TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Yeazelicious Archive

View 0 posts and 21 comments by Yeazelicious on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

People who use DuckDuckGo, for starters. DuckDuckGo uses Yahoo! and Bing's repositories, IIRC.
/r/MensRights07/05/18 08:59 PM
3

Haha. It's all good. And that study is pretty interesting. While I don't have the time to go through all of it, the gist of it I'm seeing is that, in three classes for one quarter in biology at the University of Washington, men were consistently nominated over women by their peers for being knowledgeable about the course content (apparently not the most knowledgeable, but just knowledgeable; not sure how the wording of the question went). There do appear to be some ambiguous factors, like the "o…
/r/MensRights16/04/18 12:13 AM
2

I... I think you accidentally dropped a link to a roleplaying subreddit. Is there something I'm overlooking here?
/r/MensRights15/04/18 11:06 PM
3

You've given me almost no evidence that's the case. Literally the only thing you've given me is that you used to teach nursing (basically not STEM as far as I'm concerned; the BLS is one of the few organizations that will actually call it as such) and that from your observations, female nursing students are more competent than male nursing students. Not only does that have nothing to do with STEM at large (because you can just extrapolate every other vastly different field from one with anecdota…
/r/MensRights15/04/18 10:57 PM
3

Wait, full stop. This is so overwhelmingly sexist that I'm actually kind of taken aback. Not only do you only present anecdotal evidence for this, not only is this anecdotal evidence for a field that's only debatably STEM, but you want to go ahead and extrapolate that anecdotal evidence to the entirety of STEM to claim that women are "much more competent" than men in STEM fields. I think I need to lie down.
/r/MensRights15/04/18 10:44 PM
5

I'm not taking a side here (i.e. it definitively is one way or another), but your counterpoint to a peer-reviewed study whose results were replicated 5 of 5 times is a blog post that has no mention of the methodology, offhandedly dismisses their results by saying "But other studies have shown otherwise" without bringing up a single one, and then has like half of the blog post dedicated to a single anecdote about her friend. All of this, by the way, written by someone who specializes in philosoph…
/r/MensRights15/04/18 09:17 PM
3

I should note that I don't believe anyone's information should be put in public like that until they're proven guilty at a trial, no matter who, no matter what the charges, and no matter how it seems. Sure, in this case she's pretty evidently guilty and I really don't feel all that bad for her. But in some cases? Just being charged can ruin your life.
/r/MensRights14/03/18 02:42 AM
7

If you don't trust the person enough to get married without a prenuptual, then don't get married I thoroughly disagree with this line of reasoning. I would always, without exception, get one. Probability is not on your side and people do change after years and years, both you and them. I don't care how much I love them with all my heart; those two statements remain true. There's no real harm in doing it and if they understand anything about basic statistics and how they're likely not special eno…
/r/MensRights12/03/18 05:45 AM
1

Standard issue.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/12/17 07:52 PM
3

The word they're actually looking for is 'battery'.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/12/17 07:50 PM
2

But here's the flaw in what you're saying: I never said that their argument is inherently wrong. I never said that what they said shouldn't be considered. I said that what they say should be taken with "a massive grain of salt", as it should be.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/10/17 04:06 PM
2

Making a factual statement about the academic credibility of the source is not an ad hominem attack; at the very least it's not a fallacious one. I'm not stating that PragerU is always wrong because they're Christian or because they're creationist or because they're PragerU; I'm stating that they have a long history of distorting or fabricating the truth to fit their agenda and are, therefore, an unreliable source.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/10/17 03:18 PM
2

Yup. I take any data point PragerU touts with a massive grain of salt. A lot of the shit they put out, as /u/OniTan pointed out, is creationism and climate change denial.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/10/17 03:58 PM
2

http://i.imgur.com/VEi2kOk.jpg?1
/r/PussyPassDenied30/05/17 04:26 PM
2

http://i.imgur.com/VEi2kOk.jpg?1
/r/PussyPassDenied30/05/17 04:26 PM
1

http://i.imgur.com/VEi2kOk.jpg?1
/r/PussyPassDenied30/05/17 04:25 PM
2

http://i.imgur.com/VEi2kOk.jpg?1
/r/PussyPassDenied30/05/17 04:22 PM
2

http://i.imgur.com/VEi2kOk.jpg?1
/r/PussyPassDenied30/05/17 04:22 PM
11

Maybe she needed $5 to recoup the investment in her professional-grade microphone.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/05/17 04:04 PM
6

Aptly spoken, /u/I_RARELY_RAPE_PEOPLE. Aptly spoken.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/11/14 01:35 AM
18

There should be an exception for this in the law of the conservation of matter.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/11/14 11:32 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter