TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Yezdigerd Archive

View 0 posts and 54 comments by Yezdigerd on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

It's usually explained with women caring more about a social context for the actors/characters to get into the porn. Like for a man it's enough if she is visually hot. Women also want to establish that the dude has high status protector/provider qualites which the erotica sets up.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/25 10:17 AM
1

Right, the dude will be a part benificiary of many her economic decisions regarding his money. I never said he just gave her all the money. That men provide for women and give them stuff are something you don't recognize? All I said that once a woman has locked down a man who generate good money, It makes sense to drop the leftism since this stance now hurt her and her family economically. While previously she benefited from it.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/24 03:59 PM
1

Yes of course? In a relationship with a woman that love and appreciate them even happily. Women allocate some 80% of total purchasing decisions despite only producing a fraction of the wealth.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/24 12:47 PM
1

Self-interest? When a woman is alone or with useless men she access able men's wealth through the state and leftism. If she hitches to an able guy, she gets access to his resources directly and the state drains those at the expense of her and her children, so a conservative outlook serves her better.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/24 12:23 PM
8

It's more that a large dick suggested a slave to desire, lack of self control. (Satyrs and the wine god were depicted with those), these weren't virtuous masculine traits. The ideal man is in absolute control of his body and world as his unerect small dick suggests.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/23 05:37 PM
3

Harley wasn't even a true villain. Her appeal was the good girl infatuated with the bad boy that do almost anything to please him. The joker being a psychotic killer makes this sad as well as funny and very relatable still.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/23 09:29 PM
2

Nothing suggests human are naturally monogamous, species with strong sexual dimorhpism rarely are. Societies that encourage it tends to be more advanced and successful though, since men get an equal share in the enterprise and are rewarded for working and fighting as a collective.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/23 08:38 PM
5

Most people would say a pro athlete is a Chad, Do they? I thought the hallmark of the Chad is extraordinary physically attractiveness. A pro athlete can very well be ugly while extremely fit.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/22 02:23 PM
3

That's why married men report being happier and living longer than their single and divorced counterparts. Or maybe women disproportionately marry and stay with content, capable, resourceful, healthy men and spurn the sickly poor sad-sacks...
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/22 09:22 PM
2

"But Lycurgus thought the labour of slave women sufficient to supply clothing. He believed motherhood to be the most important function of freeborn woman. Therefore, in the first place, he insisted on physical training for the female no less than for the male sex: moreover, he instituted races and trials of strength for women competitors as for men, believing that if both parents are strong they produce more vigorous offspring. He noticed, too, that, during the time immediately succeeding marria…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/21 05:33 PM
2

Don't know about that, Spartan women were famous for their freedom wealth and influence. And it was literally "cucked". As in eugenic, were those with superior qualities were encouraged to procreate. Thus they are noted for Wife sharing and lending. Old unfit men was to find admirable young men to impregnate their wives, men who struggled to conceive could ask for a pal for his wife in order to conceive an heir. Sparta was literally breeding chads.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/21 01:37 PM
2

You don't need to be desperate to realize you have overvalued yourself. No one says you must settle, but perhaps a relationship have qualities that some unmet standards can compensate for. Affection is also more then a list of qualities compare to family members.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/21 09:14 AM
1

I don't think it depend on anyone and men goes around expecting it. It's just a riff based on women's tendency to "improve" the men they taken a fancy to. The TV tropes definition of the Manic Pixie Dream Girl is also quite unfitting, it's quite rare she is passively there to change the male character. A more typical example is Katherine Hepburn's MPDG in the classical 1938 "Bringing up Baby". Cary Grant's Paleontologist is engaged to another women and perfectly happy rearranging dinosaus bones.…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/20 10:02 PM
2

Of course not, just saying that he was sentenced and punished for thought crime.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/20 02:21 PM
1

Dankula ended up with a fine and he didn’t pay it. That’s not a sentence. "In April 2018, Meechan was fined £800. Meechan stated he would not pay the fine, and instead donated £800 to the Glasgow Children's Hospital Charity. In March 2019, the money was seized from his bank account by an arrestment order." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Meechan Dankula was sentenced and punished accordingly.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/20 07:13 AM
2

Of course there is the question how often women contemplate how a man makes her feel, that she didn't previously considered physically attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/20 01:10 PM
2

It's not exercise itself that burns the calories. Most fatburning is just basic metabolism walking, sitting, sleeping chores etc. The best way to burn more fat is to build more muscle because 1, More muscle means more cells can absorb energy meaning less insulin in the blood to get rid of meals, more uptime on fatburning and 2, Dragging around more muscle mass increases basic metabolism accordingly, all everyday activity demands more energy which the body preferantially takes from the fat stores…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/20 04:20 PM
5

I don't think modern Chad is the equivalent of the historical warlord. Djingis Khan despite his legendary breeding of women, likely wouldn't do well on tinder today.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/20 08:03 PM
2

I always read women need context, know the actors to get turned on, which is why they dominate written smut. While men are more visual and care for the act itself largely uninterested in the plot or context.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/20 08:24 AM
1

It's a red flag, they correlate and symbolizes behaviour men find undesirable in female partners. I find it rare tattoos looks good on anyone but they certainly can. On women the addeded negative is that they tends to detracts from the softness of skin and roundness of limb (becoming more pronounced the lighter the skin), making them look less feminine. It can be mitigated if they follow curves and such but most female tattoos seems to be pictures breaking up the body.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/19 12:33 PM
2

Well I wanted to distinguish between "women are wonderful" and Mary Sue. Men with god like powers just doesn't stand out as much and they tend to have to earn their status rather then simply be created special. Go back to the 1940-50-60thies and you won't find any female Mary Sue's whatsoever in Media. See Vivien Leigh's Scarlet O'Hara Catherine Hepburn's characters or Marilyn Monroe's' alike ditzes, all flawed, vulnerable often silly stressing cooperation with men and with problems they can't b…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/19 10:26 AM
1

Mary Sue isn't necessary a female concept, women are just the most egregious examples presently thanks to politics. Go back back 20-30 years and you will struggle to find MaRey Sues.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/19 11:52 PM
6

By mothering they obviously mean providing extensive service while getting little in return as you would with an actual child. If you are supplying the listed "fatherly" services, it's not you they are talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/19 09:15 PM
1

Dunno about that. His first wife Börte famously wielded considerable influence over him. Soon after the marriage Börte was taken captive by the Merkits, a rival tribe and given to one of their warriors as a spoil of war. Temüjin was deeply distressed by the abduction of his wife and remarked that his bed “was made empty” and his breast was “torn apart”. He was determined to take her back and succeeded 8 months later. She shortly thereafter gave birth to a son Jochi, Which Temüjin claimed as his …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/19 09:07 AM
4

Well obviously? The world is increasingly gynocentric, With the welfare state women don't need a husband to survive anymore contraceptives and information technology gives them unprecedented access and choice of men. So naturally they share the most attractive ones sexually and betabux the rest as needed. The manospere are just attempts to navigate this modern reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/19 11:00 AM
1

You seem to not understand what I said. Feminists find it natural to hold all men accountable for the the actions of a few, for example If some men rape, the solution is that "we must teach men (the 3.5 billion of them) not to rape". If this group generalization is reasonable, it should follow that whenever a man does something positive it would be a credit to all men. Obviously both things are absurd. Yet one is a social mandate, the other isn't. Of course this blatant double standard misandry …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/19 07:06 PM
1

It's the feminists that made the rule that all males are card carrying members of the collective patriarchy. If men as a group are to share responsible for the misdeeds of individual men, it should follow that they also share in the accomplishments of individual men.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/19 06:20 PM
1

I'm sure it's fine. If you care about someone you want to now what's bugging them, but to men (generally) it's starting point to solve the issue and if they can't help they regard it as failure on their part(what I gathered from your previous confidants "arguing" back). Although in some cases men can be excessively stoic and simply wants to ignore problems. But if they love someone, that is more on themselves then others. It took me many years to understand that women amazingly feels better from…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/19 07:47 AM
2

It's nice that your guy understands that you just want to vent and are not asking him to help solve the problem (which is the typical male response, why burden someone with your problem if they can't do anything about it?). So he takes it because he cares about you, but being a negative emotion sponge is something that he in the long run will put in the negative column on your score sheet. Just saying.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/19 11:02 AM
1

Interestingly enough women were late comer's to the Nazi cause. (Which I guess you could chalk up to the follower part.) More women then men voted for Hindenburg over Hitler in the 1932 presidential election for example. Politically German women gravitated towards center parties tied to protestant and catholic churches and were less likely to vote left then men. This is a excellent of overview of the voting pattern leading to up to the nazi government. http://www.johndclare.net/Weimar6_Geary.htm…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/18 08:41 AM
1

Mmh they do. I always thought that thing about "written soley to help the man achieve his purpose" is a strong mischaracterization of the manic pixie dream girl. Virtually all women have some interest in rearranging a man's life to make him "better" "happier", ostentatiously for his sake, but in practice quite often to satisfy their own egos. If you take the archetype MPDG Catherine Hepburn's Susan Vance the story rotates wholly around her, she is spoiled rotten and does whatever she fancy, deci…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/18 10:23 PM
13

We have the pill due to male scientists. Like every other significant advancement. Once the pill was cheap and easily accessible it was unavoidable society would adopt to the breakthrough. Just about everything feminism claims to have achieved is a direct result of science giving women reproductive control.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/18 12:37 AM
-1

Men constantly complain about women who say "no short men" and women complain about men who say "no fat women". There's no double standard. A fat women can become slim if she wants, a short man can't diet and exercise himself taller.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/18 02:08 PM
1

My point was simply that marriage was a tool to safeguard viable human reproduction. It's an issue both for men and women, maybe even more so for men since their function as a provider and protector. If you can't deal with it your family and tribe won't survive. You're basically saying a lifetime of having a full-ride is equivalent to her reproducing with you. That's how men valued it throughout the ages, men toil to acquire the substantial wealth required to support a family and then buys the r…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/18 10:36 AM
1

I don't think you can say marriage is Gynocentric, it's simply how humans solved the problem of unwanted procreation, and religion simply serves to reaffirm it. Ultimately without birth control, a women can't control pregnancy and is incapable of dealing with the economic consequences, which falls upon her family and tribe. So in response they restricts their women's sexual availability in order to keep the father accountable. If a man wants sex he have to pay up for a marriage and can in return…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/18 03:11 PM
3

Should be rather obvious? The potential cost of of sexual infidelity is much greater for a man then a women, this is why we have the sexual double-standard of slut/stud and female sexuality have been controlled through the ages. Men that tolerate cuckoldry are breed out of existence.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/17 01:13 PM
2

Actually that's just a pinch of the absurdity. Women are poor weak damsels in distress that needs special protection, but you must never forget that they are equally as capable as men in everything, at the same time.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/17 04:14 PM
9

Reminds me of a friend of mine who was asked to help a couple of girls who struggled with a coffee machine, It didn't take him long to figure it out and then he started explaining the issue to them assuming they would be curious to know, but they just put out their cups said thanks and moved on. They wanted the coffee not knowledge, should they encounter the issue again, well chances are there is another a dude around.
/r/TheRedPill09/11/17 07:20 PM
3

Seems you regard betas as incapable of affecting change. The grunt work in building, maintaining and defending mankind is what betas do, all they need is direction, Once in a while a leader comes a long that says what they are thinking and offer solutions. Then things happens.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/17 12:51 PM
1

Well, I mean in a cramped spaceship hunted by monsters there isn't much space for the overt feminine and I don't think we get to learn much about Ripley in the first movie, It's the second that I think the character comes into her own. Yes she is competent and tough, but she never puts it on display in stark contrast to the space marines. She is naturally cautious and doesn't take unmotivated risks. She offers advice and defers to the male lead, and let the trained fighters do the fighting while…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/17 04:26 PM
1

In what way are Ripley masculine? That the role originally slated as male "Martin Roby" "cautious, intelligent, survivor" doesn't make Ripley a woman playing a man. The switch was made to break the pattern of a standard horror movie. Few would expect that the girl would be be the last one standing in a group of highly capable men. Most people find Ripley such and amazing character exactly because she is a female action hero that doesn't act like a man and doesn't possess asskicking girlpower tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/17 02:29 PM
2

Women as a whole are capable and strong but have been historically oppressed and subjugated. I don't know what's contradictory about that. Weird, I find it self-evidently contradictory. if the slaves are "capable" and "strong", it follows that their masters must be more capable and stronger to subjugate them. Why else would you submit to someone?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/17 12:17 PM
4

Some would say biology. A woman fertility decreases with age.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/17 08:15 AM
7

Well I couldn't speak for regular men as you can. But I think it's fairly obvious that traditional masculinity is not celebrated as it once was. I just proposed that young boys rejection of the oppressive patriarchy could be explained by the new social conditioning as well as them dropping the shackles of harmful gender stereotypes.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/17 02:26 PM
5

Or maybe the torrent of misandry in media and politics, discourage men from embracing "toxic masculinity"
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/17 12:22 PM
2

Still not much compared to many countries. It import half of it's electricty. Cold climate also increase the electricty bill and offer suboptimal conditions for agriculture. Sweden's economic success doesn't rest on natural resources but a diverse cutting edge manufacturing and service industry. Sweden's top export is refined petroleum btw a natural resource not present in the country.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/17 11:24 AM
2

What abundant natural resource do Sweden have? Timber and iron ore are the only that comes to my mind. Sweden's economic success is built on a cutting edge and diverse manufacturing and service industry and export of this. Fun fact Sweden's top export is refined petroleum a natural resource wholly imported.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/17 11:05 AM
3

Sweden is hardly rich in natural resources, iron ore and lumber are pretty much it and good conditions for hydro-electrical power perhaps. Countries that have natural resources in abundance doesn't tend to be very rich, since they make their money on exporting raw materials, while the real money generally is in processing and industry.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/17 10:46 AM
6

It is kinda fascinating. That it's overwhelmingly men that men gets the Nobel prizes isn't because they are smarter, it's just the patriarchy keeping women down, social intervention is needed to make them reach their natural 50%. That the prison population overwhelmingly is male, isn't due to sexism men simply are more violent. that's unfortunate biology. Intervention can't change that. The lack of Women in board rooms is a problem that require affirmative action, but the lack of female truck dr…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/17 03:17 PM
3

Feminism is certainly good at taken credit for stuff it had nothing to do with. It couldn't possibly be that better technology and and modern medicine improved living standards to the point that it removed much of the reasons, casual sex, divorce were socially unacceptable or made many household chores like food preservation, and cloth making, obsolete, thus didn't necessitate a women in the home anymore. Nope it was spiritual enlightenment, due to great womyn finally realizing the chains could …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/16 01:15 AM
3

I think there are plenty of men who wouldn't mind that. The problem is that she likely will struggle to be satisfied with him as a man if she supports him like a child.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/16 09:29 AM
2

Not my impression, I can't recall I ever seen a fat female med student and they are decidedly above average in looks. They tend to be consumed by the profession though and not the type who spend much time in front of a mirror.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/16 09:23 AM
6

Isn't this often covered? Women desire men mainly their status and for what they can do, Men desire women for how they look and are. Women are reluctant to date down. Meaning that the pool of men of interest for high status women is smaller. It's not the ego the make average Joe avoid female doctors, they just understand that that such a relationship isn't likely to work out since the women have little desire to cater to a man she sees as her social inferior.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/16 09:15 AM
5

No they wouldn't. Feminism has always been about appropriating the perks of men, while avoiding the obligations. During WW1 Emmanline Pankhurst and other leading feminists were at the forefront of the white feather movement, shaming men into enlisting. Pushing for conscription of men. Or in the great suffragette's own words: “The least that men can do is that every man of fighting age should prepare himself to redeem his word to women, and to make ready to do his best, to save the mothers, the w…
/r/MensRights29/07/16 09:04 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter