TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Zambito1 Archive

View 0 posts and 29 comments by Zambito1 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
12

Defending child rapists... a bold strategy.
/r/MensRights24/03/23 08:08 PM
2

https://www.news18.com/news/india/chhattisgarh-bjp-councillor-beats-up-friends-wife-for-denying-sexual-favour-4123334.html FTFY Since I was downvoted, here is some reasons you should avoid AMP. https://old.reddit.com/r/AmputatorBot/comments/c88zm3/why_did_i_build_amputatorbot/
/r/PussyPassDenied27/08/21 11:11 AM
34

Its called pedophilia. That is what is wrong with them.
/r/PussyPass28/04/20 03:15 PM
1

I brought up Ada because computer science is what I'm most familiar with. Marie Curie was definitely awesome though.
/r/MensRights07/09/19 11:22 PM
1

OP then went on to say how another user was "BORN in a hospital built by men", broadening the scope of the context. And you're right, I am trying to do some damage control. You're damaging my reputation when I claim to support men's rights, because it puts me in the same box as people who dismiss the accomplishments of women. Even if we go back to the photo, the sign strongly implies that only men constructed the buildings that can be seen. If it's not doing that, then it is dismissing any women…
/r/MensRights07/09/19 11:15 PM
-1

The original post says "everything you see". You and I are both looking at computers, and therefore talking about computers is extremely relevant. I didn't forget about Alan Turing, I expected someone to bring him up. The problem is that OP is speaking in absolutes, making him incorrect with a single counter-example.
/r/MensRights07/09/19 07:42 PM
0

You are communicating to them using a computer, no? Hear of Ada Lovelace? You can celebrate the accomplishments of men without dismissing the accomplishments of women.
/r/MensRights07/09/19 05:49 PM
7

Wow, that was very disturbing.
/r/MensRights20/06/19 04:20 AM
6

No, women need to stop being as ruthless.
/r/MensRights30/05/19 10:16 PM
1

I was thinking too big picture. My thought was that if both parents are required to approve of a birth, both parents are given equal say, and both parents have equal responsibility. I see it's not so cut and dry though.
/r/MensRights30/05/19 01:02 PM
2

Sentence*
/r/MensRights30/05/19 12:31 PM
3

Or should a consent of just one of the parents be enough for abortion? That's even worse. Can you explain why that's worse?
/r/MensRights30/05/19 10:59 AM
0

Drugs
/r/MensRights25/11/18 12:00 AM
8

I think you missed their point. They could be so emotionally unstable that they aren't sure of anything. The post here doesn't have enough context to know the situation.
/r/MensRights24/11/18 11:58 PM
9

it centralizes in what women care most about; themselves. That describes literally everyone though. If you don't care most about yourself, you have your priorities messed up and you're probably going to be unhappy (with the exception of prioritizing a child). I'm a man, I'm on /r/MensRights because I care about myself.
/r/MensRights14/08/18 04:32 PM
13

Please don't lie about things like that, it hurts men's rights also.
/r/MensRights06/05/18 05:24 PM
1

Pedophiles*
/r/MensRights31/12/17 12:54 AM
1

Shutting up people you disagree with is... toxic? Yes.
/r/MensRights21/11/17 04:20 AM
1

One is intentionally toxic, the other is unintentionally toxic to a lesser degree. So yes there is a big difference, but neither is good.
/r/MensRights20/11/17 02:22 PM
1

They both create actual echo chambers. If you have to go searching for other opinions rather than having them right there with the popular opinions, more people tend to only see what they agree with. Being an echo chamber is not a binary state, subreddits that enforce opinions through banning are obviously more toxic than other subreddits, but every subreddit trends towards something, and sorts it's content accordingly. Why would I sort it that way? Because I would rather see content that promot…
/r/MensRights20/11/17 04:29 AM
-1

I don't know how it's my fault Reddit is an echo chamber but okay. Just because other subreddits are worse because they ban other points of view, but being downvoted to oblivion still trends towards echo chamber characteristics. If I could I'd sort content by most replies I feel like that would have the least bias.
/r/MensRights20/11/17 01:49 AM
1

Sure they won't ban you from here for disagreeing but you'll be downvoted out of view. That's just how Reddit works. And in more political subreddits, both sides do ban for disagreeing.
/r/MensRights19/11/17 08:39 PM
8

That's not exclusive to /r/Feminism. Reddit in general is designed to foster echo chambers.
/r/MensRights19/11/17 07:06 PM
9

I think everyone here is missing he was clearly baiting the feminist to use their own lines against themselves.
/r/MensRights19/11/17 07:04 PM
1

Social issues go both ways.
/r/MensRights19/11/17 04:17 PM
2

Stupid that I can't be pro both. There are obviously social issues that go both ways but you're only allowed to talk about one side.
/r/MensRights19/11/17 04:16 PM
19

I read that as 95% of men are homeless lol
/r/MensRights02/07/17 07:04 AM
11

Lmao the last one is gold
/r/MensRights07/06/17 06:24 PM
2

Never forget r/news
/r/PussyPass04/04/17 03:05 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter