TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Zakialwe Archive

View 0 posts and 16 comments by Zakialwe on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

I severely doubt it. The child is in care, and results from a statutory rape. Unlikely that in NZ the victim would need to pay...well you hope not.
/r/MensRights20/07/13 08:37 AM
5

Gotta agree with you. This kind of post does nothing to promote discussion, indeed probably the opposite. Still, easy karma...
/r/MensRights17/07/13 04:26 PM
3

"I really like being a woman. ... I like it more now because I think it's more of a privilege." Last page of the abc article
/r/MensRights25/05/13 11:50 PM
0

The UK Crown Prosecution Service defines harassment rather loosely as: 'causing alarm or distress' ... and 'putting people in fear of violence' I'm no judge but I don't see either of those two criteria. But that is why we have judges. To decide objectively whether those criteria are reasonably met. Surely harassment is inherently subjective? Yes, but subjective evidence relies on the defendant to prove themselves innocent. Whereas objective generally requires the accuser to prove guilt. This is …
/r/MensRights17/05/13 10:15 PM
3

You have not shown how this is connected at all to the original video. In the article it states that: Each side is only allotted five minutes to speak. There are no witnesses, beyond the parties themselves, and no allowed cross-examination. There are even limits on what kind of documents a party can submit before a trial to bolster their case. So clearly the commissioner is relying on a subjective "her word against his" argument. With the limited time frame they cannot possibly base their decisi…
/r/MensRights17/05/13 09:21 PM
4

Ah my apologies, I've linked the same article twice. I'm very sorry. Here you go. I highly recommend you read the whole article. If you want to skip just search "80".
/r/MensRights17/05/13 08:50 PM
5

Sadly that's an often reported myth. The framework I linked in my original comment is based around the idea of subjective evidence. ie. That no matter what actually happened if a person 'feels' harassed the accused must be punished despite what an objective observer may think. The principle of objective analysis is primary in criminal law as far as I find. Hence why "my word against theirs", whilst a valid and often used form of evidence, is not one that stands up to professional scrutiny very o…
/r/MensRights17/05/13 08:29 PM
5

If you cant read or press Ctrl + F then type 80% that's not my problem. [EDIT] My mistake I linked the same article twice. Apologies.
/r/MensRights17/05/13 08:10 PM
6

Everyone has the right to request evidence on claims. I have no problem attempting to provide it. [EDIT] Just noticed Grapeban is a /r/againstmensrights poster. Clearly here just to troll us into providing posts for them. Ah well, you try and have a reasoned discussion with some people...
/r/MensRights17/05/13 07:47 PM
8

Here in the UK it's rather difficult as the Government does not break these statistics down by gender, nor provide details on whether the case was based on the accuser as sole witness. However if you look at for example, the percentage of protection orders granted during divorce proceedings in the USA in 2010 (of which few states issue statistics) which are based solely on the word of one party, 80% of orders requested were granted. These orders instantly deprive the victim of access to their ho…
/r/MensRights17/05/13 07:38 PM
16

I think the main issue for me is that this is exactly the type of scenario where a subjective view of harassment, as being pushed onto US University campuses at the moment, could lead to 'his word against her's ' situations, in which a guy would likely lose. Luckily this man has his camera as evidence, but not everyone else will be so lucky. Making people aware of the potential abuses of these laws and frameworks is a good way of getting momentum behind stopping them.
/r/MensRights17/05/13 06:16 PM
5

Aye, this is in the Republic.
/r/MensRights17/05/13 06:08 PM
5

I agree for the reason that generally, we in this subreddit already know about the double standard men in our society face. We know the lies that the majority have been lead to believe. We don't need examples of people slagging off men on Facebook. So what? It's one woman/white knight. By highlighting this example we perpetuate the idea to any that come here looking for help and advice that all we do is bitch and moan. I think the best posts are those that bring evidence, cold hard statistics so…
/r/MensRights26/04/13 08:19 PM

See that's what its about for you. Women taking advantage. Whilst most people on MRs actually want equality some hint hint, you are willing to justify paying people, specifically women, less than someone else for the same job when they have the same qualifications etc. just because they aren't as good at it. I mean is there someone better than you at work who does your job? Probably. How would you feel if they got paid more because they were the bosses child/partner? But you cant afford a lawyer…
/r/MensRights18/05/12 07:48 PM

That means when there is no actual discrimination...they will have to start discriminating. Just wondering how do you see this occurring? If they have a justifiable reason, say wanting to retain a more highly skilled or educated worker whilst they train them for promotion, then thats fine. Why would they need to start discriminating on gender or whatever in that case? If they can't justify why they are paying one person more than another then they're clearly doing something wrong. There are doze…
/r/MensRights18/05/12 06:22 PM

Good. If I was in any nation and being paid less for doing the same job as someone else I'd sure want to know why. Shifting the burden of proof to the defender is not ideal, but if it helps people fight discrimination, be it gender, religion, sexuality whatever, that can only be a good thing.
/r/MensRights18/05/12 02:53 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter