TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

YHWH_The_Lord Archive

View 0 posts and 221 comments by YHWH_The_Lord on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Have you had to resist the primal urge to punch random strangers? On a daily basis. Comes with my job.
/r/MensRights07/01/15 04:45 PM
0

HAH. No.
/r/MensRights29/04/14 08:29 PM
2

Yahoo news isn't exactly professional news anymore.
/r/MensRights26/04/14 11:42 PM
2

I was merely explaining how ageism lawsuits work. I don't really give a fuck about Wil Wheaton.
/r/MensRights22/01/14 09:31 PM
1

Granted, I wouldn't give anyone in their early twenties a managerial position anywhere except McDonald's, but still... But you would be able to deny them for other reasons. Like lack of job experience.
/r/MensRights21/01/14 10:01 PM
9

You would think a lawyer would have been able to make him an ageism lawsuit or something. You can only do that if a company treats you unfairly due to being old. If it happens because you're young tough shit.
/r/MensRights21/01/14 11:06 AM
2

You lost me at "dawkinists". Just leave.
/r/MensRights18/12/13 09:17 PM
2

I believe that in the event that someone intentionally lies to their partner in order to get pregnant without their knowledge they should be ruled an unfit parent and the child should be removed from their care.
/r/MensRights04/12/13 12:04 AM
3

Nice try NYPD PR department.
/r/MensRights19/10/13 04:29 PM
0

very short This is a reoccurring problem for me. I feel like i could be a lazy fat fuck and still get looks if i were 6'+. Women like you are the bane of my existence.
/r/MensRights13/08/13 08:29 PM
1

And being in the UFC doesn't mean you're a top fighter. Yeah, it kinda does. UFC is invite only. You can't just join up, you get hand-picked. If you're in the UFC, you're among the top fighters in the world. Period.
/r/MensRights13/08/13 08:25 PM
18

Consuming more than you expend is the ONLY way to get fat. There are a few relatively rare conditions that make it much harder for you to expend what you consume, but they do not apply to the majority of fat people. Most people are fat because they eat too much and don't exercise enough.
/r/MensRights13/08/13 08:22 PM
1

Looked up HAES. This goes directly against what is actually healthy. The fact that they use "Pleasure based" repeatedly is enough evidence for me to sweep this movement aside as fat people trying to feel good about being fat rather than doing something about it.
/r/MensRights13/08/13 08:12 PM
1

Oh yes i love rape.
/r/MensRights09/08/13 04:47 PM
0

I've grabbed many asses. Only one person has ever reacted badly. You want to know how she handled it? She smacked my wrist and said "not cool". So, i engaged her in conversation and ended up dating her. How have i achieved this? By not being a dumbass about time/location/who I'm doing it to. Something makes me doubt I'll run into problems.
/r/MensRights09/08/13 12:35 AM
-1

I fully do have the right to make anyone i want uncomfortable. And other people have the right to attempt to make me uncomfortable. You're just drawing the line at touching. I draw the line at violence. You can't live your life without leaving your comfort zone every now and again.
/r/MensRights08/08/13 08:46 PM
-2

If i don't want to be punched, and you punch me, i'm going to punch you back, and it's going to be your fault. The difference between a punch and an ass grab is a punch has the potential to injure/kill, while an ass grab has the potential to make you a little bit uncomfortable. See the difference? As a straight male, I've had my ass grabbed by women and gay men. The worst thing that's ever happened was an awkward 5 minutes with a guy in an elevator who thought i was gay.
/r/MensRights08/08/13 07:59 PM
-6

Well, sounds like a personal problem.
/r/MensRights08/08/13 07:53 PM
-6

WHY is it not ok? It's just an ass grab. Why are people so afraid of anything that can even be construed as sexual?
/r/MensRights08/08/13 07:47 PM
2

Part of it is many lesbians are of the belief that almost all females are bisexual with alcohol involved. They're wrong, in my experience.
/r/MensRights08/08/13 04:07 PM
2

This is why you use it as an opportunity to reciprocate. Why does ass grabbing have to be a bad thing?
/r/MensRights08/08/13 04:04 PM
0

There's no way to respectfully objectify. That's my fucking point.
/r/MensRights22/07/13 01:37 AM
2

Party on the beach. Figured what the hell. I knew all of the people who paid for everything and paid for part of the party myself. If she started shit she'd have been the one leaving.
/r/MensRights21/07/13 09:58 PM
3

I don't care. This was on the beach at a party. Situation matters. I wouldn't respond that way in the workplace, or in many public places. I would however find out what the meaning of the ass grab was by trying to initiate conversation afterwards though.
/r/MensRights21/07/13 09:54 PM
2

So if a woman told you "all i want from you is your dick, you're useless to me otherwise" you wouldn't be upset? "Nice ass." Isn't objectification. It's a fucking compliment.
/r/MensRights21/07/13 07:40 PM
5

Assuming you're judging him based on "Similarly, if you don't think someone has a particularly interesting personality and have no interest in their hobbies, but you find them sexually attractive, it's not immoral for you to interact with them solely because you want to have sex with them." What exactly is wrong with casual sex? Because that's EXACTLY what he described.
/r/MensRights21/07/13 07:37 PM
3

So you're saying the objectification of women is only a problem when it comes to levels of not considering women people. Which everyone already agrees with. So this conversation is pointless.
/r/MensRights21/07/13 07:36 PM
4

While in line for another bar that my friends dad owns So... why were you waiting in line?
/r/MensRights21/07/13 07:18 PM
27

To be honest, had the men not gone off to war, feminism probably would have failed miserably.
/r/MensRights21/07/13 07:16 PM
3

Yeah the ass grab is either "hey come talk to me" or just someone fucking around with stranger's heads. Either way the ass grab seemed like the appropriate response to an ass grab.
/r/MensRights21/07/13 07:12 PM
13

To be fair, the last bit happened to me a few months ago. My response was to wait till they were walking by again and grab HER ass. We then talked, exchanged numbers, fucked, and i never called her.
/r/MensRights21/07/13 06:15 PM
6

College is supposed to be for educating the morons so that they're no longer morons. The problem isn't colleges letting too many people in, it's colleges caring more about money than the academic success of young people.
/r/MensRights04/07/13 01:12 AM
0

His waistline is pretty fucking tiny compared to what it should be with that much muscle. Hourglass shape is NOT natural for men. He should look more like this: http://www.ironmind.com/ironmind/export/sites/default/ironmind/mariuszfw_th.jpg Notice his waist doesn't shrink compared to upper body? That's the #1 way to tell the difference between true strength and aesthetic muscle. Mix in thin wrists and ankles. You quite simply can't build muscles that size and not have any strength in them. Good …
/r/MensRights27/06/13 10:56 PM
1

Thin wrists/small forearms are a good sign. Along with a thin waistline and small legs compared to upper body. These are all signs of weakness yet somehow considered a superior look for bodybuilding.
/r/MensRights27/06/13 06:54 AM
3

People who strength train for deadlift/bench/squat are powerlifters, not bodybuilders, powerlifters train for strength bodybuilders for looks. Bodybuilding has ALWAYS been about looks as a sport. It just not used to be possible to get the muscle mass to compete without serious lifting. Now we have drugs and injections for that so the vast majority of bodybuilders are weaklings. Powerlifters have always and will always be strong as fuck because the sport is literally "how much can you lift?". Bod…
/r/MensRights27/06/13 12:54 AM
2

I'm 5'4" 165 male. I Out-lift female bodybuilders. Female bodybuilders use hormones and steroids. I know several of them. They're about as strong as your average large man who never goes to the gym. Male bodybuilders are weaker than they look as well though. This is mostly due to the fact that bodybuilders are not in fact very strong at all. They rely on drugs, hormones, and injections.
/r/MensRights26/06/13 11:06 PM
3

There are two women in my IT department and 4 men. 3 of the men are idiots the other one is me. One of the women is an idiot who i can only imagine got hired because she's a 9 with huge tits. The other one complains about exactly what you speak of almost every day. So, even when i DO know what they need, I defer to her just to see the look on the customer's face.
/r/MensRights25/06/13 03:14 PM
5

Someone doesn't live in Florida.
/r/MensRights10/06/13 03:28 AM
1

Not only should she be following her own advice, but did anyone else notice her advocating PUA's/seduction?
/r/MensRights28/05/13 09:50 PM
0

They're pretty much the same in this situation. Jokingly calling someone a pedophile is still calling someone a pedophile and that's not a laughing matter, period.
/r/MensRights25/05/13 06:17 PM
64

40 years ago it would have been called "justified". Accusing someone of being a pedophile is much much more than "saying mean words". It's accusing someone of one of the most heinous acts imaginable and a mere accusation can be life-ruining.
/r/MensRights24/05/13 11:26 PM
3

You sound like my 12 year old sister.
/r/MensRights22/05/13 07:17 PM
3

'Manhood' is the period that begins when puberty ends. I just defined it for all of you. Stop arguing bullshit.
/r/MensRights22/05/13 07:14 PM
8

Most of the time these things are how you judge whether you are even going to interview them. When you have 100+ applicants to go through you can be as picky as you want.
/r/MensRights22/05/13 06:44 PM
3

Not a fucking clue. IANAL. Just have spent a decent amount of time reviewing wiretapping laws and case law.
/r/MensRights15/04/13 04:31 PM
3

If you can set a sound recorder down on your table inside your apartment and hear them, there's nothing illegal about it. If you drill a hole in the wall or stick it under their door, it's a felony.
/r/MensRights15/04/13 03:31 PM
2

Their subjects were drawn from known crime victims and battered women. So, this isn't representative of the general public. This study shouldn't be on the front page at all tbh.
/r/MensRights07/04/13 04:22 PM
3

And 70%+ of women. To be completely honest, i don't think the men's number would be nearly as high if the women's number dropped. People are much more likely to become violent when someone else is being violent towards them.
/r/MensRights07/04/13 04:06 PM
2

Graham-Kevan & Archer also stressed that their and Johnson's research sampling methods should be regarded as preliminary: their subjects were relatively few in number and were drawn from known crime victims or battered women, and thus may not be representative of randomized general population samples. Moreover, Graham-Kevan & Archer argued that, by relying entirely on analysis of data from one partner in an abusive relationship, Johnson's study was incomplete and skewed due to reporting bias.
/r/MensRights07/04/13 04:05 PM
4

So simply leaving the relationship, you feel is the best option? Rather than you know, discussing problems with the relationship. Guess what, it's a two way street, if this makes the woman feel uncomfortable, she's just as free to leave the relationship as he is. If she's so emotionally unstable that she can't handle that, maybe she shouldn't be dating in the first place? Also, Intimidation (also called cowing) is intentional behavior that "would cause a person of ordinary sensibilities" fear of…
/r/MensRights11/03/13 10:07 PM
2

Because with most normal people in a significant relationship, sex is expected. Unless otherwise talked about at the beginning of the relationship no sex is a perfectly ok reason to leave somebody. Explaining this fact to someone before doing it isn't a threat, it's a warning. Coercion requires a threat or mental manipulation.
/r/MensRights11/03/13 09:48 PM
9

"If you won't have sex with me I'm breaking up with you." Is not, has not ever been, and will never be coercion.
/r/MensRights11/03/13 06:12 PM
4

No. Consenting to do something is consent. If someone holds a gun up to your head and forces you to do it, that's coercion. Psychological coercion is hard to prove.
/r/MensRights11/03/13 06:11 PM
6

"Women can't drive" and "get back in the kitchen!" jokes aren't nearly as harmful as "all men are rapists".
/r/MensRights05/03/13 11:09 PM
5

Except it didn't happen and she should have to pay the money back.
/r/MensRights24/02/13 05:07 PM
10

Ever been inside of a "Gender studies" class? It's basically this.
/r/MensRights20/02/13 06:24 PM
1

Actually he was just saying that it has nothing to do with men's right's and everything to do with... not being a pussy.
/r/MensRights19/01/13 06:58 PM
0

Women have a habit of freaking out over things many guys would think they'd be fine with.
/r/MensRights19/01/13 06:57 PM
5

More like lawsuit. Seriously. They need to be shut down.
/r/MensRights11/01/13 03:22 PM
2

So in other words he should name all of them in his lawsuit too.
/r/MensRights06/01/13 05:21 PM
8

I never specified strength. Strength isn't the only thing testosterone helps with. Helps with toning muscle as well as with building it. Men's muscles are not only stronger but faster and more enduring. Meaning not only are we capable of picking up heavier things, say we needed to move 50 of that heavy thing to the same spot, it's not so heavy that women couldn't pick it up, but it could still be assumed that the man would get the job done faster due to him being able to take less breaks and mov…
/r/MensRights06/01/13 04:49 PM
15

Depends on the field. Men are more productive than women in all forms of hard labor. We've got testosterone to thank for that. When it comes to paperwork it's much more person-to-person.
/r/MensRights06/01/13 04:29 PM
2

Arm extended fully, no. Put my arm around him and carry him? No problem.
/r/MensRights19/12/12 12:56 AM
2

I'm 5'5" and 145 pounds and i can say i could definitely one-arm that kid. He weighs 90-110. At most. The girl he's next to looks to be about 125-135. With a HUGE reach advantage. If he's winning against girls that size it's because he's WAY faster than they are. Put him in a league of boys that are that size and he'd be dominated.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 06:53 PM
15

Considering this has happened before, no he's not. He's delusional only if he thinks it's statistically likely to happen to him specifically. Same with the parents who won't let their children go outside on their own because "they might get kidnapped!".
/r/MensRights13/12/12 08:01 PM
7

I usually just get outright banned.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 07:56 PM
3

Which is not the definition of malicious intent. Malicious intent would be more like she did it specifically BECAUSE she wants to torment you.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 06:09 PM
4

It's not malicious intent on her part most of the time. It starts as a great way to get out of having to deal with the repercussions of fucking someone they didn't intend to. Then it turns into not wanting to get caught in a lie.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 12:59 AM
15

Mostly? Sounds like a complete failure.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 11:25 PM
5

It's a bullshit charge that doesn't stick, but cops can literally arrest someone for anything they want. Cops aren't the ones that can charge you with a crime, that's the court system's job.
/r/MensRights21/11/12 03:34 PM
159

Someone tried this on me once in a grocery store. Except i didn't do anything except stand there as their kid actually DID bust his head open. When i stopped to see if he was ok because there was no parent in sight, i started walking towards a cop i saw with the kid. His mother rounds the corner and starts yelling at me. Called me all kinds of names using all kinds of profanity, called me a pedophile rapist child molester kidnapper etc. Cop saw all this happen, walked over, and put her in cuffs.…
/r/MensRights20/11/12 11:46 PM
3

It's got less to do with the shit you're babbling here and more to do with they're a bunch of babbling retards that make us all look bad.
/r/MensRights20/11/12 05:08 AM
0

And my only point is those fears are inconsistent with statistics.
/r/MensRights18/11/12 08:27 PM
0

So all homeless people are mentally ill? Last i checked the number for mental health issues among homeless was more around 40%, with it being closer to 20-25% for serious mental illness. You're basically implying that nobody in a homeless shelter would either attempt to stop or report an assault. I say no less than any ordinary person in most cases. Fact of the matter is i've volunteered at these places and have experienced the people in them, and no, within my experience, assault within the she…
/r/MensRights18/11/12 08:18 PM
1

Local PD sends two cops out there in shifts at night for free. Dunno about the other shelters here. Second part of your sentence makes no sense.
/r/MensRights18/11/12 08:11 PM
1

Last homeless shelter i saw the inside of had one huge very public room with a shitload of people in it to sleep in. If something happened, not just someone, alot of people would notice very quickly. Not to mention they kept a police presence at night. This is a poor excuse to say the least.
/r/MensRights18/11/12 07:06 AM
0

Strong words for someone who can't read.
/r/MensRights14/11/12 09:40 PM
-1

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poe%27s_law Educate yourself.
/r/MensRights14/11/12 09:32 PM
0

it's a guy talking about a news article, quit being a paranoid fuck
/r/MensRights14/11/12 09:10 PM
7

If i were alone in a bathroom and saw this sign, i'd piss on it.
/r/MensRights13/11/12 11:15 PM
2

If they want to be held to this standard make it law that any woman going out must be accompanied by a man. Obviously they won't protect themselves, and men are supposed to be the protectors, so take it back to the fucking bronze age.
/r/MensRights12/11/12 12:02 AM
29

PTA probably won't get you anywhere.
/r/MensRights10/11/12 01:43 AM
15

So she destroyed $5,000 in property? That's a felony. She should be in prison.
/r/MensRights08/11/12 09:49 PM
1

Perhaps he should be? hah.
/r/MensRights31/10/12 04:21 AM
-2

It's often only the men that are required to pitch in more work when someone goes on maternity leave.
/r/MensRights25/09/12 07:39 PM
1

Actually not true. Many parts of the immune system are attatched to the X chromosome, which women get two of.
/r/MensRights25/09/12 07:37 PM
1

How about we all stop being such pussies about words? They're human inventions, and we are the only ones capable of giving words power and meaning as humans. The more people realize that censoring things to avoid offending people just causes people to be even more easily offended in the end the better off we'll be.
/r/MensRights25/09/12 07:35 PM
18

If i got in a shouting match with any woman at my workplace, i'd be fired immediately. You're lucky.
/r/MensRights21/09/12 11:36 PM
7

Feminists don't seem to understand that our shitty legal system has turned divorce into a career. Actually, many of them do, and actively promote the use of marriage and divorce as a means of making a living.
/r/MensRights09/09/12 06:00 PM
2

And a great encouragement for whoever is being contested against to get the most expensive lawyer they can possibly find. Lawyer-fee bullying is fun.
/r/MensRights09/09/12 05:51 PM
3

Well, at least two of those generalizations are true for most people in general. Most humans aren't rational beings and most humans are selfish.
/r/MensRights08/09/12 05:44 PM
1

It's hard to call someone a pussy when you're crying and snotting all over the place from getting pepper sprayed. My solution: Pepper spray his coworkers.
/r/MensRights26/08/12 09:06 PM
1

Tummy tucks and face lifts are cosmetic surgeries normally performed on informed and consenting adults. By informed i mean they have been informed of the dangers of the procedure, and by consenting i mean that the individual having the operation performed on them can directly refuse the surgery, themselves, without input from others. A circumcision is performed on an infant, that has no capability to make any decision, let alone an informed one, at a very early stage in life where complications …
/r/MensRights24/08/12 10:43 PM
2

Circumcision is the removal of the foreskin, not the entire penis, it does not impact the function of the penis in anyway, That's you specifically, got a friend who's a doctor who's seen guys come in with the long-ignored results of a botched circumcision. It's not pretty. From small things like a curvature that shouldn't be there to the head of the penis having to sensation what so ever to the foreskin being cut too short so that any time they become erect it's painful. Shit can really fuck you…
/r/MensRights24/08/12 09:17 PM
2

Because the state collects a portion of ALL child support payments. It's about money. When a woman sues for child support, not only does she get paid, the state gets paid. Therefore it is in the best interest of the state to always reward child support no matter what. The system is and has been flawed from the start. The flaw is the fact that there is monetary influence for the state. State shouldn't get anything from child support.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 07:20 PM
-3

Dunno, i guess i just don't understand the victim mentality. I don't understand how you can be in a situation like that, and not want to get out of it. I don't understand how a woman can be with a man who beats her every night and then believe him when he apologizes and says he'll never do it again. I don't understand how someone can watch their child get raped and not kill, or attempt to kill the person doing it. I don't understand how you can be so lost on a mentality that you don't fight back…
/r/MensRights20/08/12 07:59 PM
-1

...did he change after the marriage or was he always that way? Because if she married a guy who was already abusive... what the fuck did she expect?
/r/MensRights20/08/12 07:25 PM
4

You're a twit that has obviously never had a longstanding sexual relationship. At least not a healthy one. After a certain point, consent becomes implied and it becomes more about no than yes.
/r/MensRights20/08/12 07:04 PM
4

Yeah, but it's your own damn fault for being that drunk. That's like claiming you were too drunk to be responsible for yourself when you got hammered got in a car and killed a family in a car accident, so therefore you shouldn't face the consequences.
/r/MensRights20/08/12 06:53 PM
3

Neither of them wanted it but neither felt able to fight him off or go to the authorities. That's the problem right there. The woman wasn't fucking thinking. She wasn't using her brain. One call to the cops would have ended it all immediately, and if she cared about her daughter she would have done it. There's got to be more to this story than "he raped them every night".
/r/MensRights20/08/12 06:48 PM
8

Mute/Ignore exists in pretty much every online game since 00.
/r/MensRights17/08/12 07:04 PM
5

Faggot, nigger, noob, eerily detailed depiction of raping your mother and force-feeding her her own feces while you watch, 2-3 minute long rants about how bad and horrible you are, every insult imaginable, etc. are pretty goddamn even with "sexual harassment". If you think "make me a sammich woman" or "tits or GTFO" are bad, you haven't spent much time in online video games.
/r/MensRights17/08/12 06:59 PM
1

You punch them in the nose and make them cry too.
/r/MensRights05/08/12 04:38 PM
6

That's EXACTLY what has been going on for decades. Custody defaults to the mother. Not in the official written law, but it's policy in most courtrooms in America. They basically said the father would be unable to support the kid at his "current standard of living" because he had to move from the house they shared to an apartment of his own, per the divorce. She got the house, he got most of the bank savings and the car. Court basically said since she got the house and had a better paying job she…
/r/MensRights03/08/12 02:59 PM
5

The problem is many women consider hopping between different wealthy men to BE a career.
/r/MensRights03/08/12 06:15 AM
10

I'll give you an example, something that actually happened to someone i know. He got divorced, was a stay at home dad teaching guitar lessons for extra cash, and raising his son, while his wife went to work. This was something they decided together at the time because he's better with kids, and she made more money, it just worked. Then they had problems, and eventually split. The courts gave their son to his wife, sole custody, because she made more money. On the other hand, another friend of mi…
/r/MensRights03/08/12 06:13 AM
3

Must be a state by state thing then. I've got a friend who recently divorced and managed to get out of it with neither party paying anything to the other.
/r/MensRights01/08/12 01:39 PM
1

That's probably bullshit, your lawyer wanted more money. I've never heard of anything like that.
/r/MensRights01/08/12 03:57 AM
9

She deserved 20 years. She didn't fire a warning shot according to ballistics in the case, the shot was aimed at his head, he told the real story to first responders, and redacted in court. Most of his testimony was ignored by the court for good reason.
/r/MensRights23/07/12 09:41 PM
29

ONE woman called out daniel tosh. Not the whole audience, not a group of people, one woman got offended. Then she posted on her blog and had a bunch of her friends spread the word about how horrible and abusive daniel tosh is. Only one person actually cared about his rape joke.
/r/MensRights13/07/12 12:30 PM
6

Since when do we hate early feminists? The problem is the recent and current generations of feminism that are slowly shifting away from "women's rights" to "women's power". Early feminists did alot of good.
/r/MensRights13/07/12 12:26 PM
2

Doesn't mean it will happen any time soon.
/r/MensRights13/07/12 03:09 AM
1

It would require completely scrapping the legal system in it's entirely and starting over. Not likely to happen without a total government reboot.
/r/MensRights13/07/12 02:02 AM
14

I damn well wouldn't. 18 years of child support if i miss a pill? NOPE.
/r/MensRights09/07/12 06:41 PM
-2

Which doesn't do anything to resist getting pushed. When you're backing away from someone your own momentum works against you when they decide to push/shove. When she actually threw strikes she did almost zero damage.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 06:07 PM
-6

size != strength I really wish people would fucking understand this. My sister weighs 120 pounds and could have "thrown that kid around" because he wasn't actually doing anything to resist.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 05:12 PM
-17

The two in the video are obviously not 11 and 12 year olds. That's a high school, minimum age is gonna be 13/14. He IS grasping at straws.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 04:05 PM
-6

No, it is not irrelevant, because when a boy becomes a man is roughly the same time he becomes stronger than most women. When he hits puberty and the few years of muscle development that follow. OP is about high school kids, post puberty.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 03:46 PM
-21

11-12 year olds are children, not grown men and women. You're grasping at straws here.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 03:44 PM
-7

At what age, high school? Yes. At 11-12, no, but those aren't men and women, those are children. Stick to post-puberty.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 03:44 PM
-18

Where was i condescending and about what? I think he should have hit her sooner than he did.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 03:19 PM
-11

He tripped off a curb while getting punched in the face. That wasn't a knockout, he still had control of his body and if the video had continued it would have shown him getting back up and forcing her into a vehicle. Don't post bullshit like this.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 03:12 PM
-20

That "button" is usually hit in rapid succession with 2-3 strikes to different sides of the head to perform a knockout in boxing. A one-punch knockout is pretty rare in professional fighting. I've been doing kickboxing for 10 years, i know all about this button. I also know that the female didn't know how to throw a proper punch in the video above, while the guy did. He had a serious striking force advantage from the start and if you actually watch the damn video it's pretty clearly evident that…
/r/MensRights05/07/12 03:09 PM
20

The "average" is also heavily influenced by social expectations. No. Wrong. It's influenced by the FACT that men naturally build more muscle tissue than women. Given the same exact lifestyle, a man will be stronger than a woman, 99% of the time barring some chromosomal or hormonal disorder. Look at male and female bodybuilders, female bodybuilders have to take male hormones to even get CLOSE to the level of muscular development as men get and even at the top levels including women AND men who ab…
/r/MensRights05/07/12 02:49 PM
-39

Here's something you need to learn about what it takes to push someone around. It doesn't take alot of muscle to push somebody who isn't in a proper guarded stance. It only really takes weight. She had the weight advantage, hence when the two bodies collided momentum sided in her favor, not to mention the most resistance he put up before punching her was to back away. However, if you go by the fact that she landed 2-3 clean blows and didn't inflict damage, and he landed one punch and knocked her…
/r/MensRights05/07/12 02:35 PM
-1

No. A 40 year old woman vs a 10 year old boy is NOT a valid example. 10 year old boy is not a "man" in any sense. Underdeveloped muscles and bone structure.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 01:58 PM
46

Men are, on average, stronger than women. That is a fact. Man and woman with the same lifestyle and eating habits, man will have better muscle development because of higher testosterone levels.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 01:55 PM
-30

Height and weight advantage maybe, but he definitely still had her in strength.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 01:54 PM
10

Eh... that's stretching it. He could have shot and killed her and it would have been justified, but beating her to a bloody pulp with his bare hands would have probably landed him in jail/prison. He'd have been better off breaking the arm with the brass knuckles.
/r/MensRights02/07/12 08:34 PM
5

I've been pepper sprayed myself, i definitely consider it a useful self defense tool, great for fending off angry ex-girlfriends.
/r/MensRights02/07/12 08:32 PM
6

As a gun-carrying Floridian, you are dead on.
/r/MensRights02/07/12 08:27 PM
6

Was responding to a poster above me, not to the OP. In the situation in the video the girl with the brass knuckles would have gotten no mercy from me, she lucked the fuck out.
/r/MensRights02/07/12 08:22 PM
3

This was an extreme case, 6'7" 260 pound guy with martial arts training caught a guy right at the joint at the back of the jawline just right and the brass knuckles hooked in so when he followed through, rather than sliding off his jaw like a fist they dug in and ripped his jaw halfway off. Punching someone in the ribs with them is almost guaranteed to crack or break them, face shots usually break bones and cause deformities, etc. They're a really nasty weapon, and carrying them around in the st…
/r/MensRights02/07/12 07:50 PM
4

I've seen a guy's jaw ripped halfway off his face firsthand from brass knuckles(he later died in the hospital), they are deadly and should be treated as deadly as if they are a knife, because they are capable of just as much damage in capable hands. They don't just hurt, they inflict serious injury and THAT is why they're illegal in all 50 states.
/r/MensRights02/07/12 07:38 PM
13

Assault with a deadly weapon trumps assault every time. Remember that, but don't go overboard when someone tries to kill you. Beating the everliving pulp out of someone makes it seem personal.
/r/MensRights02/07/12 07:33 PM
20

And my reaction will be to spray them in the face. It's hard to talk shit while you're crying and snotting all over the place.
/r/MensRights02/07/12 05:58 PM
21

Brass knuckles are considered a deadly weapon and very illegal in all 50 states, he could have knocked her the fuck out and SHE would have gone to jail for anything up to attempted murder.
/r/MensRights02/07/12 05:57 PM
29

Honestly, i hope society does away with this shitty assumption that women can't do damage. All she would have had to do was pick up a brick or a pipe or god knows what else may have been lying in the street one time and whack you in the back of the head and you could be dead before you hit the ground. This is why i follow what the guy in this video did. Back up, warn them 3+ times, and if they keep coming, you're damn straight i'mma hit them. I had a drunk woman come at me with a glass bottle in…
/r/MensRights02/07/12 05:55 PM
-1

Anything that includes "new age" in it's self-description is doomed to fail.
/r/MensRights29/06/12 08:09 PM
1

Funny... churches are supposed to be open to all who want to worship, all the time.
/r/MensRights17/06/12 04:06 AM
3

Still comes off as wrong to me, why not just not imply that one gender is better?
/r/MensRights17/06/12 04:04 AM
1

Truth is she can't. This story will circulate for about a month, and then it will be buried by the thousands of murder and abduction stories coming out of Thailand. Nobody gives two shits about this news story except a few bloggers.
/r/MensRights15/06/12 09:57 PM
17

Humans in general are fucking stupid.
/r/MensRights09/06/12 09:37 PM
24

Whenever i see the word woman spelled "womyn", i immediately go into sarcasm mode and stop taking anything they say seriously because their opinion no longer matters.
/r/MensRights09/06/12 09:22 PM
3

Aspergers isn't over diagnosed to near the extent ADD is in my experience...
/r/MensRights07/06/12 01:01 PM
5

I would have brought the fact that she tried to sell you your daughter to the courts...
/r/MensRights07/06/12 12:51 PM
3

so huffpost is slave labor... good to know.
/r/MensRights01/06/12 01:40 AM
3

Clear difference in strength but the fact of the matter is there are many places where you can cause serious injury with 10-20 pounds of force, and a punch from ANY adult can kill.
/r/MensRights29/05/12 03:27 PM
7

as someone who grew up doing martial arts, and still practices, i can safely say there are some women who can hit WAY the fuck harder than most men. Fact of the matter is most people can't hit that hard, most people don't know how to throw a proper punch, and many that do don't have the muscle memory to actually do it properly every time in a fight. A 150-160 pound female throwing a proper punch can produce plenty of force to seriously fuck somebody up if you hit them in the right places. The me…
/r/MensRights29/05/12 03:22 PM
1

He pleaded out. It was in L.A., not exactly a racism capital of the U.S.
/r/MensRights26/05/12 12:51 PM
1

You can do that without the blackface, you may have to do some crazy shit to get their trust though.
/r/MensRights10/05/12 03:54 PM
13

I wouldn't have been able to keep from becoming violent after something like that. People are so fucking insensitive at funerals sometimes it makes no fucking sense. When my aunt died recently, i didn't really know her. Went to the funeral because my mom wanted me there. When i got there, the first suprise was it was in a church. This was a very strictly atheist woman. It didn't seem odd to ANYBODY that they were in direct opposition of her DYING WORDS which were DO NOT LET A CHURCH NEAR MY CORP…
/r/MensRights06/04/12 05:27 PM
0

It's basically a sign of weakness, your mom is a bitch though because your mother is supposed to be one of the few people men can cry around/with/over and NOT get looked down on for it.
/r/MensRights06/04/12 05:20 PM
-17

Just shut the fuck up you know what i meant.
/r/MensRights30/03/12 08:50 PM
-1

Actually an unwilling vagina can pretty damn different than a willing one. Cervix is normally just a few inches away from the entrance of the vagina when a woman isn't aroused, and ascends lengthening the vagina on arousal.
/r/MensRights30/03/12 08:13 PM
2

Any act of violence is unacceptable unless it's to save yourself from harm. That's where we differ in opinion.
/r/MensRights30/01/12 08:52 PM
4

Her action wasn't a reaction, it was an action, he was the one reacting in this case, and followed by him the crowd that jumped him was also reacting to his reaction. The action in the first place was unacceptable, the first reaction wasn't necessarily the right thing to do, but it was acceptable. But then again I'm a firm believer in the basics of eye for an eye. If someone strikes me, I consider striking back a perfectly reasonable reaction. The fact that i don't discriminate on that policy on…
/r/MensRights29/01/12 05:28 PM
4

Here's what you're not getting. The issue here is how everyone else acted, not him. His actions were perfectly acceptable, he got slapped, he retaliated with a slap. Had he punched her it would be a different story, but he didn't. My question is what the hell makes it ok for the show's host and the audience to attack him. If you can answer that, I'll mail you a medal.
/r/MensRights29/01/12 04:37 PM
5

Fact of the matter is a slap doesn't equate to getting jumped by 30 guys, no matter who the fuck you are/are getting slapped by. I'll take a slap from mike tyson over a punch from my sister.
/r/MensRights29/01/12 04:29 PM
4

Slapping isn't about doing damage, it's about humiliation. If a man slapped him, and he slapped him back, it probably would've turned into a fistfight that would have promptly either been broken up or completely ignored. But since a woman slapped him, and he slapped her back, he was jumped by 30 people. also; the amount of force used DOES NOT FUCKING MATTER. It's a slap, it's degrading and humiliating, not particularly painful. Compared to most men women are women physically. Comparing them chil…
/r/MensRights29/01/12 04:26 PM
2

A court can decide to force you to pay child support even without the DNA test
/r/MensRights09/01/12 09:05 PM
0

The third one is a bit of a stretch. Also; All from italy. Do you really expect anything better from them?
/r/MensRights18/11/11 07:05 PM
2

I'd be fine with either holding both sexes equally responsible OR giving men an equal opt-out opportunity.
/r/MensRights16/11/11 06:08 PM
2

It applies to anyone who is intoxicated, depending on HOW intoxicated, decided by a jury.
/r/MensRights14/10/11 09:57 PM
5

Doesn't change the fact that it's the legal definition.
/r/MensRights14/10/11 09:24 PM
5

How about fuck counting points and props for them doing the good work.
/r/MensRights11/10/11 08:25 AM
3

I think telling a woman to get in the kitchen should be socially acceptable if where she should be is in the kitchen watching the hot grease on the stove.
/r/MensRights05/10/11 05:43 PM
2

Exactly, hunting would be a hell of alot more of a chore if blood solidified or something the second you die like some people seem to think.
/r/MensRights30/09/11 04:26 PM
1

Hitting someone once and running away deserves and even harder asskicking than just starting a fight.
/r/MensRights29/09/11 03:00 PM
7

The other two guys got punched in the face/head, and are probably pissed at him. They're got just as much reason to lie as he does. TBH this entire case is a waste of the court system's money.
/r/MensRights29/09/11 02:58 PM
2

The more people around the less likely you will be attacked in the first place.
/r/MensRights24/09/11 03:40 AM
11

Anyone who actually knew anything about jails and prisons would know that there's a difference between the two and the terms are NOT used interchangeably.
/r/MensRights13/09/11 02:42 PM
1

I live in Jacksonville FL, largest city in the U.S. in square mileage. I can get anywhere in this city with a bike and a bus pass in less than 3 hours. That's in a city of 885 square miles, with really shitty public transportation. I guarantee you that your city is a bikeable one, assuming the busses have bike racks. Most well-traveled places i can get to in under an hour or two, because the bus routes to those places are more direct.
/r/MensRights02/08/11 11:44 PM
14

That's a long-ass leap from "getting around" to going on trips and the like. Why is it not acceptable for them to ride with you for a camping trip? I can understand not wanting to have to move them around town, to and from work, to the bank, to the store, etc. but road trips? THAT is a dealbreaker for you? Having to pick someone up to go on a camping trip?
/r/MensRights02/08/11 09:13 PM
2

Actually it kinda was.
/r/MensRights25/07/11 02:41 PM
3

Now I just want to accumulate capital and real estate till I can afford to live in a third world country and witness the Decline and Fall of Western Civilization from far away. It really wouldn't take that much.
/r/MensRights29/06/11 03:10 AM
-1

Quick! Call NAMBLA!
/r/MensRights23/06/11 04:56 PM
2

Well, i apologize for exploding but i see that crap all the time on this subreddit, and more than half the time they're being serious. Sarcasm doesn't translate too well through text.
/r/MensRights20/06/11 03:29 PM
1

How the FUCK does the US government control who cancer effects? Isn't it based on being predisposed to it mixed with carcinogens followed by random bullshit chance? Mix that with men generally being less likely to go to the doctor over symptoms that seem "minor", so they might not catch cancer until the later stages when symptoms become serious.
/r/MensRights20/06/11 03:12 PM
0

How about just lung cancer campaigns for everyone, seeing as it's something that effects both sexes pretty much equally after accounting for less smoking women. Breast cancer effects women disproportionately. We've already got prostate cancer campaigns. That's our equivalent. Stop trying to trade privledge for privledge and actually strike out for equality. Otherwise you're no better than the "man-hating feminists" that this reddit so despises.
/r/MensRights20/06/11 03:10 PM
2

Where the hell in that post did i advocate slapping anyone? Please, tell me.
/r/MensRights17/06/11 09:46 AM
2

You seem to be emphasizing the face as some holy area that should never be struck on a child, i say it's far less painful and far less likely to seriously injure the child than many other areas of the body, so it's alot less bad than it could be. As someone who grew up experiencing both proper corporal punishment and physical abuse, along with "psychological abuse">(i use that loosely, but things said had far more damaging effects on my life than getting punched ever did) growing up, i'd have to…
/r/MensRights17/06/11 09:42 AM
4

I think the biggest issue is people taking the idea that children need to be protected a little too far. Yes, they need to be protected to an extent. But that doesn't mean a little bit of pain or lack isn't a GOOD thing for a developing child. You have TWO jobs as a parent, to PROTECT your child until they are ready for the world, and to PREPARE them for the real world. Many people make the mistake of only doing the former in today's world.
/r/MensRights17/06/11 03:36 AM
16

As someone with a considerable amount of experience in both hitting people in the face and making people bleed, ("ex"Martial Artist, not currently practicing) it REALLY doesn't take much force at all to make someone bleed from the mouth, i mean it really. If i hit you from the right angle i could do it by flicking you with one finger, at the same time I've punched people bare-fisted in the mouth full force and not drawn blood. Drawing blood is irrelevant in the case of minor strikes to the face.…
/r/MensRights17/06/11 01:53 AM
2

I know that it actually does happen, and how it happens, i was just wondering if there was any legal justification for it.
/r/MensRights11/06/11 06:50 AM
4

I have a question. If in a criminal case it must be proven beyond reasonable doubt that you committed a crime, how can hesaid/shesaid cases ever be convicted? Without physical evidence, there is ALWAYS reasonable doubt. People lie. We're flawed by definition. We don't even need a reason to lie in some cases. It's perfectly reasonable to say "Well, if one person says one thing, and another says another, one of them is lying and without any evidence to back either of them, neither can be believed …
/r/MensRights10/06/11 01:55 PM
1

Timing is everything.
/r/MensRights08/06/11 10:36 PM
4

What the fuck are you even talking about?
/r/MensRights08/06/11 09:58 AM
1

I'll probably be there. You probably won't know who i am.
/r/MensRights08/06/11 08:51 AM
2

So what you're saying is we should be egalitarians. I wholeheartedly agree, but it will never happen.
/r/MensRights08/06/11 06:40 AM
2

Men needed women raise children. Women needed men to protect and provide for them so they could raise children. This was why the gender roles first developed. Those reasons are completely irrelevant in today's society, people are just slow to change by nature. Edit for clarity because some people are idiots.
/r/MensRights08/06/11 06:29 AM
0

There's nothing there really, other than me living in Jacksonville FL.
/r/MensRights08/06/11 06:20 AM
3

Playing the concerned parent is a first class ticket to downvotes in /r/mensrights
/r/MensRights08/06/11 05:39 AM
4

Just get the fuck out.
/r/MensRights08/06/11 05:37 AM
3

New York has a metric shitton of people. Metric shitton of people = metric shitton of paranoia due to child molestation cases being blown up by the media, they will report a story for months at a time, people end up thinking there are more cases of it happening than there actually are. Another thing that people don't seem to get, your child is more at risk when he's visiting a family friend or their aunt/uncle than in a public place. Child molestation is almost always done by someone who knows t…
/r/MensRights08/06/11 05:34 AM
3

Fuck you for responding with fuck you. You gave an opinion while describing how they worked, he was completely justified in taking issue with your opinion. Also; the sex offender paranoia you're propagating right now is one of the key problems regarding the men's rights movement. Maybe you should think about what you just said.
/r/MensRights08/06/11 05:29 AM
3

It's a really nice idea because parents can actually relax for a second and not have to worry about horrific shit happening to their children. It's this part you're being downvoted for, most likely.
/r/MensRights08/06/11 05:26 AM
2

There's a massive difference between a doctor's office visit and being in a locker room, to be honest. While it is a genuine issue, and bullshit, the two issues cannot be compared.
/r/MensRights04/06/11 02:59 PM
3

So, hair is a secondary sexual organ? Or was it the skin?
/r/MensRights15/03/11 06:06 AM
2

Thank you for both being a now obvious troll AND double posting!
/r/MensRights15/03/11 04:40 AM
1

I'm fucking ripped... under the inch or so of fat.
/r/MensRights14/03/11 10:28 PM
0

I give them money and fuck them.
/r/MensRights14/03/11 10:27 PM
5

A man doing this would show... a chest, possibly with hair on it. A woman shows her breasts. If i wore a low cut top, it would show a flat piece of skin with hair on it. A closer example would be if i went in wearing pants that only partially covered my ass. Showing ass-cleavage, you might call it.
/r/MensRights14/03/11 10:22 PM
2

Ask if he can help pay, offer to pay him back over time. I guarantee he will accept that over the fear of the alternative of 18 years of child support payments. Even if you don't say it, don't even hint at it, he'll be thinking about it.
/r/MensRights02/03/11 04:56 AM
1

Being a whiny little bitch is what faggots who polluted this community do while being fucked up the ass by their grandfather and his boyfriend.
/r/MensRights01/03/11 11:24 PM
1

Length of time on reddit has nothing to do with you whining like a little bitch. Whining like a little bitch does just as much to decrease the quality of discourse on reddit as not following your imaginary guidelines.
/r/MensRights01/03/11 10:48 PM
0

He's right, you are.
/r/MensRights01/03/11 10:47 PM
1

I personally, along with other people it would seem, saw it in the context of the post he was replying to, referring specifically to women. Maybe we should apply it to women too. No abortions allowed, but it's easy! In response to your question, if a woman is raped, she still has the choice of putting the child up for adoption, even without abortion being an option, and denounce all responsibility for the child after it's adopted off. A guy can't have any say in this. If the guy is raped, it's u…
/r/MensRights25/02/11 09:29 PM
3

The laws are what need to change, to prevent bullshit like this from happening in the first place. Shit won't change until it changes in the courtroom.
/r/MensRights25/02/11 12:04 AM
9

If you have sex with people you don't or can't trust, its a very real possibility that a kid will result with all the legal and financial complications that come with Let me put it to you this way. A friend of mine was dating a girl for three years, after 3 years with a person you obviously think you can trust them, and do. She was on the pill. One day, she decided she wanted a kid and stopped taking the pill without telling him. She got pregnant, he broke up with her because of this. Now, 2 yea…
/r/MensRights24/02/11 10:45 PM
6

Outside of birth control, a woman has the choice of an abortion or adoption. In the U.S. abortions are very much available to most women, usually regardless of financial situation. Exceptions may be in some areas of the southern U.S. and exceptionally rural areas. Adoption is an option for all. After conception, the man has no such option. He just has to deal with whatever the woman decides to do. Usually meaning child support payments for the next 18 years of his life for a child he did not wan…
/r/MensRights24/02/11 09:54 PM
5

The woman has the choice to avoid motherhood even if there is a pregnancy. The man doesn't get that choice, he's fucked after conception.
/r/MensRights24/02/11 09:46 PM
2

Because men can't be raped or coerced into sex, or be too intoxicated to consent, etc etc etc.
/r/MensRights24/02/11 09:45 PM
3

you may not set up a charity that gives financial benefits to the needy. That's more than a bit ridiculous. What the hell is the point of a charity if not to help the needy?
/r/MensRights17/02/11 05:08 PM
1

There ARE alot of jobs where women make less. Usually in industries that include alot of physical labor. This, however, is just good business, nobody can argue with the fact that on average women aren't as physically strong as men are, and therefore on average aren't capable of performing physical labor at the same level of efficiency as men. This doesn't mean women cant be stronger than men, but then it also doesn't mean exceptionally hard working women, who work as hard as or harder than the m…
/r/MensRights14/02/11 02:25 AM
10

Because gay men can't possibly like kids the same way women do.
/r/MensRights24/01/11 05:21 AM
3

As far as equal pay in the workplace goes, as someone who has worked in several different working environments i have this to say. When i worked construction, generally the women got paid less, same thing when i worked on the docks at the local port, but the starting pay was the same for everyone. This made sense to me. The women were generally slower and less capable of performing the work. These women who were incapable of working at the same pace as the men, or incapable of performing the sam…
/r/MensRights14/01/11 04:47 PM
2

If nobody speaks out against them, they will simply be able to spout their garbage unhindered, which is how they recruit more women to join their fringe movement. If unhindered, they could much more easily become the majority, which is something we should NOT allow to happen.
/r/MensRights14/01/11 04:29 PM
10

Why do any of you give a shit what these retarded cunts say?
/r/MensRights03/01/11 12:59 PM
1

You're assuming that he hasn't already talked to his fiancee about these things.
/r/MensRights26/12/10 08:33 AM
1

Your name kinda kills off any chance of people taking you seriously, bro.
/r/MensRights26/12/10 07:36 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter