TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

YoubigdumbSOB Archive

View 1 post and 107 comments by YoubigdumbSOB on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

translation, "HURR DURR"
/r/MensRights21/11/18 07:35 AM
1

Haha, so true. Good observation; I never thought of that but that's dead on.
/r/MensRights20/11/18 07:38 PM
1

Great hypothesis but I'm here to correct that with facts: Her audience would absolutely consume and support positive messages. That is what they (and most women) do: WHAT EVERYONE ELSE AROUND THEM IS DOING. Furthermore if everyone in Hollywood did that rather than the opposite like they are doing right now, things would turn around rapidly. Just like things rapidly went downhill over the past few years as everyone got onto the same programming of "Men bad, women good."
/r/MensRights20/11/18 07:30 AM
1

Link, please. Or at least a description. How is one to know she had her buddies do anything?
/r/MensRights20/11/18 04:44 AM
1

I don't either, but the best way out is through, so fight.
/r/MensRights20/11/18 04:43 AM
3

trans women are men trying to fit in Lots of them are! It's very common now that being a man means being the lowest ranked member of society.
/r/MensRights20/11/18 04:42 AM
1

No, her audience are such sheep that if she had positively showcased several men, the women would have eaten it up.
/r/MensRights20/11/18 04:41 AM
2

This, exactly.
/r/MensRights20/11/18 04:40 AM
6

she is playing to her audience. Yes, but mostly no. Her audience will clap, cheer, and "you go, girl!" anything she says. She could have instead applauded various men for their integrity or hard work, and influenced her sheep in a good direction. Instead she just exhorted them all to drive one more nail in the coffin.
/r/MensRights20/11/18 04:40 AM
8

You could also show soldiers stationed in the Middle East cover in dirt and blood trying to keep an ideology at bay that would have her stoned to death in the streets for her sexuality. Savagely accurate insight here. Her hypocrisy is disgusting.
/r/MensRights20/11/18 04:37 AM
0

That special feeling I get when I troll someone so hard, they start writing long, triggered diatribes while also pretending to be the one trolling me, HAHAHAHA You didn't call me out for being insulting. You tried to insult me. Of course, you don't know my body type so you desperately hope calling me "fatty" will hurt my feelings. 1) The fact that you desire to hurt my feelings shows everyone that I won, I triggered you so hard you lashed out. 2) The fact that you insist I am fat even though I a…
/r/MensRights20/11/18 04:15 AM
-1

See, when I called you an idiot or whatever it was that I said, I based it on the supreme stupidity of your comments. When YOU call me fat, you're basing it solely on your pathetic desire to insult me by guessing at my weight. Ironically, /u/Merit_based_only, you couldn't make a merit based argument, LMAO
/r/MensRights15/11/18 08:46 PM
-2

Haha, "You stoop to insults, you try to win arguments on the internet" says the guy who yells "YR A BITCH!! YR FAT!!! UR ANGRY!!!" and tries to win an argument on the internet, LMAOOOOO And I didn't insult you. I made an accurate observation. Meanwhile you still haven't made a single cogent argument, just baseless assertions. Thank you for being my bitch. Obey yo massa, bitch!
/r/MensRights15/11/18 09:23 AM
1

Notice how they call competition as negative and cooperation as positive, YET, it's been proven countless times that women are much more interested in men who rise above others through competition. It's a classic example of feminist hypocrisy, where the toxic ideas of how men SHOULD be, don't hold up to what men and women really want from men. It's just like how Jennifer Siebel Newsom's documentary says that masculinity is problematic, and they had a panel on it hosted by Maria Shriver. They pre…
/r/MensRights14/11/18 04:14 AM
1

Jesus Christ. The Left has no dignity at all.
/r/MensRights14/11/18 04:02 AM
1

Loser can't let it go, and tries to put it on me, LOL Still stuck stooping to insults without having any evidence to back it up. How pathetic. Get on my level and compose an insult based on reality, dummy.
/r/MensRights14/11/18 04:01 AM
2

No comments?! This is very interesting stuff. Thank you for posting it.
/r/MensRights14/11/18 04:00 AM
1

As the Koreans say, Hory shit!!!!!
/r/MensRights10/11/18 05:28 PM
4

Wait, they cause the boys to hook up with each other, then threaten to expose them? 1) If the boys aren't gay and wouldn't have hooked up with each other otherwise, that's an incredibly fucked up message. Imagine if a lesbian girl was induced to make out with a straight guy. LE OUTRAGE 2) Threatening to "expose" someone for homosexual behavior? The show is promoting the idea that engaging in homosexual behavior is shameful.
/r/MensRights10/11/18 05:18 PM
1

That is bad news. :( Can you give some examples?
/r/MensRights10/11/18 04:54 PM
14

Thanks for posting. One issue you should tune up is that the first part of this list is scattered. It goes like this: First Wave Quotes from First, Second, and Third Wave First Wave first wave: A)
/r/MensRights10/11/18 04:52 PM
1

You look awfully foolish doing nothing but insisting you are right (and insisting I am fat, despite having ZERO evidence, LOL), while not PROVING you are right in any way. And, I do not treat others, or even you, the way you are behaving. That is evidence of how unintelligent you really are. You see, you have no proof that i am fat (and in fact I am very much NOT fat). I don't make such assertions. You do. I also prove the ways people are wrong. You do not. But then again, you CANNOT. LOLLLLL
/r/MensRights09/11/18 09:31 PM
0

LOL, moron still making dumb personal attacks (like presuming I'm fat, HAHA) rather than actually proving anything other than his own feebleness. It's pathetic that you are SO triggered that you just call names rather than "Here's where I am right and you are wrong." I pity you, but I still find delight in ridiculing your weakness. Thank GOD most men are better than you.
/r/MensRights09/11/18 06:56 PM
1

You will never see an organization compare female to male pay FOR THE SAME JOB. They will only show you the averaged pay of however much all women earn, vs. the averaged pay of however much all men earn.
/r/MensRights09/11/18 12:15 PM
8

The Pipeline Angels will not act on racism against whites, sexism against men, and cisphobia. But feminism is for equality, right.
/r/MensRights07/11/18 12:34 AM
1

Translation, "If I say that I'M the one telling THEM to continue, it'll seem like I'm not doing as they say!" HAHAHAHA Go ahead, explain how on Earth I'm proving you right. You can't. That is why you keep obeying me: I made you my bitch all over again. LOLLLLLL
/r/MensRights04/11/18 01:00 PM
1

"If I rub this dog shit on my face enough times maybe I'll seem like I really WANT to be doing it" LOLLLLLLL
/r/MensRights01/11/18 10:31 PM
1

I'm sure it's more of a philosophical disagreement we're having. Not at all. Go look at my original comment. I no longer understand your argument You never did.
/r/MensRights01/11/18 10:31 PM
1

I love it. The most insecure people (always men, I notice) don't have the guts to go "Shit." and slink off. You think "Shit. If I stop now /u/Youbigdumbsob will see me slink off with my tail between my legs. But there's nothing else I can say and I can't attack /u/Youbigdumbsob for anything said here, so.... I'll just keep insisting." HAHA It's no different than Pee Wee Herman's face plant followed by "I meant to that." OBEY YO MASSA, BITCH! wa-PSSH!
/r/MensRights01/11/18 09:33 PM
-1

Says the guy who is so wrapped up in NOT being wrong, that he is STILL desperately insisting a week later. You fail to recognize that I have been doing this for years under various accounts; ridiculing people like you for making dumb assertions and then watching them (read: YOU) get so triggered that they can't stop. One after another their ego humiliates them over a period of days. Of course, if they were RIGHT they could easily prove it, but they never are of course, which is the entire reason…
/r/MensRights01/11/18 09:25 PM
1

LOL, that's your argument? That is the silliest thing ever. I'm sorry that your ego doesn't allow you to say "That's true. I realize I wasn't being accurate."
/r/MensRights01/11/18 09:02 PM
1

Even alpha predators live brutal lives, when they are too successful their prey dies off, No. By "when" you mean "if," and "dies off" you mean "killed off." IF they are too successful THEN they have less food. Your false claim is like saying "humans lead short, brutal lives because when they are born with progeria, then they age quickly." You take the exception and claim it applies to all. Wrong. Then you change the subject. But I keep disproving your original statement (and many subsequent ones…
/r/MensRights01/11/18 10:26 AM
39

Pathetic. Here's a bar graph showing the real difference. https://imgur.com/ECNqhd2
/r/MensRights01/11/18 09:34 AM
2

Great stuff here. Much more conversational than some of her other interviews. Also check out her YouTube; the best videos there are AWESOME.
/r/MensRights01/11/18 09:30 AM
2

That's funny, because the biggest actual perpetrators of terror - not just THREAT of terror but people who DO terrorize others - are black men and black teen boys. Not all, of course, but the small percentage of those who do, is a much bigger part of the national population than the number of white men who are mere "threats" who MIGHT commit acts of terrorism. What a coincidence that the person claiming that, IS a black man.
/r/MensRights01/11/18 09:29 AM
2

Really? Everything in nature?? Galapagos tortoises? Blue whales? Elephants? Sea snakes? Eagles? Dolphins? The list of creatures that DON'T live short, brutal lives and in fact lead long lives, often full of play, is FAR longer than your completely ignorant and wrong statement. This is how we know you're not a biologist or even anyone who knows the most basic things about the natural kingdom.
/r/MensRights01/11/18 09:11 AM
0

Notice that all you do is insist (not prove) and insult. Those are the twin hallmarks of a loser with no argument but a big insecurity complex. LMAO See, if you actually were right, you would annihilate my argument, rightly so. But you can't, because you're wrong, and keep insisting so desperately because you are trying to save your pathetic ego. I'm so sorry. (Not really, LOL)
/r/MensRights01/11/18 09:10 AM
1

No, it is not self-evident. Some animals live very long lives. Some do not. Some die brutally. Some do not. But wow, talk about hamstering to justify your little dogma!
/r/MensRights31/10/18 01:14 PM
0

I didn't attempt to virtue signal at all, but it's forever amusing that your ego interpreted what I said as that. LOL Even funnier, you stooped to insulting me rather than actually proving even one single part of my argument wrong. HAHA, you failed miserably!
/r/MensRights31/10/18 01:13 PM
0

Translation: “Youbigdumbsob showed what a shitty, petty person I like to be and now I’m proving her right with a misogynistic slur.” LOL
/r/MensRights29/10/18 04:52 AM
1

That’s a mighty long bunch of false presuppositions. Starting from “grinding up alive any animal but an apex predator is more kind than letting them live” to “wild animals only lead short, brutal lives” to “chickens might be extinct if humans hadn’t bred them for meat production.” Talk about hamstering!
/r/MensRights29/10/18 04:50 AM
9

Too bad this graph isn't shown as a percentage of population, instead of just total numbers.
/r/MensRights27/10/18 07:31 AM
4

Not so. This trend ALSO includes children of unwed mothers and children without a father in the home, two things that directly correlate to MANY bad outcomes for boys. Marriage is not a bad thing. Marriage to a fucked up person IS a bad thing. You are VERY mistaken to think that marriage is inherently bad and the statistical data on that is crystal clear.
/r/MensRights27/10/18 07:30 AM
2

The difference is, in the natural world most things have a chance. A coyote might eat a chick, or that chick might get to enjoy life for quite a while. In factory farming, no chick ever has any chance to have a nice life, ever, for any amount of time. Furthermore, coyotes don't have the option of using rational thought and empathy to recognize the chicks' pain and come up with a humane way to dispatch the chick. Humans DO feel empathy and we DO KNOW how to be humane, but we choose not to. Especi…
/r/MensRights27/10/18 07:27 AM
2

You mean you hate humans who are ok with that, or support that. "I really hate humans" is no different than "I really hate men" just because SOME men do things you don't like.
/r/MensRights27/10/18 07:23 AM
3

when you put it like that. You mean, accurately?
/r/MensRights27/10/18 07:22 AM
4

No, it hasn't emerged. It has been ALLEGED. If a man had been ACCUSED of something but women posted saying he HAD done it, you and many others would have a shitfit. Don't be a hypocrite. Be accurate.
/r/MensRights27/10/18 07:06 AM
2

I believe you. Just check out the videos on YouTube from black men and women discussing why this is generally the case. Note: you will have a very hard time doing that because far-Left YouTube actively suppresses videos like that. Don't believe me? Try searching it for a video called Why Black Women Are Undateable. First off, unlike other SJW-approved videos it will never show in the autosuggest box. Second, once you hit 'Enter,' unlike other SJW-approved videos it won't even be at the top of th…
/r/MensRights27/10/18 06:57 AM
1

Gotta love the ones who have options but complain that they have no options.
/r/MensRights27/10/18 06:30 AM
6

my profile stipulates: * no kids * must have job * must not be over 30 and live with mom and dad. Why do you want them to live with their mom and dad? Is it ok if they live with just mom? What if they live with just dad?
/r/MensRights27/10/18 06:26 AM
2

That's one way to look at it. Or you can choose to see yourself as having so much value that you are the one interviewing them. I would never try to connect with anyone I hoped picked me. I prefer to screen them to see whether they meet my standards. If they aren't interested then so be it, but I have choice and I'm very picky. Try it. It will change your results for the better.
/r/MensRights27/10/18 01:44 AM
4

Yes, and sometimes people put requirements as a way to tell themselves "This is the reason I'm not getting many messages."
/r/MensRights27/10/18 01:42 AM
3

Sorry to hear how crappy those women are to you. Those are the same women who will complain "Where did all the good men go?" later. Good job, dummies! And at the very core and it most cases is about an insecurity to be silently judged by a stranger or acquaintance for being next to your shorter SO. Exactly. It's so hard to find a compatible partner that it's really tragic when someone lets insecurity ruin a good relationship. Anyone who says they "can't" wear heels (of course she could) is denyi…
/r/MensRights27/10/18 01:40 AM
0

She's not dumb. Her height has nothing to do with her height preference. If you think tall guys dislike short chicks you don't know what you're talking about.
/r/MensRights27/10/18 01:34 AM
1

No, all that does is take a person who was wrongly accusing you of being an asshole, and suddenly proving to them that you are one after all. ​ ​ A better strategy is to point out the double standard. If you can change even one person's mind you have done something good, rather than just insult someone as you say.
/r/MensRights27/10/18 01:32 AM
2

I've seen faaar faaaaaaar more women with a black dude than I've seen men with a black chick. Yes, OkCupid's data from a several (almost 10?) years ago before they went full SJW, shows that black women are the least messaged combination of race and sex. If that's not a wake-up call to change their behavior then nothing will be.
/r/MensRights27/10/18 01:30 AM
4

Haha, insightful comment of the day
/r/MensRights27/10/18 01:27 AM
1

LOL, I don't need to prove anything. You are the one making the baseless assertion about what Libertarianism supposedly is, even though you can't back it up. It's interesting how important it is to you to INSIST you're right, even despite clear evidence you're wrong. Why are you so afraid of such an ordinary thing as saying "Oh, I was mistaken." ?? Did your father ridicule you, or perhaps a bunch of people at school when you were small?
/r/MensRights23/10/18 03:56 PM
0

Low effort. Try again; you look like a loser just sitting there insulting me rather than proving anything about Libertarianism. Wait, my bad! You can't, because you're wrong. I get it now. Sorry about your ego, bro!
/r/MensRights23/10/18 07:25 AM
-1

No, I'm making correct assessments. Get on my level.
/r/MensRights23/10/18 07:02 AM
-1

LOL, let me guess, you also think "racism" means "race-based oppression but ONLY from a position of power and that means you can't be racist against whites," because you have your own definitions you heard from someone else. LMAO
/r/MensRights23/10/18 06:55 AM
0

It's clear you're under a gross misunderstanding or maybe you choose to willfully mischaracterize Libertarians. They generally don't believe everything should be privatized, just that either the free market can do a hell of a lot better job at administering things for the gov't (and there's an overwhelming amount of evidence for that), or that MOST but not all things should be privatized. This, however: “Why are the police forcing me to work for no pay?” Is ridiculous and has no relation to Libe…
/r/MensRights23/10/18 06:38 AM
1

Not at all, that's the irony. If you think the issue of one person killing another is not about the victim, please explain how that is possibly so. LOL
/r/MensRights23/10/18 02:17 AM
0

LOL, how so?
/r/MensRights23/10/18 02:16 AM
1

Do you really think MRAs would have issues with removing racism/sexism? What do you mean "would"??
/r/MensRights23/10/18 02:16 AM
7

Feminists are further to the right than Libertarians which is about as far right as anyone here gets. wat ​ LOL no. ​ Libertarians are pro-LIBERTY, hence the name. Feminists openly call for (and achieve) restrictions for men while women don't suffer the same lack of freedoms. Feminists call for special privileges for women but not for men. They are FAR more big-gov't and left-wing than Libertarians.
/r/MensRights22/10/18 08:42 AM
6

Kanye hasn't committed culture suicide. He has dragged a lot of blacks, especially men, with him. Good for Kanye.
/r/MensRights22/10/18 08:39 AM
9

If he is willing to say the things that need to be said and bring light to issues men face than why not support him? ​ That's the thing. He's not willing to say those things. In fact, Bill, as funny as he can be, is pretty well blue pilled and perpetuates MANY feminist hypocrisies, such as women not being punished for hitting men, etc. Just because he AT TIMES is irreverent doesn't mean he really gets it. If you listen to his show it's clear he's his wife's bitch.
/r/MensRights22/10/18 08:37 AM
3

> Chris Rock is probably the most anti-PC comedian of all time. ​ No, far from it. Lenny Bruce was FAR less PC than Chris.
/r/MensRights22/10/18 08:33 AM
1

It's not hyperbole, which is why as you admit, it's not wrong. In the end it's down to the mother and the parents whether or not to go through with the pregnancy or not. That's the problem. It's down to the mother whether or not to kill that child. That should not be legal. Which is why the majority of people in this country are against it. The debate about abortion isn't whether or not we're taking a life, it's about whether we respect the choices of the parents or not and how far we're willing…
/r/MensRights22/10/18 08:14 AM
1

>“women don’t have p******” ​ Pussies? They certainly do. And porn is exactly where you'll see proof. ​ ​ Oh, PENISES. Since when must "penis" be censored in the news?!?!
/r/MensRights21/10/18 04:15 AM
1

Pro- woman's choice to kill a kid? What about the baby's choice and rights? ​ ​ People in favor of abortion say it's about "her body." No, it's about whether she has the legal right to kill THE CHILD'S BODY.
/r/MensRights21/10/18 04:06 AM
1

LOL, really?! Please be kidding.
/r/MensRights13/10/18 11:45 PM
2

Great point. The answer is: Because, according to her, even the good men are far from being good enough.
/r/MensRights13/10/18 05:49 AM
2

Also, the "mean-spirited, teasing, punching thing that passes for male culture." -- Neuroscience researchers, evolutionary biologists, and more, have found that male MAMMALS enjoy rough-and-tumble play. It's not cultural, it's BIOLOGICAL. ​ ​ And, it helps young males' brain development (yes, the actual organ, not just the mind), as well as socialization, confidence, serotonin levels, etc. ​ ​ The idea that boys and men are WRONG for the way we naturally play, is EGREGIOUSLY wrong. ​ ​ It's no d…
/r/MensRights13/10/18 05:49 AM
0

> Have you ever thought for a second that it’s not always about profit. ​ No, because it's ALWAYS about profit. In fact, making decisions about profit is their legal obligation as a publicly-traded company. Please understand I'm not being condescending when I point out that it is evident to me that you are very young and totally without experience when it comes to publicly held companies, or large companies that are privately held for that matter. ​ > maybe for the people in lower positions havi…
/r/MensRights11/10/18 11:44 PM
0

HAHA, no, asking questions isn't an ad hominem attack. But it IS a GREAT example of you taking simple questions and statements as attacks against you as a person. LOLLLLLLLL As-is, I have won by defualt. No, you haven't won anything, and it's spelled "default." Good day, sir. That's an example of you tapping out and losing. HAHA
/r/MensRights11/10/18 06:39 PM
1

I do agree that we need better female representation Why do we supposedly need that? Do you think people on the boards of for-profit companies really and truly make decisions based not on personal gain or even profit for the company but on the basis of helping people of their own sex?
/r/MensRights11/10/18 06:14 PM
1

LOLLLLL!! So very true. Ah, god, you made my morning.
/r/MensRights11/10/18 06:13 PM
4

No. It's fine according to the Bill. Look it up yourself. I did.
/r/MensRights11/10/18 06:13 PM
5

Has no-one here even read this law? It specifically says that women must be present. It does not say that any men must be present on the board. Thus an all-women board is ok by the State. An all-male board is illegal.
/r/MensRights11/10/18 06:12 PM
1

My response isn't ad hominem at all. I pointed out YOUR ARGUMENT, which was YOUR ATTEMPT TO MISCHARACTERIZE MY STATEMENT. I didn't attack you at all. Do you always interpret statements about your actions as being attempts to discredit YOU as a person?? Furthermore, you are the person here who made ad hominem attacks. Shall I copy and paste them? They're still there. You failed here, x2.
/r/MensRights11/10/18 06:08 PM
1

You sure you're not? You clearly argue like one.
/r/MensRights11/10/18 06:07 PM
1

you should stop this racist tirade and shut the fuck up. Your attempt to mischaracterize my statement as a tirade invalidates you. Sorry about your need to stoop so low. Is it that you are insecure or do you just not have faith in your opinion? Does it relate to not having a good father figure perhaps? Also the fact that you yourself are on a tirade says it all. LOL
/r/MensRights10/10/18 04:09 PM
1

Of course the upvotes disagree. This is reddit. If upvotes = right, then everyone is guilty according to any feminist subreddit. LOL
/r/MensRights10/10/18 04:00 PM
1

Translation: "Hurr durr, women and blacks get crap just for being themselves and white men have all the privileges and power!!!"
/r/MensRights10/10/18 04:22 AM
2

So there's something wrong with a black person who thinks we don't get a bunch of shit for being black? No, there's not. Nor is there anything wrong with other black people who agree with me. Thanks for pointing out to everyone that you too are a major kool-aid drinker. What you're saying is no different than insisting women get shit all the time just for being women. Which they don't. They get special treatment, just like black men do. OP didn't prove it at all. OP stated it. So did you. You ha…
/r/MensRights10/10/18 02:39 AM
1

Obviously that's true. No. It's not true and it's not obvious. You really think there are equal numbers of female and male bank robbers? Female and male murderers? You are the most ignorant person I've ever met. Do you think it's twenty times more? Yes, we know it is. Because we have video of every bank robber ever, every day of the year. And yes, it's almost all men. LOL WTF Your level of ignorance and failure to understand that correlation doesn't equal causation, is STAGGERING.
/r/MensRights10/10/18 02:34 AM
3

No, I managed to be accurate. You think black men just as a matter of course, get a bunch of shit for being black? ok, where's your proof? I gave plenty in my rebuttal but so far you just have empty claims of "But they're victims!!!!" Oh, name calling. Yeah, you make a VERY persuasive argument there: "Nuh uh!!! You're sexist and racis!!!! Also you're an asshole!!" , LOLLLLLL You won't advance either men's rights or racial harmony with your victim mindset. Black men just DO NOT get a bunch of shi…
/r/MensRights09/10/18 08:08 PM
1

In other words there's an incredibly strong racism element to #MeToo just as there was when all this happened before in the 1920s and they used to lynch the accused, again mostly black men Whoa, incredibly faulty logic there. By your logic the reason around 95% of jail and prison inmates are men is an incredibly strong sexist thing. Do you really think women rob just as many banks as men? Kill just as many people? Commit just as many robberies? Of course not. Because women tend to behave differe…
/r/MensRights09/10/18 07:58 PM
-1

BOOM. MVP of the thread
/r/MensRights09/10/18 09:00 AM
2

I feel real bad for black men. They get shit because they're black No. They get put on a pedestal because they're black. They can say "nigger" rather than "the n-word," they get special victim status - for example, you: you bought into the idea they're victims! They receive preferential admission to college and scholarships based SOLELY on race, they get societal deference on account of being black... No. They do NOT get shit because they're black. Claiming they do is no different than claiming …
/r/MensRights09/10/18 08:59 AM
1

We've all seen feminist and SJW protesters block college protests. For example, the ones captured on camera in Cassie Jaye's 'The Red Pill' documentary. Janice's explanation of the details of the Sydney protests in this link , is very eye opening. Please, guys (and women), let's stand up to these anti-male, anti-truth bullies and see whether we can set a precedent for universities holding people accountable for abusive protests.
/r/MensRights08/10/18 09:24 PM
1

Thanks!
/r/MensRights07/10/18 04:22 AM
3

She's entitled to anonymity? What's that about? Can any Australians explain the legal basis under the law for this?
/r/MensRights03/10/18 01:22 AM
1

You are correct. We have two sexes. Each of those can express varying degrees of masculinity and femininity.
/r/MensRights27/09/18 07:51 PM
1

Just saw your reply. While you agreed with me that we are responsible for what was say, you dodged my point. My point was that putting words in someone’s mouth is not interpretation, period. I repeat (because you don’t seem to get it): we are responsible for exactly what we say - again, WHAT WE SAY - and are not responsible for some other thing you think we meant.
/r/TheRedPill16/11/17 05:44 AM
1

No, putting words into someone's mouth is not interpretation. We are responsible for what we say. We are not responsible for some other thing you think we meant, LOL.
/r/TheRedPill31/08/17 05:00 PM
1

How rare? Please give proof.
/r/TheRedPill10/08/17 07:56 PM
1

I never said I need you to explain anything. I asked you to expand on your statement. Look at you trying to twist my words and intentions! Tsk, tsk That list is not inherent in marriage. Those are things that are present in some cases some of the time And it's a pointless and flawed list because I said "on your terms." If you live a place where prenup can be dismissed then you wouldn't be getting married on your own terms there. Duh. Pretty simple.
/r/TheRedPill10/08/17 09:42 AM
0

LOL, "REEEEE!!!!" "I'm young and upset at your words!! And even though people with doctorates who have spent decades researching human behavior have found that connection and pair bonding is a requirement for fulfillment in older humans, I assume I'm smarter than them, and that I know what I'll be like in the future! And I'll insult you because I'm so upset that I have to attack you personally!!" Hahahaha
/r/TheRedPill10/08/17 07:56 AM
1

Your point? You didn't say "When I'm an old man, I am quite certain that I will _____." You got all emotional and reactive and said "Fuck you". That's not a point. LOL
/r/TheRedPill10/08/17 07:50 AM
1

Society won't let it? Please expand
/r/TheRedPill10/08/17 07:41 AM
2

And there we have the "REEEEE!!!" I mentioned, LOL
/r/TheRedPill10/08/17 07:35 AM
1

Kudos for not doing the usual closed minded "REEEEE!!!" of most on here. Also, watch some Jordan Peterson videos on having a successful life. He accurately sums up people's needs as we age, and explains why women riding the cock carousel AND men living TRP their whole lives is a strategy for misery later.
/r/TheRedPill09/08/17 09:43 PM
9

You have missed some big picture wisdom too. TRP is a sexual strategy. Regardless of whether it is effective as a sexual strategy: as a LIFE strategy, especially for an older adult, it is woefully ineffective. People need connection, and mutual trust and respect, when we are older. Life as an aging bachelor is VERY different than as a young guy, and if you proceed to live this young man's strategy for your whole life despite your changing human needs, you are in for a bad surprise. That's why yo…
/r/TheRedPill09/08/17 09:38 PM
15

You sure swallowed someone else's ideology! Lie and say you make more money than your woman? Yeah, you deserve whatever you get.
/r/TheRedPill09/08/17 09:13 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter