| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Physical attractiveness more strongly affects social mobility (education, occupation, and income) for males than females.Yes, they should’ve done iq tests and taken those into consideration; because they didn’t this is a bunch of useless data. Health is absolutely asinine as a proxy for iq. I guess Stephen Hawking would’ve been assumed low iq by these researchers right? This “study” loses all credibility by using that proxy. | /r/BlackPillScience | 22/11/23 10:33 PM |
| 3 | Physical attractiveness more strongly affects social mobility (education, occupation, and income) for males than females.Leaving out actual IQ renders this entire thing useless. IQ is, bar-none, the number one predictor of lifelong success. I could easily argue that a highly intelligent, average male could be successful enough marry a highly attractive female which would lead to having attractive kids who are also high iq. Given mens propensity to take more risk, work longer hours, be more willing to move, less likely to take time off for children, etc this would put them at the top of the success hierarchy. This … | /r/BlackPillScience | 22/11/23 09:17 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter