TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Zeddikus Archive

View 6 posts and 893 comments by Zeddikus on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

I misread as taze of justice. When I saw the kick, I was like "damn, she gonna get tazed too!!?"
/r/PussyPassDenied16/08/16 04:24 AM
19

You are right, it is rated fresh. However, if you read the high score reviews by critics, they use words like mediocre in the written reviews and then give it a score of 80. For some reason, when I think of a score like 80, the word mediocre should never be in the accompanying review... unless you mean the reviews that start out Sexist, misogynistic, virgin basement dwellers who live with their mom are idiots, fart from the front jokes are amazing and really pushing comedy boundaries. I mean, if…
/r/PussyPassDenied02/08/16 07:57 AM
8

It doesn't sound like you have learned it yet. The age of consent in Ohio, is 16. This means anyone who is not in a position of authority could legally have sex with a 16 year old or older. What there are, are exceptions to having sex with an under 16 year old if you are 18 or under. The age of consent in Ohio is 16 as specified by Section 2907.04 of the Ohio Revised Code. However, there exists a close-in-age exception where a minor 13 or older can consent to sex as long as their partner is less…
/r/PussyPass09/07/16 01:38 AM
31

The facts are, she harrassed this guy for weeks, one night when he had had a few, he figured why not... they had the anal sex, he never contacted her again because she was insane, she accused him of rape, police didn't believe her, even the schools kangaroo court designed to find for the victim even with the flimsiest of evidence didn't believe her, she started carrying her rape mattress to class, the typical redhair radfems pitched a fit, the salons of the world white knighted her, blatant evid…
/r/PussyPassDenied29/06/16 05:39 AM
2

That explains why people go on them, even when they know they have no case, they get paid AND they get to be on TV. And they get a couple of nights in whatever city the show is hosted out of with top notch accommodations and flight to and fro in business class. So basically, it is an all expense 2 day get away, with travel, luxury accommodations, spending money, plus they get paid or double paid for spending a few hours on set and get to be on an episode of something their grandma can most likel…
/r/PussyPassDenied10/06/16 02:29 AM
32

It is because deep down, those women see themselves as children. Not really responsible for their actions, because vagina. Not all women think this, mind you, but the other women (besides whoopi) on that panel... they don't believe they should face the consequences anyone else who throws the first punch does.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/03/16 07:02 AM
25

if you gave them time, and could control them like a robot, you could take down a house using their neck http://static4.businessinsider.com/~~/f?id=50ec86c069bedd5d3d00000b
/r/PussyPassDenied17/03/16 05:42 AM
38

Umm, statutory rape makes sense when the person you don't want your child associating with is, you know, an actual adult... but, both the parents and solicitor should have suits filed against them for using this against someone who is not an adult.
/r/PussyPass05/03/16 08:54 PM
4

after that it was discussed that men have better reaction times. I wouldn't think reaction times played much into it, but tactical thinking brains vs less tactical thinking brains.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/02/16 12:56 AM
5

I would guess that men are faster with the sweeper, and as such, are able to melt more ice with it, which gives them superior control.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/02/16 12:54 AM
58

Sorry to break this to you, but you should be happy. You see every vagina is a gift, and if a vagina just happens to find itself enveloping your penis without your permission, you should feel happy, not taken advantage of or raped. You see, there are no undesirable vagina's, only misogynistic penises that don't know their place.
/r/PussyPass17/02/16 08:52 PM
2

I wouldn't hold my breath. The Crown prosecuted him criminally, not based on lies, like one would find in a false rape case, but because the prosecutors also believed he had violated the law. While what happened to him sucks, and he certainly should (in a just world) be able to recoup at least his defense costs, this was a criminal matter, not a civil one. If he were able to sue anyone, it would be the crown for prosecuting him unjustly, and the crown is for all intents and purposes shielded fro…
/r/PussyPassDenied23/01/16 01:08 AM
-1

Do you have a penis? I do. If someone bit mine off, I sm pretty sure I wouldn't be very mobile, would you?
/r/PussyPass18/12/15 10:21 AM
-4

Do you think the number of rapes would dramatically decrease if vagina's had teeth? I do. Can you guess why I think that?
/r/PussyPass18/12/15 10:15 AM
-11

You are confusing coerced with forced. Coercion means on some level you agree to take part. And that is where you are wrong. If you bite off the offenders dick, they won't be in much shape to do anything about it. The threat of force might persuade you to take part, but it isn't force that has accomplished it, it is the fear of it.
/r/PussyPass18/12/15 09:49 AM
-10

Unless they have a gun to your head or there are multiple people, or it is a case where it is a child or something crazy like that, you bite down and they are debilitated. So no, just no, in 99% of the cases you can't be forced, and this case falls well into the 99%. You can be coerced to give a blowjob, not forced. You can be forcibly raped... but a blowjob requires action on the part of the giver, and refusal to bite down. If vagina's had teeth, there wouldn't be forcible rapes either.
/r/PussyPass18/12/15 09:28 AM
6

I read it multiple times and there is no context to even remotely imply he is asleep or unconscious, at least while the act is taking place. Multiple times it says he was blacked out. Not asleep, not pass out, not unconscious... always blacked out. So I think he takes issue with your incorrect title. Between you and the article, you used passed out, not the article. The whole point they convicted him on was because he had no recollection they had to concede at least 50.01% likelihood in her favo…
/r/PussyPass18/12/15 08:17 AM
18

Here is the thing about blowjobs, and solid proof no one on that student council has ever given or received one. If you withdraw your consent halfway through it, they can't make you continue and even more, you have a mouthful of defense if they tried. I hope he sues, and they have to pay like crazy.
/r/PussyPass18/12/15 05:25 AM
-4

looks like a cop was copping a feel at 3:33
/r/PussyPassDenied12/12/15 08:29 AM
2

I can certainly see it happening, just that it is rare. I have stumbled here and there getting down from a jacked up pick up, where my shoe caught weirdly on the step rail... That said, that she broke her foot is surprising... a twisted ankle seems much more likely. Had it happened to anyone else, other than razzing by anyone who saw it happen for the rest of their careers, not much would be thought about it. But then again, anyone else wouldn't have failed multiple qualifications, only to be pa…
/r/PussyPass27/11/15 08:04 PM
1

Wow, talk about victim blaming, the UK justice system is fucked.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/11/15 06:23 AM
23

Women's tennis is popular, but I firmly believe that on her best day, Serena Williams couldn't beat a top 200 men's player. To think their is parity is obnoxious. The men are stronger, faster and quicker. They serve 20 mph faster, hit harder and are more conditioned because they play 5 sets instead of 3. There is no parity other than in popularity.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/10/15 12:14 AM
0

Which has what to do with identifying a bad situation and avoiding it exactly? You can hem and haw over the semantics or who might or could be to blame, i am dropping sage advice that can prevent guys from experiencing this guys last few years of fun.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/10/15 10:12 PM
22

Note to every guy here. If you follow a girl into a bathroom where she is sick from too much to drink and then coax her back to your room to have sex, don't be surprised when you find a shitstorm in your life afterwards. I don't think it is wrong to tell women it is a bad idea to walk down a dark alley late at night, just as I don't think it is wrong to tell guys not to try and fuck a girl who has drank so much she is sick from it. Neither situation is a good one, and shit can go very badly if c…
/r/PussyPassDenied13/10/15 04:12 PM
2

You know, the chuckle their parents got probably wasn't worth the next six weeks of the kids sleeping in the parents bed out of fear.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/09/15 08:31 AM
2

but I guarantee that there are more people that want videos of a girls soccer game for creepy purposes than there are that want it for non-creepy purposes. No, no you can't. lol
/r/PussyPass12/09/15 10:42 PM
3

Is it really creepy, though? I mean, it isn't inherently creepy at all. Whether it is a little girl, college girl, little boy, college male and all ages inbetween, aerial shots of sporting events are cool. There is a reason all the stadium and professional games give aerial shots when possible on TV. So, someone is getting cool sport action shots of your whoever... where else is a person supposed to get a shot like that? It is the safest time in ever. Don't see things that aren't creepy as creep…
/r/PussyPass12/09/15 07:25 AM
9

Equality would be men having the right to bow out of being a parent or the financial responsibility of a child they do not want during the early part of a pregnancy, just as women can. Feminism is women choosing for men whether they will be a parent or have financial responsibility for a child.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/08/15 08:43 AM
2

But really only in a civil way. Sexual harassment can get a boss sued into oblivion, but won't land him in prison.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/07/15 06:34 PM
1

lol, sometimes gender rolls can be cool. Like, I have to mow the grass in the hot texas sun, and take care of the yard...in trade, my woman does all my laundry!
/r/PussyPassDenied24/06/15 07:27 AM
8

How can anyone be dumb enough to still get crazy ass sms bills when every carrier has an unlimited plan?
/r/PussyPass05/06/15 01:29 AM
8

It crosses the line when violence is actually incited and when a reasonable person could be led to commit violence because of what they say. These people are preaching lunacy...there is a difference.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/05/15 10:30 PM
2

Not really. They are no more allowed to trample on your rights than any other LEO. The border (and within 100 miles of it) itself is given a special exemption to allow for stops/checkpoints without cause, and they can ask for identity (at the border to enter) but beyond that, they legally held to the same standards as far as citizens rights. They still require RAS, and nervousness has been held to not alone be cause for detention.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/05/15 01:02 AM
19

Funny thing is, the largest voting bloc in the US is women. The reason we have yet to have a female president, is WOMEN don't vote for them in high enough numbers.
/r/PussyPass18/04/15 06:37 AM
4

The only places where you have an expectation of privacy is a lawyers office, a doctors office, a locker room, your own home or a bathroom. If you are not in one of these places, odds are, you can be filmed/photographed and there is nothing you can do about it.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/04/15 08:02 PM
16

The only time I ever see women "beaten" there is when they started the fight... you know, like uppercut bus, or the 3 women beat up by the guy on the subway they attacked, or girls in school attacking boys, you know things that scream pussy pass denied. Mostly though, it is court cases like you see crowding the front page today.
/r/PussyPass20/03/15 08:48 PM
36

She has a long history of being a feminist. She has been published in such super conservative places as The New York Times, Huffington Post, Slate, The Atlantic, is a former philosophy professor of ethics, and is an equity feminist not a gender/victim feminist. She is about equality, not victim status, and readily admits unlike 2nd and 3rd wave feminists that men face hardships too, and modern feminism is about raising women by demonizing normal male behavior. The National Women's Political Cauc…
/r/PussyPass17/03/15 05:04 AM
-1

Her/his son was 16 at the time. From what I have seen, he never contributed another dime to his son's upbringing before he was 21. I can be ok with this, if all she gets is back pay for what he should have contributed for his son those 5 years. So, maybe 30-50k. That said, I would prefer he just paid back the government for that period, as they gave her the money he couldn't at the time.
/r/PussyPass12/03/15 02:34 AM
21

She is a walking trope who relied on a trope to gain everyone's sympathy. That comes into play when the subject is tropes.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/02/15 05:55 AM
23

That is something that always amused me about Sarkessian being taken seriously by anyone. "You mean to tell me you actually care what a girl who applies her makeup with a puddy knife and wears giant hoop earrings only popular with tweens and those who thought the Jersey Shore was a good show... you care what she thinks about videogames?
/r/PussyPassDenied19/02/15 02:26 AM
7

Or 17 or 16 which is the age of consent in most of the US. I think in most of these cases it isn't so much about consent, but civic trust. These children are required to attend school, and these teachers are expected not to have sexual relationships with their students. Thus, even though in most cases it is not rape, it is inappropriate. Now, if male teachers having sex with students past the age of consent are getting far more severe punishments, then this is a PP. Thing is, I don't know if sla…
/r/PussyPass17/01/15 01:27 AM
6

Lol It would totally be legal for them to have you sit on a vibrator just as these women are doing. It would be just as illegal for a guy to give a girl a handjob over the pants as it would be for a woman to do it to a man. Sorry your tiny mind cannot understand a handjob is not the same as sitting on something vibrating. Thus, I wish you the best of luck with that prostitute.
/r/PussyPass13/01/15 12:01 AM
18

It is not either of those devices, and trying equate either of those as comparable to what is in the video is absurd. Those devices are comparable to a dildo for a woman, and I am pretty fucking sure the cops would have arrested any of those women if they had seen them cramming a dildo in their crotch. Pussy pass is a woman performing an action a man is not allowed to/acting aggressive and then thinking her gender is a shield against reprisal or getting lesser punishment or no punishment at all …
/r/PussyPass12/01/15 11:51 PM
24

This is not an example of pussy pass. I highly doubt that the police would have done anything if there had been a dude sitting on that same device. That the guy would be highly unlikely to climax from it is irrelevant. Are girls who get off riding a Harley Davidson getting a pussy pass since they are all not shamed or arrested on site? No. Same thing here. Had a guy sat on that same machine, no one would have given a fuck... and for that reason, this ain't no pp.
/r/PussyPass12/01/15 11:17 PM
1

Lol, she can have it or not, she can adopt it out, or not, she can abort it or not... he has to just agree to whatever she chooses. Lets have fun and switch this around. He can force her to have it or not. He can force her to abort it. He can force her to adopt it out or not. One of these things would make ilk like you scream like a banshee, the other completely benefits you and you are ok with. Strange that.
/r/MensRights20/12/14 05:34 AM
1

Yeah, unlike women, men should be held accountable for sex. Gotcha.
/r/MensRights20/12/14 05:22 AM
1

No, what it does is create a situation where pregnancies are planned beforehand by both participants, where neither the man or the woman chooses anything for the other. Women should not choose for a man anymore than a man should choose for a woman. Unplanned pregnancies are just that, unplanned. Neither participant should be held accountable for something unplanned, however, men are, where women are not. Feminists and women always scream equality, and this is a blatant example where equality is …
/r/MensRights20/12/14 04:57 AM
1

So, then, you believe it is a woman's right to choose for the male if he will be a parent. Women don't believe men should force them to be a parent, men should have the same right. In a world where women can choose to abort, men should also have the same right to abort their parenthood. The woman could then decide to have the child, knowing she would then be fully responsible, abort it or give it up for adoption. Sex is not an 18 year sentence for women, it shouldn't be for men either.
/r/MensRights20/12/14 03:13 AM
4

Immediately uploads to your youtube channel. Video quality is decent, as long as you have a strong 4g.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/12/14 03:54 AM
-8

You only have to crack your window, and you are allowed to know the reason you were stopped/what cause they have to suspect you are a threat and in need to exit the vehicle.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/12/14 03:47 AM
9

Easy fix. Cellphone+Bambuser
/r/PussyPassDenied18/12/14 03:43 AM
3

A lot of people don't understand that by releasing the person accused name, you are actually protecting them. It may seem insane, but, people could be disappeared (and were in the past) otherwise. While it sucks to ones character to have it known that they were accused of whatever crime, knowing they are in the clink, allows their families/loved ones know where they are, what they are charged with, and what is necessary to get them representation if they have the means. It allows reporters to se…
/r/MensRights10/12/14 06:54 AM
5

The source of the story is sketchy as fuck, so who knows the real situation, that said, unless it is done through the courts, you cannot 'abandon' your child, at least financially, if he had financial means, and never paid them, she or the state is owed that money.
/r/PussyPass09/12/14 06:51 AM
-4

This is a tough one for me. On the one hand, it has been a long time, on the other hand, if his kids were under age and he never contributed, then he owes her at least back child support (though it shouldn't be 2mil)...and he is an ass who abandoned his children.
/r/PussyPass09/12/14 06:41 AM
5

I think he tried when he said something to the effect of "you can't make someone else happy, you can only make yourself happy and if women are not happy, it is their own fault".
/r/PussyPassDenied06/12/14 11:30 PM
1

That is not really it, though. Which is exactly why these feminists want kangaroo courts at colleges, because the difference between the police and those courts, is the police actually investigate. You 'could' get arrested, but if there is no evidence, the police will stop pursuing it, which just destroys regret=rape situations. It still doesn't stop the stigma from the accusation, but just the accusation without police involvement can be almost as devastating, especially in a college setting.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/12/14 11:12 PM
1

Pretty good article if you look past the conservative vs liberal slant. She explains much of the problem with the new campus sex rules and even uses an example we here (occidental college) bring up.
/r/MensRights30/11/14 07:17 PM
24

I don't know that this is pussy pass. I know of guys who have not lost their license after getting caught going 110mph which is close to the same speed.
/r/PussyPass10/10/14 12:07 AM
1

It comes down to boobs sell. Women often whine about sexualization, but happily walk around with boobs bracelets. That, and women stick together and pester the people who make decisions. Men are far less likely to stick to a herd mentality on things like health.
/r/MensRights02/10/14 06:42 AM
1

I am pretty sure the state he lives in sentences 1st time dv defendants to exactly what he plead down to anyways. Basically, the prosecutor gets exactly the same thing without the trial saving the costs of a trial. Maybe they were less than confident on the conviction, but most likely they were happy to get the same results without the costs.
/r/MensRights24/09/14 05:12 AM
8

You mean she should not be held accountable for initiating the assault, assaulting him multiple times, and charging him in a threatening manner? You are one of those people who think women are little children, and should not be held accountable for their actions, aren't you? She is an adult, initiated assault, and if she were switched out with a he, no charges ever would have been brought. I think that is the definition of this subreddit. Are you sure you are in the right place?
/r/PussyPass24/09/14 04:59 AM
3

What about it?
/r/PussyPass24/09/14 04:49 AM
1

There is no trial, he pleaded out. I really have no problem with Rice getting in trouble, both from his team and the nfl, which are both private entities and welcome to do as they wish. I just think his now wife also should have had her charges stick and be forced to attend the same anger management sessions he is now required to. And if her work (if she works, being that she is married to him, I doubt it though) feel fit to punish her, that is up to them. It isn't that Rice is in trouble that b…
/r/PussyPass24/09/14 12:31 AM
0

The difference between Ray Rice and Peterson is, there was video of Ray Rice. Thing is, Ray Rice and his soon to be wife were both drunk, abusing each other and adults. Peterson beat the hell out of a 4 year old. Ray Rice punched someone who was charging him like a 4 year old, but was an adult and had agency and responsibility for their actions.
/r/MensRights16/09/14 05:19 AM
4

IIRC, when I was in the KIA sub, I saw that now the police department is saying that while they never received a call, they are aware that the FBI is investigating/handling it. That said, I wouldn't say that I contacted the police if I called the feds.
/r/MensRights14/09/14 08:16 PM
0

Except there is nothing about spitting in the report. You 'think' he spit on her. Since there has never been mention of spitting, and there is no clear evidence in the video he spit on her (he could have just as easily blew on her, which makes sense since spitting was not in the report). If that is the case, and the initial report of her admitting she started the physical altercation (and spitting is considered physical assault), there is no doubt in my mind if she were a man either nothing at a…
/r/MensRights09/09/14 03:53 AM
1

The initial reports from the statements, said nothing about spitting. Based on those reports, they arrested both of them, and from what I remember she admitted to starting it (which, consequently, is why Whoopi Goldberg made the statements she did about the situation). If there was no spitting, and he was just smarting off to her both times instead, it changes everything about this scenario. Either she is an adult, and as such, equally responsible for her actions, or she is a child because she i…
/r/MensRights09/09/14 03:25 AM
1

women are not half of "Core" gaming. They are half of MMO's. Core gaming comprises Simulation, FPS,RTS,RPG's and MMO's... women are at best 10-20% of the first 3, 20-30% of RPG's and close to half of MMO's.
/r/MensRights07/09/14 07:40 AM
5

Great idea, raid the place that is known for producing the top raids on the planet. This doesn't sound like it will backfire at all. Nope.
/r/MensRights07/09/14 07:13 AM
1

Sure, to an extent. It is one thing when a single event effects 10 high school students (though, to be fair, some states have reduced the penalties and most other will too in the future) it is quite another when it touches a person every 50 feet all throughout the country. The first pisses off a small number of people, the other brings down the wrath of the entire country all at once. I am not condoning either action, just explaining the logic used... it is cost analysis. And tens of millions al…
/r/PussyPass07/09/14 04:22 AM
3

Yeah, sure she was, but if they prosecuted her, they would, to the letter of the law, have to prosecute all the actors, directors, producers and photographers and then all the unfortunate souls who bought it. Such a witch hunt would have soured the public. Just like such a witch hunt would sour the public today. Which is why, other than the leakers themselves, no one will get in trouble for this situation.
/r/PussyPass07/09/14 04:11 AM
6

I think there is no way it happens. It will be like the case of Traci Lords, a porn star from the 80's who made a ton of porn videos, with many, many different partners, and was extremely popular, and thus millions of the tapes were sold before it was discovered she was only sixteen when she filmed most of them. Basically, it came down to either the FBI/whoever had to arrest and prosecute millions, or no one... and that would be the same case here, except I would guess in the US/Canada/Britain o…
/r/PussyPass06/09/14 10:58 PM
3

Texas doesn't use electric chairs, ahem, and we ain't sharing our drug cocktail recipe with no one.
/r/PussyPass21/08/14 02:30 AM
0

Jury nullification as a concept sounds great, but in practice it is exceedingly rare. Thing is, it didn't used to be, at the start of the 1900's., or near to, Judges went from actively notifying juries of not only their ability, but their duty to nullify laws they found oppressive. Today, not only is it an immediate dismissal if you let on you are aware of and believe in jury nullification, but the only way one can get a case/law nullified is if there is absolute unity on the decision without a …
/r/PussyPass21/08/14 01:38 AM
8

Definitely attempted pussy pass, though.
/r/PussyPass21/08/14 12:58 AM
33

I think the most important thing to take from this article is to record video (without sound) every sexual encounter you have in college. I imagine the rap for the possible illegal videotaping is less damaging than a rape judgement against you. So glad I am old and college was decades ago.
/r/MensRights14/08/14 04:01 AM
4

The market acts on what within (and without) the rules makes the most money as fast as possible. It is a different way of saying if women could be hired at a lower cost and produce just as much as the men they replaced not a man alive would have a job.
/r/MensRights14/08/14 03:37 AM
12

The problem is with the title of the article, and moreover, that everyone who hears what the actual study says "1 in 5 women have been sexually assaulted" automatically assume that "assault" = "rape". If one in five women who went to college were raped, no one would send their daughters to college. What is more troubling, is what accounts for assault. By their watered down versions of sexual assault, every single person on the planet has been sexually assaulted. Titty twisters, cock checks, pats…
/r/MensRights14/08/14 02:26 AM
5

No, they don't care about you because you don't know any better. Do I really care about 80 year old men who won't be here for much longer being properly educated about global warming? No, I don't because in the grand scheme of things, they don't matter... their minds are made up, and for the most part they have always lived in a world where energy and the use of resources was deemed limitless. The youth, though. The future... you can be damn sure that I do care they are educated properly on the …
/r/MensRights14/08/14 02:03 AM
2

"It is like McCarthyism if you don't say exactly what a particular group wants you to say...they are acting like little children". Yeah, it is exactly like McCarthyism. They don't want your voice to be heard because having an adult conversation on the subject precludes women from being treated like a 2 year old throwing a tantrum. Feminists believe that women can never be at fault. I just know that if I assault a 6'4 250 pound guy and he beats the shit out of me, no one feels sorry for me. Every…
/r/MensRights06/08/14 11:34 PM
3

Not to mention, Texas has a really good reparations law. He gets $80k for every year he was in prison and $80k for each year the rest of his life. This money will never make up for the life that was stolen from him, nor the shame he faced and trust he lost through no fault of his own. He is the first exoneree who did not request the dna testing. It was, as you say, done because the DA is checking all previous murder and rape cases that resulted in conviction. Being from Dallas, I respect Watkins…
/r/MensRights26/07/14 07:57 AM
1

I think that poster was doing the opposite of what you were saying. Basically, evil bastards have some good qualities and good people who contribute a lot have some bad qualities. Yin and yang
/r/MensRights21/07/14 04:47 AM
1

If anything, I would think, like all the hard sciences, they are not very feminist at all. Feminism relies on the feels, Physicists rely on mathematics.
/r/MensRights21/07/14 04:43 AM
3

Where is this thread. There must be a snapshot somewhere!
/r/MensRights21/07/14 04:30 AM
12

I have seen estimates that it today, costs ~250k to raise a child to the age of 21 providing them all the necessities, from education to healthcare. This guy has kids that are now 28 and 27. He can show that since 1994 (when they were 7 and 8) he has paid 241k in child support. His ex is having him extradited over less than 2k, to which he faces 1 year in jail on contempt and claiming that he owes more than 1million in back child support. Something smells really fishy, and the commonwealth of vi…
/r/MensRights21/07/14 04:21 AM
2

You do understand that a grand jury just declined to charge him with criminal assault, right? The only way they could do that is to find he acted in self defense. Thus, I am going to go with the people who were just in a court of law, receiving instructions from a judge, than you. I am just weird like that.
/r/MensRights17/07/14 06:24 PM
2

I think there is a 3 second window for self defense. She threw the punch, backed up, all the while he continued following her and threw his abt 3 secs after she did. Self defense window imo.
/r/MensRights17/07/14 05:57 PM
7

Caught on video and the Grand Jury that failed to indict him all signing a letter saying he should be reinstated. That is the craziest part of this story to me. The grand jury they brought about to judge whether his case deserved to be criminally prosecuted felt so strongly about what they saw that they all signed a letter imploring the university to reverse their decision. Astonishing.
/r/MensRights17/07/14 05:27 AM
9

Thing is, had she really had a total of 5 beers the last one 3 hours before getting in the car, she would have been ok to drive. Shame she didn't follow her own lie.
/r/PussyPass17/07/14 01:20 AM
12

I think we are all aware what it is this gives women no expectation there will be consequences for their aggression. However, this, belatedly, is the correct punishment. I just wish it had been doled out from the get go without the university releasing a statement saying they were against violence against women. They should be against violence. That is good enough.
/r/MensRights17/07/14 12:24 AM
15

TL:DR Grand Jury refused to indict him on aggravated assault after video surveillance of the incident proved the female basketball player initiated the fight and he was defending himself. I'd imagine such a ruling forced TT's hand to apply the same rationale in applying an equal punishment to them both, instead of dismissing him from the team and only slapping her wrist with a suspension. Link to the video. She totally punched him. http://www.dallasnews.com/sports/college-sports/texas-tech-red-r…
/r/MensRights16/07/14 11:53 PM
-4

That is not even in the same ballpark. It is more akin to a 14 year old having her touch his pects or him touching her chest, neither of which would qualify as molestation. Anatomy above the belt is not the same as anatomy below it. Police never should have been involved in this case, or the opposite gender example. This is part of what is wrong in our society today. We have criminalized everything.
/r/MensRights09/07/14 03:35 AM
24

Am I the only one who thinks in cases of willing participants when they are minors that things that only involve anatomy above the belt should never be something where the police need to be involved? It seems to me this was a case where the parents of those involved should have talked it over and dealt out the appropriate punishment and such. While what the babysitter did was wrong, in my mind at least, it wasn't criminally wrong.
/r/MensRights08/07/14 11:27 PM
5

Why must the pay gap between Humanities and STEM fields equalize? Why is there any need? Women have the option to enter a higher paying field such as computer science and men have the option to enter a lower paying field such as teaching. Some women go into STEM and some Men go into teaching already, knowing full well the salary disparities. It is not that these fields pay less because women enter them, they don't. They have always paid less, long before women ever entered the workforce. It just…
/r/MensRights27/06/14 04:26 AM
1

Because men do get put on the child's birth certificate when they are not in a gay marriage in the state of Texas. They are being excluded (at least the DNA parent) not because they are male, but because the judge is homophobic.
/r/MensRights20/06/14 04:32 AM
1

I wonder, though, in a case where neither of the 2 lesbian women carried the child, but instead used a surrogate to birth one of each of their eggs, how it would play out. My guess is, it would play out the same way. The surrogate would be listed as the mother while neither of the DNA parents would be. You are looking (or whoever above) as if the lesbian couple would not use a surrogate, when the truth is they could. For that reason, I too, would classify this more a case of homophobia than a ma…
/r/MensRights20/06/14 04:26 AM
4

It is a good thing you don't believe people have the ability to control themselves and are just poor, little victims who cannot be held responsible for their choices. Why are you in this sub again? This is a sub for people who accept personal responsibility over victimization. Go to SRS, they will accept your inability to discern the meaning of moderation.
/r/MensRights20/06/14 02:37 AM
4

Why do people climb mountains, or parachute, or get into a car, or cross the effing street? All are dangerous. Drinking alcohol is not a problem, as long as it is done in moderation. Everything good about life, can be overdone to the point where it ruins your life. Don't believe me? Drink a gallon of water in 5 minutes and see what happens.
/r/MensRights20/06/14 01:51 AM
1

The comment section on the WaPost Will article has been so brigaded. Will basically says the government manipulates the numbers, and that the criminal justice system should be the arbiter of who is guilty of rape, not school administrators and that rape should be rigidly defined instead of vaguely defined and the femosphere is accusing him of rape apology on all sides. It is humorous how little logic feminists have. No wonder they suck in the stem fields.
/r/MensRights20/06/14 01:39 AM
1

Catholicism says the pope is christs representative on earth, and he speaks infallibly through"ex cathedra. You can't willy nilly separate that and be catholic. You can be a christian and do that, and believe that only Peter's word was infallible, but not a catholic.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 07:00 AM
6

I think we all know why. Can't have the single greatest moment in all of reddit gold going to a poster commenting on MRA issues in a positive light while simultaneously trouncing the anti-mra ilk.
/r/MensRights08/06/14 08:31 AM
-2

To be fair, that 250k is total cost, not cost to the parent. Don't get me wrong, the number is still huge to the parent, but society as a whole pays for the child's schooling. When you account for facilities, books, salaries for all the educators, it increases the cost of raising a child considerably. Parents still pay a shitload, but it is nowhere near 250k. Maybe 100k from birth to 18.
/r/MensRights08/06/14 08:24 AM
3

He is a recurring bit part, and hated by the shows main character, Sheldon.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 04:36 AM
14

Yeah, you can see what a utopia is to the feminists in all the feminist subs: Bans and deleted posts. Here, we let logic prevail, but we also let you have your say.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 04:32 AM
3

Have you tried any online pay find people sites? Shot in the dark that she filled in a questionnaire or got a credit card/phone or has mail delivered to her somewhere.
/r/MensRights15/05/14 11:41 PM
3

The comment section there is a rare breath of fresh air. Though I suppose some of us might have infiltrated it. Even so, there are plenty of supportive and questioning comments well before it was posted here. Question, isn't the wording of Title IX meant to protect the minority gender at the university? Seeing that men are by far the minority gender in US colleges, in most cases, couldn't men use TitleIX against these courts since students make up a large portion of these tribunals, and since th…
/r/MensRights06/05/14 08:10 AM
1

Parking tickets only exist for things that have been passed through legislation. There are certain things that can get you a ticket/clamped even in a private parking lot... such as handicapped space or parking in the fire lane or in front of a hydrant. Mom spot, however, is not commissioned through legislation, it is merely a suggestion from the store. As others have said, they could possibly have you towed to another spot at their own expense, but they could not clamp or ticket you for it. It i…
/r/MensRights06/05/14 07:47 AM
31

I am sorry. I don't believe it is radfem at all to give pertinent information to all fathers and let them decide to do with it what they will. In almost all cases, paternity only matters for a very limited time. If after that time the wife/girlfriend reveals that she cheated on him and the child is not his, he is still financially responsible for offspring that is not his. Women are assured as to their paternity to the child, men should be just as certain. We have the technology, and the costs a…
/r/MensRights30/04/14 06:22 AM
2

The numbers I have seen from marketing peeps at AAA developers say that females represent between 10-20% of core gaming, and that being RTS, FPS and RPG's. MMO's ~ 40% and casual games, somewhere around 80%.
/r/MensRights29/04/14 02:05 AM
2

His gender won't be invoked because he wouldn't be offended if it were. Women's gender is brought up because it does affect their psyche. Just as terms like "Pussy, wuss, wimp, and sissy" affect men. Bullies use language that works. Calling a female a wuss or wimp doesn't get under her skin the same way as "get back in the kitchen and make me a sammich". Bullies know what works and what doesn't.
/r/MensRights29/04/14 02:02 AM
18

LOL. Women always say they want to be treated the same as a man. Such a lie. Internet bullies use what is effective. The reason women's sex is brought into the e-bullying is because women can't handle that type of trash talk. It is their kryptonite. It really gets under their skin. So much so, they inundate the web with blog posts crying about it. Those same internet bullies call guys "pussies, fags, pantywaists" because, shocker, those are the things that get under guys skin. You don't see the …
/r/MensRights28/04/14 11:25 PM
57

Equality hurts.
/r/MensRights25/04/14 01:21 AM
1

Male and female genitals are formed by the same beginning tissue in utero, they are comprised of very different tissue as they become male and female genitalia. The mucous membranes that make women wet do so by taking plasma out of the blood and secreting it into the vagina. If a woman is conscious while being raped, she is thinking to herself she is about to be raped. The body protects itself just as your mouth releases a lot of saliva when you know you are about to bite something sour. If she …
/r/MensRights21/04/14 04:45 AM
1

A woman gets wet to protect herself from injury during sex. If she is turned on, and into it, she will be more wet, but much like your mouth waters in anticipation of food you are biting into or about to, a woman's vagina lubricates itself as necessary.
/r/MensRights21/04/14 03:46 AM
3

guess what, women who are raped get wet. An erection in a male and wetness in a woman have to do your bodies reaction to stimulation far more than how into it you are. If you are tied up and some girl starts sucking your dick, you will get hard, no matter how not turned on by her you are.
/r/MensRights21/04/14 03:43 AM
5

Anyone can sue anyone, but that doesn't mean it won't be laughed out of court. If a woman can abort a child without notifying her husband without there being repercussions to the doctor who performed it, a man or woman can be fixed without their being repercussions. Medical history and decisions are legally between the patient (of age) and the doctor. No one else has any legal say, unless the patient is incapacitated. What the wife has is a right to a divorce if she so chooses, and nothing else.
/r/MensRights16/04/14 04:48 AM
11

I didn't know any drug existed that could be traceless in less than 3 days, and 3 days is more than enough time to be tested if one thought they were drugged and raped. These men may have raped these women, but I find it highly unlikely they did so with the use of drugs. All of the women admitted to drinking, a few quite heavily. Awesome that the journalist is withholding their names until conviction. If only all journalists extended that act of decency to the accused.
/r/MensRights15/04/14 06:33 AM
54

Fortunately for the boy, choke holds are still on the table.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 10:47 PM
2

It is illegal for a teacher, who has a major power advantage and the ability to groom a student who is forced to follow her/his commands to have a relationship with said student regardless if they are above the age of consent. (College/university does not count).
/r/MensRights07/04/14 11:20 PM
10

It is relevant. Teachers have power over students. There is a power dichotomy between the two wholly in favor of the teacher. Also, I never see pitchforks raised for severe punishment, as you say when the student is beyond the age of consent. What I see here is a call that women teachers should be punished the same as a man would in the same situation. The severity of the punishment is inconsequential, it is the inequality between the punishments mostly seen as the problem.
/r/MensRights04/04/14 08:05 AM
2

There is a reason 2nd and especially 3rd wave feminists hate her... and it is because she mostly speaks sense, while annihilating them. Though, seriously... what was she on in that video. I have seen her speak plenty, and all the other times she was not saying 200 words a minute. The good ol early 90's when everyone was coked up, lol.
/r/MensRights25/03/14 10:01 AM
7

What does soil have to do with this?
/r/MensRights25/03/14 09:39 AM
1

That is because it is regional. Stats in Africa are much different than stats in Eastern Europe, which are much different than stats in the US. In westernized countries, where secondary stds are less common, and the strain of HIV has lower viral loads, I have seen 1 in 2000 stats multiple times. For reference, in 2010, the most recent thorough CDC numbers avail, ~ 5k heterosexual men in the US contracted HIV (580 white, 680 hispanic, 3500 black) compared to ~ 15k women, and ~ 30k gay men. The re…
/r/MensRights17/03/14 04:47 AM
4

There is a lot of truth in what you are saying. That said, human trafficking does exist, and we should do what we can to stop it. I too find a huge problem with wanting to consider all sex workers/prostitutes as sex trafficking. It isn't. Moreover, from what I have read of the Nordic model, it hasn't lessened sex work or trafficking. Just driven them to the internet.
/r/MensRights25/02/14 10:42 PM
0

Now you are defending what is known as the worst amendment ever. Feminist logic. Always the poor womenz. Even when they make the dumbest mistake possible, not the poor womenz fault for not thinking through their decision that did nothing to stop alcohol consumption but created a crime wave unparalleled. Go back to srs, you have no power here.
/r/MensRights18/02/14 10:19 AM
0

But they are just little womenz, with menz feet on their throat. Little more than indentured servants and playthings for the menz, no one listened to the womenz, right? They were so powerless, those poor womenz. It is hilarious that the single worst amendment to the constitution was spearheaded by women. Women should be so proud.
/r/MensRights18/02/14 09:43 AM
1

http://uschs.wordpress.com/2012/12/05/the-21st-amendment-the-end-of-prohibition/ The temperance movement, which took hold in the mid- to late-19th century, actually has its roots in the abolitionist movement, with many of those who wanted slavery eradicated beginning to see the scourge of alcohol abuse and alcoholism as something also worthy of being abolished. Women were the original driving force behind the movement, since they viewed this as an issue that negatively impacted many families. Wh…
/r/MensRights18/02/14 09:33 AM
3

Rich men have had it better than poor men and women...so too, did rich women. With all the hundreds of millions of men bleeding out on battlefields while women stayed safe at home, I think you and I have a much different view of who among the poor had it better.
/r/MensRights17/02/14 10:10 PM
14

Men were so in control, they allowed women, who couldn't vote, to ban alcohol. Point is, this idea that women were just powerless fuckholes beholden to men for most of known times is absurd.
/r/MensRights17/02/14 10:00 PM
2

~120-121
/r/MensRights08/02/14 04:50 AM
4

17 kids? If some woman (or man) has 17 cats I am worried for the well being of the cats. Mia Farrow collected kids like crazy animal people collect animals. Sheesh.
/r/MensRights06/02/14 02:39 AM
16

But it is not based on an INDIVIDUAL model, and do you want to know why? Because I pay more, not on the miles I drive, but because I have a penis, and since others with a penis have more wrecks because they drive a lot, I too am charged what they are. I would have no problem had the healthcare been rolled up into a Social Security like tax, but since it was wrapped up as insurance, it should actually be treated like insurance. Which means if you have a vagina, and boobs, and go to the doctor mul…
/r/MensRights29/01/14 05:33 AM
13

That is correct, women have more wrecks per mile, men drive more miles. I know this much, whenever my girlfriend and I are going somewhere, I am driving regardless of car. I would rather not too, considering I drive ~100 miles a day for my job and she drives 15. What it comes down to, is, men drive a lot more in work related situations, and I have rarely been in the car with a couple where the guy was not driving. Women like to be chauffeured, best I can tell.
/r/MensRights29/01/14 05:24 AM
3

When it is all said and done, she will win the cities of Houston, Dallas, Austin and possibly San Antonio and lose the election by 20 points or more because Texas is a state dominated by the suburbs which surround, but are not part of those cities. She is a national darling, but that does not make her much in Texas. She will lose and lose big. There is a reason no established democrats are running for governor and leaving it someone who was unknown before 6 months ago, and really only known beca…
/r/MensRights23/01/14 11:20 PM
12

I dated a Dallas detective who became a lawyer and then went back to work for the Dallas police. She told me one day the department would be fucked when men all got together and filed a class action lawsuit because the department has a "Always arrest the man in domestic dispute" policy. I can't wait for the day.
/r/MensRights21/01/14 05:27 AM
6

Regardless of her story and how much is embellished, she won't win Texas. I know she is a media darling, but her war chest came mainly from outside of Texas, whereas her competitors money came from Texas. Texas is dominated by the suburbs. It is where most of the money, population and voters preside, and it is bright, bright red. Better to send your money to a state where there actually is a chance. That might be Texas in 20 years, it is not Texas today.
/r/MensRights20/01/14 10:53 PM
5

Does it happen? Sure. But being Asain, how many of your Asian male friends/family etc are dating/married to white women? And this doesn't just come from the women perspective. I know in Japan, a white attractive girl I knew who was teaching english abroad couldn't get a date to save her life. She said that Japanese men only wanted Japanese women, whereas any white slob would be a hit with most Japanese women. One of the biggest detractors for Asian men that I have heard from white women all my l…
/r/MensRights19/01/14 05:25 AM
3

Yeah, I am not at all offended by what is happening to him. I am just always astonished women are offended when someone checks/oogles them. We as a species would not have made it this far had we not been hardwired to like/seek/judge others on sex.
/r/MensRights19/01/14 03:48 AM
16

Aren't they just a hop from Thailand and other SE Asian countries with women who still like men? Maybe the problem these women face is not a lack of eligible men, just that the men in Australia are not too hot on what Australian women have to offer. After all, mining is a huge, profitable industry in Australia, and last I checked, there are few women miners. There are plenty of guys making $60k there. True fact. White guys seem to love Asian women. White women and Asian men, though? Well, at lea…
/r/MensRights19/01/14 03:31 AM
5

If it is only 5%, that is 175 million men tricked. That is hardly an inconsequential amount of men.
/r/MensRights16/01/14 11:48 PM
3

Save the human race? Doubtful. Allow men to be in complete control of their reproductive future, and thus much more likely help with population control? Indubitably.
/r/MensRights16/01/14 11:47 PM
12

There are less rapes, less sexual assaults, more reporting and more information and help available for those who have been raped (as long as they have a vagina) then there has ever been in EVER. That is not a culture of rape. That very much is a culture against rape. A fact that eludes feminists.
/r/MensRights16/01/14 11:43 PM
1

Who is demanding perfect motivations? I am simply assessing who is most likely to want to help men simply to help men. You do realize, that moderates comprise the largest segment of society, right? It is beneficial that the largest segment of the voting public is also the most apt to want to help men without this or that requirement. At the end of the day, the far right and left are not friends of the MRM. They only look to use us to meet their ends and offer table scraps in return. The middle i…
/r/MensRights16/01/14 11:28 PM
1

You may not consider them so, but their writing is overwhelmingly slanted towards the right. They are not huffpost or fox news bad, but they do not tow down the middle either. At the end of the day they are a predominately business oriented paper, and as such, conservative policies most benefit them.
/r/MensRights16/01/14 05:40 AM
1

The problem with the left/right divide is that rarely are those on either extreme of the spectrum in it purely for the betterment of men (not saying you, per se). The biggest likely ally for the MRM is the gooey middle who is not blinded by conservative or liberal ideology, who because of ideology look to help men to achieve some goal only as far as helping their ideological goal is possible. Most liberals only look to help men as far as it will also help women, while most conservatives look to …
/r/MensRights16/01/14 05:36 AM
2

Her biggest musical hit is a song about jewelry. That says plenty about her and her audience, and why both are inconsequential.
/r/MensRights16/01/14 05:30 AM
2

A singer whose most popular song is about getting jewelry.
/r/MensRights16/01/14 05:18 AM
2

Feminists once again believing respect should just be granted, not earned. There are gamers and 'girl' gamers. I have never respected a 'girl' gamer, because by default, they are not there for the games. Gamers I respect because love of the game is why they are there, and that is respectable. P.S. Who doesn't like boobies or the word boobies? Every woman I have ever known has used that term, and I am a year shy of 40... hell, my current girl (36) uses the term all the time.
/r/MensRights16/01/14 05:14 AM
1

Whether it is good or bad (and I agree with you) this is insurance we are talking about, and at least as far as I can tell, it is the only insurance in existence on the planet that charges the sexes differently purely on the basis of their sex and no other metrics. That doesn't sound like insurance to me at all, and yet, insurance it is supposed to be.
/r/MensRights16/01/14 05:09 AM
1

Only on the purview's left constitutionally to the federal government. There is a whole host of law the Fed cannot supersede over the states.
/r/MensRights16/01/14 05:05 AM
1

Driving a car is a privilege, living is not. For the 1st time ever, you are not paying a tax, but instead, being fined not for refusing to meet the standard for a privilege (car insurance) but instead, for simply existing and not meeting a standard. The supreme court did a true end around and proclaimed a penalty as a tax, when the legislation was written specifically not to be a tax but specifically to be a penalty. No one saw that coming because such an action was well beyond the limits we all…
/r/MensRights16/01/14 04:56 AM
0

Then women should pay more for auto insurance so men can pay the "same". Either it is insurance or it is not insurance. Insurance by its very nature creates payment plans based on risks. Beyond having babies, women go multiple times a year for breast exams and gyno visits, much less all the other times for colds and hurts men shrug off. Men rightfully are charged more for car insurance because men drive more than women and thus have more accidents (even if women have more accidents per mile). I …
/r/MensRights16/01/14 04:50 AM
-5

It is always fun to see what will get you to drop a thousand words.
/r/MensRights09/01/14 07:29 AM
3

Pretty sure that is a tongue and cheek article making fun of hipsters.
/r/MensRights09/01/14 07:04 AM
15

It is the single worst thing about online dating. It is no different at all from pick up at a bar or club dating. Women wait to be chased, guys have no choice but to chase. Except online, it is far easier to spam every single girl on the site with a cheesy line, and then women, who almost never send messages first complain non stop about the quality of messages they get. It should be: Everyone is there because they want to meet people. Both men and women send unsolicited messages to those who in…
/r/MensRights08/01/14 02:39 AM
4

Someone I know who did a tour there simply said "There are no men or women mountains in Afghanistan. Just a shitload of mountains you have to climb with 80 pounds on your back". I am all for women being there who can hack it. I personally, as a male couldn't or wouldn't want to, really, I might be able to but am older...but still fit. What I don't want is a male of female on patrol so exhausted from the climb they cannot fight when need be. I foresee far more women with that problem than men. We…
/r/MensRights28/12/13 01:00 AM
9

While it is sad black babies are less likely to be adopted, in a way that likely has more to do with blacks only being 13% of the population. While on the surface, parents looking to adopt should be happy to get a healthy baby, regardless of color, black families usually don't adopt white babies and white families usually don't adopt black babies. Blacks being mostly comprised of lower class/less well to do incomes, are then less likely to be in a position to adopt. Shrug, this is more a demogra…
/r/MensRights26/12/13 06:08 AM
9

Tying them together would protect abortion rights. The reason abortion is supposedly always under threat (though in truth, little more than hassle ever obstructs it) is because men have no reason to ever vote for it. It is not a top 20 voting issue for men, and since ~40% of women are against it(or at the least for more restrictions), it will forever be a pawn moved on the chessboard of politics. Tie legal surrender/financial abortion to abortion, and at least in the US, it will be cemented and …
/r/MensRights26/12/13 02:16 AM
2

listen to rogans show that he was on where he talked about it. You can find on this thing called google.
/r/MensRights25/12/13 03:07 AM
2

They specifically put in place the rules and regulations in Canada regarding spousal and child support that ruined his life. The guy was worth millions. He isn't any more. News Radio has not been on for more than a decade, yet he still has 35k child support payments a month. Those rules were pushed by feminists. From what I have heard of him speak on the subject, he doesn't much care for them.
/r/MensRights25/12/13 03:01 AM
2

I doubt Dave Foley supports feminism today, considering he is in the poor house and under threat of jail due to their policies.
/r/MensRights25/12/13 02:48 AM
3

It is not at all similar to vandalism, morally or otherwise. This is the purest form of speech. Colleges should not be hosting anonymous sexual assault databases. Inundating an already broken system as to make it useless creates a logical conundrum for those who thought it up. There are no doubts now that its inception was a mistake. If there is a rape or sexual assault, it is imperative to report that to actual authorities, not useless college administrators. Police handle rape and sexual assau…
/r/MensRights18/12/13 06:59 AM
37

Hit up the local common grounds or somesuch. Usually, somewhere in a college town there is a coffee shop where lawyers who just passed the bar or those looking to fill up their pro bono will give free service to those with intriguing cases. I think a situation like this would intrigue many lawyers.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 08:03 AM
3

Washing machines, stoves, ovens, dishwashers gave women the ability in a great deal to free themselves from "women's work". That these things could be done so quickly and easily allowed women to go forth and be productive in other ways. There is nothing wrong with housework, and it used to be a full time job, now a man and woman can split the chores and have it all done in a few hours a week. This was a major advantage for women. It is Paglia. She never censors herself. This is what she thinks. …
/r/MensRights17/12/13 06:48 AM
9

It is making fun of feminism. Feminist have claimed programming language is misogynist. This satires that.
/r/MensRights15/12/13 06:46 PM
5

Someone created a new computer language called C+= C plus equality, to smash the patriarchy... where they change all the language from c+ into sanitized feminist speech or trigger words. https://bitbucket.org/FeministSoftwareFoundation/c-plus-equality is the link
/r/MensRights15/12/13 06:10 PM
1

Those laws don't protect their kids. Bullying is a part of life. It is something all people, children or adult experience. I am not saying we should be ok with bullying, but passing laws doesn't stop it. Laws only punish after the fact. Kids today are spineless. Do you think there wasn't bullying 50x worse than anything going on today in the 70's and 80's when it was completely tolerated? We didn't have suicides left and right because of it. These laws do no more than give some people a chance t…
/r/MensRights14/12/13 09:43 PM
6

You know how you counter that? Not by passing worthless legislation but by parenting your kids. Don't let 16 and under on social networks if they are not mentally competent enough to handle it. Raise them to have character and self worth from the inside, not to rely on the whims of their immature classmates. We are creating an entire generation without any backbone by trying to sanitize every situation they will ever face. Prepare them to weather such things, not wither in the face of them.
/r/MensRights14/12/13 06:19 AM
1

Where is the bitterness? Look at the meme that that response is from. You are taking it out of context. There was no bitterness. I like sluts. Every guy I know, likes sluts. Every guy they know, likes sluts. All the gay guys I know, like guy sluts. Guys like like sluts. Does that mean, every male in existence does? I think only you takes it that way. Make no mistake, there is no bitterness when I am talking about sluts. None at all. Bitterness comes from women when guys talk about sluts. That is…
/r/MensRights12/12/13 08:04 AM
1

Women are the enforcers of slut shaming, men do like sluts and have a biological desire for women to be less selective of who they have sex with. I am sorry I don't parse words to make everything sanitized so the least common denominator won't have reason to find offense. Life is too short to give a damn about people like them. If you are on a site like this and all you do is look for offense, again, I feel very sorry for you.
/r/MensRights12/12/13 07:46 AM
1

Have I offended you? This seems fitting http://mildlyrelevant.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/391344_461422320545451_1331369067_n.jpg
/r/MensRights12/12/13 07:09 AM
1

Well, see, the United States is not Africa. Even so, in Africa, do you want to guess who has the lowest chance of acquiring the disease and who has the highest? If facts hurt your feelings, I feel sorry for you.
/r/MensRights12/12/13 07:02 AM
1

Considering most men in the world are heterosexual, I would say that is pretty good news. Can't win em all, but I know I'd rather have the least likely chance of catching a life threatening disease, then most likely chance. And since ~97% of men are heterosexual, and we are in MENSRIGHTS, that is pretty good news. It sucks that you gay guys are in the highest risk factor, for the overwhelming majority of men, being the lowest risk group actually is good news.
/r/MensRights09/12/13 04:18 AM
2

Yeah, I am still in favor of them, just used one today :P Just pointing out, that unfortunately, next to HIV most people consider Herpes to be the one not to get, and you can still get it with a condom, which is perfect grounds for leaving the lights on the check out the goods. That too won't necessarily stop it, but who doesn't like logical reasons to have some light, lol!
/r/MensRights09/12/13 03:52 AM
3

The spread of some STI's... won't stop HPV, Herpes or syphillis
/r/MensRights09/12/13 03:44 AM
-1

Yeah, all you have to do is go through life threatening chemo and then get a bone marrow transplant with a match that is immune. Sounds fun! The good news is, heterosexual men are the least likely of those capable of getting HIV through sex (besides lesbians, who have zero chance). Even gay men who only are tops are almost as unlikely to get it as heterosexual men. It is about surface area, and the penis just does not have much compared to an anus or vagina, nor does it tear easily. Thus men who…
/r/MensRights09/12/13 03:41 AM
6

You are talking to feminists. They are as brainwashed as Scientologists.
/r/MensRights04/12/13 10:46 PM
3

Yeah, I remember when that made front page. "I did this, so you are supposed to do that" logic is exactly why so many of the women on that site I talk to are in bad moods. The "good" guys don't necessarily feel like playing by their rules.
/r/MensRights04/12/13 07:53 AM
5

I am not sure, I think there are more women attracted to large men then short men. Now, short is relative... but I swear, woman after woman has told me they were not interested in someone they had to look down to. But since women, in general range from 5'-5'6 (though some are taller) short is very relative. A 5'3 guy might just be ok to a a 5'1 girl. It all comes down to heels. Women love those foot destroyers.
/r/MensRights04/12/13 06:39 AM
12

IMO, the worst thing about online dating, is that it is just the same bar scene/hookup rules as everywhere else. They set it up in a way where it is easy to interact with each other. Where women are supposed to make the first move at a rate equal to the men, because you are on a dating site and there to meet people. What actually happens is, for the most part, women do what they do everywhere else... except here they post pictures and maybe rate a guy highly, and then wait for him to make the in…
/r/MensRights04/12/13 06:30 AM
1

Oh, she most certainly could decide to abort the baby, it is just a concept that without the child being planned, men would not be beholden to that child and society at large would frown heavily if she ended up keeping it without being able to support it. The overall gist is that unplanned pregnancies are not acceptable. You have let down society by getting pregnant without planning it with a partner who also has the intention of wanting the kid. By all means, women would still have the ultimate…
/r/MensRights04/12/13 05:32 AM
2

They are intentionally creating someone who will never get to experience all there is in the world, and intent, for no other purpose other than a selfish desire to propagate a culture they see under threat because of science, of not allowing him a chance to hear. It would be one thing if they adopted a child who was deaf. No one would say anything about that (though there would be rumblings about keeping technology away from the child that would allow them to experience more of the world.) In th…
/r/MensRights04/12/13 04:12 AM
7

You are injuring the child's chance to live as productive a life as possible. What if that child had the mind of a composer, but never was allowed to hear and thus will never get to be one. It is one thing if chance takes away one of your senses and limits you, it is quite another if a sense was stolen from you on purpose to meet the whim of someone who is more interested in a culture than their child's well being. This is about envy. These women handicapped their child's future because they wer…
/r/MensRights04/12/13 03:28 AM
4

Birth control is so, so very cheap. It is insane to pay the much higher cost of the results of lack of birth control, instead of the minor fixed costs of it. Children cost far more than birth control ever would. Make it free, ubiquitous, and with that, you can use societal pressure to limit unplanned pregnancies.
/r/MensRights03/12/13 08:46 PM
17

Feminists, specifically, do not want men in primary education. Men don't demonize boyish behavior. Feminists want that behavior demonized, so they demonize male teachers to keep them from teaching, and then boyish behavior to feminize boys.
/r/MensRights02/12/13 03:51 PM
1

All hail lord Gaben. Peace be upon you brother. My shrine is newly filled with his blessings from steam. Hallelujah!!
/r/MensRights01/12/13 08:59 AM
-1

Actually, studies I have seen show women dress for other women. Do guys notice what a woman wears? Sure. Do women notice every single detail about what a woman wears, down to shoe type, color scheme, fashion rules, jewelry, nail polish and whether her makeup is the newest style? Double sure. Women are at war with other women fashion wise and us guys just get to enjoy the fireworks.
/r/MensRights30/11/13 07:47 PM
7

I remember reading a social experiment where sociologists set up a doll house in the back yard and let a group of 10 year old girls in and watched them while they played for 10 minutes. There were dolls, and such, and the girls all created scenarios with the dolls and doll house, in a nice orderly fashion, were not loud, what one would think of typical dollhouse play. Then they let in an equal sized group of ten year old boys and watched them as they played. The boys looked at the dollhouse and …
/r/MensRights30/11/13 12:22 AM
3

Child abuse, robbery, normal assault, police brutality. There will be a lot of good come from it, but I am still not sure a 1984 world is worth it.
/r/MensRights27/11/13 02:19 AM
10

Sure, sounds great to me, but a text before sex is better than nothing. Good news is we are probably only ~10 years from 1984ing ourselves, and building homes from the ground up with all room surveillance to catch those "special moments". I kid you not, it won't be the government videotaping our every move... we will do it to ourselves. But at least false rape etc, will be much more rare because of it.
/r/MensRights27/11/13 02:10 AM
1

Considering evidence suggests women dress to impress other women/ show off to other women, if anything they have each other to blame for how whorish they dress at these things. They are not having a competition with men by how they dress, they are at war with other women. Us guys are just enjoying the fireworks.
/r/MensRights27/11/13 01:54 AM
3

I live in Dallas, and typically like The Observer. It is just a free weekly, but that gives them leeway to pursue random stories. Shame it is being infiltrated with this tripe. Their main editor was scooped up by The Dallas Morning News a year or so ago, and the quality has deteriorated considerably since then.
/r/MensRights27/11/13 01:50 AM
8

Not in a he said she said, if all indications/evidence were that she wanted sex, and there was no physical sign or abuse/no extenuating circumstances (neighbors heard her pleading) etc, then I would feel secure with a jury trial. Juries are far more resilient than judges. Now if there was bruising, neighbors testifying, video she fled the apartment in hysterics, etc... then you convicted.
/r/MensRights27/11/13 01:38 AM
1

Women work more and more, yet still considerably less than any other western nation. They achieve less than women in any other western nation, so much so they are moving towards quota's to cook the books. http://www.thelocal.se/20130624/48648
/r/MensRights27/11/13 12:19 AM
0

I am not for or against it. If women want to not work as much, by all means, don't. I am simply pointing out, that in the country where feminism won, women achieve less professionally than they do in the countries where it supposedly has not won. Make no mistake, feminism today is about empowerment, because in every western country, equal opportunity is the law. Feminism is no longer about equal opportunity, it is about equal outcome. And in Sweden, that is only achieved by cooking the books thr…
/r/MensRights26/11/13 10:58 PM
4

Women only work part time in sweden, and achieve less in the workforce, do not attain equal numbers of upper management positions as women in the rest of the West http://www.theglobeandmail.com/globe-debate/do-women-really-have-it-better-in-sweden/article15552596/ While slightly more women are in the Swedish workforce, they only average part time. 73% of US women working avg 36 hours a week trumps 80% Swedish women avg 22 hours a week. See how that works? What do you think those women are doing …
/r/MensRights26/11/13 06:53 PM
166

If it was real, only women would ever be hired. What they don't say is it is based on the type of medicine men and women choose, the type of architecture and the type of lawyer... but, lets just bundle them all together and pretend GP's should make the same as heart surgeons, that home architects should make the same as those who design office buildings and family lawyers should make the same as lawyers that work in the financial sector.
/r/MensRights26/11/13 08:54 AM
21

Thing is, as report after report suggest, it is only mental gymnastics, because in Sweden, where feminism "Won", women achieve less than women from any other western society. Apparently, when you do all the heavy lifting and give both men and women the option to take off for being a parent, and have every sort of childcare option available, and payed for by the state, women choose to take advantage of it an be moms, and men do not take advantage of it and become kings of industry. It is funny, r…
/r/MensRights26/11/13 08:44 AM
4

It is funny. It seems the easiest way to get women back into "women's work", is to make them lazy by giving them perceived equality by coddling their every desire. Men in Sweden dominate because they don't take the same "easy" way that is offered to them like the women do. Apparently, achievement is never easy.
/r/MensRights25/11/13 07:26 PM
1

Because men marry they woman wanting her to stay as she was the day he married her and women marry a man with a litany of changes he needs to make.
/r/MensRights25/11/13 07:19 PM
1

Most women I know use this tact. "It is the person who asks responsibility to pay". Which sounds great. Too bad we don't live in a world where women ask a man out more than once or twice in their life time. That tact would maybe be fair then. I will say, being single, and dating regularly at my age (near 40), women who are near my age, childless and don't want children, are much better than the 35 and under crowd still obsessed with having a baby. I still pay, but they pay the next time, and the…
/r/MensRights25/11/13 07:05 PM
2

I would love to hang out with Paglia. She isn't attracted to men, but she is a fan of masculinity. It would be a blast to goto a biker bar and drink and converse with her.
/r/MensRights24/11/13 10:07 PM
64

This is one of the many reason Paglia is awesome. What are your thoughts on the phenomenon of “rape culture” as it’s reported in the media and talked about on college campuses today? A: It’s ridiculous. The one place we should be worried about is India. Why American feminists haven’t mobilized against gang rapes in India is an absolute outrage. This obsession with rape [in North America] is neurotic. There are attacks on men also. This privileging of the female victim is a distortion. To see the…
/r/MensRights24/11/13 09:48 AM
7

Guess I will only buy Schick razors in the future.
/r/MensRights24/11/13 09:32 AM
12

Equality hurts
/r/MensRights24/11/13 09:22 AM
3

This sounds like a young persons opinion. I am pro abortion, but I am also near 40, and I assure you women who abort think about it later in life. Maybe some of them don't, but enough do to make it a legitimate negative and cause emotional stress both around when it happens and definitely guilt later in life over it. I have seen multiple women break down in front of me when talking about an abortion they had when they were younger. That shit isn't being faked. I don't know what you consider "sig…
/r/MensRights21/11/13 09:29 AM
5

I think the way you get around it, is make a system where the man is automatically enrolled as Legal Parental Surrender, unless the couple is married or there is a contracted agreement between the two people. Make the fee $100, and all of that goes into a fund that would then support women who decided to keep it themselves. What needs to happen is the social norms need to be changed where every child is planned. This idea of a social norm that says only 1 partner in the situation has voting powe…
/r/MensRights21/11/13 09:16 AM
4

Women have always been able to choose adoption as an option and can leave their children at a fire station no questions asked. Just saying, there have always been options for pro life women.
/r/MensRights17/11/13 09:19 PM
28

It is somehow built into the psyche of women that the most romantic thing a man can do is change his very nature to her whims. That is why girls like these glitter vampire flicks so much. The vampires love for the heroine makes him go against his very being. That is why women are often so unhappy in their relationships. They discover guys are not glitter vampires that go against their own nature. I have heard said a man marries a woman and never wants her to change, but she immediately begins to…
/r/MensRights16/11/13 05:43 AM
2

They are only guilty of distribution, anything else is civil and up for debate. They didn't get arrested because of supposed copyright or anything else. They got arrested for distribution, the girls are the original distributors and strangely not arrested.
/r/MensRights15/11/13 10:54 PM
2

You have been implying that the boys are more guilty. The boys and girls are equally guilty.
/r/MensRights15/11/13 10:15 PM
1

It highlights the logical fallacy in your thought process. No one is saying the boys should not have gotten into trouble. Everyone is wondering why the original distributors of the photographs didn't. It was just as illegal for them to distribute the photographs as the boys, yet they are not arrested. Without them originally breaking the law, the boys could not have done so.
/r/MensRights15/11/13 06:24 AM
6

I've learned that you are great at fixing things. That it makes you happy. That what makes you feel joy is to fix someone else's problem. And for all the trouble it's caused, you trying to help us when what we wanted was to vent, I'm sorry. Because to find your joy in helping someone else is one of the most beautiful things I can think of. I want to learn to let you help me. I think if more women understood this, guys and gals would have much less problems. If there is a problem, I want to fix i…
/r/MensRights11/11/13 11:53 PM
18

I disagree. She most certainly believes huge hoop earrings are flattering, when they are not.
/r/MensRights11/11/13 11:20 PM
2

That is why you make it relative to the cost of actually raising a child. Give out a foodstamp/wic style card that can only be used for approved foods, and ~$200 per month. That should alleviate the shopping sprees and also limit anyone thinking that having a kid would benefit them financially. Kids are expensive, but they are not $800 a month expensive.
/r/MensRights11/11/13 09:59 AM
13

The other firefighters will make her stay back at the truck, with the Dalmatian. She is just window dressing anyways.
/r/MensRights11/11/13 05:30 AM
1

If we are for equality, men having the right to choose their own parental future is just as important as women having that right. Women who choose to raise a child on their own, would accept the full burden of doing such. It would be their choice and their problem. No one forced them to choose that path, they are responsible for their choices. Sometimes the taxpayer would have to take up the slack, just as sometimes the taxpayer does now with women who have no idea who the father was. However, t…
/r/MensRights10/11/13 05:22 PM
8

It is made again and again in this thread in this very sub that I was arguing against http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1q3vc2/should_fathers_have_the_legal_right_to_an_abortion/cd983j5?context=3 Basically, men know what risks they are taking and it is unfair to the woman for her to get to choose to have the baby on her own, get an abortion or give the kid up for adoption. Those poor women, being treated like adults, and not necessarily getting their way and having to make a tough deci…
/r/MensRights10/11/13 05:54 AM
4

No it won't. Men will have a window to refuse to be a father. Scumbags are those who refuse to support a child they agreed to, not those they didn't. It might create a lot of women scumbags, though... but that will be their choice, and problem. This will limit by a drastic degree the number of male scumbags. No longer will women be able to force them into something they don't want.
/r/MensRights08/11/13 02:41 AM
5

Equality is about having the same rights. Women should not be able to decide for anyone but themselves. Women are adults and sex should not be consent to anything other than sex. That is what abortion gives women, and men should have the same right. The man can't choose for the woman, and the woman can't choose for the man. Each individual gets their own autonomy. I am for equality, you are for women having power over men.
/r/MensRights08/11/13 01:23 AM
3

lol. Quit using morals since everyone has different morals and instead use logic. Abortion is legal. Since abortion is legal, and it gives women the right to choose their fate, men should have the same right to choose their fate. You cannot argue logically against men having the same right to choose. If the guy didn't want to be a parent, the woman would have choices to make. She could choose what would best fit her. What she couldn't do is force someone else to do what does not best fit them. W…
/r/MensRights08/11/13 12:43 AM
4

It does not fuck them over at all. If that is not something they are comfortable with, they should not have sex. Men should have 100% control in deciding if they will be a parent, just as women have 100% control of deciding their fate on the issue. You do realize forcing someone who does not want to be a parent, to be a parent is just as traumatizing don't you?
/r/MensRights08/11/13 12:34 AM
3

Nah, I am just going to continue to push for equality on the issue. If women get to choose if they will become a parent, so too should men. Having sex is not a jail sentence to women, it shouldn't be for men. Best news of all, the tide is shifting to my view and away from yours.
/r/MensRights08/11/13 12:23 AM
3

So can women. Neither should be forced into responsibility they do not want. Men can't force a woman to be a mother, women shouldn't be able to force a man to be a dad. See how that works? It is called equality.
/r/MensRights08/11/13 12:05 AM
5

If they don't want to abort they can give it up for adoption. Women today get to decide their fate, the father's fate and the fate of the baby. It makes sense they get to decide for the baby, but the man has free will and the ability to decide their own future, not have that future decided for them. If anything, giving men the right to decide their own fate, would actually decrease children born to parents that don't want or cannot support them financially. That is a much better world for childr…
/r/MensRights07/11/13 11:44 PM
2

Well, she gets funding based on it, so no.
/r/MensRights07/11/13 11:36 PM
4

Men quit working for 2 weeks, the world shuts down. Women? Kids don't have to go to school, Doctors have to start working and malls close down.
/r/MensRights06/11/13 04:39 AM
28

This one is just flat out crazy. No way she makes it ten years. She has been coddled and gotten her way her whole life. 3 months of counseling can't fix that.
/r/MensRights06/11/13 04:24 AM
1

That is the point. They are still both for profit insurance plans regardless if you want them to be or not. They both have mandates that make it virtually impossible not to have either without getting fined, through the IRS or tickets. One has simply been changed to pretend that women don't actually use the services more when they do. If this was a single payer folded into social security, I would have no problem, but this is very much still insurance, and as such should be treated no differentl…
/r/MensRights05/11/13 08:37 PM
40

Fine, if men are now supposed to pay more and share a more than equal amount of the costs they will be taking from health insurance, women should pay more for their car insurance lowering the cost for men who pay more since they take more from car insurance. I wonder what women would have to say to this?
/r/MensRights05/11/13 04:38 PM
3

False rape allegations don't real.
/r/MensRights02/11/13 11:06 PM
2

My guess on the authors bit is that half of the readership is male, and thus, seeing that women overwhelming write romance/interpersonal relationship/self help and communicative, whereas men write spy/adventure/science fiction/fantasy and some romance... The majority of men and women like the type of things men write about, whereas most men do not like what women write about. Thus, it is more about audience. As to journalism, it breaks down the same as all industries that require a lot of travel…
/r/MensRights31/10/13 03:18 AM
3

What has been done to disadvantage boys in school. There is no longer recess and PE is heavily curtailed. Boys need both because boys have much more "need to do" stuff energy. This creates an atmosphere where boys cannot sit still and pay attention in class and are thus fidgety, and disruptive. Back when there was traditional PE and recess this was much less a problem. They have removed competition from class. Boys do well in competitive environments, where being number one is lauded. This was a…
/r/MensRights29/10/13 12:21 AM
5

If only feminism didn't put up roadblocks and use their money and influence to to diminish male rights, stop any legislation that would equalize traditional female advantage...
/r/MensRights29/10/13 12:12 AM
4

I hear ya, buddy of mine got stabbed with a knife back in college. I make it well known at the beginning of any relationship that I will defend myself. Strangely, women don't attack me.
/r/MensRights27/10/13 04:58 PM
5

Just ignore it. AMR is brigading. All 8 of their members are active today and their panties are in a bunch. Every guy here is only speaking in self defense.
/r/MensRights27/10/13 04:39 PM
8

If the man wants the child and the woman doesn't, the woman can abort. If the woman wants the child and the man doesn't, the man can financially abort. See how that works? Equal rights. Equality on the issue. They each get to choose their own future. The man can't force the woman to have the child, and the woman can't force the man to be a dad. Can't get more equal than that on the issue.
/r/MensRights26/10/13 08:14 PM
4

No, it is not like saying that at all. It just gives men the same right women have. The right of self determination of whether they will be a parent. Women get to legally decide whether the man will, or will not be a parent. The man has no legal rights in that decision. Everything you are whining about how unfair it would be for women, is how unfair it is for men now. Men get zero right in the decision. Give men equal right to choose their own future. By doing this, the dichotomy would change. B…
/r/MensRights26/10/13 08:06 PM
4

There is no force. Just choices. Adult choices. Bud.
/r/MensRights26/10/13 07:53 PM
2

You are a whiny broken record, aren't you? As it is today, many men want the child their wife or girlfriend aborts... where are your crocodile tears for them?
/r/MensRights26/10/13 07:47 PM
5

Again, women are adults. That would be an adult decision they would have to make. Like an adult. Are they capable enough to raise a child on their own. If not, give it up for adoption, or abort. And next time, choose more wisely before allow a guy to come in them. Women treated like adults instead of children. What a concept. You know what this would create. A system where almost all pregnancies were planned. That would just be awful, wouldn't it?
/r/MensRights26/10/13 07:40 PM
3

Who said at any point? Women have rules that limit abortion, men would have rules equal to that. Say... 4 months. There would have to be exceptions, in cases where it was a one night stand type situation, etc. See, it is apparent you are not for equality. Nothing I have said shifts the power dynamic from one sex to the other. It just equalizes it. Women get the right to decide if they will be a parent. Men should have the same right. Want to know a fun fact. Give men this right, tie it to aborti…
/r/MensRights26/10/13 07:30 PM
5

Women are capable beings. If men can't decide women have to have a baby, women shouldn't be able to decide that a man has to be responsible for a child he does not want. That is actually equal. The woman can still have the child. Women don't need men, isn't that the feminist mantra? Prove it.
/r/MensRights26/10/13 07:20 PM
3

Discriminating laws... How about women get to choose for a man whether he will be financially responsible for a child he may not want for the next 18 years. Women get the right to an abortion, men should have the right for a financial abortion. LOL, go into any feminist circle and promote that for men. I warn you cover your ears, the banshee yells will begin immediately.
/r/MensRights26/10/13 07:08 PM
-2

That you think you will be taken seriously when you end your statement with a supposed god amuses me. Here is the thing. If I pick a fight with someone who can kick my ass, and they kicked my ass, no one says "poor him, he picked a fight with someone who was stronger and got his ass beat". Like I said, women are not children. They are responsible for their actions. If women pick a fight with someone, and that someone,beats their ass.... they just discovered that equality hurts. Women don't have …
/r/MensRights26/10/13 05:39 PM
7

I am pretty sure there is nothing about Ender's Game worth boycotting or throwing a fit about. I have read the book, and there is nothing at all homophobic about the story. If anything, it is about how an outcast overcomes all and saves the world. All of these boycotts are stupid. If I had to agree with everything the producers, directors, actors or writers of a movie believed in there would be absolutely nothing I could watch. Orson Scott Card is already so rich this little boycott will have no…
/r/MensRights26/10/13 04:06 AM
10

If a woman is coming at me with a knife, I am going to bust her face. Actually, I will meet any woman's violence against me with an equal amount of force. Don't want to get hit by me women? Don't get violent with me. Women are not children. Their actions have consequences. Equality hurts.
/r/MensRights25/10/13 10:39 PM
20

Next week should be equal work week, where women have to work more than 37 hours.
/r/MensRights24/10/13 11:50 PM
9

The IDEAL situation to be raised in is a stable home with a mother and father. Not because of their "Roles" but because of how they interact on a day to day basis. I learned a ton about women from watching my mom. There are inherent differences between men and women. That said, a stable 2 parent household is superior to a 1 parent household regardless of the parents gender. It is not about roles that makes a mom a dad best, but about the subtle difference between the sexes and what one learns fr…
/r/MensRights24/10/13 07:32 AM
6

She just discovered that equality hurts.
/r/MensRights22/10/13 01:00 AM
1

That is a hairy situation
/r/MensRights21/10/13 05:47 AM
7

He only introduced the bill. There is zero chance it would ever be a viable law. Crazy zealots introduce crazy laws all the time that they know have no chance of making it, if only to get the publicity and placate their crazy voters. At most, this introduction will be used in an advertisement next election, ala "Congressman X had the guts to introduce a bill that would stiffen penalties against molesters to the strongest in the country, with your continued support he will...". It is grandstandin…
/r/MensRights17/10/13 03:10 AM
2

Funny you use those two, because they are friends, and I remember a video with them walking to a car after a party or something about 20 years ago. When they got to the car, Ashley flashed the guy taking the video her boobs, and Salma just rolled her eye's in that "Oh Ashley" kind of way. Both have been using their sexuality for all it was worth their entire lives... salma still can, and has with billionaires if I am not mistaken... Ashley is losing it tho. Video for those interested: NSFW http:…
/r/MensRights16/10/13 01:29 PM
18

TL;DR When she goes to a tech conference and is so involved with the technology, that she pays no attention to whether the conference is catering to her in a feminine way, and is to busy to search for misogyny in every corner, that doesn't make her a"Gender-Traitor". Also, if someone is sexist to her, she in no way lets it stop her or pays it any mind. If she has a good idea, she follows through with it.
/r/MensRights15/10/13 01:53 PM
6

I don't know, maybe the policy makers, the heads of NOW... the ones who make it impossible by definition for a woman to rape a man to hide that women DO RAPE men? Whenever the issue of alimony, or a mans right to choose whether he wants to be a father comes up, who is it that opposes it at every turn? I mean, you feminists are for equality right? And yet, when a pendulum would swing to make men more equal to women on an issue, Feminists on all fronts are screaming bloody murder, throwing up road…
/r/MensRights13/10/13 07:45 PM
5

Feminism doesn't have any one feminist, or even a group of feminists, who speak for its whole. That is what I mean when I say it's a democratic movement. This is hogwash. Academia and political feminists have control of your message, create your marching orders, control your funding, and make laws that effect everyone. It is like how the Tea Party controls the Republicans. Do all republicans believe as the Tea Party believes? No, but you better believe they are culpable for allowing the Tea Part…
/r/MensRights13/10/13 07:25 PM
1

It has to get into contact with immune cells, which is easiest in the bloodstream. HIV can get to you through other std sites like warts, chancres or herpes, or other open type sores. Else wise it gets in through the thin part of the skin under the penis head which also happens to be where scarring from circumcision thickens the skin. Also, circumcised men no longer have mucosal tissue because that is located on the foreskin. Are these the only possible ways? No, but they are the most common, an…
/r/MensRights13/10/13 06:35 PM
2

You guys did see that they did not test for HIV in this study. I am all for stopping circumcision, but I would have never believed it would have stopped the skin to skin contact ones (HPV,herpes,syphilis) or something like chlamydia or gonorrhea that easily take hold in the urinary tract. HIV is a whole different animal because of its more difficult requirements for transference to males.
/r/MensRights13/10/13 10:33 AM
2

You have to be logical to code. Does that mean a feminist couldn't code? Of course not, but as I am sure you can attest, that kind of logic makes on see through feminism's smokescreen. Shrug. It is why the vast majority of hard scientists are not believers in God. Feminism is a religion of sorts, and most logical people don't buy into those. P.S. High five!
/r/MensRights13/10/13 09:29 AM
11

Nah, feminists can't code. Women who can are by nature extremely unlikely to sway feminist, and realistic about who their market is and who pays their bills. Plus, most girls like tits too. Tits are one of the major visual physical differences between guys and girls, and they understand this... which is why they dress the way they do. It is just an easy distinguishing identifier.
/r/MensRights12/10/13 11:42 PM
3

The average gamer is more like 35, but they won't be playing this game, and that average is derived by using things like farmville and angry birds. It is better to look at this by what gaming it is, and that is CORE gaming. Core gamers average much younger, don't include all the social gaming (MMORPG, Casual crap) and don't give an eff about the outsides need to sanitize and feminize their space. Political incorrectness is just fine with core gaming (GTA5 is core, and no political correctness) a…
/r/MensRights12/10/13 11:40 PM
9

Anyone notice that those who don't need feminism are more attractive than those who do? They don't look damaged or as if they are carrying a giant chip on their shoulders, either. They look happy, not bitter.
/r/MensRights10/10/13 08:04 AM
1

You and everyone else posting here do realize that almost everyone else takes their work home with them too, right? So... you dad work x hour days then x hours at home, then is off for the summer, most other business people work x hour days, then x hours at home (we all have cellphones, and computers and work gets taken home too) and doesn't get 3 months off for summer. Teachers have it pretty effing good.
/r/MensRights10/10/13 02:01 AM
4

"Men will never understand women. Women understand women, and don't like them."
/r/MensRights09/10/13 07:15 AM
5

When you are being kicked off a train, and then the guys who kicked you off the train are looking out to make sure you don't get hit by said train, all the "I am a victim" yelling in the world probably won't work. Especially, when you are still on the ground and slurring "I am being assssuuultted offficcerr...". Thankfully, there is a limit to victimization. Not that that stops women from trying to play that card.
/r/MensRights09/10/13 07:13 AM
15

or have superior work-life balance (teaching), then they will blatantly ignore gender disparities. Not only ignore them, but trump up "how they are not payed enough". Here is the thing. Teachers work 8-9 months a year and make 90% of what someone with their qualifications make working 11.25 months a year. I am not saying teachers shouldn't earn more, I am saying they could work summer school and make over 100% of what others with their qualifications make, and still get more time off. Ever notic…
/r/MensRights09/10/13 06:46 AM
1

No offence, but if he is your husband, and he has to wear a condom while you blow him, he is less happy than you think.
/r/MensRights09/10/13 06:41 AM
9

No, that is sexism. When you say modern definition, what you are really saying is the "everything women don't like"= mysoginy. Sexism is basing something solely off of someones sex. Women aren't good at math and have a lower math IQ because they are women is sexist. There is no ill will. It is absurd, and archaic thinking, but there is no malice in it. All women are cunts is misogynistic. All women are dumb is sexist. There is malice in one, not the other. Misogyny is so broad as to be meaningle…
/r/MensRights08/10/13 07:44 AM
14

I really hate this "anything women don't like and is sexist" = Misogyny. Thinking women are less intelligent because they are women is sexist as hell. It is not misogynistic. That actually requires something. Hatred. Everything is not misogyny just because it carries a negative connotation. I generally don't think women are very good at video games. A few are really, really good at them. My view may be sexist, but the reason they are not generally good at video games is because they do not spend…
/r/MensRights08/10/13 03:07 AM
1

YAY! Dallas schools doing well. It is so often that they are not. There are suburbs of Dallas that do well, and one or two magnet schools, but overall, one hears about how behind those in Dallas public schools are.
/r/MensRights05/10/13 03:37 AM
2

Less vocal to men, women are crazy vocal to each other. A gaggle of them put to shame anything that might ever be discussed in a lockerroom, but that is ok, because when women do it, they are bonding, not being pervs. /s
/r/MensRights04/10/13 02:30 AM
1

It is superb because it is a true story of a victim, not opinion. That is the problem with AVfM. Not the facts or testimonials, but the idiots espousing their opinions.
/r/MensRights04/10/13 01:55 AM
1

He said that because he repeatedly just ran over hookers and female pedestrians. Self fulfilling prophesy.
/r/MensRights02/10/13 07:26 AM
3

I am pretty sure it is neither misandry or misogyny. It is a game that casts certain individuals in a negative light. Those two terms actually mean hatred of all women/men based solely on their gender, and that is not the case in GTA5. Making fun of the uptight feminist is not misogyny, nor is portraying a male character as a violent psycho misandry.
/r/MensRights02/10/13 07:23 AM
1

Yeah, hunny, I am going to need to record all of our sex for verification purposes.
/r/MensRights02/10/13 07:17 AM
-3

The ones in Russia sure don't seem to happy. I know I would hate to be gay in the middle east. I mean, I am sure they find happiness in everyday things, but having to hide your sexuality less you be imprisoned or much, much worse would probably make one pretty melancholy about their sexuality.
/r/MensRights02/10/13 07:16 AM
1

Well, awesome, they will have subpar boards because of it and be more likely to fail. Will suck for Europeans, but will be great from American companies that are hiring the best person for the job.
/r/MensRights02/10/13 07:10 AM
1

Yeah, it is not rapey at all. At least any definition of rape that has been around for millennia. I guess it is new wave rapey, but I do not prescribe to that.
/r/MensRights02/10/13 06:50 AM
1

Offering an ultimatum, on the other hand, is manipulative. So is constantly nagging someone when they've already given you every indication that they won't change. And anyway, do you really want the threat of you leaving to be the motivating factor in your relationship? Shouldn't caring about you and loving you be enough? It should be, but say you asked 3 times and get no sex for 3 months, and she comes home one day and all your bags are packed and divorce papers are on the door. YOU are the ass…
/r/MensRights02/10/13 06:48 AM
1

You know, he is technically right... there are only about 1 billion people in westernized societies that are accepting of gay people. That leaves 6 billion that are not, and just by % the majority of gays live where they are unaccepted, and are likely very unhappy because of it.
/r/MensRights02/10/13 06:36 AM
1

It is about the power dichotomy. That is what it is about. So, hate to point this out, but it you who does not understand. We can both disagree with it, but it is because a father/mother/stepfather/stepmother has dominion (authority) over a child and can use that dominion to groom them. That is the reasoning. I understand it, you whine about semantics.
/r/MensRights01/10/13 11:21 PM
2

And the REASON they consider a stepfather INCEST, the thinking behind it, is because he can GROOM her. That is the logic on why a non blood relative gets shoehorned into incest in WV.
/r/MensRights01/10/13 10:58 PM
2

http://law.justia.com/codes/west-virginia/2005/61/wvc61-8-12.html 2005 West Virginia Code - §61-8-12. — Incest; penalty. (3) "Daughter" means a person's natural daughter, adoptive daughter or the daughter of a person's husband or wife; (4) "Father" means a person's natural father, adoptive father or the husband of a person's mother; I didn't say they had an anti grooming law, I implied the reason they consider stepfather as incest is because he would have the ability to groom her like few others…
/r/MensRights01/10/13 10:19 PM
3

He was an authority figure over her, and her STEPFATHER. Legally, that is enough in this state. As someone else said above, it likely has to do with if he was "grooming" her for this.
/r/MensRights01/10/13 09:51 PM
14

There is a power dichotomy between a parent and a child that overwhelmingly favors the parent.
/r/MensRights01/10/13 08:41 PM
15

I don't know if you are aware, but advertisement has been predominately geared towards women for decades. Take out beer commercials and it is all women centric (that is not child advertising). And the authors assumption that advertisers are not speaking to women correctly is absurd. Advertisers job is to get women to buy things, and guess what, women buy loads of crap they don't need. I'd say advertisers know exactly how to approach women, it is just people like this author wish women were not s…
/r/MensRights01/10/13 12:16 AM
3

it makes reddit 10x better and pictures 100x easier to see.
/r/MensRights01/10/13 12:15 AM
-1

Are you the only Asian that doesn't understand math? He said fractional chance... how do you equate fractional to "you can hardly proclaim we are all sons of ghengis" http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2003/02/0214_030214_genghis.html
/r/MensRights21/09/13 05:38 AM
2

We could organize a buyout on the down low and no one attend. Let them speak to an empty theater... that would be priceless.
/r/MensRights18/09/13 01:31 AM
8

I have been playing just as long... you got by the cyclops in Zork by mentioning Ulysses iirc. How the eff I figured that out at age 8 is beyond me.
/r/MensRights16/09/13 02:02 AM
65

I have always held this belief. Women are not treated any different than guys are in the trash talking environment. The words used might be different, and if there is any reaction to them they will always be used. Guys are used to how guys trash talk. We have grown up with it. Girls are not. And when girls are trash talked by guys the way guys trash talk other guys girls respond by thinking it is based off their gender, when in truth it is because they are in an environment that has not been fem…
/r/MensRights16/09/13 01:59 AM
4

I find it really humorous I say that guns are not the problem but culture is and then you say this to discount me "This cultural influence goes that far that someone who plans on murdering someone would probably not even consider using a gun, this is visible in the statistics, while 56% of homicides in the US are done with a gun, only in 12% of the homicide cases in Finland a gun is involved, 0.3% in Germany where gun avaibility is much lower than in Finland." It is almost as if you are saying i…
/r/MensRights15/09/13 12:17 AM
15

Yep, it is irrational. Study from Harvard showing no correlation between gun control and murder/suicides. http://www.theblaze.com/blog/2013/08/28/harvard-study-gun-control-is-actually-pretty-counterproductive/ Finland... highest gun ownership in western world, lowest murder/suicide rate... go figure. Guns are not the problem, culture is.
/r/MensRights14/09/13 10:12 PM
2

You may think of it as testicular cancer, but his foundation is for all cancer survivors. It is to show what is capable after cancer. The reason breast cancer awareness is so marketable is because breasts are marketable. And women are just as breast conscience as men.
/r/MensRights14/09/13 09:08 PM
-1

Livestrong was all cancer and was successful because a cancer survivor won 7 Tour De France's. The secret to the breast cancer stuff is breasts. Duh. 15 year old girls are not wearing "BOOB" bracelets because of their color, but because they have the word BOOB on them.
/r/MensRights14/09/13 08:17 PM
29

I live in Dallas and The Dallas Morning News, a legitimate paper, unlike the mail online, said that she just had a large collection. I never got the feel from reading it that she was running any sort of "operation", she just traded and collected a vast amount of it over the years. My guess is she was using TOR or other semi-anonymous systems to transfer the files. Shrug, it didn't say. Her husband was not suspected because he was not at home when the files were being shared, she was.
/r/MensRights14/09/13 07:24 PM
7

She is not a fucking programmer. She markets through twitter. Her programming skills consist of getting on a soapbox and whining on twitter. That bitch couldn't understand pascal, much less c++
/r/MensRights13/09/13 06:32 AM
1

Good news is, they know and are completely changing their future approach because they do not ever expect to receive donations in the future like they did in the past. They still have a war chest, but it will continue to shrink until they are no more. Their extinction has already begun, and they know it.
/r/MensRights12/09/13 01:42 AM
31

Adria Richards didn't even have a tech job, she was marketing for a tech company.
/r/MensRights10/09/13 05:35 PM
22

Basically, best I can tell, it is a whole bunch of "Men actually do have problems, these could be potential supporters of us, they are educated and well off and young and a potential voting bloc in our favor" countered by "We will never be able to get them to buy into our bullshit stances, they potentially pose a threat to us because they are growing so fast, are young, and well educated and if they ever do actually organize they will become enemy number 1 to the load of bollocks we have been fa…
/r/MensRights10/09/13 03:48 AM
2

See, the problem with male only schools is it takes away the need to feminize the boys. They would get recess, have strong role models in the class, and all this male demonization that takes place today in mixed sex schools would not be necessary. The feminists will not allow that. Masculinity is evil and needs to be brainwashed out of the boys.
/r/MensRights10/09/13 12:18 AM
2

Lol, not supposed to take "Rape Culture" literally is like saying you are not supposed to take "Slut Walks" literally. Here is an idea. Instead of creating gobbly gook, catch phrase power words that don't actually mean what they say, use words that do mean what you are saying. It was intentional to use the term Rape Culture to imply there is a culture that is promoting rape. Our culture is the most anti-rape any culture has ever been in ever. It is insane to imply otherwise. There is a Rape Cult…
/r/MensRights08/09/13 08:03 AM
4

They can be mothers, who work 60 hours a week and have their children raised by nannies and daycares... they don't want to be those mothers, though. They want to actually see their children and are content to let the fathers likely play that role. I feel so sorry for them. Poor things.
/r/MensRights06/09/13 04:32 AM
3

It is more than just strength though. It is strength, speed, balance, quickness, ups and testosterone.
/r/MensRights04/09/13 04:33 AM
1

The only stuff censored here is manhood academy tripe. It is spam or male shaming and nothing more.
/r/MensRights31/08/13 07:56 AM
4

My business, my right. I can run any special I want. You can find male only nights or male special drink price nights at gay bars... it does exist.
/r/MensRights31/08/13 07:41 AM
6

Holy fucking shit "And in that more complicated discussion, you have to leave room at least for the option of choice—that women just don’t want to work the same way men do. ". She is so about to have her female card taken away from her. It is no-no number one to suggest that women and men are different and approach work differently. I expect the vagina repossession team has already been dispatched by the feminists. I know, I know... having a vagina does not make one a feminist, but the feminists…
/r/MensRights31/08/13 05:32 AM
5

What is most troubling to me is this line "Ms Lawson warned that making false accusations could backfire and result in a parent losing time with their child." It should say "when a determination is made that a parent makes a false accusation, that parent forever loses the right to visitation with their children without a court appointed supervisor." Yeah, I think if that were the standard, many of these false claims would disappear.
/r/MensRights26/08/13 05:23 AM
2

I haven't been downvoting them either. That said, you are correct, I do know what the purpose of a slut walk is, and just feel they should not incorporate that name if they do not actually support sluts, which we both know they do not. Those guys were out there to support sluts. Problem is, no sluts were in that march. Women looking to make a political statement with the intent to shame men were. That there were men out their who were 100% in favor of sluts infuriates those types, because when i…
/r/MensRights26/08/13 04:03 AM
2

The law is the law, and no one weeps for boys in the same situation. While I agree that an 18 and 14 year old are within the range of acceptability, if a male would be considered a predator under the law in this situation, so too, should she.
/r/MensRights26/08/13 03:45 AM
-2

That site is the PETA of the MRM. More interested in causing a ruckus and bringing attention to themselves through controversy than making headway in the cause. The people of PETA will swear that their rhetoric helps animals, but the general public has a severe distaste for PETA. AVfM is on the same path.
/r/MensRights25/08/13 07:40 AM
8

Someone specifically trained to use language to convey instructions or meaning to a certain audience. We turn engineer speak into something the marketing department can understand. It is a top flight English degree. One you can actually make money with and use. Technical writers make the technical understandable.
/r/MensRights25/08/13 07:25 AM
9

Lol, you little clown. I am a technical writer. You are making a mistake challenging me on the use of words. My syntax is fine. Your comprehension and usage skills are the problem.
/r/MensRights25/08/13 05:39 AM
13

Pointing out a well known feminist is making provably false statements is not bitching. Bitching would be along the lines of "I don't like her, how dare she, screw her"... you should study this thing called the English language. He did not bitch, he made a statement.
/r/MensRights25/08/13 04:33 AM
16

Their reaction? They are not sluts. Sluts would not be pissed at straight guys supporting them. That is not how sluts operate. Sluts like straight guys... that is why they are sluts.
/r/MensRights24/08/13 10:49 PM
-6

It is true that not all guys loves sluts, but it is true that MOST do. Why wouldn't we. We like sex, and do so, fervently, even though we are demonized for it. That little girl I bet makes wonderful grades in her women's studies program. Funny thing though, about a women's studies degree... I can't think of a degree that makes a woman more reliant on a man to support her, lol. Jokes on her!
/r/MensRights24/08/13 10:48 PM
2

"Die in a fire" is not and will never be a threat. It is the ultimate "i despise you" statement. It is a one off, an ender...The type of thing someone immature or so filled with rage says to someone they hate. It is callous, but it is a statement, not a threat. Wishing death on someone is not the same as threatening someone with death, that anyone could mistake the two just adds language comprehension to their list of inadequacies. As an aside, I have upvoted you way more than anyone else here, …
/r/MensRights24/08/13 01:36 AM
2

What most other people don't get is the habitable landmass of Texas encompasses almost the entire state. Texas is effectively 5 states. East Texas is where all the hicks are, San Antonio south and west to the borders is little Mexico. DFW is where most of the money lies, while the panhandle to New Mexico is oil/ranching and Houston is a mishmash of it all plus all the Katrina riff raff. It takes 12 hours to cross the state east to west in a car, and 13 north to south. Texas is vast, and unlike A…
/r/MensRights22/08/13 06:43 AM
12

That is forever canceled because of... fire alarms...
/r/MensRights22/08/13 12:09 AM
3

Was coming here to post this link. If this were the attitude of most feminists I'd be on board. I don't agree with her on everything, but it is apparent from the disdain most of the rest of feminism shows this women that feminists do not like those who speak against the prevailing narrative. That there is going to be an actual debate instead of just a circle jerk of agreement is at least a step forward. I will be interested in seeing a youtube of it. Wonder how well the crowd will control themse…
/r/MensRights22/08/13 12:06 AM
16

hence "tits or GTFO". If you want special treatment on the internet degrade yourself or learn to take it like everyone else and stand on the merits of your argument.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 03:58 AM
4

Why is everyone downvoting this guy, it isn't his fault he comes from the least friendly city in the US except for the city of brotherly shove.
/r/MensRights08/08/13 09:20 AM
2

Yeah, men have more accidents overall, but women have more accidents per mile... shrug. Makes sense to me. I have never seen a man put on eyeliner while driving to work.
/r/MensRights03/08/13 12:05 AM
8

I don't seem to recall the law, or courts, forcing Augusta National to allow women.
/r/MensRights02/08/13 01:06 PM
2

Women use healthcare far more, and to the best of my knowledge, auto insurance costs is ultimately based on how much you drive, and men generally, drive much, much more than women on average.
/r/MensRights02/08/13 01:02 PM
3

Because quite simply, the police investigate it and look for actual evidence, where as a school can dole out punishment without evidence. Which do you think the feminists prefer?
/r/MensRights29/07/13 11:54 PM
7

Lol, http://www.time.com/time/business/article/0,8599,2015274,00.html if anything, data shows that childless women under 30 make more than men under 30 in their peer group.
/r/MensRights29/07/13 04:08 AM
2

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Margaret_Sanger Feminist icon, started what becomes planned parenthood, proponent of eugenics to get rid of undesirables... I think she has to do with what he is suggesting.
/r/MensRights29/07/13 04:03 AM
2

Historically sure, but last ten years plenty of women have run, and they lose.
/r/MensRights27/07/13 03:19 PM
2

I always find it funny. There are more women in the US than men, yet all of the politicians are majority men. Even when women run against men, men still get elected. Do women trust women less than they trust men? The ballot box sure seems to suggest so.
/r/MensRights27/07/13 01:16 PM
3

Yeah, whatever. You know who will never again be employed in the tech industry> Adria Richards. She is toxic waste.
/r/MensRights23/07/13 06:55 PM
1

I hear ya, almost same stats as you. Shrug, I am thin. It comes in handy. People don't ask me to help them move heavy furniture. What is not to like? Best part is, now that I am in waning years of my 30's, all of those perfect, chiseled manly men I used to envy are all fat. It turns out, you have to go to the gym twice as much as you age to keep that physique, and they instead go half as much as they used to and still eat the same. No worries, plenty of girls like thin guys. You will be just fin…
/r/MensRights23/07/13 01:54 AM
3

It doesn't matter what color the kids are and what color you are. If I am taking care of a friends kids and take them to the park, unless there is an apb out in the area for kidnapped kids and a kidnapper, being in the park is not illegal or suspicious for me or them, and if the kids are not in distress the cops should look at the situation, see that it is nothing more than a caretaker looking after kids while they play and go tell nosy lady who called it in to quit wasting police time and mind …
/r/MensRights23/07/13 12:59 AM
3

You have to give them your name, you do not have to provide a state issued ID.
/r/MensRights22/07/13 11:34 PM
8

which is why you have video. There are even services now that immediately upload said video to the net where the cops that perpetrate these ills cannot tamper with it. 5 years from now when we are all wearing some newfangled form of google glass, this ability to police the police will be one of the few good things that come from such intrusive inventions.
/r/MensRights22/07/13 10:33 PM
1

did he have a camera in his patrol car? I would be seeking that if I were you/your defense.
/r/MensRights22/07/13 10:06 PM
1

Ahh. Well, I would hope you don't have to have ID up there just to be out and about, but of that I am not certain. Good luck with your case.
/r/MensRights22/07/13 10:00 PM
2

Are you in the states?
/r/MensRights22/07/13 09:55 PM
6

Definitely have a video recorder going, like this guy did. It is kryptonite to dick cops. Everyone having one presumably in their pockets will create a tidal shift in power between the cops and the public. They serve at our leisure, not the other way around, and video will reinforce that balance that has them back up/corroborate corrupt cops instead of protecting the public interest.
/r/MensRights22/07/13 09:49 PM
32

He shouldn't have shown them his ID. He was doing nothing that required it, and we in the US have no requirement to show our ID except for very specific reason, of which watching your grand kids play on swing set in a public park does not qualify. Tell them your name, ask if you are under arrest, and when they say no, turn your back to them and go about your business. If you are ever in a situation like this, I swear you will notice that they will do whatever they can to not answer the whether y…
/r/MensRights22/07/13 09:32 PM
3

Thanks. Feminist whitewash happened fast on this vid.
/r/MensRights22/07/13 05:08 PM
1

Exactly, the only plotting against women that goes on is devising ways to escape their noise!
/r/MensRights20/07/13 06:41 PM
2

Here is the thing. Look at how women whine and complain about how they are not treated nice and special in gaming. How by god, things better change blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah. The way women are treated in games is the way guys treat each other all the time. That actually is "normal" masculine behavior. To constantly talk shit looking for an edge. Do guys complain about it? No. Only women and always women. There is nothing wrong coming to the conclusion that men and women are fundame…
/r/MensRights20/07/13 06:29 PM
0

I completely disagree. Men and women have completely different norms of acceptable behavior. These clubs, online and gaming are the last bastions where maleness or masculinity are completely allowed. Women and feminism have sanitized all other spaces to conform to their wants and standards. There should be places where guys can be guys and let their guard down, and that only happen when women are not around enforcing their standards on those around them.
/r/MensRights20/07/13 02:48 AM
1

The problem is that men are not bothered by being away from women, which, obviously, bothers women. That men are content with women having their own space, must mean, men are up to no good, especially if they want their own spaces too, and spend considerable amount of time at them specifically to get away from the women in their lives. It all comes down to the feelz, and women's hurt feelings that given a choice, guys prefer guys when sexy time is not happening. We just endure women, and that hu…
/r/MensRights20/07/13 02:44 AM
1

I like totally didn't get hired because I can remember to write things down... I got hired because I can chew gum and look good in a pair of ugg boots. At least that is what seems like in Texas. I was a waiter 20 years ago and waitstaff was pretty much 50/50 m/f... nowadays, almost all female staff.
/r/MensRights20/07/13 02:25 AM
11

I kinda addressed this at the end of my paragraph. The phrase "tits or GTFO" was created especially for them. As in, if you want to be treated special because you are a girl online, show your tits. Or in other words, fuck off girl, no one gets treated special in gaming.
/r/MensRights19/07/13 04:28 AM
21

This is true. Women are not treated well in the gaming community, but they are still generally treated better than guys treat each other. Pretty much everywhere but online and male lockerrooms and bathrooms, things have been sanitized to protect girly feelings. When they enter these spaces they do so with the belief that they are just being mistreated because they have boobs, instead of what all us guys know... those boobs still get them some preferential treatment. If they show them, lol.
/r/MensRights18/07/13 10:22 PM
1

if the judge adheres to it, if not, problem not solved, all your base belong to her.
/r/MensRights17/07/13 06:32 AM
2

mom wants to continue lie because former husband will throw a fit when he finds out kid isnt his.
/r/MensRights17/07/13 06:29 AM
4

Time to break up the band. If you don't like being around her, then don't be around her and block her from facebook so you don't have to associate with her. Hang out with just your buddy, and if your friend is always with her, then hang out with him less and find other friends.
/r/MensRights17/07/13 06:11 AM
4

This looks like a job for MR Edmonton! That poster is ripe for the same treatment.
/r/MensRights17/07/13 05:55 AM
6

Yeah, go full silent mode. Do your job, answer questions to the point and don't give a fuck about any female in your office. Be real chummy with the guys and talk to them all you want, but it is obvious the women in your office are your enemies, so ignore them. Also, if I were you, I'd grab an app for your phone and visibly record any conversation you have with women. Take it out of your pocket, tell them to hold on, hit the record button then set the phone in front of them so it is visible that…
/r/MensRights17/07/13 02:53 AM
5

lol, they did not use stand your ground as a defense, that you think they did only shows you yourself are part of the circle jerk of misinformation and shouldn't be commenting. He was acquitted purely on self defense, as all evidence pointed to him defending himself... all the feels pointed to what you are claiming.
/r/MensRights16/07/13 11:29 PM
11

He got acquitted because every shred of evidence pointed to self defense under the law as written in Florida. From physical evidence showing only Martin threw punches to the prosecutions own witnesses saying Martin made it home and went back to "get that cracker". Zimmerman was acquitted because there never should have been charges in the 1st place.
/r/MensRights16/07/13 11:27 PM
1

Who said anything about punishing? Not me. My point is that a 35 year old man is still attractive to a 25 year old woman, and in many cases are more attractive then 25 year old men, where as, 45-55 year old men are not that attractive to 35 year old women, and moreover, much less successful in creating viable babies, and while you do see some 35 year old women with younger men, you don't see it very often... i am going to guess that 25 year old men aren't that attractive to 35 year old women... …
/r/MensRights16/07/13 08:24 PM
3

Which is why many of them have a future with only cats to listen to their bitterness. Most girls really do believe they deserve to be princesses with their own storybook prince charming that is better looking, stronger, and more able than all other men... oh, and rich too, so they will never have to work. LOL... What many of them run into today, is by not attaching themselves to a nice guy in their 20's and instead chasing batman with a fallback plan that they will just settle in their mid 30's …
/r/MensRights15/07/13 08:27 PM
3

There is no shot at a civil rights charge. They might attempt it to appease the supposed outrage, but a couple of hundred people picketing in each city in a country of 300 million, hardly qualifies as real outrage. Also, from what I have read, the FBI investigation has come up with zilch showing Martin was noticed because of his skin color... he was noticed because of how he was dressed and the way he was acting. And best I can tell, that doesn't break civil rights, as much as Sharpton and the N…
/r/MensRights15/07/13 03:26 PM
3

Here is what it really comes down to. Not attractive men, are not all that bothered about being not that attractive, fat, whatever. Unattractive women, are extremely bothered by not being attractive. Feminists, many of whom are not attractive, hate the way they look, and instead of deciding not to be bothered by it, they rage at men for their dislike of and obsession of their own looks, and for the men not being wounded when women don't find the men that attractive. Here is something that these …
/r/MensRights15/07/13 02:56 PM
1

For the most part what is going on in texas is a speed bump and nothing more. Pro abortion money will flood in to upgrade the clinics and they will only temporarily be closed. Probably not even a month. The thing is, most polls show the majority of people in the US are ok with a 20 week limit. The other limits are common sense. Ru486 has to be prescribed by a obgyn. Big deal. Women's groups are throwing a fuss about this, but guess what... no one else really is. This is a chess move that will be…
/r/MensRights13/07/13 10:28 PM
13

Things like this, and 3 strikes your out and other crazy "take the ability for judges to judge" is the same line of thought that gave us 5 year olds being expelled for drawing gi joe and pecks on the cheek. This zero tolerance attitude is a terrible miscalculation of justice.
/r/MensRights13/07/13 10:15 PM
13

At about the 5:05 mark a nurse sums up why women are not in stem fields: "It is not as exciting as working with people and talking."
/r/MensRights13/07/13 10:09 PM
4

http://www.syracuse.com/news/index.ssf/2011/07/women_worse_drivers_more_crashes_than_men_less_driving.html Guys just drive many, many more miles than women. All the stay at home moms that might drive 5 miles a day, compared to their husbands drive 50-80 a day to and from work. Plus, all the shipping and long haul drivers are almost all male. I know when I was a kid, my mom made my dad chauffeur her everywhere. If they were in the car together, he was driving. I know from personal experience, mos…
/r/MensRights12/07/13 11:00 PM
13

And men are not statistically worse drivers than women on a per hour driven basis... it is just that men drive far more hours a year then women, upping the the chance of an accident. Women actually have worse statistics then men per hour driven...
/r/MensRights12/07/13 10:45 PM
6

If by debate you mean shriek like banshees every time MR Edmonton makes a point they will be interested. But if by debate you mean have a thoughtful discussion where each side defends their viewpoint with thoughtful, logical arguments... not so much.
/r/MensRights11/07/13 01:11 PM
3

There would have to be conditions that preclude the woman from trapping him (surprise, you haven't seen me for 9 months but look at your new bundle of responsibility) but yes, in the overwhelming majority of cases, the woman would have plenty of time to abort, and many reasons to reveal the pregnancy asap.
/r/MensRights10/07/13 10:07 PM
8

IMO, they see it as an attack/punishment, because it gets rid of their ability to blame/scapegoat the man for their situation . If men can opt out during the pregnancy, and the woman decides to continue knowing full well, it is all on her, she loses that societal "poor woman" empathy society extends to single moms with 'deadbeat dads". If it is her decision to carry through with an unplanned (or possibly planned by her) pregnancy, and she fails miserably in ability to support the child, no longe…
/r/MensRights10/07/13 05:04 PM
10

Especially when those most offended by the word are the biggest users of these words: Dick, prick, and cock. But hey... who are we as men to point out these truths? We are dicks, pricks and cocks...and wait for it RAPISTS, thats who. lol
/r/MensRights10/07/13 03:46 PM
2

It is strange depending on your culture how one views this. It used to be normal in north america for this to be the case. Why not live with your parents, until there is real reason not to? That reason, typically being, you got married. It seems to me this view changed after WW2 when the US went from a frugality to a time of plenty. I think it is still common (or moreso) in older cultures like those in Spain, and Italy. Times are changing, jobs are less reliable, and less young men/men then ever…
/r/MensRights10/07/13 02:28 PM
34

That s what I call 'dumb cunt syndrome'. Is it crass that I use the ultimate girl no-no word? Probably. But when one refers to someone else they have never even met as a rapist because they do not drink the same Kool Aid... dumb cunt seems the most appropriate words to describe them.
/r/MensRights10/07/13 01:50 PM
8

There is less rape today then there has ever been in EVER. So they keep redefining rape to propagate the 'rape culture' myth.
/r/MensRights10/07/13 01:27 PM
7

Women vote against abortion and the main reason abortion is in constant flux is because a males right to choose to financially abort is not tied to it. Wanna guess who is most opposed to a males right to financially abort? Voting wise it is ~ 60%-40% women for and against abortion. Making it only a women's issue is feminists doing and problem. Women get equal pay for equal work, you just have to account for benefits (better insurance, more time off, more use of insurance, other perks men do not …
/r/MensRights08/07/13 02:38 AM
6

Dude, they are not working for the same cause. Feminism achieved equality 30 years ago. Now, they are continually moving the goal posts to justify their existence.
/r/MensRights08/07/13 02:32 AM
14

A site that has a section called "celebrity-skin" complaining about topless models. Priceless.
/r/MensRights06/07/13 11:44 PM
26

I always find it humorous, that women, who constantly barrage men with sayings like "women can do anything men can do better" demand men make games for women. You would think they would be insulted with such requests, seeing how they can do it better. Why would they want an inferior product made by us hapless men. I mean, look at all the other media where women are in control of depicting women. From cosmo, to mommy porn to reality tv. Women are doing a bang up job. I think us guys should just i…
/r/MensRights06/07/13 03:05 PM
11

Meh, it is r/gaming. They can brigade all they want, guys know the truth... and as of yet, my posts are doing just fine in there.
/r/MensRights06/07/13 02:59 PM
71

"That is not what women want to be!" I think there are an awful lot of plastic surgeons who would say that that is exactly what women want to be... as they count all their boob job money.
/r/MensRights06/07/13 02:58 PM
-1

The laws in Texas are nothing but a speed bump. They won't put them out of business, they will just temporarily close them while the needed upgrades are installed. You can be damn sure the women's groups and abortion proponents will flood grant money in to help with the needed upgrades. On the whole, this won't effect abortions long term. Doctors will get hours at a hospital within 30 mins of their clinic, and that will be that. There are actually very few parts of texas that are habitable that …
/r/MensRights06/07/13 10:44 AM
1

It is. As long as 1 person in the conversation is aware of a recording is in progress, texas allows it. Also, he should check out legal aid if she hasn't already... will help either side, but not both, in cases of financial troubles, otherwise get a lawyer. Also, isn't the observing family member there when he picks up and drops off the kid... to give testimony as to the inappropriate touching. Sorry you attached yourself to crazy OP.
/r/MensRights06/07/13 10:38 AM
2

Because the best male athletes in the US play Football or Basketball, usually. Something you notice about american HS male athletes, when it comes to soccer is a disproportionate number of shorter players. Height is often an advantage in sports, but is especially advantageous in FB and BB, so soccer teams are mostly comprised of shorter guys that couldn't make either of those teams. It isn't a knock on soccer or the athletes, just something I have noticed. Usually the best female athletes go int…
/r/MensRights05/07/13 08:36 AM
2

Drawn boobs = patriarchal abuse of women.
/r/MensRights05/07/13 02:13 AM
0

This will be buried or ignored. Unfortunately.
/r/MensRights05/07/13 02:09 AM
25

At least until they repeal it because boys start taking all the spots in softball and volleyball, traditional female sports where male power and speed will win them the coveted spots and take most of the sport out of the reach of the typical female. Some girls will be able to compete at the same level, but not many, and when the brigade gets in here with the downvotes, it won't change anything. Men are faster, stronger and have more power and ups. For every soccer playing girl that will be good …
/r/MensRights05/07/13 02:04 AM
21

That is not hate. Hate is very specific. It might be sexist, it might be crass, it might be racism, but it is not hate. Hate is not low expectation, it is intense admonition/hostility. This over exaggeration is why you always so blatantly fail. Your only comments are always hyperbolic injustices for you to whine over. Guess what Grapeban? In every country on earth, there are not many women in tech, and thus not many women with intense tech skills. Breaking news. That right there is actually a fa…
/r/MensRights04/07/13 08:50 PM
24

When the numbers of deaths for women were low to begin with, not really. For perspective, male deaths increased ~270% in that time, and that means the increase in male death was numerically higher than the increase in womens... there is a reason they used % instead of real number increases. Women went from ~1650 deaths a year to ~6500, men went from ~3600 to ~10000 It is just not as shocking seeing it this way.
/r/MensRights04/07/13 11:40 AM
1

There is no blood/genetic test, but as long as she had access to vinegar, she can test him for hpv. http://www.webmd.com/sexual-conditions/hpv-genital-warts/hpv-virus-men
/r/MensRights04/07/13 11:10 AM
6

Because having a penis doesn't make me disposable, someone else's meal ticket, a criminal, a pedophile, a rapist, or less worthy of help.
/r/MensRights04/07/13 11:06 AM
3

"There’s nothing to anguish about here. The closer to home news gets, the more women will know about it. Why is it so hard to admit that men and women are equal in value but different in function?" Because to do so would unravel the feminist narrative
/r/MensRights04/07/13 10:44 AM
10

this is how you lose elections
/r/MensRights04/07/13 10:27 AM
1

The wedding is an exercise in stroking the females vanity. It is all about one thing... everyone standing up, turning around, and looking at the bride. That is their shining moment. And that is all a wedding is. Looking at the divorce rate, it sure as hell is not a promise to stay married... where women file 70% of the time.
/r/MensRights04/07/13 06:33 AM
1

I wonder why that is? Is it because no where near 100% of women are in favor of abortion? Here is a little secret. Women are the majority electorate in every state in the US. The reason abortion is still in flux all this time later is because feminists made the worst mistake possible and sold abortion as a women only issue, and men should "butt" out. Well get this. That is exactly what men did. Abortion is not a voting issue to men in the US. It is not in their top 20. And your feminist sisters …
/r/MensRights04/07/13 06:18 AM
1

Yeah, but radical feminism isn't happening in the old world, it is happening in the 1st world, the world where the old goals have been met.
/r/MensRights04/07/13 06:11 AM
1

Images in the media. You mean those images that say all men and dads are idiots and are just going to screw up anything they attempt, while all moms and women know best, are smarter, are more capable, and are constantly correcting dads/his mistakes. What you seem to be recalling is the media in a bygone day. It isn't women portrayed in the media as out to kidnap your kid, out to rape any chance and any where, out to kill you every step you take. Men are both all the boogeymen and butt of every j…
/r/MensRights04/07/13 05:59 AM
3

I don't think these women understand which state they are in. It is Texas. There are plenty of women here (probably more than are not) happy about the legislation. This will be a losing proposition for them. Their beau's will just find new, less my way or the highway, girls. And they will become even more embittered. Sounds like a win, win to me. Maybe legislation like this will finally prove that they can't go it alone, and will have to entice males to care about abortion by giving them the rig…
/r/MensRights03/07/13 03:48 AM
2

That one is too dumb to understand the national electorate does not = individual state electorate.
/r/MensRights02/07/13 10:35 AM
2

Yeah, someone does not understand the difference between state and federal governments. Also, that places like Ohio and Texas, more women vote for republicans for state office than democrats.
/r/MensRights02/07/13 10:31 AM
3

Well, no, I don't think he is formally on the bandwagon, but 3 months ago, neither was I. That being said, my views aligned with those of the MRA's, and imo, his do to. Does he carry a banner? Of course not. Does he voice the same frustrations we do? No doubt. I don't think one has to be or have ever even heard of the MRA, to be an activist for men's issues.
/r/MensRights02/07/13 09:19 AM
1

This is my stock answer: Do you want to know why abortion is always in flux. Because feminists were extremely stupid and made abortion a women only issue thinking that doing so would secure the votes necessary to protect it. Problem is, women are no where close to 100% in support of it, and since the majority of men don't vote based on it, it will always be in flux. It is too late in the game to try and get men to care about abortion... that ship has sailed. It is not a top 20 issue for them and…
/r/MensRights02/07/13 08:37 AM
2

Actually it wont. It does allow abortions. Up until the heartbeat. The supreme court has never determined when life begins. That is the angle they are attacking. It has never been decided when life begins, and the supreme court has always sidestepped that question. As long as the legislation leaves provisions that take into account cases where the mothers life is in danger, the SCOTUS has nothing yet to say on the issue. It will be challenged for sure, but there is no precedent to just immediate…
/r/MensRights02/07/13 08:31 AM
6

Bill Burr
/r/MensRights02/07/13 08:23 AM
6

I am cool with both sexes having 'safe spaces'. Problem is, women are not. What male private club exists that hasn't been picketed/shamed by radical fems and doesn't exist under a cloud of suspicion? Guys are not allowed to have them anymore. That, I think, is why there is so much blowback about women trying to sanitize or feminize videogames. It is one of the last refuges where guys can just be guys without having to censor their behavior as to not offend. What women don't understand is guys ar…
/r/MensRights02/07/13 08:21 AM
12

The point is, all the dangerous jobs just seem to be predominately employers of men. That men are 90% of all workplace fatalities. That there is a reason a hot spot firefighter gets paid more than a childcare worker. Because they might die, instead of just being spit up on.
/r/MensRights02/07/13 07:53 AM
11

"These men don't have to ever have heard of the MRM to be doing this." This is something I came up with more than a decade ago. I just heard about the MRM 3 months ago. They know. They are pissed. And, of course, they blame us instead of themselves and the rules they keep in place to make marriage and children a risk not worth the reward. I have worked hard to get what I have, and while I still date and have medium-long term relationships... they inevitably fall apart when the women realize I ha…
/r/MensRights02/07/13 12:54 AM
18

This is where you are wrong. I am mid 30's, good looking, fit, educated, have my own business... and have relationships until women begin demanding I take care of them, then I upgrade to a new model without those defects. There is a whole slew of women pissed at me. I am not a PUA. I want companionship. I do not want dependency, and I make this clear from the get go... but they think they can change me, like they think they can change every guy. The point is, it isn't just those women reject tha…
/r/MensRights02/07/13 12:47 AM
4

"I don't see a problem here, except for the reality that critiquing weight is a major no no in our society!" And boy is that doing wonders for the obesity and diabetes rates in our society
/r/MensRights02/07/13 12:37 AM
-4

Male politicians are voted for by their constituents, a constituency where women always outnumber men and vote for more men than they do women. This is a fact people like you always omit. Women vote for men more than they do women. Women are the majority voting demographic. In every country where there is not a quota system, and actual choice is the determining factor, men far exceed women in political office. And women are always the largest voting bloc in these situation. Equal opportunity is …
/r/MensRights02/07/13 12:20 AM
26

lol, it is always a scorched earth policy with you
/r/MensRights01/07/13 09:23 AM
1

if you have ghostery or such, you have to turn it off.
/r/MensRights01/07/13 09:02 AM
7

Of course she did. It was the 1st post that used any form of logic instead of just feels. She had to shut it down at that point because a stick had just been thrown in between her front spokes and the tale she spun was about to make her face plant if anyone else commented on those rules rules of the road. Why didn't she just pull over and let him pass if she was so afraid. If he was out to get her, he would have gotten her, not kept pace with her while for as long as he did.
/r/MensRights01/07/13 08:21 AM
3

Yeah, I know. Women play the sims, and farmville, and the mmorpgs... none of which are considered 'core' gaming. People who go to lans almost overwhelmingly are 'core' gamers... which means they play FPS,RPG, or RTS's... There are more girls playing them... i'd say 10-15%... but they don't represent at these events. Most of the girls there are young girls whose dads brought them or girlfriends that looked pissed their boyfriends did. I wish there were more girl gamers at these things, but they r…
/r/MensRights01/07/13 07:52 AM
1

from the article in question "he thriving gaming culture in Sweden – which hosts DreamHack, the biggest LAN party in the world – is expected to be struck hard by the decision. Video games, too, are included under the new authorization. ”In the eyes of the law, these are slot machines. There is no difference,” Johan Röhr, general counsel at the Gambling Board, told the computer magazine M3." Now, if as it says, anyone connecting 26 or more computers together for any kind of gaming, not just gambl…
/r/MensRights01/07/13 07:47 AM
0

That depends on the lan, and whether there are fees... and any lan I have ever been to that had fees, only had them for people who brought their computers... and if the event organizer is charged a new fee, you can bet they pass it on to the paying customers, which would in this case be guys, who bring their computer.
/r/MensRights01/07/13 07:26 AM
12

That right there is what you call a sex addict. It is someone who treats sex like a drug fix. To most guys, it sounds wonderful at first... and if you are new to sex or whatever, it is for a while. But then 2-3 month later, when she is still wanting 2 or 3 a days... well, damn... you begin to wonder what the hell you have gotten yourself into. The diagnosis is, you have gotten your self into crazy, and better figure a way to get yourself out. Because, there is a such thing as too much sex. When …
/r/MensRights01/07/13 07:10 AM
-1

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DreamHack Attendees' ages range from elementary school to senior citizens, though the average age is 16-17. Ten percent are female, though this figure is old and appears to have risen since[citation needed]. People arrive from all over the world to participate. Best I can find... and that is attendee's, which just counts everyone that comes in to walk around. I specifically said "people who bring their computers" which would likely be a lower number than the maybe 20…
/r/MensRights01/07/13 06:50 AM
-1

You can't find me a giant crowd of girls from that event and we both know it. We will just have to agree to disagree. High five on this comment though. http://www.reddit.com/r/TwoXChromosomes/comments/1g6194/in_light_of_e3_can_we_talk_about_the_gaming/cahzdfw truth is, guys are dicks to everyone in gaming. We are sexist to guys and girls and are asses to guys and girls. Girls just are not used to how guys treat each other.
/r/MensRights01/07/13 06:44 AM
0

Everyone pays sales tax, guys get their hair cut too. You will have to find something that is a tax that is not general (all products sold get a vat/sales tax, or a service)... This is a new tax, that will predominately affect only men. Find me one of those for women. This is neither a service or a product... all of those have taxes.
/r/MensRights01/07/13 06:41 AM
-1

I am not sure this tax is meant t hurt males, but there is no doubt who will overwhelmingly be paying this tax. I wonder,are there taxes there that overwhelmingly target women?
/r/MensRights01/07/13 06:18 AM
-2

Still waiting on all your evidence women comprise 50% below...I have provided a lot of crowd shots, all backing my view...and you have provided zilch...
/r/MensRights01/07/13 06:16 AM
2

http://cult.razerzone.com/tag/lan-party/ here is even more pictures that only strengthen my view... sure are a lot of males... rare to see females. Waiting on your evidence to the contrary... and no focused shot. An event of 10k people, saying "look, there is 3 girls sitting together" means nothing. I want crowd shots. All the ones of crowds I see are 95% dudes, which strangely enough is just what I said. I haven't seen a photo yet that made me think 5000 girls were there... not even close. Show…
/r/MensRights01/07/13 05:51 AM
1

Well, actual pictures showing a 20-1 ratio... what would that be... around 95% male? Why don't your prove otherwise? I showed you what pictures exist of an event you trumped up as being 50/50, being anything but.
/r/MensRights01/07/13 05:40 AM
-1

http://www.dreamhack.se/dhs13/ unfortunately, they don't post many pics, but of the pictures they do have I see all of 2 girls, and one of them is a presenter. Girls attend these things, but in my experience, they don't bring their computers... and those are the people who will have to pay the tax. Also, of the 1 shot on that page that shows the lan, I can distinguish a lot of guys, and not a single girl sitting at the computers. You would think if it was 50/50 as you say, I could at least disti…
/r/MensRights01/07/13 05:34 AM
1

Because lan gamers are 95% or higher male (these are the hardcore of the hardcore, not casual gamers...They are almost all male, I go to these things, and while girls will attend, they do not bring their computers). It would be like adding a tax to pole dance lessons... would be a tax targeting women.
/r/MensRights01/07/13 05:24 AM
0

From what I have read, it was really just packaged out of the divorce proceedings so that the divorce would be concluded. It ain't over yet. Though she did have to pay her own lawyer fees for the divorce. I am sure it will get upheld though in the separate case.
/r/MensRights01/07/13 05:21 AM
3

They can't kiss each other in public, but make no mistake, indians are just as sold from sex as anyone else. Ever seen a bollywood movie?
/r/MensRights01/07/13 05:11 AM
19

I imagine the prevalence of unlimited internet porn has changed things. When I get turned down, no worries, I can go squeeze one out with every body shape I could imagine at the touch of a button. That has enabled guys to get that pleasure other times too, and forego all of the hoops our SO's might make us jump through. Looks like the game has changed, and well, girls will just have to adapt to the new rules... us guys have options... and their hoops are not always worth it.
/r/MensRights01/07/13 05:05 AM
94

Here is the thing, when I am tired, we can't have sex. Because women expect me to do all the work. I am tired, get it. And no matter what you women say, about how you will get on top and do all the work... it is a lie. You will start on top and then begin to mope, because you are having to do all the work. And then mope more, because me being tired really must mean I do not find you attractive, or do not love you or what ever other stupid insecurity you make up in your head to torture yourself. …
/r/MensRights01/07/13 04:54 AM
6

The rules of the road are so patriachy
/r/MensRights01/07/13 04:46 AM
-3

LOL, Michael Jackson was such a pioneer. Though I guess, by looking at the kids, he just flat out bought them as his only contribution was money.
/r/MensRights30/06/13 10:33 PM
0

Meh, ~ 25-30% of women oppose abortion... and they are the ones with the control. The problem isn't that men oppose abortion. It is that women have made abortion a women's only issue. And as we are seeing around the US, that is to their own detriment. Abortion is just not a voting issue for the vast majority of men. It is not a deal breaker on a candidate. If you agree with them on many other issues, most men decide that "meh, abortion is a woman's problem". And thus abortion is always under thr…
/r/MensRights30/06/13 10:28 PM
1

I love how when women are destroyed with a fact that they cannot counter they both raise their voice in volume and pitch. I call it the wicked witch of the west syndrome.
/r/MensRights30/06/13 10:20 PM
3

Calling the cops is actually the safest bet. They would have a recording of you reporting a lost child and at what time. And at least around here it would only be a couple of minutes at most for a patrol car to get to you. They handle it from there.
/r/MensRights30/06/13 10:09 PM
1

He means you get tax breaks for having a kid.
/r/MensRights30/06/13 10:07 PM
8

They just start screaming and calling you names.
/r/MensRights30/06/13 09:01 PM
8

South Park gets it. Couldn't help but laugh at this cartman line, though. "Whats to understand. You get a boner, slap her titties around some and then stick it inside her and pee".
/r/MensRights30/06/13 04:45 AM
1

Yeah, dude, those bitches be wasting their time in here, brigading. They cannot win the argument, though they try, so they go whining like, well, little girls for downvotes... Do you think popularity, or perceived popularity like karma means something to them? I am not ruled by it. It is just a barometer of my view to me... and obvious brigading by the fempire doesn't effect me. It makes me feel sorry for them. They are putting a lot more effort into this than me. I have my opinion and ability t…
/r/MensRights29/06/13 08:38 PM
12

This guy is a madman. He must be stopped. How dare he hold a sign on federal property. Evil! I can't tell, but he stopped in 2010... did he finally get rights to see his son?
/r/MensRights29/06/13 12:32 PM
1

I would break gaming down into several caveats. FPS are what really pushed graphics forward, because of carmac and id/doom then HL then COD and are mainly bought by the under 30's (though I will still buy HL3 if Gabe will ever let me and I am near 40). Because they are the most popular with the under 30, they require the most ad revenue, and thus seem to have the most influence. They do make a ton, as a genre, but they are also completely over-saturated segment with the least advances. RPGs have…
/r/MensRights29/06/13 12:20 PM
0

99.999% of the people in the US won't play there either. I'd like to though. Sure is pretty on TV. Women get all kinds of "women only spaces" so I ignore their whining about it. If they feel left out, open their own. I promise men won't petition to get in. Do you think that pisses them off even more. That we don't want to go into their hen fests?
/r/MensRights29/06/13 11:38 AM
1

That guy that got maced in the store sure could have used a pool nearby to throw his assailant into. We need more pools!
/r/MensRights29/06/13 11:26 AM
1

As someone else said, unless it is a membership store, whereupon entering you have given up some of your rights a store cannot stop you or search you without cause. Simple having a "policy" does not overcome your rights, at least not in the states. At a walmart, or best buy or frys I always smile and say no thank you when they ask to search any of my stuff and walk on by. In cases of actual theft, you will be held up at the door... but in those cases people would be closing in around you, as you…
/r/MensRights29/06/13 11:15 AM
3

We care
/r/MensRights29/06/13 10:59 AM
3

Made up stories don't hurt us. You have to look at the big picture. And in the big picture, that is completely meaningless. Remember, these places that would publish these stories are never used by people whose minds we would change. These made up stories should get the reaction they are getting from us. That is the legitimate MR view on those subjects. Who cares if jezebel or gawker circlejerk over it. Watch the sub numbers here. Everyday they grow. And we are not the only ones seeing that. Hav…
/r/MensRights29/06/13 10:41 AM
3

The key word is "attempting". No one here is permissive, per se. Just not flummoxed by it. DV them, and wait for the mods to clean it up. They have been doing it for years, and we keep growing. Don't let them get you down, stay on message, and we win. We win more than them every day and that fills them with this troll rage. Thing about trolls, though, is they really don't believe in their cause, but we believe in ours. Which is why we win, and they troll. They throw fits and tantrums and we dish…
/r/MensRights29/06/13 10:34 AM
3

There is nothing bad in this thread and even if it is a troll post, we don't look bad, and they just look pathetic. So it is a win/win. The more they feel the need to troll, the more our message gets through. So some immature kids waste their time making themselves look bad to the majority of readers so they can think they are accomplishing something when they are not... where is the negative for us? This isn't my team. MR isn't like feminism, an indoctrination, it is just good sense. All the tr…
/r/MensRights29/06/13 10:21 AM
2

So will the 70k+ other subscribers, much to the chagrin of srs/amr/and other useless trolls who look at their subscriber numbers, then ours, and whimper and feel themselves with troll rage because they are losing, badly. Was downvoted into oblivion just today in such a thread. When the brigade hits, it really hits. I love it when they resort to name calling. That is how you know you are winning. It is evidence they have just been hit with mental kryptonite. Can't win the argument so they explode…
/r/MensRights29/06/13 10:14 AM
-5

Ohh, name calling. You must feel really certain about your argument. That is why people resort to calling names, incapable of breaking the argument at hand. Pregnancy is a natural result to sex. Thus, sex is really the danger. Don't want the risk of death, don't have sex... or better yet, USE PROTECTION... it is available everywhere, and what responsible people do. Pregnancy must not be that dangerous considering the world is woefully overpopulated. Do you know what else is dangerous? Being aliv…
/r/MensRights29/06/13 02:50 AM
-5

You should play some games. You will get them daily. Maybe post a youtube video. My guess is you are too busy white knighting. Strange you wouldn't have seen it "bro".
/r/MensRights29/06/13 02:21 AM
-3

Hmm, I get 'rape' threats every day. Welcome to men's world. I thought you wanted to be treated as equals. What you don't seem to realize is that men say much harsher things to men. TIL women cannot distinguish between internet threats and real threats. No wonder they believe in "rape culture" when statistically rapes are less likely than they have ever been in ever. Must be why they keep changing the definition of rape.
/r/MensRights29/06/13 02:08 AM
-1

Where did I do that? Few if any are... Some are not sanitized specifically for women. But that is nowhere near the same as hostile.
/r/MensRights29/06/13 02:02 AM
-3

Oh, I am so sorry the world is so hard for you poor women. I thought you were strong and capable. Do you want us men to protect you? Are you not capable of ignoring things, or going elsewhere? Do people on the internet hurt your feelings? I am so sorry. Does the internet wilt you little delicate flowers? Do you need to ban some more speech because of the feels? Is everyplace not catered just for you? Poor girls.
/r/MensRights29/06/13 01:52 AM
-5

Why wouldn't it be. It is one of the top 5 online social hotspots, and, moreover, a male centric one. It is like the girl magazine rack for guys. A place to both be proud of, and a resource for growth... much to your chagrin I am sure.
/r/MensRights29/06/13 01:32 AM
-6

medically speaking, it is medically necessary to restore function. Abortion is only medically necessary to save the life of the mother in rare cases, otherwise, it is a choice only for social or personal reasons. Restoring penile function is as medically necessary as countering osteoporosis with drugs as both are due to the breakdown of the body to function normally.
/r/MensRights29/06/13 01:28 AM
-4

"Abortions and Viagra both are elective, and both completely unnecessary." And this is where you don't seem to get it. Abortions can be medically necessary just as viagra is. Viagra restores functionality, abortions can save the mother life. Both are deemed medically necessary. Women can choose to ignore a doctors order and men can choose to not take viagra, but medically speaking, both are considered necessary under the proper conditions. Abortion for choice is medically possible, not medically…
/r/MensRights29/06/13 12:40 AM
-9

Sorry sweetheart, but that is not how it goes. Plenty of men in their 70's and 80's have penis' that work perfectly fine without viagra. And there is a millennium's worth of proof on the subject. The penis is meant to work, and viagra can restore that functionality. I will say, however, that much like abortions, viagra is overprescribed. Many men misuse it Abortion is the choice to end a perfectly normal body process. It is medical only if the pregnancy threatens the life of the mother if carrie…
/r/MensRights29/06/13 12:30 AM
0

Just so you know, the laws don't make abortion illegal, they make abortion clinics have to meet surgical standards (something that vasectomy clinics already meet, btw... and tell you the truth I would be shocked and looking elsewhere if they didn't) and make RU486 (Which is the abortion pill, and though unlikely has been shown to cause hemorrhaging) only able to be prescribed by an obgyn. This law will temporarily limit the number of clinics as they retrofit to surgical standards, and while that…
/r/MensRights29/06/13 12:19 AM
-12

Reddit takes us seriously, you know this place YOU post at daily, it seems... one of the highest and fastest subbed groups here (much higher than any groups against us). Erectile dysfunction is not more important than pregnancy, but it certainly is not due to sexual irresponsibility, where as 90+% of abortions are.
/r/MensRights29/06/13 12:04 AM
-8

Umm, one is the body functioning as it was meant to function, the other is a loss of function. Ending a pregnancy is rarely done for medical reason. It happens, but only accounts for 2-3% of abortions. While pregnancy (checkups, nutrition) is a medical issue, aborting the baby because "I like, totally am not ready for this" is a choice that requires medical attention to achieve, and preventable. The vast, vast majority of abortions are due to irresponsibility during sex, not the body functioning…
/r/MensRights28/06/13 11:52 PM
0

"but there's gotta be some reason the Patriarchy is behind this." Because those who lose mobility are apt to wither and die more quickly and men are disposable. A "final solution" if you will.
/r/MensRights28/06/13 11:44 PM
2

50% vs 33% isn't enough of a difference in my head to fuck the men over in price... at least not with a straight face.
/r/MensRights28/06/13 11:42 PM
2

no alimony in texas, but unless she is batshit crazy (and this one appears to be) you still won't get your kids.
/r/MensRights28/06/13 11:34 PM
-2

I have a feeling with recording devices being literally everywhere, this 1970's idea of child pornography that was based on it being hard to capture these images will have to change. We are literally a decade or so away from houses with all room video capturing capability built in during construction... hell, wall paper will eventually have it. If you are of an age where you can have sex with someone, you are of an age where someone filming it with permission should not have that haunt them for …
/r/MensRights28/06/13 01:18 PM
-2

LOL, most 16 year olds are doing it to themselves. To say that there is any real expectation of maturity difference between a 16 year old and a 20 year old is as absurd as your lack of sympathy.
/r/MensRights28/06/13 12:30 PM
1

Salary options are identical to both. Men just choose to have less benefits, women choose better benefits. Cost to the employer is the same, in some cases men might get paid slightly more, but they are costing the employer less in insurance, time off without productivity etc... Just saying men and women should make same dollar amount is absurd, as it only equates dollars as pay, when all of those benefits = pay to the employer. Cost of employee is what matters, and study after study after study …
/r/MensRights28/06/13 12:24 PM
37

I have been well conditioned that women can handle themselves without my help. I see women in need all the time and just look at them thinking to myself... you got that.
/r/MensRights27/06/13 04:06 PM
16

Yeah, american beauty was about a lot of things, and spacey did not follow through with his seduction, and like you said, movie watchers were not celebrating his seduction, we celebrated his choice not to. Same with Lolita. He was not celebrated. He was shown to be an emotionally stunted creep. There are tons of women centric movies that celebrate the seduction of an underaged/immature boy. I can't think of any movies that celebrate when men do it.
/r/MensRights26/06/13 11:32 PM
9

This article is on a subject that is a year old. Why are they even discussing it?
/r/MensRights26/06/13 11:20 PM
1

do you have kids? If so, does your wife also work or are you single? For single people I think 4x10 sounds great, pretty good for workers with stay at homes... but it sounds like hell dealing with childcare/ and all the other things one has to do with children in households where both parents have to work that shift or a single mother or father with kids. That is less actual time during the week to see them for what only amounts to 3 or 4 extra hours on friday, assuming they are in school. It is…
/r/MensRights26/06/13 09:13 AM
12

(1937) Marijuana causes madness http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Azf320JDdqU (1954) comic books cause violence http://www.psu.edu/dept/inart10_110/inart10/cmbk4cca.html (1970')Hard rock causes violence (i especially liked this one, there were more seemingly reputable sources, but this wins the lulls... poor headbanging mice) http://www.relfe.com/hard_rock.html (early 1980s)D&D creates murderers, occultists and wiccans oh my http://www.chick.com/articles/dnd.asp (late 1980's) violence in movies cau…
/r/MensRights26/06/13 08:37 AM
1

Expect family lawyers to lobby hard against this. A good portion of their billable hours comes from custody regardless of what some douches who do AMA's say.
/r/MensRights25/06/13 08:36 PM
5

I imagine if you have kids, you would notice not seeing the 2 hours less 4 days a week, if you really even got to see them conscience at all. This idea is relative to kids, having them. I think for single people, 4x10 would work out great... but with people with kids, especially dual working parents or single parents, this would just be more headaches and hassles, from securing more childcare to demolishing what little time parents have with their kids during the week.
/r/MensRights25/06/13 08:27 PM
2

So, you give up 8 hours during the week with your children, in a general sense 9-7 daily, add in commutes and possible 8a-8p daily, and you have increased your childcare costs (maybe they would change how it is formulated, but the ones I know charge extra for after hours care, if you can find them at all), dinner with smaller kids would be made all but impossible (little ones usually go to sleep around 9ish) to gain 1 day which sounds great, but you are most likely now exhausted on that day and …
/r/MensRights25/06/13 08:21 PM
4

Feel even more justified calling him a "cocky douche". To say that family practice lawyers do not benefit from drawing out cases and conflicts, and I was talking out my ass for saying his answers were suspect... effing douche.
/r/MensRights24/06/13 10:39 AM
5

There is a difference between personal greed and institutional greed. There is no doubt feminism is institutionally greedy. They want money for their causes everyone else be damned, and if statistic here or there need to be flubbed or misrepresented... well, are you really saying that is not common. The story here is that a feminist falsified rape statistics to gain public funding.
/r/MensRights24/06/13 07:16 AM
-2

Sorry, your posts are the ones that scream 'still lives in moms basement', the only thing I have posted in this argument were facts and.. well, I own my own house... and have no basement. Pats little troll on the head. Now go get your shinebox.
/r/MensRights24/06/13 03:19 AM
-1

If any of my responses to you count as a temper tantrum I think you have lived one cloistered life.
/r/MensRights24/06/13 03:13 AM
6

I think she would have been better off saying something like "no one likes bossy, control freaks". If my girl wants to mow the lawn, I got no problem laying on the couch and watching how its made or golf while dozing. But if she demands I do it, on her timetable, and her way... we are both about to have some problems.
/r/MensRights24/06/13 02:55 AM
-3

So, it isn't in his financial interests for court cases to add as many billable hours as possible, and lawyers are not the ones who lobby most against laws that make divorce more equitable? Go away little child.
/r/MensRights24/06/13 02:32 AM
-4

Then you should really learn to control how you end your answers. "Also, we divorce lawyers make plenty of money off of equitable and amicable splits (Separation and Property Settlement Agreements what what). So your argument sucks and you've just been lawyered. Peace." I believe a jury would agree a cocky douche wrote those words.
/r/MensRights23/06/13 10:35 PM
6

Hating feminism is not the same as hating women or femininity. I love women, especially soft skinned, good smelling feminine ones, who are smart and articulate. Unfortunately, most are brainwashed that Feminism=women, when in reality feminism is nothing more than a social movement.
/r/MensRights23/06/13 10:33 PM
10

Uhh, he grew up in the entertainment world. Most people really just like Will because he is not a complete ass. Still doesn't mean his mind was not warped. Example: I love Beck. I have been to a ton of his concerts and traveled to see him preform. He is a scientologist. That breaks my heart. Still like him, though.
/r/MensRights23/06/13 10:27 PM
-5

Not concerned. I am fairly certain most other will agree he began this, not me. That I point out he is a cocky douche lawyer? Are you butthurt because you are one too?
/r/MensRights23/06/13 10:12 PM
-8

Where did I say or imply that? Cocky douche lawyer ends his answer to a reasonable, non offensive question with "Also, we divorce lawyers make plenty of money off of equitable and amicable splits (Separation and Property Settlement Agreements what what). So your argument sucks and you've just been lawyered. Peace." to which I use his own words to point out he himself is scraping by. It is not in his best interest as a lawyer for laws that make splits equitable to be predetermined. Litigation and…
/r/MensRights23/06/13 10:07 PM
-1

" I barely get by month to month and I charge $125-$200 per hour" http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1gwvd2/i_am_a_divorce_lawyer_ama/caoofmk
/r/MensRights23/06/13 09:57 PM
-3

You do so well, you are barely scraping by month to month, huh? That is called a lawyer having his own words open a can on himself. Predetermined equitable law does away with much of the need of lawyers. When there is little room for litigation, there is little room for you. And I think most would agree, a world with less need of lawyers is a better world indeed.
/r/MensRights23/06/13 09:48 PM
2

Works out pretty well for the lawyers, though, huh? Don't take this the wrong way. But you must see that many of the things you say are suspect, because the more fighting and litigation between the spouses, means the more money for you. Would it be wrong to assume that a divorce lawyer has little interest in a system that would spell out equitable splits before marriage, ie laws that do away with permanent alimony, or mandate equal child custody except under extenuating circumstances. It sure lo…
/r/MensRights23/06/13 09:36 PM
13

Hmm... had she simply said "If there are less women in the workforce in the US, and 40% of households in the US have women as their top earner, there must not really be a wage gap" she would have been booed off the stage... but logically, some of those young girls whom I presume are the main viewers of such tripe, might have learned some mental kryptonite to counter the feminist propaganda they would soon be inundated with.
/r/MensRights23/06/13 05:34 AM
1

The word you mean to use is speculation. Conspiracy, as you are using it, would mean a criminal intent, and nothing criminal is happening here for Misterdamage to comment on. He is simply speculating what could have occurred.
/r/MensRights22/06/13 08:30 PM
4

That doesn't go with his theme. The problem in Africa, is that these circumcisions are all happening with consent. They are fighting a campaign of men doing this to themselves.
/r/MensRights22/06/13 08:22 PM
1

The ones I have seen show a reduction of ~60% during heterosexual sex. Where is your .5% coming from? "The results showed that circumcision reduced vaginal-to-penile transmission of HIV by 60%, 53%, and 51%, respectively." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circumcision_and_HIV
/r/MensRights22/06/13 08:16 PM
1

lol, sounds to me BC, Canada just created a need to 'trade up' every 1.5 years.
/r/MensRights21/06/13 06:01 AM
9

We can't have 1 out of 3 rapes being committed by women. That really diminishes the supposed rape culture in males.
/r/MensRights21/06/13 05:50 AM
2

Or a man charging a woman with rape because he told her not to get pregnant.
/r/MensRights20/06/13 07:36 AM
3

No one here was raped, and she willingly had sex with a man without a condom. Had she said no sex without a condom and he forced her to have sex anyway, no one here would be siding with him. But that is not the case, and you are just grasping at straws. There is also that problem of sex being for an orgasm, and sometimes orgasms just happen unexpectedly early. The moral of this story is not to have sex without a condom if you are afraid of ejaculate. That is the line between rape, and just a rea…
/r/MensRights20/06/13 07:27 AM
4

shhh. It is very, very damaging to a woman's psyche, to point out to them that they are walking lies. But just for fun: Makeup, fake hair color, hair extensions, padded/lift bras, heels, fake tan, fake boobs, slimming underwear... and that is just a Wednesday morning. The funny thing is, I am willing to bet many of these "regret" accusations of rape come after they see the guy they were with's response to them the next morning in the sunlight when he realizes what is in his bed is not what he re…
/r/MensRights20/06/13 07:09 AM
1

I think when it comes to 13 year old's and bullying, the facts are clear on this matter. And yet, we treat young boys like demons.
/r/MensRights18/06/13 06:45 PM
5

It is simple really... women are the majority voting bloc in the country, if they are not being elected to the senate, it is because women are not voting for women to be senators. Equal opportunity does not mean equal outcome. Women have all the skills necessary to become CEO's and Board Members at fortune 500's. To do that, women must do what men have always had to do. Marry their work. From the time they graduate college, work 80 hours a week for at least 30 years and make their job their 1st-…
/r/MensRights17/06/13 11:57 PM
1

The climate is still not conducive enough for you not to be destroyed if you are outed as a MRA, so the internet is the perfect place as it is much harder for radfems threatened by our use of logic to doxx us. In time,(and it is happening, look at the millennials rejecting feminism) the climate will allow actual open debate on the subject. Might still be a while, especially if Hillary is elected. She wears her hatred of men on her suit jackets, lol.
/r/MensRights17/06/13 11:48 PM
1

you could have just added vs paid paternity
/r/MensRights17/06/13 11:41 PM
1

No it is not fair. It is a privilege that men get to only take off a week or two to the mothers 3 months. I mean, what guy would want to be around his newborn when there is so much work he could be doing. End this male privilege of getting to work more, or better yet, only allow women 2 weeks so they too can enjoy the privilege of more work and less baby time!
/r/MensRights17/06/13 11:37 PM
1

TL:DR men can take criticism and jokes better than women.
/r/MensRights17/06/13 11:30 PM
2

Is this not part of the fucking article? If that is one of her provisions necessary to get feminist approval, and we all know without feminist approval there will never be paper abortions, doesn't it make the whole fucking proposal not worth the paper it is written on?
/r/MensRights14/06/13 07:47 AM
2

•If the court determines you were abusive to your ex, all the above is invalidated and you will pay child support with no visitation rights if the judge so determines. I don't know how you do not see this provision as a problem. In divorce/custody cases now, if the woman lies and says he beat her for leverage, the court believes her.
/r/MensRights14/06/13 06:27 AM
1

lets not, please
/r/MensRights14/06/13 06:04 AM
5

Yeah, that is the ultimate "get out of jail free" card. He signed off, huh? Well, I will just say he beat me
/r/MensRights14/06/13 05:45 AM
19

"the main people who get action on the dating scene are the ignorant men an women" Not the enlightened men and women that the author knows, who are all progressive feminists, and pissed that no one is asking them out or too scared to ask someone out due to the climate they have created... no, it is the 'ignorant' who haven't bought into feminist bullshit and are responding to those 'ignorant' innate urges... stupid, stupid, stupid. He and his enlightened friends deserve the years ahead with cats…
/r/MensRights14/06/13 03:53 AM
7

Take 'farmville ' and the like out of the equation, and those numbers are cut dramatically. Guys are the vast majority of purchasers of AAA money titles that account for most of the profits in gaming... women mostly buy cheap mobile or play free social games while riding the train.
/r/MensRights12/06/13 11:11 PM
1

LOL. Yeah, women don't seem to realize that men actually do talk less shit to them than they do other men. The problem for women is, the shit they talk about each other is behind that other persons back. Rarely are they upfront about it. Guys are practicing it from day one. And we use kid gloves with women compared to what we say to guys. Women would suicide for the feels if they really felt the brunt that men lay on each other. That Sarkiseen (sp?) or dongle gate girl think they were treated un…
/r/MensRights12/06/13 10:54 PM
3

Just more reason not to buy their console. Maybe all the 'feminist gamer's' they are obviously so keen to court with their feckless apologies will make up for the huge losses of core gamer's they face this round. LOL, though I certainly wouldn't hold my breath if I were M$
/r/MensRights12/06/13 10:49 PM
1

Lung cancer is the leading cause of death by cancer in both men and women.
/r/MensRights12/06/13 10:41 PM
3

I know guys who played with dolls and played house as children. If I were to ask a fashion question, about which color goes with which... or if this looks good with this, it is not those guys I am asking. The reason, is, because while they may have played with dolls as a kid, that did not transfer into them reading Cosmo and other fashion magazines as adults. I wouldn't look down on them for doing it, i just know they do not, and have little faith in their fashion sense. Who is it that buys Cosm…
/r/MensRights12/06/13 10:28 PM
1

read below
/r/MensRights12/06/13 10:23 PM
1

Baseball, Football, Basketball... the US ones. Not to say the US doesn't play hockey, but with out a doubt, that is a Canadian sport that Americans play, whereas the other 3 are American sports yous guys play :P
/r/MensRights12/06/13 05:15 PM
10

You know, if I were a mechanic, I would totally do that too. It is just playing the odds. And statistically, in that situation, more often then not (I would guess by a wide margin), the husband is the one who would understand if either do... or, even if neither do, has been given authority or taken it upon himself to be the decision maker in that situation. Truth is, more guys like cars... I didn't see many girls drawing car pictures/designs when I was a kid, and there are a ton of situations I …
/r/MensRights12/06/13 05:08 PM
24

I have always found it strange, that male sports (at least in the US) promote breast cancer awareness instead of, you know, prostate cancer since the players wearing the ribbons do have a reasonable chance of getting that one(men have about the same chance of getting breast cancer as women do prostate cancer, though, for women, the gland is referred to as the Skenes gland and is likely the cause of g-spot orgasms http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Do_women_have_prostates ). It is even more dumbfounding w…
/r/MensRights12/06/13 06:35 AM
3

If you applied the same rules of 'molesting' that women use, those numbers would be much higher. I have had my butt pinched more times than I can count by women I barely knew, if knew at all. Though, admittedly, I have pinched some butts too. But I knew all of them.
/r/MensRights12/06/13 04:33 AM
7

Those complaining are not gamer's, were never in sports, and are just looking for reason to be upset for the feels. That was some of the mildest trash talking I have ever heard. If that offends her/them... then gaming is just a pedestal to broadcast an annoying cause, and not a pastime for her.
/r/MensRights12/06/13 04:31 AM
1

Equality sometimes hurts, lol.
/r/MensRights12/06/13 04:23 AM
17

The best way to win these arguments is to switch the subject from what employees make in salary, to what each employee costs their company. Just looking at a dollar amount one earns at the end of the year can easily be manipulated. Looking at the actual cost of each employee, to the company... well that is much harder to manipulate. Truth is, companies budget a workers salary based on entire employment cost. Women tend to get better insurance then men, use their insurance more, take off for far …
/r/MensRights12/06/13 04:12 AM
6

Being against feminism is not the same as being against female rights. This subreddit is doing a ton of good. It is spreading logical truths that cannot be countered. The more people that read them, the more people learn. When there are enough people who have seen the counter arguments to feminist propaganda, then you will see a much more active MRA push in society as a whole. As was said above, the Feminist machine is still to strong, and apt to crush anyone who spreads anything against their v…
/r/MensRights11/06/13 11:10 PM
17

His punch, was likely more a slap, an instantaneous reaction to her assault (and since she immediately stood back up, not unreasonable force)... Things that happen instantly due to another's action, are not by any definition I can think of revenge. Revenge takes thought, and some amount of planning (say, had he waited for 5 seconds stewing in his anger). Things that happen instantly, are called instinct, and are in no way synonymous with revenge. Nice try though. This will be thrown out, almost …
/r/MensRights11/06/13 10:49 PM
5

The world lost one of its best voices for freedom when Hitch passed. I raise a glass of Johnny Walker to his memory.
/r/MensRights11/06/13 10:34 PM
11

The comments section in the NYT's on this article is nauseating. It is just a circle jerk of hypocrisy.
/r/MensRights11/06/13 07:22 PM
65

Here is what I see. Man and woman get into some sort of verbal argument, no laws are broken. Woman becomes physically aggressive and either hits man with bottle or pours drink in mans face (either one is assault and illegal), man protects himself and drops woman to the floor (legal, especially with video backing it up). It should be a open and closed case, it will not be, though, because women believe they have license to assault.
/r/MensRights11/06/13 07:17 PM
1

That right there is what is wrong with most feminists. Like a religion, feminism defines them. The radicals in control of the movement are like the westside babtists' or taliban or other extremists in religion, driving away the young because of the insanity they represent. The more that turn away, the more crazy the leaders get about keeping everyone in line because of the loss of power those leaving represent. It is a blast to watch fall apart on them, and they continue shooting themselves in t…
/r/MensRights11/06/13 04:14 AM
2

Lol. I really feel bad for kids today. My childhood was much more free than what I see of the kids today. And I am not sure we can ever get that back for them. I know some of it is just 'good 'ol days syndrome', but I was much less self conscious (or at least i feel I was) than what I see in kids today. The pressures put on them just steal what was great about being a kid. It almost seems like being poor and not having tons of electronic distractions always at their beck and call, like I see in …
/r/MensRights11/06/13 03:22 AM
3

Fashion any decade is absurd when looked at decades later. The bell bottoms and leisure suits of the '70's were no more absurd than the parachute pants and zipper jackets of the 80's Don't even get me started on that miami vice fashion time period. And Z-Cavviricci's and grunge in the 90's was no real improvement. And as to arcades, the 80's are where they were best, there just were not enough great games in the 70's... they may have started in the 70's, but from about '82-87 I was at putt-putt …
/r/MensRights11/06/13 03:11 AM
6

Well, by sense I mean common sense... as in little boys did not get suspended for drawing army pictures and playing army at school with finger guns, and children actually did this thing called playing outside instead of living cloistered lives in front of a game console or the ever watchful eyes of the helicopter parent afraid of the boogeyman. Male neighbors would actually play pickup football with the kids in the street or yards, instead of today's view of being afraid of seeming creepy by enj…
/r/MensRights11/06/13 02:56 AM
1

lol, problem is, teachers make ~40k a year for 9 (8 if you count christmas break/spring break/ other holidays off)months work, while the average construction worker makes ~40k for 12 months :P Teachers that work summer school sessions increase their pay to ~50k, but women don't become teachers to work in the summer :/ The metric by which workers are compared should be how much they cost their companies. That is the true metric of compensation, and one that is much harder to manipulate.
/r/MensRights10/06/13 11:03 PM
1

I am arguing actual cost of each employee to a company. If employee A gets and takes off more paid time/gets better insurance that is more often used than employee B whom takes off less paid days and has lesser insurance that is less often used but gets a slightly higher salary to make up for their less use of company benefits... there is no difference between their pay. Pay is not a salary dollar amount, pay is the actual dollar amount of the entirety of what they get... and to a company what m…
/r/MensRights10/06/13 10:25 PM
11

I am sure rapists have said all sorts of things mid rape... does that mean if I use anything any rapist has ever said I am making a rape joke? Do you see the absurdity in that? Rapists don't say that because they learned it from being raped or seeing someone else raped, they say it because it has been said to them about something unpleasant that was happening to them. I did not learn that term from rape, and neither did they.
/r/MensRights10/06/13 10:17 PM
2

But when the intangibles wipe any gap off the map, there is no real pay gap... it is a discrepancy in numbers because the numbers do not include the benefits women use and men do not.
/r/MensRights10/06/13 10:11 PM
3

there is no pay gap, 2% is negligible, and the 23% is a farce. If women could be payed less for the same work/hours, only women would be employed. Women give up pay for intangibles, and do not work nearly as many hours as men. The pay gap is a myth, nothing more. Benefits do not count as pay, and women are far more concerned with benefits than salary, and get far more benefits that cost companies money than men do.
/r/MensRights10/06/13 10:04 PM
3

'I say the gender payscale non-discrimination laws should only apply to companies larger than 50 employees. What do you say?' I say there is no paygap for equal work with equal skills/responsibility/experience/hours... that Swedish women (feminist utopia) who have all the bells and whistles that should help them succeed better, instead are comfortable succeeding less because of all the bells and whistles make it too comfortable for them. Guys are judged on what they do in the workplace, and so s…
/r/MensRights10/06/13 09:44 PM
22

Uhh, just exactly what it says it does. Whatever that is happening that is unpleasant will soon be over... kind of shorthand for give up/foregone conclusion.
/r/MensRights10/06/13 09:38 PM
20

My mom had the police called on her in the mid 80's because of photo's of my baby brother naked that she staged. They were/are damn cute photos too (still up in family area of house for all to see)... they are of him standing in cowboy boots that take up his whole legs with his fat baby bottom to the camera looking over his shoulder at the camera wearing a cowboy hat... the photo booth developers called the cops on her, and the cop looked at the photo and called the guy at the booth an idiot and…
/r/MensRights10/06/13 09:32 PM
5

lol, not in defense of typhonblue, but you whining about a grasp of history... pot meet kettle.
/r/MensRights10/06/13 03:12 AM
4

Problem is, you have to have the mods on your side or not to care to be effective. I don't see that happening here.
/r/MensRights09/06/13 09:03 PM
2

lol, u swing from the ying to the yang depending on the day.
/r/MensRights07/06/13 08:34 PM
2

That statistic is as misleading as it gets. It takes into account Farmville and other casual crap. When it comes to real games, games that have high learning curves, and require more than a minute or two to play, women represent at best 20%...
/r/MensRights07/06/13 04:35 PM
7

More reason not to imo. Facebook is a place that panders to gossip and those enamored with it.
/r/MensRights07/06/13 04:14 PM
3

So, I wonder... would you go to jail for watching a movie that had a very graphic rape scene? The movie Irreversible, with Monica Bellucci comes to mind. That movie had a rape scene that was around 10-12 minutes, and was extremely realistic, and disturbing. In a normal movie. Does seeing that make you a sex offender?
/r/MensRights07/06/13 04:03 PM
3

OMFG, maybe the writer did not mean a male rape innuendo, but instead meant that since this guy was saying he was going to be 'targeted' by MRA's for his opinion, him being 'in the barrel' meant he was being targeted by that writers 'prose' gun. IE, the writer's "words bullet' was in the barrel, aimed at him. Do they even read the article? Nothing at all about prison rape. Thank goodness the writer didn't say 'locked and loaded' I shudder to think how that could be misrepresented.
/r/MensRights06/06/13 04:02 PM
2

It is funny, reading the comments at the times, you can tell who is offended, single mothers, feminists and gays. The gist of that article is that a loving male and female parent give the child a full perspective. Women and feminists resent that a household without a male, denies the child of masculine qualities only a male can really provide. And gays, because 2 mom or 2 dad households also rob the child of that opposite sex perspective. We all know children can do fine, overall coming from sin…
/r/MensRights06/06/13 03:26 PM
1

"I think having women/men only functions like that are fine. My only beef as a woman is that women's only functions like baby showers and bridal showers suck. I hate them!" I couldn't agree more. Which makes me scratch my head at all the trying to shoehorn guys into them now. Nuh uhh, do not want. You girls can have those occasions all to yourselves. Watching someone open baby presents for however long while feigning excitement or oohing and awwing... I got sports to watch and naps to be had :P …
/r/MensRights06/06/13 02:52 AM
3

I guess because most in this sub are not adolescents and could give a fuck about facebook. The mature response of 'quit facebook', doesn't play well with people who cannot envision life without facebook. Thus, not a huge amount of uproar about a site that is built around pandering to women's obsession with gossip, panadering to women... must mean we support feminism and censorship. In other words, he is relying on the feels instead of the logic, and throwing a tantrum... as those who rely on fee…
/r/MensRights05/06/13 10:25 PM
3

I believe she is already worth more than a billion dollars. Being COO of facebook for 5 years will do that.
/r/MensRights05/06/13 01:52 PM
1

Sheryl Kara Sandberg (born August 28, 1969)[1] is an American businesswoman. She has served as the chief operating officer of Facebook since 2008. In June 2012, she was also elected to the board of directors by the existing board members,[2] becoming the first woman to serve on its board. Before Facebook, Sandberg was Vice President of Global Online Sales and Operations at Google.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 09:15 PM
2

Look, speaking logic to these people is like speaking it to feminists. They are so invested in FB, deleting their accounts is like suggesting they cut off their foot. It is sad, but very true.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 02:10 PM
-4

you should learn about flyers and telephones.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 02:05 PM
4

Being a good parent would solve that problem. The only way facebook will change this, is if it hurts their bottom line. How do you hurt their bottom line? Take your business elsewhere. That is what doomed myspace, at the height of its power.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 01:28 PM
0

Here is the problem, guys don't give a fuck about facebook. The only reason guys are on facebook is because girls are on facebook. Guys are on reddit and youtube in spite of girls being there. I see huge blowback when those are censored, but facebook is about posting pictures and hooking up and the 10% of nazi feminists will have pull in a place like that because women always care, guys only care if it effects them, and these things being censored doesn't stop them from looking at photos or hook…
/r/MensRights04/06/13 01:26 PM
21

One of Zuckerberg's/Facebook's top deputies is that lean in woman. The one spreading the myth that women can have it all. Are you really that surprised? This is why i suggest guys MGTOW facebook. That whole deck is stacked against us. It is junior high there anyway...no real loss.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 12:00 PM
8

Leave facebook. Problem solved.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 11:28 AM
1

happy cake day!
/r/MensRights03/06/13 11:15 PM
6

2% is negligible, though, which is what I said. The other study you are referring to is based on a survey format... this one is much more thorough, as they profiled and interviewed each person to best place that person to a better job/etc. Being a placement company, this data is very important to them, and they would have put considerable effort into that data being as accurate as possible.
/r/MensRights02/06/13 03:59 PM
3

I said average. Average people can write code, or get systems or networks to work. They can also lead. They are just average at it all. Average is not incompetent.
/r/MensRights02/06/13 02:09 PM
6

I would guess, if anything, with how sought after they are by the industry, they likely earn a bit more. No doubt they advance faster and the companies bend over backwards to help them. There are a lot of good women in tech. Thing is, most are just average, like the male employees... but no one is bending over backwards to advance average male employees to improve their diversity image.
/r/MensRights02/06/13 01:43 PM
-1

I think that is the point. It is a FTFY version, that the OP prefers to the actual campaign.
/r/MensRights02/06/13 01:21 PM
28

Confirmation of what we have all already known. Any wage gap between the sexes based on same job, same education, same experience and same hours is negligible. Women do not seek high paying jobs. Women seek high social justice, and high quality of life jobs. Same choices (equality) does not mean same outcome (highest paying jobs). "Adds Bardaro: “Contrary to popular belief, the issue isn’t that women earn less than men (generally speaking). Instead the issue is women tend to choose different job…
/r/MensRights02/06/13 12:31 PM
15

I have learned that if a girl ever asks what kind of car I drive, before she has ever seen my car, just to cease making eye contact, and back away slowly.
/r/MensRights01/06/13 11:43 PM
22

'There is an epidemic of gold digging whores'
/r/MensRights01/06/13 07:35 PM
1

The reason they hate her, is because she did something feminism was too self absorbed to think about. She cared. She helped battered women, instead of grabbing a bullhorn and whining like a child making a spectacle of herself burning a bra. They hate her, because she has more clout than them, because her reasons were selfless. They hate her, because they cannot effectively counter or shut her up. They hate her, because she thinks for herself instead of regurgitating the hive mind. They hate her …
/r/MensRights01/06/13 08:32 AM
15

I think that just makes one human.
/r/MensRights01/06/13 06:12 AM
6

It is the reciprocal to dick.
/r/MensRights01/06/13 01:07 AM
4

Is it wrong that I knew what she would look like before I had ever seen her? Just saying.
/r/MensRights01/06/13 01:06 AM
1

Boobs sag because muscle and skin give out when you age, just like everything else in your body, wearing a bra does nothing to counter either. A man will still get a gut, regardless of any girdle he wears when his abdomen muscles begin to give out. Same concept. If you want to falsely believe bras keep your boobs from sagging, I can't stop you, and all the bra makers sincerely making x$'s per year from you thank you.
/r/MensRights31/05/13 10:38 PM
9

The numbers I have seen are 70% of all divorces are initiated by women. That is in line with 2-1 (66%) and nowhere near equal, and begs the question "are divorces and divorce law better for women"?
/r/MensRights31/05/13 08:47 PM
1

The people who watch cable news and listen to talk radio are disproportionately conservative. Liberals get their news from print. Thus, polls like this, will almost always skew towards a conservative station over a liberal one, not to mention, those who take polls are apt to be older, which sways them more conservative. Plus, CNN has sucked for years and years (not that they are truly liberal or anything, but i digress.). My main point is people like yourself, who continually bemoan fox news, gi…
/r/MensRights31/05/13 06:09 PM
1

Yeah, did you notice they only took into account cable stations. There is no doubt that among cable news, fox dominates, problem is, most people get their news from the networks. edited above post, too.
/r/MensRights31/05/13 06:01 PM
1

But election nights and special disasters do not count because at those times everyone is watching what they normally would not. The perception is, that at any given time a large % of the american audience is watching fox news, which is completely baseless. The big 3 networks outdraw fox news nightly by multiples of 3 and 4 each. Fox News does great for cable, thing is, everyone else in cable news draws below a million. In that context, Fox does great, in reality, at most, only 1% of the country…
/r/MensRights31/05/13 05:54 PM
1

That is the top show, and most of the viewers for the #2 and #3 shows are leftovers from Orielly. If the top show, at most draws less than 1% and all other shows draw considerably less, common sense tells me no where near the people watch, that you seem to think do.
/r/MensRights31/05/13 05:35 PM
-1

The fact that you think they have a large audience makes me weep. Their top show (O'Rielly Factor) draws a whopping 3 million viewers. That is less than 1% of the country. By no definition I can think of is that a large audience. Funniest thing is, the reason you believe they have power is because you and others like you whine about them so often and post as many of their stories as it seems you can. Their success is most on your shoulders. They do well for cable news, nothing else.
/r/MensRights31/05/13 04:33 PM
-1

Or put scotch tape or a band aid on your nipple to protect them when you are doing something really active. It is what I did (though a guy) when I ran cross country back in the day. Nothing worse than nipple bleed. At this point, with the research I have seen, other than to lift the boobs, there really is little other good that comes from bras. They do nothing to prevent sag, and are just an additional monetary cost for women, with an industry loathe to give up those profits.
/r/MensRights31/05/13 04:11 PM
29

lol, I am always bewildered that the LGBT crowd is so firmly attached at the hip with feminism, and this is how feminism thinks of them. Feminist so take them for granted.
/r/MensRights31/05/13 03:49 PM
1

I am so confused, did you mean to reply to someone else?
/r/MensRights31/05/13 03:40 PM
3

You don't seem to know much about golf, because if you did, you would understand the difference between the PGA, and the LPGA. PGA players play from considerably further tees. They also, have considerably harder hole placement, faster greens and far less forgiving roughs. She was above par both days. +1 the 1st. She got there on an exemption. That by it's very definition is not earning it. It means, you did not do what everyone else playing here did, but we'll let you play anyway. Not earning th…
/r/MensRights31/05/13 12:39 PM
1

Why was she OFFERED a spot? That's right, because she had a vagina. Like I said, she earn the spot, i got no problems. She didn't earn the spot.
/r/MensRights31/05/13 03:10 AM
1

She took a spot from someone who went through all the things everyone else on the PGA went through, she skipped all of that, because she was 'special', lol. About as special as you.
/r/MensRights31/05/13 02:38 AM
1

This is a sporting event, one in which she would never be able to compete. The amateur men have been practicing their whole lives to get to the point where they could get an invite to something like the colonial. That she entered as a bit, a millionaire many times over already, and took the spot that should have gone to someone just starting out, because she wanted the spotlight and to be a part of a media circus to inflate her already bloated ego... that is the problem. Someone didn't get to pl…
/r/MensRights31/05/13 02:22 AM
2

You just beat her up with her own posts like Chris Brown beats Rhianna. I bet she falsely accuses you of raping her with logic, now. Though you pillaged her for sure, lol.
/r/MensRights31/05/13 02:09 AM
3

'No woman has ever made the cut at a PGA event. Being invited was most likely viewed as quite an honor in and of itself.' So she should have declined, and just been honored to have been invited, and left the spot for an amateur male. The only reason she went, is because she believed the hype. Had she known she would be +8 on a short course, do you think she would have attended? I don't. She listened to the sycophants telling her she was the one, and the media, and then laid an egg in front of th…
/r/MensRights31/05/13 01:55 AM
5

Ok then, she went to the colonial to miss the cut, that was her plan all along. Lay an egg in front of huge media to increase her sponsorships. The most successful woman golfer of all time, played the Colonial because she wanted to embarrass herself. Gotcha.
/r/MensRights31/05/13 01:39 AM
6

She would have loved to be able to make it on the men's tour, that is where the bigger money is, not to mention her sponsorships would have exploded far beyond anything she could get on a tour (lpga) no one watches . Had she made the cut, or if lightning struck and she got top ten, she would have tried again. She was there to size herself up on an easy course against mostly middling players. She didn't size up, and no one else would waste an invite on her. I live in Dallas, and went to that tour…
/r/MensRights31/05/13 01:28 AM
7

she didn't ever try playing another because she didn't make the cut, at the colonial, a short course. If she was the best woman golfer at the time, most successful of all time, and was unable to make the cut at one of the easiest events (+8), there really was no more reason to show interest elsewhere on the men's tour. Do I know enough to speak on the subject?
/r/MensRights31/05/13 01:12 AM
0

I imagine some gay bars can do well with that, Friday night ladies night for the ladies and Saturday men's night for the gay men, rest of the week same price for both.
/r/MensRights31/05/13 01:05 AM
1

She asked if I owned a gun (i didn't/don't) and if I did would I slam her over a table and take her from behind while keeping a loaded gun to her head... that to me is suicidal, the type of thing one should talk to a professional about.
/r/MensRights31/05/13 12:45 AM
0

I have no problem with a little rough, but I am talking wanting to be choked out, or punched in the gut, or backhanded as hard as possible across the face... or fantasizing about having a loaded gun pointed at your head while simulating rape... If that stuff turns you on, then I do think something is a little wrong with you. That sounds like people with death wishes or severe depression/manic to me.
/r/MensRights31/05/13 12:18 AM
5

It is funny. I stumbled on to you about this time last year during the beginning of the tropes kickstarter fiasco, well before I was aware of MRA's/MRM or MRHM whatever... I liked that video and then went on to watch all the rest (not as many as there are now). I immediately thought to myself 'this girl thinks like I do' (you don't seem the type to be offended that in my head I think girl, hope you are not)... thus, it is kinda cool whenever you reply to anything I say. I think you are one of th…
/r/MensRights31/05/13 12:06 AM
49

Radical feminists do not get satire. Too close to the feels
/r/MensRights30/05/13 05:54 PM
9

Not wrong at all. They wanted equality, and equality sometimes hurts.
/r/MensRights30/05/13 06:22 AM
1

grocery delivery?
/r/MensRights30/05/13 05:24 AM
3

Here is what should happen. Men leave. If 70% of the men on facebook leave, because facebook is no longer conducive to their rights, a likely % of women would soon follow them. One of facebooks big draws, is the social interaction between men and women, without the bulk of men there, the bulk of women would have little reason to stay. Who do you think facebook is more worried about losing? The majority of men, or 5-10% of their women who identify as whiny, radical feminists?
/r/MensRights30/05/13 05:23 AM
0

IDK, I was in highschool in the 90's, and guys might feign slut shaming in front of the girls, because to do so was better than being constantly beaten down by the girls who made it their mission to agree with them to hate someone... but in reality, guys like supposed 'sluts'. They may refer to them as such, which girls might take as slut shaming if they overhear, but at least in my experience, back the (and in college) it was not meant in a derogatory way... more like head bobbing up and down w…
/r/MensRights29/05/13 09:20 PM
0

Erin Pizzey makes good points about a lot of things. That is why the feminists hate her so much.
/r/MensRights29/05/13 08:55 PM
2

I dated a girl who lost her virginity to her boyfriend at the time while she was passed out at age 15(raped). She was mormon, so sex of any kind was a serious no no. Basically, she told me that once it got around, the women in her church slut shamed her as well as all her girlfriends. She ended up getting back with the guy because she became such a pariah, she had no alternative, and blamed herself for what he did to her. I felt so bad for her. I remember her asking if I wanted to beat the guy u…
/r/MensRights29/05/13 08:51 PM
2

This girl is nothing but a 3 year old who throws a tantrum and blames others for the train wreck that is her life. She is the typical child star who was coddled her whole life, and never heard the word no, or was held accountable for her actions. Welcome to the real world, where handlers don't 'handle' all your ills. She needs serious treatment, and about 15 years of maturity.
/r/MensRights29/05/13 08:41 PM
0

sure, there are some men who fall in line, but in general, guys like girls who want to have sex, and stand the most to lose by making them feel bad about wanting to have sex. Other girls, who demand a litany of steps be met before they will have sex with guys have the most to lose from other females who are cool skipping those steps, so they lash out, lest they lose all the gifts.
/r/MensRights29/05/13 08:35 PM
-2

Girls who dress provocatively get attention, other girls who do not, envy that attention, and slut shame.
/r/MensRights29/05/13 08:31 PM
-1

I don't know. In my experience, at least in college, the women's studies, radical feminists always seemed broken sexually. Not sure on the cum bucket part, but I was always shocked with how they wanted to be choked, and hit/slapped/roughed up during sex. My mind is just not made for that type of sex. I have had rough, hard sex, for sure, but that was all it was... i would describe it more an unabridged, passionate sex... not an attempt to injure, which is what they, in my experience wanted. I th…
/r/MensRights29/05/13 08:27 PM
4

Women believe they have a license to hit. So when you have 2 women in a relationship, that is just too much license to hit, for there to not be some hitting. As to lesbian rape... in my experience women went off the rails if they wanted sex and I did not. They take it as a personal affront, and it is scary. When I have been turned down for sex, my reaction has always been "aww man..." roll over and go to sleep. I have woken up being raped by multiple girlfriends in the past, girls I had said no …
/r/MensRights29/05/13 08:05 PM
3

Hard sciences are misogynistic. Equalit... I mean social sciences are better because they take into account the feels
/r/MensRights29/05/13 07:41 PM
3

Actually, they can't leave, at least not without TED throwing a tantrum... it seems they are trying to force their morality on their speakers.
/r/MensRights29/05/13 07:36 PM
1

I think most states/countries distinguish, or have limits, that do distinguish between between child molestation and statutory rape. As to child porn, i have no idea what to do about that. It was one thing when it was an adult filming themselves having sex with underage girls/children... but technology has put a camera on everything. And we willingly put that technology in the hands of people who are incapable of understanding the ramifications of their actions. Sexting/webcaming has replaced pl…
/r/MensRights29/05/13 01:32 PM
2

it is scary the number of 7 and 8 year old girls going through puberty. It has to do with the increase in obesity and like you said, the leeching of estrogen like chemicals. I have a cousin whose daughter started her period at 9 (not obese, either)... that is just not natural, and really unfair to be dealing with in 3rd grade. I think they talked about depo or some other form of birth control to help stop her menstruation, but decided to just let her weather it. Poor little one. The term this au…
/r/MensRights29/05/13 01:07 PM
14

yep, species wise, when you have gone through puberty, you are no longer a child/prepubescent. We have extended the age of childhood legally, because there is so much more to learn then there used to be, and because in the west we have that luxury...but people forget, that our species grew in the wombs of 13,14,15 year old's. When the life expectancy of humans was 30 for most of time, there was only so much time to procreate in, so as soon as you could, you often did. And we are all here today, …
/r/MensRights29/05/13 12:52 PM
13

Show up with a lawyer in the morning. If they have no proof, are unwilling to consider evidence or the lack thereof, show up ready to fight in the am. If you accept this, it will be with you forever. They expect you not to fight. That is why they are steamrolling you. Sure, you could possibly lose your job for fighting it. Thing is, if you don't, you better be employed there for the rest of your life, because that mark is enough for them not to recommend you.
/r/MensRights29/05/13 08:10 AM
7

she is 15 now, 14 when it happened.
/r/MensRights29/05/13 07:55 AM
2

She is as white as Zimmerman. How did the media run with that story? White man kills black kid? s/
/r/MensRights29/05/13 07:53 AM
2

I listened... not really worth it. It is NPR ( a station I listen to, btw) and it was apparent who they were trying not to offend. They barely scratch the surface, and just focus on inner city/those in jail with the gist being jobs, nothing about more parental rights.
/r/MensRights28/05/13 11:56 PM
15

they do carry guns
/r/MensRights28/05/13 07:24 PM
1

This Judge took judicial privilege to a whole new level
/r/MensRights28/05/13 01:41 PM
79

Because white women are the most privileged beings on the planet
/r/MensRights28/05/13 01:37 PM
2

games are doing, movies are watching... though I enjoy some movies (i don't watch near the movies I used to, though) and enjoy science fiction and fantasy books.
/r/MensRights28/05/13 11:35 AM
10

Funny thing is, women use more utilities (use more water, hairdryers, typically more lights and leave them on more often) so she will charge them less and they will cost her more, lol.
/r/MensRights28/05/13 06:08 AM
4

It is apparent this writer and her followers are the feelings police, and have not figured out that the good that comes from the openness of reddit far outweighs the bad. There are 400 million unique visitors to reddit each month. A small percentage say mean things, or dox, or sleuth, or share nudies... Welcome to the internet. Giving up the freedom, which would be their solution, is not worth the cost, because the fact of life is, some people are asses no matter where you are, and if what they …
/r/MensRights26/05/13 09:45 AM
-3

I would say you do have 100% equality, you just do not have 100% privilege, not to mention, you have all sorts of protections I do not.
/r/MensRights24/05/13 06:09 AM
1

It is not so much that we are against marriage, for the most part, MRA's, just think with divorce being near 50%,and women being the initiators of 70% of divorces, the risks far outweigh the rewards.
/r/MensRights23/05/13 06:09 AM
5

It did not get funding because it was for men, not for lack of use. There are women's shelters in canada with similar usage.
/r/MensRights23/05/13 05:54 AM
6

His shelter was being used, so much so, the grocery bill shut him down. Your response implied it was not being used. Men do seek help, there is just no one there to help them when they do, and yes, feminist groups downplay because they do not wish to share the government funds used to keep women's shelters running.
/r/MensRights23/05/13 05:44 AM
3

It was shut down because he spent all his money on groceries, to feed the people you are saying were not there.
/r/MensRights23/05/13 05:22 AM
1

LOL, you are joking right? LOLOLOLOLOLOL She was fired because her company's servers were taken down by a denial of service attack, that avfm had nothing to do with, and angst here and at 4chan that avfm, had nothing to do with. LOL. They looked you up on linkedin, because just like 99.9% of the rest of the planet, they have no idea who you or avfm, is. Your play of events seems to skip the internet blowing up on them for what, the prior 4 days? All of their customers, no longer able to access t…
/r/MensRights21/05/13 05:03 AM
2

His site had fuck all to do with achieving anything with Adria Richards, this subreddit (along with other 4chan and other safe male spaces) did. That site has less and less to do with achieving anything for MRM. It is all about bringing attention to themselves. They are the PETA of this movement. They care about attention at all costs, not the cause. Articles like this only stroke the egos of the already initiated. They do nothing for conversion. And I assure you, MLK would not look kindly on th…
/r/MensRights20/05/13 11:43 PM
1

That is not really saying much. The US just had to do all the initial heavy lifting in tiny ass Libya, because combined, Europe still was not capable. That is just Libya. A country of 5 million.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 06:39 PM
0

I know what he does. I have no problem with him saying a woman, drunk and dressed like a street walker is akin to a man who leaves his car running with the windows down in a bad neighborhood. This, is not that. This is fabricating an entire story and then at the end yelling 'fooled you! nananana, because you do it to us'. And I think we are better than that. I think for us to win, we have to be. This will not end well. This is a mistake we will have to live with for a long time. No one will reme…
/r/MensRights20/05/13 10:15 AM
1

This article is like something I would see in front of a frat house that was near mine back when I was in college. It was in a high traffic area, and on a saturday, they would sit on their balcony drinking beer with a dollar bill tied to a fishing line. People would see the dollar bill and chase it all around their yard. Sure, it was good for a laugh, but at the end of the day it was nothing but a dick move. What one would expect from a bunch of frat douches. I expect more from AvFM.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 08:16 AM
4

But could you compete? I mean, yeah, there could be some jobs, but they wouldn't be good paying jobs... here in the US, our coal workers don't make near what they used to. The real problem is, you guys, Western Europe, the US, Canada... for 60-70 years we were only really competing against each other with the US and Canada at a huge advantage because we were not destroyed in the war. Now we have to compete with the rest of the world. They all have the mining technologies, at 1/10th the costs. We…
/r/MensRights20/05/13 03:07 AM
1

How many of your plants still run on coal? Last I checked it is the very left that complains about using coal.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 02:45 AM
1

But you do have to have perspective. Only statistical anomalies in all of Western Europe are living anything that realistically can be considered a 'bad' lifestyle. She whines about the steel workers/coal workers, but if the government had continued to subsidize and lose money on those industries, she would be the first to be whining about 'why there were so many miners in a 1st world culture'. Thatcher cut the fat and made your society competitive again. You have high taxes, and no real capable…
/r/MensRights20/05/13 02:39 AM
10

So, 2 sentences about women specialists working less then male specialists, and then the rest is from a feminist playing smoke and mirrors about how much women have achieved and avoiding the staffing shortfall questions that arise in the 1st 2 sentences... lol
/r/MensRights19/05/13 11:45 PM
4

If the pharma's could sell to both sides, you can be damn sure they would. Men would love having a male pill, and big pharma would love supplying it to them. Thing is, it is a much harder pill to make with reasonable side effects. As cstrayer says, they are getting close, though.
/r/MensRights19/05/13 11:27 PM
3

LOL, if it were not for Thatcher, there would have been nothing stopping you guys from changing currencies. That sure is working out great for all of your union buddies across the channel, huh? You have one of the few strong currencies left in the world... much to the chagrin of the far left... The working class is doing fine in Britain. Your people, all of them, live better than 90% of all the other people on the planet. Quit with the crocodile tears. History looks kindly on the iron lady, even…
/r/MensRights19/05/13 10:21 PM
5

lol. Britain before Thatcher was a country that had to shut down every 2 weeks for a countrywide strike. Now Britain runs efficiently. The reason there is still so much hatred towards this woman is because she broke the liberal/unionists in the country and made it impossible for them to ever return. It turns out the people of Britain like things to run efficiently... schools, transportation, health services... and they look across the straight and see a country (france) that is very much like th…
/r/MensRights19/05/13 09:58 PM
1

Is there any way to copy paste the hate here, not signing up for facebook stupidity.
/r/MensRights19/05/13 09:50 PM
3

Just that they think they are better drivers is funny. Men have less accidents per mile, women drive far less miles...
/r/MensRights19/05/13 09:48 PM
9

While they certainly are individuals, when it came to train tracks, I saw a lot of women waving their arms, but every time it was a man that jumped down on the tracks and saved the day. It seems, women won't risk their lives for some stranger. There were a awful lot of those train track scenes, and at most the women would try and get someone else to do it. One of those dudes was a frikken ninja, saving what appeared to be a child.
/r/MensRights19/05/13 06:47 AM
12

Well, that is the definition to sane people. The definition to the insane, who are in control of college campuses, is a protected group of some sort, that is under performing, and preferably black or latino, female, and of the LGBT crowd. The holy grail would be black, female and lesbian. A straight, asian, high intelligence male student would have just as little chance as this white guy... and we all know Asian's are a minority in the US...
/r/MensRights18/05/13 09:20 PM
-4

I imagine it has something to do with why she hates men... because they don't much like her. That there is a girl who was taught to clean her plate. Lol, she didn't have to threaten to shoot her old boss, I imagine a 'nom nom nom' threat would have been just as terrifying. Or maybe a bull rush. I...can't...stop. Insults too easy in her case, and well deserved.
/r/MensRights18/05/13 09:03 PM
1

To be fair, isn't mining of minerals what is driving the boom in Australia? Most men might not be mining, but a damn lot are.
/r/MensRights18/05/13 07:45 PM
3

What is scary, is that men have had to ignore, lest they be thought to be a pedophile, an entire generation of children, and likely generations to come. It is not so much children are taught to be afraid of men, it is that men are afraid of children, and how children respond to that. Men must not like kids. It is a win/win for the feminists. Demonize men to adults/ while making them afraid to interact with children, thus demonizing them with kids too.
/r/MensRights18/05/13 07:40 PM
9

I say date the foreign exchange students who are just happy to be in the country. They have automatic expiration dates, are way, way cooler, and you can learn about a new culture and will already know someone if you ever visit their city/country. College is the absolute worst time to date an american girl. It is the high point of their entitlement phase, and ironically, their victim phase. Avoid American college girls like the plague.
/r/MensRights18/05/13 02:46 AM
1

No, what you do, and what is most effective, is voting with your wallet. No longer go on dates there. That is their bread and butter. This is just a way for them to try and get butts into empty seats during lunch breaks, or get gaggles of stay at home moms in there when their kids are at the local mothers day off. They know who doesn't go there during the afternoons, monday - friday... men... because men are working. Shrug. It is their business, and while I do not like this policy, I am a firm b…
/r/MensRights18/05/13 12:28 AM
1

I suggest less subsidies. If you do the bare minimum, your life is not meant to be comfortable. Even in the US, when we whine about most working poor, what we do not take into account, is those working poor, are still living a life better than 70%-80% of the people on the planet, and 90-95% better than all the people who have ever lived throughout history. We are so completely spoiled in western societies. So... you have to work 40 hours a week at $10 an hour and are still below the poverty line…
/r/MensRights18/05/13 12:21 AM
2

Protest them. This is a perfect opportunity to bring up a mens right issue. It is their business, no laws against it (at least) in Texas, the only way to effect change is bad publicity, not email.
/r/MensRights17/05/13 11:59 PM
4

Is it time to perform a blood sacrament? I am about to start that line of questing. It is such a pleasure to play again this many years later with all the mods. I think I have ~ 120 running.
/r/MensRights17/05/13 11:53 PM
1

There is expectation, there is just no loss of lifestyle without it. Still, fathers average many more hours of work than mothers. It is funny, because, all of these benefits were installed because of feminism, under the idea it would enable women. It enabled em all right... enabled em to have a baby and sit on their ass. They have the least achieving women in the westernized world. That is feminism winning. Because it is still the majority of men subsidizing the women through the taxes they pay …
/r/MensRights17/05/13 11:39 PM
2

In sweden? Joint custody is automatic. There is no child support in sweden with joint custody. If one of the 2 parents does not wish joint custody, it is based on income up to a maximum, and the government supplements if one of the parents does not make enough. In that case, it is a % of your income, with regards to what that parent would need to survive. Women ARE actually expected to make enough to support their share of the child, it is just that because of all of their benefits, that amount …
/r/MensRights17/05/13 10:46 PM
1

I think affordable child care, businesses that pay extremely beneficial child rearing off time, and all the other benefits have far more to do with making women get a reasonably comfortable life and thus strive less than they otherwise would then anything the courts have decided. AFAIK, it is set up where both parents get the same benefits, and could easily work at 75% their normal hours till their kids are age 10. But what happens in reality is the men still work their 100 or more % and the wom…
/r/MensRights17/05/13 09:38 PM
10

Sweden has all of that, plus a lot, lot more. Know what the results are? Women work even less, achieve even less, and are much further behind career wise than their counterparts in the US and other westernized countries. I am not against more affordable childcare/options... I just happen to also look elsewhere to see what the results are. It seems that when childcare costs are up, women strive to go beyond least common denominator to get ahead.
/r/MensRights17/05/13 08:00 AM
-2

Hate to point this one out, but while Britain invented the english language, the US is the main speaker of it, inventor of the internet, plane, reddit and on and on, which is what has caused it to become the world language it is today, instead of french. Thus, you can cram your archaic "no one pays attention to anymore, except a few wankers on a tiny island" dictionary up your ass :P
/r/MensRights16/05/13 12:14 PM
-2

loss of morals ='s immoral. Go troll somewhere else.
/r/MensRights16/05/13 11:27 AM
1

from google de·gen·er·ate /diˈjenərit/ Adjective: Having lost the physical, mental, or moral qualities considered normal and desirable; showing evidence of decline. Noun: An immoral or corrupt person. Verb: Decline or deteriorate physically, mentally, or morally.
/r/MensRights16/05/13 11:05 AM
1

Not only should she be suspended, hopefully permanently, but every case she has prosecuted, along with those of her superiors should be reevaluated with a fine tooth comb to look for indescrepencies.
/r/MensRights16/05/13 10:14 AM
2

Pretty sure this reporter will now be sent to report on sanitation, or some other unsavory assignment. He does know what paper he writes for, and what he just wrote broke all the rules of that papers talking points on male issues. Kudos for him, but I imagine he is now seen as a pariah by much of their staff. He should be proud.
/r/MensRights16/05/13 10:09 AM
3

Dammit, it be fake
/r/MensRights16/05/13 09:45 AM
1

Looking at your posts, I think you seem to overuse that word, which bit you in the ass in this circumstance. Cunt doesn't bother me because it is the counter to dick, which also doesn't bother me... And normally, degenerate would not bother me either, but in this case, we have to watch out as not to offend our supporters in the lgbt crowd. We need all the help we can get. Maybe it is best you find a different adjective :P
/r/MensRights16/05/13 09:41 AM
0

It means immoral, which is often used to describe the LGBT community.
/r/MensRights16/05/13 09:37 AM
1

Most feminists and women will say it disgusts them too, and they still turn a blind eye... because mein fuhrer gets them benefits
/r/MensRights16/05/13 01:57 AM
-3

There is all kinds of money trying to push women into STEM fields, and has been for decades. There is no discrimination in STEM against women. There might be resentment, because women in those fields are so highly sought after, and paid more for the same work, and companies bend over backwards to do everything they can to advance those women... Women CHOOSE to not go into STEM fields, and my guess is that the lack of interaction is why. Women, imo, do not find working on code for days/weeks by t…
/r/MensRights15/05/13 11:59 PM
1

I would say, divorce, and the complete destruction of their life and financial security, is what is causing it. Basically, the children are all grown, so the wife no longer 'needs' the husband, divorces him, and then he is responsible for keeping her in the lifestyle she was accustomed to for the rest of his life without any hope of ever achieving the lifestyle he was accustomed to. It is a big "eff you, I am outta here" move to spite the ex-wife, who would presumably have to find out how much f…
/r/MensRights15/05/13 11:43 PM
2

Even in sweden, where feminism completely won, Men overwhelmingly work, and women overwhelmingly stay home and raise kids until they are grown. It turns out, when you give women all the benefits and options necessary for them to return to work, they decide staying at home with the kids is more to their liking. Go figure.
/r/MensRights15/05/13 11:28 PM
3

Well, if history is any example, the feminists have a hell of a reckoning in their future. The German people still to this day bare the shame of their forefathers, 5 generations later. They were institutionally neutered. There is no doubt they are the strongest on almost all fronts in the EU, and still have to tip toe as not to offend. When feminism falls, it will fall very hard indeed.
/r/MensRights15/05/13 09:58 PM
-1

I am DV you for degenerate. That implies all kinds of things MRA's are against. We are cool with LGBT people.
/r/MensRights15/05/13 09:46 PM
2

Except for the occasional manhood academy nutter, I rarely see any real disrespect in this sub reddit. I see downvotes, but that is just disagreement... and real disagreement in opinion, articulated in a civil manner. I also do not see the censorship for differing views that you see elsewhere. The rudest I ever get is feewings instead of feelings, which is really just smarmy.
/r/MensRights15/05/13 09:39 PM
2

It is like saying the SS were not real Germans, all those normal citizens that just looked the other way as the SS committed the atrocities were.
/r/MensRights15/05/13 09:31 PM
1

Exactly. Feminism is an ideology. One that is only about women. If she is gender neutral, she should identify as a egalitarian. That is gender neutral.
/r/MensRights15/05/13 09:27 PM
2

"women's rights advocates are needed just to keep abortion legal." This is false. What is needed, is equality on that front. Tie a man's right to give up support for a child he does not wish with abortion, and abortion will never be threatened again. The reason abortion is under threat is simply because it is seen as a female only issue. With women split ~60%-40%, and abortion not even top 10 or 20 issue for men, that is why it is always under threat. Give men the right to give up responsibility…
/r/MensRights15/05/13 08:58 PM
-15

Been posted several times...
/r/MensRights15/05/13 10:56 AM
4

:D
/r/MensRights15/05/13 05:14 AM
2

Texas here, did the same
/r/MensRights15/05/13 05:09 AM
34

Run like the wind, I say. Find one without the baggage.
/r/MensRights15/05/13 04:55 AM
1

jews are not a race, they are a culture.
/r/MensRights14/05/13 11:36 PM
1

dont forget that the person receiving the 'hate' has to be a protected class.
/r/MensRights14/05/13 11:31 PM
2

She wasn't into tech. She was simply a fancily named marketer with a soapbox that was only hired because of her twitter followers, and subsequently fired because of how she used twitter. Seems like justice to me.
/r/MensRights14/05/13 11:29 PM
2

fortunately, they are also losing donors, so much so they are shutting down expenditures. They still have a sizable war chest, but do not expect growth. Selling hate like they do is just no longer popular. Thank goodness.
/r/MensRights14/05/13 11:27 PM
0

No, he seems to have an obsession with hating unqualified women in the military bringing his unit cohesion down and sees such a small % as capable that the money would be better spent elsewhere instead of training a sex that 99% cannot live up to the requirements... he has also done a pretty bang up job of creating serious doubt about your qualifications.
/r/MensRights13/05/13 11:25 PM
-4

I am all for it, but until women have greater strength in general or we have exobots carrying the load I don't see the practicality of it. How much weight with the armor and supplies do you have to be able to carry and march/climb mountains? There are no women mountains, just mountains and rugged terrain. Women foot soldiers are possible in rare circumstances, but so few would make the cut that the money is better spent giving you guys better equipment.
/r/MensRights13/05/13 11:14 PM
1

Need much more information. Where were they, what were they doing, were they making out, cuddling, did she have her pants on or is she just accusing him of sneaking up on her and shoving his hand down her pants. All this is relevant, especially if they were making out... as trying to touch her vagina and being told no in a make out session is far different than forcing a crotch grab out of nowhere. The 1st will go away on its own, the second needs to be defended against vigorously.
/r/MensRights12/05/13 11:41 AM
-3

Fuck, canada won't work because they are worse off on this front than we are... we can all just move to Mexico, get us some senorita's, make their army and industry elite, and eat taco's. I like taco's... do you like taco's? Leave all that China debt to the United States of Feminists, and crappy winters too. I would love to see the look on US and Mexican officials faces, if all the single 25-40 year old males immigrated to Mexico within a 2 year period. It would be the greatest boon Mexico could…
/r/MensRights12/05/13 06:49 AM
12

Get out of the military. Let the women have it all to themselves. Then laugh and eat cake as the generals and politicians shit their pants at what they have done.
/r/MensRights12/05/13 04:18 AM
5

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9FNenJN4484
/r/MensRights12/05/13 01:46 AM
2

How dare these boys want to play "girl" sports. Especially when they can join and immediately dominate in the sport.
/r/MensRights12/05/13 01:18 AM
3

Guy went into detail about how TED owns you for 2 weeks and tries to completely take control of all of your hours, makes you room with someone not of your choosing and promote all TED all the time. How he was kicked out of it for spending his cake day with his girlfriend, iirc... or maybe meeting someone else.
/r/MensRights12/05/13 01:14 AM
1

Libertarians are for liberty above all else, republicans and democrats are for government control because government knows best. If you think you are better off with people who want to take your liberty, you get exactly what you deserve. As I said, libertarians are not perfect, but when it comes to pandering, they do it the least.
/r/MensRights12/05/13 12:49 AM
1

http://www.comedycentral.com/video-clips/286ahf/reno-911--magic-missile should of used these
/r/MensRights11/05/13 07:31 PM
0

If you want to stop pandering, Libertarian is your best bet. It isn't perfect, but is far superior to democrats who pander to the politically correct, hurt no ones feewings sanitizers, or the Republicans who pander to the religious, we are all for your freedoms unless their magic book say's that freedom is wrong, and then we aren't.
/r/MensRights11/05/13 11:42 AM
1

It has to be looking. This flyer would do fuck all about changing administrators views. I am a guy who played all sorts of sports, and there was never a time when I needed anything shorter than knee high shorts (ok, maybe track, but the girls are basically wearing bikinis in that, and there was looking but no slut shaming). This has to be about guys noticing they are wearing more revealing clothing thus 'slut shaming' them by noticing. If there was overwhelming catcalls, or such, that would be m…
/r/MensRights11/05/13 06:30 AM
14

It sound to me like there is a dress code. Get used to dress codes. They will be with you in some form or another, the rest of your life. And guess what, crotch shorts and micro minis, are not allowed in workspaces. I wish they were. That is the gist of the flyer, you are just too young to comprehend it. It is the proverbial 747 flying over you white knight head. Guys like legs, have liked legs, and will continue to like legs until girls no longer have them. If you don't like legs, you are missi…
/r/MensRights11/05/13 05:44 AM
0

The looking is the shaming in the vast majority of cases. I can count the times on my hand, and I went to college 20 years ago when it was far more conservative than it is today, that there was any actual shaming that could be considered public. Merely that guys notice, and continue to follow these girls with their eyes, makes them a spectacle, and thus 'publicly shames' them. It has everything to do with looking.
/r/MensRights11/05/13 05:38 AM
6

Women can wear what ever they want, and men can look at them for doing so. See how that works?
/r/MensRights11/05/13 05:26 AM
15

We are not Iran(and their rules are far more about religious control), and last I checked, no guys I know are demanding girls wear more clothes. If anything, it is other jealous, bitter women who act shocked. And why do they get mad? Because their guy looks too. Also, last I checked, you don't get to decide what I find attractive. I, and only I am the sole decider of what I am attracted to. If I like ankles or inner thighs or knees, that is my choice, not yours. The gist of this flyer is that it…
/r/MensRights11/05/13 05:22 AM
1

What DA would charge him with theft if he were pleading his case on the internet first? They would seize the phone as evidence. It takes the evidence (which is irrefutable, under any reading of the law), and the will to do what it takes to see it through. Women are not allowed to attack under the law, and a preserving evidence defense would work on the phone. It does take knowing this info, though... and not wanting to "keep it real", especially in the most matriarchal society within the US... t…
/r/MensRights11/05/13 01:37 AM
2

that is why you grab the phone under "preserving evidence" reasons, make a b line to a computer and upload it where it cannot be deleted and then go to police station and file charges, wait for them to lie, and then demand they also get charged with falsifying a report to the police, post it here, and wait for win while eating ice cream. What was on that phone would be irrefutable evidence that all he did was protect himself from assault, and with the "I will bring the internet down on you if yo…
/r/MensRights11/05/13 01:28 AM
3

Then his buddy joining in. Nothing like a good gang bang beating, no? /s When they attacked him, he should have taught those two the lesson that equality hurts. It'd be the last attack they made.
/r/MensRights11/05/13 12:53 AM
1

That social rule exists... but just for males. I expect in the next 20 years, housing will be built from the ground up with 24/7 every room recording under the banner of "catching all of your families special moments", and that scares the shit out of me. People willingly already do this to themselves... We will all be on our own Truman Show.
/r/MensRights10/05/13 01:02 AM
13

It only took about 15 seconds for me to realize and reverse course. You need to get your white knight-dar recalibrated!
/r/MensRights10/05/13 12:55 AM
1

Pycon is a developer conference that a marketing guru named Adria Richards attended. While at said conference, she overheard 2 guys behind her talking to each other. One of the guys said something about a dongle, and Adria turned around because dongle was apparently a trigger word for her. She ignored it, but later overheard conversation from the same two guys about forking the repo of a developer giving a presentation. If you don't know a dongle is connector for a peripheral, and forking the re…
/r/MensRights09/05/13 11:03 AM
10

Dongle gate was a shit hitting the fan, every guy that knew about it called bullshit, scared the fuck out of the companies that overreacted, brought women who are actually in stem fields out of the woodwork to say she was not speaking for them and please quit setting them back with her victim pandering entitlement, kick to the groin to the overly politically correct world we live in victory. We should never forget about donglegate, because we made a stand and won on the merits and completely dem…
/r/MensRights09/05/13 08:07 AM
1

There is no legal trouble because he has no intention of pressing charges (because he is keeping it real) and because cops and the DA have no pressure on them to press any. If this was nationally picked up with a negative tone towards the women and a writing/calling bitch fest campaign inundating that police and DA office, files would be charged., even if he didn't want to cooperate. Whether the case would go far or they plead out is a different story. Again, in a situation where there is irrefu…
/r/MensRights09/05/13 05:02 AM
5

Not in my state, I suggest you move to a better one. You didn't record it so it would be highly unlikely you would charged with illegal recording, and since the recording was open for all to see and not hidden, I cannot think of a state where it would not be admissible. You are not the police, so the evidence is admissible even if stolen, only the law cannot do that, ask any investigative reporter who gets in no trouble for revealing stolen evidence which when it comes to light destroys a compan…
/r/MensRights09/05/13 02:49 AM
7

Two women would be laying on the floor with bloody faces whining about how I attacked them, if this happened to me. I would have immediately grabbed that phone for evidence, gone to the police station, filed charges and restraining orders. The evidence is irrefutable. At worst he'd face a theft charge. But police would just enter the phone as evidence. Women do this because they think they have a license to hit. I have a license to defend myself, and technology will be males great equalizer in c…
/r/MensRights09/05/13 12:33 AM
0

Seems to me the best thing to do is get out of the military asap. Let it be an all female, 'rape free' force. If they create a system of rules that unfairly targets the very people who risk their lives for said force... abandon the force, and let them turn it into a useless hen fest. Those rules will change very quickly when those who make the military what it is, are no longer interested because the deck is stacked against them.
/r/MensRights08/05/13 11:02 PM
1

Considering the source and their ilk considers a look or comment the equivalent of physical or sexual abuse: No.
/r/MensRights08/05/13 10:57 PM
4

Why wouldn't we be. There is a major kink in that theory though. It is, that men are less interested in marriage, and since women are getting the higher education, better jobs, and on and on... if women want to get married, sheer numbers suggest it will be them who have to drop their expectations, not the other way around. I mean, they don't... but that just means they are all fighting over the very few that meet their unrealistic standards.
/r/MensRights05/05/13 11:15 PM
7

Who said all? In many ways, I am a big fan of sluts. But it has been my experience, that they are often broken inside. In a way, they are chasing a dragon "to feel", and the sex is just a fix. It is not the "slutyyness" that makes the alarms in my head go into high alert. It is what causes that need. Sex does not have the same meaning to them that it does with me or other 'non sluts' I have been with. In many ways, it just seems like they are going through the motions, or dealing with an addicti…
/r/MensRights05/05/13 10:17 PM
49

Facts don't bullying
/r/MensRights05/05/13 08:48 PM
1

and with it, so is the feminists money, and power, which is why there are so many new forms of rape being invented
/r/MensRights04/05/13 08:44 PM
18

Suicides among men in their 50's jumped 50%. That is right at the age where one most likely cannot financially recover from a divorce that costs them half of their assets + continuing burden of alimony and child support. What a surprise.
/r/MensRights03/05/13 05:49 AM
2

Adriana couldn't code. She was marketing/public relations. Which is why she was so out of place.
/r/MensRights03/05/13 04:56 AM
5

Computer science and its related STEM fields are not social work spaces. The long hours and lack of interaction are, imo, the reason women are not going into STEM vocations. It is not because 'the menz are mean', but because when compared to a liberal arts or marketing career, that is all interaction, a job where you are mainly by yourself working on code or research or whatever, just looks boring compared to other fields available. The women who this work is appealing to, are highly sought afte…
/r/MensRights02/05/13 10:08 PM
3

she was doing great, until the unequal pay part. Have to drop her grade to a B+
/r/MensRights02/05/13 09:57 PM
2

Karma 1 Chunky Monkey 0
/r/MensRights02/05/13 05:55 AM
1

I wish there was "paper cut" paper, so you could, uh, booby trap the posters to give mean paper cuts :P Mind you, just paper cut level cuts, the kind that smart but leave no real damage.
/r/MensRights02/05/13 05:53 AM
2

not from what i am reading. He just seems to be implying that steroids is no more dangerous than morphine (heroine) when properly dosed. That the danger comes from taking more than should, and moreover, not knowing what you are taking. Taking a proper dose will still promote growth, more than taking nothing. It will just be the 5-10% bonus, instead of 30%+.
/r/MensRights02/05/13 12:39 AM
2

I'll check my opinion privilege, lol
/r/MensRights02/05/13 12:18 AM
2

plenty of people with allergies and asthma take steroids on a regular basis without ill effects. Abuse of steroids is what grow giant muscles, not proper dosage, which help inflammation and healing. The more you know.
/r/MensRights02/05/13 12:16 AM
4

have you seen many college refrigerator doors?
/r/MensRights01/05/13 11:29 PM
3

Are people actively looking for offence? Short answer: Yes, to justify their continuing existence.
/r/MensRights01/05/13 11:27 PM
14

Meh, just be glad you will probably never have to share the same air as her. And remember this golden rule. Women can do no wrong, because it is never their fault. If you are too nice and they cheat, it is your fault. If you are too fun, and they drop you for a provider... it is your fault. If... /s.
/r/MensRights01/05/13 11:26 PM
2

it apparently dulls males need to impress an attractive female during a financial exchange. Also clears acne and makes you less likely to think the world is out to get you, as a added bonus. TL;DR: Makes you less trusting, treats acne and schizophrenia.
/r/MensRights01/05/13 08:14 AM
1

I don't really have an inherent problem with the id check, it is the trickle down into every other aspect of life that is the problem, and how kids are never given the freedom to learn on their own. Like I said, I feel sorry for kids today. I used to be able to disappear for 4-5 hours at a time into fields and trails. That freedom no longer exists for most kids today because for sure a bogeyman will get them... which is far more hysteria than possibility.
/r/MensRights01/05/13 12:00 AM
1

By looking at statistics and seeing that, while there are more people than when you were young, there are statistically less bad people than ever. What there is, is a print and tv media that knows child abduction cases are a cash cow for them and continual fear mongering turns pages and keeps you glued to the tube. What we have is a society that no longer hides/sweeps child molestation under the rug, which is what used to happen when it was all safe in your childhood. It was not any safer in you…
/r/MensRights30/04/13 11:45 PM
4

I hope she gets hit by a diesel
/r/MensRights29/04/13 11:11 AM
5

I am glad you are on our side, glad you are a woman, and most glad you know your shit. I believe you to be our most effective mouthpiece. You will be listened to and invited places men will not. Thank you. I also concur that the libertarian party will be the easier to influence. At heart, they are mostly egalitarians. Well, at least compared to the republicans and democrats.
/r/MensRights29/04/13 08:29 AM
0

So, I am an ok looking guy... what you are saying, then, is, when ugly fatties hit on me I should destroy them as a person to save them from themselves. Ok. Done. I expect this will go off real well in the feminine circles I encounter.
/r/MensRights29/04/13 12:03 AM
0

If you do not want to be looked at, do not go out in public, or learn to ignore it. People look at me all day. I don't start fights, throw tantrums, or whine about how unfair it is... I recommend you learn to do the same. Because until we literally become a blind society, people will be looking at other people. Looking does not hurt anyone... If you are hurt by someone looking at you, you need to see a shrink, because the problem is within your head, not theirs.
/r/MensRights28/04/13 08:29 AM
3

All I know, is, if some jealous husband cut off his wife's tits and threw them in the disposal, he'd be getting death. I hope she gets the same. Make this a hate crime, move it to federal, and give her the needle.
/r/MensRights28/04/13 06:26 AM
7

Write the store, write the employee, write the newspaper, write the police department, write the district attorney, write the mayors office, write the city council who funds the police department, write the county departments that are relative, write the state attorney general... all with cc notification who all the letter went to. Then contact the local slimy tv news investigator. Make a shit storm. If you only contact the accused and his boss and show up in court, nothing will change. It will …
/r/MensRights28/04/13 04:52 AM
3

I think you are wrong there. True lesbian means, at least to me, a woman that has, is, and only will be attracted to other women, thus a "true" lesbian. The others can have a lesbian experience, but when I think lesbian, I think women who are only attracted to women. Otherwise they are bisexual, which encompasses lesbianism, but is different and thus its own thing.
/r/MensRights27/04/13 09:25 PM
3

depoprevera ?sp? shots, it is birth control shots that last 3 months. I guess you got it to stop your periods completely. I know that is a side effect. You said your lady parts are at war with you...
/r/MensRights27/04/13 11:28 AM
7

In college, that is something I noticed with what I believed to be the true lesbian women and not just the bisexual/experimental lesbians. The bisexuals all loved the gay men, but the girls I knew that, at least in my mind I pictured as being gay since they were kids, seemed to have little patience with the overly effeminate gay men. It was my experience that they got along much better with straight guys, could relate to me, and I could relate to them more than I could the bisexual or temporary …
/r/MensRights27/04/13 11:19 AM
1

What state are you in? I am in Texas. The easiest thing to do, and the one likely to garner the quickest growth in members is to look for radical feminist functions and protest them. This will help you gain members the fastest... if there is a new law going on the books that unjustly hurts men, write your local paper with an op ed and start an informal group and link it in the op ed. Look for father rights groups in your area and ask if you can volunteer or help out. Look for men/father group th…
/r/MensRights27/04/13 05:05 AM
3

I said no such things, I simply stated that women are far better at a hive mind/collective and they are. Guys are far more individualistic. That is one of our problems in furthering the cause. There is nothing wrong in being able to think in a collective, and there is nothing wrong thinking as an individual... but our problem here, imo, is we are a bunch of individuals who agree on topics, but do so individually. Do you think we don't? The MRM is all over the place, where as MA has a collective …
/r/MensRights27/04/13 04:21 AM
1

This is too logical for women. If you don't want your junk stared at, hide your junk.
/r/MensRights27/04/13 04:10 AM
7

I am really tired of these "men and women are exactly the same we just have different naught parts" lines. It is dishonest. Men and women are different. Admitting we are different does not in any way equate to us not being able to be equal. If perpetuating the lie that we are exactly the same as women is a goal in the MRM, then count me out. It is destined to fail, because everyone sees through lies. Guys, on the whole are more individualistic than girls who are far more concerned with what othe…
/r/MensRights27/04/13 03:46 AM
1

Or say how a black man got elected over a white woman, in a country where women are the majority and african americans represent only 17%. Oh, surprisingly, they agreed on almost all of the topics. Voters have shown again and again, when it comes time for the moment of truth, women, for whatever reason, don't trust other women as much as this article implies.
/r/MensRights27/04/13 12:20 AM
8

What stops us from being a cohesive movement, is that we don't have a hive mind. Men are individualistic by nature, where as women, and especially feminism are experts at group think. If you are going to make criticisms, at least base them in reality. We are not the red pill guys... they have the our way or the highway mindset, not us. No one prevents uplifting examples in this sub. Start posting some.
/r/MensRights27/04/13 12:11 AM
1

Found this bit of genius in the comments section "deleted • 16 hours ago Carolyn needs help. The professional kind 315 •Reply•Share › deleted deleted • 11 hours ago − Well, you would too if you were raped by a cartoon dog... Just saying."
/r/MensRights26/04/13 11:56 PM
0

But that is not my sexuality, it is my desire... and looking last time checked is not physical, and thus cannot be threatening. We live in a free society, one that allows you to dress how you wish, and one that allows me to look where I wish (within reason). There is no law against being rude, and while I am certainly not a proponent of rudeness, I am equally against the 'males should be ashamed of their desires' approach that is prevalent, today. We are a visual species, we always have been and…
/r/MensRights26/04/13 11:18 PM
2

I understand there was no cyber bulling in this situation, and from what I read in your link, none that would be illegal in that movie. Here is a crazy idea. Why not ban your kids from social media and other cyber influences until they are emotionally secure enough to handle what might be said in those places? Too much parenting required for that, I guess, huh? Lets just pass more laws. Laws that won't change the people, just shift the ire elsewhere. That will work, lol.
/r/MensRights26/04/13 08:09 PM
3

If we like boobs, and you make them easy for us to see, we are going to look... quite often even. I agree, we shouldn't stare... but I can glimpse all I want can I not :P If I think you are really pretty, is it rude for me to glimpse your face? I have caught many a girl staring longingly at a guy across the room. Should I have screamed how rude she was being? It never crossed my mind, I just smiled/smirked. Seen them doing it in the weight room when male friends were using the hamstring machine …
/r/MensRights26/04/13 07:59 PM
2

None of what I am reading would be against the law in any state in the US. Sorry, but again, the problem is not the bullying... it is the need to belong at all costs. Nerds used to just do their own thing. Parents need to instill that into kids again.
/r/MensRights26/04/13 07:49 PM
2

Look, her friends were calling her a slut behind her back, or even to her face... and while I dislike that, it is distasteful, it is human nature, always has been human nature and has just recently begun to cause suicide. We should take the shame out of the word, we should not punish those who use it. Cyber bullying is extremely specific and does not encompass what you seem to think it does. There is no state that anyone in this would have been charged with cyberbulling over this. The state cann…
/r/MensRights26/04/13 07:39 PM
2

It makes me feel sorry for girls. Guys will bloody each other's noses... but that heals rather quickly, girls look to destroy every ounce of that persons being. It reminds me of the LouisCK joke. "You can equate the bad that boys do to a dollar figure in damage to your house... but little girls like rip out your heart and shit in it..." or somesuch, lol.
/r/MensRights26/04/13 03:05 PM
-1

FTFY
/r/MensRights26/04/13 02:46 PM
1

it wouldn't be so bad if it was done individually. As in, I really see no problem any single guy, or girl, who heard what happened and thought to themselves she was a slut. The problem is, one girl gets pissed/feeling hurt/ jealous, and then makes it her lifes mission to get all her other girlfriends or anyone else she knows to think so too. It is that group think need that is the biggest problem. This a major difference between guys and girls. Guys don't get all of their other guy friends to ha…
/r/MensRights26/04/13 02:43 PM
1

/sarcasm
/r/MensRights26/04/13 02:26 PM
-3

it was the next morning when she first had regret, though... as it always is in these cases. I am sure that is when the "how to spin this" process began that lead to her becoming a victim.
/r/MensRights26/04/13 02:03 PM
7

Just the sheeple mentality we have come to expect from them. Individual thought is a threat to the feminist collective, and must be quashed at all costs.
/r/MensRights26/04/13 01:32 PM
10

Not long before the friend and mother who tried to get her to leave will be called "rape apologists" for not dragging her out against her will. All evidence points to a girl, who though she had been drinking, was where she wanted to be at the time, until the next morning when she realized the most vindictive people on the planet (her girlfriends) would label her a slut. So she decided to become a victim instead. What needs to happen is the end to slut shaming, and that will require other girls t…
/r/MensRights26/04/13 01:10 PM
12

Being his ex, and that she does not live there, doesn't it just become assault with a deadly weapon, and not "domestic violence"? Doesn't domestic violence mean violence between people who live together?
/r/MensRights26/04/13 11:21 AM
3

Sure, but free still beats cost. Not to mention, there is not much airbrushing going on in amateur these days :P
/r/MensRights25/04/13 07:00 AM
5

Since the dawn of the internet, the only reason to get playboy is because of the articles/interviews. Hell, even my dear old mom has commented that in the 70's/80s, she was fond of the articles. And she is very much a prude who did not approve of the pictures within.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 06:54 AM
2

It is not unfair to them. It is just the truth. The truth doesn't give a damn about fair. Guys created that space. Thus, it is a space with norms and a culture, that tilts to the masculine. There is no need for it to change. There are other areas people looking for this change can find their inclusion. If there will be change it should come from the actual community, not outside forces. Outside forces are the ones demanding change, not core gamers. Gaming is bigger than hollywood. No one is dema…
/r/MensRights24/04/13 11:39 AM
2

I am being very specific, though. I am talking about core games and core gamers, not videogames as a whole. Core games/gamers and the conventions and atmosphere and norms and values of that space were created by guys. It isn't that girls are not welcome, it is that this space has its own social norms, norms that have developed over a generation by the people who play those games, and those players are overwhelmingly guys, so the culture this space created is guy centric. I see no problem with th…
/r/MensRights24/04/13 11:19 AM
1

what i mean by that, though, is it is one of the last spaces where guys unabashedly can act however they want. They can talk shit, or not talk shit. That is what drives feminists so crazy about that world. Not so much, how guys treat women (though that can be a problem) but just how little influence they have over the space, and how the gamers really don't give a damn what they say, and for the most part, neither do the game makers. Their shaming tactics, literally fall on deaf ears. That core p…
/r/MensRights24/04/13 10:48 AM
2

where is all this vitriol coming from or did you reply to the wrong person. The best I can tell, we agree. Who said anything about trolling. I am of the opinion, all gamers get trolled regardless of gender...guys have just always been aware of it, girls... well, they don't seem to do well anytime or anyplace they get trolled. I want game developers to make the games they want without outside interference or pressures. Let the market decide.
/r/MensRights24/04/13 09:24 AM
3

Yeah, icewind dale had romance options, but they were just distractions, if anything... but nowadays, bioware makes all of their games melrose place soap opera's. I wont be surprised if in the future their covers/ads resemble fabio romance novels. Thank goodness for valve and cd project red.
/r/MensRights24/04/13 07:48 AM
3

Anita wanted 6k. No one cared. Then she became a troll on 4chan, and irritated them, so they did what they do to anyone who annoys them, and griefed the shit out of her, which she then used to play herself as the poor hapless victim, then the money started rolling in. I have no problem if games begin to be made for women. I wish them well. I have a problem when the games I love, are changed/diminished/lessened to attract women so that I don't want to play them anymore, and surprise, surprise wom…
/r/MensRights24/04/13 06:32 AM
2

"Police were investigating what her motive was" I am going to make a guess that she was a crazy ass psycho.
/r/MensRights24/04/13 05:45 AM
1

Huh, I thought god just liked to bet.
/r/MensRights24/04/13 05:38 AM
2

Yeah... that is the problem. Guys see rape as rape. Girls see anything that makes them uncomfortable (and that is one long list) as rape. Haven't touched a bioware game since they ruined dragon age. It is a shame such a vaunted developer lost their way, so badly. They lost me in the process. It cracks me up. They blame it all on homophobia. I don't remember any complaints about the possible gay romance that could be had in DA. But when every character becomes gay possible, it goes from being nor…
/r/MensRights24/04/13 05:19 AM
2

That is the proverbial wrench in their ideology. If men and women are equal, then both should be held responsible for their actions. But only the menz are to blame, where alcohol is involved... not the womenz. It is the catch 22 that proves they themselves must not believe women are equal. Womenz just can't be held responsible for getting wasted. Anyone who does is a rape apologist.
/r/MensRights24/04/13 05:05 AM
2

Are you a fan of the crowd sourcing method? It still doesn't generate the 50+ million type budgets other AAA games get, but I really like what I am seeing come from there. I have my fingers crossed that these games are delivered as promised. Much of the problem, is the mega publishers (except valve) are beholden to stockholders who really only care about profits. On the surface, that sounds great. But in practice, it just seems they meddle far too much always trying to include this or that demog…
/r/MensRights24/04/13 02:56 AM
5

No worries, mate. I like walls of text. What concerns me, is that there is this push to feminize core games, much like there is a push to feminize STEM fields. Much like the STEM fields, I just don't see a time where a large percentage of girls will become core gamers. If you are a developer, you know efforts are being made to get female coders, and have been for some time. How exactly is that working out? From what I read, not too well. Not because women are incapable, but because those fields …
/r/MensRights24/04/13 02:35 AM
3

they just sent actual bombs at erin... where there is smoke, there is usually a bit of fire.
/r/MensRights24/04/13 01:40 AM
4

I am all for the market deciding. Look what that market did to Bioware, who pandered. They were a company that could do no wrong. Now, no one wants to buy their games. I want game developers to make the games they want, that is all I have ever wanted. But, everything is casualized to the lowest common denominator now a days, so no one is offended, and all the demographics are met. Thank goodness for kickstarter. That looks like the best way to get games in the future. Instead of some EA suit dec…
/r/MensRights24/04/13 12:40 AM
8

at best, they represent 10% of the market... that just is not plenty to me, or anyone else who understands math.
/r/MensRights24/04/13 12:30 AM
7

Have you ever heard guys complain about male characters, though? I worry about the game part first and foremost, the story is a distant second. If the game is not fun, I won't continue, no matter how good the story is. Games are progressing just fine without outside factors pushing for this or that. Characters are getting better, and have been. But when crap is shoehorned in to appease this or that minority, it affects the quality of the game. Why do we need it to not be? It is one of the few pl…
/r/MensRights24/04/13 12:18 AM
8

again, I am speaking of the CORE GAMING sector. One more time: CORE GAMING. That is 90% male. Not gaming, which incorporates scrabble, hearts and farmville, but core gaming. You have lost your frikken mind if you think women represent more than a blip in these buyers. I go yearly to Quakecon... a core gaming convention. How many women are there playing games? Maybe 100 out of a 5k lan. The best part is the "professional female gamers" talk about a laugh. They may be pro for women, but the averag…
/r/MensRights23/04/13 10:50 PM
8

That is the thing, though. Valve decided to make games like that. No one forced their hand. Alex was a great female character. Not that girls played HL2. Let the game developers make what they want.
/r/MensRights23/04/13 10:33 PM
11

Oh, because those male characters have always been so well developed and deep. LOL. The point of games is the game part. I don't buy a game because I am looking for a soap opera. There is enough of that everywhere else. If you are a game developer then you know guys make up 90% of "core" gamers. Games in this category are thus, designed and developed for a male audience, and will continue to be, just as those crap romance novels in supermarkets are designed for women. You make your product for y…
/r/MensRights23/04/13 10:24 PM
9

We have a different view of "plenty" then. Again, when I say games, I do not mean casual tripe. That is what women play. That is what constitutes the "47%" figure that is typically bantered around. Girls do not play core games... guys play them. Bioware tried to make games girls would play, and look what happened to them. They lost their core audience, and did not gain girls. I am of the view you let the game makers make the games they want to make.
/r/MensRights23/04/13 10:18 PM
5

The spectacle of it makes me smile. This is the one weapon we (well, the male members of MRA/MRM) can dominate in. Humor is not something they can counter. It really is kryptonite to 3rd wave rad fem. They are too caught up in their feewings, to be able to laugh at themselves. It causes a short/BSOD in their operating systems. They either go into rage or shutdown mode.
/r/MensRights23/04/13 09:28 PM
-2

Games are make believe... they are also the last bastion of maleness. Femenist's don't play games (i mean core games, not farmville tripe) and neither do women for the most part. It is amusing to watch them bitch, and gamer's just completely ignore them, and game companies also ignore them. Don't get me wrong... some companies will try and capitulate... Like the once great bioware. But guess what happens when they do? Gamer's quit buying their games and ridicule them, and they then become a laug…
/r/MensRights23/04/13 09:22 PM
0

You have the right to flee when you are attacked, you have no freedom of speech, it does not exist in your country... if someones feewings are hurt, you can be prosecuted. Common law does not protect you from shit, it also does not allow you to protect any of your shit. I am sorry, but from an american perspective, where rights are well known and protected, you do not have any.
/r/MensRights23/04/13 09:14 PM
1

There is a difference between serving and fighting. AFAIK, the female brigade has only been deployed 1 time. And that was under very controlled, safe, circumstances. It is not that women cannot aim a gun and shoot, it is that they cannot carry the weight necessary to keep the gun loaded and them deployed and mobile.
/r/MensRights23/04/13 09:07 PM
3

In the UK, people actually have no rights, per se. There is no constitution or anything like a Bill of Rights. So, when I say they have no rights, I am not joking. Freedom of speech, does not exist.
/r/MensRights23/04/13 08:37 PM
9

The next MRA get together that will be protested up in toronto, all the attendees should wear big glasses and bright red wigs. Go in camouflage, so to speak. Humor should also be one of our weapons.
/r/MensRights23/04/13 08:15 PM
3

Yep, just because they made bad decisions in their 20's when they were desirable, doesn't mean I need to make a bad decision in my mid 30's. I have every right to pass up a damaged mid 30's woman just looking for an easy life, for someone without all the damage and miles on them. Those women made their own beds. It is not my job to repair it.
/r/MensRights22/04/13 11:05 PM
0

Whether she kept it on principal or choice, it is ultimately her decision. I think the guy is being more than reasonable, financially. She too bares responsibility in this, knew she was hooking up with a married man, and then knew he would not be taking a part in the kids upbringing. If he puts in $12k and she reciprocates (Paralegals are some of the highest wage earners, shouldn't be a problem) that will more than cover all of that childs needs plus a college fund. Peoples reaction in that thre…
/r/MensRights22/04/13 08:35 AM
3

Penguins are another species where the male hears their offspring's cries
/r/MensRights22/04/13 03:47 AM
1

Another punish the grandson, for his great-great-grandfather's mistake view. Is it wrong for me to send mind missiles at these people?
/r/MensRights21/04/13 11:00 PM
1

This reminds me of the Sweden study. Sweden is a country where Feminism won. They have gender neutral teaching from preschool on. Men and women both get the option to take 18 months off with 80% salary after a child is born. They each, also, both get the option to work only 5 hours a day until their child is 10. These options reset with each additional child. They also have excellent childcare and preschool funded by the government. Basically, everything any feminist has ever dreamed of. Unfortu…
/r/MensRights21/04/13 10:23 PM
2

I think he is supportive. As in, look at what danger he is in by being written about. Oh noes, words.
/r/MensRights21/04/13 09:53 PM
-4

Because a certain percentage of women are incapable of understanding context.
/r/MensRights21/04/13 09:40 PM
1

i don't have it but have seen it, and it basically says "when 2 people in a partnership have a license to hit, there is a lot of hitting" lol.
/r/MensRights21/04/13 04:46 AM
1

Well, you would probably be a better judge at that than most... espanol is what it will be written in for argentina (not portugese, right?) and even though I live in Texas, I just know enough spanish to bribe mexican cops or get myself into a fight :P. I'd imagine some sort of .gov for argentina is the place to look.
/r/MensRights21/04/13 04:45 AM
1

Did what i could countering the usual tripe from MissRepresentation, but that b is a batshit fucking crazy misandrist who just spreads the typical anti MRA lies, quotes Elam out of context and then just disappears when she is backed into a corner by logic. Logic is a misandrist's kryptonite!
/r/MensRights21/04/13 01:06 AM
2

I have read that the reason babies and women have high pitched cries is specifically so the male cannot tune them out. That they are an evolutionary trait designed to set off the fight or flight response in men. Thus, men waking up to a baby screaming is no surprise.
/r/MensRights20/04/13 06:51 AM
2

Scottish men are ice makers?
/r/MensRights18/04/13 12:50 AM
1

This may not be popular, but, if you vaccinate all the girls in canada, there is a cumulative effect carried over to the boys. While penile and anal cancer can still happen to boys, their occurrence is much lower than cervical cancer and abnormal pap smears in girls. While I salute you for getting your son vaccinated, adverse effects to males from hpv are much lower than that of girls, making the shot vaccination more optional. ~2% of the population is gay, and it usually is not a surprise to mo…
/r/MensRights17/04/13 11:49 PM
3

Nothing wrong being comfortable if there are plenty of extra seats.
/r/MensRights17/04/13 07:47 AM
3

you mean brite :P
/r/MensRights17/04/13 06:47 AM
-5

He should scalp her... some tickets to the next MRA event in his area :P
/r/MensRights17/04/13 03:52 AM
3

Zara used our playbook for half of her speech, and the best Natalie could counter is "The problem isn't men, i have one at home"... lol.
/r/MensRights16/04/13 10:40 PM
2

If you were Erin, and the UK police demand they protect you, because they have evidence you are under threat, and an actual bomb was found sent to you, who would YOU think it was. The difference, here is that the 4channers are like a terrorist group that hates dogs, and is known to go around and shoot them. But instead of blaming the obvious culprit (4channers) the fems are blaming MRA's out of convenience.
/r/MensRights16/04/13 07:44 PM
1

Simply make it well known, you have changed your philosophy. That all violence, will be met by you with equal violence. You have read too many articles with guys ending up stabbed, or whatever, that the limiter you have had on regarding response, is now removed. Make it well known. Guy...girl, they come at you with violence, you will meet them with same. I bet violent women diminish much in your future. It has in mine, though they do throw tantrums about it when it is explained to them. But peop…
/r/MensRights16/04/13 06:01 AM
1

Any polling I have ever seen, show that women, when being honest in anon self polls, admit to much higher abuse... but since their abuse almost never leaves any physical marks... IIRC, there is a Politically Incorrect where Richard Lewis is whacked in the chest by a female writer right there on national tv. The only person offended by this, seems to be Richard Lewis... who does actually make a somewhat big deal about it. Everyone just shrugs it off though, with Maher doing his best to smooth thi…
/r/MensRights16/04/13 05:44 AM
3

Be proactive with the other friends and simply state to them, you kicked her out, she is feeling rejected and vindictive, you are in a happier place. Look, some people are going to believe her because they prefer to believe her, there is nothing you can do about that. Simply stated, most people (if you have never been accused of being violent before) will believe she is just being hateful. Move on with your life, and don't look back at anyone who doesn't care to hear your side. They were never y…
/r/MensRights16/04/13 05:38 AM
3

Not only record in written form, check your local laws. We all have voice recorders in our pockets. Many states have no problem with a person recording their conversations without others knowing. While the big brother aspect of everything recorded at all times, scares the hell out of me, it also allows for evidence of mistreatment to be at everyone's fingertips. Graduated as a technical writer... needless to say, I completely understand your frustration with female dominated work spaces. At leas…
/r/MensRights15/04/13 11:26 PM
5

Fuck this. I'm starting a cult. There will be drugs. as long as it isn't speed based, count me in :P
/r/MensRights15/04/13 08:02 AM
5

I would say it has a lot more to do with Teaching Bias than Teacher Bias.
/r/MensRights14/04/13 09:57 PM
0

And in high end restaurants and boutiques, one finds predominantly male staff... gays, so I guess, best of both worlds.
/r/MensRights14/04/13 08:58 PM
1

Maybe you should look them up. People know what they mean. PUA pick up artist, MGTOW men going their own way
/r/MensRights14/04/13 08:35 PM
9

Pretty people of both genders have an advantage in employment opportunities. She was a marketer, not a coder. When it comes to coding, the code matters most.
/r/MensRights14/04/13 11:07 AM
4

when 2 out of 3 are because of boredom or lack of commitment in some way, I think I have a pretty strong case that no fault, unequitable divorce is the major cause, no? This is the gist of my whole argument. The reason men don't want to marry, is because the risk is too high.
/r/MensRights14/04/13 10:40 AM
2

All of my lawyer friends who say it equals about 1/3rd combined. Can I see your stats that say otherwise? You do know claiming abuse is in the how to file for divorce if you are a woman playbook, right?
/r/MensRights14/04/13 10:02 AM
6

I don't know about you, but i didn't play house, or dress dolls, or plan weddings or even think about them when I was a kid. All of my dreams were not about family life, they were awesome things a family life precludes you from doing. I have friends who completely live through their children. All of their free time is spent going to this practice, or this activity, or this socialization for their kids. They are frikken predator drone parents, always with them because they no longer have any ener…
/r/MensRights14/04/13 09:59 AM
6

cheating and abuse are actually very low causes of divorce and evenly split between the sexes, lack of commitment is the problem and the no fault divorce is the cause. Guess what pushed for no fault divorces, and why women initiate 70% of them.
/r/MensRights14/04/13 09:37 AM
7

Having half of all my stuff, plus a good portion of any retirement benefits plus the chance to continue paying out until I die (32 years would put me ~70) doesn't sound too good. Give me fault divorces and equitable splits, and I'll listen, otherwise your "average" case sounds like an early grave.
/r/MensRights14/04/13 09:35 AM
11

ok, 43%... wow, that is so much better, so slightly less than half. I mean, that is almost like there are no poison berries in the bunch. I know this much, I don't gamble in casinos on games where I only have a 43% chance to win. Why the hell would I risk all I have earned on those odds.
/r/MensRights14/04/13 08:49 AM
8

You would have seen a bump, yes, there may have been a gap of 5-10 years, but that bump would have happened. It did not. Not only that, the drop continued. Divorce rate ~ 50%. That is an awful lot of poison berries to choose from.
/r/MensRights14/04/13 08:33 AM
15

You know, it is funny. I have buddies... some single, some not, some divorced. Whenever the never been married guys hang out with the divorced and married... afterwards, when we talk amongst ourselves, it just looks liked the divorced guys are shell shocked and the married guys are all really tired. It never makes me think "that looks awesome". For 15 years I have felt like this, without knowing there was any sort of movement, from MRA's to GGTOW, et al. I wrote papers in college about paternity…
/r/MensRights14/04/13 08:25 AM
-2

I wouldn't say I take the PUA approach, but I do seem to end my relationships within 3-6 months. While this is not perfect (and let me say, the ending is always my idea, and very rarely goes well, but hey, they all want to get married, and as it stands, I do not) I do get the companionship and caring. I understand the hardcore MGTOW's, I just stop it at cohabitation. Right now in my life, that limit meets my needs. Maybe further down the road I may become more jaded or focus more on my hobbies/b…
/r/MensRights14/04/13 08:03 AM
6

Semantics. It is kinda the same thing, is it not.
/r/MensRights14/04/13 07:40 AM
8

A bit of context. These are not my numbers, but they can be verified here: http://nationalmarriageproject.org/ Basically, I got into an argument in politics, with the typical feminist saying that the reason men weren't getting married was because they were just "grown manchildren" blah, blah, blah. Which got me to look at recent marriage rates, which brought me to here: http://do-not-marry.com/dnmforum/forum/index.php?topic=1043.0 which lead me to these numbers. While I don't believe the numbers…
/r/MensRights14/04/13 07:14 AM
23

It doesn't sound wrong at all, nor should it. Act like a man, I will treat you like one. I have found that if you make this very clear, the chances a woman hits you drops dramatically. I have had this view since a buddy who refused to hit ended up with a knife in his chest (below collarbone, he was ok). And have made it well known ever since that it was now my philosophy. The tantrums women have thrown when it was discussed in group conversations are very telling. I am absolutely no threat to an…
/r/MensRights13/04/13 10:39 PM
12

I am saying all men know women think it is their licence. Not that all of them use it, but they all know nothing will happen if they do. Knowing there will be no repercussions to doing something wrong, has a tendency to make one do wrong. Thus women hit men at a far, far higher rate than the opposite.
/r/MensRights13/04/13 10:31 PM
1

There is one problem with all of your examples. They are comedies. Comedy is a male specialty, as Christopher Hitchens said. Guys are much more self deprecating, and far less likely to take ribbing as a slight. I would much rather have goofy, funny guys that actually act like men, than anal retentive prissy men who act like 13 year old bossy girls. If that is what you are looking for, watch The Big Bang Theory, and you should get your fill.
/r/MensRights13/04/13 07:25 PM
61

All guys know this is true. Women think they have a licence to hit.
/r/MensRights13/04/13 07:07 PM
1

Not every boy does well in a competitive environment and some girls would do better in that environment. But we know for certain, that in general boys did much better back 30 years ago when classes were were much more competitive. For an example, I will use video games. In general, who is better at video games? There should be no pride or slight, because in the grand scheme of things, video games are extremely meaningless. And by video games, I don't mean farmville or scrabble online, I mean hyp…
/r/MensRights13/04/13 06:14 PM
4

I bet the author hates her last name
/r/MensRights13/04/13 10:05 AM
3

It is more than just a problem of male teachers. It is how the male teachers are taught to teach. It really won't matter who is teaching, if they are all using the same techniques. Boys excel in competitive teaching environments, girls do not. We teach, in a manner, that benefits girls. And any male teacher, fresh out of college, teaches the same way as a woman would.
/r/MensRights13/04/13 06:41 AM
3

Most men here do not like the radical feminism that is in control of feminism today. Most men here, realize feminism has pretty much accomplished all of their goals and are instead trying to punish the grandchildren for their grandfathers mistakes. The people in control of feminism today, are no longer looking for equality. They have equality. What they want, is the advantage of their historical privileges to stay intact, and to demonize men for any choice they make that hinders their power. A w…
/r/MensRights13/04/13 06:34 AM
1

You might really try and change the title. Trying to make sense of it makes my head hurt.
/r/MensRights13/04/13 06:18 AM
1

How about we just admit that there are no more pedophiles today than there ever were statistically speaking. We just live in an interconnected world where pedo stories are hot commodities in the media, and it is not covered up as family shame like it used to be. I am not a threat to your child nor am I a pervert looking to take upshots just because I am a male.
/r/MensRights13/04/13 06:14 AM
2

It always amuses me which articles the NYT allows comments on, and which it does not.
/r/MensRights13/04/13 06:08 AM
1

You don't get to attack tropes, and then somehow have a teflon shield against the blatant tropes you yourself project. Women are not core gamer's. It isn't this trope or that trope that keeps them from being core gamer's. Core gamer's play games for the 'game' aspect. That is why core gamer's are male (90%+?). It is about meaningless competition. The story, historically, was an afterthought. Most of her examples are games from 10-20 years or more ago. In gaming's early period, where the story wa…
/r/MensRights13/04/13 04:15 AM
42

This bitch deserves all the embarrassment, and emotional devastation this being so public will cause her. Any women should damn her, and disavow her forever over her pettiness. Blatantly made up rape cases like this, hurt everyone who really is raped. We all (feminists, mra's and egalitarians) should unite against cunts like this. But I am sure plenty of people will come to her defense. Those people, are the enemy of all sane people.
/r/MensRights13/04/13 12:48 AM
2

The thing I have always found so funny about this situation, is that if men got the right to not be financially responsible for a child, abortion would never be threatened again. As it stands, there is very little reason for men to make abortion a priority in their voting habits. Add Legal Paternal surrender to it, and it immediately becomes a top 5 voting issue to men... but women would have to give up advantage to get this certainty... and we know how women view giving up any advantage.
/r/MensRights12/04/13 06:58 PM
1

In a way it sux, but he is kind of living the dream, in a way too. His wife does well, so financially they are ok, he has a screw in his foot, but elbow is just a fracture so no cast or anything on it. He is basically just having to sit in his lazy chair and netflix all day with his wife doting on him when she is home. It could be a lot worse :P
/r/MensRights12/04/13 06:20 PM
1

Accepted. :P Don't blow me up, ok? ;) I like most cops, most soldiers, a few politicians, and gasp... even a couple of bankers!
/r/MensRights12/04/13 05:36 AM
1

there was no reason for you to get downvotes... idiots is all I can think. Reddit is full of them.
/r/MensRights12/04/13 05:35 AM
1

Where did I claim any number? I am just telling you why there is a general distrust of police. I said nothing about 80%, that was someone else. There is zero logical fallacy in saying there is distrust of police, politicians, and even soldiers. Try again.lol Give up, you have lost. What we have here is a soldier who is fubar in his argument.
/r/MensRights12/04/13 05:26 AM
1

Soldiers are not normal citizens, neither are politicians or police officers. They are all given powers by the state, and entrusted with upholding the law/military code. When they abuse that, and then cover up the abuse, or abuse by others, all suffer a loss in the public's trust. You have said nothing that indicates otherwise.
/r/MensRights12/04/13 05:08 AM
1

By ruining my countries image abroad by taking part in war crimes. Next? Again, this is about holding people given power to a higher standard. It is not so much that one soldier or 50 do wrong, it is the vast numbers afterwards, from fellow soldiers to military higher ups, to politicians covering it up and lying about it. It has a cumulative effect of distrust, one that is deserved.
/r/MensRights12/04/13 04:58 AM
2

But when people in positions of power, a power given to them from the citizenry, break that trust, they deserve the citizens wrath... and when their fellows look the other way, they become part of the problem, not the solution. The op was about cops... you brought up soldiers (also people with guns, and thus power), i said nothing about ordinary citizens, or mothers and fathers, or kids... My examples were people who are granted power by citizens or who have organizational power such as feminist…
/r/MensRights12/04/13 04:34 AM
2

he left out the "what constitutes" part. " Unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, and other verbal or physical conduct of a sexual nature constitute sexual harassment when: submission to such conduct is made either explicitly or implicitly a term or condition of an individual's employment, submission to or rejection of such conduct by an individual is used as the basis for employment decisions affecting such individuals, or such conduct has the purpose or effect of unreasonably i…
/r/MensRights12/04/13 04:26 AM
2

I believe the supreme court has weighed in on this issue, and it was ruled that one could ask another out on a date/make sexual advances, even if the person asking is in a position of power... however, in this situation, where the person in power is insinuating that if he told anyone it could negatively affect his job... then all the hurdles necessary for harassment have been cleared.
/r/MensRights12/04/13 04:22 AM
2

soldiers,cops,politicians...people in positions of power, a power instilled by the people, deserve the publics distrust when they overlook the ills of their peers. Do you think this distrust is undeserved? There is a simple solution, quit looking the other way. seems to me they are unfortunately, too caught up in the code, to fix the problem. and so here we are... where we have been, since power was given to them and they misused it the first time all those centuries ago. they still have not lea…
/r/MensRights12/04/13 03:51 AM
4

I was arguing with a swedish feminist about how swedish women actually accomplish less career wise because when given a choice, and all the childcare/help necessary, they still choose overwhelmingly to take 16 mos off after birth, then return to only 5 hr workdays for the next 8 years, they are too far behind their male counterparts (fathers) who decided not to take all of that time off to get upper management jobs. Her solution was to mandate that the fathers be forced to take the same time off…
/r/MensRights12/04/13 03:35 AM
2

The problem with cops is the 'good' cops cover for the 'bad' cops which rightfully sullies all of their reputations. It reminds me much of the feminist code.
/r/MensRights12/04/13 03:21 AM
6

A buddy of mine recently fell from a roof (he is a framer) and broke his right elbow and right foot. Now he leans to the right :P While not heavy construction, per se, still dangerous. These women are really missing out.
/r/MensRights12/04/13 03:03 AM
1

Pretty much. Everything involving women is an emotional minefield of toes not to be stepped on. Guys are just looking for the fastest way to get the shit done, fuck the feelings.
/r/MensRights12/04/13 12:29 AM
4

Have fun, and talk hard!
/r/MensRights11/04/13 04:22 PM
0

You could use her face, to put makeup on 50 other women's face, just by pressing it against their skin. Talk about a trope. "oh noes, the boys are not being nice to her, lets go rescue this damsel in distress..." and there is her being the very trope she is complaining about too, lol.
/r/MensRights11/04/13 04:19 PM
2

quit attacking your sons for the wrongs of your grandfathers
/r/MensRights11/04/13 12:54 AM
2

"When people ask me I say, "I am a feminist, I believe men and women should be treated equally under the law." It would be easier to just say you are an egalitarian, would it not?
/r/MensRights11/04/13 12:50 AM
7

So wait... this article is saying that, when every single advantage is given to women, the vast, vast majority still chose to work less, and gasp, be around their children? That women would rather not work as much as men? That damn patriarchy is just invincible. Even when it is completely legislated away, the womens still don't act like the mens? Huh. I guess there is really only one solution. Legislation must be created that prevents the mens from acting like mens. /s
/r/MensRights10/04/13 05:07 PM
1

It doesn't really apply here. This is more a case of the wife's family coming at him to reclaim the dowry, or lie about him trying to harass them for more dowry, since he was a bad earner and that would free the wife... at least as far as i can tell. Maybe an indian can better explain?
/r/MensRights10/04/13 07:28 AM
3

If they suspend, you immediately go to the press and the school board will wilt. If it is well documented you were doing this only to prove a point, you will be golden either way.
/r/MensRights10/04/13 04:29 AM
5

She won't lose her job, but she will learn what is and is not appropriate, and receive the necessary disciplinary response she won't get otherwise. She blew off his concerns. She was given a chance. Now she can get the justice her type likes to dish out.
/r/MensRights10/04/13 04:23 AM
7

White people smell like wet puppies (i am white, by the way). Indians smell like curry. The Vietnamese could smell american soldiers because they milk products/mint, which changed the smell of their sweat... point is, people of different cultures do smell different. Not that that is a bad thing. I think it is far worse to pretend it is a lie. Might not be a good joke, but there is much truth to us all smelling different.
/r/MensRights10/04/13 12:50 AM
7

Afterwards, if she ever said anything about it reply "You told me to lighten up, so I lit you up. I feel so much lighter now. How about you?" And then just stare her down. Too ballsy for a high school kid, I am sure, but the look on her face would be worth it. Maybe demand she write an apology letter to every male student in her classes. It could just be piled on and on, lol. It won't... but it could.
/r/MensRights10/04/13 12:35 AM
6

document here that you are doing it to prove a point and the teacher will get suspended.
/r/MensRights09/04/13 11:20 PM
5

The OP found it offensive, and that is all it takes. I live by the view, that if you replace x and y with black and white, and it is offensive, it is equally offensive using genders. Not to mention, if the genders were reversed all hell would have been loosed.
/r/MensRights09/04/13 11:17 PM
24

Humor is not belittling every male when they look at the chalkboard. It is one thing to have a "can't understand opposite gender" joke, it is quite another to imply males are 1/5th as capable as a female.
/r/MensRights09/04/13 11:02 PM
28

Do what they would do, take a photo, and then contact your local paper and have them investigate. Maybe grab one of those slimy local tv news investigators. Best part is, it will be so loud she will be unable to attack you. You might even cause enough stink that the teachers all have to get training on sexism. Say it is sexual harassment. They would, and it will get more play. Maybe mention this as an example of the war on boys in the classroom. Feminists have a playbook. Nothing wrong using it …
/r/MensRights09/04/13 10:35 PM
10

The very people bitching about this were the most likely to comment that Obama or Willy were handsome.
/r/MensRights07/04/13 04:46 AM
3

ac/dc I presume?
/r/MensRights07/04/13 03:20 AM
0

The thing about communism, is, on paper it looks great. The problem with communism, is, in real life, it sucks ass. Sure, one day, in a star trek like universe, where there is abundant resources and replicators and holodecks, communism might actually work. But until then, those in charge simply take advantage of those below them, without any ability for those less fortunate to improve their lot in life. The problem with communism, is it completely negates individuality. In a Utopian world, where…
/r/MensRights05/04/13 11:03 AM
5

Well written, logical argument. Expect to be labeled a woman hater, rapist and part of teh patriarchy. That his how some factions of the feminist movement react when they are met with reason. Unreasonably.
/r/MensRights05/04/13 10:49 AM
17

Don't be the word police, that is their tactic, not ours. There is nothing wrong with how I wrote my sentence.
/r/MensRights05/04/13 08:00 AM
12

Was so hoping they were just really big Punky Brewster fans. Knew it was a long shot. These women would never watch a show about an orphaned girl raised by a single male foster parent.
/r/MensRights05/04/13 07:04 AM
56

Their version of feminism looks very ugly
/r/MensRights05/04/13 06:46 AM
0

I upvoted u back to normal. There are some real douches here that dv for no effing reason.
/r/MensRights04/04/13 11:48 PM
2

You are not your friends! She is your mommy, not theirs... they can be creepy about her :P
/r/MensRights04/04/13 05:31 PM
2

That is creepy, even if you are pan sexual. "Mom is attractive, pretty, etc" not creepy, "Hot, smoking, spicy, doable" all creepy.
/r/MensRights04/04/13 04:59 PM
6

This topic has already been posted, but the most telling thing of the study is this, as you imply "carried out a survey of 27 men and 81 women"
/r/MensRights04/04/13 04:29 PM
0

This is pretty pathetic. Oh noes, the menz live longer.
/r/MensRights04/04/13 04:03 PM
2

guys going their own way, should have been men /mgtow http://www.reddit.com/r/mgtow http://www.mgtow.com/
/r/MensRights04/04/13 05:59 AM
1

What is most convincing is staying on message, and not falling into a negative tone. Stay positive, and meet ad hom attacks with thanks. After all, those replies do us a great service. They prove we are dealing with facts and they are dealing with emotions. We are like the tide, and the moon is in our favor. Stay on message, and no shore will stop us.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 10:47 PM
3

The problem with women combat roles, is, ~85% are incapable of throwing a grenade beyond the point where it kills them and their whole platoon. They cannot move equipment or ammo because it is to heavy. They can't carry enough equipment to support their own needs during a deployment. The problem with female combat troops is that the list of what they can't do, is far larger than the list of what they can. Holding an m16 and aiming is such a small part of what being a soldier today is about, and …
/r/MensRights03/04/13 10:33 PM
2

They come from the 'ME' generation, so I would not hold my breath. X-gen grunge girls did seem a lot cooler to me, than girls today, though.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 10:17 PM
13

On this topic, I have noticed that men always, and I mean always say "thank you" when I hold the door open for them. Women... 1 in 3, if I am lucky (not that I do it for the thanks, but I still notice.) I live in Texas, and I hold the door open for anyone within a certain distance. Just the way I was taught. I have also had an occasional freak out by a woman. But, I just ignore it. I have better things to do then worry about her karma. Mine is doing just fine.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 10:16 PM
13

This is an unfortunate truth. If you want to be taken seriously, you have to sound and write properly. My bane is the auto correct function of phones.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 05:48 PM
4

81 women and 27 males in a study does not prove shit
/r/MensRights03/04/13 04:53 PM
2

Bill is not in favor of hitting women in that clip. He just say's "There are a lot of reason's to hit a woman" not that you actually should. I agree on the knife reason, though. I'd rather deal with some uproar, than get stabbed or my neck sliced, like that april fools prank guy,
/r/MensRights03/04/13 06:36 AM
5

Another woman mad that guys make up 90% of core gamer's, the exact audience these get together target. I know, some girl will say "girls make up 47% of all gamers" without taking into consideration that guys don't consider Farmville and the Sims anywhere close to a "core" game. These companies do promotions that target their audience, and women do not play those games. Not to say there are no women core gamers. There are some, but most that show up at conventions or such are there to dress up. I…
/r/MensRights03/04/13 06:18 AM
5

I think it is cowardly to hit anyone who does not come at you with violence first. Walking away is the brave move. But if they come at you with violence, be they man or woman, it the becomes about protecting yourself, and that is never cowardly. If she is an annoying nag, leave her and find someone better. Then feel sorry for whatever unlucky sob is her next victim.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 05:28 AM
5

I actually saw a girl here in the states react poorly to a british friend advances. He told her he thought she was a really fit bird. Her response was something along the lines of "What, do you think I have chicken legs, or something", rofl.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 05:21 AM
2

I am going to go with the others who say don't get married. All it is, is a contract anyways. It doesn't prove love, or sustain it. That you are uncomfortable enough to mention her mentioning a prenup, you should be equally uncomfortable about the contract of marriage. They really are no different. Society just looks at them differently. Marriage, imo, is just feeding female vanity by getting everyone to stand up and turn to look at them. Put the money on a down payment for a home instead, or to…
/r/MensRights03/04/13 05:16 AM
2

More of a libertarian myself, which seems to nicely ride the line between the conservative and liberals. To the right fiscally, to the left socially... depends on which side is limiting my liberties, and they both do, differently.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 05:00 AM
3

Come up with studies that do better than "many women say" and I will listen. I am not pro circumcision, but you are using such blatantly anti-circumcision material as if it is scientific. It is not. At all. Again, 80% of US men are circumcised. If we were doing all the damage you guys say, women in the US wouldn't be quiet about it, and would not have a circumcision preference. You did read the title of thread, right? It is akin to being against abortion, and using a christian right website as y…
/r/MensRights03/04/13 01:05 AM
1

The 1st half just seems like more mumbo jumbo. I think you guys are giving the vagina way too much credit. It is unlikely the vagina gives a damn whether it is cut or not and could even tell. Ribbed for her pleasure seems to do just as well in places where circumcision is not common. The penis head on a circumcised guy would have a more pronounced ridge than that on an uncircumcised guy due to the scarring. But, at least you didn't jump off the 'girls don't like friction" cliff. 90% of the place…
/r/MensRights03/04/13 12:04 AM
1

It is funny, I was in mock murder, burglary, etc mock trial all throughout Jr high and High school. Not once (this was late 80's early 90's) was the accused a girl. Not once. "and show the victim that the process can work, Martin said" looks like guilt is a foregone conclusion. At least they are being realistic, lol.
/r/MensRights02/04/13 09:46 PM
1

Yep, took the knife in throat post for me to go from watcher, to poster. Sorry, but nothing I have said is in any way trolling. If you can't counter, maybe try a different tact than whining about trolls. That is what the feminists are best at, no? It seems to me, you are more concerned with silencing any alternative opinion (even in this case, where I am simply pointing out a logical fallacy you made) to further support your point of view. Not very smart to try and silence the majority of cut me…
/r/MensRights02/04/13 09:32 PM
1

I am really not trying to pick a circumcised v uncircumcised fight, but just logically I have a problem with the "women prefer uncircumcised men because there is less friction" part. Sex is all about friction. You want it to be moist/lubricated friction, for sure... but 'ribbed for her pleasure" and all the exotic dildo's seem to be a counter. I think what is most important is how well you wiggle it, and any difference between cut or uncut is mental more than everything else.
/r/MensRights02/04/13 08:38 PM
2

It is all just visual. IMO, it comes down to it is 'different' than her norm, so off putting. When I was in europe, the fact that I was cut caused double takes to girls I was with. So if she has been with 10 cut guys and 2 uncut, she just isn't as used to uncut, and thus might have a hangup about it. I promise, though, from all the talks I have had with women about it, they really don't care as long as you wiggle it right.
/r/MensRights02/04/13 08:16 PM
1

Well, she sounds like a hack to me... a loss of sensitivity (foreskin) kinda means it will take longer. Most women I have known really don't care, either way. I am cut, but if I have a son, don't plan to. However, in sub saharan africa, I might reconsider. Shrug.
/r/MensRights02/04/13 08:05 PM
6

That she contributed greatly to science doesn't necessarily mean that she cherished those accomplishments more than being a mother. You know, she was up in years, it is well within the realm of possibility she had input on what she felt were her greatest accomplishments. When I am 80+, I sure hope life was more fulfilling than my day job.
/r/MensRights02/04/13 07:56 PM
1

Well, I think that will be changing... with the GGTOW movement getting new converts everyday, you see a ton of articles about depressed, childless 35 yo women with no prospects, and not much complaining from the single men. Shrug.
/r/MensRights02/04/13 07:06 PM
3

Plumbing line made me have to clean my screen
/r/MensRights02/04/13 06:10 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter