TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Youre_So_Pathetic Archive

View 0 posts and 233 comments by Youre_So_Pathetic on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

In the case of TwoX, it's more like thread invasions and downvote brigades. Certain threads are targeted by r/MR when TwoX talks about something MRAs dislike. In other words, MRAs do exactly what they accuse SRS of doing, and have done so for longer than SRS has existed.
/r/MensRights25/02/12 11:21 PM
2

And that has exactly what to do with my month old post? Nothing.
/r/MensRights25/02/12 10:58 PM
0

And no one from the dozens of men's rights websites could afford to go see her? None of the millions? of MRAs out there?
/r/MensRights25/02/12 02:07 AM
0

Right. So why didn't any MRA from the internet go see her speak? You guys always say she should write a book.
/r/MensRights25/02/12 12:38 AM
1

Why one earth would I, as a man who has a really good life, ever want to "rise up" and put my own cushy life at jeopardy? As it stands now, I can do pretty much whatever I want, "rising up" won't get me a single thing that I don't already have.
/r/MensRights24/02/12 08:36 PM
0

And yet MRAs couldn't be bothered to go see her speak in real life.
/r/MensRights24/02/12 08:33 PM
4

It's called positive discrimination.
/r/MensRights21/02/12 04:59 AM
1

and a lot of ppl don't like it. ... Because it is goddamned stupid. Equating war to marriage is incredibly insulting to the veterans who put their lives on the line, and the ones who never made it home, so you could live your cushy little life and make light of their sacrifice as if they fought and bled and died just for your sad political fodder.
/r/MensRights16/02/12 09:15 PM
0

Yeah, as a man I sure hate men!
/r/MensRights15/02/12 04:39 AM
2

This is why when women are granted the right to vote a socialist welfare state ensues. Correlation =/= causation.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 04:48 AM
-2

Trust lost is difficult to regain if it's possible at all. Let me get this straight: you mistrust every female member of your family (sisters, mothers, and grandmothers) because you believe a conspiracy theory? I think you should seek help, this is definitely not healthy behaviour.
/r/MensRights10/02/12 03:45 AM
-5

"Feminists" forgot this? Really?
/r/MensRights10/02/12 03:41 AM
1

I'm too lazy to look, but yes it will.
/r/MensRights08/02/12 10:28 PM
1

As did I, and the comments creeping on the girl, including some that told her she was worth more because she was hot, were highly upvoted in the beginning. By the way, as much as you'd like to pretend otherwise, when it comes to misogyny, assholery, and general shittiness r/atheism is no better than any other mainstream subreddit. The thread we are talking about followed threads of rape jokes on r/atheism.
/r/MensRights08/02/12 09:56 PM
5

Before SRS and Skepchick pointed out the rampant assholes in that thread, all the bad comments were very highly upvoted.
/r/MensRights08/02/12 09:34 PM
8

but I don't agree with the reaction. What's sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander.
/r/MensRights08/02/12 09:22 PM
-1

His butt.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 02:05 AM
-2

Wow, the mod team has a strange view of "trolling." At worst SRS is equally as guilty of trolling as /r/mensrights. At worst.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 02:00 AM
4

Because pretty much every space is a male one. It would be bona fide suppression of free speech to say "no talking about feminism anywhere, everywhere." I know you MRAs are more than in favour of the suppression of feminism. After all, feminists have literally killed millions of people (including causing the fall of ancient Greece, the Roman Empire, and Atlantis,) and feminism is literally Nazism in the MRA mind.
/r/MensRights29/01/12 02:44 AM
8

As far as I know, it's always been that way to some great extent. It would be utterly foolish, and incredibly sexist, to suggest otherwise because it implies that while there are many, many things just for the menz, and not many things at all all about the womenz, this is somehow wrong and how dare there be something just about women! You sound like the type of guy who follows his wife into public bathrooms so he knows what she is doing at all times.
/r/MensRights28/01/12 08:16 AM
5

An SRS member who engages in introspection all the damn time, thank you very much.
/r/MensRights28/01/12 08:12 AM
0

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minority_group Took me three seconds to look this up. Rather than a relational "social group", as the term would indicate, the term refers to a category that is differentiated and defined by the social majority, that is, those who hold the majority of positions of social power in a society. The differentiation can be based on one or more observable human characteristics, including, for example, ethnicity, race, gender, wealth or sexual orientation. Usage of the term …
/r/MensRights27/01/12 11:59 PM
-7

"HEY GUYS! I'M A STUPID MORONIC LITTLE SHIT WHO HAS NO IDEA WHAT THE WORD 'MINORITY' EVEN MEANS! I GUESS I COULD GET SOME SORT OF EDUCATION ON THE MATTER AND LEARN WHAT THE TERM 'MINORITY' MEANS, BUT FUCK EDUCATION, AM I RIGHT? I LOVE BEING AN INTELLECTUALLY STUNTED, ANTI-EDUCATION LITTLE PIECE OF HUMAN GARBAGE!"
/r/MensRights27/01/12 11:00 PM
14

It's called "derailment." It's when you take a topic and flood it with people and replies that derail the original topic so it can't get discussed, or turn the message into something completely different, and often completely contrary to the original message. As a consequence of r/mensrights being full of nearly 30 thousand evangelizing MRAs and r/feminism being barely more than 4 thousand readers you get this kind of stuff all the time. r/mensrights can invade r/feminism at any time and complet…
/r/MensRights27/01/12 10:57 PM
5

SCORE! I knew all those years of white knighting would pay off!
/r/MensRights30/12/11 09:35 PM
8

You're still popular with me. <3
/r/MensRights30/12/11 07:52 PM
4

Wooooooooo! TOP 100 PARTY!!!!
/r/MensRights30/12/11 07:44 PM
7

I'm one of the 100 most active users? I feel so much pride! :D I accept this award on behalf of the over 7,000 SRSers out there, you guys are awesome! I never could have done it without you! I'd like to thank my mom and dad for raising me right; my ex-girlfriends, who I am still friends with; I'd like to thank the Academy; the Butt-cademy; butthurt bots who hate SRS but actually make it bigger all the time; and finally, I would like to thank SRS_lol for being such an ass, you will forever remain…
/r/MensRights30/12/11 07:41 PM
7

You've got my vote in November!
/r/MensRights30/12/11 07:36 PM
4

I VOLUNTEER TO BE CASTRATED THEN BURIED ALIVE!!!
/r/MensRights30/12/11 07:31 PM
0

You're the one who brought up AnnArchist.
/r/MensRights28/12/11 07:54 PM
3

Perhaps you can come up with a more elegant term for a man who is comfortable with the gender he was born with?
/r/MensRights28/12/11 07:46 PM
27

Best ragequit since CEO_The_Human_Fund!
/r/MensRights27/12/11 10:07 PM
1

My point was that he, as a heterosexual white male, was defining what he thinks feminism is. He never once used an outside source to assist in his definition. He never once quoted a feminist or allowed women to define what feminism is, he was pushing his view of what feminism is on us. How can I take his definition at face value when he seems to have a vested interest in demonizing feminism? I thin k his definition is, at best, hopelessly biased, at worst a complete fabrication intended to make …
/r/MensRights27/12/11 07:54 AM
1

Thank you, this is an awesome post. :)
/r/MensRights26/12/11 08:12 PM
1

Well, why is pink for girls and blue for boys? Why do girls play with dolls and boys play with legos? Why do boys like trucks and girls like doll houses?
/r/MensRights26/12/11 07:12 AM
1

No. This was the claim made by the guy in the video. Gender isn't innate, sex is however. Let me counter your interesting anecdote with one of my own. Brain scans of some transgender people have shown the opposite brain sex traits as the sex they were born as. It's thus believed that some transgender people were born with one sex for their body and another for their brain. This is on top of weird genetic things like XY females and the like.
/r/MensRights26/12/11 05:33 AM
2

Yeah, exactly, so even with sex there are multiple biological determinations. This whole thing isn't just cut and dry.
/r/MensRights26/12/11 04:18 AM
1

Gender isn't genetic. Sex is however. Hey GWW, would you are say that you are incapable of logic because you weren't bathed with the right hormones in the womb?
/r/MensRights26/12/11 03:55 AM
3

I imagine it is a combination of both biology and society. Claiming otherwise seems pretty foolish to me.
/r/MensRights25/12/11 11:38 PM
4

Dude, you sound like you let your politics determine your science, rather than the other way around. No one who let their science inform the issues would use loaded terms like "leftist." Yes, there is a major scientific element to this topic but it gets hijacked by political ideologues, which is very sad indeed. No, you are denouncing the science because it doesn't conform to your political beliefs.
/r/MensRights25/12/11 11:32 PM
6

I like how he jams as many dog whistle and loaded words into his screed as he can. It totally makes him look completely, and utterly and without question objective. Holy fuck, he actually says that "logic" is a male trait caused by hormones. What the fuck? Also, the idiot doesn't realize that they are on the trail of a "gay gene" (though it is more likely a combination of genes,) and that there is solid evidence that orientation is genetic.
/r/MensRights25/12/11 11:24 PM
3

I never admitted to anything. Your claims about my gender and profession were so stupid that I simply ignored them.
/r/MensRights23/12/11 12:14 AM
5

Yeah, because that's why I'm calling you deluded, and not because of your completely nonsensical view of the world.
/r/MensRights22/12/11 11:50 PM
5

So much delusion packed into such a small comment.
/r/MensRights22/12/11 11:38 PM
2

Why would I counter "an argument" that has nothing to do with the original subject? Nice attempt at a derailment there buddy.
/r/MensRights20/12/11 08:55 AM
1

Every fact has been checked by respectable news organisation, or is on the public record. So because your anecdotes come from a trusted source (like the Daily Mail?? LOL!!!) they somehow escape the realm of "anecdote," and enter the realm of "universal fact?" You're a pretty shitty scientist, aren't you? But then, all you have been doing in this discussion is making circular claims that only feminists can define feminism Actually, I think my argument was more like: You define feminism to suit yo…
/r/MensRights20/12/11 08:51 AM
-2

Why did you respond to my request with something that has absolutely nothing to do with the question that I asked? Don't even bother replying to me if all you're going to do is spout a non sequitur.
/r/MensRights19/12/11 05:59 PM
2

I see, so you run with anecdotes and cherry picked "facts" and call it iron-clad evidence. Now that I have eviscerated your initial argument, I think you'll agree that the rest is moot. All you've done is shown me how intellectually dishonest you really are. You seem to completely lack self-awareness of this fact as well. I honestly expect an answer to each and every one of my questions. It'll show me how intellectually honest and self aware you are. In other words you can't do this at all.
/r/MensRights19/12/11 05:26 PM
5

Linked back to a r/mensrights post... Why am I not surprised? By linking back to a r/MR post, you are letting an MRA define feminism. All you are doing is putting words in the collective mouth of a group whose views, while logical and internally consistent, make you personally uncomfortable so that you can subsequently dismiss the group as a whole as a very juvenile way to address your personal shortcomings. Tell me, can you define feminism using the words of feminists to define their own moveme…
/r/MensRights19/12/11 02:20 PM
-1

Putting words in the collective mouth of a group whose views, while logical and internally consistent, make you personally uncomfortable so that you can subsequently dismiss the group as a whole is a very juvenile way to address your personal shortcomings. Holy fuck. You just described the men's rights movement to a T without any trace of irony whatsoever. Please, define feminism for me. Do it in such a way that makes your definition supportable by what feminists (mainstream, not fringe) themsel…
/r/MensRights19/12/11 02:06 PM
-2

Care to provide evidence that what you think feminism is is actually what it is? In other words, are you actually attempting to define something you know shit-all about? Similarly, many feminists use "mysogony" or "sexism" as a code word for "men" so they can say misandrist shit without getting called on it. Well, except the part where this makes no sense since "misogyny" and "sexism" are actions or behaviours, not groups of people. Feminism isn't a singular coherent philosophy. Then how were yo…
/r/MensRights19/12/11 01:41 PM
-7

No, I think you MRAs project awfulness on feminism that simply isn't there or is in the fringe. Nothing is wrong with feminism, on the whole feminism is a positive philosophy and as a movement has made positive changes to society. I think you've set up a straw man feminism as an enemy to hate and blame for when things go wrong, and many MRAs use "feminism" as a code word for "women" so they can say misogynistic shit without ever getting called on it. It is contrary to say that there are "good" p…
/r/MensRights19/12/11 07:40 AM
-2

Funny how "I was just following orders" was considered to not be a legitimate defence during the Nuremberg Trials. It makes even less sense since calling yourself a "feminist" is an entirely voluntary enterprise.
/r/MensRights19/12/11 07:08 AM
-1

there are "good feminists" but there isn't a "good feminism." This objectively does not make sense.
/r/MensRights19/12/11 06:40 AM
1

That depends on how much I get to shame and degrade you.
/r/MensRights19/12/11 06:18 AM
1

I think we broke the bots yesterday... I tried to get one of them to reply to you to show you what I mean about the bots following every link in SRS (even posted in comments) so people could see exactly when SRS talks about their comments.
/r/MensRights19/12/11 02:38 AM
1

Let me show you an example.
/r/MensRights18/12/11 05:27 AM
1

That's how you know you've been linked to by SRS, not downvotes.
/r/MensRights18/12/11 02:20 AM
6

If their beliefs are that indefensible, then they should be quite simple to refute and ignore. This kind of tactic makes it seem like the exact opposite is true.
/r/MensRights18/12/11 02:18 AM
1

Uhhh... So the Canadian authorities are going to prosecute people who live outside of Canada for violating hate speech laws outside of Canada? Are you not seeing how stupid this assertion is? For example, Border Services prevented the Westboro Baptist people from entering the country to protest a funeral, but no Canadian authority has ever gone to Kansas to arrest Fred Phelps.
/r/MensRights18/12/11 01:42 AM
1

No... There are bots that post SRS links to the comments that are linked to via SRS.
/r/MensRights17/12/11 02:10 PM
0

Actually, if a pathetic bot posted a link back to SRS then it was probably SRS. But you keep that paranoia alive, it's a vital part of being an MRA after all.
/r/MensRights17/12/11 09:33 AM
6

Just so you know, if the website isn't based in Canada then it is not violating any Canadian hate speech laws.
/r/MensRights17/12/11 08:24 AM
10

It's really no surprise these whackjobs made you a mod in their whackjob subreddit.
/r/MensRights17/12/11 08:20 AM
11

And anyone who posted or looked at r/jailbait.
/r/MensRights17/12/11 07:58 AM
16

Holy fuck, you people are fucked up. "I disagree with so so I'll put your personal information on the internet for everyone to see!" I guess you guys know you don't have legitimate counterpoints to their arguments, so the only way you can win is by silencing them. You people are fucked right up.
/r/MensRights17/12/11 07:54 AM
0

I insinuated "always?" I wasn't aware that I was saying "probably means always" when I said "probably means probably." No, that's you putting words into my mouth again. You aren't very honest, are you? You're pretty dense aren't you? You said: If your post is getting downvoted on r/mensrights, it's probably because of the feminist downvote brigade in r/shitredditsays. I guess you weren't aware that "probably" mean "probable." Now you're trying to weasel out of this by saying that anyone who poin…
/r/MensRights16/12/11 05:57 AM
39

You forget that the ancient Greeks, Romans, and Atlantis was destroyed by feminists. The number is probably closer to the billions.
/r/MensRights16/12/11 02:33 AM
2

Thanks for conceding the argument to me.
/r/MensRights16/12/11 02:30 AM
1

I like how you put words into my mouth and completely ignored your own fallacious reasoning. You sure are a paragon of intellectual honesty, aren't you?
/r/MensRights15/12/11 09:06 PM
2

You must be terrible at the English language because "probably" means "probably," not "maybe" or "sometimes." Nice attempt to weasel out of your original message though.
/r/MensRights15/12/11 08:56 PM
5

It was a great novel, too bad you've never read it.
/r/MensRights15/12/11 08:49 PM
2

I guess you missed that big uproar where three trolls got banned from r/MR. I guess you missed the part where people are given "troll" flair in r/MR. If your post is getting downvoted on r/mensrights, it's probably because of the feminist downvote brigade in r/shitredditsays. So you never said this now?
/r/MensRights15/12/11 08:41 PM
2

Then what's the purpose of this post? Persecution complex? So you can dismiss people who disagree with you? Trying to make this subreddit even more insular? Funny how a subreddit of 6,000 can be blamed for all the downvotes ever received in a subreddit of 28,000 people.
/r/MensRights15/12/11 08:29 PM
2

You must be confused, I was saying that saying shit like "unfuckable feminists" is the exact type of thing SRS takes issue with. It's an ad hominem attack, it's a stupid insult, it's a generalization of an entire group of people, and it shows your lack of respect. You demand respect from us while spewing crap like this? You're a hypocrite.
/r/MensRights15/12/11 07:56 PM
0

No, you object to my free speech to call you out for your shitty free speech. What's sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander, and I have the right to exercise my free speech as much as you do. You love free speech when it agrees with you, you hate it and start witch hunt threads when you disagree with it.
/r/MensRights15/12/11 07:36 PM
1

Cry more, manginas. I don't think we need your type defending SRS.
/r/MensRights15/12/11 07:30 PM
1

but the unfuckable feminists thing is true. Sigh... This is why SRS takes issue with you and you have a persecution complex about it?
/r/MensRights15/12/11 07:29 PM
2

Fuck of MRAs trying to manufacture false accusations. The hypocrisy, it is crushing me!
/r/MensRights15/12/11 07:28 PM
0

Wow, that is just so fucked up. Mens rights is an echo chamber. They will do anything possible to silence dissent. Mens rights can only exist in an echo chamber.
/r/MensRights15/12/11 07:24 PM
1

Downvoted for the truth. How dare other groups not bow to the superior opinions of MRAs!
/r/MensRights15/12/11 07:14 PM
2

Shut up you dirty leftist!!!!!
/r/MensRights11/12/11 05:45 AM
0

SRS believes ignatiusloyola is one of the better men's rights posters because of his far left stance. What?
/r/MensRights10/12/11 04:18 AM
-2

Yes, you very much are mistaken. Nice try though.
/r/MensRights06/12/11 07:57 PM
-2

I consider the constant trivialization of circumcision, along with other men's right's issues, a sign of bigotry. ...Says the guy from the subreddit that thinks that feminists are the worst thing ever. How can you seriously expect anyone to take these issues seriously when they come loaded with payloads of hate towards feminists and women? You've poisoned your own message and I think it's pure hubris to try to claim the outright dismissal of the MRM is some sort of bigotry.
/r/MensRights06/12/11 07:35 PM
-2

Find me bigotry in SRS.
/r/MensRights06/12/11 07:10 PM
-6

I think you need to look up the definition of bigotry. You seem blissfully ignorant of the correct meaning.
/r/MensRights06/12/11 10:13 AM
-2

Bigotry is groupthink now? Funny, I thought groupthink was groupthink and bigotry was showing bigoted opinions towards certain groups.
/r/MensRights06/12/11 10:10 AM
0

Wait, when has anyone on SRS ever blamed all Christians for a nutjob firebombs an abortion clinic?
/r/MensRights06/12/11 10:08 AM
-3

I have actually seen some feminists argue that No, no you haven't.
/r/MensRights06/12/11 10:04 AM
1

If a magazine for men had on the cover: "20 Ways To Make Her Squirm Like A Fish"....there would be a national outrage. I agree. This is because society views women's sexuality as something disgusting to be hidden. You can have stories about giant veiny penises ejaculating buckets of spooge on the cover of a magazine for women and no one bats an eyelash. Male sexuality is seen as normal and healthy. Female sexuality is seen as abnormal and gross.
/r/MensRights02/12/11 07:43 PM
1

A word invented by women tired of men telling them how they think and feel. I call it "projection" since feminists have pretty much done the exact same thing for decades now. I wasn't aware it was bad for women to express how they think and feel about stuff that pertains to them.
/r/MensRights01/12/11 03:31 AM
-5

And you obviously have no clue what the word "patriarchy" even means.
/r/MensRights27/11/11 11:20 PM
4

Mansplaining - a term used to marginalize input from men. Wrong. You should learn the definitions of words before you try to define them yourselves. Mansplaining is when a man tries to "explain" to women what they think and feel and how the world works while ignoring everything women are telling him. So, mansplaining is exactly the opposite of what you claim, it is men ignoring the voices of women. Patriarchy - a nonexistent, statistically unsupported concept that feminists use to blame men for …
/r/MensRights27/11/11 05:42 AM
1

Did you read the part where his citation was ripped to shreds?
/r/MensRights25/11/11 08:16 AM
4

You are an MRA, right? You obviously don't give a shit about the MRM since you aren't even willing to spend 5 minutes backing up your claims with evidence.
/r/MensRights25/11/11 08:14 AM
0

I would love to see all 5 thousand of your facts please.
/r/MensRights25/11/11 08:07 AM
1

Oh, I see, you live in the land of "ought to be." I thought everyone was guaranteed life, liberty and the security of their person. After all, this is a basic code outlined in constitutions the world over--meaning it is the highest law of the land. But no, I guess you're right. We should be fully resigned to have crimes committed against us constantly because That's The Way The World Works (TM).
/r/MensRights21/11/11 03:01 AM
3

No, it shouldn't be part of what anybody signed up for. Stalking someone online or in real life with the aim to make their lives miserable is plain wrong and bad. You are endorsing this horrible behaviour as well.
/r/MensRights20/11/11 01:32 AM
3

The only people who are laughing at that are those who think it's fun to stalk and harass people. I'll bet you'd sing a different tune if you were put in the exact same situation.
/r/MensRights18/11/11 10:37 PM
2

This is all sorts of fucked up.
/r/MensRights18/11/11 10:35 PM
3

No, the word is "elitist," it means you think only certain people who you arbitrarily decide are better than everyone else get time and money.
/r/MensRights18/11/11 02:46 AM
2

That blog you quoted is incredibly incredibly elitist. I'm not sure how anyone with even an ounce of egalitarianism in them would ever be able to quote such an elitist piece of crap with a straight face.
/r/MensRights16/11/11 11:51 AM
3

I think /r/MR was officially outed as the toilet it has always been the same time AnnArchist was made a mod.
/r/MensRights13/11/11 11:02 PM
6

Yes. It assumes that the male party is a command authority who can order the female party to do whatever he wishes. His command is to do what is considered stereotypical "woman's work" (i.e. cooking.) It makes the assumption that the female party belongs in a kitchen instead of, say, in a laboratory, on a construction site, in a boardroom, or in a space shuttle. Finally, it ignores all the wants, wishes, desires, dreams and opinions of the female party. She is just someone to be ordered around b…
/r/MensRights10/11/11 11:15 AM
6

I never said anything about the person saying the sandwich joke, I'm saying that the joke itself is inherently misogynistic.
/r/MensRights10/11/11 09:48 AM
11

Yeah, and words and actions can show a hatred of women, not just someone's intentions.
/r/MensRights10/11/11 04:41 AM
16

Not misogyny: Bad taste jokes about rape/abuse/etc. Logic. Counterarguments. Disagreements. Harsh language. Saying cunt. Saying bitch. Calling women names. Being pro-life. Calling every woman who accuses a man of rape a liar. You do realize these things can be symptoms of hatred for women or even promote hatred for women, right? In other words, the only way these are not misogyny is if your first point of what is misogyny is wrong. I also suspect that your definition of "logic" is really flawed.
/r/MensRights10/11/11 04:25 AM
3

Actually, prison rape is never, ever funny. You have a pretty terrible sense of humour.
/r/MensRights03/11/11 06:13 PM
41

Apparently, r/shitredditsays really is a down-vote/censor brigade because they had my comment removed by the mods. Or maybe it was because you are, you know, posting personal information.
/r/MensRights02/11/11 08:10 PM
0

Nope, just pointing out that it isn't the universally acclaimed feminist play that you seem to think it is and that it received criticism from many feminists and was forced to self-censor. You constantly bringing it up is a straw man. Also why weren't you outraged at /r/jailbait?
/r/MensRights01/11/11 12:04 AM
-1

The Vagina Monologues has been criticized by a number of people in the pro-sex feminist, gender egalitarian, and individualist feminist movements. In "The Little Coochie Snorcher that Could", an underage girl (thirteen in earlier performances, sixteen in the revised version) recounts being given alcohol and then having sex with an adult woman; the incident is recalled fondly by the grown girl, who in the original version of the play calls it "a good rape." Her abuser is also portrayed positively…
/r/MensRights31/10/11 02:30 AM
4

That's true, you've got me there.
/r/MensRights31/10/11 02:24 AM
6

and surely, most people would never imply that 'yes always mean yes'. Why not? You're telling me that there are times when a hot and horny woman says "yes" to wanting sex with you that you'd take it to mean "no" and stop? What planet are you from?
/r/MensRights31/10/11 01:51 AM
19

Congratulations /r/MR, you guys are creepy rape apologists!
/r/MensRights31/10/11 01:47 AM
0

In case you are not a troll, "creep-shaming" is considered a male analogue of "slut-shaming." Nope, it isn't even close to being the same thing.
/r/MensRights25/10/11 06:39 AM
-2

but mostly to spite these foreskin-worshiping hippies. Agreed 100%!
/r/MensRights11/10/11 07:10 AM
0

My evidence: the fact /mr and that MRAs exists at all. If the men weren't denigrated as 2nd class citizens in the first place none of this would be necessary. Nice bit of circular reasoning there!
/r/MensRights09/10/11 03:30 AM
1

Louis CK talks about this exact subject.
/r/MensRights06/10/11 04:02 AM
9

You have a strange concept of what constitutes "men," since I've seen women in almost every profession you listed. I've seen women in the army, as janitors, as fire fighters, as police, I've met many women who work in saw mills and pulp mills. I've never met a miner so I can't comment on that one.
/r/MensRights04/10/11 08:55 AM
2

Oh, I totally agree. Every MRA should get a vasectomy.
/r/MensRights27/09/11 06:34 AM
0

Exactly. This post is nothing but ineffectual whining. If the OP is so worried about homeless men in his city, then why the fuck isn't he at least floating the idea of starting a "Men's Housing March?" Put your money where you mouth is.
/r/MensRights26/09/11 05:34 AM
2

Yeah, you're so right.
/r/MensRights25/09/11 06:52 AM
6

I'd hate to see how you guys treat women who DISagree with you. Pretty much the exact same way they treat women that agree with them. I've seen them crucify more than one woman who had the gall to agree with them and post here.
/r/MensRights23/09/11 07:06 AM
5

I'm pretty sure it was neither, rather it was a flaw in thinking.
/r/MensRights23/09/11 06:57 AM
8

WARNING: THIS IS WHAT SOME MRAS REALLY BELIEVE.
/r/MensRights21/09/11 12:59 PM
6

I find that generally the MRA community does police itself quite well Bwahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!!!!!
/r/MensRights21/09/11 12:54 PM
0

The difference being that many things said here and by the new mod are actually downright hate filled. That's what hate speech is by the way, speech that expresses hatred towards certain groups.
/r/MensRights20/09/11 04:38 PM
1

Wow, you guys take another step backwards. I'm eager to see who you smear as "trolls."
/r/MensRights19/09/11 11:21 PM
-5

Yeah, because being against more rights for the group with the most rights is totally as sexist as the other way around.
/r/MensRights19/09/11 11:15 PM
6

Sorry, not buying the misogyny angle, stop crying over the guy. Of course you don't. If this was the case, downvotes would happen at a sustained rate over time. And you measure downvotes over time for everything that gets posted here on /r/MR? I seriously doubt that. You know that you do it, stop trying to explain it away. To a certain extent that is what happens, but it wouldn't even be possible to downvote comments in /r/MR is at least a sizable portion of the /r/MR community didn't agree. Als…
/r/MensRights19/09/11 04:40 AM
10

Everything you posted is in the home Reddit for Men's Rights, idiot Yeah, every single one of those threads is a /r/MR downvoting squad thread where you try to steer the discussions on Reddit to your own ends. The analogue would be for MRA's to have a sub-Reddit where all they do is post quotes they disagree with, circle jerk and spew downvotes through multiple accounts to skew and disrupt dialogue within another sub-Reddit. I think your persecution complex is showing. /r/MR isn't the only place…
/r/MensRights19/09/11 04:35 AM
8

Known by who? Everyone capable of clicking his username and looking through his comment history. There is no way a sub-Reddit with 10% of the readership of Men's Rights can derail a discussion with a flurry disproportionate downvotes and no concomitant replies. Exactly, then have you ever considered that shock horror gasp a large portion of those who frequent /r/MR agree that comments that SRS attack are indeed misogynistic and wrong? Holy shit! What a fucking novel thought! Of course, the concl…
/r/MensRights19/09/11 04:30 AM
14

The MRA doctrine is equality. Says the guy with the subreddit modded by a known misogynist. What we do not do, is surreptitiously try to skew the internal discussion of other sub-Reddits and downvote valid points without comment because we are insecure. That's funny. No, that's exactly what you do. How about I provide examples: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/kjkzh/you_really_like_to_hear_yourself_talk_its_a/ http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/kjmfw/xpost_from_raskreddit_i_a…
/r/MensRights19/09/11 04:07 AM
-4

Nice, I like how you dismiss concerns instead of actually addressing them. /r/MR has such a great mod team. By the way, I only post this because I'm actually (believe it or not) trying to help you. If I had malicious intent I would be gleefully waiting for the next time someone proclaimed "we are not misogynist here in /r/MR!" so I could throw a bunch of obviously misogynistic quotes from a /r/MR moderator back in their face to show them how /r/MR apparently really feels. I thought you guys had …
/r/MensRights19/09/11 03:14 AM
36

Which is hilarious since /r/MR acts like it's own downvote brigade and has no qualms about spreading the MRM doctrine throughout Reddit with the click of a downvote arrow. Upvoted for partial truth by the way. At the very least SRS is aware of what we are. It's called "introspection." They make Reddit a worse place. Yeah, because pointing out blatant racism and sexism on Reddit is such a horrible and terrible thing to do. God forbid that those suggesting we euthanize babies from poor families, t…
/r/MensRights19/09/11 02:43 AM
-9

That is sexist hate speech. That's an incredibly broad definition of "sexist hate speech" you've got there. Almost as if it was designed to prevent criticism and shut people up instead of being a viable definition. But then again, you are the mod who chose a sexist douchebag to be a /r/MR mod, so why am I not surprised.
/r/MensRights19/09/11 02:40 AM
-2

Go figure that /r/MR would appoint a known misogynist to the role of moderator. From now on, you guys do not have a leg to stand on when you claim "we're not misogynist!" because you have mods who very much are. Congratulations on devolving /r/MR, now no one will ever take you seriously ever again.
/r/MensRights19/09/11 02:29 AM
18

the left side of the aisle diminishes rights and resists progress I'm not sure how anyone can say this with a straight face.
/r/MensRights17/09/11 10:27 PM
2

You can find that gem of an argument here. By the way, this guy has no idea how the criminal justice system works, has no idea how criminology works, and has no idea how law works. He decided to argue something out of ignorance because he's an awesome armchair lawyer. He ignored evidence provided to him and instead provided his own Wall Street Journal article that was obviously written with the intention to criticize Obama. By the way, I find the accusation of ad hominem to be especially hilario…
/r/MensRights15/09/11 09:19 PM
-2

[citation needed] I gave you citations. As a rabid man-hating misandrist, you would like this to be true, I'm absolutely aware of that, but you and your sexist kyriarchal ilk have a lot more work to do before the courts overturn Blackstone and the 250 years of equal protection jurisprudence written since. I like how you know absolutely nothing about me and you've already made assumptions and jumped to conclusions about me. I have no opinion of Obama, the Wall Street Journal, Rupert Murdoch or Fo…
/r/MensRights15/09/11 12:13 AM
-2

It most certainly does apply. You cannot sentence the guilty for crimes they have not committed, which is exactly what you are defending when you cite recidivism as a factor in parole. Do you have any counterargument at all, or just an abundance of lazy ad hominem? See? You have no idea whatsoever about what you are talking about. Parole only kicks in after the parolee has served his/her sentence to the point where he/she is eligible for parole. A parole board does not "sentence" anybody to anyt…
/r/MensRights14/09/11 11:46 PM
9

Referring to women by their sexual organs? I'll bet anything that you're the type of guy who thinks calling a man a "dick" is misandrist.
/r/MensRights14/09/11 11:07 PM
-6

You do know what the presumption of innocence is right? You do know that this is determined in a court of law and does not apply to a parole board, right? I can tell by the way you argue that you actually have no clue about the law, the criminal justice system, and criminology. I don't really care if you are ignorant of those things or not, but why are you arguing about stuff you are obviously ignorant about? Blah blah blah blah, damn republikrats. I'm Canadian, I'm not a "republikrats." I lean …
/r/MensRights14/09/11 10:54 PM
14

the Gashes And I see the claim that /r/MR isn't misogynistic all the fucking time.
/r/MensRights14/09/11 10:44 PM
25

This is completely depraved.
/r/MensRights14/09/11 10:29 PM
-6

You do know what recidivism rates are right? You do know that they are a valuable tool used by criminologists and the criminal justice system to determine the likelihood of an offender re-offending, right? You do know they are based on statistical fact, not numbers pull out of an ass, right? By the way, I like how you linked to a Wall Street Journal right-wing article written to bash Obama whereas I linked to a report prepared for the U.S. Department of Justice that contains actual facts. Your r…
/r/MensRights14/09/11 10:14 PM
1

It's pretty sad that you hate women so much that you can't even spell the word "women" correctly.
/r/MensRights14/09/11 09:01 PM
-3

It is because the recidivism rate for women prisoners is lower than for men. Thus, it is pure logic to let women out of prison first. I just hope they do give the same deal to the men eventually. The American prison population is out of control.
/r/MensRights14/09/11 08:39 PM
1

I guess the ~3 women you once dated a long time ago totally = the 3.5 billion women on the planet.
/r/MensRights12/09/11 05:04 AM
0

The MRM is issues-based, not ideology based. Bwahahahahahahahahaaaa!!!
/r/MensRights12/09/11 03:56 AM
16

I don't have any problem with people being who they are, but I do have a problem with feminist society telling them they should be someone they're not I have a problem with you and your ilk telling me what I'm supposed to be. I'm not allowed to act "like a woman," express emotions, like certain types of movies, or care about certain things because it's not "manly" and doing so isn't what a "real man" does. unable to learn the self-reliance and other qualities that define most men. See? There you…
/r/MensRights12/09/11 02:29 AM
16

Men are not attracted to success in women. Speak for yourself dude. I like a woman who has lofty goals for her career and actively works towards them. I want the woman I marry to earn the equivalent of my wages, or better. Why? Because then I know she can get shit done and I don't have to work nearly as hard to earn a comfortable living. Women are not attracted to beauty in men. Hahahahahaha! This is demonstrably false in every way. The difference is that women tend to not view men simply as sex…
/r/MensRights10/09/11 04:15 AM
0

So which is it? Representative of this subreddit, or the victim of an AMR downvote brigade? By the way, I upvoted it. I hate to see pathetic Reddit comments below the viewing threshold. I want the world to see how bigoted people on Reddit can be.
/r/MensRights09/09/11 03:21 PM
3

And if the accused believes it was consensual then they are not guilty. Again, that isn't how mens rea works. You are not "not guilty" if you don't think you did anything illegal, that's not how the law works.
/r/MensRights09/09/11 03:11 PM
2

You have no idea what mens rea means. By the way, why are you taking the Latin law term literally? By your definition of mens rea sociopaths are completely free from the law because they don't have "guilty minds" for their crimes. Are you aware that you are also ignoring the most important part of criminal law: Actus reus? If the victim can prove rape (rape kit, witnesses, physical evidence, etc, etc.) then no amount of shouting mens rea will exonerate you. Just by admitting you had sex with the…
/r/MensRights09/09/11 02:17 PM
2

No... You seem to think it is a magic wild card that means that someone gets off free for whatever crime they committed if you can prove they unknowingly did it. That is not how it works in the real world. I'm sorry, but you're just a rape apologist twisting legal terms to make them mean what you think they should mean. You can't even read a Wikipedia page and get the facts straight!
/r/MensRights09/09/11 01:53 PM
4

It means that there are different classes of crimes based on whether someone knowingly, willingly, or unknowingly and unwillingly committed a crime. No where in the world does mens rea mean that you can claim to be ignorant of the facts of a case and then get off scott free. If I could prove to the court convincingly that I did not know that pulling the trigger of that pistol would cause that pistol to fire and blow my buddy's brains out it means I'll get jail time for manslaughter instead of fi…
/r/MensRights09/09/11 01:40 PM
-1

The whole MRM is one giant, paranoid, pathetic conspiracy theory. Anyone who doesn't agree fervently with all your insane and unfounded idea is a "man hater'" "misandrist," "feminist," "mangina" or an uphold of the "gynocracy." Anyone who does agree fervently with your insane and unfounded ideas but happens to be a different gender is harassed and called the exact same things. You see a vast "feminist" conspiracy to keep men down where ever you look, but when pressed can never provide solid evid…
/r/MensRights09/09/11 12:17 PM
0

I upvoted him so his comment wouldn't be hidden so people could see all the pathetic shit on Reddit.
/r/MensRights09/09/11 07:09 AM
2

I don't think you know what mens rea means.
/r/MensRights09/09/11 06:46 AM
1

your a feminist My a feminist what?
/r/MensRights02/09/11 03:06 AM
1

Oh God noooo! Don't call me a feminist! Why??? WHYY?????
/r/MensRights30/08/11 10:18 PM
1

"Your" definitely pathetic.
/r/MensRights30/08/11 08:56 PM
1

You are so damn pathetic you make me weep.
/r/MensRights30/08/11 07:57 PM
1

I disagree with a few of the points, but overall that manifesto is that of very enlightened and humane group. And you'd have to be some sort of caveman to disagree with most of it.
/r/MensRights30/08/11 07:19 AM
1

The Salvation Army has gained a lot of respect in my eyes after reading your post.
/r/MensRights30/08/11 02:42 AM
1

Um its the way hateful feminists think dumbass No, it's the way blatant trolls who are very obviously trolling /r/MR think. The fact that you seem to think this is real says more about your skewed perspective than anything else.
/r/MensRights30/08/11 02:13 AM
1

When it comes from you, crossposted from this subreddit, "to see what their reaction would be" it is nothing more than trolling. You know this very well, so stop trying to split hairs. You didn't want an honest conversation, you wanted to troll.
/r/MensRights18/08/11 04:21 AM
2

Because "money" is just so much more important than human life or the quality of that life.
/r/MensRights18/08/11 02:58 AM
2

It was very, very obviously troll bait.
/r/MensRights18/08/11 01:04 AM
-2

why are you against men's rights? Because we men have all the rights. We have historically been, and still are the most powerful social class on the planet (assuming you are white male Western.) I've been to third world countries, I've seen how people who are not nearly as affluent, powerful or free as us live, and I can understand the female perspective of constantly and always being judged based on their sexuality rather than their ability, actions, thoughts and feelings. It's called "empathy"…
/r/MensRights18/08/11 12:43 AM
0

kloo2yoo is a woman. False. It's amusing that this rumour still goes around.
/r/MensRights17/08/11 09:57 AM
-3

Am I wrong thinking that feminists are against MR's because of the privileges and power over men they stand to lose? Yes, you are absolutely wrong. Why? Because the opposite is actually true. The MRM is an entirely reactionary movement where men attempt to maintain the control over women that they have historically exercised as women finally start to gain real equality with men. Just look at how the people in this very forum have set up a straw man of what they see as the evil man-hating feminis…
/r/MensRights17/08/11 09:46 AM
1

I just watched the members of this pathetic subreddit crucify a woman who agreed with them simply because she was female (hint: it just happened in this very thread.) No, I don't think this subreddit is at all welcoming to women. Further, I think that anyone who believes this subreddit is welcoming to women must be really quite deluded.
/r/MensRights17/08/11 06:57 AM
-5

They have full right to ban a submission that is very clearly troll-bait and upvoted solely by /r/MR.
/r/MensRights17/08/11 05:58 AM
1

The modern woman is more likened to a concubine then a wife historically. Wives in the past and in other cultures are/were responsible for a considerable amount of the productive utility of the household. I hope that you realize that people in modern times are able to live lives that require a whole lot less labour because of industrialization. I hope you realize that the mechanization of modern society means that everyone, men and women, have a lot more leisure time on their hands because they …
/r/MensRights17/08/11 03:34 AM
0

Thinking very obvious blatant trolling is the way real people think? Yep, this subreddit is a joke.
/r/MensRights17/08/11 03:23 AM
1

You're the one who has no clue about how shelters work. You think "non-profit" means "no paid employees" when such an assertion is completely false.
/r/MensRights17/08/11 01:14 AM
2

Hahahaha, I just think he's amusing because he seems to rile people up quite a bit sometimes.
/r/MensRights16/08/11 11:44 PM
-18

Really? So men don't see women as sexual objects? Men don't look at porn? Men don't think "she's pretty" when they see a woman walking down the street? Men don't go to strip clubs? Men hate one night stands? It is an observable fact that men see women as sexual objects. I know this personally because I am a man and I'm just as guilty as any other man for doing this.
/r/MensRights14/08/11 03:57 PM
-5

I won't deny that I've been rude and insulting, but I tried to be reasonable in my original post. My original post was then downvoted and flooded with people who very obviously missed the point of what this article is saying and what I was saying. They missed the point mainly because A) they assumed that I am a woman, thus my opinion means jack and shit, B) because they obviously never read what I wrote and are still responding to the OP's cherry picked quote, and C) because they took what was w…
/r/MensRights14/08/11 01:52 PM
-5

You can't be serious...
/r/MensRights14/08/11 01:45 PM
-2

Oh yeah, my male privilege makes it impossible for me to see misandry. Why don't you point out exactly where I've been misandrist? My gender is male by the way. I like how you jump to conclusions about my gender because I pointed out that the OP took a quote out of context to attempt to vilify feminists. A feminist has no way of knowing whether any particular statement I am making is because of my experience as a white, as a man, as a texan, as an only child, as a homeowner, as an american, as a…
/r/MensRights14/08/11 01:44 PM
0

I ,live in Canada too, and every shelter in my city is run by paid people who make shitty wages. From people I've spoken to who are social workers or work in that system almost every shelter in Canada is staffed by paid employees. Part of the reason for this is because the majority of homeless in Canada are drug users (we have far fewer mentally ill and veterans who are homeless, unlike the U.S. Heck, we have far fewer homeless people than the U.S.) and it is a dangerous job working in shelters …
/r/MensRights14/08/11 01:33 PM
-2

Since I am a man, the same burden that would fall on a woman in this community does not fall on me. Or are you telling me you missed the point of that article as well?
/r/MensRights14/08/11 01:28 PM
2

No, I'm not. Though I'm a great admirer of his excellent work.
/r/MensRights14/08/11 01:27 PM
-3

Yes, this is true. However, the point of that section of the article is that men sometimes cannot properly understand what is and isn't misogynistic simply because we aren't women and don't have the correct frame of reference to fully understand how women feel and perceive the world. Men can very much learn to become sensitive to misogyny, it is possible for any human being to place themselves in the shoes of any other human being (this is a huge component to what creativity and art is in my opi…
/r/MensRights14/08/11 01:23 PM
-8

Yeah, because you morons need to be held to the exact same standards as feminist communities, right? The real fact is that you fucking ingrates label everything as misandrist. I've seen that accusation levelled at me numerous times, and when I've asked "what did I say is misandrist?" no one could ever point out what I said that could be construed as misandrist. Did you even read the quote? It's fairly easy for me to see what is and isn't misandrist because I am a man. I am not a women, so misogy…
/r/MensRights14/08/11 01:17 PM
-6

About a fucking article posted about posting in other communities that had parts cherry picked to try to make it look bad. This accusation, from you, is incredibly rich. Delusion, thy name is MRA. You fucktards aren't even willing to consider the other side of the coin. You have a fucking article here that does a good job in starting to point out the perspective opposite to yours and you narrow-minded idiots downvote the context and message just so you can be self-righteously upset about a fucki…
/r/MensRights14/08/11 01:06 PM
-6

As a man, I've done that. Have you?
/r/MensRights14/08/11 01:01 PM
-4

I really can't believe you actually said that. But I guess this is the level of what counts as "discussion" around here. You people are sad and pathetic.
/r/MensRights14/08/11 01:00 PM
-6

I wasn't aware "reality" was a form of ideology.
/r/MensRights14/08/11 12:59 PM
-8

And there we go with the insensitive and bullheaded view. If you want to be a part of someone else's community then you should have to be sensitive to how that community operates. If you want to post in a gay community you can't jump in slinging around the word "faggot" and denouncing anyone who says something is homophobic, so why the fuck would you do that to a women's community? You've done the opposite by cherry picking a short quote from a lengthy article and taking it out of context then d…
/r/MensRights14/08/11 02:27 AM
-17

Hey OP, did you even read this article? You should, because it is very good and has a lot of truth in it. The very first thing you should realize is that this is an article on men trying to become part of feminist online communities and how we can work to fit in and understand how these communities work. Here is the section of the article you quoted put into context: When lots of feminists talk about an issue, clearly it's not the delusions of one person. If someone says something is offensive, …
/r/MensRights14/08/11 02:01 AM
6

I like how you blow glib comments way out of proportion. By the way, there's no way to remove an embryo from a uterine wall and transplant it into another. You're talking about science fiction.
/r/MensRights14/08/11 01:43 AM
-3

Why bother responding to conspiracy-theory style insanity?
/r/MensRights14/08/11 01:42 AM
4

Equality: Achieved through science fiction.
/r/MensRights14/08/11 01:02 AM
2

No actually, I spend a lot of time reading Reddit, and it's pretty appalling how often you see "women don't have the logical reasoning abilities of men," "women are just crazy," "women are irrational," and the like. And such posts get quite a few upvotes from pathetic losers who actually believe this crap.
/r/MensRights14/08/11 01:00 AM
-1

"Volunteered in?" I don't know about where you live, but where I live paid employees (who make shitty wages) work in homeless shelters.
/r/MensRights14/08/11 12:57 AM
1

My default position is that women are adults, but what I find is that they constantly prove me wrong. I think you should probably learn reading comprehension since he's essentially saying "women are adults, except every woman I've met." I'm not sure how you could have missed that part as it is there clear as day. but what I find is that they constantly prove me wrong. Looks pretty sexist to me.
/r/MensRights14/08/11 12:48 AM
-7

That 75% number comes directly from Reddit's own user surveys. It's a well known figure that nobody really disputes.
/r/MensRights14/08/11 12:48 AM
-6

Hey, look. It's one of the brand new troll accounts from the very subreddit we're talking about. Yep, except I started this troll account after deleting my real account. I found that reading Reddit was sucking the life out of me with all the sexist and racist shit that gets widely praised here on Reddit every day. Thanks for backing me up on your trolling Hey, if the shoe fits. you can have your turn to scream your sexist shit later. What? (despite blatant misandry and hostility... gee, wonder h…
/r/MensRights14/08/11 12:46 AM
1

Turns out the Op's story is fake.
/r/MensRights13/08/11 11:20 PM
3

I'm not a woman. And yes he definitely is sexist. Edit: And you're a pathetic douchebag.
/r/MensRights13/08/11 10:38 PM
-10

How about you do your own research on what feminism is? Take responsibility for your own education. Edit: By the way, I think you'll find your last assertion to be absolutely wrong.
/r/MensRights13/08/11 07:48 PM
-11

feminism has a few major tenants. These are that men oppress women, women suffer disproportionately from societal problems, and that evening the playing field means that rights of women must be protected above all else. It's great when people make blanket statements about something they know nothing about and act as if these statements are fact.
/r/MensRights13/08/11 07:38 PM
-14

In other words you deny that women tend to be objectified for their sexual organs by men.
/r/MensRights13/08/11 07:36 PM
-7

It probably has something to do with how you are objectifying women when you use terms like that. Do you feel objectified when someone calls you a dick? Do people regularly reduce you to your base sexual components? Because men do that to women all the time. I know this because I am a man and I sometimes do this very thing even though I know it is wrong.
/r/MensRights13/08/11 07:34 PM
5

Seriously, in the light of learning how feminist trolls behave Where exactly did you learn this? From the same group that regularly sends PMs to people they disagree with calling them all sorts of nasty names? But it does make it much easier for feminists to 'prove' (even if it is only 'proved' in their own demented twisted little minds), that this is an anti-woman forum. Have you seen some of the shit people post here?
/r/MensRights13/08/11 07:03 PM
-1

Here's a sample: http://www.reddit.com/r/intactivists http://www.reddit.com/r/egalitarian http://www.reddit.com/r/mensrightslaw http://www.reddit.com/r/TrueFeminism/ http://www.reddit.com/r/malestudies http://www.reddit.com/r/NOMAAM/ http://www.reddit.com/r/OneY/ Just a hint: Any subreddit where pathetic sociopath kloo2yoo is a mod is a MR subreddit. Also some of these subreddits are quite decent and no one has a problem with them. Others, like this one, can be pretty bad.
/r/MensRights13/08/11 06:53 PM
-1

I think this subreddit is welcoming to woman in general Hahahahahahahahaha! Thank for the laugh you pathetic loser.
/r/MensRights13/08/11 06:51 PM
0

Which is why your fellow MRA said: My default position is that women are adults, but what I find is that they constantly prove me wrong. Right? You're so pathetic.
/r/MensRights13/08/11 06:50 PM
2

Such a mature and level-headed response! I'm sorry I ever thought you MRA idiots were ever a group of sad pathetic losers.
/r/MensRights13/08/11 04:30 PM
2

It is good.
/r/MensRights13/08/11 04:29 PM
-1

How many reddits are involved with the feminism/anti-man - anti-woman/MRA stuff? Not nearly as many subreddits as those involved with MR. By the way, I think you should compare the populations of specific subreddits. I think you'll find that the MR subreddits have far, far greater populations than the feminist subreddits.
/r/MensRights13/08/11 04:28 PM
2

Feminists don't even know what Feminism is. That's a pretty dumb statement since academia has been grappling with this question for the past 30 years and the movement can even be classed into three distinct "waves." Just because you remain purposely ignorant as to what feminism is doesn't mean no definition exists. How the fuck can you even effectively argue against something when you don't even know what the fuck it is? It's like an army going off to fight a war against an enemy they know absol…
/r/MensRights13/08/11 04:15 PM
-6

False. You might be conflating battered women shelters with homeless shelters, but the vast majority of homeless shelters are gender neutral in the people they serve. There are also many battered men shelters out there.
/r/MensRights13/08/11 04:09 PM
-7

Yeah, because Reddit, with its 75% male userbase, is just a hive of misandry. You're pathetic.
/r/MensRights13/08/11 04:07 PM
-3

MensRights 24,988 readers ShitRedditSays 1,018 readers One of these things is not like the other. One of these things just doesn't belong. I'm not seeing how a subreddit with little over 1,000 members is somehow a huge "feminist downvote brigade." It should also be pointed out that mractivist2 is a troll who does nothing more than troll subreddits that point out the stupid shit some people say on Reddit and send curse laden PMs to people. It's nice to see you pathetic MRA asshats upvoting trolls…
/r/MensRights13/08/11 04:05 PM
-6

Services such as homeless shelters should be based on the need of the person, not their sex. Which, if you do any sort of research, you will find that they are.
/r/MensRights13/08/11 03:54 PM
-4

the majority of men were still extremely oppressed, working in squalid conditions for meager pay and being expected to destroy their bodies in the process with no regard to their minds at all. The basic flaw in your thinking here is the "US vs. THEM" thinking in your mentality when it comes to gender. This comment shows that the only dividing line you see in society is MALE against FEMALE where males are poor oppressed peoples and females are somehow the upper echelon of society that has always …
/r/MensRights13/08/11 03:53 PM
2

Yeah, in your pathetic Ayn Rand fuelled wet dreams maybe.
/r/MensRights13/08/11 03:41 PM
0

Because you know exactly what feminism is, right? No wait, you have no fucking clue what feminism is, you just like to parrot stereotypes and false assertions. Damn you are pathetic.
/r/MensRights13/08/11 02:11 PM
2

There you go you pathetic misogynistic bag of shit.
/r/MensRights13/08/11 02:05 PM
2

Feminism infantilizes women and treats them like they have brains of custard. No, no you pathetic swine. Men infantilize women by believing they have the emotional maturity of children, by believing offensive stereotypes like "the hysterical woman," and by posting shit like this. In other words, this entire subreddit infantilizes women. You people are really pathetic.
/r/MensRights13/08/11 11:08 AM
6

Why should I be taxed for her whorish activities? Damn you're pathetic. Probably because [a man is] responsible for inserting 50% of your chromosomes into her?
/r/MensRights12/08/11 11:03 PM
2

Nope, it's a statement that you specifically are a very pathetic person.
/r/MensRights12/08/11 10:56 PM
2

Yeah, my account is 10 hours old. I started it after I got fed up with all the sexist and racist bigotry I saw pathetic Redditors engaging in on a thread found on another forum. You really are quite pathetic since you accuse others of doing exactly what you yourself do. But I guess you need an extreme amount of paranoia to believe the MRA bullshit.
/r/MensRights12/08/11 10:09 PM
6

FYI: mractivist2 and prrrbs are both sock-puppet accounts used by the same person.
/r/MensRights12/08/11 09:54 PM
1

Is that an invitation Mr. Pathetic-Moderator-Man?
/r/MensRights12/08/11 09:38 PM
2

Dude, you are one of the most pathetic people I've ever seen. You're just mindbogglingly pathetic at every level.
/r/MensRights12/08/11 09:27 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter