TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

YouthfulSagponds Archive

View 0 posts and 25 comments by YouthfulSagponds on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

enough evidence to prove Kost's innocence? You've internalised feminism; the accused should not have to prove his innocence. Dude, I wrote that sentence very carefully. Presumption of innocence ends once somebody has been convicted. Kost has already been declared guilty. Now the impetus is on his defense to show his innocence, not just cast reasonable doubt on his guilt. I wouldn't have written about Cosby in the same language (though Cosby has admitted to using qaaludes illegally on sex partner…
/r/MensRights26/07/16 01:02 PM
–

You linked to another one of your comments, which in turn linked to a self post. I'm not sure how you're trying to convince my there. Also Tyler Kost and Cosby cases in which many witnesses colluding to fabricate claims. It's remarkable to me how sure you are of Kost and Cosby's innocence. Have you looked at the evidence for "collusion" by the victims in the Kost trial? Some (not all) of them watched a movie together, and one of them thought that it was going to be "fun." In the movie, the plot …
/r/MensRights25/07/16 11:34 AM
2

Of course. You could say that for every single trial, because any lawyer is going to try to present evidence that their client is innocent. "Jeffrey Dahmer was convicted in spite of evidence that he didn't commit any crimes" is a true, if perhaps misleading, statement.
/r/MensRights24/07/16 10:58 PM
–

Obviously the standard for evidence has to be a lot higher, but I wouldn't say that eyewitness testimony alone is never enough for to reach preponderance of evidence. What about a situation where you have many witnesses with similar stories vs. a defendant with a shaky story that changes under questioning?
/r/MensRights24/07/16 08:49 PM
–

Without any physical evidence. Testimony from the plaintiff is still evidence.
/r/MensRights24/07/16 06:43 PM
3

The larger the movie, the more critics, and the score is likely the more representative of public opinion. This is a well made point. I've noticed generally higher metascores for smaller indie film productions, but never thought about how this could explain it (by drawing in critics that are fans of that particular type of movie). In a way, scores are self-modulating, where the smaller niche movies get metascores that better reflect the smaller niche audience that those films attract. Because Gh…
/r/MensRights19/07/16 03:14 AM
–

Or if the movie legitimately deserves a 3% lower score but the number of female critics coming in specifically because of the content and reviewing it more positively means that the overall percentage of negative reviews is going to include more male critics. Depends. Back to our horror movie example, maybe critics that enjoy horror movies are more likely to watch horror movies and give them reviews, raising the metascore of those movies above what they would be if a truly random sample of criti…
/r/MensRights19/07/16 12:59 AM
8

The headline here gets the data mixed up. Maybe men make up 76% of movie critics as a whole but they only make up ~67% of the reviewers for the new Ghostbuster movie. (An interesting point- were more female critics drawn to review Ghostbusters because of its content?) Were male and female critics completely critically impartial, we should expect 67% of the negative reviews to come from men instead of the actual number (currently ~72% by my count). To me, the question of whether male or female cr…
/r/MensRights18/07/16 10:41 PM
7

Nah, more like "Look at how much rape rates have gone down, this is obviously the work of feminist campaigns against rape."
/r/MensRights25/03/16 08:23 PM
1

Likewise
/r/MensRights18/03/16 04:32 PM
1

I think we're using two different definitions of "reported" here. I'm using "reported" as a synonym for alleged, to mean sexual victimizations that were reported to the police (or prison officials). I'm not talking about sexual acts found in anonymous surveys that may or may not have been considered a crime by the subject. The National Inmate Survey where the 3.2% number comes from, is one of those anonymous surveys, and has all the trappings that anonymous surveys often have. If you want to dir…
/r/MensRights18/03/16 12:13 PM
1

The number of reported prison rapes is incredibly high, the number of substantiated prison rapes is low for obvious reasons. The number of reported sexual victimizations in prisons and jails, including rape and sexual assault, was 8,793 in 2015. With a prison population of ~2.2 million, that means that the yearly prevalence for sexual victimization of prisoners is 0.4%. The yearly prevalence for sexual victimization of non prisoners is 0.1% (same source) and there's a lot more of them. Prison re…
/r/MensRights18/03/16 01:02 AM
1

In India there's less than 100 reported cases of female infanticide a year. And there are fewer than a thousand substantiated claims of prison rape each year in the US, but that hasn't stopped certain MRAs from claiming that it's more than the total number of rapes against women. I completely agree that the numbers in her source are obviously inflated (and the war death toll deflated), and that sex-selective abortion and infanticide deaths shouldn't be directly compared to the death toll by war …
/r/MensRights18/03/16 12:14 AM
1

Get this. I'm against both! In other slave owning societies, slaves comprised what we would consider white collar work. Are you sure you're against both? Because it really reads like you're going out of your way to defend slavery. The rest of your comment is inarticulate gibberish I'll try to use smaller words if you're having trouble understanding
/r/MensRights17/03/16 10:56 PM
1

She doesn't split up infanticide from sex-selective abortion, and if you look at the statistics, it's really not clear how many are one or the other. All we know is that there is a huge gender gap in the population. The reason is that BOTH infanticide AND sex-selective abortion are illegal in China, for example, and if the Chinese government has statistics on either they're not sharing (for obvious PR reasons). Yes, infanticide is probably less common than sex-selective abortions, but some stati…
/r/MensRights17/03/16 10:44 PM
1

I said: This is similar to the differences between indentured servants and black slaves in pre-civil war America, i.e. an incomparable amount of actual suffering and civil rights violations. u/typhonblue said: Many slaves were treated better than indentured servants because they had monetary value to their owners. Unless you're being willfully obtuse, it's clear that in this particular context we're specifically comparing black American slaves to conscripted soldiers. If you want to compare mode…
/r/MensRights17/03/16 10:19 PM
-1

Many slaves were treated better than indentured servants because they had monetary value to their owners. Oh shit are you a slavery apologist too? Conscription was literally slavery, but actual slavery wasn't that bad because the owners "valued their slaves" in your opinion? By your rationale, being conscripted wasn't so bad either because the generals "valued" their troops. You're missing the point entirely. Yes, a vanishingly small percentage of slaves were paid as part of their enslavement, b…
/r/MensRights17/03/16 05:55 PM
1

Are infants fetuses? I'm referring to infanticide here.
/r/MensRights17/03/16 05:44 PM
-2

I called it hyperbole because there were some major differences between conscripted soldiers and slaves, notably the soldiers were 1) paid a (better than average) wage and 2) not expected to remain soldiers their entire lives, just a deployment and 3) yes they still had legal rights. This is similar to the differences between indentured servants and black slaves in pre-civil war America, i.e. an incomparable amount of actual suffering and civil rights violations. The only similarity is the aspec…
/r/MensRights17/03/16 04:03 PM
0

...except the infants that are being killed, right?
/r/MensRights17/03/16 03:52 PM
-9

widespread state slavery and execution of men Hilarious hyperbole aside, how widespread is something when it literally hasn't happened in over 40 years?
/r/MensRights17/03/16 02:25 AM
-5

But that's the thing- they are preferentially aborting female fetuses (and committing infanticide against female newborns). They can justify it using whatever means they want, but that doesn't change the fact that female infants and fetuses are specifically targeted. Personally, I think the comparison between war deaths and female deaths from infanticide etc. is being taken too far. Clearly, killing adult soldiers is a lot worse than aborting unborn fetuses. And on the flipside, the targeting of…
/r/MensRights16/03/16 11:51 PM
0

Are you saying that 33 million female Chinese have been killed through gender-directed infanticide and sex-selective abortion because they were privileged?
/r/MensRights16/03/16 07:18 PM
8

Gender discrimination is responsible for the large discrepancy between male and female deaths in wars in the 20th century. This is a pretty significant difference from what you said. Nobody was killing soldiers because they were men, they were killing them because they were at war.
/r/MensRights16/03/16 05:24 PM
-1

Unreal, Sex selective abortion…really? In the united states the vast majority of abortions take place within the first trimester, 91% of the 1.6 million annual abortions to be exact, the trend is similar throughout the west and probably world wide unless theres [sic] some epidemic of late term abortions that I’m unaware of, yet the gender of an embryo isnt [sic] testable until at least the sixteenth week of pregnancy. Meaning that most abortions happen before the gender is even known. unless the…
/r/MensRights16/03/16 04:17 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter