TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

YoureAllCasuals Archive

View 0 posts and 32 comments by YoureAllCasuals on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-36

THANK YOU for being an ally, have an upvote!
/r/PussyPassDenied27/12/17 02:07 AM
2

women to be equal in every respect, and they should That's where you're wrong pal
/r/PussyPassDenied22/11/17 05:32 AM
0

especially in minority communities Not really
/r/PussyPassDenied18/10/17 05:45 AM

Anyone else bothered by the response to things like this? It's like the first thing out of anyone's mouth is "think of all the real rapists who will get away with it now". Like wtf? How about all the innocent men whose life and reputation was destroyed? Fucking hell man, it's always all about how women are somehow the victim.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/08/17 08:51 AM
51

about why women aren't fit to be software engineers Not true. Read the memo itself instead of the summary on whatever left wing site you got that from.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/08/17 11:02 PM
1

Oh okay. So just kill them then right?
/r/PussyPassDenied07/07/17 06:00 AM
1

People are doing what they want to do. There is no problem to be solved.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/07/17 06:02 AM
1

primacy of work, emotional control, desire to win, pursuit of status lmao these are "toxic masculine" traits? Anyway, you can't say every defining quality of manliness is toxic and then say it's not about men. Modern feminism is just dressed up misandry.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/06/17 03:45 AM
5

Every communist revolution in history has wanted the state to seize all private property and then they wanted the state to dissolve itself. Problem is the whole "dissolve itself" part never happened. That doesn't change the fact that communism, which advocates for a stateless society as an end goal, is anarchist by definition. You and everyone else arguing this clearly don't understand what communism is and how to argue against it properly, which is a damn shame considering how dangerous communi…
/r/PussyPassDenied21/06/17 06:23 AM
2

That is what I meant when I said it is fundamentally a flawed ideology. Communism is a stateless classless society, but that is impossible to implement without force. Hence Marxist-Leninists argue for the need to first implement a strong central government to seize private property and then the government is supposed to dissolve into communism after the fact. The problem is they never make it past the totalitarian stage because governments do not dissolve themselves. However, this does explain w…
/r/PussyPassDenied21/06/17 02:45 AM
4

Feel free to point out where I'm wrong if that's why you're downvoting.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/06/17 12:43 AM
-4

Look up the definition of communism. It is by definition stateless. How is an ideology that endorses a stateless society NOT anarchist? It is anarchist. I prefaced my previous comment with "I hate communists" because I know it sounds like the weak "not real communism bro" excuse communists use for the atrocities of the 20th century. Commies are right in that they have never gotten "real communism", but it's because the ideology is fundamentally doomed to failure and every communist revolution le…
/r/PussyPassDenied21/06/17 12:30 AM
-7

Yes, and I hate communists btw. Just because the useless idiot commies never got the stateless classless society that they wanted doesn't mean that communism isn't anarchist. They've never made it past the socialist dictatorship phase and never will, but communism is by definition anarchist.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/06/17 12:18 AM

communists are anarchists.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/06/17 11:59 PM
3

The police here won't kill anybody unless there is an immediate threat to themselves or those around them. Nor would I. However, when you confront someone in the act of stealing your property they may choose to threaten you rather than retreat. Shooting them in that case is imo justified the same as it is when police do it. I can see your argument that you don't think untrained civilians like myself will handle the situation correctly. I would rather the legality be handled on a case by case bas…
/r/PussyPassDenied14/06/17 11:16 AM
1

Stealing property becomes a violent crime when they try to take it by force, which is the case if you are trying to stop them. If they are going to fight you for your property rather than walk away, then they are the aggressor. They are instigating. Shooting in self-defense is not an execution. You will happily call police to do the same for you. You just like to be removed from the violence that enables your peaceful, orderly life.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/06/17 10:07 AM
2

Property rights are defended by force in every country. In Australia you simply have other people do it for you at all times. Say someone steals your car in front of you and you call the police - what do you think happens if that thief resists arrest in Australia? The police will escalate their use of force. If necessary the police in Australia can and will kill a criminal who is resisting/fighting them. This goes for every law there is in every country, literally. From taxes to a simple traffic…
/r/PussyPassDenied14/06/17 09:51 AM
2

If they are threatening me to steal it then yes. If I catch them breaking into my car, I'm not going to shoot them immediately, but I'm not going to let them continue breaking into my car either. If they try to fight me instead of fucking off then I would shoot them.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/06/17 05:26 AM
0

hahahahahaha sure you aren't
/r/PussyPassDenied14/06/17 04:18 AM
-3

"execute" lmao shooting in self-defense is not execution. You have clearly never been the victim of a violent crime in your life.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/06/17 04:17 AM
1

Don't see many white girls getting brutalized tbh
/r/PussyPassDenied14/06/17 04:15 AM
2

I haven't taken any feminist courses yet, but I did take a philosophy class a couple years ago and it was one of the most helpful and enjoyable classes I've ever taken. Should be a highschool requirement to take philosophy!
/r/MensRights09/01/17 05:50 PM
1

To better understand reality and make better choices. When you say choices, do you mean individually or on a government level? Because my problem with talking about privilege is people tend to want the government to "fix" the differences between people and achieve equality of outcome, which I don't think is necessarily going to make people happier.
/r/MensRights09/01/17 05:42 PM
3

Well if you ever have the time please check out this video of economist Thomas Sowell. It's not long and you may find the research enlightening - it's not so bleak for women! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v_pQ7KXv0o0
/r/MensRights09/01/17 05:35 PM
4

I'm glad you brought up the equality vs equity thing, because it gets at the crux of the issue. I side on the fence of equality of opportunity whereas feminists want equality of outcome. My argument is people should be able to make their own choices and do whatever they think makes them happy. I also think we've already achieved equality, by and large, so if women wanted to be in STEM there's good news - they can be and many already are. To the wage gap - I think different things make people hap…
/r/MensRights09/01/17 05:31 PM
8

Social constructivists make the argument that for example women only dominate nursing or men dominate engineering because it's always been gender stereotyped that way. I don't believe that. The problem with that thinking is they are denying fundamental differences between the sexes and pretending like everything can be fixed if we just force people to choose what they think is the right choice. Then there's the especially misinformed feminists who think the wage gap literally means employers dis…
/r/MensRights09/01/17 05:07 PM
7

Your description of the wage gap is totally false and has been thoroughly disproven. Women are not paid 77% of what men make for the exact job and everything else. Not even close.
/r/MensRights09/01/17 05:04 PM
15

That's your opinion. It's also irrelevant to the point since it's feminists and social constructivists who want legislation to correct what they falsely perceive as social injustice.
/r/MensRights09/01/17 04:57 PM

Just curious, do you think talking about privilege is important? If so, why?
/r/MensRights09/01/17 04:49 PM

The point of the image is that "male privilege", like having a higher average income, is earned. A job that can kill you pays more than being a hairdresser or some other safe job women are more likely to fill. The entire point of the image is to shut up the whiny feminists bitching about male privilege.
/r/MensRights09/01/17 04:27 PM

Maybe the issue is with the idea of masculinity causing these issues Men being men is not an "issue" and masculinity is not a bad thing. Just like women choosing to raise a family instead of pursuing a career aren't making a "wrong" decision. The point of this graphic is to illustrate that men have problems too, and talking about privilege is stupid. Feminists don't get to bitch about "muh wage gap" while they work a safe office job doing clerical work.
/r/MensRights09/01/17 04:23 PM
1

His name? Ben Garrison
/r/PussyPassDenied21/01/16 07:01 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter