TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Zaragor Archive

View 0 posts and 11 comments by Zaragor on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

That was rather rude, so let me explain. In a STEM science, you'd be absolutely right. Physics is constant, and a universal law can be assumed to be unchanging. Therefore, more time to disprove makes it more robust. The same cannot be said for rape statistics however. There is no way to know if the unreported rape rate was the same 20 years ago - in fact I would assume it's higher, with recent feminist education programmes. So in this, assuming sample size and data collection and so forth are th…
/r/MensRights08/01/13 06:30 PM
3

Seriously? Women have no social skills or interests, they just rely on artifical manipulation of sexual worth to make all their friends? And then the example you use of hobbies they should pick up is Skyrim. Women strangely have as many interests and talents as men do. Just because you don't enjoy them doesn't make them unworthy.
/r/MensRights02/01/13 02:32 AM
1

You make a good point, but I think you're making a fairly big statistical error by using the lifetime figures. Simply from the report, and assuming the average age is 30 (Taken from (xkcd)[http://xkcd.com/1093/], but I think pretty reliable), either 140,000 men were raped in every year since 1980 and then 1,267,000 in 2010, or most men forgot earlier rapes. Women do appear experience the same phenomenon, but at a much lower rate. Since we can pretty safely assume rape rates have decreased for th…
/r/MensRights26/12/12 07:25 PM
49

I hope you realize this attitude is just as detrimental to guys as it is to women. The point of the argument is not that every woman has a higher sexual appetite than every man, just that your gender doesn't really affect how much you enjoy sex. Expecting guys to have a higher sex drive as you seem to forces those who don't to perform when they don't want to, just as it forces women to pretend they don't want to. Neither is healthy.
/r/MensRights16/12/12 12:37 AM
0

You are seriously a misogynist. I know the term is bandied about a lot around here, mostly by trolls or those without arguments, but I genuinely feel it's fair in this case. Assuming 'a long term relationship' is guaranteed to burn you, and advising guys stay away from being romantically attached to women because on average they're hateful she-devils is horrible.
/r/MensRights26/11/12 01:06 PM
1

To be fair, this is in England, where nobody pays health insurance anyway. Like me, none of these women have ever heard that health insurance is higher for them, since it's just not encountered.
/r/MensRights13/11/12 10:53 AM
1

Yeah, and imagine if you were paying what you are now when you were 18, with the added young persons bonus (2000 - 5000 depending on the car). Also, since you're at least 26, I'm guessing that your job is slightly better paid than working in a shop and vlogging about fashion. So not in the slightest way comparable.
/r/MensRights13/11/12 10:50 AM
1

I couldn't get more than a third of the way through the article without giving up. The article said that all men want sex above all else, and I feel that just isn't true. To quote from the second paragraph 'All of those things that West says a woman should cultivate instead of beauty and attractiveness, those things that make her a “real” woman? Here’s a newsflash: they aren’t inherently attractive.' I dislike this attitude. Unless we as a mens rights movement can't support every type of masculi…
/r/MensRights02/05/12 04:30 PM
28

Of course this is fucking crazy. No man has any right to tell a woman what to do with her body. If it was ever implemented, I think the furthest it's reasonable to go is to make the woman present some evidence of having attempted to talk to the father of the baby.
/r/MensRights22/03/12 09:46 PM
5

Upon further investigation, I drifted upon some other statements she made on the subject. Firstly, in her statement, the MP never specified men, just people. It's the media who say men, not the actual statement. On top of that she actually said that most people would be sympathetic if the police decided it was worthwhile.. That is a far cry from actively urging police to conduct DNA tests on every man.
/r/MensRights09/01/11 07:46 PM
1

As a whole women spend more money? Do you have any proof for this? I don't mean 'my girlfriend blows my cash on shoes and handbags', but actual empirical data. All the rest I have seen statistics for, but that is totally unjustified.
/r/MensRights29/11/10 06:02 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter