TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ZenPyx Archive

View 1 posts and 152 comments by ZenPyx on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
13

Anti-MRMZenPyx/r/MensRights29/04/17 07:19 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Oh, I see. I got more of a message that if a man accidentally brushes into a woman, the woman doesn't need to create a scene about it because it was an accident
/r/MensRights30/10/17 07:24 AM
10

Yeah, I think the article is talking about accidental stuff not actual sexual assault
/r/MensRights29/10/17 08:25 PM
3

Wait, so you'd be charging the battery with your phone?
/r/MensRights07/09/17 08:45 PM
3

Cheese is one syllable, on-ion is 2
/r/MensRights27/08/17 07:27 PM
6

Yeah, almost any list of words will be done in shortest to longest order for that reason. Even flavours of stuff, like cheese and onion, or salt and vinegar
/r/MensRights27/08/17 09:28 AM
1

So when some fat fuck gets into the forces with 4 pushups and then can't even carry a rifle, the burden is just going to be placed on the other women in the squad. So they are actually punishing other women?
/r/MensRights11/08/17 02:53 PM
1

Tbh half of the banter on the internet is getting called all of this stuff. Since everything is so anonymous, and no-one knows any insults that might work, they just go for the most general stuff. It's almost a symbol of respect to be called a fag on the internet.
/r/MensRights11/08/17 08:44 AM
6

Imo, any business should be allowed to disallow customers entry for any reason. Sure, it might not seem nice for a person to be denied entry for a trivial reason, but it's the business's choice and they will be the ones who suffer from reduced sales.
/r/MensRights07/08/17 03:56 PM
4

I've run into a few myself. They tend to gravitate towards schools and universities, and I've seen quite a few teachers who are a bit crazy on the whole feminism
/r/MensRights04/08/17 01:34 PM
3

Dude. Fucking relax. You don't have to take the statement so literally. How would you even conduct such a study? He's given sufficient evidence in my books.
/r/MensRights04/07/17 05:45 PM
3

You say that, but once again, it simply isn't true. Maybe reread it a second time.
/r/MensRights04/07/17 05:22 PM
13

You can say that, but it doesn't mean it is correct
/r/MensRights04/07/17 03:18 PM
16

Spezina Williams?
/r/PussyPass30/06/17 06:36 PM
7

She just casually fires off a shot while wrestling with him for the gun... that could have ricocheted and hit an innocent person. Good job she had that guy to actually aim for her
/r/PussyPass22/06/17 05:33 PM
2

Notice how they tell men they can be sexually assaulted, but they don't tell women they can sexually assault. Even when they try to be progressive, they still blame men.
/r/MensRights22/06/17 04:02 PM
3

Wait if you rape someone but you are forced to, who is to blame?
/r/MensRights19/06/17 05:42 PM
1

That's the sun though, right? I don't think they are the type to call masculinity toxic in the first place
/r/MensRights15/06/17 08:45 PM
84

That's the issue, it's a case study that will let this shot happen again and again until we have segregated movies like in the 60's
/r/MensRights13/06/17 04:51 PM
1

Yeah. People talk about how great Trudeau is, but that is only because he appeals to sjws with stupid policies.
/r/MensRights11/06/17 02:23 PM
3

Are you fucking kidding me? Is this actually real anymore? Do Canada not even see the stupidity in this and c16?
/r/MensRights11/06/17 10:51 AM
5

I think this actually brings a real light to the social justice movement. Boys aren't even allowed to be themselves without being called a rapist, they have to conform to whatever these things want of them to just be labeled a "normal" person.
/r/MensRights26/05/17 05:49 AM
5

I guess she is saying women are superior? I'm not really sure, it does really sound like she is asking for equality with a bit of cheeky banter mixed in there
/r/MensRights25/05/17 03:47 PM
1

Look to practical evidence though. Christians currently don't have many Christian countries where rape is encouraged. Saudi Arabia exists... Well, the scripture did change, ever heard of the new testament? It's not the religion I have a problem with necessarily, it's that a lot of people are potentially misinterpreting it to mean "do a fuckin jihad, guys". It is the primary motivation for a lot of these people. And I still don't get where you are going with that acronym rubbish. "United" isn't a…
/r/PussyPass24/05/17 08:19 PM
2

People are mad at Islam not because of those who follow it, but because it encourages countries to stone gay people, kill women who don't cover themselves up, legalise rape, and encourages jihads. It's not because of the religion itself per say, it's because people have interpreted it to mean these things, such as "strike at the necks of those who oppose Allah"(translation, of course) which of course most people would interpret to be old mumbojumbo, but some people take it as law and kill people…
/r/PussyPass24/05/17 07:28 PM
3

Good. I hope those morons ban everybody on reddit. I'd love to see that sub crash and burn.
/r/PussyPass21/05/17 07:18 AM
4

OK, before antifa went completely mental
/r/MensRights18/05/17 03:32 PM
6

Fucks sake, I've been using that word. Back in my day, we just called them Feminazis, before antifa came along
/r/MensRights18/05/17 01:24 PM
11

No? I thought that was a word used to disassociate "actual" feminists from the nutcases
/r/MensRights18/05/17 01:01 PM
18

Yeah I don't think it's real, they've tagged themselves as "#rad fem" which I think is an antisjw word Edit: Apparently it isn't an antisjw word. Don't kill the speculation guys
/r/MensRights18/05/17 11:04 AM
1

Yeah, I do agree, but I think in facebooks case, with groups supporting male rights being shut down for no reason, perhaps also shutting down male hate groups will at least come off as fair to their users
/r/MensRights17/05/17 08:49 PM
1

How did I derail discussion? I simply provided an idea as to why facebook can get away with censorship of any kind, it has nothing to do with men's rights
/r/MensRights17/05/17 01:58 PM
0

When did the death penalty come into this? I don't think shutting down a scummy facebook group is exactly akin to murdering someone in cold blood
/r/MensRights17/05/17 05:55 AM
0

Except sexual violence isn't the same as sexual assault, right? Does it not also include domestic abuse? I'd like to see a source too though
/r/MensRights17/05/17 05:13 AM
0

Wait, so you mean to say, more or less, is if a woman committed a crime against you, you would drop all charges?
/r/MensRights17/05/17 05:02 AM
19

They can censor what they like, it is their website. It is better that they stick to their own rules and remove all hate speech than have any double standards
/r/MensRights16/05/17 09:58 PM
4

Yeah, it's pretty odd that there would be so many capable men in such stereotypically female positions. I guess it is more of the domestic/professional side of it that is different?
/r/MensRights29/04/17 10:13 PM
22

Exactly. It would be like forcing more boys into doing something dominated by females, like the beauty industry, even if they didn't enjoy it, and even if there would be hundreds of people who would love to do it but are straight up denied because of their gender.
/r/MensRights29/04/17 09:55 PM
10

Well, of course, if one partner was withholding assets then that would bring new evidence to the table and nullify the divorce until a new solution could be made
/r/MensRights05/04/17 05:11 PM
23

I think once a divorce is done, that should be it. No more relating the two people together at all, they had that time during the divorce settlements. As far as the legal system is concerned, they are just 2 random strangers, not "ex wife of a millionaire"
/r/MensRights05/04/17 04:04 PM
3

If some person comes at me with a knife, I don't give a fuck if they have a dick or not...
/r/MensRights04/04/17 04:33 PM
19

What's wrong with violence against women? I don't see a difference between a woman beating up a man threatening her and a man doing the same to a woman.... also half of these don't warrant a segregated class, when they could instead include the few men who want to do it anyway. And I should hope they don't actually try to simulate rapes for the sake of learning...
/r/MensRights04/04/17 02:24 PM
67

I want to see their reply now.... I wonder how they justify it
/r/MensRights04/04/17 05:14 AM
16

Exactly. Or just threaten to sue if they don't offer the lower rates. This kind of stuff is indeed illegal in the UK
/r/MensRights30/03/17 05:31 PM
1

Wait, hold on a second, is her name analey?
/r/MensRights25/03/17 12:31 PM
1

Exactly. The company literally has nothing to do with it
/r/MensRights18/03/17 05:21 PM
29

Why is it the militaries job to stop nudes being leaked? If you don't want your nudes leaked, just don't take any.
/r/MensRights18/03/17 12:25 PM
6

But the men have to pay for this privilege I assume?
/r/MensRights17/03/17 04:45 PM
2

Can't be saved by a whiteknight if you are both falling off of a building
/r/MensRights11/03/17 10:29 PM
-3

I've not had kids personally, but from what I've heard, some ridiculously high percentage of Americans are circumcised (something like 98% I believe), so it's probably considered a bit unusual.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 08:19 PM
30

Injury is impossible for female feminist villains as any attempt to do so will result in 500 whiteknights jumping in the way. Or, at least it seems that way nowadays.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 05:52 PM
466

I think the last slide is a bit untrue. In the US, it's more like "you are circumcising, right? Because it would be weird if you didn't". Goddam hypocrites
/r/MensRights11/03/17 05:44 PM
10

I think he thought it would be on the regular YouTube, not the payperview side
/r/MensRights06/03/17 08:47 PM
56

Yeah I totally agree. I don't want to pay reparations for something someone did 200 years ago, and I certainly can't see how it promotes equality
/r/MensRights05/03/17 09:57 PM
1

I think we should add some other symbols in there for alienkin as well, the earthcentric language you are using is triggering me in 7 dimensions as once
/r/MensRights05/03/17 09:53 PM
2

Yeah that makes sense
/r/MensRights05/03/17 04:06 PM
2

So you are saying that much like how dice should be banned because gambling is bad, mankind should be banned because it relates to men, who are bad?
/r/MensRights05/03/17 03:52 PM
1

This subreddit?
/r/MensRights05/03/17 03:50 PM
1

But child has "hi" in it, which looks like "his" or "he". Greetings, fellow hupertheir
/r/MensRights05/03/17 03:49 PM
3

Yes. And I believe man has gender neutral origins in german, whereas human has origins in Latin I believe.
/r/MensRights05/03/17 03:48 PM
3

Homosexual is banned? What the actual fuck? What if a "same sex" man calls himself homosexual? These people bring disrespect to the marvellous language that is English.
/r/MensRights05/03/17 03:46 PM
8

Tbh I can't see anything in the future but hostile takeover of these government offices filled with feminists sharing a collective brain cell, who've been hired to fill ridiculous quotas. These homeless men will see everyone else getting help, and begin to harbour resentment, and from resentment rises violence
/r/MensRights05/03/17 03:44 PM
5

It's not healthier unless you live in a fucking swamp with no running water... and the foreskin contains something like 1000 nerve endings, and plays a huge role in lubrication and maintaining sensitivity. I'm pretty sure the foreskin is reformed from remnants of the clit in the womb... "It's not a biological thing, it's a domination thing"- so cutting the end off of some babies penis is a biological thing to do? And you cannot just say it is only men who perform female circumcision, that is a h…
/r/MensRights05/03/17 03:38 PM
15

Of course, this raises the issue of 'what if the man runs away and can't be found before the birth'
/r/MensRights05/03/17 03:25 PM
2

What has the world come to...
/r/MensRights05/03/17 11:41 AM
5

Does this work for female students too? I guess not, but legally speaking, it must do, right?
/r/MensRights05/03/17 10:09 AM
35

He's literally strapped down... I'm glad I don't live in freedomland, this looks like torture. Of babies.
/r/MensRights05/03/17 10:08 AM
1

Yeah, I can't actually zoom in on this picture, so thanks anyway :)
/r/MensRights27/02/17 05:38 PM
5

I think he wants the two bits of blurry grey text at the bottom, but if this is what he wanted, thanks :)
/r/MensRights27/02/17 04:12 PM
2

Ik. It feels like any interaction I have with anyone will have to start with "do you want to do this? Sign here. This? Sign again in that box"
/r/MensRights24/02/17 06:13 AM
1

Not if they are uncomfortable after it happened...
/r/MensRights24/02/17 06:11 AM
2

I mean... so many questions. Why was an individual who identified as female at a male only club? Why is he being charged with sexual assault... and why does the accusers comfortableness determine how guilty the accused is
/r/MensRights23/02/17 07:22 PM
10

It probably is tbh. Many famous feminists have gone on record saying they want a male population of 20%-10%
/r/MensRights18/02/17 11:42 PM
12

We have to at least hope
/r/MensRights18/02/17 11:01 PM
130

They do realise that male suicide rates will go up 10 fold if men don't have a place to talk with other men, right?
/r/MensRights18/02/17 08:49 PM
12

Well, that's good news. Shame it might not be properly applied in courts by biased judges
/r/MensRights18/02/17 04:34 PM
–

I think we have unfortunately picked up a small quantity of 1488's
/r/MensRights18/02/17 04:31 PM
1

Does that mean black women are going through slavery2 or 2*slavery? And does the fact that they are men cancel out the slavery that black men experienced in the 1800s? Does this person have any grasp on reality?
/r/MensRights17/02/17 01:37 PM
1

Simple solution. Anyone who makes a false accusation should get the amount of time in prison that the accused would have gotten if the accusation wasn't proved false
/r/MensRights17/02/17 08:46 AM
16

Uhhh because obviously, women can't be racist, the only people who can be racist are cis white straight men and Adelle for not giving up that award
/r/MensRights17/02/17 08:18 AM
2

Sacist or rexist?
/r/MensRights16/02/17 09:06 AM
13

A swell chap.
/r/MensRights15/02/17 01:06 PM
8

It's actually fucking stupid... I would feel terrible of I were struggling with a drug addiction now
/r/MensRights15/02/17 11:40 AM
8

Reminds me of that scene in independence day where will smith opens up the alien craft '"Welcome to Earth" stomps head in'
/r/MensRights14/02/17 09:02 PM
8

Just avoid them in general. As we all know, a man can't be raped.
/r/MensRights13/02/17 09:43 PM
13

It would be fucking purge night every night... and reddit arguments would turn serious really fast with doxxing
/r/MensRights13/02/17 08:59 AM
2

as long as it fills up their diversity, they don't care
/r/MensRights12/02/17 09:24 AM
2

It's OK, we all have moments like that
/r/MensRights11/02/17 11:16 PM
3

It's a drop down box with various ethnicitites I think
/r/MensRights11/02/17 10:35 PM
11

They can't tell you that you aren't a woman, or else they are being transphobic
/r/MensRights11/02/17 10:35 PM
9

These two cunts need to have some retribution for their actions. You could probably charge em both with assault and slander or inciting violence, but play it safe for a few days before you do anything. Back up the tapes, find out who these people are, lawyer up, etc. Provided the CCTV footage is good, you could probably sue for quite a bit, and you could certainly stop any accusations coming your way. Inform your relatives and people you are close to what really happened in case this gets all ov…
/r/MensRights11/02/17 03:39 PM
16

Yeah. It's a self perpetuating cycle. Older people talk about how women are oppressed, younger women think they are still oppressed, try to fight the oppression that no longer exists, repeat.
/r/MensRights11/02/17 08:10 AM
10

Like zombies?
/r/MensRights11/02/17 08:09 AM
5

The fuck?
/r/MensRights11/02/17 08:08 AM
117

It's like Kim jong un. They have immense power, but are just so self unaware and stupid that they have no idea what to do with it.
/r/MensRights10/02/17 10:43 PM
9

Genius
/r/MensRights10/02/17 04:20 PM
2

The issue is not the people who want rights for women. The issue is the increasing proportion of people who don't want rights for men within the feminist movement, and those who act like it is still the 1920s. Thanks for sharing your view, I'm glad you haven't been sucked into all of this.
/r/MensRights10/02/17 04:12 PM
3

It quite literally says "(parody) obvious sarcasm" in the bio... the fuck is this?
/r/MensRights09/02/17 06:56 AM
6

Might want to chuck in a "most" somewhere there before you take that opinion off of mensrights
/r/MensRights07/02/17 06:17 PM
10

People actually support this.... While not working
/r/MensRights07/02/17 06:00 PM
1

Yeah, it's just a pointless addition that doesn't add to the definition in any way. Especially considering "sexism" cannot realistically be quantified.
/r/MensRights05/02/17 06:11 PM
11

No. Social media should still be impartial. It is literally the definition of censorship
/r/MensRights05/02/17 12:03 PM
2

Even so...
/r/MensRights05/02/17 12:10 AM
1

Yeah
/r/MensRights04/02/17 10:42 PM
1

They also commit more crimes than pretty much any other demographic
/r/MensRights04/02/17 08:54 PM
1

Jesus Christ dude, that's dark
/r/MensRights04/02/17 06:22 PM
27

I was alright with it until I saw synonyms... apparently chauvinism is exactly the same as sexism... I'm fucking done
/r/MensRights04/02/17 06:12 PM
10

Well, at least they understood the feminist mindset. Equal pay isn't enough if you just keep pretending you aren't getting equal pay
/r/MensRights02/02/17 06:08 PM
156

No, but he should receive a large amount of monetary compensation from her. No jail.
/r/MensRights01/02/17 05:45 PM
1

It's not like they actually did anything wrong, they just reposted a photo with a relatively tame caption.... if she can't deal with the comments, don't go on the internet claiming to support an unpopular cause
/r/MensRights29/01/17 11:27 AM
1

Isn't everyone involved in the outdoor industry apart from basement dwellers? I've been outside at least once today, and I saw at least one trigender transracial...
/r/MensRights29/01/17 11:17 AM
21

Ahh. Except you forget that men are subject to many of these trials as well. A man gets no say in his own children's birth or lack thereof. Frankly, Hillary has said some disturbing stuff, especially about homosexuals, in the recent past, whereas Trump seems to be acting in a decent manner and wants equality for all. Men's rights is not anti woman. It is against the idea that women should be the only ones making societal progress, and frankly men are being left far behind in that regard. In term…
/r/MensRights26/01/17 10:08 PM
1

Well, I don't trust you because muh feminism, fucking cis white straight male
/r/MensRights24/01/17 09:49 PM
2

This is why we should have the death penalty. She showed no remorse. She does not deserve to waste our food, breathe our oxygen, or see the wonders of this world, let alone speak of her mild punishment as if it is everyone else's fault. This scum should be dead, and not being backed up by a movement like this.
/r/MensRights24/01/17 06:37 PM
2

Only non human characters and people with 6 genders or more
/r/MensRights21/01/17 12:53 PM
1

IDK, are you a misogynist?
/r/MensRights21/01/17 09:00 AM
11

Well, not for long, before they ban women from video games because they are too objectified and ban men because you can't have a male protagonist
/r/MensRights20/01/17 07:29 PM
10

An expert opinion? The reason why our societies have such standards and the societies we have have gone to the moon and lived for thousands of years? Because these standards have ultimately helped us. You don't need an article for that.
/r/MensRights20/01/17 07:23 PM
24

So they are literally encouraging male genital mutilation? I'm going to make a film called "Bad dads", and talk about how great mutilated vaginas are. Why is this more acceptable?
/r/MensRights20/01/17 06:43 PM
2

I don't understand the whole "drunk" thing. If both parties are wasted or one is a bit tipsy, it shouldn't be rape. Sure, if one is absolutely trollied and the other is completely sober, perhaps, but I can seldom see that happening.
/r/MensRights18/01/17 05:24 PM
1

Not illegal as long as you only film in public places. IDK about court, the media are sometimes allowed in
/r/MensRights17/01/17 07:41 PM
2

The seats give a huge safety disadvantage to men
/r/MensRights17/01/17 06:14 AM
1

It's a joke about men...
/r/MensRights11/01/17 10:08 PM
1

It's not a joke about beards....
/r/MensRights11/01/17 05:26 PM
1

You are a joke. See that. It isn't funny. Especially when it's about an entire gender.
/r/MensRights11/01/17 03:56 PM
1

Which she will. Most definitely.
/r/MensRights11/01/17 03:55 PM
1

Yeah. But blaming men for people being assholes isn't fair either
/r/MensRights10/01/17 09:24 PM
1

Except it is socially unacceptable to pressure a woman into not wearing makeup, but it isn't socially unacceptable to force a man to shave.
/r/MensRights10/01/17 08:29 PM
1

Oh wow
/r/MensRights10/01/17 08:28 PM
1

Yeah.
/r/MensRights10/01/17 08:28 PM
2

So is the reply. Doesn't mean it isn't highlighting a double standard
/r/MensRights10/01/17 08:28 PM
42

I half expected a sub talking about people trespassing on their front gardens for a second
/r/MensRights10/01/17 07:21 PM
-1

Not any joke. Just generalisations calling all lumbersexuals ugly.
/r/MensRights10/01/17 07:20 PM
–

What did I say that was hypocritical?
/r/MensRights10/01/17 07:15 PM
1

What did I say that was hypocritical?
/r/MensRights10/01/17 07:15 PM
1107

It's a double standard. This subreddit digs that stuff, even if it isn't specifically men's rights.
/r/MensRights10/01/17 01:44 PM
1

why should a man who hasn't had any children have to subsidize for a woman who has chosen to have children?
/r/MensRights09/01/17 06:22 PM
1

There was a law passed a while ago that forced medical insurance companies to offer equal rates to men and women, and guess what? Women forced men's rates up.
/r/MensRights09/01/17 03:02 PM
7

I hope that smug face in her mugshot will work against her too.
/r/MensRights07/01/17 08:53 AM
1

ahhhh, I didn't see the time it took place in, thought there should have been dna evidence but I can see this happening in the 90's. Shame for her then I guess. OP should really fix his post
/r/MensRights05/01/17 06:01 PM
2

The case should never have succeeded with a testimony alone anyway.
/r/MensRights05/01/17 06:23 AM
–

I know, right. It wouldn't be so bad if she admitted it before she was legally an adult (IE 17) so that she would get a shorter up punishment (as if she will ever be punished). But no, just fuck with his life, because you hold all of the power. I hope she pays a lot of money.
/r/MensRights05/01/17 06:22 AM
3

I bet he was asking for it too. I bet she just did it in self defence /s
/r/MensRights04/01/17 11:18 AM
-2

I thinking might be an acronym for gender studies
/r/MensRights01/01/17 12:02 AM
4

But she is only racist because of the patriarchy.
/r/MensRights31/12/16 10:50 PM
1

Potentially. Although you could argue the same about government pushes to put women in it
/r/MensRights31/12/16 10:29 PM
21

But people who aren't white can't be sexist. It's only white straight males who can discriminate and put people into groups based on characteristics outside of their control /s
/r/MensRights31/12/16 08:05 PM
1

Yeah, I amended my original comment. The study factored in demographics. So a higher percentage of female applicants get accepted, not a higher number
/r/MensRights31/12/16 01:17 PM
3

there is a huge difference between hiring and currently hired. Positive discrimination and all that.
/r/MensRights30/12/16 11:35 AM
-2

a lot of people think they can though, and force these "30% of the workforce must be 'xyz'"
/r/MensRights29/12/16 10:37 PM
15

I can't find that article, but I can find this https://www.google.co.uk/amp/www.gadgette.com/2015/10/30/tech-companies-are-hiring-women-238-faster-than-men/amp/?client=ms-android-htc
/r/MensRights29/12/16 07:53 PM
3

Meh. Wasn't really a mad Max movie, it was kind of a "let's watch furiosa and her blank slate of a white knight". Smexy visuals though
/r/MensRights29/12/16 07:27 PM
26

Except they are also hiring twice as many women as men. So it kinda is a rights issue. Sneaky edit: I think the study this was based on factored in demographics. So since a lot fewer women go into tech than men, they are being hired in lower numbers, but greater percentages
/r/MensRights29/12/16 07:23 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter