TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Xodima Archive

View 0 posts and 39 comments by Xodima on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Contrarily, feminism is gaining in notice and traction. When your reactionary movements are found out to be shit, feminist victory will increase popularity.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/14 04:22 PM
1

Social conservatives have tried since the 1800s. Movements and even religions greater than you'll ever be have tried and failed. You can only slow progress, not end it.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/14 04:07 PM
1

Actually, you care a lot. Its why this antifeminist harassment campaign that spreads lies, threats, and misinformation came about. Your attempts at silencing us is what we have to worry about. we're not actively silencing your demographic.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/14 03:55 PM
-6

Mind blown. The thing is, your time is wasted on Redditors and blogger feminists such as myself. You should bring stuff like this to the big feminists. Schedule a live debate and represent the MRM. You just need to be brave and know that feminists have no logical arguments to be completely honest. (I am one, I know!). you'll definitely win over the most sane and rational people.
/r/MensRights20/09/14 07:12 PM
2

Except the exact opposite. Hans Olav Syversen of the right wing KrF (Christian conservative) was against it and denounced the obligation. It was overwhelmingly supported by the Labor party, which is the vast majority of feminists and Left wing crowd.
/r/MensRights07/08/14 08:06 PM
0

I gave all the proof available. It's as explicit a denial as it gets. you haven't quoted her saying anything pro-feminist yet. You only assert her allegiance among mountains of evidence to the contrary, though I would love it if you'd stop going around the question and state proof that she was a feminist. I see none, and you say she's a feminist despite her not saying so. It seems to me that you have no such quote and you're lying out your ass. It's simple, just show her saying that she's a femi…
/r/MensRights16/07/14 01:50 PM
0

You have no evidence. You can simply answer my quetion since you made the claim that she was a feminist. You have to prove that she was, which is only provable by stating it in any way shape or form which you have not shown. you lied. I made the claim that she does explicitly state that. It might not be verbatim but she clearly denounces it. If she is against the basic tenet of feminism as it has began, she is against feminism. there is no way around it.
/r/MensRights16/07/14 12:55 PM
0

I stated my evidence, where is yours? In her Letter to Queen Victoria on Lord Chancellor Cranworth’s Marriage and Divorce Bill, Caroline Norton assured her majesty that she had ‘never pretended to the wild and ridiculous doctrine of equality.’ It is true Caroline was a good friend of Mary Shelley but Mary Wollstonecraft’s feminist views as expressed in A Vindication of the Rights of Woman had not reached her. Edit: More Edit 2: Dailymail
/r/MensRights16/07/14 12:35 PM
0

Okay, simple challenge: Quote Caroline Norton saying that she is a feminist, or that what she is doing is feminist works. NOBODY but Caroline Norton. Please. I'll shut up about the whole deal.
/r/MensRights16/07/14 12:23 PM
0

"Caroline Elizabeth Sarah Norton was an English feminist, social reformer, and author". Said somebody that is not her. try again. Everything I said was truth and you're trying to drown out opposition with arrogance. You are lying and you know it. anyone can look into these sources. She explicitly denied involvement with feminists at the time. I am not bolding her quote for you as I know you've read it. Could you perhaps provide one scrap of evidence to back up your claim Caroline Norton wasn't a…
/r/MensRights16/07/14 10:39 AM
0

You mean where you declared Caroline Norton to not be a Feminist, despite your own source stating so (as well as mine) because of a passage in a random source that stated she didn't join one particular Feminist organization at the time? The source considered her a feminist by action, but there is no evidence of her being a feminist. Only evidence of the contrary. A deliberate lie by you because you read it in full and also clearly read the last paragraphs. Where you quoted a vague reference and …
/r/MensRights16/07/14 09:49 AM
0

I strongly suggest it too. I am proud of my comments and I am sure people will eventually run into something that surprises them.
/r/MensRights16/07/14 08:46 AM
0

Yep! Spot on. I like this guy a lot ;) He really proved that you were trying to paint anyone as a feminist regardless of their denouncement of its values and lack of affirmation. He did make an error though. He said "Correct" as if affirming your whole point that she was a feminist. It looks like he didn't read it well and didn't notice that you said she wasn't not a feminist or he would have specified.
/r/MensRights16/07/14 08:00 AM
-2

As a feminist, I have no idea. I don't hate people enough to care about something that's speculated to happen in five million years. As a matter of fact, I love how we find more about genetics and get closer to curing gender-specific diseases, but this thread is full of people who only give a shit about retaining malehood in years that humans may be extinct. Edit: (Even though that's impossible since a male sex is required for reproduction by normal methods an thus can't "Evolve" to eliminate it…
/r/MensRights24/04/14 01:57 PM
1

If one person's desire to have sex overrides their apprehension to go forward because the message was unclear, the yes, areas become gray. However, I already mentioned how to make it black and white. You ask or wait, and if there isn't a clear answer, you don't go forward. The worst thing that can happen is interrupting the moment and not having sex. Nobody should be treating a specific sexual encounter like a necessity or an uncontrollable urge.
/r/MensRights24/03/14 06:07 AM
1

Nope. It's pretty black and white. If either the verbal or physical language implies a "No" then you have all rights to stop and ask (BDSM situation was well described by /u/FallingSnowAngel ). If you are unsure, ask. All gray areas can be sent one way or the other by direct communication. There is no reason that you need to settle for anything less than being absolute certain that this is consensual. Worst case scenario is not having sex with that person or at that time. No loss at all other th…
/r/MensRights23/03/14 09:06 PM
2

Read We’re only recognizing women who have excelled at what are generally thought to be “masculine” pursuits. And lost interest. Breaking fake barriers is big news. There's no reason to celebrate conformity to tradition. Pursuits in science, engineering, exploration, technology, and might to defend oneself are invariably important. These aren't masculine pursuts at all and don't need to be considered one. These are IMPORTANT and necessary and as such, don't need a masculine label. This is androc…
/r/MensRights23/03/14 03:23 PM
1

Okay, I think I can better empathize with that particular view of feminism. Thanks for going in depth with it. I actually do now understand a bit of what I didn't before, mainly, the idea that supplanting "Feminism" with "Men's rights" is anything more than a hateful agenda to change the general affections of popular opinion rather than add to the table, a movement which would balance the affections (coinciding rather than abolition) My biggest issue with Men's Rights is the "Kill you, change th…
/r/MensRights22/03/14 12:54 PM
1

Really? You think nobody would point out that "millionaire avoids justice" is not exactly novel and everyone would ignore that and just call it sexism? Absolutely. In this sub, it's not about money, it's about women behaving badly and getting away with it (Damn those evil disgusting women!) Nothing in the article you linked says that women are considered more attractive than men and that this is the reason for the sentencing gap, so I'm not sure where you're getting that from. Women have more ne…
/r/MensRights22/03/14 02:28 AM
0

If the case in the OP was "rich millionaire woman gets short sentence" nobody would be treating it as sexism. I call BS to be honest. Nobody would care. They'd just chalk it up to being a woman as always. Nobody here would say "Not really, she's rich so it's nothing to do with her being female." It's true, http://www.news.cornell.edu/stories/2010/05/unattractive-people-pay-price-court Neotenic features regardless of sex give you more jail time, but females often have said features. The only way …
/r/MensRights21/03/14 06:31 PM
0

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2014/03/18/dupont-heir-accused-of-raping-second-child/6568787/ Not like a man can rape his three year old daughter for nearly a decade and get no time in prison.
/r/MensRights21/03/14 05:43 PM
2

There may not be much of a movement left, but what remains clearly has disproportionate influence on politics and bureaucracy. I'm neutral on this. I don't doubt you but what I see often pointed out as feminist legislation, at least in the US, is often based in liberalism (idea of equality = push which is sometimes positive, sometimes negative. Race and gender combined.) and traditionalism (Opposite of feminism) or things that are dying out in popularity from years ago (Which I agree should be a…
/r/MensRights21/03/14 03:09 PM
1

Sorry I haven't gotten back to you. I have been a bit drained and writing walls of text doesn't agree with my level of motivation. hah xD Not ignoring though, just not up to the task at the moment. :< Still, I want to thank you again for taking the time to reply. I will get motivated at some point.
/r/MensRights17/03/14 04:51 PM
1

Can you actually source this so it doesn't look like you or someone else wrote this in word and posted it to your/their own Tumblr to form a link?
/r/MensRights16/03/14 04:39 PM
2

I simply think that the "official" feminist movement (i.e. radical second wave and third wave feminism, speaking ideologically) is not the right one to do so. That's reasonable. However, I don't think there's much of an official movement left. Feminism as I know it, is ideologically conflicted. I might just be unaware of the mainstream since I mostly follow certain bloggers and Redditors as well as a few friends, but I think criticism of it is fine and necessary. partly because it has a flawed a…
/r/MensRights15/03/14 06:18 PM
2

Ahh, yeah! It's great to discuss this and I couldn't help but reply. I think we have a very similar take on this from different perspectives. Remember the standard issue Subject-Object dichotomy... Men Do, Women Are. This is ultimately because a man's social contributions are found solely in his actions, and a woman's are seen as products of her biology. That is sadly pretty prevalent standard in society. And I agree that being female gives someone a bit of glass on both ends of the spectrum. I …
/r/MensRights14/03/14 06:14 PM
2

See, my problem with that assertion though, is that value itself has multiple determining factors. My understanding is that women are seen as more weak and fragile, incapable and in need of protection, where as men are seen as plenty capable to defend himself. This doesn't make women very valuable, just a life in debt to the bigger man. However, men are definitely seen, traditionally, as more capable, more useful and Better which IS a contributing factor in value. This means that a family has mo…
/r/MensRights14/03/14 02:50 PM
1

You do know that it wouldn't be an all-female army. In fact, it would just be a larger army using both men and women who are capable fighters vs an army half the size where women pose absolutely no threat in this hypothetical situation. Also, I'd find society much more prepared and advanced if we, throughout history, acknowledged that the entire population had a brain. I would bet all of my money and them some against you because I know I would win.
/r/MensRights04/03/14 11:43 AM
0

This is bullshit and it's literally saying that women are inherently only good for breeding until something better comes along since women are holding us back with their inefficient wombs which make us keep them alive. If anything, it's an argument for feminism so that women can prove their significance in a society where their "Traditional role" is being erased and effectively making women optional "Women select the best men and reward them with sex and children." How the hell does that make se…
/r/MensRights04/03/14 09:34 AM
5

Yeah, considering that /u/Celda and MANY other MRAs actively posts uncensored vitriol in /r/Feminism and /r/AskFeminists, it's very odd that someone would be banned for simple dissidence. I smell dishonesty.
/r/MensRights02/02/14 02:43 PM
1

Old? Yes... but absolute lie? I think you're hiding something :I
/r/MensRights10/10/13 02:15 AM
5

Being a feminist myself, I will ignore the strawman. heh Regardless, I wish this comment was upvoted a bit more. The mammogram was unnecessary and even given that bit of information, the claim is being represented poorly by the top comments ignoring that this was not policy for funding. The clinic receives grant money from Susan G. Komen for screenings for uninsured patients, regardless of gender.
/r/MensRights10/10/13 01:34 AM
1

I guess it's a Canadian/regional thing rather than an age thing then.
/r/MensRights03/10/13 04:10 PM
5

I'm a 26 year old male and I have never in my life heard "check your privilege" Being in Job Corps for two years, Full Sail UNiversity for another two, and working in customer service, I have seen many demographics and NEVER once seen anyone ask anyone to check their privilege.
/r/MensRights03/10/13 03:36 PM
1

And thanks to feminism's influence, society cares little for men, except when it needs a scapegoat. That's a pretty generic statement. You must be really upset to be putting words in my mouth. Try some breathing exercises. I never mentioned that you said that. I simply said that you are "Taking it like that" as in seeing research as definitive of good vs bad such as when you supplied the example: ' "Eggs are healthy!" "Eggs are unhealthy!" "Eggs are healthy!" "Eggs are unhealthy!". After a while…
/r/MensRights30/08/13 04:57 PM
0

Well, your obvious antagonistic attitude aside, the original post was an attack on her, and the general idea was that she's batshit crazy and it was to prove that all feminists are crazy. The video of the actual interview, (which I guess the original poster didn't want us to see because that's how twisting the truth works...I mean, really. If you SAW the interview, why not link it unless you don't want anyone to actually see it?), disproved that.
/r/MensRights30/08/13 03:26 PM
0

How did you know this person's age? Also, if you base your opinions on research, you're already taking it the wrong way. Sorry, there is no clear cut answer to life's problems. Research IS being done on women and the growing Histrionic Personality Disorder. Extensive research is being done wherever money takes it. There is no huge governing monolith that controls the direction of it. People care enough about something to pay for the research and it's done. There's plenty of positive outcomes for…
/r/MensRights30/08/13 03:16 PM
-5

You can't talk positive of gender equality in a group of countries where feminism is strong. That's bad for MRA. Feminism is inherently evil and every country where feminism is strong means men always suffer greatly and women gain everything.
/r/MensRights30/08/13 10:12 AM
2

To be honest, this interview wasn't bad. She DID NOT blame men for being inherently rapist. She DID NOT say that most men were rapists or even wanted to rape. She DID NOT blame men for being rapists. She basically pressed the matter as something based on social stigma that goes even into childhood. You can't possibly say that being called girly as a boy was a compliment. She did give social justice movements MUCH more credit than they deserve, however. As far as the comment on military bases goe…
/r/MensRights30/08/13 10:02 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter