TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Yuri_TxM Archive

View 1 posts and 165 comments by Yuri_TxM on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Yuri_TxM/r/askTRP22/05/21 05:27 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

What you do before getting the contact has always been and will always be more important than the contact itself. This literally is in the M3 itself. Numbers never were "be all end alls" for anyone that has ever stepped on the field. Like ????? You're trying to argue a truism everybody who's past noob knows.
/r/TheRedPill14/05/24 06:04 AM
15

in my experience the cost is not higher. You still can get numbers from girls you have nice vibes from. But the number means less today than it used to. Less people had access to a given woman's contact info and they were more open to keep it going in that way. Today you're better off actually closing in person instead of asking to see her again through that contact point. You'll just be another one if you get a contact, and you'll have to go through all the trouble of making yourself seen again…
/r/TheRedPill14/05/24 05:54 AM
2

it always has. That's not the point.
/r/TheRedPill14/05/24 05:49 AM
15

With experience and "oldness" it should be easier, not harder - considering stable conditions. It's the climate. In the past women saw men as fun and the opposite sex, a source of interesting experiences and feelings. Today women got so ingrained with progressism they are just afraid. Of everything. So yeah, it's way easier for you to explore other avenues than gaming on night clubs. At least that's my experience. With caution too, women are way more problematic, unpredictable and dangerous than…
/r/TheRedPill14/05/24 05:48 AM
4

Growth doesn't matter for them. Even if they do grow with you they can leave you for another guy ahead of you in the social pyramid if they think they should.
/r/TheRedPill27/11/21 05:27 PM
2

Yes, it's really better to be red pilled. Our forefathers were but we let ourselves be dragged all the way down here. Next question.
/r/TheRedPill25/11/21 09:04 PM
1

Find the book of pook and read it.
/r/askTRP22/11/21 04:37 PM
32

I'd like to add some points 1 - the local rp writer I based my rp journey from use to say that for women sex is always transactional. It seems for them sex is always a sort of a currency. They use it as a means of exchange for what they want. 2 - onlyfans classify girls there as "sex industry employees". And it seems they are legally treated that way as well. At least here where I live both men and women would see that as an euphemism to prostitute. 3 - a "sl_t" I followed for some time (very ho…
/r/TheRedPill21/11/21 11:02 PM
2

Tell her to stop using her phone and pay attention. Otherwise leave her and find a "physical" girlfriend.
/r/askTRP20/06/21 07:06 PM
3

No reason why you would be beta then. If you had fallen in the attention trap or being drooling over them or being excessively jealous... It's actually hard for a rp'd guy to be beta.
/r/askTRP06/06/21 06:48 AM
1

It depends on how your overall attitude was, not on a single thing you did or did not. What did you do while they were trying to get your attention? How did you do it? How did you behave? What were the body postures you assumed? There are some things only you can tell. Or not even you, because some of it happens unconsciously most of the time.
/r/askTRP06/06/21 05:39 AM
1

Coming from a guy who can't read, I'm flattered lmao
/r/askTRP24/05/21 04:37 PM
1

Lmao it's not about liking. I don't think you exist to please me, do you? You're just saying unrelated stuff without knowing. Most stuff you talked about doesn't make sense on the topic.
/r/askTRP24/05/21 02:07 PM
1

This is also unrelated to the topic.
/r/askTRP24/05/21 03:51 AM
1

So it doesn't solve the problem. It's like saying to a blind guy you'll fix his sight problems by giving him a walking cane.
/r/askTRP24/05/21 01:05 AM
1

That's the idea. Going there.
/r/askTRP24/05/21 12:05 AM
1

Not needed. Also I don't know if a prenup can make a judge give you the kids.
/r/askTRP24/05/21 12:04 AM
1

That's not what I asked though lmao
/r/askTRP24/05/21 12:02 AM
1

No problem. But still didn't seem to get what I asked. You're answer a question that wasn't asked. Which is also cool.
/r/askTRP23/05/21 12:41 AM
1

Cool. Do you mind tell me your name, address and social security number as well?
/r/askTRP23/05/21 12:39 AM
1

Would you LTR anyone from a first world country who will use you as betabux? Hahahaha
/r/askTRP23/05/21 12:38 AM
1

Exactly. If it's just for fuck, why would you care. Just do it. Women can gold dig you in a single fuck, unless you're a dumb than dumber motherfucker. The post is not about just for fuck cases.
/r/askTRP22/05/21 11:41 PM
1

Have you read the post? This case doesn't fit the example I gave.
/r/askTRP22/05/21 11:38 PM
1

I don't know about that. Would you consider marrying a guy who have a stable job, a nice car and comfortable house to fuck him, have 2 kids and live him 5 years later without a home, kids and giving almost his full salary to the bitch in alimony as gold digging? I would. And this is not really a rare case. And this is a worry most guys in the community have. This happens like 50% of the time people marry. Maybe you're a new guy. Lurk for 2 years.
/r/askTRP22/05/21 11:36 PM
1

If you're worried about having a bed to die on, I'd say you have very low expectations on life. And I'd like to inform you that life is not digital. It's analogical. You'd almost never have just 2 diametrically opposite options. It's not like you're having to choose between being homeless or a bachelor billionaire. It's not 1 or 0, nothing else.
/r/askTRP22/05/21 08:37 PM
2

The issue here is that women are socially oriented. Women are more or less herd animals, they behave more or less collectively. That's why fashion trends are a thing. They tend to do what other people (especially other women) are doing around them. So it's very very hard to find a girl (even a trad one in a good family) having the ability to reject Marxist/feminist ideas. I've never found one. And I've dealt with thousands in the past 10 years. Even if you find a women that hates feminism, in a …
/r/askTRP22/05/21 07:23 PM
1

Most marriage end up in divorce, not all of them. The deep question behind it is what motivated me to write this post. Thing is, we have to walk a fine line right now. Post modern ideologies have clouded some basic concepts for us. Like, are gender roles wrong? Are men and women the same? What are the proper gender roles? What is a family? How should a family be established? Should I/you have a family? Why? We all know the answers to those questions. They are actually natural and simple. But we …
/r/askTRP22/05/21 07:12 PM
3

Yup. We also got to remember women are extremely social oriented. In small towns, sluts are looked down. People form their families early. In big cities every single friend she has is a slut since she was 14 and will settle at 40 with an impotent 60 yo dude.
/r/TheRedPill21/05/21 06:15 PM
4

Obviously, hypergamy is always present. I guess in small towns social dynamics are different. So you don't have a large pool of people to choose from. So you might give guys around your level more time for them to show their insides for you. Who people are can matter as much as how alpha they are. I'm not sure if you ever lived in small towns, it's pretty clear cut who's who and who can end up with whom. Everyone knows everything about everyone else.
/r/TheRedPill20/05/21 10:40 PM
9

I haven't finished it yet but I have a couples of things to point out: Brazilians have the notion that everything imported is better. Even you. So if you have money enough to travel to 27 countries and is not a native, well... I'd guess you'd be doing good anywhere. You'd do good in Brazil as well. I've come to a research one of these days pointing out that the bigger the city, the more people are inclined to alpha types. So if you look like The Rock and you go to a big city... Ding ding ding
/r/TheRedPill20/05/21 09:43 PM
24

Unless you're traveling to Rio, that's not the reality, actually. BTW it's rare for 8 yos to do that even there, but I don't think the age of the person holding you at gunpoint matter that much anyway.
/r/TheRedPill20/05/21 09:37 PM
1

I'd say it's hard to say from the outside. Fear is something you can't easily tell if you're not involved. You can't tell for sure the frame of said stoic person. Lately when I hear "stoic attitude" I think about the character of Thomas Shelby, and you'd hardly see a violent person escalate the situation against him. The violent person generally see stoicism as a bluff and sometimes it's worthwhile to call it.
/r/TheRedPill13/05/21 11:06 PM
1

BJJ, brother. And guns too. But sometimes you got to maneuver on people and guns can be too dramatic of an option. Have you seen George Floyd's case? BJJ would've been ideal there. And as far as I understood it, nobody here is promoting bar brawls.
/r/TheRedPill13/05/21 06:30 PM
0

I don't think so. It's hard to see a violent person who doesn't know who are violent too just by looking at them. It's instinctive. You don't know the other person. Will you try your luck on someone stoic that's looking at your soul while you make your damnest to scare him? I don't think so. I've seen the opposite. They may escalate it just to check if your frame stays, just like women.
/r/TheRedPill13/05/21 06:27 PM
1

I might be wrong, but if she's exclusive, she's not a plate. There's no such thing as a "stable plate" the way you're describing, AFAIK.
/r/askTRP12/05/21 11:25 PM
21

Are you sure this is a plate? Sounds like someone you're trying to build a relationship with.
/r/askTRP12/05/21 09:11 AM
0

Based on your lack of understanding of the fundamentals I can't say you're old enough to understand mature concepts like the sense of duty. I'm just drawing logical conclusions here based on what you decided to show me here. So if you're not that young, you better think like the mature guy you believe you are. Do I really have to tell you it's men who have a need for variety, not women? Do we need TRP for that? Really?
/r/askTRP05/04/21 11:00 AM
-1

I'm very interested in making my brothers better. I consider everyone interested in understanding these ideas as a brother. I think we need men who understand these things clearly. It doesn't make me feel better or worse, it's not about me. It's a duty. By your attitude I'm guessing you're too young to understand this concept yet.
/r/askTRP05/04/21 08:13 AM
2

You're right but you just repeated what I've written just above. This was not what you said before. You didn't understand what I've said. Read your comment and mine again. Maybe on a second read it'll click for you. Following your own train of thought, how having sex with multiple men is hypergamy? That's what you said. "Variety is food for her hypergamy". No it's not.
/r/askTRP05/04/21 07:08 AM
-3

Nope. That's not how reality works, sorry. You're making several mistakes here. And that's impressive on 2 phrases of text. 1 - you're confusing hypergamy and polygamy. Women are hardly ever polygamic. The regular girl can't be. 2 - options for women aren't options for men. For women, options means spares/satellites. For men options means plates. They do keep options. They are not fucking them. 3 - she is with her best option already. Right now. Every woman is. As a rule. Now, she can be testing…
/r/askTRP05/04/21 05:10 AM
2

They all do. But they're less and less available in this post modern world.
/r/askTRP05/04/21 05:01 AM
-1

I don't think we're here to discuss the morality of a husband cheating on his wife, are we? Last time I checked that was not the focus of the sub. Nor of this post. Nor of my comment.
/r/askTRP05/04/21 05:00 AM
1

Apparently we're using the word cheat in different definitions. I'm using it in the context of polygamy. If you're married or single or whatever, it doesn't change the polygamy aspect of it. I couldn't care less about other people's relationship agreements.
/r/askTRP05/04/21 04:58 AM
1

Yes. Hypergamy. Then don't need a why. They just need a guy better than you willing to fuck her.
/r/askTRP05/04/21 04:55 AM
1

Would you let her be touchy with your best friend?
/r/askTRP05/04/21 04:54 AM
2

Vanity and dealing with her ever-present depression.
/r/askTRP05/04/21 01:06 AM
2

In women's eyes sex is always transactional. So.
/r/askTRP05/04/21 01:03 AM
0

It depends. Some individuals are nuanced but they also vary in a very specific way that's also fairly predictable. It's mostly black and white, yes. If it wasn't TRP wouldn't work. I've never seen a case were awalt didn't apply. Maybe I was just lucky in always dealing with the "most" individuals.
/r/askTRP05/04/21 01:00 AM
4

You probably done something wrong. Most guys have a lot of girls and they are okay with it. They even find it exciting. Maybe you behaved like you were doing something wrong or was ashamed of it. I'm some guys they even expect to be cheated. It's all about frame.
/r/askTRP05/04/21 12:55 AM
2

Yes, but no. Dealing with women is dealing with paradoxes all the time. Sex is everything? Yes. Sex is the beginning, the end and the middle of your dealings with her. They see themselves as a body. Actually, they don't see themselves, they feel themselves as a body. They are way more instinctive then most of us are. In their minds, the only reason that justify you being with them is sex. They express themselves romantically through sex. That's why they like the jerk so much. But is sex everythi…
/r/askTRP05/04/21 12:53 AM
9

Thing is, those psychologists are orienting their academic focus on post-modern lenses. I can argue there's no "sociosexual orientation". This theory does not account for a couple of things: orgasm increase wowen fertility and they are more likely to have an orgasm with a lover than with a long term partner. Paradoxically, women also tend to orgasm more often with long term partners then with one night stands. And women tend to stay more attached to men that gives them orgasms (more generally, s…
/r/askTRP05/04/21 12:45 AM
2

I'm sorry but I never saw women have a need for variety. I've seen they having a need for "alphaness", not variety. They are not wired that way.
/r/askTRP05/04/21 12:38 AM
2

if you're not going to pursue her, don't validate her. Yes. But it's not clear if he's going to pursue them or not. Maybe he will. Maybe he won't. I gave my advice on a reply to him saying 🆘 somewhere around here. To me it's more about his mentality on the situation than he looking or not. You saying "your gaze is always validation" is true but it isn't. It's not practical. What, he'll pop his eyes off so he can stop looking at ass and tits? There are girls that take the slightest look past them…
/r/askTRP01/04/21 07:44 PM
3

Yes, but this is not the issue here.
/r/askTRP01/04/21 07:32 PM
1

I mostly deal with dudes on my day to day, so nofap just makes me more "monkey brain" when I see ass. I'm not saying nofap isn't helpful, BTW. It really is. But not in that area. At least for me.
/r/askTRP01/04/21 04:27 AM
7

Read the book of pook, specially 15 rules and the secret of the jerk. He even uses the same words you did. And, there's no amount of pussy you can have that'll make you not attracted to it anymore. It's an instinct. It's like saying you'll eat so much you'll never have to eat again. It doesn't work like that.
/r/askTRP01/04/21 04:24 AM
1

Why though? Make it part of your frame. She's hot. She should be. Deal with it.
/r/askTRP01/04/21 04:22 AM
6

Kinda yes but no. It depends. Are you acting like she's a girl you'll never have or just another hot girl? Why should the girl be attracted to a guy that doesn't find her attractive? It's not like this, really. You ignore her, she'll ignore you. Unless she's never being ignored before. This specific girl will chase you out of ego/pride or won't? It depends. How long will you avoid her? You can't make generalizations on your point, so.
/r/askTRP01/04/21 04:21 AM
40

Have you ever read "be relentless" by David x? Or the 15 rules in the book of pook? Or the secret of the jerk, also by pook? OK, the girl is hot. So what? It's not like she doesn't know. It's not like she's not expecting you to be attracted. She knows you're a guy, she's a sexual creature. Think about ass. Look at their tits. There's nothing wrong with it. Own the monkey brain. Just don't simp or assault her. Act like the grown up you are. You'd love to have sex with this fine lady right here. B…
/r/askTRP01/04/21 04:17 AM
1

Women like to procreate with the most socially relevant animal of her species.
/r/askTRP26/02/21 01:14 PM
-1

Yes but no. It's good but if you have none of it you can still get pussy. Look for Style, the dude.
/r/askTRP26/02/21 01:13 PM
5

Does it matter? Yes. Does it not matter? Yes. Women will be with you because of looks, because of money, because of attitude, because of nothing at all. Women don't make logical sense.
/r/askTRP26/02/21 01:11 PM
2

Looks matter. Being in shape matter. Have what you could call "jerk aura" matter even more. Style is ugly as a motherfucker, Bald, skinny and short. Still scored models.
/r/askTRP26/02/21 01:08 PM
6

Either way she would be his ex, brother.
/r/askTRP08/01/21 01:05 PM
6

It's kinda about being slutty, but it's more about getting caught. Women have the NEED to be manipulative and they fear getting caught. Imagine if the guy uncovers your plan of making him raise another guy's kid? Boy oh boy
/r/askTRP08/01/21 01:01 PM
2

Well, if it's just a physiological need, have a hooker. Feels like you wanna hear sth you didn't tell us. What do you wanna hear? I dunno. How in the world are you supposed to pick up chicks while feeling like this? Women can smell feelings. They will look at you as a pathetic little bum as you cry on their shoulder calling daddy. They'll either take advantage of your weak moment (it's natural to be weak in this situation) and pick you apart, or you'll find a girl in worse emotional shape than y…
/r/askTRP28/12/20 11:39 AM
4

Not really, man. There's not much to do, really. There's some brain chemistry that gets you there for a while. It'll go away but for now you'll mourn. That's how stuff works. Everything moves. Everything wanes. Everything fades. This is an old, almost universal truth. What you're feeling is just a feeling and as such, it'll fade away eventually. Just don't let yourself be dragged into it, don't go to a doctor so he can give you meds (it'll get you awfully addicted, even the "harmless" ones). Do …
/r/askTRP28/12/20 11:32 AM
1

you're wrong because I say so and I never make a mistake, ever! and I'm not engaging further And I appreciate it.
/r/askTRP27/12/20 09:53 AM
0

how do you suggest Oh, so on one comment you ask me if I'm doing what I'm suggesting and on the next one you ask what I suggested? Hmkay Your next point is already answered to exhaustion. that's my point Let me just check sth really quick: are you trying to discuss the subject or are you trying to win? Let me do some of the thinking for ya, to leave it as a template (according to J. Peterson, some people don't know how to think. Maybe that's your case): yes, it can be your point, but if it was y…
/r/TheRedPill26/12/20 02:54 PM
0

Sounds like you replied to the wrong comment. I was not passive aggressive at all, the only mention I did to you specifically was to say you are maybe young and that can explain why you can't see yourself in the perspective I described (and that's why I described it). I never mentioned your intelligence. how will non-beta men like to change current rules? Well, 1 - I meant alpha, not non-beta. You can be worse than beta 2 - Is duty a choice? Depending on your perspective on it I can give you a d…
/r/TheRedPill25/12/20 08:53 PM
0

You don't seem to understand my point, actually. Maybe you're too young and you still see yourself stuck in a set of rules you were born into and you have no control over whatsoever. Society is nothing more than a group of people who have agreed certain rules are right and we should follow them. Thing is, women are the followers and men are the leaders (betaish males if not expressing their will on the rules are at least agreeing with the rules proposed). Society is always established and led by…
/r/TheRedPill25/12/20 10:43 AM
0

You're doing some heavy straw man to consciously avoid understanding what I said. And you're doing it so grossly you had to correct yourself first. Damn. I'm not saying you'll have a girl blow you in front of her friends. Because that's not the moment when you talk about this sort of stuff (I don't know if you ever got to this point). There are some things you talk about in a intimate moment, why the hell you'll talk about her cumming in front of her friends? Why the hell her friends would make …
/r/askTRP24/12/20 04:15 PM
0

Oh there is lmao. Sex is not strictly about anatomy because psychology. People use to condense this in the saying "the main sexual organ in the human body is the brain". Guys convice girls that getting hit and pissed will give them pleasure, why it's impossible to make them cum by giving head? Makes no sense. You probably haven't noticed how your own sexuality works and how people (specially females in a sexual context) respond to suggestion. And the obvious fact that female orgasm is different …
/r/askTRP24/12/20 08:34 AM
3

Shocked replies here had me grinning. Yeah man, people eat with their mouths and sometimes it comes back if you poke the back of your mouth, who knew? Hahahaha It happens, fellows. I've slipped in a girl juices during sex one time and fell flat on my ass. When shit like that happens you get some stories to tell, at least. Stop being so sensitive about it. Not a big deal. OP, lots of good advice here as usual. I have nothing to add on that side of the story.
/r/askTRP23/12/20 02:12 PM
6

It was the opposite with me, she gave me lots of bjs before pussy.
/r/askTRP23/12/20 02:06 PM
5

I guess you should do sth about it, brother. Maybe they're too tight up to know that it's pleasureful for them. Have you ever told any of them that some chicks come without touching themselves just by sucking dick? Create a fantasy in their minds. They love when you do it. Tell one of them you never came to a bj before. Tell us what happened next hahahah
/r/askTRP23/12/20 02:05 PM
6

Take what you can out of it. I take "bitches will do pretty much anything you tell them to".
/r/askTRP23/12/20 02:01 PM
2

Rule of thumb: if you aren't going for her, don't check her out. Simple. If she's good enough, go for it.
/r/askTRP18/12/20 03:38 AM
1

If she gets tired and leave, you'll be pounding 3 other girls to the side. Who cares?
/r/askTRP18/12/20 03:34 AM
1

Well, I just have some bullet points to add, really. don't EVER say anything to a woman you can't or aren't willing to see through. If you said you are dumping her, dump her. If you say you are going to be seeing other women, see other women. If you say you are going to hit her if she doesn't comply... Just don't say it cause she'll put you to the test and you'll break. Now, of course sometimes you say stuff without meaning it (like you probably did with the "I'm leaving you"), but make your wor…
/r/askTRP18/12/20 03:28 AM
3

Made me chuckle.
/r/askTRP18/12/20 03:16 AM
3

Women as fascinated by status as we are by good physical attributes hahaha
/r/askTRP18/12/20 03:12 AM
2

This showcases how women are mostly a product of their societal environment, with their touch of personality.
/r/askTRP18/12/20 03:11 AM
5

Around here 9s are already giving rusty trombones for a $20. 11s are doing it for $50 though.
/r/TheRedPill17/12/20 03:52 PM
3

RP is like lifting for social/women skills.
/r/TheRedPill17/12/20 03:50 PM
4

If your end state is sex, you can get there in a week. Then what? Is it all RP is about? I don't think so. We can make a lot out of it.
/r/TheRedPill17/12/20 03:49 PM
8

OP is touching a dubious point in RP doctrine. If society failed or ever comes to the point of failure, it is men's fault because men are the ones who say and drive where society is going. This is a RP point, a civilizatory one. But getting lots of pussy and understanding how humans work at the sexual instinct level is also a RP point, so we're here where both ends meet. I'm particularly more on the civilized side. I'm not really into living in caves and eating raw food with my bare hands in eve…
/r/TheRedPill17/12/20 03:32 PM
2

Nobody here is saying, much less crying, it's impossible to get laid. You're the one flipping and calling names like a kid who's been denied a candy because you can't argue back or even read. If it's not being triggered... Lmao Throwing a hissy fit at me because you can't deal with your own pride will only make me laugh harder. Keep going.
/r/askTRP17/12/20 02:53 PM
1

she's using her emotions to gain a power foothold Some other dude here argues that she's being sincere. Well, she can. But is she? I doubt it. They tend to use their emotions as a power lever way more often than they are sincere about it, so I'm cautious to say the least. Only OP can grade it with some level of confidence. she's likely to orbit forever That's my point. If that's what he wants and if he can hold his emotions forever, she'll probably stay there glady forever. And I mean gladly. Th…
/r/askTRP17/12/20 02:50 PM
1

I never said he's manipulating her I know, dude. I didn't say you did, but OP was vague and we're conjecturing about it. OP has a conscience, that's why he's feeling guilty Yes, but no. He does seem to be conscious about it. But he shouldn't be. Idk how you understand guilt, but guilt is a social mechanism that works to prevent you from doing wrong stuff. It's very important to have it. But in this case he's doing absolutely nothing wrong. On the contrary. This situation only happens when you do…
/r/askTRP17/12/20 02:41 PM
1

But I guess she knows it. Although women like to fool themselves, by OP's description, it's kinda obvious. So he still does not have reason to feel guilty. He should feel guilty because she's deluding herself? you have only these to choices when women fall for you Idk man. Depends on what you want to do. What's the end state? He wants a LTR, he wants to enjoy the single life, he wants to get rid of her because he's not ready to deal with it yet...? Maybe you want to keep them like that, and mayb…
/r/askTRP17/12/20 02:25 PM
3

He's going to hurt her if he breaks frame and fall for her. It'll make them both unhappy. You're getting it backwards.
/r/askTRP17/12/20 01:36 AM
15

I don't see stuff like this because I don't see myself manipulating them. He's doing what he have to be doing, she's doing what is expected of her. If she checks a lot of boxes, be exclusive. If you like stuff like it is, keep doing you. If you don't want the temptation of emotional involvement because you can't control your emotions, leave her. There's no reason for guilt here. He should be guilty of doing stuff right? He should be softer to feel better? He should let himself fall from her? I d…
/r/askTRP17/12/20 01:35 AM
1

I'm not man, it just seems you didn't get what I'm saying. Why the hell you imply so many feelings into what people type? Hahahaha I'm also answering when I can. Sorry but I have a life and I'm scrolling my cellphone all day.
/r/askTRP17/12/20 01:25 AM
2

Why should he? The guy would be gone by June.
/r/askTRP17/12/20 01:22 AM
2

You can either a) keep what you are doing (ignoring him) while watching your 6. This can get him mad and keep trying to screw you up increasingly once petty things don't have the desired effect, or b) you can confront him, demanding respect, talking and acting like what he's doing is completely unacceptable and that he should be ashamed of acting like this. He also can be explode after that and attack you with everything he can think of. If B is what he's looking for, A can work better. Maybe he…
/r/askTRP17/12/20 01:22 AM
4

She does want to have a bear. So you're stuck with her and not interesting to anybody else.
/r/askTRP17/12/20 01:00 AM
1

Yes. But it depends on what he wants from her.
/r/askTRP17/12/20 12:54 AM
6

Everyone catch feelings fast, feelings are just a instinctive response to stuff that happens. It's the animal way to understand the world. They are volatile by "design". An animal can't be afraid for a week, it wouldn't work. You can't feel happy or sad or angry for a lot of time, if you do you have problems.
/r/askTRP17/12/20 12:52 AM
3

That's women strategy and outlook on life. Interesting. Do you really need to behave like a baby your whole life?
/r/askTRP17/12/20 12:48 AM
1

I guess he was being dubious on purpose. He's intentions are not dubious, he seems to be consciously giving her ambiguous to keep her on her heels (as he should). He's being clear to himself, not to her. And he's acting with clear intentions also.
/r/askTRP17/12/20 12:47 AM
3

Check the book of pook for reference. It's not about manipulation.
/r/askTRP17/12/20 12:45 AM
4

just for it all to end in a fiery blaze. AHAHAHAHAHAHA love always end in tragedy right?
/r/askTRP17/12/20 12:43 AM
4

Why he should be guilty? I don't think he should, really. Edit: Having sex is not wrong. Seducting and being attractive to a young lady is not evil. If he's good enough to keep her coming back instead of going for others, if he's interesting enough to make her fall for him, why should he be guilty? Why would he be a sociopath if he didn't feel guilty? Guilty of what?
/r/askTRP17/12/20 12:41 AM
1

Well, it's part of the "training" to have an iron claw over your emotions. And you are right where it starts to get fun. Of course, unless you still don't like to feel discomfort (and I suggest you to change that by doing difficult things). Women are all about feelings. We aren't. Love is a feeling that is allowed only for them. Care for her, like her, help her but do not love her. It'll make you lose her respect and stop loving you. If that's what you're interested on. If it's not, dump the pla…
/r/askTRP17/12/20 12:40 AM
1

They only see us as function, not as people.
/r/askTRP17/12/20 12:26 AM
0

Jesus hahaha that's not what I wrote and I had no gloomy or pessimistic intention. It's not what I meant and it's not what I wrote, so it's not my fault. I'm terribly sorry but I can't really sit in front of you and read what I've written so you can have intonation. Only you can deal with your projections, pal. I'll write it again, so you can have another chance to read what it's written (you could just go back and read again, but no. Everything that goes wrong is their fault, the infamous them)…
/r/askTRP17/12/20 12:11 AM
1

What you said proves my point. Keep reading what I've wrote down here at other comments. Yes, 1.76 is 6"ish, exactly what I said. 1.68 can be tall enough for some girls, in certain shoes you're 1.70, which is kinda average in a lot of countries. Our guy here is 5"6', which is 1.64. At 1.64 he would be look down at the majority of men at the majority of Western countries (which seems to we where he's from), and that's never good while dealing with women. EXCEPT in the cases I've mentioned. Which …
/r/askTRP16/12/20 11:47 PM
1

Ooh, somebody got triggered AHAHAHAHAHAHA relax, my child. Apparently you got some projection going there. Nice. Learn to be wrong, everybody is wrong sometimes. It's not really that hard to swallow your useless pride. Grow up and be a better man. You're already at the right place, which is good. I really doubt you would say that to my face though. Best regards, pal. Take care.
/r/askTRP16/12/20 08:06 PM
1

red pill teaches us not to be concerned Yes. But the guy is. This is a thing that makes him uncomfortable. So I contributed my 2c to the thing, that's all. And this is a point where I think he can work on and get better.
/r/askTRP16/12/20 08:03 PM
0

this is a terrible way to approach this. Is it though? Is it? An app that has the purpose to get people laid is really a terrible way to measure people's preferences for getting laid? Really? I'm not sure, pal. I know tall guys that get none and small guys that get lots Good! What do these small guys that get lots have that you don't? It's because they're fitter than you are? How can you emulate them? Where do you need to improve based on their behaviors? Style is a little guy, I don't remember …
/r/askTRP16/12/20 07:49 AM
2

You can disagree all day long, man. I have also seen 5" girls with guys taller than them by an inch. I'm 5"10 and I've dated a 5"9' girl for a while. I'm not saying it won't work. I'm not saying you should become a couch potato or kill yourself because you're too small to get laid. That's not what I'm saying. What I'm saying is that girls like tall man. I'm not saying 7"5', but taller than them, around 6" ish. Although I have also seen 5" girls with 5"4' guys, I've also seen 5" girls with 6"4' g…
/r/askTRP16/12/20 07:36 AM
3

That's exactly my point. If he keeps doing what he's doing in the gym, he'll be fine. But he's 5"6'. If a girl can have a 240 lbs 6 footer, do you think she'll go for it or for the 5"6' 150? The answer is pretty obvious. But if you read what the guy wrote, he does not described himself as acting alpha. He does not sound like a guy who has confidence in picking up whatever girl he puts his eyes on. But he's saying he's fit. So, what do you think he must focus on? He's fit. He's not that confident…
/r/askTRP16/12/20 07:20 AM
0

I'm sorry, I commented this on a bodybuilding subreddit? I thought I was commenting on trp. Oh wait, I am on trp. Huh. We're not talking about bodybuilding, sweetie. We're talking about how much being fit can make you more attractive to women, and this has nothing to do at all with limiting yourself. Even if I was talking about bodybuilding, how in the fucking hell "focusing on other stuff while being fit" is limiting? God hahahaha can you even read, really? Come on bro. Help yourself out. Give …
/r/askTRP16/12/20 07:12 AM
3

Uhm... It is that self evident. Those "some people" are putting moral principles on top of their self preservation instinct. That's kind of unusual and hard to do. You see a lot more murderers and robbers than people doing heroic and selfless stuff, don't you? It's evolutionary easier to murder and maim than to commit suicide. I'm sure you probably have noticed your mom fits AWALT in other situations, but you just got a bad example.
/r/askTRP16/12/20 03:39 AM
6

Another thing you have to realize is that maybe you're only acting the right way with fat chicks. Maybe if you treat hot chicks that way you'll get something too. Women are all women. And they are all reactive. If you think being strong and lean will get women throwing themselves at you in the street, think again. What it'll give you is better, more open responses to your advances, and free IOIs. You'll start to see hotter women notice you more. Then they were in the "non-responsive" pool, now t…
/r/askTRP16/12/20 03:30 AM
14

That too surprised me: your mom sees you just as a man and behaves just as a woman, not as a mom.
/r/askTRP16/12/20 03:22 AM
-5

Nah. Physical appearance have some limitations. If you're 5"6', you're pretty much screwed at that side of the pic. The only short guys I know can hit amazing chicks are high status ones: rich, famous or at least with that jerky attitude and reactions that make them think "this guy knows what he's doing with women". If you're 5"6' and a 6 ft guy comes around EXACTLY like you (or even slightly worse than you), they'll have the taller guy regardless. Height is hard wired in them for a few reasons.…
/r/askTRP16/12/20 03:06 AM
12

These scars are the ones that will make the knowledge stuck. Even though I didn't have this dramatic experience my moment was very traumatic for me as well. It's that moment when everything you think you know about life doesn't match with reality, and everything rp tells you happens exactly like it should. That relief of the absolute confusion you're in.
/r/askTRP16/12/20 02:58 AM
11

The thing that amazed me the most when I first got the notions and was matching them to reality to see if they fit (I do this with everything new and boy, these ideas do fit perfectly) was the realization that every single thought a woman thinks about all the time concernes sex or at least her body. All the time. They can't turn it off. Their ENTIRE lives orbit around their pussies. Through this point of view you realize perfectly why they are so terrified about going old, among other things. An…
/r/askTRP16/12/20 02:51 AM
2

The question is not if you should leave her, is why you let it get to this point. You should've kicked her months, maybe years ago.
/r/askTRP29/11/20 08:11 AM
5

Then that's your problem, not porn or the lack of it.
/r/askTRP22/11/20 04:40 PM
1

yes, I treated you EXACTLY how I expect to be treated if I act like an idiot without self awareness. still on self awareness, that what you should be focusing instead of trying to censor what people say here. And I feel completely free to show you why you shouldn't. If you feel you're in a racist place where your race is misrepresented and oppressed, just leave. Find a place where you don't feel discriminated against. Nobody will be missing you, I guarantee it. Better yet, open a subreddit to ta…
/r/askTRP27/10/20 04:35 AM
1

You're the one stating you're black, complaining about the opinion of a black man, trying to censor where the guy posts his opinions and impressions, using ghetto slang trying to look cool and threatening, complaining about racism, complaining you're in a "white men's group"... Not me. Nobody asked you your race, you're the one talking about it. You don't have a clue what "responsibility" is, do ya? Lmao if you don't wanna deal with something, don't bring it on yourself and act as a victim.
/r/askTRP27/10/20 04:07 AM
1

Ooh, it's the gangsta ghetto internet thug using that ghetto poser slang to feel better about himself. Beware folks! He's dAnGeRoUs Stop being pathetic dude. Seriously. Talking like that you probably can't even get out of your house with your back straight. You're scaring a grand total of 0 people.
/r/askTRP26/10/20 06:10 AM
4

Ok, let me quote you a little bit, maybe you don't even remember what you said (considering what you're saying, it's probable you're really that dumb). "don't push stereotypes against you or people that look like you" "you're misrepresenting our people in a forum of white men" "as black men is our responsibility to protect our community" "be aware of your conditioning" "no one said anything about racism or oppression" "you don't have much reading comprehension" Well, nice projection. I'll give y…
/r/askTRP26/10/20 06:00 AM
5

Not everything is about racism and oppression narratives. Get your head out of your ass first, maybe then you'll see it a little bit clearer. The only person that seems to care if you're white, black, blue or striped is you. This is not what this subreddit is about.
/r/askTRP26/10/20 02:59 AM
2

Then we know who's wrong
/r/askTRP26/10/20 02:51 AM
3

Ooh, his a philosopher hahahaha No you're not. Philosophers by definition think before opening their mouth. What you said sums up to "it's not men's fault. But it is. But maybe it isn't. But it could have been. If it wasn't, it wouldn't be." So, no. You wrote far too much and said far too little. Your ideas are too incomplete. You're not as special as you think. It is men's fault because we set the course for society, all the time, forever. If it's set in a bad direction it is our fault and we'r…
/r/askTRP26/10/20 02:51 AM
6

I also believe that's where she got messed up. At the same time she was rich, she knew she was not.
/r/TheRedPill30/01/18 04:40 PM
1

We're not blaming anyone, we're looking for possible reasons. It is a lot of work and takes time and resources, but that's why we're here. You have to fight yourself every day, to convince you're instinctive brain that is smarter not to have kids, and I guess we all know who end up winning this battle. The guy above gave a good argument about smarter women being less rational in having kids (as contradictory as it could, but that's how they are in the first place anyway). Perhaps that's research…
/r/TheRedPill30/01/18 04:13 PM
2

And women love to use it against us. They feel very comfortable with uncertainty.
/r/TheRedPill29/01/18 08:46 PM
6

He'll catch himself thinking "why the hell this girl went out with me and then groped another dude? It doesn't make any sense!" Well... Until you know what's going on, it really don't.
/r/TheRedPill29/01/18 06:02 PM
2

The funny thing is that together with the whole feminist ideology post wall, we increased the use of plastics, that leak phthalates and BPA on food, which are strogen mimicking substances. It's not just ideological, it's making women synthetically more aggressive, making girl mature younger, and feminized men. If you get the notion that plastics started to popularize around the 50s, the 80s are the first "estrogen drugged" generation, and there we go. If you look at the old wise texts of any rel…
/r/TheRedPill29/01/18 04:39 PM
15

I guess all of us have been in the same place, and I remember it's really hard to understand what's wrong, because for you, you're just doing everything right but they react "unexpectedly", and you assume that's how they are. Sad for the guy.
/r/TheRedPill29/01/18 12:02 PM
2

Not really. They take pills thinking about this month, and fuck does not necessarily mean to have kids, women tend to want to fuck whenever you want (if you do it properly). It's not about mood, it's they can't plan long term because they can't see it, that's what we are discussing here. Maybe that's how they are. It's possible.
/r/TheRedPill29/01/18 11:40 AM
10

Well... You may be saying this from 2 points of view: A) you're a dude. And you're a rookie around here. As such, I recommend you the extensive reading of trp material, there's around somewhere, I have it here but I don't remember exactly the post where I get it. And you're probably inexperienced too, or you would've already seen a girl change her mind 148 times in a blink of the eye, right there in front of you, leaving you pretty amazed. Then I must tell you that these same girls are the ladie…
/r/TheRedPill29/01/18 02:40 AM
1

Funny thing is that you went to the hypothesis that they have a thought process. I've abandoned this idea long ago. To me, feelings are the sophisticated response to instinct, and the complete opposite of what a thought is. But it makes sense the way you put it.
/r/TheRedPill29/01/18 01:33 AM
10

I strongly agree with that. Really makes sense. Another thing that I realized this week is that everything in a woman points and aims to be a mother. They live to be mothers, and they can't be more satisfied when they have a kid. All the other stuff are up to us, and they can't plan not organize anything aside the "cave" we've been living in since prehistoric times. Probably there's a link between be a mother and cook the game meat with being sequential.
/r/TheRedPill28/01/18 10:03 PM
4

"you'll have weak moments and it's OK to have them." no, it's not. And if you keep indulging it, you'll never get past it. It's not just understanding the material, it's putting the knowledge to work, bro. Get yourself together and value yourself more than you value her. Only like this you'll really learn and understand what you've read. Like David X says, be a man. If you don't have balls, what you have left is a pussy. Hope it helps.
/r/TheRedPill28/01/18 06:59 PM
4

Counterintuitive? Not really. The first thing we must know is that women are fundamentally different than men. They think and want things completely different from us. It's not counterintuitive: they want the strongest mate in the group, and their whole reality is based on feelings. They are always trying to bend us with feelings, to tame us. If you're a psychopath, a guy who never showed any mercy towards women, if you "used to be" dangerous to the point of killing the girls you "slept" with, a…
/r/TheRedPill20/01/18 08:29 PM
1

I've heard that rapists/serial killer who rape their victims/sexual offenders are the guys who receive a lot of women's attention, even in the jail. Here in Brazil, a guy that received 200+ years sentence for his crimes end up marrying in the jail.
/r/TheRedPill20/01/18 07:30 PM
1

Yes, but TRP doesn't do it. I really can't understand you people, when the whole extent of the books that base every single thought in TRP are about having healthy and productive relationships with women, to make them interested, to make them feel attractive, to express love and respect women, and to make you have orgasms. If that's misogyny to you, I'm sorry for you. If I was a misogynistic, I was using my time hating women, not trying to understand them, learn how to be a better guy and to mak…
/r/ExRedPill29/09/17 12:27 PM
0

And I assume that MRP teaches this as TRP teaches that women are objects and emotionally dishonest, is that right to you? Let's say that based on the fact that I know TRP and I'm seeing for 2 days the kind of judgement and bias you people have around here, and the kind of attitude you expressed above, I don't exactly believe what you said. And fortunately enough, that's the attitude a red piller would expect from you, and I think this does not help the point you're trying to make.
/r/ExRedPill21/09/17 09:48 PM
0

Actually, men are also considered property these days. I see that you're actually really slow, aside from your attempt of being sarcastic.
/r/ExRedPill21/09/17 09:37 PM
1

Thanks for your availability.
/r/ExRedPill21/09/17 09:27 PM
1

And that's exactly why I wrote that, apparently, TRP are making people being honest. I guess I'm not the one twisted things here. And if she's already did, then the whole post is superfluous now, isn't it?
/r/ExRedPill21/09/17 09:13 PM
1

Mode one is a book, actually, not a person. Apparently you did a very nice research. And I would classify it as seduction material at all. It's all about what we're discussing here: changing your attitude and mentality towards life.
/r/ExRedPill21/09/17 09:03 PM
1

It sure isn't, apparently you don't know what kind of material you're referring to. But thanks for the link.
/r/ExRedPill21/09/17 10:30 AM
1

They are, actually. Along with mode one and bad boy, that I've cited somewhere in the replies here. PUA literature. And doing wonders for a lot of guys, and to a lot of girls as a consequence. I honestly don't never digged into the depths of TRP, looking for the jerks and assholes. But it is. Any guy who has a little bit of morals can see that it's never intented to dehumanize nor humiliate nor destroy anything. At all. The material even states it explicitly, by different authors in different co…
/r/ExRedPill21/09/17 10:01 AM
1

Actually, we're not. The point of the thread is "giving it back" to guy, in revenge. We're discussing if it's worthwhile. No matter how much they might be honest after that point, that is not a choice, that is coercion. And no amount of "I have been hurt in the past" can ever justify hurting other in the future. And right there you have one of the best arguments against feminism. Curious, huh?
/r/ExRedPill21/09/17 06:51 AM
0

Finally some sane person! It's not evil and it's not intended to harm anyone. The guys who are doing it wrong are doing it wrong on their own responsibility. How can that be hard to follow is a mystery to me that I'm yet to understand. The thing is, most of the material says that you GOT TO have intimacy. YOU GOT TO BE emotionally involved. It's a must. There's no purpose in doing all this without intimacy. Most of the material is on building better men, to trim the bunch of indifferentiated los…
/r/ExRedPill21/09/17 06:31 AM
-1

You know very well that an anti men's cult is around for a lot longer, don't you?! ;)
/r/ExRedPill21/09/17 06:21 AM
1

And that's your argument against it? If it's so illogical, I bet you can make it in pieces easily, right? You're not throwing a fallacy at me, are you? I hope you're not. It wouldn't work to your favor.
/r/ExRedPill21/09/17 06:11 AM
1

I feel that you're still resented of it. The thing is, for your amusement, this really works. It may not work for everyone, because maybe not everyone can deal with it or need it. Just like a pill (pardon my pun) who made people who don't need it sick. As I've said, he's a dick. How on earth these guys are using this on already stable and long term relationships?? It's not the thing, the problem is himself. Take him to a counselor, if you can. I guess that would make him a little good, at least.…
/r/ExRedPill21/09/17 06:01 AM
1

I actually am in my mid 20s, and I believe in the same thing. The lack of purpose is really troubling. These days everything is enough to raise a passionate argument.
/r/ExRedPill21/09/17 04:24 AM
2

True. Every story has multiple sides. But I think that we can only have a complete picture of the situation if we have the opportunity to see the both sides. That's what I'm trying to do here. Nowadays seems that people are lazy about think the questions over, and just go with whatever people push to their throats.
/r/ExRedPill21/09/17 03:28 AM
0

Of course been sincere is not the only choice. You can have no morals whatsoever. It's on you. OK, let me think if I get your point: you're telling me that you want to, for example, cheat your partner and have no consequences at all? No trace of something people call "responsibility"? In name of freedom and privacy? Really? Well, if something don't justify the other, then feminism is all unjustified, because it is on expense of men's rights and often feminists claim "reparatory actions" or whate…
/r/ExRedPill20/09/17 02:46 PM
-2

The thing is you never heard men experiences, because we don't let these things leak. We don't complain. It's sissiness. But happens, more often than you think, that the guy does the first move and is betrayed over and over again. Some women entice men feelings just to play with them, and I've seen some say this proudly. I really don't understand why women do this, as much as you do not understand why men do this. What I'm telling you is that all of this arouse as a reaction. All of this started…
/r/ExRedPill20/09/17 02:29 PM
0

I apologize for my choice of words, I'm not a native English speaker. It would be more in the sense of leaving the women involved with no other choice then be sincere, not obligated to be sincere or nothing like that. You and half the planet are still pretty free to do whatever you want, even lying and deceiving your partners. Wait, there are Muslim women... They aren't really that free, let's just say a third of the planet, is that OK? A third of the planet can sneak stuff of their partners. Ya…
/r/ExRedPill20/09/17 01:10 PM
1

It's already posted :)
/r/ExRedPill20/09/17 12:50 PM
-1

Now I'm the one who is very confused about how you think it was implied and how you cannot understand what I mean. It's not implied, you openly said that dishonesty and sneakness would validate what TRP says. And you have openly recommended the girl that the best way to deal with the situation is to be open, honest and sincere. In case of further confusion, I suggest you to go back and read once more what you've written, I think it might help you.
/r/ExRedPill20/09/17 12:35 PM
1

I was writing a long response to this, but I'll make a post instead. It's worth it.
/r/ExRedPill20/09/17 11:24 AM
-4

So you mean that TRP make women be honest and sincere with their partners? If the guy is "clear headed" enough and didn't get drunk on TRP over the top stuff, you mean it can be good? Just checking.
/r/ExRedPill20/09/17 09:43 AM
4

I'm looking for a book that's impossible to me to get so far. May I ask here if someone has it?
/r/askTRP20/09/17 08:42 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter