TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Xyyz Archive

View 0 posts and 23 comments by Xyyz on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

The article reads completely neutral to me.
/r/MensRights05/02/23 02:16 PM
1

How are you so confident the anxiety is entirely fake? That said, even assuming it's real, cutting off contact entirely doesn't seem like a good solution. For all you know, they might even just hate being left alone with her.
/r/MensRights10/09/22 11:43 PM
1

Yeah, what a crazily whiny post. Some inoffensive cutesy story and it's straight to "I suspect a man would be arrested for this", which they probably wouldn't even be.
/r/MensRights10/09/22 11:38 PM
1

I don't think the queen of the United Kingdom having been a woman is particularly relevant to women as a whole. But I don't think most CEOs being male is particularly relevant to men either. Men and women aren't teams.
/r/MensRights10/09/22 11:31 PM
1

I don't know what "gendered violence" is supposed to be, but the article is about domestic violence. The statement appears to be about violence in general. I don't know what the context was in the article but it seems likely that it was out of place.
/r/MensRights09/09/22 05:18 PM
1

I thought you were talking about violence in general as that's what the wiki article is about. The wiki article's title is "Domestic violence".
/r/MensRights09/09/22 05:16 PM
1

It's an article about domestic violence. Why should there be a random sentence about violence in general?
/r/MensRights09/09/22 05:15 PM
2

It is unhealthy and counterproductive to have an "us versus them" mindset. There is a pattern of indifference towards men's suffering, but an indication of women's suffering increasing is not something to smirk about.
/r/MensRights09/09/22 05:07 PM
1

This is only true if talking about relative rates. If some article claims that the rate of female suicide goes up when it's only the ratio of women to men going up, they are outright wrong or lying. But I have a hard time believing that you've actually seen this, because male suicide rate would have to drop faster than female suicide rate for this to come up.
/r/MensRights09/09/22 05:02 PM
1

It shouldn't bother you that this is a headline. As a trend, it is both interesting and alarming. I agree that there is a pattern of indifference towards men's suffering, but it is not demonstrated by the existence of this headline. To behave as if it were makes you come across like you are looking for things to complain about. Men's rights advocates face a lot of scrutiny, and it matters how you come across.
/r/MensRights09/09/22 04:57 PM
1

They had things to say, sure, they were just on easier and more internationally relevant issues.
/r/MensRights26/06/22 03:56 AM
2

Who said "travel and lodging"? It's not clear how large this reimbursement is.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 02:14 AM
1

accompanying your SO to have one is nice, but not really necessary. Not everyone can drive or take public transit to a clinic.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 01:59 AM
2

This is fundamentally not a question for science.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 01:56 AM
-8

Don't celebrate more equal injustice.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 01:52 AM
-1

Don't base your political views on which protest signs annoy you.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 01:51 AM
-1

Well, where were you when Ukrainian men (and only men) can't leave the country in war. Outside of Ukraine, presumably. Are you surprised people care more about the issues in their own country? How often do you hear protests about abortion laws in some far-away country?
/r/MensRights25/06/22 01:46 AM
-4

The argument is that you cannot be compelled to save someone else's life if it violates bodily autonomy. You can't be compelled to donate organs or blood, so the argument is that a woman can't be compelled to use her womb to sustain the child. The kid on your back will survive without your back.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 01:43 AM
-5

Both actions are intended to prevent babies. But I don't think it is common for abortion to be a first resort. Although even if it were, I am sure it still beats those same people getting a baby.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 01:40 AM
1

I appreciate the utility, and the usage doesn't bother me. But the fact remains that there is a culturally significant group of people that use it in an odd way and are unpleasant. That affects the perception of the word. And that is why people get upset.
/r/MensRights10/04/22 05:23 PM
0

It is unusual to use "female" as a noun when "women" will do. There is a tendency for people who do it in spite of that, whatever the reasons or causes, to be unpleasant. There are some contexts where, even referring to female humans, a good case can be made for "female" as a noun. In some contexts, it is even the norm. But this whole situation has become an issue on people's minds, and people are not so good with nuance.
/r/MensRights10/04/22 03:36 PM
1

The trick is you have to find an argument that doesn't work equally well in favour of all murder.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/05/20 10:43 PM
3

Maybe less of a fantasy though.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/05/18 05:03 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter