TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ZXD319 Archive

View 0 posts and 29 comments by ZXD319 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

"Separate but equal" is back.
/r/MensRights10/03/26 07:02 AM
35

It really is that bad. And I know this firsthand, because my friends and I have all dated men who’ve reflected these views back at us. There was the guy who, after three months, explained he wasn’t ready for a relationship, a week after trying to book a Christmas holiday together. There was one who, four months in, told me I was too demanding of him, an accusation spurred on by my attempt at booking a restaurant for us after his work drinks. A lot of women have a hard time grasping the concept o…
/r/MensRights05/12/25 04:30 PM
13

The issue is that women get lesser, more lenient sentences across the board for the exact same crimes. That's why you have guys pointing out every example. It's a clear and obvious injustice that isn't being addressed, and isn't even viewed as a problem to most people. There's a very clear two-track system in place that's far more egregious than anything pertaining to race, and yet only the latter gets talked about.
/r/MensRights22/07/25 10:43 AM
11

Do you think those cases are exceptions, or the rule? Is that a consistent outcome? Do you think women are treated the same as men by the justice system, more harshly, or less harshly?
/r/MensRights22/07/25 09:37 AM
23

Just a reminder that its never about what's best for the child; only what's best for her. The child is merely the shield used to justify doing what she demands.
/r/MensRights25/06/25 10:40 AM
2

They said they didn't need men. Turns out they did.
/r/MensRights08/11/24 04:11 PM
1

You don't think being physically weaker in just about every way imaginable plays into their fear of men and the world, in general? That's a little weird. That said, none of what you described addresses what we're actually talking about, however, which is the act of being afraid, and whether or not that prevents you from taking an action. There is absolutely a biological component to this as, across all societies across the globe, it's men who take the highest risks, be they unnecessary or conduc…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/08/21 08:58 AM
1

Then you'd also disagree that men are less risk averse, in general, or would also blame that on conditioning? Do you believe all differences are purely sociological and have no basis in our physical make up?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/08/21 08:00 AM
2

Let them. They're going to blame men, anyway, as they have for all time. Their fiction only has weight because people choose to kow tow to them, and their appeal to emotion. We don't so much choose not to live in fear but that aren't taught to fearmonger. Would you agree or disagree that, in terms of natural disposition, women are more likely to be fearful than men, with or without direction? Is there a correlation between that fear and one's physical capabilities in relation to one another and …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/08/21 08:11 AM
15

I'm going the other way with it. It actually is the point. Men are more likely to target men, so it makes sense for men to be more wary walking around at night. How is this, then, a women's issue when men are going to be victimized the majority of the time? If it's a gendered issue at all, and I don't think it is, then it's really a men's issue that we don't care about, because the vast majority of us choose not to live in fear, and actively engage in risk management. Women, meanwhile, will acti…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/08/21 11:04 AM
4

The mean effect size for these sex differences in total and upper body muscle mass and strength is about 3, which indicates less than 10% overlap between the male and female distributions, with 99.9% of females falling below the male mean. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/247233659_Costs_and_benefits_of_fat-free_mass_in_men_Relationship_to_mating_success_dietary_requirements_and_native_immunity When fat-free mass is considered, men are 40% heavier (Lassek & Gaulin, 2009; Mayhew & Salm, 1…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/07/21 02:25 PM
1

Same deal with walking behind women. I'm not doing anything wrong. If you have an issue, you can cross the street. I've got shit to do, and places to be, and I'm not going to slow down or take alternate routes to appease someone afraid of their own shadow.
/r/MensRights28/09/19 05:28 PM
1

No idea about Germany, but I found this: https://www.freep.com/story/news/local/michigan/macomb/2019/09/13/jonathan-vanderhagen-facebook-custody-judge-rancilio/2277473001/ https://www.freep.com/story/news/local/michigan/macomb/2019/09/13/judge-takes-stand-trial-man-accused-criticizing-her-facebook/2312035001/
/r/MensRights15/09/19 02:05 PM
3

https://www.webmd.com/depression/postpartum-depression/news/20080506/men-also-get-postpartum-depression#1 https://www.fatherly.com/health-science/yes-fathers-can-get-postpartum-depression-heres-deal/ http://time.com/5014221/postpartum-depression-men/ https://nypost.com/2017/09/06/dads-get-postpartum-depression-too-study/
/r/MensRights30/11/17 07:38 AM
1

Nah, it's about gender quotas: "We don't have enough women in the armed forces and we are trying to encourage more to be a part of that society, but there is no banning of men being recruited," he said. News Corp reported earlier that Australian Defence Force staff have been told to recruit only women, including in frontline combat roles, under threat of being reassigned if they ignore the directive in an attempt to increase the number of female soldiers in its ranks. The move had reportedly bee…
/r/MensRights11/08/17 09:32 AM
–

I'll quote myself: I think calling it incompetence is going a bit far Per the article I posted, de-identifying candidates, meaning stripping the application of information of information such as race, sex, religion, reduced the likelihood of women being selected. If women are being selected less, men are being selected more. Furthermore, when sex was made known, women were chosen more often, and men less. To reiterate, when sex is unknown, men get chosen more often. When sex is known, women get …
/r/MensRights30/06/17 02:30 PM
–

http://archive.is/LMnUy We anticipated this would have a positive impact on diversity — making it more likely that female candidates and those from ethnic minorities are selected for the shortlist," he said. "We found the opposite, that de-identifying candidates reduced the likelihood of women being selected for the shortlist."
/r/MensRights30/06/17 02:20 PM
–

They aren't better at HR. They just gravitate to it. Teachers were once primarily men, and as women flowed in and the pedo accusations increased, men decided it wasn't worth the trouble. That doesn't make women better teachers than men.
/r/MensRights07/05/17 08:05 AM
–

Sure is: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tuskegee_syphilis_experiment Experimentation on unwitting people isn't exactly new, and isn't the result of "the patriarchy".
/r/MensRights05/11/16 05:26 PM
–

Bonobo females also solve everything with sex, so if they want to go ahead and start working on that, I'm game.
/r/MensRights18/06/16 11:41 PM
3

If we were to treat them the way male pogues who lat-moved into infantry are treated, that'd mean treating them like shit until they proved they were worthy. You don't just hand out leadership billets when experience is very much the difference between life or death, success and failure. On top of that, if we treated them the way we treated men who managed to slither into leadership billets by way of time in grade or whatever, we'd probably be called sexists solely because now we're dealing with…
/r/MensRights17/12/15 04:14 PM
0

All that needs to be done is mandate women sign up for selective service once they turn 18. In the way that men have privileges attached to selective service, so should women. Now they're added to the selective service database, and should there be a draft, they'd be affected by the lottery system. Most men already sign up for selective service without even realizing it by way of getting a driver's license or state ID and the like, so it would also be true for women. We're just equalizing it, no…
/r/MensRights07/12/15 04:08 PM
–

People have been saying there will never be another draft for as long as drafts have been a thing. After Vietnam, a draft can't be instituted on a whim which, of course, is a good thing. But to say a nation can never compel its citizens to fight for its defense, even in the most dire of circumstances, seems strange and incredibly short-sighted. It's one of those things where, even if there's never another draft, we're better off having the option than not. So sure, having solely men register for…
/r/MensRights07/12/15 03:35 PM
1

It doesn't mean "more boots on the field". Each MOS is allotted a certain number of people. If anything, it means women will be taking slots from more physically capable men.
/r/MensRights04/12/15 07:55 AM
–

To every single person who is better than an WNBA player but gets paid less money for playing basketball. None of those people are in the NBA, so you're back to comparing unrelated leagues. There's no fundamental difference between sports and the other forms of the entertainment industry. Some people have the mindset of "winners and champions always get more" but that isn't always how it works. Popularity (by whatever means) is what matters, and not skill and talent. Yes, talent can help make yo…
/r/MensRights03/12/15 05:35 PM
1

I don't watch soccer, so I'm just guessing here, but Division A is comprised of the top 8 teams, and Division B are lower ranked teams and newcomers. It makes sense to me for the best teams to make more money than the others.
/r/MensRights03/12/15 03:35 PM
–

Lots of amateur teams and not-very-successful pro teams. So you're comparing the WNBA to...what? Weekend pick up games? Of course it does. Professional sports is part of the entertainment industry. In the entertainment industry, people pay to see what is popular and what they enjoy seeing - and that is not always the person who is the most talented. The tweet says she wants to combat the sports gender pay gap. That's why I'm talking about sports. I don't know why you keep including anything that…
/r/MensRights03/12/15 03:31 PM
–

The US women's team earns more money than a lot of men's teams who could beat them. Which teams? There are a lot of very skillful singers who are ugly, or older, or uncharismatic, and don't have what it takes to draw a large paying crowd.... but the not-so-talented Britney Spears has earned tens of millions of dollars. This has absolutely nothing to do with sports. You can't say male singers are physically superior to their female counterparts, and thus their ability to sing is better, drawing i…
/r/MensRights03/12/15 03:15 PM
–

Yes, and no. When it comes to individual-based sports, sometimes women being worse than men isn't an issue, because you're rooting for a specific person. When it comes to team sports, you don't get that, so it's just a slower, less exciting, less coordinated version of the male sport. That's why someone like Rousey can rise out of UFC (though that had more to do with marketing and the women's division being paper thin than anything else), but most people choose not to watch, say, the WNBA. Peopl…
/r/MensRights03/12/15 01:55 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter