TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

YeOldeVertiformCity Archive

View 0 posts and 16 comments by YeOldeVertiformCity on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

People need to start being a lot more skeptical. The hijab cutting story (that an Asian man with a moustache took out a pair of scissors and tried to cut off a girl’s hijab) made it all the way to a statement coming from the leader of the county... you know... old “I Love Blackface” Justin Trudeau.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/09/19 10:57 PM
-2

Why are people upvoting this. This is horrific.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/09/19 08:44 PM
3

This makes it seem like “diverse” is (to borrow a phrase I don’t like) a “dog whistle” of sorts. It would be illegal to specify a particular gender or race: “I am looking for a Asian male intern” etc. But you can say that you want to consider a “more diverse” pool of candidates. Or say you want to “increase diversity” on the team in order to illegally favour a particular identity group.
/r/MensRights16/08/19 04:59 PM
8

Similar to how boys now do worse than girls in school... but they aren’t reversing the initiatives that helped girls get ahead in order to achieve parity. Instead they are focusing on the few rare places where girls still do worse and act like that is evidence of wholesale discrimination across the board. The most blatant evidence of this is the UN report on gender discrimination where they rank countries based on gender discrimination: “perfect equality” or “massive advantages for women” are bo…
/r/MensRights16/08/19 04:47 PM
11

The women’s team isn’t better. It’s just doing better relative to other women’s teams. That isn’t the same. It’s like saying that an undefeated minor league team should make more than a mediocre major league team. That isn’t how it works.
/r/MensRights31/07/19 07:06 PM
0

Is this real? These screenshot headlines are easy to fake.
/r/MensRights22/07/19 12:04 AM
1

I’ve seen it widely claimed that this is a fake screenshot. I don’t think it’s fair to make broad claims based on what seems to be very dubious evidence.
/r/MensRights12/03/19 03:15 PM
2

Oh. Simple. This post isn’t criticizing the movies. It’s criticizing the discussions surrounding the movies. So Captain Marvel might be amazing. It might be terrible. It doesn’t matter for the post. The point is that people talk about these movies as if its quality doesn’t matter.
/r/MensRights05/03/19 11:44 PM
3

I think that someone should need to be a prominent member of a group in order to actually attribute their opinion to the group. If a prominent academic said this then maybe we would be on to something, but this post is just a (possibly fake) screenshot of a tweet from a nobody. This is just outrage porn. Plain and simple.
/r/MensRights22/02/19 06:04 PM
2

This identity politics strategy is going to earn you 4 more years of republicans...
/r/MensRights20/02/19 02:28 PM
2

I think that I am logically consistent in my reaction to the Gillette ad. 1) I personally didn’t like it. That is something that I use when I make my own decisions about how I spend my money. So if I see an ad for something that doesn’t appeal to me then I don’t buy it. This doesn’t mean that I get upset and try to deny others from spending money on it. 2) If something that I used to like changes into something that I don’t like then I will explain why I don’t like it any more in the hope it wil…
/r/MensRights14/02/19 06:18 PM
2

You don’t have to argue with me. You’re preaching to the choir.
/r/MensRights13/02/19 08:28 PM
7

Superficially, it’s a story about straight white teenage boys who want to buy alcohol for girls so they’ll get drunk and have sex with them. That isn’t what the movie is about, really. But a very superficial reading of the story would be this in order to characterize it as problematic. Superbad was actually a takedown of what these people would characterize as “toxic”. But it is an old-fashioned takedown; to use a new term I just learned, it is “90s feminist”... meaning that it is progressive by…
/r/MensRights13/02/19 07:43 PM
11

It’s a new attitude towards film - you aren’t allowed to show certain bad things even if the movie acknowledges that it is bad. So you can’t show bullying even if the movie is about the bullying being bad. Or showing that the bullies learn their lesson. So if you’re getting bullied, you will no longer have a hero that is bullied to relate to. Example: 2018 reaction to “problematic” classic Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer movie. So it doesn’t matter what the actual underlying message of Superbad i…
/r/MensRights13/02/19 07:18 PM
1

Brilliant. Yes. Agreed. This post is textbook, “win a battle; lost the war”.
/r/MensRights10/02/19 07:31 PM
1

I patiently await evidence. People can say anything on the internet in an uncited text post.
/r/MensRights10/01/19 07:47 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter