TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ZealousidealWish9392 Archive

View 0 posts and 250 comments by ZealousidealWish9392 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

About a third of primates are monogamous, and humans are in that group.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/24 01:23 AM
1

35% of men are shorter than 5'8" but only 10% of women would date a 5'7" or shorter man
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/24 08:08 PM
1

Shortness is a superior physiological trait compared to tallness. Short people live longer, get all diseases at lower rates, are generally more intelligent, are superior in fights with weapons, and require less energy to function. Short men are superior to tall men, which is why genetic engineering is going to be used to make men short, not tall.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/24 03:49 PM
1

Can you explain specifically why you think it wouldn't work? You keep saying this but you're not actually explaining why. Why would it be bad to make men small and women large?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/23 12:30 PM
1

How does making everyone more intelligent and women bigger than men only benefit me? I don't get why you think it wouldn't work. Why would small men and large women make society disfunctional? That sounds crazy, tbh.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/23 12:28 PM
1

Cope
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/23 12:19 PM
1

Why do you think the system would never work? It would be better for the people in it
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/23 05:02 AM
1

Yea, I don't want us to be human but something else, something better. You're completely right there. I don't think that it removes subjective experiences and interests. People will still have interests and passions.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/23 05:15 PM
1

I'm not tall, although I have a nice face. I'm not an incel. I'm currently single though but I've had girlfriends in the past. Think about this: Everyone is talking about how it's about personality and being good men. Which is great! That's exactly what we want! But then when i say "okay, so what if men were smaller than women" you start freaking out and pretending like this is a bad idea. Which means it's not about personality, is it? I want you to clearly explain why you think it would be a ba…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/23 04:56 PM
1

Cope bro. This is literally fundamental evolutionary biology; Fecundity advantage hypothesis and male-on-male competition. Females are larger than males in the vast majority of animals precisely because it is more efficient. In species where males engage in fighting for harems, males get larger. Otherwise there's no point for males to be larger.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/23 04:48 PM
1

It's both women and men. I want to modify the species as a whole. I don't think it's cringe. There are deep biological reasons for why female-biased size dimorphism is more efficient. Male biased size dimorphism is seen in species where males engage in physical competition (fighting) to dominate harems. If that social structure doesn't happen there's no reason for males to be larger than females. Small men are healthier, live longer, and use fewer resources. Tall women can be modified to gestate…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/23 04:44 PM
1

You're literally just going down my profile and commenting and downvoting every post, and then saying you aren't angry. It's cringe.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/23 04:40 PM
1

You're commenting on every one of my posts right now. Chill out, you're clearly angry
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/23 04:38 PM
1

You wrote several comments across several threads and stuff. so I'm just going to respond to this one for both of them. If you actually look through my comment history, I have several month-long gaps when I'm busy. I'm not that busy right now, so I'm posting a lot. The last time I posted was a month ago. Anyway, I still don't understand why
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/23 04:32 PM
1

I've had girlfriends in the past but I'm currently single. It seems my post has been posted across reddit out of context so you don't fully understand what I actually think and why.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/23 03:11 PM
1

Why? That's never going to happen btw
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/23 03:04 PM
1

You're not making sense, and based on the spacing in this post I think you're upset and it's causing you to type erratically. I do, in fact, have a master's degree in computational biology and bioinformatics. I've said this multiple times when necessary, but I don't bring it up if it's not needed. Why would I? I never said that couples outside only have "99 foot tall men" with women, what a ridiculous strawman. Whether or not that is even true wouldn't change anything about what I'm saying. I ne…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/23 02:54 PM
1

I have a master's degree in computational biology and I'm pursuing a doctorate. I can explain my idea at length in detail. I haven't done so because I was going to do it in it's own thread.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/23 02:36 PM
1

First of all, you wouldn't like all the men. You'd just be attracted to most of them physically. Then it would come down to which guy has a better personality, has more similar interests, or whatever. If there are multiple, then you all can just form a polygamous group and bang each other. That's fine with me. If anything, that's a good thing, as it means women can diversify their genetic information. Ultimately, I want to modify men to be much smaller than you, and women will be very tall, thic…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/23 01:57 PM
1

Why not in my scenario? There would be a lot of sex and reproduction with everyone, but people would also pursue their interests and hobbies and ideas. They aren't exclusive. Why do you think they are exclusive?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/23 01:44 PM
1

Then you're already behaving in the way that I was talking about, so you're in agreement with me. If a woman rejects a man because she doesn't like his personality or whatever, then that's exactly what I want. But if a woman does like a man's personality, but "he's too short" or some shit and rejects him for that, then that's what I have a problem with. I'm not discussing situations where bad guys are rejected for being bad. I'm talking about situations where good guys are rejected because they …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/23 12:35 PM
1

I didn't see this, sorry. No, I'm not afraid of that.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/23 12:26 PM
1

We can have a world with a lot of sex but also intellectual and artistic pursuits. They aren't exclusive.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/23 12:11 PM
1

I am talking about that though. You don't understand what my idea is. The only reason I'm specifying women is because this thread is about women. I want to modify men's brains and bodies as well, which I have explained in other posts.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/23 12:06 PM
1

You can't comprehend it because you're misunderstanding my motivation and my background. I'm not an incel. I'm actually quite handsome and very academically successful. I've had several girlfriends, I have a lot of friends, and I go to therapy. I do all the things that you all always say. I still believe that we should genetically modify men to be small, women to be large, and humans to pair bond and become a matriarchal species. Now what? What about this do you find so bad? Why would it be bad …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/23 12:03 PM
1

Why wouldn't you want a matriarchy, whether it's emphasizing sex or not? Also just to let you know, matriarchy in mammals is very often sexual (see bonobos, or hyenas, or many others).
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/23 11:14 PM
1

If we can express the pair-bonding mechanism in humans, then we can express female-biased dimorphism, and your question about "how do we deal with red flags or violent men" is dissolved. We'll become a matriarchy. What's wrong with this?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/23 11:01 PM
1

Yes it does. We will be a lot smaller than you and pair-bonded, so we'll spend our time running around making you food and giving you massages and stuff. Basically I want a matriarchy
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/23 10:57 PM
1

I will genetically modify men to be small and athletic, and women to be giant and fecund, who gestate litters each pregnancy.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/23 10:50 PM
1

I want to make men small and women large
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/23 10:38 PM
1

You don't even know what I think though
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/23 10:23 PM
1

I don't know what that is
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/23 10:10 PM
1

For both. Modifying men to be small and women to be large and super fecund is the optimization in terms of resources and fertility.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/23 09:54 PM
1

It is tangible. Genetic modification of humans is inevitable.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/23 09:46 PM
1

Ok. But can I ask why you don't like the idea of the matriarchy that I describe?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/23 09:28 PM
1

I've already done all of those things. I've had several girlfriends in my life (although I'm currently single), I have a great group of friends, I do go to therapy. I still believe that we should genetically modify men to be small, women to be large, and for humans to pair-bond. I can prove it's efficiency mathematically if you want, but I was going to do that in its own thread.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/23 09:15 PM
1

lmao except it isn't. This is the behavior we observe in other pair-bonded animal species. That's how it would be for humans, and you disagreeing and saying its "dumb" doesn't mean anything. This is where your own ignorance is messing with your ability to understand why you're wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/23 09:05 PM
1

Because if we're all smaller than you and men and women have been programmed to pair-bond, then we'll be happiest running around and bringing you food and giving you massages and stuff. All those institutions won't exist in the first place because we'll be a matriarchy and not a patriarchy.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/23 08:50 PM
1

But I did ask for you to explain it to me, I wasn't assuming that I knew the answer. Which is why I asked you to explain it clearly. However I didn't only say that men should be smaller than women, I also stipulated "both sexes are programmed to pair-bond". Don't imagine a situation where it's just small men and large women but we behave in a similar fashion to how we behave now, that's not what I'm discussing.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/23 08:24 PM
1

Thought so
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/23 08:06 PM
0

You found this from the other thread where it was cross posted right? Everyone in that thread on r/NotHowGirlsWork is in agreement with me and you just don't realize it.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/23 07:37 PM
1

What do you disagree with though?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/23 07:35 PM
1

How do you know you won't agree with me before you know what I'm saying?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/23 07:16 PM
1

Explain clearly why men being smaller than women, and men and women being programmed to pair-bond like prairie voles, wouldn't solve the domestic violence issue against women (this isn't the only benefit of the dimorphism but again that's outside of the scope of this conversation). The only reason you are against what I'm saying is because you don't like the idea of men being smaller than you.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/23 07:11 PM
1

Let me spell this out for you: Yes, it is a solution. It's not the only one, but it would solve the issue, and claiming otherwise is simply incorrect.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/23 06:56 PM
0

I've actually been in therapy for a while. Anyway I think I'll just make a thread explaining my idea more in depth because a lot of people don't understand what I'm saying. Someone cross-posted my post to another subreddit and everyone there is misunderstanding what I'm saying and what my reasoning is. I think when I explain everything, you'll agree with me.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/23 06:55 PM
1

So wait, you don't care about violence against women? I don't understand what you're saying, you're contradicting yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/23 06:53 PM
1

I want to genetically modify men to be small and you women to be large, which will deal with the abuse and stuff you're talking about. But again this is outside of the scope of this conversation.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/23 06:27 PM
0

lol what? What are you even talking about? You don't understand what my philosophy is at all. I'm thinking I'll just make a thread about it, instead of just commenting here all over the place. Anyway, I'm pro-choice when it comes to abortion I don't know why you'd think otherwise.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/23 05:41 PM
0

I've been in relationships. For me, it's not enough that I'm well off. If other people are sad and struggling, that makes me angry, and I want to help because I'm not a piece of shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/23 05:30 PM
1

Ph.D student. I'm sorry but I'm afraid to tell you which university because I'm afraid you'll try to find me and get me. I've lost over 30 comment karma in this thread already, people hate me and they want to kill me. Anyway I'm willing to explain stuff to you if you want, I love this stuff. I'm about to go to bed but if you have questions I can explain things and teach you stuff tomorrow or in the future or whenever. Thank you for being interested in my ideas!
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/23 03:04 AM
0

Where is this calculator?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/23 02:11 AM
1

I think you're not very intelligent, because you're misunderstaning how attraction works. Also, you haven't made a single correct argument here. You don't actually know what you're talking about. "choice" means you can choose to change it moron. Can you choose to be gay? No, because it's not a choice. If you can't understand this I don't know what to tell you. We're still going to genetically modify women's brains so it doesn't matter. Cope about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/23 01:59 AM
1

No, you see that's the problem. If it were freedom of choice, then women could just choose to be equally attracted to a man who makes less money as one who makes more. They would just choose to like short men as much as tall ones. If they didn't, then they'd be the same as racists. Think about it; if you can choose to not care about a person's race, but you choose to care and think of a certain race as worse than another one (you use your freedom of choice to choose to be this way), then you are…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/23 01:51 AM
1

No. You're just drawing arbitrary delineations around "acceptable" forms of attraction vs unacceptable ones. Why should we care that women have restricted sexual preferences that cause them to dislike the vast majority of men? Why should that be respected at all, especially when we can change it, and the change would be better for everyone (including women)? Literally you're basically just saying "why would women like a nice guy who isn't sexy??" You're literally making the worst possible argume…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/23 01:42 AM
1

Yea, you're wrong. "Genuine attraction" is simply the firing of certain neurons in certain brain regions in response to sensory stimuli (or mental but it is funneled through sensory regions of the brain). When we modify women's brains using these AAVs, they will experience genuine attraction. They will feel equally turned on by a larger range of men. Why do you think modifying women so they don't care about height, for example, is somehow immoral?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/23 01:19 AM
1

This is precisely why you're incorrect. I explained it in another comment so I'll just copy it. If women were genuinely equally sexually aroused by a 5'1" dude with a bowl cut and a 4 inch penis vs a 6'6" dude with an 8 inch penis, then it would purely come down to which one she had a better personality compatibility with and all that stuff. Whether she liked one guy more than the other would purely be a result of their individual personalities and how well they got along and all that, and in ei…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/23 01:08 AM
1

No I dated one girl through highschool actually. She was my first love. Another girl I dated cheated on me, which hurt a lot to be honest and caused me to distrust women for a while, but I got over that.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/23 01:02 AM
1

Yes. Also to be clear, the only reason I'm specifying women here is because of the topic of the thread. I want to genetically modify men as well in certain ways but that's not what this thread is about.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/23 01:01 AM
1

This is incorrect. I've had 7 girlfriends in my life, although I'm currently single.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/23 12:55 AM
1

Hello
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/23 12:26 AM
1

But it doesn't take away your autonomy. Increasing sexual preferences INCREASES autonomy. You'd be exactly as you are now, but you'll just find more men attractive. You won't care about how much money a guy makes or how tall he is. Otherwise, you'll still prefer the funnier guy, or the guy who shares your interests and ideals etc. But you wont care at all if he's shorter than you or not that handsome or whatever. This would be better for everyone. I honestly think it's going to happen before the…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/23 12:24 AM
2

If you were genuinely equally sexually aroused by a 5'1" dude with a bowl cut and a 4 inch penis vs a 6'6" dude with an 8 inch penis, then it would purely come down to which one you had a better personality compatibility with and all that stuff. Whether you liked one guy more than the other would purely be a result of your individual personalities and how well you got along and all that, and in either case you'd be equally sexually satisfied so you literally have nothing to lose. You have nothin…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/23 12:15 AM
1

I'm not God but I control genetics
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/23 11:38 PM
1

We will solve this by modifying women's brains so that you find the "nice guys" equally attractive
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/23 11:29 PM
1

Why do people care so much about "bodycount"? I don't get it.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/23 11:25 PM
2

Why do you think a few people on this sub "not taking me seriously" matters? I'm smarter than you guys. When I achieve the modification, then nation states will force it on their populations in order to stop the fertility crises and deal with the current demographic problems. I'm just letting you guys know how these problems are actually going to be dealt with. We aren't going to let men become isolated and angry, that's a disaster for everyone. We aren't going to "replace women with sex robots"…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/23 10:59 PM
-1

But those saying that it would not matter even if the most dire stats were real are also delusional. I don't understand where they're coming from at all. It's really weird to think that society would function, and it's even weirder to think that you somehow have the moral position when your position is basically that a huge percentage of the population deserves to be lonely.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/23 10:48 PM
0

This is literally the goal of my research. I'm working on inducing pair bonding in non-monogamous mammals. Prairie voles naturally pair-bond, so by studying the neuroendocrinological mechanisms, it should be possible to induce it in other mammal species. From there we can express female-biased sexual size dimorphism in humans, which has a whole host of valuable properties that we would want for society.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/23 10:23 PM
3

What tantrum would that be? I'm correct about what I'm saying and I'm correct about the current and future state of the technologies that I'm discussing.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/23 10:21 PM
0

I already linked this in another comment. We've succeeding in modifying rat neurons in vivo. https://www.cell.com/neuron/pdf/S0896-6273(19)30062-5.pdf30062-5.pdf) Don't compare rudimentary shit from the 50's with modern genetic modification technology. Within the next year or two we'll be able to modify human brains to increase pair-bonding ability and to make it so that women don't care about things like money or height anymore. This will only be a good thing for everyone. Why would you ever ev…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/23 10:20 PM
3

Abortion isn't "killing babies".
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/23 10:02 PM
4

Nope. Seriously, I want the women here to think about what's happening here. You're literally throwing a tantrum being told that you have to stop caring so much about how much money a guy makes or how tall he is, and yet you think you're the ones who are morally correct? One person said we should just cut off men's balls and feed them heroin. It doesn't make any sense. No, the actual problem is that women don't find men as attractive as men find women. There are neurological reasons for this, an…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/23 09:58 PM
1

Well, I disagree. If we as a society modify women's brains so that you are as sexually aroused by a 5'1" asian dude with a 4 inch dick and a bowlcut as you are by a 6'6" mixed race guy with an 8 inch penis, and the only thing that mattered was the actual personality and interests and stuff, EVERYONE would be better off. You would be better off because you wouldn't feel like you're settling sexually and you would be more aroused by your partners, and men would be better off for obvious reason - i…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/23 09:50 PM
1

Wow, a typo! Pathetic.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/23 09:36 PM
1

Let me try to explain it like this: If you want someone who has similar interests to you or has a similar level of education or whatever, I think that's fine. I'm talking about physical attributes that men can't control but that women care about too much. Imagine if over half of men said "women with breasts smaller than DD aren't attractive and aren't real women!" And just outright refused to date women who had normal sized breasts. That would be insane. But women are doing this for height (in f…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/23 09:34 PM
0

I have a master's degree in computational biology and I'm pursing a Ph.D
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/23 09:28 PM
0

No, you don't.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/23 09:24 PM
0

Nope. You don't have an argument here other than to reinforce classist structures and just hatred towards other humans for things outside of their control. You didn't choose to be born upper middle class. You didn't choose to be born a woman. No one chooses the circumstances of their birth. Which means no one has a right to defend their privilege from it. Also no, tall men are not superior to short ones. In fact, short men are superior, but that gets into a different conversation that I don't wa…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/23 09:20 PM
-1

It isn't. We've already succeeding in modifying rat neurons in-vivo with pills: https://www.cell.com/neuron/pdf/S0896-6273(19)30062-5.pdf30062-5.pdf) This isn't invasive at all. EDIT: I want you to seriously think about what you're saying here. You're literally saying that it's preferable to cut off men's balls rather than for women to just stop caring so much about money and height, and yet you think you're the one who is morally righteous? It's cringe, you're coping.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/23 09:18 PM
0

That's my entire point. We can modify your brains so you find most men attractive just like men find most women attractive. You wouldn't lose anything, as you'll still find the men you find attractive attractive. It's just now you'll also find other guys attractive that you otherwise wouldn't like. So from there, it becomes a situation where EVERYONE is okay with what other people look like, and we can focus solely on things like hobbies and personality etc. You wouldn't lose anything. And yes, …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/23 09:06 PM
1

No need to be worried about me then, I don't believe in anything nonsensical.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/23 08:58 PM
-1

You don't understand genetics nor do you understand human reproductive history.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/23 08:53 PM
-2

That's good, so there's nothing to worry about.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/23 08:48 PM
1

"Social darwnism" loses against genetic modification. Take two competing nations, one which is "socially darwinist" in the way you're saying, where half OR MORE males are sexually frustrated and angry, most babies are had out of wedlock, and women resent men because of fucked up dating markets. Compare that to a society where women and men have been genetically modified to be very intelligent, as well as to pair-bond and raise a lot of children. The latter will win every time. There's no way aro…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/23 08:47 PM
-7

Hopefully it doesn't happen but that's what the trends indicate.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/23 08:45 PM
1

But this is wrong. Half the population are men. If you think it's going to be the case that 40% of the entire population (the 80% of men that you're saying deserve to be alone) will just "get over it" you're insane.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/23 08:42 PM
-4

I understand that a lot of you find it uncomfortable, but ultimately we're going to have to genetically modify women's brains so that they find pretty much all men attractive, just like men find pretty much all women attractive. We've succeeded in modifying mouse neurons in vivo, and we've isolated the regions of the brain which correspond to sexual arousal and pair-bonding in humans. We can and will modify to increase these regions in both sexes in a few years. Before the end of the decade we'l…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/23 08:33 PM
-7

But that's wrong. You really think governments and states, which are just composed of people half of which are men, are going to accept a situation where 80%+ of men are told they will never have love or sex? No, we're just going to genetically modify women's brains so you lower your standards. There is no reason to allow you to care so much about wealth and height anymore.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/23 08:28 PM
1

But that isn't going to last very long when it's the vast majority of men.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/23 08:23 PM
1

It's not a revenge fantasy, because there would be no revenge taken. EDIT: I think I'm not clear with what I mean. It wouldn't be a "revenge fantasy" because there is no "revenge" in telling women they can't isolate sex around a small group of men. That isn't a "revengeful" thing or whatever, it's basic common sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/23 08:22 PM
-5

That's wrong though, we are socially going to have to force women to start choosing other people.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/23 08:03 PM
0

We're about ~2 years away from genetically modifying women's brains, so that they no longer have physical preferences for men. Once women are genuinely equally sexually aroused by a 5'1" Asian dude with a bowl cut and a 3 inch dick as she is to a 6'6" muscular guy with an 8 inch dick, everything will fall into place. If you think this isn't going to happen, you're coping to an extreme. This is inevitable, it will happen before the end of this decade.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/23 03:47 PM
1

Why would you not want to care for your children and wife?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/23 02:12 AM
0

Why not?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/23 02:09 AM
1

Wait are you a woman or a man? I'm just wondering, I thought you were male. Yes, I will be able to convince people, especially young zoomer males who all LOVE mommy dommy giantess shit, to go along with this. Once I have the young zoomer men, I will have the world.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/23 02:08 AM
1

https://academic.oup.com/genetics/article/210/2/477/5931053?login=false
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/23 02:03 AM
–

Men like women of all heights. I know that most women just want men who are taller and that the whole 6 foot thing is a meme. My point is that men should be shorter and smaller than women, so this doesn't actually make a difference.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/23 01:56 AM
1

I don't care, I want a world where all men are "beta bucks" and are good fathers to their children.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/23 01:46 AM
1

Genetic modification
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/23 01:44 AM
1

Creepy
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/23 01:36 AM
1

No, humans are going to be genetically modified to make all men small and all women tall before the end of the decade.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/23 01:35 AM
–

This is part of the problem that I am going to solve
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/23 01:31 AM
1

All of the people, both the women and men, will want to do it once their sexual response has been modified to react in that fashion. Yes the women will love fucking the tiny monkey men and the men will like fucking the giantesses. There is nothing about this that's impossible within neuroendochronology.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/23 01:27 AM
1

We will genetically modify everyone, not just women. I'm not only talking about women here.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/23 01:26 AM
1

I answered this in the other post
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/23 01:23 AM
1

We're going to genetically modify humans in a few years, you ignoring my posts isn't going to stop it. Most men will follow me and from there I will get what I want.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/23 01:23 AM
1

Yes, I am saying to genetically modify men to be about 4'4" but lean and agile, who can run fast and jump several feet in the air, but who require only a few hundred calories per day. They will be sort of like boys on steroids, strong enough to work and function perfectly in society, and handle firearms and such, but much smaller than the women. Women will be modified to be around 6'5" and thick, with thick legs and big hips and big butts, who super ovulate and release 3 or 4 eggs each ovulation…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/23 01:21 AM
1

It's not weird, it is a fetish, and it is also the future of our species and the ideal sexual dimorphism. We will become a monogamous species, that pair bond, with large women who gestate litters of babies and small men who use only a few hundred calories per day. All the women and men will be very intelligent. In this way we will have a species which uses fewer resources to support larger population sizes, which expands exponentially even assuming only a single pregnancy per woman, and which ha…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/23 01:09 AM
1

We're going to genetically modify men to be small and women to be large
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/23 01:08 AM
1

I dont even study physics, I study bioinformatics. I do not solve these equations that often in my life, so it took me longer to do so. If I were to tell him to construct a phylogenetic tree it would also be a shitty "debate" technique. Fuck this autist loser
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/23 01:05 AM
–

There's literally only going to be small men and tall women in the near future
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/23 12:57 AM
–

I've been saying what I think, I spoke to one of the mods already and she got angry at me but ultimately I can post so long as it's on topic.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/23 12:55 AM
1

Why not?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/23 12:44 AM
1

Nope, it's a utopian inevitability. A society where everyone falls in love, everyone cares about each other and works together and everyone has families is not and never will be a dystopia. The actual dystopia is what you described. Where literally millions and millions and millions of people are sad and lonely and will never find love, just because humans have objectively obsolete hardware and programming from thousands of years ago which have no place in the modern or future world. THAT is the…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/23 12:41 AM
1

I'm also a liberal atheist. Saying some people deserve to be alone for their life just because they happened to be born male is not and never will be an acceptable solution to this problem. The actual solution is to modify women's sexual response to be near equal to men, so that all women find pretty much all men attractive, and from there no more lonely men or women will exist anymore.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/23 12:29 AM
2

And men don't have to be chads, there are plenty of non-chad men in love and relationships. What do you think the solution is to all the problems talked about on this sub?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/23 12:20 AM
2

Comparing yourself to other people is always a recipe for insecurity. I don't think we should call it delusional, not in the world of the Algorithm which funnels people through these pipelines.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/23 12:09 AM
4

Men shouldn't have to be chads in order to get love from women just like women shouldn't have to be stacies to get love from men.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 11:52 PM
–

I don't see why it's an insult for a woman to say you're husband material if she personally doesn't find you attractive. It's not her fault you can't control who you find attractive
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 11:49 PM
1

Do you mean that guys who call themselves "alpha" are just losers who are coping with not getting married (i.e. by not being the "betas" or whatever?)
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 11:41 PM
1

Dude we're less than 10 years away from being able to genetically modify somatic cells en masse We're going to genetically modify women to find pretty much every man attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 11:34 PM
5

Aren't you like 15
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 11:32 PM
1

Superhero movies are also terrible because of the corniness. I hate musicals and I hate superhero movies and I will never apologize for it
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 11:28 PM
0

I lied. I'm not very good at insulting people I don't know how to do it. I don't like to hurt people's feelings
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 11:25 PM
0

I don't know you, and I have no problems with you so I don't know how I'd insult you personally. Tell me things about yourself that are embarrassing or sad and pathetic and I'll see what I can do.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 11:18 PM
1

What do you think is a possible solution?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 11:11 PM
0

I can come up with better insults than that lol
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 11:09 PM
0

Not everyone is everyone's type. You can't blame people for this. This is not something we can fix yet, we need to wait for neurogenerative gene therapies to become more effective, so that we can modify people (mostly women in this case but men too in other ways) to have quicker sexual responses to a wider range of people.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 10:55 PM
1

But I'm right about what I'm saying and you know it.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 10:53 PM
1

Yes need for more babies. Spread humans and human love as far as possible in this universe
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 10:50 PM
1

Disposable like the girls who were sex-selectively aborted because they were female? China fucked itself and more ways than one with this. Although I still think China may be one of the countries that would implement my idea first, so I'm holding some hope for them.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 10:46 PM
1

China is freaking out about the surplus and constantly trying to figure out what to do about it
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 10:38 PM
1

Do you think that's why you are able to see why I'm correct about my idea, while other people might willingly blind themselves to the reality?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 10:34 PM
1

Just stop being annoying and your autism won't be a problem for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 10:33 PM
1

What is it that you feel or think you really need which would make your life better? It really comes down to dating and love? I'm asking in earnest I would like to know what you think
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 10:22 PM
1

Dude just kill yourself already if you hate yourself so much
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 10:13 PM
3

I guess I didn't know it was used in that way. What would these "obvious reasons" be?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 10:09 PM
1

Are you an autistic woman?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 09:55 PM
1

I think we should raise wages and should have universal healthcare. I don't think this will help with getting people together and making babies
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 09:46 PM
1

I actually disagree with you on this, and I think it is/should be part of politics and the state to figure out how to get people together and making babies.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 09:28 PM
1

I've never seen a platform like this from the left. Do you mean that the general leftist ideal to have universal health care (including mental healthcare) includes this? I swear to god I have no idea what you people are talking about half the time
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 09:27 PM
1

Get off reddit if you're at a birthday party, what are you doing
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 09:26 PM
1

Musicals are corny and I don't like them
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 09:17 PM
1

Yea I don't like this guy. He made me do math and then ignored me
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 09:15 PM
1

I think I read that bonobos are actually less promiscuous than chimpanzees but I could be wrong about that
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 08:47 PM
6

If a woman thought of me as husband material in general, but she personally did not want to marry me, I would not take that as an insult. She's saying that I'm a good guy for multiple reasons but for whatever reason, I'm not the one for her. I've felt the same way to some women in the past.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 08:46 PM
1

I was just talking about sexually reproducing animals in general. Among mammals monogamy is rare, but it's actually common in primates.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 08:32 PM
1

I see. Reading through your comment history, you're like 5'1" with a 6' wife. Why would you be against what I'm preaching?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 08:28 PM
1

I did the fucking math like 2 hours ago. Swear your allegiance to me like you said you would.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 08:11 PM
6

What aversion to being seen as husband material? I don't understand what the fuck half of you people are talking about on this subreddit you all say fucking stupid shit all the time
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 07:55 PM
1

Why are you behaving like this?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 07:49 PM
1

I've been reading through your comments and dude you are depressing the shit out of me and making me angry at the same time.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 07:42 PM
1

Are you the guy I would argue with on the chan before I pissed the mods off so much that they perma'd me?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 07:34 PM
1

Can you substantiate your claim instead of just calling me evil?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 07:26 PM
1

It takes a village.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 07:17 PM
1

Why do you think that's dark? I don't see it that way
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 07:15 PM
1

We're going to genetically modify humans to increase monogamous pair-bonding behavior, as well as to make men small and athletic and women large and fecund, who gestate litters of babies each pregnancy. This is the ideal dimorphism given modern and future technology.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 07:09 PM
1

Be proud of your accomplishments! But I don't think you should turn it into arrogance you know? What are your degrees in? You and I were just having this conversation, I just got my master's this spring in bioinformatics.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 06:59 PM
1

Monogamy is considered to be a beneficial mating strategy for females in evolutionary biology, because they reduce their own energy expenditure by having a partner help raise the offspring with them.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 06:56 PM
1

You shouldn't be arrogant, it's off-putting
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 06:53 PM
1

Like a 9
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 06:48 PM
1

Men will be small and women will be large in the future
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 06:43 PM
1

Dude I answered your question, I'll look it over to see if I got the number wrong but I did answer your question. In terms of what I am talking about though, where is the flaw in it?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 06:31 PM
1

If you're already in biomed research, then you should see that what I'm saying is true. Why are you so upset about what I'm talking about?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 06:28 PM
1

I answered your question. I'm not talking about weird fringe theories of physics. I am talking about already well substantiated theories of evolutionary biology.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 06:22 PM
1

About 51.530 Btu/h
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 06:17 PM
1

The purpose of your question is to make me waste time solving a heat equation for a system that is not related to what I'm talking about, despite the fact that I already proved the efficiency of the system that I am talking about. It's not in good faith. You're asking me to sit down and do math to prove something which isn't related to the claims I'm making just so that you can see if I understand thermodynamics. This in spite of the fact that I already provided proof for the claim that I am act…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 06:08 PM
1

What do you mean lol? Do you want me to sit down and do the math? Despite me already proving the efficiency with respect to the biology that I'm talking about? What you're saying makes no sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 06:06 PM
1

And I just answered it with respect to biological structures.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 06:01 PM
1

What is your question then? Biological cells self-replicate at the thermodynamic limit of heat dissipation and energy conservation. You can not even in principle design any set of self-replicating molecules which would replicate more efficiently than biological cells.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 05:55 PM
1

I can do you even better. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1209.1179.pdf
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 05:51 PM
1

I already did in the other comment which was deleted by the mod.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 05:47 PM
1

I just got my master's this past spring, my idea is not stupid just because you don't like it, and it's not fair for you to target me because of this. I promise I will not bring it up in other people's threads or conversations when it isn't appropriate. I should be allowed to bring it up in my own threads or comments, or in this general off-topic thread. I honestly think that this isn't fair and doesn't make sense with respect to the rules of this sub.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 05:46 PM
1

Thank you! My genius will be recognized very soon, and my vision WILL HAPPEN within the next few years.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 05:40 PM
1

I'm not insane. Everything I'm saying is derived from the natural world, I am very much scientifically grounded here.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 05:34 PM
1

I proved it already in another comment but the mod deleted it. I can prove it again if you want
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 05:34 PM
1

I post about how it will more efficient and better for humans to genetically engineer ourselves to make men small, and women large, and modify our brains so that the small men and large women fall in love more easily with each other. The women will be modified to have litters of babies each pregnancy (that's why they're large, as large women with strong bodies can support multiple-gestation more easily) and the men to be super-athletic, capable of running at high speeds, jumping high, being very…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 05:28 PM
1

Nothing I'm saying is schizo shit, it is all entirely derived from the principles of evolutionary biology, economics, and thermodynamics.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 05:27 PM
1

I'm genuinely not trying to be annoying here. I do not understand how what I'm talking about isn't appropriate in a subreddit dedicated to conversations about the relationships between men and women.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 05:20 PM
1

I don't think I'm allowed to sadly. My ideas are too powerful
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 05:16 PM
1

I'm not going to bring it up in other people's conversations in these threads, that would be annoying and inappropriate. Am I not allowed to make my own comment in this thread about it either? I'm asking because you did delete my post in yesterday's thread even though it was self-contained, and it seems to me as though this would be the actual thread where I can make those posts if I want, as much as I want (in terms of my own posts. If I were to just start spamming other people's comments and c…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 05:09 PM
1

Are we allowed to make any comment on this daily chat megathread that we want? Because I've been having a convo with one of the mods about what is appropriate in what context or thread. Are these daily megathreads sort of an "anything goes" situation?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 04:48 PM
1

Yes. I'm not going to try to get back with them.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 04:41 PM
1

The main principles are those of evolutionary biology and humanism. Also, I have a giantess fetish. A society where people all love each other, are very sexually attracted to each other, and produce large numbers of intelligent children at great rates is ideal. They will spread through the gene pool faster than other combinations, so they'll have the greatest fitness. Have you read through my other comments? I've explained things in them already. However, if you want me to, I will explain things…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 04:03 PM
1

Why do we want exponential growth of population in a world where you're worried about "efficiency"? I'm talking about the rate of growth because that is what determines which set of traits will become dominant in the genepool (fitness). Exponential growth doesn't contradict efficiency. Why couldn't we increse it with artificial wombs. Humans have a need to eat tasty food in order to get nutrients that their babies can use. The entire process of cooking this food and the supply chain of getting i…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 03:09 PM
1

It's going to happen
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 04:01 AM
–

I think I can convince enough people to make it happen.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 03:58 AM
–

What do you have questions about?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 03:48 AM
–

You're right about that. What is your opinion on it?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 03:47 AM
–

What is it that you would like to know? I can explain it for you and give references to claims I make.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 03:05 AM
3

I will certainly be around to see it. At 37, so will you (I'm in my late twenties for reference).
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 01:02 AM
–

The real redpill is that genemodding is right around the corner and is going to be used to make humans into a monogamous primate species where the females are far larger than the males.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 12:27 AM
1

You're going to like the future lol
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/23 11:55 PM
1

That isn't how I mean it but whatever. Your boyfriend should be careful about his spine if he's lifting heavy weights a lot for work
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/23 10:30 PM
15

A lot of the stuff that many of you talk about on this sub is so tedious and dumb.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/23 06:45 PM
1

The size difference is going to be much greater than that.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/23 06:13 PM
1

Why would we need shoe lifts?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/23 06:04 PM
1

Tall men and short women are going to have their germlines modified so that they only produce small sons and tall daughters. Eventually they will be modified (i.e. their somatic cells and such) so that they will morph into small men or large women (i.e. we will use more sophisticated somatic cell editing techniques, like more advanced dual AAVs or prime editing stuff to turn tall men into small men and turn small women into tall large ones). This is because small men and large women are biologic…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/23 05:45 PM
–

Have I been flagged or something? I'm honestly asking because I don't really use reddit that much and don't know how it works.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/23 05:37 PM
–

I am not trolling, I genuinely believe this and I am pursuing a Ph.D in the field because of this. Read through my other comments, I am being honest here. If you disagree with me that's fine, but I'd like to ask why? And please don't assume that people are trolling just because they have somewhat unconventional ideas (new ideas always start off as unconventional ones)
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/23 05:29 PM
1

What don't you get?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/23 05:27 PM
1

Genetic engineering is going to be applied to humans to make men small and super athletic, and women tall and super fecund. In this way we will have a population which uses fewer resources to support greater population sizes, which has exponential fertility rates even assuming only a single pregnancy per woman, and which has massive economic advantages due to the people being modified to be highly intelligent as well as more efficient. Small athletic men and large fecund women are more efficient…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/23 05:20 PM
1

Yes. You will be taller and men will be smaller.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/23 05:14 PM
1

What does that have to do with what I'm saying?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/23 05:08 PM
1

We're going to genetically modify humans to make men small and super athletic, and women tall and super fecund.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/23 05:05 PM
–

Women's sexually dimorphic nucleus is slightly less than half the size of men's. We will genetically modify women to increase the size of the nucleus as well as genetically modify people in general to pair bond more easily, and to modify men to be small and super athletic and women to be large and super fecund. We're going to do this in only a few years from now, like 2 years or even less.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/23 05:02 PM
1

There's only going to be short men and tall women in a few years
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/23 04:45 PM
2

Testosterone alone isn't enough, although it is one of the hormones to regulate (increase) in women. You can modify men to be small and also have large penises. The reason we will make men small and women large isn't to make women feel safer with men, although that is a nice benefit that will come from it. The reason is because it is MORE EFFICIENT to have small males who are fit and super athletic but resource inexpensive, and large fecund females who can make litters of babies each pregnancy. …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/23 04:29 PM
2

Nope. The women and men will be very attracted to each other; They will fall in love more easily and become aroused more easily than we do now, as they have been modified to have more active and larger brain structures that compel this behavior. It will also be the common/normal dimorphism in society so they will be socialized into it as well. The men will like being small and will like the tall voluptuous women, and the women will like being tall and voluptuous and will like the small men.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/23 07:27 PM
1

We'll be able to fix that in a few years though lol
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/23 05:49 PM
0

What shortcomings would those be?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/23 05:37 PM
2

It is not the case that historically speaking 40% of men reproduced. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2833377/
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/23 05:05 PM
1

I'm going to actualize this in the real world, not a novel.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/23 04:54 PM
1

Why would someone hate their dating prospects so much?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/23 04:52 PM
2

Some people having smaller groups of friends does not imply that men do not want women, and that this desire has a neuroendochronological basis which can not be influenced by culture or social structures.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/23 04:43 PM
4

I don't really understand the rest of the post to be honest. You will never be able to "teach men to be okay being alone". It doesn't work that way. Everything from our neuroendochronology forces men to want women, it is not something that can ever be socialized away and there is no possibility of teaching men to be okay being alone.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/23 04:35 PM
1

I have a master's degree in bioinformatics and I'm pursuing a doctorate in genetics
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/23 04:05 PM
9

I don't get this post
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/23 03:58 PM
1

I don't need to wish for it, this was my motivation for entering graduate school. What I want is how genetic engineering is going to be applied to humans in the near future (before the end of the decade). We modify human brains to increase pair-bonding behaviors by increasing the number and regulating the activity of oxytocin and vassopressin receptive neurons in the brain. The men and women will fall in love with each other even more easily than men and women do now. We reverse sexual size dimo…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/23 03:09 PM
2

The reddit bot gave us both the "zealousideal" name lol
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/23 02:34 PM
1

How about we do something that is far easier and genetically modify humans (including adult humans by modifying the neuron cells that regulate attraction and sexuality) to have greater sexual response cycles and pair bonding behavior. We are literally only about a year away from it at this point. We will just modify women to find more men attractive. This is entirely possible within somatic cell therapies, and just a few months ago, we hit a milestone in neuron cell modification where we were ab…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/23 02:31 PM
1

A 4'4" proportionate and highly athletic male has about ~half of the daily metabolic rate as an equally proportioned athletic 5'9" one, let alone one even taller than that. It is not insignificant, it is not "barely less resources". There is no set of tasks in the modern world that is needed to maintain and further industrial society that couldn't be performed by a society of tall women and small men. They will like each other and want to sleep together and form families and all that. When it's …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/23 11:19 PM
1

Artificial wombs are a constant rate. Superfecund women are exponential with the number of women. I've never understood artificial wombs, women already gestate fetuses highly efficiently in terms of energy and matter, pretty much at the thermodynamic limit already. Artificial wombs will use more energy and have a lower rate of growth. There are genes associated with menstraul pains and pregnancy sickness. So women can be modified to have reduced menstrual pains and stuff like that. In terms of e…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/23 11:17 PM
1

We don't need to be running out of resources, that isn't what my argument is. Given two nations that both produce x amount of produce/resources per unit time, the one with small men and large women will be able to support more people for the same amount of resources, and will expand exponentially faster even assuming only a single pregnancy per woman. It doesn't matter that "parents aren't going to want their sons to be shrunk". I am describing mass genetic modification of the entire population,…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/23 07:33 PM
1

I just wrote a post in a different thread that sums it up in outline: https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/15ftdrz/given_that_all_first_world_countries_will_soon/jugf9kj/?context=3 1) large females are physically able to support multiple-gestation while smaller ones can't. That is, tall thick women with big hips and strong legs have inherently greater fecundity, they can gestate multiple babies at once with greater ease, leading to exponential fertility rates EVEN ASSUMING ONLY A S…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/23 04:33 PM
0

We're just going to genetically modify humans to make men small and women tall in a few years
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/23 03:14 PM
1

I'm going to basically copy a post I made before for this one. In a few years, genetic modification is going to be used to optimize our bodies, making males small (think around 4'4") and lean athletic, and females large (think around 6'5") and thick and fecund. This is physically, economically, and biologically ideal, as they will use fewer resources to support larger population sizes, with exponentially greater fertility rates even assuming only a single pregnancy per woman, as women will be pr…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/23 08:04 AM
1

In the paleolithic and hunter gatherer societies, height is not important in the way you're making it out. Anyway it doesn't really matter. We're not in the paleolithic. For modern and future humans, small males and large females are more efficient and superior, and genetic modification will eventually inevitably be used to modify men to be small and women to be tall.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/23 07:51 AM
1

I'm having trouble getting to sleep right now but otherwise yea I'm pretty good
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/23 07:49 AM
1

That's the problem. Short men are superior by every important metric. We as a society and you as an individual need to come to terms with this because genetic modification actually IS going to be used to make men small. You can understand this right?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/23 04:26 PM
2

I'll be home this afternoon and I'll do it then. And yes, the "preference" for tall men is stupid and you do in fact need to get over it. Stop being defensive about this there is literally nothing wrong with short guys, stop pretending there is.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/23 03:54 PM
7

What do you mean "get over yourself"? What im saying is true.. I'm doing a Ph.D in genetics and bioinformatics, I just completed my "en route" masters. Genetic modification for humans is going to be used to optimize our bodies, making males small and athletic, and females large and fecund. This is physically, economically, and biological ideal, as they will use fewer resources to support larger population sizes, with exponentially greater fertility rates (even assuming only a single pregnancy pe…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/23 03:24 PM
5

Short men /small men are physically superior to tall ones. They are healthier and get all diseases and cancers at lower rates, they are superior in modern warfare and fights with weapons, they can perform all labor necessary and they require less food and energy to do so. Short small men are objectively physically superior to tall large men in both quality and quantity. Genetic engineering is going to be used in a few years to make all men small, not large. Women are the ones who are going to be…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/23 03:08 PM
1

dazzling bag fact air head bear cough steep wistful ludicrous This post was mass deleted and anonymized with Redact
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/23 01:39 AM
1

vegetable cable cagey heavy station worry special gaping fuel butter This post was mass deleted and anonymized with Redact
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/23 11:36 PM
1

caption childlike rain squealing sand hard-to-find psychotic quarrelsome expansion foolish This post was mass deleted and anonymized with Redact
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/23 10:56 PM
1

The statement "males are larger than females in the majority of mammals" means that out of all mammal species, over 50% have male-biased size dimorphism. This is not true, so the statement is false. When people say "males are larger than females for mammals" they're wrong. Bats and the various rodent species are mammals, so they are included in the statement. If you were to say "in the majority of primate species males are larger than females" then you'd be correct, or if you were to say "in the…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/23 08:33 PM
1

Size dimorphism is based on mass and body size. No matter how you cut it, males are not larger than females in the majority of mammals, which is all that I'm talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/23 08:18 PM
-1

The traits women tend to be attracted to in men are not genetically of higher quality. For example, tall height is actually a genetically inferior trait - taller men are less healthy, die earlier and get all diseases at greater rates, lose fights more often, and require more food.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/23 07:20 PM
1

44% are not male-biased, 34% are, which is one third. For primates as well, males are usually the same size as females, and not larger. Over one half of primates have same-sex size dimorphism. It is not a law nor general rule nor anything that states males are nor should be larger than females. It's the opposite across all lifeforms.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/23 07:08 PM
1

Holy shit. If less than one third of mammalian species have male-biased size dimorphism, then the statement "males are usually larger than females in mammals" is false. I have no idea why you're not understanding this. If something only happens one third of the time it's not the usual. For mammals, the usual is for males and females to be the same size. That's the typical dimorphism for mammals. In the majority of primates as well, males and females are about the same size. Why are you getting s…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/23 06:39 PM
1

The statement "males are usually larger than females" can be true only if over 50% of species have male-biased sexual size dimorphism. It is not the case that over 50% of species have male-biased sexual size dimorphism, therefore the statement is not true. This conversation isn't about humans, it's about mammals. I get annoyed when people spread the lie that male mammals are larger, or that mammals are an exception to the rule that females are larger than males in sexually reproducing species. I…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/23 05:52 PM
1

No it includes both mass as well as volume. It's not a "dumb model" at all, it's just an accurate measurement of the average mass and body size of mammals. This isn't about models we're just measuring the average size and weight of the species. There is no reason not to include rodents and bats, they are mammals, and it isn't just rodents and bats where females are the same size or larger. Whales, rabbits, some hyenas, many primates and monkeys, etc. the females are the same size or larger. I ha…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/23 04:55 PM
1

My statement is "females are as large or larger in the majority of mammals", which is true, and is true across almost all species and all classes. Males are not larger than females in the majority of mammalian species. Honestly I don't get why this causes people to freak out so much. It's the universal trend in biology/evolution of sexually reproducing species that males become small and females become large.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/23 04:47 PM
1

This is simply a denial of the reality of the situation. No dude, male mammals are not larger than female mammals in the majority of mammal species. Females are as large or larger than males in most mammals, just like they are across all animal classes. Even across primates, females are as large as males in many species.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/23 04:28 PM
1

Females are larger than males in 22% of mammals, and as large as males in 34% of mammal species. https://www.newscientist.com/article/2363067-females-are-not-smaller-than-males-in-most-mammal-species/ Females are as large or larger than males in the majority of mammals
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/23 03:42 PM
5

frightening hat waiting badge combative aspiring insurance violet sleep worm This post was mass deleted and anonymized with Redact
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/23 03:37 PM
2

money ten lush lip ludicrous water disarm sharp scarce offend This post was mass deleted and anonymized with Redact
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/23 03:20 PM
1

Females are larger than males in almost 90% of sexually dimorphic animal species. Males are larger than females in less than 2% of species. Sexual dimorphism almost always makes females as large as possible and males as small as possible. This is due to fecundity selection, which is the main selection mechanism acting on the female of the species. Larger females can produce more eggs or gestate more offspring during pregnancy, making larger females more fit than smaller ones. Size however does n…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/23 08:15 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter