TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Yromemtnatsisrep Archive

View 0 posts and 77 comments by Yromemtnatsisrep on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

It’s not, there is nothing FUNDAMENTAL about ideological feminism that is forwardly and actively against men’s issue. Rather certain Male issues took a fast back seat socially over the past few years in the wake of feminist initiatives. THAT is what men’s rights activism is attempting to rectify. That and certain issues that have always had a blind eye in the western world. If you genuinely think the difference between MRA and Feminism are equivalent to the differences between the KKK and BLM, I…
/r/MensRights11/08/22 08:11 PM
2

False equivalents and a bad faith comparison. Those two groups are IDEOLOGICALLY opposed.
/r/MensRights11/08/22 07:38 PM
2

I should have specified feminism vs feminist
/r/MensRights10/08/22 11:29 PM
-3

It’s almost entirely archaic, fallacious and honestly mostly toxic rhetoric. The Alpha/Beta/wolf pack dynamic is NOT an inherent social dynamic, it is not even THAT represented in the animal kingdom. He is financially preying on insecure and subsequently bitter angry men, and his views on most things do not really align with MRA tenets which are simply “hey please don’t just ignore male social/health issues just because we’re the historic aggressors” The MRA movement cannot nor should-not be Ant…
/r/MensRights10/08/22 07:52 PM
1

Shiiiiiiiit. You right, you right.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/12/19 06:10 PM
0

It shoulda be “equal heights, equal rights” as he pulls her up eye level
/r/PussyPassDenied01/12/19 02:22 PM
0

I agree. But you can see how it’s within the realm of understandable behavior.
/r/MensRights01/11/19 03:40 AM
-18

While it is sad that these types of alarmist false accusations happen, you also can’t blame somebody for reacting quickly to what could be a terrible situation. I don’t know if this constitutes ‘white-knighting’.
/r/MensRights31/10/19 07:35 PM
2

Yeah but they aren’t. Women as an entire collective are not THE problem. They can’t be, solely based on their previous lack of representation in government. This issue, like most, is multifaceted and interwoven into our culture. Think of the role the draft has played historically on the constructs of our “American Masculinity”. It’s a part of our cultural identification of masculinity, so even we as men, however minimally or subconsciously have felt the effects of this on both sides. Just as we …
/r/MensRights07/08/19 01:07 PM
2

Agreed! I once heard “it should never be Men Vs Women, but rather Men and Women Vs The problem”
/r/MensRights07/08/19 12:35 AM
11

No wonder they don’t get custody. You can’t watch after kids while you’re dying in industrial accidents
/r/MensRights13/07/19 03:33 PM
6

They should start a band
/r/MensRights03/07/19 10:09 AM
14

I assumed that what it was
/r/MensRights17/12/18 07:24 AM
1

Lightoller saved a lot of people by taking the reigns when’s the chain of command broke down. Order was given because they didn’t know how fucked they were with no ships being around for quite a while, the California was supposed to be coming annnny minute. He also was on a whole bunch of sinking ships. Cargo ship Holthill. HMS Falcon HMS Olympic........ A lot. Actually, he might be a bad luck piece of shit. But he did rescue 127 sailors at Dunkirk.
/r/MensRights13/11/18 01:49 PM
1

The burden of proof lies on the person making the claim. If you want to claim something without providing evidence it can be dismissed without providing evidence. It’s just how the world do.
/r/MensRights13/11/18 01:28 PM
1

The use of uppity gives it away.
/r/MensRights13/11/18 01:25 PM
1

I’ve seen a nearly identical info graphic with citations. Searching now.
/r/MensRights13/11/18 01:21 PM
4

Irrelevant. It’s not men vs women. It should men and women vs social problems. MRA’s are saying “we have some issues that we’d like your helping fixing” Now if random woman x doesn’t want to help innocent man y because of the actions of guilty man Z, we have a bigger problem.
/r/MensRights13/11/18 01:20 PM
1

I think the point here is that in quite a few areas (as shown in the picture), they do have it far worse. Now it isn’t saying “hey look at men! We have it bad! See!” but more bringing to light that we could use some help as well.
/r/MensRights13/11/18 01:18 PM
1

I will say though, while you get some toxicity (every group has got some), I think you’ll be pleasantly surprised by the civility and respectable discourse in this group. To be honest, most of what I see is just frustration about the fudging of numbers and about the allocations for social programs being skewed.
/r/MensRights13/11/18 01:15 PM
3

I will say though, while you get some toxicity (every group has got some), I think you’ll be pleasantly surprised by the civility and respectable discourse in this group. To be honest, most of what I see is just frustration about the fudging of numbers and about the allocations for social programs being skewed.
/r/MensRights13/11/18 01:15 PM
1

Is that the answer?
/r/MensRights13/11/18 01:08 PM
1

This issue is not about men vs women. These aren’t two feuding sports teams with blue and pink uniforms. This is about men and women vs The Problem. That problem being injustice and inequality. When men as a whole need some help, we should help raise them up. When women need some some help, we should help raise them up. But none of this should ever be done at the expense of the other.
/r/MensRights13/11/18 01:07 PM
1

I’ve seen one like this but with citations. Anyone have that laying around?
/r/MensRights13/11/18 01:02 PM
3

I’ve been seeing this. What’s the dealio here
/r/MensRights21/05/18 12:19 PM
11

Not a Debbie downer! A critical thinker, and logical person!
/r/MensRights08/05/18 12:59 PM
49

It’s coconut water btw
/r/MensRights22/04/18 03:12 PM
1

Mandatory minimum sentences. Sadly not much that can be done.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/04/18 02:36 PM
2

You got caught it the crossfires. This wasn’t to you. I agree with you mostly, about the blank slate. If you scroll through these commons the common Sentiment here is not that sadly.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/03/18 01:30 PM
2

The real question is why am I even here lol But you just gave me my second wind
/r/PussyPassDenied29/03/18 10:37 PM
2

That’s very kind. This is my first internet fight. Their hatred fuels me.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/03/18 10:27 PM
1

Yes. The fact that we see no biologically definable characteristics differentiating race. If there was an inherent genetic difference causing this aggression we would expect to see it in the genome. We don’t http://sitn.hms.harvard.edu/flash/2017/science-genetics-reshaping-race-debate-21st-century/
/r/PussyPassDenied29/03/18 10:20 PM
1

Well I think it’s cool when you meet someone with opposing world views who share common interests to try and connect. It is another human
/r/PussyPassDenied29/03/18 10:16 PM
1

Over your head woosh? Or the rush of expanding your mind woosh?
/r/PussyPassDenied29/03/18 07:33 PM
1

Now you know!
/r/PussyPassDenied29/03/18 07:30 PM
1

That stat is accurate, I’m not debating those numbers. The issue here is that there is nothing inherent in them that causes that. It’s a cultural, sociopolitical and socioeconomic issue, not one of biology and “race”
/r/PussyPassDenied29/03/18 06:06 PM
2

Most of the world does when you consider our origins. But seriously the term negroid was wildly use in historic medicine, but has since been abandoned. It is still used in certain forensics and historic anthropology, but the medical community has all but dismissed the term. Source: http://jech.bmj.com/content/59/12/1014
/r/PussyPassDenied29/03/18 06:04 PM
2

I didn’t make an unsupported, anecdotal assertion, you did. If you can support your ideas with facts, reassess your ideas or search for the facts. If you can’t find the facts, then what you stated is an opinion and opinions have little worth in a discussion like this.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/03/18 05:59 PM
2

I didn’t know psychologists dealt with health AND mental health AND income AND life expectancy Also waiting on that source.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/03/18 02:58 PM
3

I did misspeak, but actually it effects Hispanics, south Asians and Southern European Caucasian’s . Sadly the medical community doesn’t use “white and black”
/r/PussyPassDenied29/03/18 02:57 PM
1

You are misunderstanding entirely, and I’m not not entirely sure how that could be derived from what I said (seems to be a trend) Race is phenotypic. Your phenotype are what traits manifest themselves physically. Your appearance, hair, skin etc. Here we do have a difference from race to race (that’s why we have different looking people in our beautiful varied world) Genetically speaking, there is no difference in the genome (genetic map) of humans from one race to another. So you and me have dif…
/r/PussyPassDenied29/03/18 02:56 PM
0

And here you are not knowing the difference between phenotype and genotype
/r/PussyPassDenied29/03/18 02:42 PM
1

A much smaller percentage. We does trace our lineage back to that afflicted population. That’s the point
/r/PussyPassDenied29/03/18 02:30 PM
2

Firstly, Sickle Cell anemia has higher rates of occurrence in African Americans NOT black people as a whole. Sickle cell is an example of pseudogenetic -bottlenecking. When a new population is started with a small group of individuals after a bottlenecking event (ie started a slave trade with west Africa) the frequencies of certain traits increases while genetic variation decreases.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/03/18 02:21 PM
1

I did. I said that race is only biological in the sense of your phenotype is biological, but there is no real genomic difference between races.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/03/18 02:09 PM
1

The fact that this is downvotes is remarkable
/r/PussyPassDenied29/03/18 02:06 PM
0

Do you have a non-anecdotal source? And here lies the problem with the artificial concept of race. When you say “blacks” what do you mean, and who are you comparing it against? Are you comparing black Europeans to Haitians? West African Blacks To South African Blacks? Let’s assume you just meant Black Americans. Who are you comparing them against? Is it the whole of America? You have to compare WITHIN a similar demographic to make a claim such as “generally speaking, yes we are saying [they have…
/r/PussyPassDenied29/03/18 02:05 PM
2

Source please? Because “Various life outcomes” is a remarkably unscientific phrase.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/03/18 01:45 PM
0

Nope. Here a personal example: I am an American citizen. America is my nationality. Ethnically I am Armenian (2nd generation), racially I am white. If nationality is political, ethnicity is cultural background and ancestry, race is appearance. Now nationality and ethnicity have some overlap, but have major difference. Please check any encyclopedia or dictionary. It’s simple stuff.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/03/18 02:45 AM
2

I know. But it’s fun practice if not soul sucking
/r/PussyPassDenied29/03/18 02:20 AM
1

Well this is my junk account, hence why I’m on Pussypassdenied. I’m not from the south, I am “American” but only live in country about 3 months a year. I love all books, and think it’s awesome you also enjoy the classics (Greek dramas are my favorites) and love theological literature (huuuge hitchens nerd) as well. Send me a pm we can talk about it!
/r/PussyPassDenied29/03/18 02:20 AM
-2

A rational, well said response. Have an upvote for being human.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/03/18 02:05 AM
2

No, just well read, well traveled, and open minded.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/03/18 02:02 AM
0

Race is a sociopolitical phenomenon: Race is not inherently objective, but a subjective grouping based of phenotype the foundation of which is tied in with our social and political history. Race is a social construct: Race is a constructed grouping of people based on physical appearance (phenotype). They are essentially the same statement, the summation of which is the notions race exists as not only a human creation, but one that shifts through time. A ever changing list of characteristic that …
/r/PussyPassDenied29/03/18 01:49 AM
-6

It’s my first internet fight, I’m drowning in a sea of ill informed. It’s worth the downvotes though.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/03/18 01:37 AM
-1

Race deals with difference in the frequencies of certain phenotypes (appearances) of populations. Ethnicity deals with a common ancestry, common nation, shared traditions, cultural norms/ideals, and language. Sources: http://www.pbs.org/race/000_About/002_04-experts-03-02.htm https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_(human_categorization)
/r/PussyPassDenied29/03/18 01:34 AM
-7

Thank you!
/r/PussyPassDenied29/03/18 01:27 AM
1

I don’t know enough of politics to answer that. It’s the science behind it the interest me.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/03/18 01:25 AM
1

The whole continent of Africa? Absolutely. Consider the differences between Uganda and Egypt. Don’t forget South Africa either. If you think Race relations are solely an American issue read about the history of apartheid. Wherever there are people, there will be groups of being labeling and grouping them in manageable portions. It’s what our monkey brain does. My contention is that there is no real genetic difference between races. The notion is a construct used by use to simply and group our va…
/r/PussyPassDenied29/03/18 01:21 AM
2

Great example! Seriously, because while your point would have been valid 8 years ago, recent DNA studies show the the African golden jackal is actually more closely related to wolves. There is actually a group of scientist calling for it to be renamed “African Golden wolf” . It’s a really beautiful example of parallel evolution. Source: http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2015/07/african-golden-jackals-are-actually-golden-wolves Because here we see a difference in the genome, not just one of phenotyp…
/r/PussyPassDenied29/03/18 01:17 AM
1

See above.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/03/18 01:07 AM
2

Hmm. Foolish me “hiding” behind the words of those more learned than I. Now the first and most glaring argument that the notion of race is something that was socially constructed my humans, is that we don’t see it in the animal kingdom. We separate animals by class, by species, by phylum and kingdom, but never by “race”. Why is that? Our notion of what constitutes “black” and what constitutes “white” is a product of social context. a good definition for "race" to use here is that people who trac…
/r/PussyPassDenied29/03/18 12:24 AM
0

I didn’t report anyone. I am a massive advocate for free speech. If you think “race is a social construct” equates to “being black is something society constructed” then I think we are at an impasse, and sadly there is nothing we can learn from each other .
/r/PussyPassDenied28/03/18 11:59 PM
-2

Ethnicity and race are two different things friend.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/03/18 11:53 PM
-15

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/race-is-a-social-construct-scientists-argue/
/r/PussyPassDenied28/03/18 11:47 PM
-8

The bell curve was NOT peer reviewed before it was released. That was part of the controversy.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/03/18 11:45 PM
-46

Race is a social construct. It exists with the confines and boundaries we give it. It is better to deal with people on a one on one level. In this video, “their” was incorrect.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/03/18 11:38 PM
-9

Most bigots do. EDIT: actually. That was wrong of me. I don’t know if you are or you aren’t. Just be careful with that notion. There is an inherent fear of what’s different engrained in all of us. It has major evolutionary significance. But remember that your “gut” is not always the best teacher, and that your “gut” was largely shaped by all the facets that make you, you.; the good and the bad.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/03/18 11:31 PM
-6

I guess friend. Sad you don’t get a choice in the matter
/r/PussyPassDenied28/03/18 11:25 PM
-75

Statistically speaking there has been no peer reviewed contemporary locked variable study done on race and IQ, and since the scientific community considers race to be a sociopolitical phenomenon and not a biological/genetic one, I doubt we can ever have a valid answer here. That being said, when social and economic variables are constant between groups we see the IQs nearly identical within the margin of error. It’s also not 1974 anymore. IQ tests are sorta archaic.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/03/18 11:20 PM
-99

Oh shit. I didn’t know that. I thought you were implying that black people have limited vocabulary and are less intelligent, but you don’t believe that right?
/r/PussyPassDenied28/03/18 11:07 PM
-84

Her vocabulary. He doesn’t say it in that video. There are some race based implications when you say “Their Vocabulary”
/r/PussyPassDenied28/03/18 11:03 PM
3

Three
/r/PussyPassDenied14/02/17 03:39 PM
111

woooooooooa, slow down there partner. Carlos Mencia and Fluffy are in too different worlds. Fluffy is a good comedian who just happens to have his own style which some people love some people hate. While his shows have minimal arc, he is a great story teller with a charming pedestrian aesthetic. Carlos Mencia is chlorinated cumpool
/r/PussyPassDenied14/02/17 02:46 PM
2

Especially when on any give NYC subway, there are more woman sitting than men. Always
/r/MensRights12/03/16 10:28 AM
2

Well my new policy is I won't babysit for anyone with that mentality. I only babysit for like minded people now. I have enough of a reputation where I don't have to take every family that comes my way
/r/MensRights17/11/15 09:44 PM
4

As a male babysitter I get this constantly. I am a fantastic babysitter and do so in NYC where it is a full time job and fairly competitive for the nature of the work. I have phenomenal references (a few pseudo celebs and we'll know author on parenting no less) yet occasionally someone will say "we're not comfortable having a man babysit out daughter" the subtext of which is "we think you'll rape our daughter" Hurts man.
/r/MensRights16/11/15 02:01 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter