TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

YIdothis Archive

View 16 posts and 170 comments by YIdothis on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
34

YIdothis/r/MensRights18/04/11 01:22 AM
14

YIdothis/r/MensRights21/04/11 12:19 AM
13

YIdothis/r/MensRights18/04/11 05:39 PM
7

YIdothis/r/MensRights30/04/11 06:28 AM
7

YIdothis/r/MensRights19/05/11 08:35 AM
6

YIdothis/r/MensRights30/04/11 02:53 AM
6

YIdothis/r/MensRights26/04/11 05:32 AM
5

YIdothis/r/MensRights29/04/11 02:25 AM
4

YIdothis/r/MensRights16/04/11 01:08 AM
4

YIdothis/r/MensRights25/04/11 11:26 PM
2

YIdothis/r/MensRights21/04/11 01:20 AM
2

YIdothis/r/MensRights28/04/11 05:54 PM
2

YIdothis/r/MensRights26/04/11 10:23 AM
2

YIdothis/r/MensRights18/04/11 07:45 PM
0

YIdothis/r/MensRights29/04/11 09:20 PM
0

YIdothis/r/MensRights23/04/11 11:40 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Can you give me one example of an issue where the Left supports genuine equality over female privilege? The Left is dominated by feminist viewpoints. Therefore, empowering the left is a step forward for feminism. I will give you that NALAMF's (Not all leftists are militant feminists.) Well I don't fully know what you are classifying as "The Left".. There are too many political hypotheses and theories that are often used interchangably with that category. Not only that, but I am European and you …
/r/MensRights19/05/11 05:18 PM
2

My point was that any support of the Left, however well-intentioned, aided a feminist-dominated worldview. I don't see this being the case globally. I also don't see the validity in it. You take an entire range in a political spectrum and state some arbitrary line that if crossed brands you on the left and is as intent on being a part of an extreme. For example, endorsement of the right by this same measure makes everyone on the right side associatable with fascism.. This is not that dissimilar …
/r/MensRights19/05/11 04:00 PM
3

Err, what did you think you were saying.. Because I don't think you said it clearly through all that, "I had my fun but my little angel ain't gonna be getting all treated like a whore".. Your daughter is not a special case. Regardless of your views on that matter. I agree that it shouldn't be the case with this blatant and promoted promiscuity as the standard. Concurrently, your not exactly making any cases. With all the "troll" branding, you did a good job of being a troll yourself.
/r/MensRights19/05/11 03:47 PM
1

Good work.. I wish you a happy and successful family life. Thanks for sharing here too, it is inspiring to see this amongst the general abundance of contrasting information. I'm proud of you man. (Not intended as patronising)
/r/MensRights19/05/11 03:35 PM
0

Which was what exactly? If you can synopsis it into a few key points that is. I have one criticism for this piece. The article does not make any distinctions, rather it makes some loose contrasts without defining them first e.g. A major part of progressivism is the development of a smart effective government (or at least to the point a government can be effective). This position can be the perspective of any political theory/ideology, just as inanely placed in the terms of a statist regime as th…
/r/MensRights19/05/11 03:31 PM
1

Okay, a single issue that struck me before most others is the aspect of PAS is a compounded disorder. The elements researched are normally small parts. Whatever they say about the research, the issue of it being non-scientific raised (and concurrently associating its terminology with discredited campaigns, i.e. climate denialism) only give emphasis to a lack of synthesis on the parts of advocates. Each contributing factor is what joins together to create a syndrome. So all I really am saying is …
/r/MensRights19/05/11 05:42 AM
2

The book initially took the aim of debunking the "e-z guide" mentality of self-help etc, and then swiftly declined into an order = perfection montage. I found that slightly ironic too.. There are some helpful hints though, yet once it reached the assertions of Order/Entropy, Disorder/Chaos, Absolutes/Relativism, I switched off. The clout loses flavour when the book's initial criticisms are so readily and easily possible to invert in upon itself. It is worth a read however and makes some valid po…
/r/MensRights17/05/11 05:45 PM
2

Aside from the "he said, she said" problem facing men in line with false accusations, quite simply applying feminised systems may be a useful tool. A record of all accusers who are deemed to be fraudsters could show the discrepancies in the laws. If a man is found guilty, he can be registered as a sex criminal. A registry for false accusations should be established. Not to mention a notice of what effects such accusations actually hold. As for conviction, a combination of sentencing for fraud, s…
/r/MensRights17/05/11 05:11 PM
3

Yes that is child abuse. Like the others say, get in contact with a lawyer. Would your son be capable/able to get some evidence for the case?
/r/MensRights17/05/11 01:16 PM
1

the population will be extremely resistant to change be it originating from the inside or the outside. Not that extremely.. A greater deal of information available increases the attempts of a state to restrain it. Unfortunately for you, that model you just described is a wee bit oversimplistic and outdated. Even with a little consideration for information systems. The critical mass of a communities information intake is determined by the surpression of said information. Enough people notice anyt…
/r/MensRights08/05/11 08:59 PM
1

I would contest on the UN being as even-headed or resilient to confusion/pressure as you would think. They have recently been in a swing of applying then repealing gay rights. As for the EU, their situation is not one in which research is their strength. It is not a reliable fact finding entity, it is a administrative, economic and judicial body based on influence from the pressure groups of national governments.
/r/MensRights06/05/11 03:02 AM
1

I'm from Ireland and am in residence in the UK, I am somewhat informed of the governmental bodies of EU states inclusive of EU central government. Quazz's inspection stands to reason as the elected officials of all the EU governments remain susceptible to "lobby" influence. Though you may know them as "pressure/special interests groups" who invest in parties and candidates who represent the most pragmatic utility in their political goals. Feminism as an entity still exists as extremist and moder…
/r/MensRights06/05/11 02:44 AM
1

Yet said crazy was not harmless, nor were her colleagues, they were in a position of political influence and had access to the vulnerable who were in turn proliferating messages of misandry. I can't see your argument standing very long as it is yourself who is presenting an apologetics stance throughout this thread. For one, you vehemently stand as a feminist in defense in many comments above. Even asserting that Feminism = Egalitarianism, and nonetheless still continue to ascertain the faulty c…
/r/MensRights06/05/11 02:21 AM
0

However the science of sex and neuroscience are shoddy to say the least Firstly, whilst neither agreeing nor disagreeing, please elaborate as to what drew you to this conclusion. It doesn't take a scientist to figure out that less educated women equals less female scientists. Education in a subject may contribute to the extent to which a person may be informed in a matter, but does not necessarily entail that they are proficient in the discipline. Also, there is a great deal of issues that also …
/r/MensRights06/05/11 02:13 AM
1

Sadly the economy has pulled a number on Sweden and ther are more and more stay home wives now. almost 200000 more men than women have jobs in the country now. Ask yourself.. In the 40 so years of the elevation of feminist presence, is the supposed "patriarchy" responsible for this effect? Or is it still possible that biology or prejudice has made this consequence a reality? Should you claim that it is men's faults that even with pro-action many women are resorting to housewivery whilst men are …
/r/MensRights06/05/11 02:00 AM
1

Adopt the title MRA then.. Or alternatively, adopt the title egalitarian, so you know that you are being very clear with what you represent. You really are missing the point people are making.
/r/MensRights06/05/11 01:56 AM
2

I didn't come here to argue, take it easy. I came here to learn. What learning are you trying to undertake? Assertion - Confirmation - reiterate? An argument is not designated as a persuasion or necessarily a truth. An argument is a logical tool that is used to learn. Here, read this and double-check what reason you have for a faulty assumption like "I didn't come here to argue.."
/r/MensRights06/05/11 01:51 AM
1

a good egalitarian argument if you present it as feminist. And for all I care, it is feminist. Then you are failing to understand what constitutes the limitations of a definition. Hypothetical example. I am an applist.. I represent the equality of apples in rights to germinate, bear fruit and be harvested. The premise of my dispute is that there are too many pears being harvested, germinated and grown. This to me is a sign of the oppression of apple harvesting. There should be equality of apples…
/r/MensRights06/05/11 01:27 AM
1

Or a picture of a spanner with the caption: "Possessor =|= possession"
/r/MensRights06/05/11 12:34 AM
1

I think I would not want to return there either if that happened to me.
/r/MensRights05/05/11 10:19 PM
1

So I was in court, right, and was found guilty of something. I'm in Jail now, sure wish I knew what the hell my crime was.. - Kafka (The Trial - abridged)
/r/MensRights05/05/11 08:19 PM
1

Maybe, maybe not. Guys could be looking for something to actually give them the adrenaline surge that may make their lives somewhat less dreary. Aztecs may have actually had more of that though. Like, I don't know, counter-slaver defense and regular wars that needed fighting?
/r/MensRights03/05/11 07:59 PM
1

Hmm.. Interesting. So when Marx wrote a "skeleton" manifesto, it was really a matter of "believe X,Y and Z" and "have faith in these principles - then reality will fall into place" being rhetoric. Whilst those who did have faith in the concept but not in the execution they resorted to extreme measures in order to attain an end which was really a pseudo-scientific goal with little basis in fact but the sway of rhetorical motivation. In as much that the premises were fundamentally faulty, but for …
/r/MensRights03/05/11 07:48 PM
1

Indeed it is, but attempting to hold the cards on information is the same as attempting to hold all the cards on progeny. Its not a matter of giving evolution a chance, its a matter of attempting to engineer society through as much control of its mutative features as possible. The general failing though appears to be omission of the inherent means of dissemination of said control. One may attempt to monopolise a means of production through restriction, but the mutation of product is a matter of …
/r/MensRights02/05/11 01:51 PM
2

So in summation, Marx pushed the idea: The authorship rights go to the victors. Assure dominant victory to ensure controlling interest. This is one element of the similarity between feminism & oligarchy. Unfortunately for this premise to be viable there is the need to reliably censor all means of presenting alternatives. This never works though, because by whatever means one propagates information, that information is susceptable to memetic mutation. And with this internet invention of ours, tha…
/r/MensRights02/05/11 01:41 PM
9

This one time, me and some of my guy friends fought for the fun of it.. True story. People didn't understand man.. So we put some philosophical premises on having a fun session of blowing off steam and getting a kick out of competition. Whatever their reasons, I like the idea, but fuck, why be so pretentious about the whole endeavour?
/r/MensRights02/05/11 01:29 PM
1

The IMF rearrangement of Irish economic affairs is bad enough, the fact that there exists massive resentment due to its enforcement without referendum is bad enough, but this woman is deluded further by thinking it is justifiable via so called feminist rationale. Repulsive.
/r/MensRights02/05/11 02:50 AM
1

And most (not all - i mention tomboys) girls would often resort to seeking someone to stop play that was rough and competitive rather than either increasing their tenacity or accepting their limitations to compete. And thank you.
/r/MensRights02/05/11 01:47 AM
1

Have you a source for this?
/r/MensRights01/05/11 07:35 PM
2

You also mentioned that your core disciplines were conjecture-based, i.e. literary/philosophical.. BA. English (emphasis in literary theory), BA. Philosophy (emphasis in the philosophy of science), MA Cultural Studies. So to give you the benefit of the doubt and maybe expand your knowledge on the matter, consider this social psychology paper as one source for you to mull over. http://www.ssc.wisc.edu/~jpiliavi/965/hoggterrywhite.pdf
/r/MensRights01/05/11 07:07 PM
2

OK, I am probably going to seem a little odd here. The X chromosome may be considered like a scaffold branch of the chromosome for human genetic information. A storage container of sorts. A double X chromosome allows for the carrying of additional information, but minimises the potential for mutation. A Y chromosome tied to a scaffold X normally acts not as a deficiency or an advantage, but rather the intentional ommision of genetic data sort of turbo-boosts it mutable potential. So if you remov…
/r/MensRights01/05/11 06:08 PM
1

Cheers man, I appreciate your intellectual honesty in this regard, and by no means am I going to assume your credibility as a role model based solely on a single comment, but as a matter of humour, you presented a great piece. My kudos to you sir, tip of the hat
/r/MensRights30/04/11 10:50 PM
1

The specifics are going to come along in time. I'm putting this in here so that at least people can find it. Criticism taken under consideration. Thanks.
/r/MensRights30/04/11 10:11 PM
1

This was great.. But don't know if you are in it for the money or great justice. Would you like both?
/r/MensRights30/04/11 08:36 AM
1

http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/guy9f/a_thoughtful_video_to_assist_people_with/
/r/MensRights30/04/11 06:29 AM
1

Do you mind if I copy and publish this?
/r/MensRights30/04/11 03:44 AM
0

You already know how naive and idiotic I can be, don't ya? HERP DE DERP
/r/MensRights30/04/11 03:33 AM
7

Oh disposable_human, you epic man. Kill it with fire and drench it in piss are possibly the two greatest responses to this attitude, and you killed them with this one. Its a shame it didn't work out kloo.. It really was.
/r/MensRights30/04/11 03:20 AM
1

Right back at ya
/r/MensRights30/04/11 02:43 AM
1

But never make the mistake of telling me what to believe, or what "real" mens activism is again. Do that, and we'll get along fine enough. You are threatening someone on the internet who does not agree with you, and you expect to intimidate me. Get some sense man, and we will get along a-ok. Otherwise, go fuck yourself. I won't even reciprocate that level of pathetic indignation with a counter-threat. Would you prefer another few rounds? Or shall we call it quits?
/r/MensRights30/04/11 02:28 AM
1

Learning is fun Great list man.
/r/MensRights30/04/11 01:42 AM
1

Thanks.. inserts new subroutine into bullshit detector module
/r/MensRights30/04/11 01:40 AM
1

The things you take issue with center primarily around religious themes. This is endemic to the MRM, and we are NEITHER atheist nor Religious Religious themes are endemic to the MRM? Could you clarify this, because I honestly don't know what you mean here. Of course my opinions are my own, and I never once state that my views ARE the views of the MRM, but when I say they are a summary of others work, I'm not blowing sunshine. For example, if Paul disagreed with this article, he would have said s…
/r/MensRights30/04/11 01:19 AM
2

That sounds like a good read. Could I get a link to that off you?
/r/MensRights29/04/11 10:21 PM
1

No man, you tried to tell me what is and isn't a "mens rights issue". I know what is about being male and being discriminated against by law and normative behaviours.. But I can stop at that instead of taking the mantle of men to hide behind it to make others listen to irrelevant side-tracked nonsense. I'll do whatever the fuck I like, thank you very much. And as for what is 'mainstream MRM' or not, I think I have a pretty good handle on that, since I've been around for quite a while. Do it, you…
/r/MensRights29/04/11 10:15 PM
10

"Owning Your Shit: One woman's quest for gender equality" - Quality title there. Damn good article. I think I may get this blogspot shit. My own blogspot shit.
/r/MensRights29/04/11 09:05 PM
1

It was a piece of writing which was critiqued. You may not like the criticisms, but it is not a personal thing to call out the problems with a piece of writing. You were appearing to think I was out to target you or your right to believe what you want, I wasn't. Look man, I took what you said and I addressed it as it was presented. The major detractors from a groups credibility, I attempted to address. Then you got all personally offended and now you call me an asshole for it. Its not you man, i…
/r/MensRights29/04/11 08:25 PM
1

I see this as part of the problems that face men, particularly young men and boys growing up in these backgrounds. It being about the hijacking of the feminists of the community care initiative Erin started. It is the source of many DV issues in this regard.
/r/MensRights29/04/11 05:30 PM
2

Historians have shown all sorts of correlation between Biblical stories and Historical fact. Many scientific principles that were 'undiscovered' until recently are also outlined in the Bible. Hell, Genesis comes awful close to describing the Big Bang perfectly... No it doesn't. (Notice how when you make an assertion without citing, I can make an equal and opposite assertion - doesn't make it true however many times you say it) I do not need to 'pick a team' like some people do. No, no you don't.…
/r/MensRights29/04/11 02:24 PM
5

Do you know what you are talking about? Men's rights is about males. This is the story of a boy aged fifteen being abused. Whatever your stance on the matter, that is the reason why this is an issue for men's rights. Please apply greater intellectual rigour.
/r/MensRights28/04/11 09:28 PM
4

As a matter of semantics and not argument: MRA variations: Men's rights advocate - person who seeks to represent equality (and conversely address inequality) of legislation for men and boys Men's right Activist - person who actively seeks to raise awareness and highlight the concerns of men and boys (due to inequalities in legislature, sociology, psychology, etc) Don't know how many agree here with these definitions, but its my take on the matter.
/r/MensRights28/04/11 06:59 PM
1

It was a meme reference. Not a directed comment consistent with normal everyday speech - see my previous post.
/r/MensRights28/04/11 06:53 PM
3

It may be a point of contest here, but should women in countries with conscription be forced to fight or die, you would see a resolution to the question come barreling round the corner fairly quickly.
/r/MensRights28/04/11 06:50 PM
11

I just don't know what other word I could use to describe myself as someone who seeks equality. Gender-equalist is the closest thing I can think of. Egalitarian or Gender-Egalitarian are applicable terms. (Caveat is that the MRM is not attributed or credited) It can be hard to not feel victimized as a woman in some situations, because I find that the media and society often lead us to that conclusion. Likewise for males feeling the pressure that they are not being allowed to be victims. Its a st…
/r/MensRights28/04/11 06:42 PM
7

Good for you guys. Seriously. Too long have feminist organizations and agendas dragged media focus away from equality and onto the apparent victimization of women. Would you be willing to provide your support in extent beyond kind words? Although the words are nice, and thank you. As a feminist, should you be in attendance with other "feminists" do you believe your MRM positivity inspire you to argue the case? Would you consider adding MRA to that self-labeling process ("I'm a...)? We need to re…
/r/MensRights28/04/11 06:11 PM
2

So you dismiss one source because it's "biased", then offer sources from a Darwinist site as "unbiased"? I gave you a link so you could read the material that was under scrutiny in the link you sent. It is your judgement to take someone else's word for it or base your opinion on conjecture rather than the primary source. I am not a religious man. I haven't been to Church in decades, and I have NO faith in religion. This makes no sense. You are willing to believe the Church (the voxpopuli of Chri…
/r/MensRights28/04/11 05:48 PM
2

I didn't disagree with the approaches that could be used, I disagreed with the major elements that would only further detract from the credibility of the movement. When you get into a position like this, for ALL men, it really should be noted that differences between men exist in mentality and principles. The only thing that need concern us is that no man may be disadvantaged by society - regardless. "Think for yourself and let others enjoy the privilege to do so too" - Voltaire, Essay on Tolera…
/r/MensRights28/04/11 04:01 PM
1

You use a linked article to the Discovery Institute which is advocate of Intelligent Design. Added to this is, the article originates as a review for a Catholic sourced review for a book on Darwin. I maintain the question of what relevance does this actually hold for Men's Rights? You are only enhancing resistance to the movement by maintaining false premises as justification to joining the cause. For you to read and consider (please leave your biases at the door): 1 and for direct reference to …
/r/MensRights28/04/11 03:49 PM
1

The reality is that because young men are rarer, they're more valued applicants. Today, two-thirds of colleges and universities report that they get more female than male applicants, and more than 56 percent of undergraduates nationwide are women. Demographers predict that by 2009, only 42 percent of all baccalaureate degrees awarded in the United States will be given to men. There was once a time in which a woman was close to certain of obtaining a post with such achievement - WOMEN ONLY colleg…
/r/MensRights28/04/11 02:46 AM
1

This is a ray of hope.. I agree with DBi, 5-10years is much too long. Awareness might greatly assist this process.
/r/MensRights28/04/11 02:32 AM
1

I'm not aware of TSA operations and limitations. I can only make an assumption on the matter based on it being the security agency which would be the first-line for notifying Customs.
/r/MensRights28/04/11 02:09 AM
2

Darwin was a Eugenicist himself...which really isn't all that surprising. So was Adolf Hitler Nope, out. Francis Galton was the proponent of eugenics. I thought there was a viable article going until this came up.. Sorry, but as far as propoganda goes there are holes in this the size of Saturn and it is appealing to the general principles to gain support and slipping in distortions. It is a hot subject, but personal biases are being banded about and discrediting the movement based on irrelevance…
/r/MensRights28/04/11 02:02 AM
1

Suspicious amounts of money in transit, counter-laundering perhaps?
/r/MensRights28/04/11 01:32 AM
1

DNA tests on admission please.. Its a simple procedure and can generate an entire job sector. Really would be good to see happen. Its magnitudes worse than benefit fraud and on those grounds alone could be contested in courts without being a direct attack on feminist policy - which would be met with great fury.
/r/MensRights28/04/11 01:27 AM
1

Cute story.. Shame about the undergrad overconfidence in the comments.
/r/MensRights28/04/11 01:23 AM
2

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rRSnlIExWpc A personal lol favourite: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WU-hrxnTId4
/r/MensRights28/04/11 12:48 AM
5

To any non-UK residents. Here is the advert.. Nothing big, certainly not as big as Labour make it out to be: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KdO4epI7oyg This is actually rather common, and the response was unjustified. Party rivalries play more in this than anything. The sexism claim is imbecilic.
/r/MensRights28/04/11 12:46 AM
1

Only on the feminist critique. Other aspects are dubious.
/r/MensRights26/04/11 06:28 PM
2

Aye, she is impressive. EDIT: Not in all respects though.
/r/MensRights26/04/11 05:43 PM
1

To encourage a behavior that we think will benefit society! You can disagree that greater gender-balance across the various professions leads to a more egalitarian society, but since I DO think that it does, naturally I'm in favor of working towards that outcome. And I am pointing out to you the pitfalls of what happens once that situation comes about. For all the differences of our points upto this point, my perspective is from a system that has gone further toward your proposed goals. They don…
/r/MensRights26/04/11 04:11 PM
1

Unless the ambiguity of the sentence was due to the possibility of placing the subject on 'point' when that would have been the object in relation to the subject of 'man' being you. Also the use of the ellipsis to extend the sentence with out implying a direct relation to you but leaving it ambiguously hanging there. I see there were numerous problems with my sentence... now.
/r/MensRights26/04/11 11:32 AM
1

I was referring to my premise for posting to OneY. Why do you assume I was talking about your opinion? Was I that unclear?
/r/MensRights26/04/11 10:32 AM
-1

Oh gentlemen, I am truly enjoying this circlejerk.. That don't make me gay does it?
/r/MensRights26/04/11 10:07 AM
1

But when it comes to incentivizing entry into certain fields through scholarships etc., I think the opportunity costs are definitely worth it. Incentive schemes are there for what reason? Ask yourself that. In general, scholarships aim to attain the best of a particular subset of students. They do provide opportunity, but at what cost? Generally the quotas are presented to enhance representation of that subset at the cost of giving a chance for those who excel in one area but wish to attain a ch…
/r/MensRights25/04/11 09:20 PM
1

Well I was thinking in terms of IRL reprisals.. Your integrity is safe, the integrity of men here in the UK may be lesser so (even further than present).
/r/MensRights25/04/11 08:03 PM
3

Cue reprisals from the numerous voices claiming men have too many voices in parliament.. i.e. there are more male sex politicians than female. Its a major issue here that if anyone raises that the men in power do not by default speak for men's issues you get shot down. There is a major misconception that is continually profligated that men in politics concern themselves with their "gender". They don't. It doesn't even factor in. Women in parliament (c.f. Harriet Harmann) are the ones who make a …
/r/MensRights25/04/11 07:37 PM
1

I get your point man.. Its kind of naive. Still, worth a shot. Even in passing.
/r/MensRights25/04/11 06:49 PM
2

And also of sexists, misogynists, horndogs, militarists, straight people, politicians, consumers of pornography, consumers of “beauty,” racists, godbags, liberal men, Hollywoodists, homophobes, matrimonialists, and other cogs in the megatheocorporatocratic machine. Tourette's syndrome anyone?
/r/MensRights25/04/11 06:57 AM
2

lol, you thought I was pissed. Hmm.. Taking it with a grain-of-salt is easy you know. Like I said, I have shit troll-detection but still, you are a bit ... eccentric in that writing style of yours. So, I have no reason to merit anything you say as being nothing but thetrollking. No offense man, and I do appreciate the contributions you make to this group. Whatever your intentions.
/r/MensRights25/04/11 06:03 AM
5

Post comics to OneY.. That's my recommendation. Reason: They may appreciate the levity at face-value. However, if they get into a position to view it critically, have it as an xpost/r/MensRights..
/r/MensRights25/04/11 12:33 AM
1

Oh u.. Is that how things work now.. mass delete
/r/MensRights25/04/11 12:28 AM
1

Well, I am not Cliffor. I could link to her pic of herself and then post a pic of my cock or something but that still won't prove shit....I don't even know if cliffor is actually a female but I think she is. You happen to have a picture of your face? You're probably proud of your cock and all that but all the men here have one, so we know what a penis looks like, and it doesn't look like a face. Downstream in this thread there is a small fight between a few posters who got into it over me postin…
/r/MensRights25/04/11 12:24 AM
2

You comment well, but I asked a question out of curiosity and had previously stated I have shit troll-detection.. I was mailed by Cliffor and was met with more tripe: proof.
/r/MensRights24/04/11 10:12 PM
1

Fuck you are right.. What the hell..
/r/MensRights24/04/11 09:08 PM
2

Where were the women coming to her aid? I would like to make a distinction here between a white knight and a gaurd. A white knight goes into such a situation with the aim of satisfying themselves and their presumptions. Whether those presumptions include an ego affirmation of them being a man or whatever. If there were women there too, I would expect them to be as willing to defend that person.
/r/MensRights24/04/11 08:49 PM
1

I would wonder if the value judgements of "right" and "safe" would correspond with the dissociation of the action with the consequences.
/r/MensRights24/04/11 08:20 PM
1

Troubling situation there. Because no single person amongst all of ye could really tell if this was really her need for attention.. Yet, no one took the alternate route either. That which took the time to give her attention, but not necessarily for the intents or purposes of supporting her emotions either. For example, for someone to allow her to have her say and let her say her piece, and then just tell her your perspective and ask her to consider counterpoints of her perceptions of the causes.…
/r/MensRights24/04/11 07:56 PM
1

Because I think you may be vastly overestimating 1) the existence of actual gender-based quotas in modern corporations I am not American, but I will introduce you to European propositions which are intended for introduction. For purposes here I will draw your attention to the following background provided in the article. No governor of a European central bank is female, for example. Gender equality is also far from being a reality in the political field. In Europe, only 24% of members of nationa…
/r/MensRights24/04/11 07:21 PM
1

Ah, now I've got your meaning.. Good points.
/r/MensRights24/04/11 06:50 PM
1

They can bite my pasty Irish ass.. J/K.. I really admire the economic and social climate (of which I am aware) of Denmark, I have often considered it as an option. However, what fails me in accepting Denmark as the place of happy-times that I fantasise it to be, is the very point that conflict is avoided. It isn't that violence avoidance is bad, but it is hard to register dissatisfaction in such an environment without some accusation of petulance or shrillness. It is quite good I am sure at sile…
/r/MensRights24/04/11 06:39 PM
1

I understand expressly what religion is in this country, and how it differs from how the custom is approached in the UK, for example. I think you also underestimate the influence of religion in the UK..
/r/MensRights24/04/11 06:29 PM
1

Oh boy. People will complain about anything.. There are women who believe that men should be held responsible for the failure of barrier devices like condoms, even if used in tandom with women's contraception such as the pill or contragestive measures. Not that I claim that this is the majority, but there will be detractors regardless.. Which is a farce really considering the only contraceptive measures to men are inherently of greater risk. For the sake of additional perspective consult this: h…
/r/MensRights24/04/11 05:25 PM
0

I know.. But that won't stop complaints will it?
/r/MensRights24/04/11 05:14 PM
0

Not so much a sensible assessment of the prefeminist era, when the attitudes about proper gender roles were enshrined into LAW. An equal assertion could have been made in prefeminist era for men. In fact prefeminist laws still echo today in terms of men. I never said it did. Formal social equality is a better deal for everybody. You may not have said it, but it was heavily implied. ("And this is leaving out the fact that most women didn't get the "safety" (gag, retch) of staying in the domestic …
/r/MensRights24/04/11 05:07 PM
0

Paid work is hard... but that doesn't mean it was a privilege to not be able to offer your services for pay in the labor of your choice. I do agree, but that is not oppression either for the people who aim to achieve such not doing so in matching amounts. An advantage in a field does not make someone an oppressor of the disadvantaged, it makes them better competitors in that field. A universal reduction by another class of competitors with the intents and purposes of reducing competition would b…
/r/MensRights24/04/11 04:12 PM
2

Good use of Jungian analogy, strong points, most notably the segment on domination and the weakness of the animal-brain. The expansion therein about the domination of the masculine is a good read.. I won't give any opinions here, but it is interesting to read. Thanks.
/r/MensRights24/04/11 05:08 AM
1

I saw this before, and I really did like his clarity on the topic. Its videos like this that can call men to really look at the issues they face. Upvote.
/r/MensRights24/04/11 04:39 AM
1

Still not answering the question.. When you want to answer and stop trolling, I'll be here.
/r/MensRights24/04/11 04:26 AM
2

Now you are being a petty pedant and asserting truth.. This is not the issue at hand I would like to remind you of that. So I made a lexical error, that was retracted for the purpose of avoiding these circumstances. So if you want to play the proponent of truth, give reasoning for your knee-jerk shaming tactic excuse for a response to my initial comment. Edit Note: I asked a question.
/r/MensRights24/04/11 04:15 AM
0

You turned petty fast, comment redacted for this purpose.
/r/MensRights24/04/11 03:55 AM
2

3 pints of milk please.. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QI0RiqK3XJc
/r/MensRights24/04/11 03:41 AM
1

Yeah I guess, but I have shit troll-detection. I actually kinda like trolls. They keep me on my toes.
/r/MensRights24/04/11 01:38 AM
0

Oh I do hope they operate the testing thoroughly on this one.. Make it reasonably safe and to high standards. This would be excellent to see. It would certainly be interesting to see it work. I wonder if there would be complaints about its one shot in, one shot out treatment. That might echo: "Oh its unfair, women should have this too"
/r/MensRights24/04/11 01:35 AM
3

Is trollking a sockpuppet?
/r/MensRights24/04/11 01:28 AM
1

I might also add the angryharry motion for the men-who-sit-at-screens motivation. At the end of it, we may stand at separate places on our own but this can cause us hassle. Standing separate works until the pressure pushes mobs. This is why there should be some action in place to allow for counter-force in a flash mob setting. That way no matter what, the individuals can dissent with each other but disseminate by volition when the issues are raised.
/r/MensRights24/04/11 01:17 AM
2

Lol, sometimes you are bang on.. Sometimes your name meets the mark.
/r/MensRights24/04/11 12:48 AM
1

I said what I said not for the maligned in the place, but the one's who maybe go there for the lawlz who can think for themselves. If I got through to one person there, I don't care what the others think. As a note, testing something I say gives it a chance to be challanged. For science!
/r/MensRights24/04/11 12:46 AM
3

That is the type of women I want a family with.. No shit, no fuss. Upvote!
/r/MensRights24/04/11 12:21 AM
2

lol..
/r/MensRights23/04/11 11:42 PM
1

Interesting how she makes the claim that women think other women are stupid.. I did not see this as realistic, but if it is true, fucking-hell.. That shows a base expectation of inferiority in anyone outside of themselves. I won't go and assume this is true, but that kind of attitude really makes me do a double-take and wonder, what is lacking if the basic idea of human dignity is not present? Really what can be contributing so greatly to that idea?
/r/MensRights23/04/11 11:33 PM
1

Downvoted.. Eugenics, really is not a legal obligation in terms of men's rights. This removes the right's of men to their children more than increases them. So, No.
/r/MensRights23/04/11 10:52 PM
1

Well said.. Great link.
/r/MensRights23/04/11 03:17 AM
3

If they want abortion, give us the right to refuse custody. Your choice to abort, our choice to abort. Anyone can give abortion a bad rap, but it is an issue that relationships which do not want a child at the time (or cannot afford it) should have that choice. Likewise men who do not want a child at the time should not be forced to raise one. Is Cliffor a troll? I like the diversions.. Gives me something to think about.
/r/MensRights23/04/11 02:32 AM
4

lol, I just posted something like this to OneY.. I think these men are the one's who would gladly stab someone looking for men's rights in the back if they got the chance at pussy or approval. The sheer instability is harsh. That being said, I would say I was a white knight, but after time, you learn that people need to be there to help themselves, because no-one else is responsible for you. I guess what I am saying is that it is self-victimisation that needs ousting for issues to be addressed.
/r/MensRights23/04/11 02:23 AM
1

I have made some points. It is not in my interests to challenge feminists there but I have tried some basic abstractions to clarify my views on the matters at hand. Quite frankly, it appears to not be a great place to discuss much. Some of the primary concerns I had were issues with confusion between gender identity and sex, along with politics being discouraged under the title of "issues". As far as I am concerned, if you place a point on issues you are talking politics, otherwise you are looki…
/r/MensRights23/04/11 01:48 AM
2

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tTOQhPd2Xh4 Edit: Although I am willing to address the issue, I believe it is not in the best interest of equality to support the influence of a government which bases itself on the majority rule of a partisan group. This is a cop-out. It would rather be in the interests of establishing a line of order in which issues which matter to a majority are directly translated to institutions which are responsible for them. At present the system uses "think tanks" to best a…
/r/MensRights22/04/11 11:40 PM
2

Google: "Jeremy Kyle"
/r/MensRights22/04/11 11:30 PM
5

Even in death, if a job is getting done it is done with singular focus.
/r/MensRights22/04/11 10:14 PM
1

See also: Conformity
/r/MensRights21/04/11 01:22 AM
1

*reservations
/r/MensRights21/04/11 01:20 AM
2

Forever postponed.
/r/MensRights20/04/11 08:58 PM
3

Thanks for this.. Information is a valuable commodity that seems to be devalued in an ideological climate.
/r/MensRights20/04/11 07:41 PM
12

I had a similar real-life debate with a woman that had been in class with me.. She never stated where she had sourced her information, but her logic was similar. When I discussed the factors which influence conscientious pay differentiation the only response I received was: "Unfortunately you don't understand the issue".. Kudos for actively engaging the problems. One more thing: She already told you the facts AND they are from her books. What books? Damn she never said, so those "facts" are what…
/r/MensRights20/04/11 07:15 PM
2

nanomagnetic wasn't really, but then again, this is a link to a Harvard page. What was Harvard associated with? Lawrence Summers.. Forced to apologise for making the claim that men are better at math than women.
/r/MensRights19/04/11 08:23 AM
0

But isn't it pathetic that our society is such that I standout enough to be recognized and thanked for being fair? Excuse me? I do not conflate your good deeds with you being a special case. I thanked you for being a good person for just that, BEING a good person. I know little about your other undertakings but commend you in this regard. I am an outcast to other women because when they see the way I have done things and how successful and happy the result it reflects back to them the fault with…
/r/MensRights19/04/11 07:35 AM
2

That is a rather interest perspective that I have often considered. In light of this I partly concur, but I would first ask for a clarification on your connection with regard to driving schools and department of transport. The point that underlies this issue remains that the purchase of this mill-diplomas are a clear transfer of credibility from due participation in training for the sole purposes of bypassing meritted achievement for the ends of unjustified recognition of having expertise in som…
/r/MensRights19/04/11 07:00 AM
2

People's beliefs remain their private affairs, concur on that one. However, this is the same condition that afflicts the use of political ideology as a justification for the imposition of right violating laws and policies. It is on these grounds that I object whole-heartedly to the abuse of authoritative position for the purposes of maintaining their cognitive dissonance against the facts of the reality in which every single person exists.
/r/MensRights19/04/11 06:07 AM
3

Cons: Glorified white-knight syndrome. The sheer treatment of this issue as a fashion trend is counter-productive. Pros: Creates a non-threatening "gate-way" to reassessing the absurdity of gender-neutralisation in contemporary society.
/r/MensRights19/04/11 05:10 AM
5

Its a shame when people do not accept that reality does not comply with what we believe, but rather is what it is. Views that are used and reiterated en-masse give the illusion of concession, but it remains that reality does not give a fuck.
/r/MensRights19/04/11 05:00 AM
6

The close-up on his mouth as he said "Chances are women want to be groped" sent a shudder down my spine, so aye creepy.. Still, apartheid rules on trains? WTF! How did it get to that stage?
/r/MensRights19/04/11 01:58 AM
1

I am interested in seeing how this plays out. The child who made the call is worthy of great support and commendation. (Of course I am stating all the children, in case anyone thinks I am thinking otherwise)
/r/MensRights19/04/11 01:35 AM
0

History channel 2030: How Cosmopolitan bought and sold the world.
/r/MensRights19/04/11 01:17 AM
1

Thanks for the information. I don't really know how alimony works specifically in court, and I don't know if its fair. I was simply trying to point out to OP that alimony isn't always evil, unfair, or a violation of rights. If you do not know, perhaps you could research it? It would be a start. As for what I said being viewed as "information", consider this: If it is information, what logic is there in the information? That is more important than what I say here, does the logic of it comply with…
/r/MensRights18/04/11 10:51 PM
1

Perhaps you could watch this: The myth of women's oppression
/r/MensRights18/04/11 10:24 PM
1

I honestly had no idea that women thought that way, because men tend to actively pursue knowledge of female anatomy I concur with Alanna in this regard, that is not a universal principle. I do however think that men do have a tendency to take a technical approach to sexual matters. Maybe not as a discursive exercise, but rather a strategy. I can only speak for myself here, but I remember taking an affirmatively technical approach to learning anatomy for the focus of optimising pleasure during se…
/r/MensRights18/04/11 08:59 PM
1

That is a rather loaded and dubious question. Could you possibly break it down into syllogistic form questions please?
/r/MensRights18/04/11 08:19 PM
1

You may wish to consider that the man's options traditionally do not include taking care of the child. The laws regarding "best interest of the child" are a complex factor involved in these proceedings also. When the issue is raised, the term "primary care-giver" may be issued as justification for alimony. This character is given a default position of the woman, which entails that the woman is not only provided the status of default carer but is also expected to sacrifice her future as a worker.…
/r/MensRights18/04/11 07:57 PM
1

A unicorn? What you just described is a conscientious and fair form of process.. It's what should be the case for most divorces but is not the case. Thank You for being a good person.
/r/MensRights18/04/11 04:47 PM
1

Nearly $10,000 total.
/r/MensRights18/04/11 12:14 AM
2

What is the average term for judicial process in CA? An interesting model to patch that one up could be to make the marriage contract optional.. i.e. Making contracts for the term of about 7 years. If you want to continue being married after that - then revise the contract. Allows for some leighway.
/r/MensRights18/04/11 12:13 AM
2

It might not have been on the charges list for this case.. It would be interesting if the state decided to follow this up.
/r/MensRights18/04/11 12:09 AM
1

It was an absurd retort to the assuming premise. I was being facetious. Nonetheless, their logic remains flawed. You are correct. I like Guinness by the way, and I happen to be Irish.
/r/MensRights18/04/11 12:07 AM
1

I laughed my ass off at this.. The logic is incredibly flawed. It is about not endorsing child sex slavery. i.e. If you don't but a child sex slave you are a "Real man".. Wow, that means boys, men, girls and women are all "REAL MEN".. Forget the idea of it being about prostitution.
/r/MensRights17/04/11 06:48 PM
1

Another point.. The higher the risk, the higher likelihood of injury. If there is a higher likelihood of injury there is a higher probability of incapacitation of the worker and even mortality. So using your waitress/construction worker comparison - the waitress is in a lower risk position and aside from earning less for doing a job that does not require a standard she is not as requisite for potential risk. There are other arguments in place that are considered more politically and ideologicall…
/r/MensRights17/04/11 06:06 PM
1

Or even "Caught out there" By Kelis.. A classic example of the open-aggressive motto.
/r/MensRights17/04/11 05:55 PM
9

The intrinsic sociopathic flaw of victim-dependence logic in the law.. It is bad enough that the man is still being called to pay her $400 a month ($9600). But fuck it, he can just give her that out of the wallop of cash he gets from the house sale profits.. Not that he really should though.
/r/MensRights17/04/11 05:20 PM
1

I whole-heartedly agree.. And it is a major right on par with "the right to choose".. I agree a woman has the right to choose abortion. I agree a man has the right to confirm paternity. If a woman chooses to abort a child that could cause her suffering and limit her freedom- I concur. If a man chooses to not raise a child that is not his that could cause him suffering and limit his freedom - I concur. Inversely: A woman who chooses to abort a child without the father's consent should provide due…
/r/MensRights17/04/11 01:38 PM
1

Fair enough, maybe if any Americans here could provide info.
/r/MensRights17/04/11 01:09 PM
2

I'm curious. In the UK, a revision of the examination system has been undertaken several times to "re-assess" the difficulty level of content. This was a complex kettle of fish because it involved attempts to make schools appear more successful. That is partly because of a rather concocted school system of boards and figures. Anyway, the system aimed to simplify "male-dominated fields" for ease of access for women. Is there a similar system put in place in America? Has the education system been …
/r/MensRights17/04/11 12:24 PM
2

http://www.mankind.org.uk/factsmalevicitms.html In case their are UK Redditors in here looking for comparatives. And for regional organisations: http://www.mankind.org.uk/otherorganisations.html (which includes a link to ADAM for homosexual abuse victims support)
/r/MensRights17/04/11 12:12 PM
2

As little as this means in lieu of your more pragmatic concerns, you are fucking aces man. Although its a might admirable what you are doing for your wife man, it is also a might unfair. If you were a parent, and that was your child who had not had an equal time to support their funding, I could understand. That is the thing about college, it can be understood when people fund their own admissions for their own reasons, but when it is retracted as an adultm it only further emphasises an expectat…
/r/MensRights17/04/11 12:09 PM
3

I give this article a cringe factor of 7/10. Banding about off the cuff statistics is one thing, but actually not seeing the irony and bias in what they are writing is another.. I really would like to assume this to be a misrepresentation, but it is evidential that this is too commonplace. One thing I am curious about is: If women feel that in this situation they are being pressured into doing something (as they claim) to "lock it down", then what about the following implications. Firstly, they …
/r/MensRights17/04/11 11:57 AM
1

Last paragraph fixed. Statistics can be used to influence people en masse. They can also be used to manipulate them similarly. Lots of people are ignorant about statistics and their limitations, which makes such manipulation easier. That is, I am sorry to say, a feminized revision. I was saying something with plenty elaboration here. The fact that I used a personal reflection on maths is one thing. But when I said an insufficient training in the requirements of science I mean much more: Science …
/r/MensRights17/04/11 12:47 AM
1

wow I hope my mental pressure to write this doesn't make it seem incomprehensible/incoherent drivel.
/r/MensRights16/04/11 10:09 AM
1

Why is it the social sciences are the ones that manage to make academics look awful in general? I guess it would make a point to mention that I myself had previously been studying Psychology. If there is any criticism I would believe I have for it, and in an extension other SS subjects, it is this; The range of subjects is more readily accessible, and counter-intuitively, some of the aspects are more difficult than many assume. Not intrinsically though, but rather difficult in regard to those wh…
/r/MensRights16/04/11 09:55 AM
1

I was horrified at first by the video contents.. In particular that this is considered acceptable. But I was livid when I saw the contrast of commenting: that a blatantly abusive (beyond mere intrusive) methodology was reflected upon as creepy, whilst a simple mention of one potential use for a piece of technology was pounced upon as denigrating of rights.. Aye, it was, but it did not infer repeated abuses and the assumption of guilt. So I do appreciate that you can see the error here, but it is…
/r/MensRights16/04/11 07:39 AM
3

Absurd, isn't it?
/r/MensRights16/04/11 01:32 AM
2

I know, I'm kinda raging right now.
/r/MensRights16/04/11 01:28 AM
3

I don't really care what they call it or perceive it to be, that is abuse!
/r/MensRights16/04/11 01:15 AM
2

I've mentioned it on here: http://www.reddit.com/r/fffffffuuuuuuuuuuuu/comments/golg1/the_joys_of_being_a_single_dad_thank_you/c1p4wsz?context=3 It wasn't the best place to mention it, but the topic arose and I felt it was right to be able to empathise with those who mentioned what happened to them.
/r/MensRights16/04/11 12:02 AM
2

Not, unfortunately, that it doesn't happen, but that it's not reported, not talked about, not portrayed in fiction, film, or TV, and just generally not taken seriously. Very much the issue here.. And another element of this comes into the fact that part of the problem in getting this issue covered in the past (and unfortunately still today) is that misconceptions regarding male physiological arousal AND propensity for victimisation are considered an unimportant (if not inconceivable) issue. It i…
/r/MensRights15/04/11 10:12 PM
3

Now with that much more ellaboration, I can sympathise. I'm 24 by the way, and I am a bit of a pedant sometimes when it comes to these things. But like I did there, even (if not especially) with more experience comes more responsibility for people to be as clear as possible with what faults, alternatives, expansions, inferential/deductive methods, comparisons, contrast, interpolations etc. that their experience has thought them. Also, tl;dr is one such bane of such a process. As though you need …
/r/MensRights15/04/11 08:37 PM
2

Idiot can also mean a person who acts in a self-defeating manner. That is how I used the term.. So yeah, information and support is good. However, it did not change the fact the person's view was self-defeating. BTW: People under 25? Arbitrary number there ascribed to personal experience. Are you willing to learn of people under 25 not having stupid ideas? :) Just playing, but it is a bit arbitrary to ascribe that age limit to the merit of someone's ideas. Kinda makes a person feel dumb for want…
/r/MensRights15/04/11 07:54 PM
0

Indeed. Not every person goes out there with sufficient physiological knowledge. But one of the problems here is assuming that only one sex is capable of rape. That is a greater limitation of understanding.. When someone makes a statement to such a tune, they ARE being an idiot. A self-defeating idiot.
/r/MensRights15/04/11 06:21 PM
4

Ok, I'm pretty new, so hi everyone! This may seem rather simplistic and limited, but how about we establish that addressing inequalities and distortions of men is the primary aims? Perhaps I am wrong, but if there are inequalities, and we are essentially a subset of egalitarianism why distort it? That is what I often see as the major failing of feminism, that the title was altered to monopolise the principles of equality from the activist post. [Edit] Comments, criticism, clarification requests …
/r/MensRights15/04/11 11:01 AM
1

2X Good, One X bad!!!
/r/MensRights15/04/11 08:53 AM
1

Well said.
/r/MensRights14/04/11 08:58 PM
1

Thanks for the link.. I read the one on: "On average, I am taught to fear walking alone after dark in average public spaces much less than my female counterparts are." And instantly had to make a double-take.. Exactly WHO is doing the teaching on this one?
/r/MensRights14/04/11 08:12 PM
1

OR that between lower rates of males reporting sexual, physical and psychological abuse and the leniency of legislation against female rapists (often dismissed or construed as 'lesser' sexual assault): The reliability of claiming that one sex is more frequently raped is solely based on reported and noted cases. Even at a foundational level, women are more communicative of these rights infringements than men are, hence the birth of communities such as MR - to allow these men to actually have a su…
/r/MensRights14/04/11 08:00 PM
1

That link (and the whole documentary) was rather disturbing. I am glad I saw it though. Thanks rogosk. Evin Rubar gets much praise from me.
/r/MensRights14/04/11 06:00 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter