TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Xiseria Archive

View 0 posts and 21 comments by Xiseria on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
8

To be perfectly honest, all we have is the word of a proven violent criminal that he's a non-violent criminal. Seriously, given that we know she's violent, uses racial slurs, is clearly not remotely sane, and a whole host of other issues... why would anyone believe without question that the guy actually WAS a drug dealer? This seems like an individual who wouldn't bother checking and could've just picked the first random person on the street who vaguely matched a description even if there were a…
/r/MensRights21/05/15 02:17 PM
5

Yes and no - words that are built out of previous words to form a coherent meaning are not exactly "made up", so much as restructured from previously existing terms. A word that's made up would have no real former connotation. For example, a lot of innuit words were made up on the spot by the person who realized they needed a word to describe something and didn't have one available. These words aren't carefully decided upon nor structured, it's just random sounds thrown together. As such, the in…
/r/MensRights21/05/15 01:25 PM
2

I don't have much time at the moment to post further, but I think we can all agree that math never lies, and therefore Godzilla + Memento = Epix Win Get.
/r/MensRights30/09/14 09:09 PM
2

And now you're getting into the real problem: it's not that people are sexist (intentionally, at least); it's that most writers suck, especially in movies where it's highly visual. How many action movies do you go to for the plot? I just (finally) got to see Pacific Rim the other day, and I can guarantee you, I didn't go into it expecting a good story. I expected horrible plotholes, a complete lack of understanding of the mechanics behind how the mechs worked, and I expected to see giant robots …
/r/MensRights30/09/14 12:47 PM
2

Films are especially bad for this issue since they're remarkably short. 1.5 to 2 hours isn't a lot of time, all things considered. Compared to a novel, TV show or a video game, it's honestly only about a tenth of the space to work with or less in terms of how much can be devoted to useful character information. As a female character needs a vastly more intricate and thorough backstory to get away with harming them in any way at all, or to bypass the need to harm them through other means, in comp…
/r/MensRights29/09/14 07:16 PM
1

Pretty much, yes. Rather than try to beat them over the head, it's easier to lead by example. Hence... my female characters when I write content trend towards being quite in depth and realistic, including having flaws and having to take accountability for their actions. One of the easier methods I've found is to have them create a problem for themselves, and then have to live with the consequences of such and fix it themselves - in this way no one can say a guy had caused it, or that a guy had t…
/r/MensRights29/09/14 06:44 PM
1

I have to go with ParanoidAgnostic, here. It is a problem, the test just misses what the problem actually is. And it's not because of misandry at all, it's just that people are trying to be nice to women in particular. They're not trying to be assholes to men, they just don't try to give an unfair advantage to men is all. There's not some active campaign to try to beat the shit out of men in media, there just isn't a campaign to stop it, is all. But therein lies the problem - because the "averag…
/r/MensRights29/09/14 03:59 PM
2

I agree with you, honestly. The Bechdel test isn't meant to check the quality at all, it'd be like complaining that your fuel gauge on your car doesn't do anything to describe your speed... because it's not supposed to, you have a different tool sitting right next to that for that task called a speedometer. It's almost like that's why it's called a speedometer. =P Now, to answer a few other people who have replied to you, however... the Bechdel test does actually show a problem, it just isn't th…
/r/MensRights29/09/14 03:47 PM
1

It is, of course, simplified; when you're working with large groups, you have to. Clearly, myself and others on this board, or the bulk of those who will read the article, are unlikely to harbour that same opinion, but we're in the minority. The majority are those who watch the media, the ones who pay for it with admission fees, tickets, popcorn, cable bills, advertisements and so on, and for this group, they do in fact tend to think in this manner. It's not really cynical to make a statement th…
/r/MensRights29/09/14 03:41 PM
1

Already covered under "monstrous" women, or those women who harm other women. So long as a woman looks like a woman and is cruel to only men? She's given a pass as a "real" woman. As soon as she harms another woman, or if she started out not looking like a stereotypical woman, then she's expendable in media. The thing to note, is if at any point during the movie she started out looking like a "real woman", then she retains that aspect even if she turns monstrous (Shrek), or if she changes into a…
/r/MensRights29/09/14 03:24 PM
8

I'm calling Poe's law on this one. It's dumb and conspiratorial... and yet just stupid enough that I could believe it as well given the individuals involved. Quinn's not really a conspiracy; that requires some degree of actual organization. She's a pathological liar, sure, and sure she has lots of friends in the media and has been caught lying over and over since she got into the limelight, and sure this fits within the style of crap she normally pulls, but it's almost too obvious at this point.…
/r/MensRights31/08/14 11:22 AM
1

I would actually disagree; according to the national center for PTSD, Cognitive behavioral therapy is considered to be by far the most effective method of treatment for PTSD and... surprise surprise, works almost exactly like the primary treatment for phobias. Largely because it hinges on the exact same premise - exposing someone to their trigger and restructuring the narrative in a positive way under careful, controlled circumstances is the ideal method of breaking down the fear and trauma asso…
/r/MensRights04/07/14 08:00 PM
1

Yes. =P If the long-winded comments didn't give that away already. XD ImDefender gave me the link to the post on skype after he'd made it, so I figured I may as well drop in for a bit and make some clarification on certain points.
/r/MensRights20/06/14 02:03 PM
1

No, she's not married, but she does in fact have a boyfriend already.
/r/MensRights20/06/14 02:00 PM
1

Alright, I'll accept that you very wel may not have run into this before, so sure, I'll go through and round up the data for a descent presentation. That may take awhile, so I'll toss it out piecemeal a little bit at a time. Now, for some of this, it's easier than others. I agree that women are capable of much more than that, as you stated in your initial paragraph. I also realize, however, that just because people are capable of something, doesn't mean they actually perform such. You can't make…
/r/MensRights19/06/14 11:26 PM
4

Toughbeans. I honestly don't care if you're offended. That's your problem to deal with. I'm not calling women and feminists nazis in the sense of "oh they do horrible things!"; I'm saying they're the average, normal individual, the rank and file officer, the average german on the street who let it happen and didn't realize just how bad things were getting. There's a distinctive difference here - I'm not saying they're evil, I'm saying they fell hook, line and sinker for the propaganda machine of…
/r/MensRights19/06/14 05:57 PM
2

Psst, I'm a woman. I have completely equal legal rights under the law. In fact, legally speaking, I have more rights than any man does. I have the right to a fair trial, the right to be handed a job I didn't earn due to affirmative action, and the right to harass or assault a guy on a whim. They can't claim those rights legally, but I can. Here's the thing: feminism doesn't support equality. It supports "equal outcome" not "equal opportunity". There's a massive difference there. I happen to be w…
/r/MensRights19/06/14 05:03 PM
2

This wasn't in relation to my comment, but you get an answer anyway. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fOCD_T9Qqpc Here's a handy example of Feminists attempting to attack a cathedral, and being defended against by pacifistic men while they're spit on, urinated on, and physically harassed non-stop. Lovely demonstration. I could go get a half dozen more of such examples, but if you're just going to discount all of them, why bother? As for a great many feminists, I disagree. To steal a quote from my…
/r/MensRights19/06/14 04:52 PM
1

I want to upvote that... but I can't bring myself to blame Billy Van. Even if he plays everyone on earth so it probably is true.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 06:18 AM
3

Feminism - the radical notion that women are human and men aren't. Oh, and that women are actually only children. Because I like playing in the ball pool! WHEE! ... Sorry, the one thing I want is to earn respect, and that's the one thing feminism provides the exact opposite. With friends like feminism, I don't need enemies. This is why I'm an egalitarian, not a feminist. Because I believe in equality.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 01:57 AM
7

The ones in power, who make the laws, who teach the students, who hold the rallies, who are in charge of the movement lie and cheat, and harm both women and men. For all intents and purposes, the only ones who matter, who actually DO anything, are bigoted assholes. The ones who sit at home and do nothing are mostly not like that, except they prop up the bigots at every opportunity and provide the fanatic zealots credibility. Seriously, you're essentially supporting the Nazis. I know, I know, God…
/r/MensRights19/06/14 01:48 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter