TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Yuo_cna_Raed_Tihs Archive

View 1 posts and 313 comments by Yuo_cna_Raed_Tihs on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
54

False AccusationYuo_cna_Raed_Tihs/r/MensRights11/08/17 02:34 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
–

The fact that 4 month old babies can identify something doesn't make it not a social construct?? 4 month old babies can tell languages apart lol But tbh I agree that beauty isn't entirely socially constructed, but the fact that there are some aspects of beauty that are not a social construct doesn't actually negate my overall point
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/25 02:26 PM
–

The problem is that beauty is a social construct so it shouldn't matter how much effort is put in, you should still expect a similar distribution of attractiveness. Like if women all stopped trying overnight, there might be some adjustment but eventually there'd still be as many women who are 10s as before. Because that's how social constructs work. But consider men. Women were given penis models and asked which one was ideal and they chose one that was 95th percentile in size. Their ideal heigh…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/25 10:32 AM
3

Why does it matter? It's a nebulous boogeyman, but it's so so easy to just buy into it and then explain why your solutions help address the actual harm of the men issue, or that the mainstream feminist solution makes the problem worse by "reinforcing patriarchy".
/r/MensRights16/01/25 01:32 PM
1

But... He doesn't say that in the video? Like unironically the idea that women's preference for tall men or men paying on first date is rooted in patriarchy and misogyny is something I have told my women friends to get them to self reflect. It's a legitimate argument, and you're asserting that he isn't making it in good faith because Other people say men's preferences are evil Feminists don't act on it. Both of those can be addressed by the fact that feminists are often hypocrites and don't do i…
/r/MensRights14/01/25 01:31 PM
0

Also, his example about women only wanting to date short men because being short is "Feminine". Well if Feminists are all about "Smashing The Patriarchy" then clearly they should be dating shorter men because that would directly fly in the face of what "The Patriarchy" wants right? Yes. He's calling those women hypocrites.
/r/MensRights13/01/25 08:28 PM
1

I mean the quote about men and sex is silly but she's historically right about the white people thing, and right even now tbh Like many white people will listen to Kendrick without actually caring about structural racism, or indeed their own racial biases. Obviously #NotAllWhitePeople but the point is to show that cultural acceptance of black people doesn't necessarily translate to people becoming anti racist to the extent that some would assume
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/12/24 12:07 PM
1

Kamala is bad for black men because of her historic tough on crime record, and trump will of course work to make the criminal justice system far less punitive and structurally racist and sexist
/r/MensRights11/10/24 07:17 AM
1

The optimal response is to justify your decision using principles she seems to care about, which depends heavily on the specific woman. Eg if she's left leaning and vaguely eco friendly, say used cars are better for the environment. If shes more conservative, say you save every cent to give your kids the best life possible because that's all you care about.
/r/MensRights16/07/24 10:32 AM
7

The problem is beauty standards are always going to be relative to others. Once women looksmaxx, what it means to be a 10 and a 5 will change. The same is true for men The problem is rn men are rated by women on the 80 20 ratio, and there is no reason for us to assume that after men start looksmaxxing, that will change. When every guy gets really good at makeup and their beard and grooming or whatever, women will just default to distinguishing between guys with some other metrics.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/24 10:29 PM
15

The funny thing from this is how both sexes say they want someone intelligent but neither actually do haha
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/24 10:26 PM
7

The specific issues people have are Womens physical preferences are encouraged to be vocalised whereas mens aren't. it's totally okay for a woman to loudly proclaim she wants guys 6ft+, to use short as an insult etc, whereas men aren't allowed to do the same. The behaviours men (and boys) are told to help get them laid don't actually work lol. it's not just from their mom, but the most prominent source of useful advice is from PUA communities. And most of their advice sucks lol. The big issue wo…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/24 10:24 PM
2

Standards are always relative. If my standards are such that most women meet them, I have low standards. If, for example, every woman stopped doing makeup overnight, my standards (and indeed most men's standards) would drop in that regard too. Conversely, if every man gained 6 inches in height, the women who ask for 6ft or taller would simply instead ask for 6ft6 and taller.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/24 08:32 AM
1

I mean he doesn't go "guys look at me i have so much sex with women, you should be like me to have sex with women too".
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/22 06:24 PM
11

The difference is Harry and Justin don't flaunt the fact that women find them attractive. They spend literally no time trying to spread the ability to pull bitches The very act of spreading "game" means you're not going to be the Styles type guy, because they don't view women as conquests (at least, not outwardly. That's part of their charm)
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/22 12:23 PM
1

Oh yeah fair enough that's a good poinr
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/22 07:39 PM
2

Culture includes women lol In the west at least, women aren't pressured by culture to date abusers.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/22 04:51 PM
34

Which suggests the issue is female selection no?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/22 11:12 AM
2

Yeah both you and OP are totally right and it sucks cuz idk exactly how this issue can be meaningfully resolved
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/22 10:33 PM
1

sporty type, exclusively "manly interests", frat bro who is concerned not coming off as "gay", emotionally distant, and borderline dumb about topics outside sports Idk bro I did debate in university and got plenty of pussy through that avenue. I imagine it depends on the type of girls. Guys who fuck like, generic sorority girls, yeah they probably fit that archetype. But if you're a niche guy (relatively athletic guy who does debate but isn't unbearably obnoxious) you can bag niche girls with ni…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/22 01:01 AM
-1

Only incels oppose Universal healthcare and minimum wage increases 😎
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/22 02:13 PM
2

I think every person is playing a game of some sort, but I'm specifically talking about the annoying game that the original commenter described. Not every girl plays that game, to just got to get kucky
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/22 03:30 AM
3

To be clear I'm also a guy lol. I find playing their game fun when I'm not looking for a LTR. If I wanted a LTR I'd avoid game playing girls
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/22 04:51 PM
5

True but a lot of the time I play the game cuz it's fun, not cuz I'm trying to get laid. I used to do it in college even when I was in a committed relationship and would eventually mention my girlfriend and watch their face sink lol I was a bit of a dick. But we move
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/22 04:49 PM
1

True. But i leave fingerprints everywhere regardless. Might as well have fun 🤷‍♀️
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/22 03:50 PM
-1

Just move on to the next girl lol As long as you don't do something terrible or play the game w the wrong person (eg, an employee), there aren't any real repercussions.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/22 03:46 PM
-6

It's fun tbh. Like a little game of sorts.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/22 03:43 PM
1

I think the only difference is guys will debate you but then just refuse to change their mind or acknowledge they're wrong. I wouldn't call that open minded really women OTOH won't even debate you Obviously there's exceptions here but in general that's what I've found
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/22 01:38 AM
4

Your mom disagrees
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/22 05:23 AM
2

Yeah it's things that come under RP but also come under just general knowledge lol The closest redpill take he has is like, strong emphasis on self improvement and not jacking off. But that's still not really red pill, it's just self helf book stuff
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/22 02:55 PM
8

To each their own but I have 4 sisters and no brothers, and all of my sisters are better conversationalists than a load of guys I've had the misfortune of meeting lol It's definitely a funny take but if he sincerely believes that (or if anyone sincerely believes that) then they need to get out more
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/22 02:15 PM
5

I agree tbh I use it all the time even though I also don't have a Bugatti You can also use it like the "who? No i mean who asked" joke that was everywhere a while ago
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/22 03:30 AM
7

I'm not taking it literally. I'm saying he says these outrageous things in an obviously joke way, and it gets views and clicks because people like me find it funny, and some people take it seriously and think he's a total clown. The point is mainly that his "red pill" stuff isn't really what's made him famous
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/22 03:29 AM
36

The context of that quote actually makes it worse He says brother sister relationships can never be as good as brother brother relationships because sisters are girls and girls are useless at conversation 😭😭
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/22 01:48 AM
12

There is some red pill stuff like "women want a strong man who can take care of them" but and "women shouldn't sleep around because it indicates they have low standards and it means I'll doubt paternity" but it's not like, AFBB or 666 or whatever.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/22 01:47 AM
180

Apart from the fact that he has like, thousands of accounts pushing his content, a lot of his fame isn't even due to his "based red pill" takes. Most of the videos I've seen on my feed have been him just saying obviously outlandish shit "I won't give you cpr unless you're a hot girl, if you're my friend and you have a heart attack, stop being a little bitch" "Only broke people drink not sparkling water" "I walked into a Starbucks and asked for a coffee and they asked me what kind. I just want fu…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/22 11:48 PM
1

The logic is sound TBF. She's saying she doesn't care about height, but that society generally does
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/22 11:38 PM
1

The tweet doesn't really accurately interpret the data even if we assume this is a representative sample because it's not cumulative and women apparently care about the guy possibly being too tall.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/22 08:22 PM
1

Yeah agreed, but again, this sub isn't a monolith. So you have some people who slut shame but don't complain about getting laid, and people who complain about getting laid but don't slut shame And there's probably a degree of overlap but I'm hesitant to say that EVERY slut shamer is also complaining about getting laid and vice versa. Like I don't see anything in OPs post about him complaining about getting laid (but i haven't perused his comment history and wouldn't be too surprised if it had su…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/22 10:25 PM
1

No it's that the type of women to marry the first guy they fuck would also be more likely to have divorce be stigmatised, either internally or externally (family and friends) So yeah divorce is less likely, but if the only reason you're still together is cuz your wife is afraid of divorce, your marriage probably isn't great or fulfilling
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/22 09:06 PM
1

This sub isn't a monolith but yes, people who say women deserve to be slut shamed also should not complain about not getting laid
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/22 09:02 PM
1

This is a good point but ambidextrousness (?) is commonly developed very early in life, whereas heightism doesn't manifest massively till like high school
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/22 10:48 PM
3

Yeah the general rule is in sports that are like, directly competetive (basically every sport except golf), left handedness is an advantage because you're used to competing against right handers but they're not used to competing against your kind whereas in golf, it's not really direct competition, it's turn based competition, so you being left handed is irrelevant. Its actually worse than irrelevant, because golf clubs aren't ambidextrous afaik. You have to seek out left handed clubs. Whereas i…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/22 03:10 PM
33

It's possible that a lot of men overexaggerate importance of height but a lot of Blue Pill people massively downplay it
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/22 01:00 PM
14

Left handedness is probably more advantageous than being short ngl It's a cool quirk to have, you're more likely to become ambidextrous, and it's a massive advantage in a lot of competitive sports. Being short is advantageous in like, gymnastics and power lifting, and that's it
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/22 12:58 PM
5

Lmao where was that thread that said "RP being acknowledged isn't enough, RP men also want to control women" Surely if someone short who has been rejected for their height multiple times reads and hears bullshit like this, others simply going "lol it's not in your head, women do be superficial as shit" would, in fact, make them feel somewhat better?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/22 12:56 PM
1

See u/wtknight 's comment about solving the issue by changing men's behaviour instead https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/w5flv3/comment/ih7ohxx/
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/22 11:00 AM
1

I’ve seen way more men with better looking women The issue here is how we measure looks. This will inevitably be true if you generally rate women to be better looking than men, which ties back to the OKcupid study about how women rated most men as below average but men rated women's looks on a bell curve
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/22 10:55 AM
1

I think they're saying that the men of ppd complaining about AFBB are only doing so because they tried to be the AF part but failed. The reason theyre chasing monogamous relationships is because they can't get laid otherwise
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/22 10:53 AM
2

acknowledgement does not create any sort of satisfaction Disagree. I imagine it's quite satisfactory for someone to be told that the "problems" they're experiencing aren't in their heads and aren't their fault, especially after they've been gaslit for so long that all they need to do is shower or whatever
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/22 10:49 AM
3

Idk i felt it was mildly relevant and it's not a story I can normally tell lol
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/22 06:55 AM
11

When I was like 16 one of my girl friends (let's call her Alice) told me that a girl i had a crush on (let's call her Samantha) said I was "husband material, not boyfriend material". I ended up dating Alice and, after we broke up, also hooked up with Samantha but we never dated because of timing Once we all went off to uni, both of them ended up dating guys who looked a lot like me, which I thought was funny because I'm ethnic and neither of them went to particularly diverse universities lol
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/22 10:59 PM
3

My brother in Christ, that is literally the question You're saying "they withold sex from ltr men because they don't want casual sex from ltr men". The question is why they don't want casual sex from ltr men. If you already engage in hookup culture, you clearly have no moral objection to casual sex. And having sex with ltr men doesn't make them any more likely to leave you, because the type of men who'd pump and dump also won't wait that long anyways, they'd just leave. If anything, they'll leav…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/22 10:52 PM
3

Were both of you agareed about it just being a hookup? This is not really an answer tho right? Why can't they get w ltr material guy w a "hookup for the sake of it, if he stays he stays and if he leaves he leaves" mentality? Why do they have to fuck LTR material with a "I'm fucking him so that he stays" mentality?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/22 09:46 PM
3

Well assuming the sex was consensual, no security was lost Further, the idea that a woman engaging in sex loses her dignity and self esteem is a very patriarchal view of sex, seeing it as something inherently degrading for women to engage in Finally tho, none of these are exclusive to women w potential LTR men, right? If you get w some guy who isn't LTR material, that's surely as much of a loss of dignity, security, and self esteem as getting w someone who is LTR material
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/22 08:34 PM
3

That's not equivalent at all tho, because I actively lose money when I financially support a woman. A woman doesn't lose anything, and if women are to be believed, they actually gain the same thing that men do from casual sex (IE, sexual satisfaction). If they don't gain sexual satisfaction, then why do they engage in casual sex at all? Also if it makes any difference I'm also bi, so guys have pumped and dumped me, so to speak, but I don't particularly care anymore than if a guy dated me for a w…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/22 07:58 PM
2

Again not explaining why it hurts more tho But it also has happened to me lol. Way to be presumptuous x
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/22 06:04 PM
3

Even if it's a girl with whom I think we could have a future, id still choose being dumped after having had sex over the alternative. So what is the difference here? Also love you keep selectively engaging with my comments. Instead of addressing the "why does it hurt more" you just talk about how guys only date to fuck
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/22 05:55 PM
3

But why does it hurt more? Do you not like having sex or something? If I had to choose between a girl breaking up w me after a week of dating Vs a week of dating but we had sex the night before she broke up, I'd choose the latter, and I reckon most guys would too
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/22 05:52 PM
2

I'll try one last time This thread is about "withholding" sex from ltr material guys (amnt fond of that word in this context but whatever). You said that you do it because if a random guy uses you for sex, nbd, but if a LTR material guy does it, that's sad So I'm asking what's the difference between a LTR material guy breaking up with you after a week Vs breaking up with you after a week after you had sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/22 05:49 PM
3

Holy moly the question is why does it hurt if someone who's LTR material ghosts after sex instead of ghosting before sex? Or like, it doesn't have to be ghosting. It he just ends things with you after a week, why does it matter if it's before or after sex? Either way, he doesn't think your personality is compatible.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/22 05:23 PM
3

So dating someone for a week then ghosting them because not compatible is bad and doesn't hurt the other person's feelings But dating someone for a week then having sex and THEN ghosting them because they're not compatible is bad and does hurt the other person's feelings Like I'm struggling to see why one is worse than the other. In both cases, they think you're not good enough for them
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/22 05:03 PM
4

Never said they were my friends but that's also not really the point here You asked when does it happen. I pointed out it does happen. Also on a side note, does it even matter if it happens? If you make a guy wait for sex, and instead of waiting and then ghosting, he just ghosts you after he realises you're not gonna let him hit... it's still him seeing you as nothing but a sexual conquest. He still didn't see you as a person worth spending time with. The only difference is that you now also kno…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/22 04:46 PM
4

Depending on the time frame, a lot. The longest I've known someone chat to a girl to try and get laid was 6 months (he was also seeing other girls behind her back in that time TBF). Then ghosted her after she let him hit
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/22 04:41 PM
0

Surely itd hurt more if they dated you for like a month/year/whatever, fucked, then ghosted you, no?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/22 04:28 PM
1

this is a Bad. Thing. and something should be done to stop it". This doesn't actually follow. Same with JBP and Cathy Newman (though I'm probably more sympathetic to her than the ppd women in this hypothetical) Sometimes life is unfair and there's nothing that can be done. But a lot of people get a large amount of solace when the unfairness is acknowledged. That is, the very act of agreeing with someone that it's unfair, when ppd women stop gaslighting average males and admit they're privileged …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/22 10:21 AM
3

Pretty much everyone I knew in high school who was getting laid consistently was a misogynist. Was quite funny tbh
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/22 05:34 PM
2

r/titlegore
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/22 08:24 AM
-1

My sibling in Christ your OP doesn't say anything
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/22 11:23 AM
0

Again, they're literally the same thing. You've just used some weird language to kinda make it sound more fancy, but the only way for women to be more content being single is if women are "more okay choosing single over choosing a relationship that doesn’t net positive". Like it's the most meaningless distinction I've ever seen.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/22 01:46 AM
0

If women are more okay choosing singleness over a relationship that doesn't "value add" to her life, it means they're happier being single than being in a "non-value-add relationship". That's the same as saying they're more content being single than men are, because if men would rather be in a non-value-add relationship than be single, then men are less happy being single than women are. If you just rephrase your post to ask why men would rather be in non value add relationships than be single, …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/22 01:37 AM
1

It may seem identical They literally are the same thing. All you have to do is ask why men are less okay choosing single over a relationship that isn't net positive. It can come down to "men want sex and can't get it outside relationship", "men want emotional support and can't get it outside relationships", or anything else, but ultimately it still means they're less content being single
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/22 12:51 AM
14

the flip side the vast majority of men only messaged or swiped on the most attractive women. No, it's just men didn't swipe right on the ugliest of women. So like if you're above 20th percentile for women, you're still guaranteed loads of matches, and if you're a super attractive women, you're guaranteed even more. But the ugliest women get barely any matches, even less so than the ugliest men
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/22 04:02 PM
2

Nothing.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/22 12:27 PM
3

Because most psychology experiments don't have the funding to get a perfect cross sectional sample, so they use undergrads cuz universities have easy access to them (and they're all broke and will do it for a 5 dollar Amazon voucher), if they find a trend, then they might be able to get more funding for a better study (or a uni w better funding will see the study and do it themselves)
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/22 08:36 PM
13

Sure but the reverse is true as well no? Women frequently say "I'm not like this therefore this trend doesn't exist", which is as silly. At least this is a study. Yeah it probably shouldn't be extrapolated to the whole world, but it's still miles better than like, 90% of all discourse in this sub lol
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/22 08:32 PM
5

I think in your case it's possible that like, if you were a homeless druggy, most of the people you interested with were in similar boats or just sympathetic to you, and were not necessarily a representative cross section of women.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/22 12:30 AM
1

I'm happy to concede my initial wording was not an accurate portrayal of my thoughts lol. I wrote a paragraph that more precisely conveys my thoughts, but you're not engaging with that for some reason lol some and none are completely different words Yes, and sometimes, believe it or not, when an amount is small enough or unimportant enough, people use none instead of some. This is a rather common convention in English For example, you might sometimes hear "none of what you said made any sense", …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/22 07:38 PM
1

Contextually, the first part meant there are no exclusive benefits to a relationship because it was literally followed by "they can get all the same benefits through hookers and friends". Obviously it means I think some benefits exist. The only other issue here is using the word "all". I shouldn't have done that, my bad. Like if you want, imagine my initial comment was The overwhelming majority of benefits that can be obtained in a relationship can also be obtained by having friends and hookers.…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/22 04:17 PM
1

It's not the polar opposite. The polar opposite of "all benefits of a relationship can be gotten from friends and hookers" would be "every benefit in a relationship is impossible to get from hookers and friends". But I said "there are some minor benefits from relationships that can't be gotten through hookers and friends". Oh, you didn't literally mean polar opposite? Because words don't always have to be interpreted literally, and it's possible to mean one thing but say something slightly diffe…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/22 03:51 PM
1

I don't agree with her lol. Theres like a few tiny benefits that you don't get from friends and hookers that you get from a gf/wife but they're not worth it based on the monumentally extra effort required. Don't think that necessarily changes my overall stance, does it?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/22 01:07 PM
1

No because men are not dumb Disagree. I think people, by and large, are dumb. or, at the very least, aren't smart enough to totally avoid the possibility of man of us arriving at the same incorrect conclusion. The idea that men are perfectly rational to the point where, if a majority of men agree on something, it must mean that said something is the correct conclusion for them, is totally silly. Like it's a total cop out. Tell me why men SHOULD pursue relationships rather than hookers and friend…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/22 01:10 AM
1

Yeah it really depends on the woman. I remember I had a situationship with a girl and eventually ended it and began dating another girl, and the first girl started like, actively not laughing at my jokes. Which first hurt, cuz it made me think I wasn't funny and that she was only laughing cuz she was tryna date me or whatever, but then I told a joke and she like, actively stifled a laugh. That made me feel better haha.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/22 12:54 AM
2

Yes you don't get all the benefits. You can't go to hooker for life advice and to help you with emotional baggage and you can't go to your close friends for sex, whereas if you have a good gf/wife, she becomes a one stop shop of sorts. So not ALL the same benefits, but definitely comparable, and with MUCH less effort
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/22 12:43 AM
1

Is "men are dumb and easily influenced by pervasive social norms" not good enough? Also, again, the argument is about what is good for men. The fact that men do something doesn't mean it's good for them. "Why do men choose to do X over Y" is only a relevant discussion if we first agree that men SHOULD be doing Y over X.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/22 12:42 AM
1

Bro the argument is about whether or not the advantages outweigh the disadvantages, whether it's worth it to choose women over hookers. The fact that men make the wrong choice consistently can be attributed to basically anything and I'm not too interested in discussing that unless we first agree on whether or not they should be prioritising one over the other
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/22 04:46 PM
1

Because it's easier to do that lol
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/22 04:44 PM
1

The vast majority of men don't listen to those podcasters lmao wtf. Jordan Peterson probably has more listeners than all those podcasters combined and even his self improvement advice is very often "clean your room and fix yourself [so that youll be found attractive]". More men could do it if they want. Yes. I'm saying more men should want it but because they're placing too much value on relationships and sex, they don't. The whole argument here is "relative to the actual benefits that relations…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/22 09:39 AM
3

Because theyve effectively been gaslit into thinking they need one and that all their problems will be solved by having one. Remember how feminism pushed for women to become independent and to not derive their own value from men being attracted to them or from their ability to maintain a relationship? That sort of rhetoric was never pushed on boys, so most of us still have harmful views about ourselves and relationships. Like your argument seems circular to me. I'm going "men should stop pursuin…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/22 09:28 AM
3

The point is that most men shouldn't want relationships because the only benefit they have is placebo or made up, and they can get all the same benefits through hookers and friends
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/22 09:14 AM
8

The issue most people have is that womens "creepiness" radar realistically is fucking terrible. If it was good, surely women wouldn't be ending up in violent relationships as often as they do, right? (Sorry if that sounds callous). Like i know guys who are abusive cunts who have been in dozens of relationships and guys who wouldn't hurt a fly who've never gotten laid. So when the creepiness radar sucks and men who aren't creeps get labeled as such, and women aren't actually gaining anything from…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/22 04:01 PM
17

The thing about "much shorter lives" is a bit of a myth. Life expectancy was brought down by infant mortality, but if you lived past 5, there was a high chance of making it to 65. Which is still shorter, but not much shorter
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/22 12:48 PM
6

She was raised a super religious hijabi and we dated for like 18 months before we did anything, and we had 3 months of oral and fingering and whatnot till she felt comfortable enough for PiV.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/22 11:58 AM
6

My first was w the town bike and my second was w a virgin and apart from the first being better at deep throating, my second was better in basically every way the first time we fucked. She did then learn how to deep throat and then eventually she was better than my first in every way.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/22 10:24 AM
5

Nah it's really easy to be good in bed, most guys who aren't simply don't care to try, because they don't care about you calling them again. It's why hookup culture is inherently a bad deal for women
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/22 08:05 PM
6

You missed the point of my comment lol Redpill people say women have too high standards and should learn to "settle". This guy wrote a massive paragraph talking about why that's dumb but then said men have too high standards and implied they should lower them and "settle". In neither situation is anyone saying "anything less than 10/10 is settling".
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/22 11:32 PM
1

I cannot get wet or achieve an orgasm with a man I am not attracted to. I'm willing to believe that because the idea of being able to force yourself to find someone attractive seems intuitively wrong to me and the other guy didn't provide enough reasoning for me to go against my intuition I'm just saying your responses were sorta missing the point, and it'd be as effective to literally just go "you're totally wrong" lol
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/22 11:29 PM
15

Yeah so he's saying external factors have resulted in men having standards that lead to them being unfulfilled, with the implicit solution being that something should be done that would lower men's standards and allow them to be fulfilled. Similarly, redpill ppl argue that womens standards have been raised due to external factors and that leads to them being unfulfilled.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/22 10:23 PM
2

Yeah but that's a different response than saying "we don't want to force it". Like personally, I don't know if that guy is right. I don't think I could force myself to be attracted to fat girls for example, but I've also never tried so I don't know. I have once chosen a girl i found less attractive than another girl because the less attractive girl had more similar interests (but that relationship ended up being totally shit so that says a lot about my judgement) but I didn't find either of them…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/22 10:21 PM
1

We don’t want to force it. We don’t have to force lust or attraction, and men can’t negotiate or shame women into feeling lust for them. Yeah and the point he's making is that you can force it. If you don't want to force it, then he won't sympathise with your plight that is caused by you not wanting to force it, which he is within his rights to do (or not do, I guess).
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/22 10:07 PM
21

I feel like porn just ruined men’s physical attraction standards so everyone wants Stacy irl now instead of regular looking girls So you're saying men should lower their standards and settle?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/22 10:00 PM
1

Culturally enforced monogamy time 😎 /s Honestly, keep getting that chad dick girl, good for you. I don't care about what women (or men) should do, I just like to discuss what they DO do (haha doodoo) under the status quo
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/22 10:28 AM
29

No they're still irrational to complain about it. Like if you wanna continuously shag 9s and 10s and hope one of them falls in love with your amazing personality, go ahead. But then don't complain and malign all men when that strategy takes way longer than you expect, or, more probably, just doesn't work at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/22 01:15 PM
2

So i overall agree that women benefiting within patriarchy doesn't negate their oppression, but I do have an issue with your framing. Specifically, it's very common for feminists to reframe any example of female privilege in a way that makes women look like the victims. And while I'm not disagreeing that the cause of these privileges is normally patriarchal in nature, it's strange how the same concept is never applied to any form of male privilege. For example, we talk a lot about men dominating…
/r/MensRights09/04/21 09:42 PM
1

To be clear tho, framing UP, MP, and Bihar as just "3/28" is a bit disingenuous. Their combined population is about 30% of India. But yes, everything else is tcorrect
/r/MensRights09/04/21 09:30 PM
1

Yeah that also reinforces my point, which is that the existence of ugly men/women doesn't disprove women/men being extremely shallow
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/21 07:03 PM
2

You've moved goalposts to somewhere totally unrecognizable. Nobody was making any prescriptive claims, you were disagreeing over a descriptive claim.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/21 11:53 AM
1

That only works in non monogamous societies and, the West has only recently moved away from culturally enforced monogamy. Also, ugly women can give birth to ugly men even if the dad is hot. In fact, good looking women can have ugly babies with a good looking man. I definitely disagree that "women only want chads" is a bit of a silly assertion, but using the fact that ugly men exist isn't a valid refutation
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/21 11:52 AM
3

You might be right but it's because the standards women bend to are way easier to meet. The easiest example is that getting hench and shredded is way harder than harder than getting skinny. Or applying makeup is easier than like, growing taller.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/21 02:15 PM
2

I like high n count women cuz my dick is like 95th percentile in size which can only be appreciated if you've been through some dick lol
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/20 12:18 PM
1

There are even articles around the web that shows that the moment a woman starts making more money than the man is the moment the marriage starts to deteriorate leading to divorce. Source?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/20 12:21 PM
11

How someone looks is actually totally arbitrary. We arbitrarily decide what looks good and what doesn't. Sure theres often some evolutionary psychology at play, but ultimately it's socially constructed. And whenever we perceive one group of people as less attractive, on average, than the other, the conclusion that should be arrived at is some variation of "beauty standards are wack". If I said white women are prettier than black women, white men are more attractive than Indian men, etc, the resp…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/20 04:11 PM
2

How tall are you?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/20 08:32 PM
1

?? Nobody is saying we should remove people's choice you fucking numpty. We saying that some choices can and should be called stupid/brash/irrational etc. You have the right to refuse advances for whatever reason, but people have the right to call those reasons stupid. That being said, I don't think "I'm not looking for a relationship" is a stupid decision
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/20 01:34 AM
8

This is such a dumb argument lol. Anyone can say no for whatever reason, but that doesn't mean all reasons are free from criticism. If I rejected a girl because she rejected me 5 years ago when I was clapped, even though I still find her attractive rn, the reason for rejection would be purely based on ego. Which I'm allowed to do obviously. But it's still petty.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/20 09:35 AM
5

Be yourself is only good advice for a dude who gets laid frequently but can't get a LTR
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/20 12:47 AM
1

Because this entire thread is about what it feels like to like tall men, which almost necessarily requires a discussion of why they like tall men.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/20 10:17 PM
0

Socialism headass
/r/MensRights15/09/20 06:28 PM
1

I think this is a silly line of argumentation. I don't think anyone says ALL of it is external factors and modern feminism and women are the sole reason for their inability to pull. It's just it play a massive role. So taking two brothers with identical upbringing and different outcomes is like taking my dad, and saying he escaped abject poverty, therefore his 8 siblings who are still suck in poverty in Pakistan are stuck there solely because of personal failings
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/20 10:10 PM
8

This sounds really interesting. Do you have a link?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/20 09:45 PM
1

Exact same reaction lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/20 05:00 AM
3

Interestingly, that's not actually relevant. The fact that tinder, okcupid, etc are all disproportionately male is actually evidence for dating being harder for men in and of itself. All you have to do is ask yourself, WHY are they all disproportionately male (and often in very similar ratios).
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/20 11:53 PM
9

Okay ♥️
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/20 02:04 AM
24

That's not necessarily saying women owe anyone sex tho. If women stopped having sex altogether, that would technically be destroying society, and pointing that out isn't the same as saying women owe anyone sex, just that society would benefit if women wanted to have sex more often. That's a small but important distinction
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/20 01:59 AM
1

Male validation is a helluva drug
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/20 04:23 AM
0

Did the study control for the fact that the teenagers who have sex are often the teenagers who smoke and drink and do drugs?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/20 11:08 AM
1

"if you don't want to be a victim of a sex crime, take precautions" 🤔🤔🤔 I don't think that paper abortions are unethical Lol sorry then, idk what we're arguing about then lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/20 04:45 PM
1

Off topic, but I have no idea how guys are able to enjoy casual sex. If I were a guy, I would be too nervous about getting someone pregnant. I personally don't lol. Idk how women can enjoy casual sex cuz either cuz they should be worried about getting pregnant lol. Not the opportunity to become a human, just to have an active biological father. It does nothing to the fetus physically, it's still alive and can become a human with its needs. Sorry, phrasing. I meant become a human that has an acti…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/20 04:19 AM
1

I'm saying that if the father doesn't want to raise a child that he doesn't want, and the mother is aware of this, then she can exercise her bodily autonomy and abort. she still has the ability to choose what she wants. But this is just an additional external factor that she should consider
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/20 02:32 AM
1

There's too much misinterpretation in your argument. Lmao okay then
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/20 08:08 PM
1

??? Yes Nothing I said disagreed with that.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/20 08:03 PM
3

Well, it isn't a fetus who gets child supports, it's a child. The first one is okay as it just removes the fetus before it becomes a child, but the second one doesn't do it, it just shifts responsibility for it. When a father does a paper abortion, the fetus is being denied the opportunity to become a human and have an active father When a mother does an abortion, the fetus is being denied the opportunity to become a human full stop. If the former is bad, the latter is worse. Further, if the wom…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/20 05:10 PM
1

When the mother aborts the fetus, the fetus cannot grow up to become a human. You are therefore denying the fetus the opportunity to have a life, right? When the father does a paper abortion, he is denying the fetus the opportunity to grow up to become a human with support from its father. Either way, my point stands lol. And like I said, there is no new problem for women. They have as much opportunity to abort as previously. If they really think a child w/o a father would be difficult, they can…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/20 04:59 PM
5

I think you need to change how you're thinking about this. If you abort a fetus, you are denying it the opportunity to grow up. If you paper abort a fetus, you are denying it the opportunity to get a certain amount of income from its father. If the latter is morally bad, the former is morally worse. It's also entirely possible to at least improve upon the current situation. Rn, the father gets completely screwed over. In an alternative with paper abortions, it's possible for the father to get sc…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/20 09:06 AM
19

I want to know exactly what you're trying to convey. Are you trying to convey that because there are so many minute details and possibilities, that the solution must be to therefore always have the father on the hook for child support in what is probably the most sexist law in the developed world? Or do you generally want to know the tiny details? Because if it's the former, I'm firstly, not a lawmaker, and secondly, don't think that a new system that is unfair occasionally would be worse than a…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/20 07:41 AM
31

Its not hard to draft laws that account for this. Eg, women have the responsibility to inform the father by x, and fathers have to confirm or deny paper abortion by y. If woman fails to inform him by x, then he is not on the hook for financial support unless he consents
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/20 03:18 AM
1

Most of A being B does not necessarily imply that most of B is A.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/20 09:31 AM
1

When girls complain about fuccbois and whatnot, that's basically them complaining about polygyny, no?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/20 07:45 PM
1

Yes
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/20 05:27 PM
5

"YOUR BODY COUNT DOESNT INVALIDATE YOUR WORTH" "no not like that"
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/20 12:47 AM
1

You're telling me that toxic masculinity is enforced by what women are attracted to? I am shocked. So surprised. Never saw it coming
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/20 06:41 AM
1

A dog wouldn't do that (except for some really shitty breeds). Cats, on the other hand....
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/20 06:24 AM
1

Yes
/r/MensRights20/02/20 02:52 AM
-2

Imagine upvoting a YouTube comment with an anime avatar. How much do you guys want to bet this is some neckbeard roleplaying as a woman?
/r/MensRights19/02/20 01:12 PM
2

Menslib is disgusting so no thanks
/r/MensRights18/02/20 04:12 AM
0

I literally didn't mention Nazis, and don't call me a liberal. And in the US, leftists support freedom but none support not selling/baking cakes for gay people. So it is mostly a left Vs right issue.
/r/MensRights18/02/20 04:10 AM
-21

r/mensrights: we aren't a right leaning group! Also r/mensrights: downvotes a comment that is pretty much only disagreed with by right leaning groups. Nice.
/r/MensRights17/02/20 01:35 PM
1

This is big brain time
/r/MensRights02/02/20 05:17 PM
1

That was just an example. Good on the mods for removing it. Just go through this thread, there's a bunch of people commending stonetoss' comics that you also rightfully condemn.
/r/MensRights31/01/20 07:50 PM
1

Literally in this thread someone linked a stonetoss comic that implies foreigners are an invasive species to me, after I said that im a child of Pakistani immigrants in Ireland.
/r/MensRights31/01/20 12:51 PM
1

I never disagreed that this comic wasn't spot on for fucks sake why is everyone so dense? Just like someone won't justify their vegetarianism with Hitler quotes, we shouldn't justify our anti circumcision stance with stonetoss comics (obviously stonetoss is not as bad as Hitler, but you get what im trying to say, I hope). And FWIW, I used to like this sub. I use to think that the reason MRAs are vilified is because we call out mainstream feminism. But it's very often become such a cesspool of ho…
/r/MensRights31/01/20 05:14 AM
2

Yes but we are on Reddit, full of neurotic creeps. And also there's a moral argument against posting the work of people who are bad people. Assuming you agree stonetoss is Nazi, posting his work indirectly supports him, which is bad independent of any optics.
/r/MensRights16/01/20 06:55 PM
1

Okay then? Are you aware that saying 'lol bias source' isn't an argument? If the source has issues, then point them out. Like, if someone posted a stonetoss comic that I disagreed with, I wouldn't say 'its stonetoss so I dismiss this', I'd explain why it's wrong. In this case, for instance, I actually agree with stonetoss' comic. Ironically, you are doing the very thing that other people are wrongly accusing me of: dismissing a point of view because it's made by someone I mostly disagree with.
/r/MensRights16/01/20 03:49 PM
1

Yes I would lol. I'd read the specific article and explain why it's wrong, because it's very easy to do that with conservapedia article. As it stands, the rationalwiki article I initially linked is literally just a compilation of stonetoss' work. Idk how you can complain about that.
/r/MensRights16/01/20 02:15 PM
1

The rational wiki source is literally a collection of his comics lol. Like "waaa bias source" but the bias source is literally "this is the stuff he has made". You can see what he made and judge yourself. Also, https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Essay:Common_criticisms_of_RationalWiki You should try reading sources you disagree with more often
/r/MensRights16/01/20 08:49 AM
3

I didn't obsessively scroll through stonetoss' work lol, I've just seen it a lot in uh, problematic internet spheres when I used to be part of them. And I never said I am unable to agree with my enemies? I literally acknowledged that stonetoss is right in this comic. But I would also agree with Hitler's stance on vegetarianism, I'm not gonna use his quotes of vegetarianism when I talk to people about why I'm vegetarian. It's just bad optics. If you want MRA to be taken seriously by more people, …
/r/MensRights15/01/20 09:17 PM
5

People would recognise him cuz he has a distinctive art style and has produced some incredibly racist trash. But my Hitler comparison was more simply to illustrate that sometimes, agreeing with one specific point someone makes isn't enough to use them to prove your point. Apart from giving exposure to a 'bad' person, its also terrible optics. People are less likely to take MRAs seriously if you post stonetoss.
/r/MensRights11/01/20 01:50 AM
0

My point about not supporting a Nazi is also true for not supporting someone who makes inherently racist, anti Semitic, and holocaust denying comics. Like I agree with this specific posts point, but I also agree with Hitler on one or two things. I'm not gonna quote Hitler to explain or prove my points tho. Similarly, I'm not gonna quote someone who produces anti Semitic content to prove my point. And the thing is, even if you disagree with me, it's bad optics. People will see this post and assoc…
/r/MensRights11/01/20 01:47 AM
4

You're an idiot. I very clearly said I agree with him in this context. But I also agreed with Hitler in some contexts, that doesn't mean I'm going to use his work or quotes as an example of my ideology
/r/MensRights11/01/20 01:40 AM
3

You're...not even trying to hide it anymore lol.
/r/MensRights11/01/20 01:38 AM
2

No but rampant anti semitism does. And thinking of races as dangerous is a very Nazi like thing to do. But even if he's not a Nazi. I'd argue that we shouldn't be promoting the work of a racist, anti Semitic, holocaust denier either.
/r/MensRights11/01/20 01:37 AM
0

Did you read my comment history? How far did you have to get to see I'm Irish? Cuz if you went a bit further you'd see I'm a son of Pakistani immigrants so I think I'm a bit too brown to be a Nazi xx
/r/MensRights10/01/20 04:59 PM
0

Wow how long did it take you to come up with that witty response?
/r/MensRights10/01/20 04:45 PM
2

Ayt okay mate sorry keep defending the guy who made these comics: https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/File:StoneToss-billionaires-comic-1.png https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/File:ST_comic_2.png http://stonetoss.com/comic/pibble-quibble/
/r/MensRights10/01/20 03:33 PM
0

Firstly, that guy never made a claim that stonetoss is a Nazi, just that your argument for him not being a Nazi was shit. Like if someone told me cheating is immoral because the Bible condemns it, I can criticise how he came to the conclusion whilst agreeing with the conclusion. Secondly, stonetoss is a Nazi (or at the very least, a racist, sexist, holocaust skeptic, anti Semitic individual). https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/StoneToss Examples that page did not include: http://stonetoss.com/comic/p…
/r/MensRights10/01/20 03:31 PM
-1

I never liked star wars tbh. The whole series is overrated, including OT. Also omg I love happy tree friends! This is my favourite episode: https://youtu.be/dQw4w9WgXcQ
/r/MensRights10/01/20 03:19 PM
17

I agree and never said or implied otherwise. But i wouldn't post Hitler quotes about vegetarianism in an animal rights sub, even if Hitler might agree with me on vegetarianism.
/r/MensRights10/01/20 03:02 PM
-4

... Is this an attempt to be clever? what was the point of your comment? What were you trying to convey? 3/10 worst troll I've ever encountered. Score inflated by the fact that this troll attempt was so bad I wasn't sure if it was a troll
/r/MensRights10/01/20 12:39 PM
1

So we must disagree with someone because of what they are Lol wut? The sneaky thing you're doing here, intentionally or unintentionally, is implying that being a Nazi is just something someone is. You're also implying I'm disagreeing with stonetoss. He's right in this instance, but because of who he is (i.e., a literal Nazi), I condemn anyone who uses his work to prove their point. If you want evidence that he is a literal Nazi, feel free to ask. But fwiw, I've never been branded a racist sexist…
/r/MensRights10/01/20 11:00 AM
11

MRA: why do people associate us with far right 4channers? We advocate for a legitimate cause! Also (some) MRAs: unironically post stonetoss' art
/r/MensRights10/01/20 08:34 AM
1

Username checks out
/r/MensRights10/01/20 07:42 AM
-6

Stonetoss is a nazi Édit: stonetoss being a nazi doesn't mean he's wrong about this comic. But just like I wouldn't want a sub about vegetarianism to quote fucking Hitler, I don't want this sub to quote other people of dubious character. If you want to quibble about whether or not he's a Nazi, go ahead lol. But you'll be defending the character of the guy who made these comics: https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/File:StoneToss-billionaires-comic-1.png https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/File:ST_comic_2.png…
/r/MensRights10/01/20 07:42 AM
1

There are places in the UK where talking to a women without her permission is now considered a hate crime. How many times have you been to these places? Or to the UK even? Or can you give me a source for this claim?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/20 03:17 PM
3

So that's probably where this disagreement stems from: what does attractive mean? In this context, I would say this means sexually attractive. And sexually attractive, to me, means someone you want to have sex with. Men want to have sex with pretty much any woman who isnt morbidly obese, therefore all women who aren't morbidly are sexually attractive at some level. Obviously some are more sexually attractive than others, but in general, the only thing you need to be considered sexually attractiv…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/20 04:43 PM
2

That's a ridiculously high threshold for deeming someone sexually attractive. If I have more than a ONS with someone, it's because of their personality, ideals, etc. I have no sexual attraction to those in any way tho. Those guys who you're talking about wouldn't fuck someone with a BMI of 40, for example. So obviously it's not just a matter of sleeping with anyone regardless of how attractive they are. And in that regard, men have a lower threshold for how attractive a woman has to be, and that…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/20 03:57 PM
3

.... That's fair, but then you can't use your experience to disprove OP, because your actual experience (in OLD) supports OP.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/20 03:21 PM
-1

Make a tinder account or go out more lol
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/20 02:34 PM
2

Those look interesting. If only they had enough pixels for me to able to actually read them. Shame
/r/MensRights29/12/19 04:12 PM
3

In California, I'm not sure.
/r/MensRights29/12/19 07:15 AM
27

Race based affirmative action is illegal in California so this should be a fairly open and shut case. I look forward to hearing about this on the news, if it's real.
/r/MensRights29/12/19 01:36 AM
2

What? How is boko haram related to this? Like are you trying to remind me how shitty men and boys have it in this world? I know that. What I'm saying is that when the people who advocate for men's rights are absolute idiots who blame their inability to detect satire on the world around them, it discredits the rest of the legitimate cause. You're doing this really interesting thing, where you're asserting what feminists believe and using that to show that their idiot hypocrites. You're saying tha…
/r/MensRights27/12/19 06:23 PM
1

I would like to take this opportunity to point out that your stupidity is part of the reason people don't take men's rights seriously. Like just shut the fuck up and admit you fell for obvious satire because you're an idiot who doesn't understand feminist perspectives. Don't try and say "it's not MY fault i was duped! It's feminists' faults for being irrational! The fact that I personally believed it says more about a whole ideology rather than anything about myself and my perception of said ide…
/r/MensRights27/12/19 05:33 PM
2

I agree. Criticising people for manspreading is stupid. What's your point?
/r/MensRights27/12/19 05:28 PM
2

This is incredible. You're trying to justify the fact that you got fucking duped by something that was satire, that I, for some reason, was able to pin as satire immediately. But under feminist dogma, you can't ignore manspreading because it physically takes up space. If I close my eyes, the manspreading still has consequences because it takes up more space. The fact that feminists are hypocrite because women use their bags to take up space is not relevant to the fact that manspreading, in and o…
/r/MensRights27/12/19 03:10 PM
0

No, manspreading, if real, actually has a 'tangible' consequence that cannot just be ignored (it takes up extra space). This is so obviously fake that i ctrl f'd satire and fake to make sure I wasn't the only person who noticed. The only way you could think this to not be satire is if you completely villofy your political opponents to the point where you think that they are literally vegetables.
/r/MensRights27/12/19 10:46 AM
8

https://www.smbc-comics.com/comic/aaaah
/r/MensRights26/12/19 11:13 PM
1

The fact that she wanted to date me was enough. Then I realised I'd rather be alone than be with someone as controlling as her, so I eventually noped out
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/19 05:55 PM
1

so the argument you're making is that anyone who votes for democrats does so because they're clamouring for handouts? Or is there something I'm missing? If that is the argument you're making, on what basis are you making it? And if that's not the argument you're making, then why does immigrants voting for gop disprove the idea of them clamouring for handouts?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/19 10:46 PM
1

Lol is there anything I can show you that would prove that immigrants aren't clamouring for handouts? And the two party system is a game theoretic inevitability based on how the US voting system was originally conceived. I have no idea how you could possibly blame immigrants for FPTP and the 2 party system lmao. Are you even arguing in good faith? Because your arguments are so bad and obviously wrong it's almost like you're trolling.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/19 01:02 PM
4

Hijab ≠ fgm you absolute waffle iron. The defense for hijab is "if they want to wear it as part of their culture and it isn't hurting anyone, then let them. They shouldn't be forced to wear it, as they are in countries like Iran, but banning them from wearing it in the west is infringing on their right to wear what they want". That defense doesn't work for fgm because it's predicated on it being something that's non harmful. Fgm is harmful, so it's not defended under the guise of "their culture"…
/r/MensRights18/12/19 09:55 AM
1

You're an idiot lol. Immigrants use less handouts than locals. https://www.cato.org/publications/immigration-research-policy-brief/immigration-welfare-state-immigrant-native-use-rates But even if you're right about immigrants and handouts. Your argument sounds very much like a criticism of 2 party system. People who want handouts need to vote democrat who are also the sjw party (lol), even if they don't want to. So what's actually happening is the two party system is partially responsible for pr…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/19 09:51 AM
1

... Immigrants don't necessarily vote sjw. They're not a homogeneous group of people. Latin American immigrants are actually often strongly religious so would vote against sjw gender stuff. And saying "supporting open borders makes you sjw because it causes sjws to gain more power" is like saying "talking about sjws, even negatively, makes you sjw, because talking about sjws gives them attention and publicity, which gives them more power".
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/19 10:15 PM
1

2 things First, how will sjw politics inevitably arise from increased immigration? Second, even if I agreed with you on that, this was never being discussed. I was replying to you heavily implying that supporting immigration/open borders makes you inherently SJW, and I was showing how that is completely bullshit. Even if more immigration may cause more SJW politics, supporting more immigration doesn't mean you are an SJW or you support SJWs
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/19 06:50 AM
1

That's really cool but I was replying to the sentiment that open borders/increasing immigration is inherently an SJW thing, when in reality neoliberals, a group that most SJWs would dislike, actually want open borders/increased immigration too. Your understanding of political viewpoints that aren't your own, and how they differ from each other and what they have in common, is very lacking.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/19 09:25 PM
1

r/neoliberal is completely against she cancel culture and all the bullshit lol, actual SJWs hate neolibs. Believe it or not, there is (arguably) a pure economic reason to support open borders. I don't agree with them, but they support open borders and immigration and are not sjws at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/19 07:31 AM
1

r/neoliberal would like a word
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/19 10:15 AM
38

This seems so weird. Did he ask, and before they had the opportunity, he reached orgasm? Was he wanking BEFORE they walked in, and was about to climax when they walked in? Or did he ask, and then started wanking and in the time between starting and finishing, they didn't say no? So many possibilities
/r/MensRights31/10/19 12:40 PM
1

Then why didnt he say he's Canadian and not from like Montreal or wherever
/r/PussyPassDenied22/10/19 04:08 PM
1

I'm not flexing, I'm expressing my awe at Americans such as the dude I'm replying to.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/10/19 04:07 PM
1

Americans are so incredible in their lack of understanding of how the rest of the world works it actually amazes me
/r/PussyPassDenied21/10/19 12:47 PM
1

Yes of course it's untrue. There could be discussion about life holding incels back vs incels holding themselves back, but ultimately that's not even why you're so terribly wrong. Under the paradigm of privilege being based on wants and desires, poor Christian in Pakistan who only cares about devoting himself to Christ and doesn't give a shit about anything else, including the religious persecution he will face, is more privileged than a middle class straight white male incel in the richest coun…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/19 02:21 AM
1

Lol what the fuck is this line of reasoning. You're basically defining privilege as ability to get what you want. By this metric, incels and gamers are literally the most oppressed minority because all they want is to get laid and oppress women but that's almost impossible for them and therefore they have the least privilege in western society.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/19 07:38 PM
2

The argument being made isn't that this woman is a meanie, but that if a guy did this, he would be considered a meanie. Neither should be seen as meanies
/r/MensRights27/08/19 07:25 PM
1

I agree, but using such language can make you come across as a chauvinist which pushes people away. If you want mras to become mainstream and acceptable, mincing your words a bit is smart
/r/MensRights27/08/19 10:22 AM
2

While I agree with the sentiment, you probably could've worded it better to not come across as chauvinist. As someone else said in a far better way, half hearted suicide attempts and failed suicide attempts are cries for help, whereas guys don't bother crying for help because of a variety of reasons (one of those reasons is what some would call toxic masculinity but w/e)
/r/MensRights26/08/19 09:36 PM
6

The thing about arguments like that its basically irrefutable by design, so using it back on them is always amusing.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/08/19 05:03 AM
-1

Real talk, it's likely the video game industry and how it's basically exclusively marketed towards boys. That is at least one factor
/r/PussyPassDenied21/08/19 05:01 AM
-1

You're literally why mras get shat on lmao. Your perception of feminism and what it actually is are very different. But to be fair, the problem is "what it actually is" is a very vague concept. There's no feminist Bible per se. So you have feminists like the og comment in the Tumblr post, and feminists like the reply. You have feminists like me, who acknowledge that there are social pressures on both men and women that are harmful and boys often get the short end of the stick, and you have femin…
/r/MensRights23/07/19 11:06 AM
-1

Found u/goodmod's alt
/r/MensRights23/07/19 10:56 AM
6

It's actually worse. Even if we assume that they're right, it's internalised misogyny and those people were brainwashed by evil society... Then the white men are also brainwashed by the evil society and villifying white men who are AGAISNT abortion makes no sense as they're also victims of societal brainwashing.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/05/19 09:00 AM
1

Isn't really men's rights. AFAIK, the man won because the employer was exploiting a law that allowed for gender discrimination against men simply because the man was part of a group she didn't like.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/03/18 02:12 PM
2

Intentionally being ignorant is always good. I disagree with the post, but you're not doing anyone any favours by behaving like a child
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/18 01:52 PM
4

so instead of addressing his points you made a caricature of what he said? 10/10 would laugh again
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/18 01:51 PM
1

Good guy moderator
/r/MensRights14/11/17 02:38 AM
4

Whos Judith butler?
/r/MensRights11/11/17 01:56 PM
1

One word mate TERFs
/r/MensRights20/10/17 04:19 PM
1

Yeah but.... Pockets
/r/PussyPassDenied15/10/17 02:34 PM
1

Link to you rebutting some feminist talking points? I don't believe that it's possible for them to upvote that. No offense
/r/MensRights29/09/17 02:28 PM
-7

Yeah it's true there is a severe disparity between female and male sentences. But in this case, the main thing that got her off Scott free was her status rather than gender. Gender probably helped, but status helped a lot more
/r/MensRights26/09/17 04:01 PM
1

Well yeah, but the poor part is far more important. A man of her status would also likely be let off Scott free
/r/MensRights26/09/17 01:33 PM
3

Oh wow. Jesus. They told him to smile and he didn't? Wow. Ouch. The hypocrisy is actually causing me pain. Send help
/r/MensRights24/09/17 01:14 PM
1

Commenting to see the answer
/r/MensRights23/09/17 06:57 AM
2

I believe our official law for rape defines it as the act of non consenting penetration. So it does nothing to protect men Source; u/originalspacepirate
/r/MensRights22/09/17 03:19 PM
7

That Harvard gazette article is technically true. If you made computer programming look more interactive, social, etc. more girls would probably do it. The problem is, is that possible, would it be lying, and why don't we make fields that women dominate look more thing orieted, why don't we make the tough and dirty jobs that men dominate look more social?
/r/MensRights16/09/17 06:21 AM
3

Bollocks. Have these people even studied physics ever? Like, at all?
/r/MensRights16/09/17 06:18 AM
15

The guy, like millions of other men, may not be taking his own rape seriously because he's heard all his life that men can't be raped. This part is interesting. While I agree with it, the interesting thing to note is that a lot of the damage of rape is psychological, but when the victim doesn't take it seriously, they are probably less likely to suffer from stuff like PTSD and whatnot. So by having this stigma around male rape, we've made it so that men often don't suffer the psychological damag…
/r/MensRights14/09/17 02:49 AM
2

I don't consider myself and MRA, but there are valid reasons to oppose feminism, but saying that feminists can't be reasoned with them beyond arrogant
/r/MensRights09/09/17 06:59 AM
7

No, based of the fact that nobody will fuck him so it's obvious that they're the problem and not him
/r/MensRights09/09/17 01:42 AM
10

Yes you can you fucking moron. The majority of feminists aren't extreme. The majority of feminists don't disregard opinions from men with "male privilige". At least in my experience.
/r/MensRights09/09/17 01:40 AM
7

This comment was 3rdd by controversial, I think this post got invaded by red pillers more than usual and upvotes that abomination of a comment
/r/MensRights09/09/17 01:37 AM
2

Stop being so childish and giving this sub a bad name.
/r/MensRights09/09/17 01:29 AM
2

OOOOOOhhhhhh, you're trolling. That was subtle. I actually thought that you were retarded. Well played.
/r/MensRights04/09/17 11:02 AM
2

.... Are you serious? Anyone reading this would have enough intelligence to determine that you have zero arguments other than "my dodgy way of arguing". I have actually lived in the middle east, so I actually have experience. My facts are not dodgy or dicey, they are factually correct and would definitely stand up to your scrutiny. My arguing is not dodgy in any sense of the word. The only thing dodgy here is the person who is bringing no arguments or facts to the table apart from "your arguing …
/r/MensRights04/09/17 10:20 AM
2

I'm not sealioning, you're just not making any point other than "how dare you imply men also suffer".
/r/MensRights04/09/17 09:08 AM
1

What are you even saying? You, or someone else, said something along the lines "waaah can't you see men have it worse", which is clearly mocking.
/r/MensRights04/09/17 09:02 AM
2

I'm not even sure what your point is..? "Don't you feel gross pointing out facts"? And I didn't try to weasel out of any of my own bullshit because I don't spout bullshit. Please indicate what bullshit I espoused and I will explain why it is not bullshit.
/r/MensRights04/09/17 09:01 AM
1

He didn't skew statistics...? I was replying to you basically mocking him and implying that he was obsessed with proving that men have it worse, and was just pointing out that the other person started it.
/r/MensRights04/09/17 08:57 AM
2

Well, the idea that any society can be based on misogyny is ridiculous. This isn't like racism, where whites come and hate the blacks, this is men and women, who have for all of history co existed. So for every shit thing that women suffer due to constricted gender roles, men also suffer. This isn't an oppressive Olympics, and i would caution a guess at women do have it slightly worse than men in the middle east, but the middle East is shit for men as well. There's no denying that.
/r/MensRights04/09/17 08:56 AM
6

Looser Sums it up, tbf
/r/MensRights04/09/17 08:24 AM
16

It's easy. While we're at it, don't get pregnant with a guy you don't trust and you won't need an abortion!
/r/MensRights04/09/17 08:20 AM
1

That's when a child is involved, and that's because if a dad opts to take custody and is given custody, then he sure as hell is a competent motherfucker with a stable job. So that's why.
/r/MensRights04/09/17 08:18 AM
2

She started it tbf
/r/MensRights04/09/17 08:17 AM
1

Gottem
/r/MensRights04/09/17 08:16 AM
3

Isis wants "justice", MRAs want "justice" MRAs are literally Isis. Is that what we're doing now? But seriously, Isis also has a creepy enthusiasm for "justice" for men commiting crimes. Like, for every one execution of a woman in Iran, there are 50 executions of men. There is a similar pattern all throughout the middle East. It's harder to find statistics for Isis, but you'd expect them to be more extreme but have similar ratios because they subscribe to a similar ideology, just more radical.
/r/MensRights04/09/17 08:14 AM
1

I cannot believe you actually believe what you're saying.
/r/MensRights04/09/17 08:09 AM
0

Lolwut
/r/MensRights04/09/17 08:00 AM
1

Exactly. By allowing people to voice "bad opinions", we uphold some dignity and honesty, but it gives us a bad rep. And I believe that having a good rep is more important to allow bigoted opinions from subs like TRP
/r/MensRights03/09/17 07:16 PM
1

Red pillers cucks ruin this sub's reputation. Imo the mods should consider taking a more pro active stance in banning these idiots, but im not sure how
/r/MensRights03/09/17 02:13 PM
1

Can the individual bio father give up rights to the child?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/17 02:45 PM
1

But that's pretty unfair. The woman can choose to never have to give birth and hence can completely dissasociate herself with the child. Seeing as the father cannot abort a child, he shouldnt have to pay child support if he wants to completely dissasociate himself with the child.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/17 02:44 PM
4

And this is why people call r/mesnrights a hate sub. Despite bringing up pressing issues that men face in society, the most upvoted posts are usually useless strawmen that are in no way productive.
/r/MensRights01/09/17 04:00 PM
1

((((((((they))))))))) Ftfy
/r/MensRights30/08/17 02:32 PM
1

I think what he's saying is that some of the stuff feminists complain about is bs/and or blown WAAAY out of proportion (the pay gap, college campus rape) and that people begin to believe that these issues are actually as sexist and discriminatory as they seem. Which is a shit comparison even if you agree that wage gap and college campus rape are indeed non issues/blown out of proportion
/r/MensRights30/08/17 02:29 PM
4

What the hell is this shitpost?
/r/MensRights28/08/17 03:03 PM
13

That's because actual MRAs don't like this shitposting and don't upvote it. Most of the time.
/r/MensRights28/08/17 03:01 PM
1

But what if she believes that being able to write code is as essential as the math taught in schools? After all, the same argument could be made that forcing maths drives students away from doing maths. A lot of the time, children often don't like doing something because they're not good at it. Once they improve at it, they begin to like it more. It's why I think it is justified for her to make sure her daughter learns how to code. Once she gets good at it, she can choose whether she wants to do…
/r/MensRights27/08/17 04:56 PM
13

Link to the bleacher report?
/r/PussyPassDenied27/08/17 01:26 PM
7

That again
/r/MensRights16/08/17 03:49 PM
3

Yeah im talking about that, but that point didnt really make sense and was really anecdotal.
/r/MensRights14/08/17 08:07 PM
6

The reason he was posting it was because google diversity programs only work based on the assumption that there is a gender gap in stem because of social pressures, so he used science and statistics to suggest otherwise. The excellent thing about statistics is that they do not apply to the individual. On average, men are more likely to be inferior at emotional expression, but that does not imply that my emotional expressios is inferior to my mom's. What it does imply, however, is that if you too…
/r/MensRights14/08/17 06:14 PM
12

There is not a single scientifically incorrect statement he made in that, except for when he was on about castrated boys. Prove me wrong, but first youll have to read the memo.
/r/MensRights14/08/17 06:09 PM
3

On the bright side, a lot of the comments replying to him are pointing out his idiocy
/r/MensRights13/08/17 09:37 PM
1

Identify as female Profit
/r/MensRights11/08/17 07:35 PM
0

Pretty sure its cuz mods of trollx are lazy
/r/MensRights11/08/17 08:17 AM
1

I disagree, but its pretty hard, and generally pointless, to argue over something as subjective as a justified reaction, so ill just leave it here. Have a good one!
/r/MensRights09/08/17 06:58 PM
4

You misunderstand. The person i was responding to was calling mras hypocrite. It would only be hypocrisy if they also believed that men in the same scenario expressing their emotions in that way would not be crybabies. If men were in the same scenario and reacted similarly id call them crybabies as well. Therefore, not a hypocrite. Whether or not it is crybaby like behaviour to react in that way is debatable, but its not hypocrisy if i apply it to men and women.
/r/MensRights09/08/17 06:45 PM
16

Re: first half of your comment . It is my preference to rebut and refute, however, most men who advocate for men being allowed to express themselves wouldn't avoid work just because of a memo. Essentially, the peoplre criticising them for being crybabies would also do the same if men were in that position (ie, abstaining from going to work because of a factually correct memo). When mras advocate for men to be allowed to express emotion, they basically want to address the double standard that is …
/r/MensRights09/08/17 06:04 PM
53

I sort of see where youre coming from, but i politely disagree, mainly because of a number of false equivalencies. 1) We ask for the ability to talk about our feelings, to show and say openly what is harming us without telling us that we should shut up and 'man up'. These women feel they need to take the day off, what does it matter what the reason is? the reason why there is a problem with this is that men, such as myself, who say they would prefer to be allowed to express themselves emotionall…
/r/MensRights09/08/17 04:39 PM
1

They do count as minorities, problem is Affirmative Action actually discriminates against asians, jews and whites.
/r/MensRights07/08/17 04:54 PM
2

Equality quotas basically only helps african americans and latinos. Asians, jews and whites normally suffer because of "equality quotas".
/r/MensRights07/08/17 04:51 PM
1

I agree. Most white people in positions of power worked for those positions of power, so media should stfu.
/r/MensRights07/08/17 10:02 AM
6

why is that California stat relevant? its not. Jews honestly do so much better because of their culture that heavily values education and hard work. i would know, some of my closest friends are jews, and some of them did not have internet access in their homes, despite being wealthy, until they were already in college. they value education so much that they actively often prevent their children from distractions that would hinder their education. if you look at why legacy admissions became a thi…
/r/MensRights06/08/17 04:52 PM
0

well, most jews work their asses off for those positions of power. they have a culture that has heavy emphasis on education and the like. so i really dont see the problem...?
/r/MensRights06/08/17 04:24 PM
6

can you give me an example of the good parts of third wave feminism? because ive struggled to see it,and i believe even if there are good parts of third wave feminism, the negatives overwhelmingly outweigh the positives
/r/MensRights06/08/17 04:21 PM
34

Amy schumer described herself as witty and charismatic? LMAO thats funny. She should be a stand up comedian.
/r/MensRights01/08/17 07:37 PM
1

Feminists often look at mens' issues through a lens that makes women victim. For example, in family courts, men get screwed over. Feminists look at this and say "its bc women are seen caregivers thats why". They apply this logic, or toxic masculinity, to any and every issue men face in society. However, what they dont realise is we can do the exact same. We can say that the reason men get fucked over in divorce court is because they are seen as the provider. Then we can say that the wage gap hap…
/r/MensRights30/07/17 09:50 AM
1

Lmao. He mentioned it in passing by saying "people may be offended by the lack of diversity " or something of the sort. Do you know why? Because it gets more visits. He understands this "tirggered" culture everyone has, including people here, and capitalised on it by putting a statement at the end that in no way insinuates his displeaure at lack of diversity, but will ruffle enough feathers to increase traffic.
/r/MensRights24/07/17 06:48 PM
1

Because it gets more visits. They undertsand this "tirggered" culture everyone has, including people here, and capitalised on it by putting a statement at the end that in no way insinuates his displeaure at lack of diversity, but will ruffle enougg feathers to increase traffic.
/r/MensRights24/07/17 06:46 PM
-1

This sub isnt a bigoted hate sub. Go fuck off to r/T_D
/r/MensRights17/07/17 08:36 PM
56

This sub is literally cancer and also pretty misogynistic. Edit: i just got banned from twox for commenting here. Wth
/r/PussyPassDenied14/07/17 09:56 AM
1

Can someone link to the actual study?
/r/MensRights11/07/17 10:35 PM
2

Technically, women are more likely to try and commit suicide, they just fail way more often because of reasons.
/r/MensRights11/07/17 07:44 AM
2

Link to the original, Swedish article
/r/MensRights10/07/17 08:41 AM
4

Wow. This poster is sexist, vitriolic, and is a perfect embodiment of the patriarchy. Why is a woman taking up the seat with her bag? That is generalisation amd sexism to the extreme. Furthermore, a male is the victim of the bag taking up the seat. This is victimising men which is what the patriarchy seeks to do; to make men feel that they are being oppressed by women suxh that they revolt and massacre all the women. This is also what hitler did; he made the Germans think that jews were oppressi…
/r/MensRights06/07/17 07:33 PM
5

Its literally called "women and gender studies".
/r/PussyPassDenied04/07/17 09:02 PM
2

https://pmc.gov.au/resource-centre/domestic-policy/going-blind-see-more-clearly-unconscious-bias-australian-public-services-shortlisting-processes http://mobile.abc.net.au/news/2017-06-30/bilnd-recruitment-trial-to-improve-gender-equality-failing-study/8664888?pfmredir=sm First link is the study, second is an article summarising results by a news outlet
/r/MensRights03/07/17 09:01 PM
3

https://pmc.gov.au/resource-centre/domestic-policy/going-blind-see-more-clearly-unconscious-bias-australian-public-services-shortlisting-processes
/r/MensRights03/07/17 08:57 PM
2

For people who cant tolerate the cancer that is a blog masquerading as journalism; http://mobile.abc.net.au/news/2017-06-30/bilnd-recruitment-trial-to-improve-gender-equality-failing-study/8664888?pfmredir=sm And link to the study https://pmc.gov.au/resource-centre/domestic-policy/going-blind-see-more-clearly-unconscious-bias-australian-public-services-shortlisting-processes
/r/MensRights03/07/17 08:57 PM
3

http://mobile.abc.net.au/news/2017-06-30/bilnd-recruitment-trial-to-improve-gender-equality-failing-study/8664888?pfmredir=sm Better website
/r/MensRights03/07/17 08:54 PM
7

http://mobile.abc.net.au/news/2017-06-30/bilnd-recruitment-trial-to-improve-gender-equality-failing-study/8664888?pfmredir=sm Better website
/r/MensRights03/07/17 08:53 PM
8

http://mobile.abc.net.au/news/2017-06-30/bilnd-recruitment-trial-to-improve-gender-equality-failing-study/8664888?pfmredir=sm Better source
/r/MensRights03/07/17 08:52 PM
12

Here's a link to a website that is not breitbart if anyone wants it. http://mobile.abc.net.au/news/2017-06-30/bilnd-recruitment-trial-to-improve-gender-equality-failing-study/8664888?pfmredir=sm
/r/PussyPassDenied01/07/17 05:48 PM
4

Im not attacking you, im trying to understand your perspective. I apologise if i come off as hostile, but I'll leave you alone now.
/r/MensRights27/06/17 04:12 PM
1

Im not attacking you, im trying to understand your perspective. I apologise if i come off as hostile, but I'll leave you alone now.
/r/MensRights27/06/17 04:12 PM
5

No. I read all of your comment. The first part which expalined why comparing "grab em by the pussy" and "part and parcel" is wrong, and the second part which explains why putting up with terrorism is wrong. I agree with you actually. Equating grab em the pussy and part and parcel quote is wrong because when people quote Saadiq Khan, they misquote him, whereas the grab em by the pussy is simply taken out of context. I also agree that putting up with terrorism is never acceptable, but Saadiq Khan …
/r/MensRights27/06/17 04:10 PM
0

Did you just read the first paragraph of my response and then stop? Because in the second paragraph i showed you what he actually he said, and it was in no way saying "we should put up woth terrorism"
/r/MensRights27/06/17 03:12 PM
2

Im assuming youre mocking what Saadiq Khan "said", which was blown out of proportion by the right, much like "grab em by the pussy" was blown out of proportion by the left. Saadiq Khan actually said : "Part and parcel of living in a great global city is you’ve got to be prepared for these things, you’ve got to be vigilant, you’ve got to support the police doing an incredibly hard job. We must never accept terrorists being successful, we must never accept that terrorists can destroy our life or d…
/r/MensRights27/06/17 03:06 PM
1

Ahh k. Thanks for the clarification
/r/MensRights26/06/17 06:32 PM
2

But what about the "before he removed his veil and showed her his smile" part? Because you can see your wife's smile before making the commitment.
/r/MensRights26/06/17 06:16 PM
7

Someone explain second-last one please
/r/MensRights26/06/17 05:52 PM
25

And also internalised misogyny and patriarchy
/r/MensRights18/06/17 01:00 AM
1

FYI, the divorce statistic is about as misleading as the wage gap, because neither indicate discrimination, but rather, they are caused by choice. When both parents try for custody of the child, men get it 55% of the time IIRC. The stat that men get custody rarely is because they rarely try to get it. I'm on mobile so can't provide a source atm.
/r/MensRights08/06/17 12:39 PM
1

Rewrite what she/he said back to her, bit change mras with feminists, misogynists with misandrists, etc. Then point out everything he/she said holds as much water as what you said.
/r/MensRights31/05/17 09:39 AM
3

Errr, INTERNALISED MISOGYNY! PATRIARCHY! LATE STAGE CAPITALISM!
/r/MensRights26/05/17 01:21 PM
154

Id wager its twoxchromosomes
/r/MensRights13/05/17 03:55 PM
17

To prove my point, i shall link you to a completely unbiased and impartial source. This will show that I am clearly correct
/r/MensRights13/05/17 03:54 PM
7

I love the amount of civil discussion in this thread. Its actually amazing, especially when you compare it to say, r/twoxchromosomes
/r/MensRights30/04/17 02:52 AM
139

I dont know who you are... But i will find you... And i will give you a cookie
/r/MensRights27/03/17 01:13 PM
1

If any man lives near by, Please please PLEEEASE do me a favor. Go up and claim to sexually identify as female and get discount. If they refuse, raise a hullabaloo online/with the media. If they do give you discount, laugh about it online and use it as an exanple to how stupid gender expressions and whatnot are.
/r/MensRights25/03/17 03:39 PM
2

Errr, something something toxic masculinity, something something wage gap.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 04:54 PM
1

really? I hadnt noticed. In case you were serious and poes law is fucking me up for the umpteenth time, then i was referring to the fact that i had never heard critics of Islam claiming that Muhammad was a necrophiliac.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 03:42 PM
2

Really? Link please. This is new
/r/MensRights11/03/17 01:42 PM
3

Hang on. I too enjoy bashing shit for the sake of bashing it, but necrophilia is not a crime he was guilty was.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 12:56 PM
10

Muslims believe that the angle Gabriel told Mohammed the quran, piece by piece, and that he memorised it and preached it. Thats why the Koran took 23 years to be complete. All of Mohammed's followers memorised the koran, and then, after the death of Mohammed, Othman was worried that everyone else who had memorised the koran might die as well, so he was the first person to write it down. Also pls tell me what muslims countries ban women from being literate. Not even saudi does this.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 06:39 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter