TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ZeeMastermind Archive

View 1 posts and 18 comments by ZeeMastermind on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Source? You've got good points, but unless you provide evidence for any of your claims and rebuttals discussion is pointless.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/15 11:01 PM
1

Well, I think the largest issue is the glass ceiling. I believe that nowadays, it's rare for an employer to consciously discriminate against women (There is still unconscious bias, make no mistake, and there are always cases where people such as TRPers with unflattering views of a woman's capability to do a "man's" job are in a supervising position). Your data on the closing wage gap within professions shows that women doing the same work get paid the same amount. So, the question becomes why ar…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/15 09:10 PM
1

Actually, that figure may be a bit old. In 2010, it was 77 cents. Study - page 13, second column, 3rd bullet point It was 81 cents in 2011. Wiki Study - says the figure right in the introduction. In 2012, it was .77 again. Source - page 13, bottom of 3rd column In 2013, it was .78 Source - page 15, first column, second bullet point. The 2014 report likely won't be released until the taxes are in (I'm assuming that's where the US census gets its data from). The data is sound, it's not like anyone…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/15 03:53 PM
1

The 25-40% wage gap (And I have never seen a 40% wage gap shown in recent time) vs the 5-10% wage gap are both true depending on which variables you constrain for. The 25-40% wage gap shows it for all full time across the board, whereas the 5-10% controls for each field. The 5-10% statistic shows that once hired, the discrimination is smaller. The 25-40% wage gap, when examined with this, shows that women are not in as many high-paying professions. Think of it as how the median and mean can tell…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/15 08:44 PM
1

Okay. http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/five-myths-about-the-gender-pay-gap/2014/07/25/9e5cff34-fcd5-11e3-8176-f2c941cf35f1_story.html
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/15 07:16 PM
1

My English teacher was single when she adopted her daughter. Most states allow unmarried people to adopt. It is considerably harder for a single person to adopt, and there is discrimination against it, but it is not illegal and people have done it.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/15 05:41 PM
0

Why does it have to be in extremes? Why not have people all along the scale, because people in the real world dress all along the scale? The main problem is unrealistic standards.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/15 08:53 PM
1

Yeah, the intro was talking about how the red pill has almost 100 subscribers now.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/15 06:13 PM
1

I was being honest, it's a long reading (It took long to write, too) and a TL;DR is standard on Reddit, especially since I didn't give it a proper introduction or conclusion. I was demonstrating basic set theory. If it is given 'If A, then B' we cannot say 'If B, then A.' We would have to prove that "A if and only if B" first. Umbrellas and raining can be simpler for some people. I'm not going to retype everything. If you want to, you can read the first paragraph and respond to that. I simply an…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/15 06:11 PM
2

First off, feminism isn't the dictionary definition. If it was, most people would like it, as it stands, more people dislike feminism than like it. The dictionary definition is the only one encompassing all the feminist organizations. The wage gap myth is that men make 77 cents on the mans dollar for the same job. Full time in the same field =/= same hours in the same exact job. Feminists like to lie about this to help push their goals even though it's not true and the difference is subtle enoug…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/15 06:03 PM
2

I'm not sure where the evidence in your passage is, so I'll try to respond as thoroughly as possible. Replies will be here longer than mine, and will probably explain with great clarity and depth ideas which you admit you missed the meaning of like "feminine imperative" or "sexual strategy" or others, in an attempt to CYV. However, I feel that there is no point. It is futile. These terms are not seen outside of the Red Pill community, and if they are not defined in the introduction, I will take …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/15 06:00 PM
1

As a man, I am biologically unable to go out, get myself pregnant and be provided for by the state, which any woman with a working womb can. That is an opportunity I, and all men, simply do not have. Feminism has never sought to remove the welfare state to give women the equal opportunity to pay for their own kids. You can adopt. Additionally, there is some research out there for male pregnancy. And feminism has always worked to get women into careers, and with better wages. I don't know what yo…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/15 05:34 PM
2

Do you want me to put in a TL;DR for you?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/15 05:23 PM
0

Over-sexualization has been has been growing over the past few decades. Yes, it is what sells products. Companies wouldn't do that if it didn't sell. It would be ridiculous to argue that, it would be like saying cars aren't convenient. Anyone can acknowledge the effect of a car on the atmosphere Over-sexualization of women does have consequences for girls and women that can also harm men, according to the website.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/15 05:22 PM
0

Why do I always see the same defense about feminism: Look at the dictionary. Last time I checked no one uses the same defense for "Democratic People's Republic of Korea". So everything you said about and based on that definition of feminism is moot. The difference is that there is only one DPRK, but there are many different feminist organizations with different goals and motivations. The definition is the only one that represents all of them. Why does affirmative action helps minorities. I'm a m…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/15 05:15 PM
0

Because the US justice system is messed up. There are cases where the innocent are found guilty in many crimes. This isn't unique to rape, or to men. However, just looking at rape, you can see that depending on the report, sample size, and year, studies find that between 1.5% and 90% of rape cases are falsely reported. The 90% estimate took a sample size of 18, and the 1.5% estimate took a sample size of 56. I don't think either of those are high enough to be statistically significant. The media…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/15 04:34 PM
3

Eh, Merriam-Webster defines misogyny as a 'hatred of women' and Oxford Dictionaries goes to say 'Dislike of, contempt for, or ingrained prejudice against women.' Using 'misogynistic' to describe an act seems alright. Although Oxford does say 'or ingrained prejudice,' the key word is 'or.' The word 'misogynistic' could be used to describe an action as exemplifying a 'hatred,' 'dislike,' or 'contempt' of women, even if it does not exemplify 'ingrained prejudice.' Sexism may be more precise than mi…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/15 02:42 PM
3

I wasn't aware institutionalized and systematic prejudice and discrimination could be quantified. I was under the impression that different groups faced different types of oppression and prejudice in their daily lives, depending on factors like where they live, among other things. I'm not even sure your sample metric has any basis. It shows scientists as having lower privilege, but isn't higher education something harder to get into for the underprivileged? It's also a little silly how you think…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/15 02:29 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter