| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | You can see women as equals and do wellI fully agree with this definition. Now, instead of dealing in static definitions, let's examine how context alters meaning. If I tell a friend of mine, who I know very well, that I hate them, it could be taken as a joke. If I said that same thing to someone I had just met, they'd probably take it more literally. I don't say this to insult your intelligence, just developing the main idea. Rating someone 1-10 is not inherently misogynistic. I perhaps misspoke with that. However, context is import… | /r/seduction | 21/06/26 07:13 PM |
| 1 | You can see women as equals and do wellFor one because there's no evidence that 'biologically primed desire' even exists. On the contrary, there is more evidence suggesting women are dynamic and have a range of wants and desires, just like men do. Patriarchy is literally the centering of men over women, a power structure that inherently deems them superior. This, having been the dominant power structure in almost every society in human history, has shaped gender dynamics. It's all social, and dictated by our social setting. Do you th… | /r/seduction | 21/06/26 07:00 PM |
| 1 | You can see women as equals and do wellGotcha. That being said, it's still a generalization. I have met as many women who were into degrees of control as I have degrees of helplessness. Sexual leans are generally disconnected from other facets of your personality (generally, there are many exceptions, but this is between both sexes). I've met incredibly meek women who turned out to very much enjoy telling their male partners what to do when it came down to it. The idea that women like being led is an idea that is rooted in misogyny a… | /r/seduction | 21/06/26 05:43 PM |
| 1 | You can see women as equals and do wellThose words mean the same thing. They both literally mean that you are ignoring evidence to make a biased argument. Not making fun of you, language is a struggle, just letting you know. | /r/seduction | 21/06/26 05:27 PM |
| 1 | You can see women as equals and do wellThe concept is inherently demeaning. Look at how the guy you responded to used it. If your girl is a 2 you don't know anything about relationships. The scale applies a numeric value to people that breaks down their worth to just attractiveness. Your girl is a 2 versus your girl has a 2 in attractiveness or something. She is a 2, that's all she is, is the implication. Especially since that would, somehow, dictate your own knowledge on relationships. For the record you're very sane compared to, li… | /r/seduction | 21/06/26 05:24 PM |
| 1 | You can see women as equals and do wellThat's not what that word means | /r/seduction | 21/06/26 05:14 PM |
| 1 | You can see women as equals and do wellIt's a little bit weird to be talking about misogyny and still go along with the stupid 1-10 attractiveness rating scale. | /r/seduction | 21/06/26 05:08 PM |
| 1 | You can see women as equals and do wellSexually dominant women do not exist, got it | /r/seduction | 21/06/26 05:06 PM |
| 2 | You can see women as equals and do wellWhat the fuck is wrong with you 😭 | /r/seduction | 21/06/26 04:57 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter