TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Yourhero88 Archive

View 0 posts and 15 comments by Yourhero88 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
7

/r/keto reporting in, and mad as hell.
/r/MensRights07/05/12 05:28 PM
2

Devil's advocate: it's her child, and she has the right to control who does and does not interact with her when under her (the mother's) care. Truthfully though, it's the result of an infuriating stereotype.
/r/MensRights03/05/12 03:47 PM
10

You know, at first I thought, "I think we may be a tad oversensitive on this one." But then I considered the fact that there can't be one young man that this happened to whose life was not altered drastically by an event that they did not initiate. I think South Park really nailed the reaction to this; it's going to become impossible to incriminate people for this eventually due to the overwhelming levity applied to it. Oh, and of course, obligatory Adam Sandler sucks, etc...
/r/MensRights03/05/12 02:41 PM
26

Bullshit, that's harassment. As everyone else is saying, restraining order, and consider a civil suit.
/r/MensRights30/04/12 05:15 PM
2

I don't think marriage was the problem here. Clearly they were married before he came into the money he had, but the blame is on him for not having the proper legal precautions taken AFTER he began making millions, to ensure this didn't happen. This is not any sort of reason for the average person to forsake marriage.
/r/MensRights23/04/12 01:48 PM
1

I honestly have never experienced this. I'm only 27, so that might be why, but it's still outrageous.
/r/MensRights19/04/12 07:06 PM
13

I heard this story on my morning radio show, in the same segment they talk about other 'wacky news stories!' On the plus side, they at least recognized that it must have been serious for the man to call the police, a detail that seems to make it even funnier to everyone else who discusses this story.
/r/MensRights17/04/12 06:50 PM
-1

-20 downvotes for calmly asking a question, and stating my opinion. Glad to see reddiquette is in full-force here.
/r/MensRights17/04/12 02:46 PM
0

You frame a good argument, and I see the logic behind it. I still don't agree with it, but this is helping me feel out some of the objections here. By and large I agree with most things on MFA, but this was one thing that stood out to me, so I wanted to see what all of the ruckus was about.
/r/MensRights16/04/12 06:37 PM
-3

Totally fair. I tend to get riled up when choice is threatened. I'm not pro-circumcision, I'm just anti-legislation.
/r/MensRights16/04/12 06:05 PM
-5

How is popularity a logical fallacy? It is a fact that the majority of American men are circumcised. Is there a rampancy of ED and infection? If there were, it would be outlawed on that alone, but since these cases are so rare, it is left up to the parent and doctors involved, as it should be. Whether or not you consider it necessary or purely cosmetic, the choice should not be eliminated.
/r/MensRights16/04/12 05:58 PM
-11

No, because FGM has no medical or hygienic benefits. Aside from that, I still think it should be left to the parents. I'm a libertarian; if it's not a criminal act, then keep the government the hell out of it.
/r/MensRights16/04/12 05:38 PM
-9

Because FGM serves no purpose but to punish the child; circumcision is widely practiced, and millions of men live successfully with it done. I was circumcised and can report no health or performance issues as a result through my life. As previously stated, it is more hygienic, and generally more culturally favored.
/r/MensRights16/04/12 05:23 PM
-12

Okay, but from a purely objective standpoint, you have a procedure that is widely accepted, with similarly wide resistance; why bother making it illegal? It's not a criminal act, it should be left up to the parents and doctors involved, and nobody else.
/r/MensRights16/04/12 04:52 PM
-21

Is circumcision something mensrights is fairly unified against? Personally, I think it's still largely a tradition that should be left to the parent, and is generally something that medical professionals agree is beneficial in the long run (for hygiene, less likely to have infection, etc...) I think with any medical procedure, cosmetic or otherwise, there is a risk. Is this really something that needs to be regulated by the government?
/r/MensRights16/04/12 04:36 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter