensRights04/07/14 03:44 PM
0

not discrimination. rape is defined as using a penis to penetrate against someones will.
/r/MensRights04/07/14 08:38 AM
1

nope.
/r/MensRights29/06/14 09:20 AM
1

thats exactly what that guy was doing when he typed blatantly false.
/r/MensRights28/06/14 11:31 PM
0

none of them will help here. dumbo.
/r/MensRights28/06/14 11:11 PM
0

ah, the moon and the stars aligned to show you the truth.
/r/MensRights28/06/14 10:38 PM
-1

zero evidence, thats what you have to say that its false. so to call it blatantly false is rather daft.
/r/MensRights28/06/14 05:17 PM
-6

this makes it false how?
/r/MensRights28/06/14 02:27 PM
0

whats blatantly false about this example?
/r/MensRights28/06/14 01:10 PM
0

did you know that prior to this he was jailed before for the same offence?
/r/MensRights28/06/14 12:58 PM
-2

10 years of couch sitting, exercise, home cooking, free degree, tv, masturbation. sounds good right?
/r/MensRights27/06/14 07:58 PM
1

basically, i dont think you understand much about murder.
/r/MensRights27/06/14 04:46 PM
-13

rapists are typically men. you got a problem with that?
/r/MensRights27/06/14 04:36 PM
1

not in uk. merican jury didnt buy that either.
/r/MensRights18/06/14 04:22 PM
3

if she never intended to kill then she cant be charged with attempted murder, aggravated assault - threatening someone with a knife,m easy to see why a jury might take exception to that.
/r/MensRights18/06/14 10:01 AM
1

friends and family statements of character mean jack shit if hes an abuser behind closed doors.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 02:09 PM
-43

this guy is a dip. id have jumped at the opportunity to throw that girl into the gutter.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 09:17 PM
-2

you got a problem with 'shaming language'?
/r/MensRights08/03/14 01:33 PM
-4

nobody cares about beiber cock more than /u/zimbazumba. suck up.
/r/MensRights08/03/14 01:48 AM
50

you can change your language in the settings menu.
/r/MensRights20/02/14 07:31 PM
0

yeah, its a boat load of bull, but it has its merits too.
/r/MensRights14/02/14 11:53 PM
2

that wikipedia bit does a good job at saying the pitfalls of pornography though.
/r/MensRights14/02/14 11:10 PM
1

nope. its written above that im not for it either. if im not for something and im not against something, then theres only one option left isnt there, and you got it wrong.
/r/MensRights14/02/14 08:10 PM
1

what hypocrisy?
/r/MensRights14/02/14 08:07 PM
1

nope.
/r/MensRights14/02/14 08:03 PM
1

im not.
/r/MensRights14/02/14 07:50 PM
1

just saying what springs to mind when i think of redpill. its just a thought. didnt bother him, doesnt bother me, does it bother you?
/r/MensRights14/02/14 07:49 PM
1

not even phased a bit.
/r/MensRights14/02/14 07:40 PM
1

sure.
/r/MensRights14/02/14 07:40 PM
1

if your bit of paper is backed in law then sure, everyone gets to be your subject.
/r/MensRights14/02/14 07:32 PM
1

aye, why do you think id lose my shit if someone said to me that they imagine redpillers to be sexual tyranosaurs or someone called me a sexual deviant?
/r/MensRights14/02/14 07:29 PM
1

dont know why youd think you know my stance on anything enough to call me a hypocrite.
/r/MensRights14/02/14 07:21 PM
1

awesome. so how do corporations fit here?
/r/MensRights14/02/14 07:19 PM
1

ive never called anyone a bigot, dont see how my comment makes me a hypocrite either.
/r/MensRights14/02/14 07:17 PM
1

looks like youve been swallowing some horse crap. people as corporations? bureaucratic jiving?
/r/MensRights14/02/14 07:00 PM
0

my imagination is not an accusation.
/r/MensRights14/02/14 02:12 AM
-1

i didnt want to dip into the idea of love because thatd just be too muddy and i totally agree with you on the moral aspect of telling someone about gender reassignment.
/r/MensRights14/02/14 01:46 AM
0

no ones accusing you of anything, you are mistaken. i wouldnt say jedi mind tricks, id say jawa dell boys. peddlers of knock off second hand wares.
/r/MensRights14/02/14 01:42 AM
0

seems that way.
/r/MensRights14/02/14 01:00 AM
-1

red pill guy screams sexual deviant to me, one who coerces people into his bed through disingenuous subversion; if voodoo was a thing, youd use it. thats the image i conjure up whenever i see redpiller.
/r/MensRights14/02/14 12:59 AM
3

i agree with you, its all in the title question 'why are MRAs not the strongest supporters of trans issues?' it reeks of concern. but then that could also be a result of confining myself to my four walls.
/r/MensRights14/02/14 12:27 AM
2

i cross posted this question because i wanted to gauge the reactions of /r/MensRights myself and see how it compared to OPs perception of the sub. it only takes a few people with a few comments similar in ilk to yours to see how OP might have come to their conclusions.
/r/MensRights13/02/14 11:23 PM
-6

all is fair in love and war. people are responsible for their own actions, jumping into bed with someone based on nothing more than physical attraction is in all respects a silly thing to do anyway. id like to accidentally sex a transexual, i have no idea how id respond, the emotional play would be life affirming.
/r/MensRights13/02/14 11:19 PM
-4

muddy isnt it. love, passion, desire, its a tricky business.
/r/MensRights13/02/14 11:05 PM
5

you should click that link under the title, then click full comments, then compare OP user names, then get back to me with how you feel about me speaking on behalf of another individual with whom i have no connections or insight into how they think.
/r/MensRights13/02/14 11:03 PM
0

figured you had mistook me for the trans woman whose question this was like a few of the other commenter in this thread have. id say it was fair to say i have a troll-esque commenting pattern about me.
/r/MensRights13/02/14 10:50 PM
-1

My trolldar is going off pretty hard reading her posts its a day one account. :(
/r/MensRights13/02/14 10:37 PM
-5

take a look see at the other thread then, be sure to click full comments, i really fucked up the presentation of this post.
/r/MensRights13/02/14 10:32 PM
0

having a terrible credit rating belies irresponsibility/untrustworthy (im english, no medical bankruptcy here), irresponsibility/untrustworthy can very easily be a fundamental part of who somebody is. to juxtapose, if someone has changed their sex and has had it sanctioned by government then wouldnt that new sex assignment be the fundamental part of who you are, rather than the prior gender. thats what sex changes are all about, how they feel that they are fundamentally women and not men or vice…
/r/MensRights13/02/14 10:25 PM
-4

its an incredibly contentious issue. at one point i thought how it equates to not informing partners of an std, but then std are physical and not informing of gender reassignment is nothing but psychological. sure psychological damage can have drastic effects but im a firm believer in self discipline. id equate not telling a potential partner about gender reassignment to not telling prospect partners about having a bad credit rating.
/r/MensRights13/02/14 09:58 PM
-17

thats the question poised to you.
/r/MensRights13/02/14 09:51 PM
0

nope. i wouldnt be satisfied with it if i tried to explain it.
/r/MensRights13/02/14 09:49 PM
7

is prostitute the right word?
/r/MensRights13/02/14 08:59 PM
15

it was a charge of failing to stop, wouldnt it be right to plead not guilty given that it was an accident and if you werent aware that you had just ran over two children playing in the leaves..
/r/MensRights01/02/14 11:35 AM
6

im about to go drink and drive and kill myself by smashing a 747 laden with post and wares into your house. you better damn well do something about it or youre going to get bummed in prison. jerk.
/r/MensRights25/01/14 03:16 PM
7

those passengers on those planes knew it was hijacked. charge them all!
/r/MensRights25/01/14 02:59 PM
-2

tack ?
/r/MensRights25/01/14 12:43 PM
-2

*tact
/r/MensRights25/01/14 12:21 PM
15

you let 9/11 happen, you did nothing to stop it, you should be charged.
/r/MensRights25/01/14 08:16 AM
1

there isnt a court in the land that would impose sentence simply because someone is black. this racial sentencing gap you mention is a result of combining a bunch of criminal cases together for an average when the reality is that each case has its own merits and those merits are what determines the sentence and combining these individual cases makes for a bullshit blurb like racial what-have-yous..
/r/MensRights16/01/14 12:23 PM
0

you can have no less than 1000$ if that bridge is male.
/r/MensRights15/01/14 01:31 PM
-2

i dont think there is a judge in the land who would pass a sentence that was harsher just because of someones gender.
/r/MensRights15/01/14 01:09 PM
-3

i see no problem with people being sentenced in accordance with the law.
/r/MensRights15/01/14 12:42 PM
-12

its not really, judges have a scale and they can place punishment anywhere within that scale, theres always option for appeal and ameica has its plea bargaining.
/r/MensRights15/01/14 01:25 AM
-21

you should see my comments regarding foreskins, they bomb.
/r/MensRights29/11/13 05:30 PM
-43

/r/suicidewatch /r/depression and /r/ForeverAlone sound like a sorry bunch. if you like kissing arse, youll probably enjoy posting in those subs.
/r/MensRights29/11/13 05:08 PM
1

no. i mean 3,987,556 commandments.
/r/MensRights28/10/13 05:25 PM
1

sent from god, written on the underside of cheeseburger wrappers.
/r/MensRights27/10/13 08:16 PM
5

12 commandments still look better, even after all these years.
/r/MensRights27/10/13 07:00 PM
-1

bollocks. one minister for all. same treatment for all. theres only one code of practice and its applied to all those in custody equally.
/r/MensRights25/10/13 10:23 PM
1

you are foolish. you are foolish.
/r/MensRights15/10/13 06:04 PM
1

you are foolish.
/r/MensRights15/10/13 05:39 PM
1

Is that what you do when you can't come up with a snappy comeback?
/r/MensRights15/10/13 04:53 PM
1

I hope that gives you a tiny bit of satisfaction in your otherwise depressing, shallow life.
/r/MensRights15/10/13 11:12 AM
1

I hope that gives you a tiny bit of satisfaction in your otherwise depressing, shallow life.
/r/MensRights15/10/13 11:02 AM
1

vapid, petty cunt you are.
/r/MensRights15/10/13 10:51 AM
1

I's amazing how much of a vapid, petty cunt you are.
/r/MensRights14/10/13 09:16 PM
2

chance is not a privilege.
/r/MensRights14/10/13 04:07 PM
1

i know it, babe.
/r/MensRights14/10/13 11:21 AM
1

I like how you can't let this go. I bet it burns you up knowing you haven't gotten the last word.
/r/MensRights12/10/13 11:34 AM
1

any flash of genitalia in public to unknowing people is a sex offence buddy. youd be wise to learn that.
/r/MensRights12/10/13 03:51 AM
1

Stop responding you fucking retard.
/r/MensRights12/10/13 02:52 AM
1

even though ive written it down for you, you still dont understand my thoughts on the matter. you are foolish.
/r/MensRights11/10/13 11:21 PM
1

thats not true. my heart bleeds when you type unempathetic.
/r/MensRights11/10/13 11:11 PM
1

you most certainly did waste your time expressing your belief that criminals shouldnt face justice and that it is better to be dead than it is to be alive.
/r/MensRights11/10/13 11:01 PM
1

what of it?
/r/MensRights11/10/13 10:28 PM
1

all crimes carry different consequences. rape and indecent exposure share similar consequences in that both are sex offences and both can lead to being signed on to the sex offenders register, both can lead to prison sentences etc but the punishments vary significantly.
/r/MensRights11/10/13 10:12 PM
-1

why would you assume that i agree with your assertion of your opinion of my opinion? thats not what i think and theres no good reason for you to think that is what i think either. youd be foolish for thinking otherwise.
/r/MensRights11/10/13 10:02 PM
0

kind of hard to commence court procedures when youre dead too.
/r/MensRights11/10/13 09:46 PM
-1

the law is justified in being a law, indecent exposure is a fair and just law. i didnt say that the law is unjustified because i believe the law is justified. i didnt say that he should not be convicted because its the decision of the police to prosecute and the decision of judges to convict and pass sentence. streaking is exposing yourself. if you break the law then i believe you should face the repercussions in accordance with the law.
/r/MensRights11/10/13 09:21 PM
0

rape and exposure are in the same category. that category: sexual offences. youre jumping the gun again with the whole 'same severity thing'. you need to stop saying what people are saying because you are not saying what people are saying.
/r/MensRights11/10/13 09:00 PM
-2

thats the judges decision to make. theres always the appeal system if one doesnt like the judges decision too.
/r/MensRights11/10/13 08:44 PM
-1

its a sex offenders register, i think that it is a necessary precaution to take against those who are deviants of normal and acceptable sexual activities, these people are a risk to the community. i would certainly want to know if my neighbour was likely to trespass my land naked so that i may take precautions in mitigating against said activity. the reality of streaking within the legal system is that its no fun.
/r/MensRights11/10/13 08:29 PM
-1

public nudity/indecent exposure is a crime. disorderly conduct is a crime. im not demonizing the male body, im demonizing the behavior of exposing yourself to unwitting persons. this boys act was a crime, and it should rightly be dealt with as a crime by the justice system.
/r/MensRights11/10/13 07:51 PM
-1

You said that a minor viewing another minor naked demands that a crime be committed, regardless of context fantastic. i knew i didnt type what you said i typed. if only you knew too.
/r/MensRights11/10/13 07:31 PM
-1

I'm saying that death as a boy is preferable to a lifetime of being a target for a victimless fucking crime. which equates to 'a mans death is preferable over a mans life'. often it is the case that employers will bin any applications that make mention of criminal records, this is nothing new. people make assumptions, this is also a well know procedure for people to make. you live the life you create and you face the consequences for your actions. the justice system for the most part is pretty d…
/r/MensRights11/10/13 07:19 PM
-1

and who in their right mind would consider someone to be a monster once youve told them that the reason i am a registered sex offender is because when i was 15 i streaked a high school football game with a sock on my cock? 'A lack of freedom and a lifetime of being considered a monster pretty much cancels all [the good things in life] out' is a very naive and adolescent opinion to have on the matter. i wouldnt expect for a reditor on /r/mensrights would be advocating that a mans death is prefera…
/r/MensRights11/10/13 06:59 PM
-2

You said that a minor viewing another minor naked demands that a crime be committed, regardless of context find where i typed that and C+P it below. but, just to humor you; all actions are worthy of being considered for being crimes.
/r/MensRights11/10/13 06:31 PM
-3

it only stands to reason that you do not understand what equate means or you do not know how to apply it, espescially so because i have just told you that i equated nothing. that would make it the case that you equated those things, not i and if you cant see the difference then i would suggest that theres something wrong with you.
/r/MensRights11/10/13 05:47 PM
-5

pros of life: learning, loving, feeling, swimming, cycling, adrenaline, masturbating, sex, love, happiness, achievement, kids of your own, pay cheques, birthdays, christmas, bank holidays, summer time, winter, autumn, spring, pets, friends, family, mystery, battlefield 4, travel, beaches, sea food, football, tatse buds, massages, movies, technology, endeavors, hunting, laughing, crying, satisfaction etc etc.
/r/MensRights11/10/13 05:35 PM
-5

i didnt equate anything, you jumped the gun.
/r/MensRights11/10/13 05:24 PM
-4

if you had a picture of a naked 15 year old on your computer there would be hell to pay. a 15 year old who exposes himself to the public should face the repercussions of breaking the law.
/r/MensRights11/10/13 05:00 PM
-10

tell you what buddy. you make a list of the cons of being a registered sex offender and ill make a list of the pros of being alive and well compare them. i promise that when the truth is told it is better to be a registered sex offender than a dead body.
/r/MensRights11/10/13 04:49 PM
-10

it would have been he who ruined his own life, nobody else. its not like his life would have been ruined anyway; certainly t would be a better life as a registered sex offender than as a corpse in the ground.
/r/MensRights11/10/13 04:20 PM
-37

you break the law you face the punishment, whatever it will be.
/r/MensRights11/10/13 09:51 AM
-44

holding him accountable for his own actions is insanity you say? how else is he supposed to learn? how are law or rules to function of people arent accountable for their actions?
/r/MensRights11/10/13 09:06 AM
-9

there is no disadvantage. theres only one reason for dropping out of college and that reason is because you cant hack it. college isnt high school, college is self learning, not spoon feeding. it isnt sexist to say that women graduating is a grEAT ACCOMPLISHMENT.
/r/MensRights11/10/13 08:44 AM
-61

public nudity is a sex offence. everyone knows not to streak. everyone knows that streakers get caught every time. this kid thought itd be a good thing to streak. this kid thought itd be a good thing to kill himself too. the kid made a lot of bad choices. no responsibility lands at the school here.
/r/MensRights11/10/13 08:34 AM
-4

its pretty popular. MLP does nothing for me, i never liked rug rats and ive never seen sponge bob or adventure time. powerpuff girls is something i can get behind. for me, MLP is always going to be up there in the top tiers of pathetic things to enjoy. thats why i used it in the comment.
/r/MensRights10/10/13 09:26 AM
-8

you wont find those kinds of rights in the universal declaration. you must mean the figurative declaration of human rights - the one where you have the right to sit in your bedroom all year long smoking cigarettes and jerking it to my little pony. i suppose you would advocate the release of wrongly convicted baby killer hat mccullough too.
/r/MensRights10/10/13 09:03 AM
-3

you should take up sea fishing. its calming and itll keep you away from decent, regular folk.
/r/MensRights10/10/13 08:52 AM
-4

its a measure to protect the public and limit opportunities for offending behavior from convicted/suspected sex offenders. you dont believe everyone is a sex offender do you? so it isnt an attack on everyones rights and it is simply measures to protect the public from sex offenders.
/r/MensRights10/10/13 08:41 AM
-4

if the police or the courts see fit to impose such conditions on suspects then so be it, its carried out in the best interest of society so there really is no reason to fret. the uk already has similar legislation in place, proposed changes are only minor extensions in relation.
/r/MensRights10/10/13 07:11 AM
-6

or a lacy pink magoo with cancleese.
/r/MensRights10/10/13 07:00 AM
-9

but of course you are free to defend your god given right to pursue sexual activity that is beyond the realm of law. Ted8367 accidental sex offender white knight because he doesnt know better.
/r/MensRights10/10/13 03:36 AM
-9

this isnt an attack on male rights, its an attack on sex offending behaviours. should also be noted that im not redefining, im defining. you dont understand the article, im trying to help you understand.
/r/MensRights10/10/13 02:51 AM
-8

"Breaching a sexual risk order could lead to a five-year jail sentence." thats part 2. you following me now? *edit: it could also be #1 too. a sexual risk order making a part of bail conditions.
/r/MensRights10/10/13 02:31 AM
-9

"The restrictions - which could be used against a person never convicted - ... " i.e bail conditions for a suspected sex offender.
/r/MensRights10/10/13 01:46 AM
-8

2 things: 1: the article is talking about bail conditions, stronger bail conditions being imposed on those suspected of sex offences. 2: the article is talking about sex offence orders, conditions that convicted sex offenders have to abide by. whats the problem with that?
/r/MensRights10/10/13 12:12 AM
0

i should hope that you get no satisfaction from it and that you accept that what you propose is wrong.
/r/MensRights07/10/13 11:23 PM
-9

you sound like the type of person who would deal out their own personal justice.
/r/MensRights07/10/13 08:35 PM
-4

judges have a sliding scale with their sentencing options, no two crimes are the same. similar crimes having two different sentencing outcomes is not a problem at all. theres a god reason as to why we have minimum and maximum sentences for any given crime and so long as there is punishment then justice is served. bringing up N.korea is just being flippant. *edit their/there
/r/MensRights07/10/13 08:03 PM
-14

wrong answer. youve mistaken feelz justice for real justice. real justice considers the effect sentencing will have on the perpetrators too, mitigating circumstances.
/r/MensRights07/10/13 07:26 PM
-2

no it isnt.
/r/MensRights07/10/13 06:01 PM
-14

not really. justice was/is served. be sure not to confuse real justice with feelz justice.
/r/MensRights07/10/13 05:51 PM
1

everyone in class learns the same thing, fit the mold or fail the subject, thats what schooling is. this 61% statistic, it means nothing.
/r/MensRights23/08/13 02:45 PM
1

gcse doesnt have subjects that are gender biased. im not familiar with any school subject that has gender bias at all.
/r/MensRights23/08/13 02:31 PM
-12

what of it?
/r/MensRights23/08/13 08:15 AM
1

exam results are the end product of how much effort people have put into their own education. why would anyone care what difference there is in statistics?
/r/MensRights23/08/13 08:00 AM
1

common sense might have told you that i was poking fun at your daft application of logic.
/r/MensRights22/08/13 05:50 PM
1

use your common sense.
/r/MensRights22/08/13 05:35 PM
1

a logical person wouldnt be querying why gals dont get circumcised in america.
/r/MensRights22/08/13 04:40 PM
1

its not a group effort, its an individual thing.
/r/MensRights22/08/13 01:47 PM
1

not we, you.
/r/MensRights22/08/13 01:30 PM
1

in a manner that asks why the same thing doesnt happen to gals, heres why: gals aint guys and this is the world we live in with its customs and such. me and heconversed about it before, same shit, different day, nothings changed.
/r/MensRights22/08/13 01:17 PM
1

girls have panty liners, men should have them too. guys have circumcisions, girls should have them too.
/r/MensRights22/08/13 12:21 PM
-1

just a matter of time before you came pandering for circumcision equality i suppose. just because it is something doesnt mean it should be applied to everything.
/r/MensRights22/08/13 06:21 AM
-6

sounds like you need feminism. and a pedicure.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 11:20 PM
-9

foreskins arent worth the effort that you devote to them.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 10:12 PM
-3

im sheathed
/r/MensRights21/08/13 09:25 PM
-8

do you like shitting on peoples religion?
/r/MensRights21/08/13 08:53 PM
-2

pinis
/r/MensRights21/08/13 08:17 PM
-4

call me privileged.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 06:02 PM
-4

yes. im an octopus, i have as many peni as i do tentacles.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 05:36 PM
-19

having a fore skin isnt that great. the article makes out like its super sensitive when its no different in sensitivity from the rest of the skin on your penis.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 04:26 PM
-4

OP, crosspost this to /r/TumblrInAction
/r/MensRights18/08/13 08:28 PM
2

how to prevent picking your nose: dont pick your nose. how to stop ice cream melting: eat it quickly. you are a fool playing a fools game.
/r/MensRights15/08/13 05:07 PM
1

boy >peni ... girl > vagine
/r/MensRights13/08/13 11:54 PM
0

its really stupid of you to apply your 'logic' here. fgm and circumcision are not the same thing. buzz lightyear and woody, both computer animated toys, not the same toys.
/r/MensRights13/08/13 10:58 PM
1

ive already told you why fgm is different from male circumcision and ive already told you why male circumcision is not a problem issue.
/r/MensRights13/08/13 10:44 PM
1

you refuse to accept that female genital mutilation is different from male circumcision despite reality. you are hopeless and a fool.
/r/MensRights13/08/13 10:12 PM
-1

its different because boys have penises and girls have vaginas. here, we are talking about boys penises and how that is or is not a mens rights issue. i believe it isnt. you believe fgm is a mens right issue and that if someone thinks something about circumcision then they must think the same thing about fgm. fgm and circumcision are 2 different things, that makes for two separate opinions. here, in the first world, where i assume you live, fgm is ilegal, circumcision is not and its a widely acc…
/r/MensRights13/08/13 05:04 PM
1

wasnt looking for your reply. you barged in.
/r/MensRights13/08/13 04:52 PM
1

its easy. dont be stupid. re read what i wrote. alas, it seems youll not be able to follow that simple rule set having fallen foul of rule 1.
/r/MensRights13/08/13 11:29 AM
1

i am being consistent and i operate no double standard.
/r/MensRights12/08/13 11:35 PM
1

i dont have to endorse any fgm. i am free to pick whatever stance i choose on fgm. currently, im indifferent. circumcision is not a rights issue. unless youre denying the rights of the religions to practice their religion through circumcision. thats when it becomes a rights issue.
/r/MensRights12/08/13 08:36 PM
1

male circumcision is akin to having an ear lobe removed whilst fgm is more akin to having your bell end removed. when i say culturally accepted i mean my culture, as in 1st world culture.
/r/MensRights12/08/13 08:20 PM
1

i didnt say it was ok because it was a parents decision. it is ok because it is culturally accepted as well as medically accepted. when the World Health Organization cries out against circumcision is when ill think to reconsider my stand. dont see why you keep bringing up FGM when we are talking about male circumcision. keep your focus.
/r/MensRights12/08/13 06:48 PM
1

2 different subjects, similar, but independent. 2 different opinions. easy.
/r/MensRights12/08/13 05:16 PM
1

i can.
/r/MensRights12/08/13 04:10 PM
0

the difference being that male circumcision is a widely accepted cultural and social practice and has been so for several thousand years with no legitimate concern or stigma attached to it. evidenced by many doctors performing the procedure on a daily basis in 2013 the world over.
/r/MensRights12/08/13 01:33 AM
1

nothing. fgm has nothing to do with male circumcision. google it. youll see why.
/r/MensRights11/08/13 11:43 PM
1

whats fgm got to do with male circumcision?
/r/MensRights11/08/13 08:41 PM
0

im not looking for others opinions then you come blithering.
/r/MensRights11/08/13 08:21 PM
1

you arent op.
/r/MensRights11/08/13 03:27 PM
0

whats fgm?
/r/MensRights10/08/13 08:38 PM
-1

how does circumcision result in death, STD and erectile dysfunction? how is it less risky than intricate dental surgery?
/r/MensRights10/08/13 06:21 PM
-1

because you arent considering the wider implications of circumcision and society.
/r/MensRights10/08/13 06:11 PM
-1

and how would that sit with religion? also, why are you ignoring parents decisions regarding optional medical procedures. i assume you dont extend it in kind to aesthetic dentistry work, haircuts and clothing fashion, diets and choice in drugs.
/r/MensRights10/08/13 02:50 PM
-4

its a parents choice.
/r/MensRights10/08/13 02:23 PM
-2

you responded to the wrong comment perhaps?
/r/MensRights10/08/13 02:12 PM
-2

that reads on a few levels of stupid.
/r/MensRights10/08/13 01:43 PM
-3

none of those have any meaningful affect on mens rights.
/r/MensRights10/08/13 01:06 PM
-5

im not looking for others opinions, its yours i want. what do you think are issues worth putting your neck out and calling yourself an mra for?
/r/MensRights10/08/13 06:54 AM
-5

as far as im aware the only mens issue im aware of is child support, divorce proceedings and such. what issues do you think men face?
/r/MensRights10/08/13 06:43 AM
0

eh?
/r/MensRights18/07/13 02:54 AM
3

/r/Bad_Cop_No_Donut
/r/MensRights13/07/13 02:18 AM
1

as for the spending, it goes on breast cancer awareness, smear tests and the like.
/r/MensRights08/06/13 01:01 PM
2

the queen is an absolute failsafe for law and is the last person in the chain for things to reach.
/r/MensRights03/06/13 10:30 PM
1

crosshook says oppression of females is a fucking lie. you know it isnt, i know it isnt. he doesnt. tell him what for bud. i tried.
/r/MensRights29/05/13 06:07 PM
3

being told what you can or cant do is oppression. discrimination based on gender is oppression. theres no denying that women were heavily oppressed. voting, employment. christianity was stunting equal rights from the get go. theres no denying that women were oppressed by institutions and attitudes. these days its just attitudes and perspective.
/r/MensRights29/05/13 03:32 PM
2

most feminists just want the same opportunities afforded to them that are afforded to men. then theres the radicals that piss about with objectifying, patriarchy and having everything the way they want. its easy to tell the differnce between a cake scoffer and a sharer. stay jedi pal.
/r/MensRights29/05/13 03:21 PM
1

its a bullshit article because people should know that women contribute as much in the day to day aspects of life as men did all throughout history. she might as well have written an article telling people that ice cream will melt if you throw it in a fire.
/r/MensRights29/05/13 02:11 PM
1

buddy, im arguing that people dont apply common sense to history. if everybody applied a little common sense to history that article wouldnt have been written. this articles been placed here, in this sub, just to massage egos.
/r/MensRights29/05/13 02:01 PM
-11

we all know that women didnt have the same liberties, rights, responsibilities or the same expectations placed upon them as men did pre ww2. we also know that there are exceptions to the rule. this should be common knowledge. do you seek to eliminate feminist equality movements? i support MR purely to be on equal footing for everything the same way that most WR movements do. this blog piece has nothing to do with mens rights and everything to do with people not applying common sense to periods o…
/r/MensRights29/05/13 12:57 PM
-18

why is this in mens rights? how is the factual justice of equality being abused here? what concern of current social injustice is this writers piece? why is this ghost chasing blog piece being brought to our attention?
/r/MensRights29/05/13 12:29 PM
1

patriarchy: when the illuminati isnt scary enough.
/r/MensRights29/05/13 12:48 AM
1

indeed i did, but that doesnt stop the irish blaming the english for the british not helping the irish feed themselves.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 10:55 PM
-2

they arrest him first, in all likeliness he was probably arrested in the clothes that he would have been described of, so they would have been taken for forensics, the home search will come after, they are looking for similar clothes to the ones the lady described, the weapon and any clues that the suspect perpetrated the crime. remember, this was all a lie, the woman wasnt threatened, raped or assaulted, she was lying.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 04:24 PM
-6

i couldnt tell you how the investigation works for certain, but it kind of looks like this: take suspect into custody, interview suspect. keep hold of suspect until warrant is granted to search home, search home for evidence. evaluate if suspect is serious risk to community then release/remand accordingly. do police investigation stuff. once enough evidence to charge has been found then press charges, otherwise dismiss case. the woman was lying the whole time so she would have lied if she was do…
/r/MensRights20/05/13 03:52 PM
0

blame the english for the british not helping the irish feed themselves.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 11:29 AM
2

its not our fault people are starving.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 09:38 AM
-15

thats how police investigations work and it has nothing to do with mens rights. the same would happen to anyone that fit the profile of a violent crime.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 08:34 AM
-28

since im first i'll interject that the woman did not accuse anyone and the guy was arrested simply because he was in the area and wearing similar clothes to the ones described by the woman. nothing to do with mens rights.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 01:26 AM
2

i reckon on you needing a minimum of 25,000 to subsidize your own living costs (food, rent, utilities etc), youd have to get medical insurance, i dont know how much that would cost over 4 years. then there is childcare costs, over 4 years, that could be as much as 20,000. so, assuming you dont get a part time job, youd need to get 50,000 in grants to be sure that you can keep your head above water. lets forget about the legal fees of fighting for your child, thatll be a few thousand. still, for …
/r/MensRights18/05/13 12:52 PM
3

how much have you got and what cost will the education be? i guess if youve spent a few years studying medicine in america they will grant you right to stay.
/r/MensRights18/05/13 11:54 AM
3

how on earth are you going to afford american university fees?
/r/MensRights18/05/13 11:08 AM
3

wouldnt you have to take the child back to ireland with you. will america allow you to stay because your gf was american and you had a baby together but shes dead now?
/r/MensRights18/05/13 10:57 AM
1

dont you know the worlds full of careless people, m.r has its fair share of the fool hardy too.
/r/MensRights16/05/13 11:56 AM
1

same thing.
/r/MensRights16/05/13 11:49 AM
2

sexual offenses is a subsection of a long and all encompassing discussion on sex you should have when they start to show interest in the birds and the bees.
/r/MensRights15/05/13 02:08 PM
0

a blog. a facebook post. a reaction to an event somewhere in the country. somewhere.
/r/MensRights11/05/13 01:04 AM
4

looks to me like this campaign is a "we'll wear what we choose and be damned on your opinion for it" campaign. nout about assault.
/r/MensRights11/05/13 12:55 AM
-1

ive never truthfully filled out a survey. if i was asked to do a survey on my sexual activities id lie on that too. surveys mean nothing.
/r/MensRights11/05/13 12:53 AM
2

lab coats for all!
/r/MensRights11/05/13 12:48 AM
0

same source for leaflets from like minded individuals a country apart.
/r/MensRights11/05/13 12:47 AM
4

why have you mentioned assault?
/r/MensRights11/05/13 12:45 AM
0

whats this to do with rights abuse or misrepresentation?
/r/MensRights11/05/13 12:40 AM
-6

arent we all agreed yet that statistics mean very little no matter what they are on.
/r/MensRights27/04/13 07:02 PM
1

it wouldnt.
/r/MensRights26/04/13 07:32 AM
1

basically, women are supposed to satisfy men. shariah law is interesting from a study perspective if you ever have the opportunity. its hella anti equality but its interesting never the less.
/r/MensRights26/04/13 07:25 AM
1

they were married under shariah law... her 'contract' would have breached their prior marriage contract...
/r/MensRights25/04/13 05:50 PM
3

absolutely no eye contact, to do so will be punishable by law under current rape stature. do you abide by my terms to have sex with me? please sign on the dotted line...
/r/MensRights25/04/13 05:48 PM
3

the metro is merely entertainment for public transport. it does its job brilliantly.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 05:44 PM
1

id like to think that the common man who is innocent of any crimes hes been accused of would ask 'if you have enough evidence to convict me why are you asking me for a plea bargain? what self respecting cop would have a guilty criminal serve less time than they ought to by law?' followed by: 'fuck you, i have committed no crime'.
/r/MensRights19/04/13 10:15 PM
-1

thats what anybody with common sense and accused of any crime would do. nice 1 captain obvious.
/r/MensRights17/04/13 07:32 PM
1

will the flip side of the law mean that ill get punished as a criminal if i am unable to take my kids for the weekend as per visitation rights?
/r/MensRights16/04/13 10:15 PM
1

why is this is mens rights? shouldnt this be in everyones rights? m+w
/r/MensRights16/04/13 08:29 PM
2

that is a shit procedure on the cops behalf.
/r/MensRights11/04/13 10:04 PM
-1

because i wasnt born into that mindset of an entire religion and consequently its politics i choose not to comment or criticize it. femen is just a harmless rage group. they are only in it for the radical attention, they wont ever achieve anything except hate. wage has nothing to do with class. shit, theres no such thing as class any more, only privilege. and i dont know what the minimum wage is over in that area or what the healthcare system is like.
/r/MensRights05/04/13 11:33 PM
1

ermmm... i have no idea about minimum wage, politics or gender equality in the middle east. islamic dominant social issues or political agendas are something i want to stay well clear of. i was raised with a western frame of mind and because of that middle eastern philosophies will forever be alien to me.
/r/MensRights05/04/13 11:16 PM
1

femens islamic womens rights movement is the wetstern equivalent of burning the quaran.
/r/MensRights05/04/13 11:05 PM
3

those 3 issues you mention arent feminist issues. they are issues that have no gender. are you calling them feminist issues because you believe that womens rights advocates should take more of a stand on these issues?
/r/MensRights05/04/13 11:00 PM
1

ill find a link myself then. thx anyway.
/r/MensRights05/04/13 01:54 AM
1

how about linking me an article to read about the case?
/r/MensRights05/04/13 12:54 AM
1

i dont see any links to any news articles... come along now dears, theres an international audiance and we dont all kn ow what you are talking about.
/r/MensRights04/04/13 10:58 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter