TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Younity Archive

View 0 posts and 25 comments by Younity on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Little bit of both. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_bloc
/r/PussyPassDenied12/02/18 11:38 PM

As Lisa was getting pushed around for her unprovoked act of violence, she called out for help "NEED SOME MUSCLE OVER HERE!!!" Unfortunately, her calls were never returned because there was never muscle in the first place.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/02/18 08:01 PM
1

Ok good point but I'm not calling you a cuck I'm just saying that it shouldn't necessarily negate the points someone makes if they use it.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/01/18 06:44 AM
3

Cuck is just a funnier term for 'emasculated man'. It's actually a legitimate derogatory word if used right, or what, you're gonna start saying we can't call other people names to describe how their beliefs are weak minded, self-loathing, and pandering to women to appear socially virtuous? It's self-emasculation in one word, and it works to describe guys who would chop off their own dicks if it meant a woman would love them.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/01/18 01:10 AM
4

She was talking to someone who wasn't boarding the train, saying goodbyes or meet ya laters, or hey lets watch that telly show sometime. Basically frivolously holding up the train and potentially other trains on the line because she has no conception of people having somewhere to be.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/11/17 08:06 PM
1

That's not the most polite course of action.
/r/MensRights07/04/14 10:09 AM

Good point.. but even then, knowing how crazy other people can be keeps me sane.
/r/MensRights10/06/13 09:56 AM

I think it's just the embodiment of the "you can't have your cake and eat it too"
/r/MensRights10/06/13 09:01 AM

While I have nothing wrong with cleaning out friends list.. I honestly think that exposure to opposing opinions and lifestyles is necessary to maintain balance in your own life. If you delete everyone you disagree with, then your worldview may become more limited.
/r/MensRights10/06/13 08:58 AM
16

The point is not to perpetuate a cycle of ad hominem attacks back and forth as that is actually counter productive to enjoying life together. While I agree with the dogma, I wouldn't share this view in public. It's basically on the level of atheism if you were to post something like this on your facebook or to bring it up in some casual conversation, especially the language used which is maybe excessively hateful.
/r/MensRights12/04/13 07:05 AM
1

I'm glad you posted this because this is what is needed in any dialogue.
/r/MensRights28/01/13 11:34 PM
0

There literally are medical and hygienic benefits. Is that so hard to believe?
/r/MensRights01/09/11 10:13 PM
-2

I get it but I think it's retarded.
/r/MensRights01/09/11 10:12 PM
1

I imagine the last thing you want to do in that situation is talk to the person at all.
/r/MensRights01/09/11 12:25 PM
-6

Certainly, what does that have to do about circumcision though?
/r/MensRights01/09/11 12:24 PM
-4

There are benefits to circumcision.
/r/MensRights01/09/11 11:41 AM
0

Technicalities? I'm asking for proof that you demand exists somewhere on the site itself. Can you brandish some proof for me? No? Fine then, but you cannot possibly think that linking a shitty blog means anything. My point is even in your irrelevant news post, the screencap shows that the article has already been changed and the person is viewing an older revision. Do you understand the concept of saving, son?
/r/MensRights01/09/11 03:55 AM
2

I like how you failed to link to a specific Wikipedia article, as I described above.
/r/MensRights01/09/11 03:45 AM
2

I'd like for you to find a troll article right now for me, do it. Even if you deface an article yourself right this second and link it, I bet by the time I check it it will already have been reverted to a non-troll state. tl;dr; you have never successfully vandalized wikipedia, like 99% of the other users.
/r/MensRights01/09/11 01:19 AM
1

I don't know about you but I see several external links on that wikipedia page.
/r/MensRights31/08/11 11:59 PM
1

In what case? This isn't a post about wikipedia.
/r/MensRights31/08/11 11:55 PM
2

Generally if I wanted to use wikipedia as a frontend to my sourcing, which I do, I use the source wikipedia lists. This is how I fail to see what is wrong with wikipedia.
/r/MensRights31/08/11 11:45 PM
2

What is the problem exactly?
/r/MensRights31/08/11 11:42 PM
2

List a source better than wikipedia.
/r/MensRights31/08/11 11:22 PM
1

wooo
/r/seduction08/10/10 06:26 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter