TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Yoinkitron5000 Archive

View 0 posts and 64 comments by Yoinkitron5000 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

True, but by doing one correctly you can minimize the chances that that happens. Also keep in mind that every married couple has a prenup, just the ones that don't make one for themselves have one made for them by the government.
/r/MensRights16/07/26 05:16 PM
5

You have to start a company, yourself, in order to have eventure capitalists interested in you in the first place
/r/MensRights14/07/26 01:36 AM
27

So brave.
/r/MensRights10/07/26 02:47 PM
9

The overwhelming majority of female-on-male violence is done using the state as a proxy... and then recorded, officially as being the opposite.
/r/MensRights21/06/26 11:46 PM
9

Apparently the forgot that women are also perfectly capable of being homophobic.
/r/MensRights01/06/26 12:16 PM
68

... or get another man/the government to attack you physically on their behalf.
/r/MensRights28/04/26 04:18 PM
7

That is essentially how it works, just not quite with those percentages
/r/MensRights03/04/26 10:50 PM
6

They are taught almost entirely by feminists for the first two decades of their lives. Its a lot of programming to overcome.
/r/MensRights29/03/26 07:49 PM
127

They have a hell of a hole to dig themselves out of, and that's assuming they are actually trying, which they probably aren't.
/r/MensRights24/02/26 10:15 PM
7

Charter schools need to become a ubiquitous thing just to give boys the hope of a chance of having and education system that doesn't despise them and set them up for failure intentionally.
/r/MensRights23/02/26 10:16 PM
31

"May"? I dont think I've ever heard of there being actual criminal charges ever. For all intents and purposes, paternity fraud is not only legal, but extremely profitable for those engaging in it.
/r/MensRights28/01/26 10:21 PM
12

Misandry being codified into law and policy on a regular basis also hurts a whole lot more than just feelings.
/r/MensRights27/01/26 07:59 PM
2

Its also a theory as to why, simultaneously, men are convicted of more violent crimes than women, but women world leaders are just as guilty of warmongering (if not more) than their male counterparts, since politics, by definition is the practice of getting other people to act on ones behalf.
/r/MensRights29/12/25 06:48 PM
1

My point was that the evidence points to women choosing to get a man to commit a crime on her behalf instead of doing it herself would also contribute to the discrepancy
/r/MensRights29/12/25 05:32 PM
33

90-95% of the people in prison for drug crimes are male. Men are not doing 90-95% of all the drugs.
/r/MensRights27/12/25 11:41 AM
2

>Sure they can be but most are not Yes they are.
/r/MensRights22/12/25 07:31 PM
5

Its also a fact that if a woman wants to greatly harm her partner, she has a whole set of ways to do so that are entirely legal, and carried out on her behalf by the state. Why would she go to the risk of committing a crime when she doesn't have to?
/r/MensRights22/12/25 07:25 PM
4

>Man all those checks notes white men Wealthy white men can be feminist (and therefore sexist against men) too.
/r/MensRights22/12/25 07:16 PM
46

All those statistics also fail to address the elephant in the room: If the average woman wants to harm her SO, she doesn't need to do it herself. She can call the police, make up a claim of abuse, and then have a uniformed agent of the state show up and abuse her SO on her behalf at taxpayer expense. Then, to add insult to injury, her government-assisted domestic abuse gets recorded officially as abuse being committed against her, rather than by her. Those skewed statistics are then used to just…
/r/MensRights22/12/25 07:09 PM
15

Women's violence against men usually takes the form of calling the authorities, and making up a story so that they do her violence for her, at taxpayer expense. That's just about as systemic as it can get. I.e. when the system literally does it for them.
/r/MensRights21/08/25 11:09 AM
62

I'm glad that shitshow is getting defunded and cancelled. Blatant propaganda.
/r/MensRights05/08/25 06:25 PM
1

It's starting to seem like kind of a "papal indulgences" kind of situation. i.e. You may sin and be absolved but only so long as the church receives a generous donation... not officially of course though.
/r/MensRights05/08/25 04:44 PM
21

>92% of gender-specific scholarships are still reserved for women. And the remaining 8% "for men" always come with some other qualifier, i.e. minority status. It's rarely, if ever just "reserved for men"
/r/MensRights05/08/25 04:42 PM
3

Its easy for a feminist to think that they're empathetic when no one is allowed to point out when they're wrong.
/r/MensRights22/07/25 02:05 PM
8

It's basically a cop out. "If anything we can frame as 'unequal' exists anywhere, our support for blatantly sexist policies is acceptable."
/r/MensRights15/07/25 11:13 AM
1

"Women-owned" businesses literally get a check from the government for being "women-owned" in addition to all the other legal benefits and preferential treatment these businesses receive. For some reason this doesn't count as either a privilege or an example of systemic sexism.
/r/MensRights14/07/25 03:51 PM
22

The average woman, if she were judged by the same objective standards that men were judged by, would either be fired from her job immediately, in prison, or dead.
/r/MensRights03/07/25 04:05 AM
109

I'm always impressed by the mental gymnastics required of people who want to claim that this is somehow not slavery. Also seemingly paradoxically, almost exactly the same group of people will claim, full heartedly, that having to go to work to get a paycheck in order to live is slavery, and as such, they should be allowed have whatever they want, for free and at the unwilling expense of everyone else around them.
/r/MensRights30/06/25 03:32 PM
7

Instant apocalypse.
/r/MensRights29/06/25 11:33 AM
10

Can definitely understand that. It's like staring into the void.
/r/MensRights01/06/25 03:07 AM
22

Yep. She had a bunch of health problems, hence the lack of posting or anything for a while now. What a champion though.
/r/MensRights01/06/25 02:46 AM
29

Really wish u/girlwriteswhat was still posting.
/r/MensRights01/06/25 01:56 AM
2

Saying some variant of "If it would be sexist for me as a man to say a certain thing about women, it's also sexist if a woman says a comparable thing about men." Basically do unto others as you would have them do unto you. The golden rule is misogyny now.
/r/MensRights14/05/25 03:04 PM
16

Eh, I don't like this saying. It's too easy to counter. It should be "If you want to know who rules over you, just look for who you are not allowed to criticize accurately or justifiably." Everyone would get mad at you for just throwing criticisms out willy-nilly. It's when those accusations are true and provable, and you're still not allowed to say them... that's the the group that has control over you, even if it's through another party. If that distinction isn't made, it allows feminists to p…
/r/MensRights13/05/25 08:24 PM
7

It's worth looking at how so much support "for the children" has to go to a woman first before the child even has a chance to benefit from it.
/r/MensRights13/05/25 08:21 PM
1

"We are so incredibly correct that it's only prudent that it be illegal to disagree with us."
/r/MensRights13/05/25 08:15 PM
3

"There's more women and children in refugee camps so they need more aid!" It's aggravating that they are so utterly incapable of even considering the question of why only women and children make it to the camps in the first place. Alternately: "We will only be distributing food and supplies to women and children" * men don't show up because they know they aren't welcomed. "See we were right to devote resources to women and children only. The men are probably off drinking beer and smoking cigars …
/r/MensRights13/05/25 08:10 PM
1

Feminists.
/r/MensRights12/05/25 02:49 PM
2

They want yet another excuse to make a government-funded struggle session, and call it therapy.
/r/MensRights28/04/25 05:57 PM
0

Even the bill Cosby case didn't have "bill cosby-like" evidence of spiking drinks. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=lJvijmbWOvk&pp=ygUQcmFnZWFob2xpYyBjb3NieQ%3D%3D
/r/MensRights09/04/25 09:59 PM
30

Yeah, that's a problem. It makes it almost impossible to find evidence to poke holes in a story. A lurid, elaborate lie, crafted with intent, is almost always going to sound more convincing than your real, but threadbare or nonexistent memory of the time in question.
/r/MensRights09/04/25 09:54 PM
185

Having these kinds of accusations essentially be "guilty until proven innocent" was not enough for the feminists. Now they want to be allowed to accuse you from a time period from so long ago that it's virtually impossible to have any surviving evidence proving your innocence. "Where were you on this exact day 25 years ago?" Hell if I know.
/r/MensRights09/04/25 05:51 PM
4

>And who set that system up Feminists.
/r/MensRights26/03/25 01:20 PM
13

Misandry kills by proxy. The police officers that show up to toss you in a cage and shoot you if you resist as the result of a false accusation are just as serious as when someone commits proportional violence themselves. This also comes with added injustice in that this type of violence against men gets recorded, officially, as violence by men instead.
/r/MensRights25/03/25 05:43 PM
46

They do try to present themselves that way but it's all just smoke and mirrors. There is actually quite a history of animosity between them and actual men's rights groups with the Good Men Project's true purpose seeming to be to draw support away from actual men's issues and to either waste the effort or redirect it to feminist causes.
/r/MensRights20/03/25 02:01 PM
81

Good Men Project has always been a feminist front group, and never actually supported men's rights.
/r/MensRights20/03/25 01:52 PM
52

It makes perfect sense when you realize that they don't actually want to prosecute real rapists. They want to eliminate the concept of presumptive innocence and be able to persecute their enemies using mere accusations. It's about power for them. Having an actual rapist be let go actually serves their agendas because it can be used as a rallying cry to lower the threshold for evidence required for conviction even more.
/r/MensRights19/03/25 09:32 PM
15

"Who raised those particular men?"
/r/MensRights24/02/25 01:47 PM
3

This question is way beyond reddit. Lawyer, immediately. Also start recording literally all communication, as you'll probably need it.
/r/MensRights13/02/25 05:14 PM
115

One of our schools best sports teams coach (not going to clarify for PII reasons) who was beloved by pretty much the whole school got stabbed to death by his wife in a fit of post partum depression (once, in the back). The entire conversation afterwards was how hard it must be FOR HER to deal the the loss of her husband who she loved so much. I didn't have to mental tools at the time at my disposal to pierce the feminist propaganda about how fucked up that was but I knew deep down that something…
/r/MensRights14/01/25 12:04 AM
1

"No u"
/r/MensRights10/01/25 07:05 PM
5

Sure they regularly use civilians as meat shields, but lying about it afterward? No, no one's that bad. /s
/r/MensRights10/01/25 04:15 PM
5

You're gonna have to explain the connection here to men's rights.
/r/MensRights03/12/24 09:46 PM
3

Every culture that allows ritual FGM also does circumcisions for equal or comparable reasons.
/r/MensRights26/11/24 04:30 AM
13

>but the two are not comparable. Indeed. The one that is still legal is infinitely worse than the one that is already outlawed. >There’s reasons that circumcision is done on males The "legitimate reason" that it's done to males is the equivalent of advocating that infants have their fingernails removed so that they won't have to clean under them.
/r/MensRights25/11/24 11:56 PM
22

>I actually avoid discussing those points, not because they're wrong, but exactly because they're the standard talking points. Everyone knows this stuff. Not everyone knows this stuff though. There's a good chance that if you're talking to a feminist and bring these things up, it's literally the first time he or she has heard them because chances are they've been blasted their whole lives that the men's rights movement has nothing to complain about and is just asking for privileges.
/r/MensRights25/11/24 11:54 PM
43

To add onto the graduation disparity, you should look into how virtually all gendered scholarships and special programs are still for women despite the ratios in attendance being overwhelmingly in favor of women, even when there is not even a gender-neutral equivalent that both men and women can partake in. e.g. there will be a special event for women in computer science... and that's it, no other event that everyone can participate in.
/r/MensRights25/11/24 11:48 PM
1

Yeah, unfortunately, for men just not being believed is one of the better outcomes. Chances are that if you call to report abuse committed by a woman against you, you have a better chance of going to jail than she does.
/r/MensRights25/11/24 11:18 PM
3

It's kind of funny. The horrific dystopia they imagine they are saving their daughters from (being forced into parenthood by the government at the moment conception happens) is just business as usual for the sons they haven't even spared a single thought for. They aren't pro-choice. They are pro-convenience.
/r/MensRights06/11/24 07:03 PM
4

A point that is not often brought up: At least part of any perceived imbalance between the rates of male against female violence compared to the reverse can be attributed to the fact that if a woman wants to hurt a man she simply has more options to do so that are entirely legal and are carried out by the state on her behalf.
/r/MensRights30/09/24 10:56 PM
39

Change your name on some of the applications and see if you get responses. Might be the beginning of a discrimination lawsuit.
/r/MensRights25/09/24 10:02 PM
2

Are there any efforts to impose some kind of gender parity in these departments, seems like an oversight if men's groups aren't taking up that angle of attack.
/r/MensRights25/09/24 10:01 PM
3

We are. Feminist organizations have a hell of a lot more money to oppose it though, so it's a long road.
/r/MensRights25/09/24 10:00 PM
2

Child support ends up just being alimony with hostages. It allows the custodial parent (almost always the woman) to say "if I starve, this kid starves also." And society just accepts that arrangement.
/r/MensRights25/09/24 09:57 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter